Acid reflux test for gastroesophageal reflux after distal gastrectomy: diagnosis and clinical effect of cisapride

Effect of semifundoplication with subtotal gastrectomy for prevention of postoperative gastroesophageal reflux

BACKGROUND

Postgastrectomy patients often experience reflux esophagitis and a compromised quality of life. We hypothesized that reconstructive methods with antireflux procedures at operation should prevent reflux esophagitis and improve the likelihood of a better quality of life in patients after distal gastrectomy for gastric carcinoma. Our antireflux procedure was a subdiaphragmatic semifundoplication. We aim to substantiate, with objective arguments, potential advantages of Billroth I simple reconstruction versus Billroth I with semifundoplication.

STUDY DESIGN

This study evaluated 60 patients who had Billroth I reconstruction with semifundoplication (30 patients; F group) and simple Billroth I reconstruction (30 patients; B group) after distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Assessments were made preoperatively and 6 months or later after surgical intervention. Results of the procedure, clinical evaluation (reflux symptoms), and esophageal alkaline reflux by ambulatory 24-hour pH memory were satisfactory.

RESULTS

Operative evaluation time and procedural complications did not differ significantly between the two gastrectomy groups. Reflux symptoms only occurred in 12 patients in the B group. Lower esophageal sphincter pressure of patients in the B group was significantly lower than that of patients in the F group and in preoperative states (p < 0.05). The mean appearance of alkaline esophageal reflux in the F group and the B group were 2.6% and 13.6%, respectively (p < 0.01). Patients with semifundoplication had a significantly better quality of life and less physiologic regurgitation than patients with simple Billroth I.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated that Billroth I reconstruction with semifundoplication for gastric cancer is not only effective for patients with a postoperative life expectancy, but also prevents reflux esophagitis after gastrectomy. We believe that our method is an effective and simple surgical option for many patients with gastric cancer.

Evaluation of gastroesophageal reflux disease following various reconstructive procedures for a distal gastrectomy

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Some patients develop gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) after a distal gastrectomy. In these patients, the evaluation of GERD with 24-h pH monitoring could be difficult because they may have an insufficient amount of gastric acid.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

To evaluate GERD following a distal gastrectomy, we retrospectively evaluated 38 patients postoperatively with an acid reflux test (ART), a barium study, endoscopy, and esophageal manometry. Three reconstructive procedures, Billroth I (B-I group: 14 patients), Billroth II (B-II group: 11 patients), and jejunal interposition (interposition group: 13 patients) were compared with respect to GERD and short- term operation results.

RESULTS

Operation time and postoperative hospital stay were longest in the interposition group. Reflux symptoms were present in ten patients (26%). The ART, barium study and endoscopy demonstrated evidence of GERD in 22 (58%), 10 (26%) and 4 (11%) of the 38 patients, respectively. The frequency of a positive ART in the interposition group was significantly lower than in both the B-I and the B-II groups. The abdominal length of the lower esophageal sphincter in the interposition group was higher than that in the B-II group ( P<0.05).

CONCLUSION

Although jejunal interposition required longer operation time and hospital stay, the lower esophageal sphincter function following jejunal interposition appears to be superior to that following a Billroth-I or Billroth-II procedure.