Current standards for dialysis adequacy

Double target comparison of blood-side methods for measuring the hemodialysis dose

BACKGROUND

Despite the fact that urea kinetic modelling has been successfully applied to quantify the hemodialysis since the beginning of the 1980s, there is not a consensus yet concerning which is the most proper dialysis dose index and the method for calculating it. In this work, we propose that a combined measurement of the dialysis dose from two complementary perspectives of the removal process should provide a more complete description of dialysis than a measurement alone. This hypothesis is reviewed and the measuring methods are compared.

METHODS

A cross-sectional randomized clinical study over 98 stable ESRD patients submitted to thrice-weekly hemodialysis was carried out with the aim of comparing 16 blood-side methods for measuring the hemodialysis dose from patient and dialyzer perspectives. The availability of urea rebound measurements and computational resources have been taken into account.

RESULTS

The outcomes point to four novel blood-side methods as the most accurate for measuring the effective dialysis system Kt/V (mKt/V) in clinical conditions. Their limits of agreement (mean +/- 2.SD) range from 1.93 +/- 2.09% for a non-iterative method without the urea rebound measurement (BUN3) to -0.08 +/- 0.58% for an iterative method with BUN3. The best non-iterative blood-side method for measuring the equilibrated Kt/V (eKt/V) is the second generation formula of Daugirdas (-2.42 +/- 1.05%) when BUN3 is available and the rate equation of Daugirdas and Schneditz (-1.74 +/- 7.91%) when BUN3 is not available. The difference mKt/V-eKt/V is significant and positive, and increases with the dialysis dose in a personalized manner.

CONCLUSION

We have confirmed the arguments that support the hypothesis of the study. The best blood-side methods for the combined measurement of dialysis dose as a function of the available resources have been determined.

A novel mathematical method based on urea kinetic modeling for computing the dialysis dose

A novel normalized single pool urea kinetic model (nspUKM) for the quantification of the urea removal, dialyzer urea clearance and urea generation rate during a dialysis session, is presented. Its major goal is the computation of an accurate estimate of the fractional dialyzer urea clearance (dKt/V), which is denoted nKt/V, in contrast to the equilibrated Kt/V (eKt/V). This work clarifies the significance of dKt/V as a complement to eKt/V in hemodialysis (HD) prescription and quantification. This new model emerges from a generalization of the standard single pool urea kinetic model (spUKM) of the US National Cooperative Dialysis Study (NCDS), identified as gspUKM. Due to their significance, the standard single pool Kt/V (spKt/V) and the eKt/V are also analyzed from gspUKM in this work, with the aim of achieving a better interpretation of the results. Indices nKt/V, eKt/V and spKt/V have been compared with the dKt/V computed from a published and validated two-pool urea kinetic model (2pUKM). We present the results obtained from a clinical study carried out on a group of 30 end stage renal disease (ESRD) patients. The limits of agreement (mean+/-2S.D. (standard deviation) of the difference) between nKt/V and 2pKt/V were -0.077+/-0.72% (percentage of the dKt/V mean), while between eKt/V and 2pKt/V were -13.75+/-17.39% and between spKt/V and 2pKt/V were -1.61+/-6.54%. These scores prove that the nspUKM model is able to provide a very accurate estimate of 2pKt/V and thus dKt/V, even with high flux (HF) HD. The presented method joins the simplicity of single-pool models to the accuracy of double-pool models, when the target is the identification of the dialyzer urea clearance, urea removal and urea generation rate, although it does not provide a good prediction of the urea dynamics. Finally, we think that our analytical and experimental findings throw light on the behavior and applicability of the different Kt/V indices analyzed.

Near-Infrared Spectroscopy for Measuring Urea in Hemodialysis Fluids

Background: Near-infrared spectroscopy is proposed as a method for providing real-time urea concentrations during hemodialysis treatments. The feasibility of such noninvasive urea measurements is evaluated in undiluted dialysate fluid.

Methods: Near-infrared spectra were collected from calibration solutions of urea prepared in dialysate fluid. Spectra were collected over three distinct spectral regions, and partial least-squares calibration models were optimized and compared for each. Selectivity for urea was demonstrated with two-component samples composed of urea and glucose in the dialysate matrix. The clinical significance of this approach was assessed by measuring urea in real hemodialysate samples.

Results: Urea absorptions within the combination and short-wavelength, near-infrared spectral regions provided sufficient spectral information for sound calibration models in the dialysate matrix. The combination spectral region had SEs of calibration (SEC) and prediction (SEP) of 0.38 mmol/L and 0.26 mmol/L, respectively, over the 4720–4600 cm−1 spectral range with 5 partial least-square factors. A second calibration model was established over the combination region from a series of solutions prepared with independently variable concentrations of urea and glucose. The best calibration model for urea in the presence of variable glucose concentrations had a SEC of 0.6 mmol/L and a SEP of 0.4 mmol/L for a 5-factor model over the 4600–4350 cm−1 spectral range. There was no significant decrease in SEP when the 4720–4600 cm−1 calibration model was used to measure urea in real samples collected during actual hemodialysis.

Conclusions: Urea can be determined with sufficient sensitivity and selectivity for clinical measurements within the matrix of the hemodialysis fluid.