Patterns of recurrence in patients with melanoma and histologically negative but RT-PCR-positive sentinel lymph nodes

Molecular Staging of Sentinel Lymph Nodes Identifies Melanoma Patients at Increased Risk of Nodal Recurrence

BACKGROUND

Molecular staging of sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) may identify patients who are node-negative by standard microscopic staging but are at increased risk for regional nodal recurrence; such patients may benefit from completion lymph node dissection (CLND).

STUDY DESIGN

In a multicenter, randomized clinical trial, patients with tumor-negative SLNs by standard pathology (hematoxylin and eosin [H and E] serial sections and immunohistochemistry [IHC]) underwent reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis of SLNs for melanoma-specific mRNA. Microscopically negative/PCR+ patients were randomized to observation, CLND, or CLND with high-dose interferon (HDI). For this post-hoc analysis, clinicopathologic features and survival outcomes, including overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS), were compared between PCR+ patients who underwent CLND vs observation. Microscopic and molecular node-negative (PCR-) patients were included for comparison.

RESULTS

A total of 556 patients were PCR+: 180 underwent observation, and 376 underwent CLND. An additional 908 PCR- patients were observed. Median follow-up was 72 months. Disease-free survival (DFS) was significantly better for PCR+ patients who underwent CLND compared with observation (p = 0.0218). No statistically significant differences in OS or distant disease-free survival (DDFS) were seen. Regional lymph node recurrence-free survival (LNRFS) was improved in PCR+ patients with CLND compared to observation (p = 0.0065). The PCR+ patients in the observation group had the worst DFS; those with CLND had similar DFS to that in the PCR- group (p = 0.9044).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with microscopically negative/PCR+ SLN have an increased risk of nodal recurrence that was mitigated by CLND. Although CLND did not affect OS, these data suggest that molecular detection of melanoma-specific mRNA in the SLN predicts a greater risk of nodal recurrence and deserves further study.

When will selective lymphadenectomy become standard of care in melanoma?

In 2006 Meiron Thomas, writing in the British Journal of Surgery, made the following statement about the value of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) as a staging procedure in cutaneous malignant melanoma (1): "Perhaps a more important concern for those hoping to gain reassurance from accurate nodal staging relates to positive SN(S) that are prognostically inaccurate, information that can be devastating for the patient, leading to unnecessary lymphadenectomy and possibly unnecessary adjuvant therapy". In September 2011 Meyrick Ross and Gershenwald, writing in the Journal of Surgical Oncology, made the following statement about the management of patients with cutaneous malignant melanoma (2): "Sentinel node biopsy has become an important component of the initial management of many of these patients for accurate staging of regional lymph nodes, as well as enhanced regional disease control and improved survival in the patients with microscopically involved nodes." These two extremes have polarized the debate about the proper management of patients with malignant melanoma and have lead to widespread confusion and dismay amongst practicing clinicians, GP's and patient groups. In fact both statements are inaccurate, misleading and result from a false reading of the literature and in the case of Ross and Gershenwald a false interpretation of their own data (3). The following article explains why.

"Stealth" melanoma cells in histology-negative sentinel lymph nodes

A proportion of patients who develop regional and distant recurrences of melanoma after a pathologically negative sentinel lymph node (SN) biopsy are reported to have enhanced signals for melanoma-associated messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) when sensitive molecular approaches such as reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) are used to evaluate their SN tissue. The significance of these findings remains controversial, because the cellular source of the augmented signals cannot be known as the nodal tissue is destroyed during preparation for RT-PCR. Nevertheless, it is claimed that the source of the augmented signal is covert metastatic melanoma cells. To determine whether there are histologically occult metastases in SN and whether there are sources of augmentable melanoma-associated mRNA other than melanoma cells, we applied reverse transcriptase in situ polymerase chain reaction (RT in situ PCR) to formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded nodal tissue. This approach amplifies small amounts of melanoma-associated mRNA and permits identification of cells that express that mRNA. Cells containing MART-1 mRNA were detected in 6 of 21 SNs (29%) and 2 of 16 nonsentinel lymph node (NSNs) (13%) that were tumor negative on hematoxylin and eosin and on immunohistochemical assessment for S-100, MART-1, and HMB-45. In patients with microscopic evidence of melanoma in their SN, MART-1 mRNA-positive cells were identified in 2 of 7 NSNs (29%) that were histologically tumor free. MART-1 mRNA-positive cells were also detected in tumor-negative SN sections from 6 of 7 (86%) nodes that had tumor present in areas of the node not represented in the studied sections. Some cells that expressed MART-1 mRNA that was diffusely distributed in the cytoplasm appeared to be melanoma cells, whereas others resembled macrophages. The latter cells expressed augmented mRNA on granules that were intermixed with melanin granules. In other cases, MART-1 mRNA-positive macrophage-like cells contained nuclei and nucleoli more typical of melanoma cells and may represent the macrophage-melanoma hybrids that have been previously reported. Combination of RT in situ PCR for MART-1 mRNA and immunohistochemistry for CD68 revealed that CD68 was colocalized in some cells that expressed MART-1 mRNA. Some lymph nodes that are tumor negative by histology and immunohistochemistry contain cells that express mRNA for MART-1. Some of these cells may be interpreted as "stealth" melanoma cells in which, despite the presence of MART-1 mRNA, there is an absence of immunohistochemically detectable MART-1 protein. Other cells that contain MART-1 mRNA are clearly not melanoma cells or may represent melanoma hybrids. These findings should be taken into account when interpreting and applying the results of RT-PCR analysis of nodal (and other) tissues.

Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with melanoma: a meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To perform a meta-analysis of all published studies of sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy for staging patients with melanoma.

METHODS

Published literature in all languages between 1990 and 2009 was critically appraised. Primary outcomes evaluated included the proportion successfully mapped (PSM) and test performance including false-negative rate (FNR), post-test probability negative (PTPN), and positive predictive value in the same nodal basin recurrence.

RESULTS

A total of 71 studies including 25,240 patients met full eligibility criteria. The average PSM was 98.1% (95% CI, 97.3% to 98.6%) and increased with the year of publication, female sex, ulceration, age, and the quality score of the studies. The FNR ranged from 0.0% to 34.0%, averaging 12.5% overall (95% CI, 11% to 14.2%). FNR increased with the length of follow-up (P = .002) but decreased with greater PSM (P = .001). PTPN averaged 3.4% (95% CI, 3.0% to 3.8%), which also increased in studies with longer follow-up, younger age, female sex, deeper Breslow thickness, and with tumor ulceration while decreasing with greater PSM (P < .001). Approximately 20% of the patients with a positive SLN had additional lymph nodes in the complete lymph node dissection and 7.5% of the patients with positive SLN developed recurrence in the same nodal basin which was greater in studies that also reported higher FNR (P = .01).

CONCLUSION

The estimated risk of nodal recurrence after a negative SLN biopsy was ≤ 5% supporting the use of this technology for staging patients with melanoma.

Prognostic value of tyrosinase reverse transcriptase PCR analysis in melanoma sentinel lymph nodes: long-term follow-up analysis

OBJECTIVE

To determine the prognostic value of detecting tyrosinase transcripts in melanoma sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs).

METHODS

Reverse transcription (RT) PCR for tyrosinase mRNA was performed on negative SLNs of 76 patients with melanoma.

RESULTS

Tyrosinase mRNA was found in 39 patients (51.3%). After a median follow-up period of 51 months, significant differences were found in overall survival (OS) but not in disease-free survival (DFS). The 5-year OS and DFS rates were 97.2% and 80%, respectively, for RT-PCR tyrosinase-negative (TN) patients vs. 78.67% and 66.24% for RT-PCR tyrosinase-positive (TP) patients (P = 0.019 and P = 0.38, respectively). Of four progressing patients in the TN group, three relapsed with subcutaneous, soft-tissue or lymph-node metastases, while seven out of nine progressing patients in the TP group relapsed at visceral sites.

CONCLUSIONS

No significant differences in DFS were found by RT-PCR tyrosinase expression analysis at melanoma SLNs. Significant differences in OS could be related to a different pattern of relapse and must be confirmed after a longer follow-up time.

Molecular staging of pathologically negative sentinel lymph nodes from melanoma patients using multimarker, quantitative real-time rt-PCR

The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic potential of quantitative reverse-transcription, polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) in melanoma patients with pathologically negative sentinel lymph nodes (SLN). Our study included 195 node-negative melanoma patients with a Breslow thickness greater than 0.76 mm (n = 158), or less than 0.76 mm but who had Clark level IV-V, microscopic ulceration, or pathological signs of regression (n = 32), and five patients with melanoma of unknown thickness. SLNs were examined by serial-section histopathology. A portion of each SLN was frozen for qRT-PCR analysis using markers Tyrosinase, MART1, SSX2, MAGEA3, PAX3, and GalNAc-T. In addition, two other markers (PLAB and L1CAM) were evaluated for melanoma specificity but not for SLN analysis. Median follow-up was 64 months, during which time there were 15 (7.7%) recurrences. A total of 370 lymph nodes were analyzed by qRT-PCR. No association was found between quantitative expression level of any marker and disease recurrence. Previously published primer designs were tested for PAX3 and GalNAc-T and revealed that alternative PAX3 transcripts are differentially expressed in melanoma and benign lymph nodes. No associations with recurrence were found regardless of the transcripts amplified by different primer sets. PLAB and L1CAM did not appear to differentiate between malignant melanoma and benign melanocytes or lymph nodes in our analysis. We conclude that, in this large cohort of patients, multimarker qRT-PCR analysis of SLNs did not correlate with disease recurrence. Our data support specific PAX3 splice variants but not GalNAc-T, PLAB or L1CAM as possible markers for melanoma metastasis to SLNs.

Sentinel lymph node as a target of molecular diagnosis of lymphatic micrometastasis and local immunoresponse to malignant cells

The sentinel lymph node (SLN) is defined as the lymph node(s) first receiving lymphatic drainage from the site of the primary tumor. The histopathological status of SLN is one of the most significant predictors of recurrence and overall survival for most clinical stage I/II solid tumors. Recent progress in molecular techniques has demonstrated the presence of micrometastatic tumor cells in SLN. There is now a growing body of data to support the clinical relevance of SLN micrometastasis in a variety of solid tumors. Increasing the sensitivity of occult tumor cell detection in the SLN, using molecular-based analysis, should enable a more accurate understanding of the clinical significance of various patterns of micrometastatic nodal disease. The establishment of metastasis to SLN might not be simply reflected by the flow dynamics of lymphatic fluid that drains from the primary site to the SLN, and the transportation of viable cancer cells. Recent studies have demonstrated that primary tumors can actively induce lymphangiogenesis and promote SLN metastasis. Moreover chemokine receptors in tumor cells may facilitate organ-specific tumor metastasis in many human cancers and some experimental models. In contrast, recent clinical and preclinical studies regard SLN as the first lymphoid organ to respond to tumor antigenic stimulation. SLN dramatically show morphological, phenotypical and functional changes that indicate immune suppression by tumor cells. The immune suppression in SLN results in failure of prevention or eradication of tumor metastasis. The mechanism of immunomodulation remains unclear; however, several regulatory molecules produced by tumor cells and tumor-associated macrophages or lymphocytes are likely to be responsible for inducing the immune suppression in SLN. Further studies may develop a novel immunotherapy that overcomes tumor-induced immune suppression and can prevent or eradicate SLN metastasis.

Sentinel lymph node molecular ultrastaging in patients with melanoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prognosis

PURPOSE

Molecular biology-based ultrastaging of cancer is already part of the standard management of patients with hematologic malignancies, whereas the evidence for solid tumors is much more debated. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) -based detection of melanoma cells in sentinel lymph nodes (SLN) of patients with melanoma represents an appealing prognostic tool. However, no consensus exists on the clinical implementation of this prognostic indicator for the management of these patients.

METHODS

Twenty-two studies enrolling 4,019 patients who underwent SLN biopsy for clinical stage I to II cutaneous melanoma were reviewed. Correlation of PCR status with TNM stage, disease recurrence rates, and survival was assessed by means of association statistics and formal meta-analysis, respectively.

RESULTS

PCR status correlated with both TNM stage (stage I to II v III; PCR positivity, 95.1% v 46.6%; P < .0001) and disease recurrence (PCR positive v negative; relapse rate, 16.8% v 8.7%; P < .0001). PCR positivity was also associated with worse overall (hazard ratio [HR], 5.08; 95% CI, 1.83 to 14.08; P = .002) and disease-free (HR, 3.41; 95% CI, 1.86 to 6.24; P < .0001) survival. Statistical heterogeneity was significant, underscoring the variability among overall effect estimates across studies; metaregression and subgroup analysis did not identify clear-cut sources of heterogeneity, although some study design variables were suggested as potential causes.

CONCLUSION

PCR status of SLN appears to have a clinically valuable prognostic power in patients with melanoma. Although the heterogeneity of the studies so far published warrants caution to avoid overestimating the favorable results of pooled data, our findings strongly support additional investigation in this field.

Clinical significance of the RT-PCR positive sentinel node in melanoma

BACKGROUND

The clinical relevance of RT-PCR positivity for melanoma markers in the sentinel node remains controversial. Our purpose was to determine whether patients with a histologically negative but RT-PCR positive node were at an increased risk for recurrence than their RT-PCR negative counterparts.

METHODS

Thirty-nine adult patients underwent sentinel node biopsies for melanoma between 1998 and 2000. Each sentinel node was bivalved. Half was serially sectioned and examined by routine hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and immunohistochemistry (IHC; S100, HMB-45, melanA, and tyrosinase). The other half was analyzed by a nested RT-PCR assay for tyrosinase.

RESULTS

Patients were followed for recurrence with a mean follow-up of 71.1 months. The odds ratio of recurrence for RT-PCR positive versus RT-PCR negative patients was 1.39 (0.34, 5.62; p = 0.73). Within the histology negative subgroups, the risk of recurrence in the RT-PCR positive group (26.7%) was not significantly different from the risk of recurrence in the RT-PCR negative group (22.2%) (p = 0.33 chi-squared). RT-PCR of the sentinel node was not a predictor for recurrence on multivariate analysis (p = 0.65).

CONCLUSION

Sentinel node RT-PCR positivity did not risk stratify histologically negative melanoma patients beyond routine pathologic examination in this series.

Prospective Multi-Institutional Study of Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction for Molecular Staging of Melanoma

Purpose

To evaluate the prognostic significance of molecular staging using reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) in detecting occult melanoma cells in sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) and circulating bloodstream.

Patients and Methods

In this multicenter study, eligibility criteria included patient age 18 to 71 years, invasive melanoma ≥ 1.0 mm Breslow thickness, and no clinical evidence of metastasis. SLN biopsy and wide excision of the primary tumor were performed. SLNs were examined by serial-section histopathology and S-100 immunohistochemistry. A portion of each SLN was frozen for RT-PCR. In addition, RT-PCR was performed on peripheral-blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). RT-PCR analysis was performed using four markers: tyrosinase, MART1, MAGE3, and GP-100. Disease-free survival (DFS), distant–DFS (DDFS), and overall survival (OS) were analyzed.

Results

A total of 1,446 patients with histologically negative SLNs underwent RT-PCR analysis. At a median follow-up of 30 months, there was no difference in DFS, DDFS, or OS between the RT-PCR–positive (n = 620) and RT-PCR–negative (n = 826) patients. Analysis of PBMC from 820 patients revealed significant differences in DFS and DDFS, but not OS, for patients with detection of more than one RT-PCR marker in peripheral blood.

Conclusion

In this large, prospective, multi-institutional study, RT-PCR analysis on SLNs and PBMCs provides no additional prognostic information beyond standard histopathologic analysis of SLNs. Detection of more than one marker in PBMC is associated with a worse prognosis. RT-PCR remains investigational and should not be used to direct adjuvant therapy at this time.

Prognostic significance of molecular staging study of sentinel lymph nodes by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction for tyrosinase in melanoma patients

BACKGROUND

We performed this study to evaluate the clinical effect of microscopic and submicroscopic metastases in sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) from patients with early-stage melanoma.

METHODS

Patients with confirmed cutaneous melanoma (American Joint Committee on Cancer stages I and II) underwent standard lymphoscintigraphy and SLN biopsy. Serial sections were divided between routine histopathology with hematoxylin and eosin plus immunohistochemistry for HMB-45 and molecular analysis by nested reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assay for tyrosinase (using beta-actin as a control).

RESULTS

Of 180 patients analyzed (318 SLNs), 38 (21%) patients had positive SLN(s) by routine hematoxylin and eosin and immunohistochemistry (microscopic disease; group 1), and 142 (79%) had negative histological results. Analysis by RT-PCR detected tyrosinase in at least 1 SLN from 124 (69%) patients. Among patients with histologically negative SLN(s), tyrosinase was detected in 86 (48%) patients (submicroscopic disease; group 2), whereas 40 (22%) patients had negative results by both histology and RT-PCR (group 3). Sixteen (9%) patients had histologically negative SLNs and ambiguous RT-PCR results (group 4). Among 138 patients in the analysis of recurrence (mean follow-up, 45 months), only 18 patients had a recurrence: 11 (31%) of 35 in group 1, 5 (10%) of 51 in group 2, and 2 (5%) of 37 in group 3. No recurrences were seen in group 4. Only group 1 had a significantly shorter disease-free survival and overall survival compared with the other groups.

CONCLUSIONS

After a long follow-up period, molecular upstaging by tyrosinase RT-PCR failed to detect a subgroup of patients with an increased probability of recurrence.

Single-Institution Experience in the Management of Patients with Clinical Stage I and II Cutaneous Melanoma: Results of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in 240 Cases

BACKGROUND

Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) has been developed as a minimally invasive technique to determine the pathologic status of regional lymph nodes in patients without clinically palpable disease and incorporated in the latest version of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system for cutaneous melanoma.

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the results of SLNB and the prognostic value of the micrometastases and the pattern of early recurrences in patients according to sentinel lymph node (SLN) status.

METHOD

Patients with cutaneous melanoma in stages I and II (AJCC 2002) who underwent lymphatic mapping and SLNB from 1997 to 2003 were included in a prospective database for analysis.

RESULTS

The rate of identification of the SLN was 100%. Micrometastases to SLN were found in 20.8% of patients. The rate of SLN micrometastases increased according to Breslow thickness and clinical stage. Breslow thickness of 0.99 mm was the optimal cutpoint for predicting the SLNB result. Twenty-four patients (12.3%) developed a locoregional or distant recurrence at a median follow-up of 31 months. Recurrences were more frequent in patients with a positive SLN. Among patients who had a recurrence, those with a positive SLN were more likely to have distant metastases than those with negative SLN. Nodal recurrences were more frequent in patients with a negative SLN compared with those with a positive SLN.

CONCLUSIONS

The status of the SLN provides accurate staging for identifying patients who may benefit from further therapy and is the most important prognostic factor of relapse-free survival.

Molecular staging of the sentinel lymph node in melanoma patients: correlation with clinical outcome

BACKGROUND

This study was designed to determine the debated prognostic significance of reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) positivity in melanoma patients' sentinel lymph node (SLN) negative by conventional histopathology (PATH).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with primary stage I-II cutaneous melanoma underwent radioguided sentinel lymphadenectomy. Their SLNs were assessed for tyrosinase (Tyr) and melanoma antigens recognized by T-cells (MART-1) mRNA expression using RT-PCR, in parallel with hematoxylin and eosin staining and immunohistochemistry. Tyr and MART-1 expression in the SLNs were correlated with PATH assay results, standard prognostic factors, time to progression and overall survival.

RESULTS

Twenty-three of the 124 patients (18.5%) had positive SLNs by both PATH and RT-PCR (PATH+/PCR+). Sixteen patients (13%) were negative by PATH and positive by RT-PCR (PATH-/PCR+). Eighty-five patients (68.5%) had SLNs that were negative by both PATH and RT-PCR (PATH-/PCR-). At a median follow-up of 30 months, recurrence rates among the three cohorts were statistically different (PATH+/PCR+, 60%; PATH-/PCR+, 31%; PATH-/PCR-, 9.4%). Seven of 23 (30%) and two of 16 (12.5%) patients died in the PATH+/PCR+ and PATH-/PCR+ SLN groups, respectively, whereas no patient died in the PATH-/PCR- SLN group.

CONCLUSIONS

RT-PCR is more sensitive than PATH to detect SLN metastases and it is a reliable predictor of disease relapse in stage I-II melanoma patients.

Molecular classification of melanoma using real-time quantitative reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction

BACKGROUND

The early detection and characterization of metastatic melanoma are important for prognosis and management of the disease. Molecular methods are more sensitive in detecting occult lymph node metastases compared with standard histopathology and are reported to have utility in clinical diagnostics.

METHODS

Using real-time quantitative reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction ([q]RT-PCR), the authors examined 36 samples (30 melanomas, 4 benign nevi, and 2 reactive lymph nodes) for the expression of 20 melanoma-related genes that function in cell growth and differentiation (epidermal growth factor receptor [EGFR], WNT5A, BRAF, FOS, JUN, MATP, and TMP1), cell proliferation (KI-67, TOP2A, BUB1, BIRC5, and STK6), melanoma progression (CD63, MAGEA3, and GALGT), and melanin synthesis (TYR, MLANA, SILV, PAX3, and MITF). In addition, samples were tested for mutations in BRAF (exons 11 and 15) and NRAS (exons 2 and 3).

RESULTS

Hierarchical clustering analysis of the expression data was able to distinguish between the melanoma and nonmelanoma samples and further stratified the melanoma samples into two groups differentiated by high expression of the genes involved in beta-catenin activation (EGFR and WNT5A) and the MAPK/ERK pathway (BRAF, FOS, and JUN). Eighteen of the 28 patients (64%) were found to have mutations in either exon 15 of BRAF (V599 substitution) or codon 61 of NRAS. The mutations were mutually exclusive and did not appear to be associated with the different expression subtypes.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of the current study demonstrate that real-time qRT-PCR can be analyzed using hierarchical clustering to identify expression patterns that differentiate between melanomas and other tissue types. Using a supervised analysis of the data, the authors found that the best discriminators for molecularly distinguishing between melanoma, benign nevi, and lymph nodes were MLANA, CD63, and BUB1. These markers could have diagnostic utility for the detection of melanoma micrometastasis in sentinel lymph nodes.

Tumor cell and circulating markers in melanoma: Diagnosis, prognosis, and management

The search is on for biomarkers for use in the diagnosis, staging, prognosis, and management of patients with melanoma. As with many types of cancer, the hematogenous spread of melanoma is a bad prognostic sign, and many groups have attempted to detect circulating melanoma cells in patients with different stages of melanoma. Some studies have used direct extraction of intact tumor cells from the peripheral blood and others the detection of surrogate markers of circulating melanoma cells, such as tyrosinase or MART-1. However, a correlation between the detection of intact melanoma cells in the circulation and prognosis is controversial. Many other biomarkers have also been studied, including lactate dehydrogenase, S100, TA90, and C-reactive protein. Much progress has been made, and preliminary studies have shown promise with many of these markers. Finally, the detection of tumor-specific circulating DNA has shown promise as a prognostic and diagnostic marker of disease in melanoma as well. In this review we examine the most promising biomarkers for use in patients with cutaneous melanoma.

Sentinel lymph node: detection of micrometastases of melanoma in a molecular study

INTRODUCTION

Lymph node status in patients with cutaneous malignant melanoma is the most important prognostic factor. Patients with clinically positive nodes (stage III) should undergo therapeutic lymphadenectomy; however, the surgical approach to the regional disease in patients with negative clinical examination (stage I and II) is still controversial. Selective lymphadenectomy consists of the intraoperative identification of the first node in the nodal basin, the sentinel lymph node (SLN). Routine examination, serial sectioning, and immunohistochemistry may underestimate the presence of tumor cells. PCR is a molecular biology technique that may be useful for the detection of malignant melanoma nodal metastases in the SLN.

AIM

The aim of this study was to use tyrosinase messenger RNA (mRNA) amplification for the detection of micrometastases in fresh frozen SLNs.

METHODS

46 hematoxylin-eosin (HE)-negative sentinel node samples from 42 patients with malignant melanoma were included in this study. Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded sections were immunostained with S-100 protein and HMB-45. A central portion of the node was submitted for PCR. This method was accomplished with a combination of reverse transcription and amplification of the tyrosinase complementary DNA and double- round PCR (nested reverse transcriptase [RT]-PCR).

RESULTS

In 1 of the 42 SLN-negative patients, immunohistochemistry stains allowed the detection of micrometastases. With molecular biology, 14 of the 42 SLN patients were positive (33%); in another 12 (29%), only the nested RT-PCR was positive. Of the 42 patients, 24 were put into 3 groups and followed for a 5-year period with 1, 7, and 16 patients, respectively, in the groups. The first group involved 1 patient who had provided 2 SLN samples that were found to be SLN-positive using both techniques, immunohistochemistry stains and nested RT-PCR (he had hepatic metastasis and died 24 months after diagnosis). The second group, with only nested RT-PCR positive SLN samples, included 7 of 12 patients who were followed and had a median survival of 37 months; 4 died of widespread metastatic disease, the other 3 patients had event-free survival, but 1 consented to undergo a therapeutic lymphadenectomy as a result of a positive test. The last group consisting of 16 of 32 patients, with complete 5-year survival, who were SLN-negative with both techniques, immunohistochemistry stains and nested RT-PCR. Fourteen of the 16 (88%) were event-free survival during the follow-up, and 2 had local relapse.

CONCLUSION

Tyrosinase mRNA amplification may be a negative prognostic factor for the detection of micrometastases in fresh frozen SLNs using molecular biology techniques.

[Value of sentinel node biopsy considering melanoma management as an example]

Sentinel lymph node biopsy has replaced elective lymph node dissection in the management of melanoma. It provides an exact staging method of the regional lymph basin and is associated with low morbidity. Patients who are found to have a positive sentinel lymph node can selectively undergo regional lymph node dissection. Sentinel lymph node biopsy also provides the means to stratify patients into homogeneous groups for adjuvant therapies. Sentinel lymph node involvement is regarded as an independent prognostic factor. The therapeutic value of subsequent surgical and medical therapies in patients with positive sentinel nodes is currently being investigated in clinical trials.

Clinical and biological aspects of sentinel node biopsy in malignant melanoma — an update

The diagnostic usefulness of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) has been well established, but its therapeutic value remains unproven. First introduced by Morton and colleagues, the SLNB procedure is now widely available, and markedly enhances our ability to pathologically stage the regional nodes. Although the SLN status is acknowledged as the most powerful indicator of prognosis in melanoma, there is no evidence to-date, of survival advantage for complete lymphadenectomy in SLN-positive patients. Also, there is no effective adjuvant therapy that could benefit these sentinel node-positive patients, as yet. Additionally, new data have emerged indicating a possible increase in local/in-transit recurrence following complete lymphadenectomy in sentinel node-positive patients. To understand fully and to evaluate these observations we need information from randomized controlled trials. Major changes have occurred following the latest revision of melanoma staging system (AJCC, 6th edition). Concerning N category, these include the incorporation of the number of metastatic lymph nodes, the tumour burden of nodal metastases, and the ulceration of the primary tumour. The data obtained from the new staging system will reflect differences in prognosis that were not previously emphasized and which, we hope, will serve as a guide to more accurate analysis of metastatic pathways in cutaneous melanoma as well as a rationale for new forms of treatment.

Serial Follow-Up and the Prognostic Significance of Reverse Transcriptase-Polymerase Chain Reaction—Staged Sentinel Lymph Nodes From Melanoma Patients

Purpose

Reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) may provide an extremely sensitive method for detection of occult nodal disease. We evaluated the role of a single-marker RT-PCR assay for tyrosinase mRNA in the detection of melanoma sentinel lymph node (SLN) metastases and correlated the results with long-term clinical outcome.

Patients and Methods

One hundred twelve patients who underwent SLN biopsy for melanoma were prospectively analyzed. SLNs were bivalved, with half of each specimen evaluated by histologic methods and the other half evaluated by nested RT-PCR for tyrosinase.

Results

Fifteen patients (13%) had histologically positive SLNs, all of whom were also positive by RT-PCR (HISTO+/PCR+). Thirty-nine patients (35%) had SLNs that were negative by both histology and RT-PCR (HISTO−/PCR−). Fifty-eight patients (52%) were histologically negative but upstaged with a positive RT-PCR result (HISTO−/PCR+). Initially, at a median follow-up of 42 months, recurrence rates among the three cohorts were statistically different (HISTO+/PCR+, 53%; HISTO−/PCR+, 14%; and HISTO−/PCR−, 0%). However, at a longer median follow-up (67 months), recurrence rates for the HISTO−/PCR+ (24%) and HISTO−/PCR− (15%) groups were no longer statistically different (P = .25). The median time to relapse between the HISTO−/PCR+ and HISTO−/PCR− groups differed by 10 months (31 v 41 months, respectively).

Conclusion

With extended follow-up of patients with histologically negative SLNs, detection of submicroscopic disease by tyrosinase RT-PCR does not define a subgroup that is at higher recurrence risk when compared with patients with RT-PCR–negative SLNs. Future studies evaluating molecular staging will require approximately 5 years of median follow-up to accurately define outcome for patients with occult melanoma metastases.

Features of sentinel lymph nodes for melanoma may lead to re-diagnosis of the cutaneous primary: an unusual case and review of literature

Although sentinel lymph-node biopsy is accepted as a reliable method of staging of melanoma, it is not without problems to the pathologist. It has been re-emphasised that aggregates of benign naevus cells are not uncommon. Usually these are easily identified by a combination of their benign cytology and location in the fibrous skeleton of lymph nodes. This case represents a combination of an unusual pseudo-malignant pattern in the primary lesion with unusual morphology of the sentinel lymph node. The latter prompted reassessment of the cutaneous lesion as a benign naevus. Confirmation of the diagnosis as cutaneous melanoma by a positive sentinel-node biopsy was averted only by a careful comparison of unusual features of the putative primary and the sentinel lymph node. This case illustrates the need for a rigorous protocol for pathological assessment of sentinel lymph nodes for melanomas to assure detection of all metastases but also to avoid misdiagnosis and over-treatment. It also supports "benign metastases" as the mechanism underlying at least some melanocytes in regional lymph nodes.

[Sentinel lymph node in melanoma]

The procedure of sentinel node biopsy (SNB) has emerged as an important advance especially with respect to staging of malignant melanoma. Elective (prophylactic) lymph node dissection that had been practiced in primary melanoma with a suspected increased risk of (clinically occult) lymphatic metastasis has been replaced by SNB. Patients with proven metastatic involvement of the sentinel node (12-25%) can be specifically selected for regional lymph node dissection. Metastatic involvement of the sentinel node (SN) is a significant independent prognostic factor. The value of detecting metastasis by highly sensitive diagnostic tools such as RT-PCR is just as uncertain as is the therapeutic benefit of operative or conservative therapies in sentinel node-positive patients with respect to improving prognosis and is currently under study.

Sentinel lymph node biopsy progress in surgical treatment of cancer

BACKGROUND

Forty-three years after the first description of the sentinel lymph node technique in malignant tumours of the parotid by Gould, sentinel lymph node biopsy (SNLB) has become a precious tool in the treatment of solid tumours.

METHODS

In the following review we give a synopsis of the fundamentals of the sentinel lymph node concept and then proceed to an overview of recent advances of SNLB in gastrointestinal cancers.

RESULTS

In some tumour entities, SNLB has been shown to reflect reliably the lymph node status of the tumour-draining lymph node basin. In melanoma and breast cancer, it became a widely accepted element of the routine surgical management of these malignant diseases. In gastrointestinal tumours, the technique is currently under intense investigation. First reports on its application in other solid tumours, such as non-small cell lung cancer, thyroid carcinoma, oropharyngeal carcinoma, vulvar carcinoma, and Merckel cell carcinoma of the skin, were published more recently.

CONCLUSION

SNLB has become an important component of diagnosis and treatment of solid tumours. A growing number of publications on SNLB in gastrointestinal cancer documents the interest of many investigators in the application of this technique in this tumour entity. As long as imaging techniques like 18FDG PET or other molecular imaging techniques are limited by their spatial resolution, SNLB remains the technique of choice for lympho-nodal staging.

The new staging system for cutaneous melanoma in the era of lymphatic mapping

In 2002, the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) revised the staging system for cutaneous melanoma on the basis of a survival analysis of important melanoma prognostic factors. Features of the revised system include new strata for primary tumor thickness, incorporation of primary tumor ulceration as an important staging criterion in both the tumor (T) and node (N) classifications, revision of the N classification to reflect the prognostic significance of regional nodal tumor burden, and new categories for distant metastatic disease. These changes reflect evolving insight into melanoma arising from the results of numerous clinical investigations and database analyses. One of the most important recent changes in melanoma care is the establishment of lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy as a highly accurate and minimally morbid technique for pathologic regional nodal staging. In this article, the salient features of the revised melanoma staging system are examined, with specific attention paid to its use in this era of lymphatic mapping and SLN biopsy.