Teaching radiology residents, and radiology residents as teachers

A Novel Hands-on Approach Towards Teaching Diagnostic Radiology Residents MRI Scanning and Physics

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

Traditional approaches towards teaching magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanning and physics have limitations that a hands-on course may help overcome. A dedicated week of MRI instruction may help improve radiology resident confidence and competence. Additional benefits may include improved physician-technologist communication and accelerated mastery of MRI safety.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Surveys and tests were approved by our Program Evaluation Committee and administered at the beginning and at the end of this one-week course. The course consisted of protected reading time as well as practice scanning with a research magnet and assisting with clinical scanning under the close supervision of a licensed MRI technologist. Eighteen senior residents (nine third-year and nine fourth-year) participated in this course during its first year.

RESULTS

Few residents had previous experience with MRI physics, scanning, or research prior to residency. After this course, mean resident confidence increased by 0.47 points (3.33 vs 2.86; p=0.01) on a five-point Likert scale. Understanding of MRI physics, as measured by pre- and post-tests, increased by 22% (0.72 vs 0.50; p<0.01), corresponding to a large effect size of 1.29 (p<0.001). Resident feedback reported that this course was efficacious (5/5), engaging (4.9/5), and had optimal faculty oversight. The most highly rated component of the course was the opportunity to experiment with the research MR scanner (5/5).

CONCLUSION

A dedicated week of MRI education was highly rated by residents and associated with improvements in confidence and understanding, suggesting a positive correlation between confidence and competence. Additional metrics, such as trends in scores on the American Board of Radiology's Core Examination over the next several years, may further support the apparent benefits of this hands-on MR course.

Australian students' perspective on interventional radiology education: A prospective cross-institutional study

INTRODUCTION

As interventional radiology (IR) adopts an increasingly pivotal role within therapeutic medicine, it is essential that medical students gain exposure to IR so as future doctors, they can fulfil the growing demand for interventional radiologists (IRs) and make appropriate referrals to IRs. Nonetheless, several international studies have reported no or little representation of IR in medical schools. Our study aims to assess the current awareness, exposure, knowledge and attitudes about IR among Australian medical students, so as to provide preliminary data on whether IR teaching in Australian medical schools needs improvement.

METHODS

A prospective cross-sectional study was conducted via web-based and in-person distribution of a voluntary, anonymous questionnaire.

RESULTS

A total of 237 complete responses were received from approximately 1400 clinical-based students (17% response rate); 38% of respondents had never witnessed an IR procedure, 39% witnessed 1-2 and the remainder, 3-5. Few students reported adequate teaching or knowledge in IR (7% and 5% respectively). Of the 32% of the students considering a career in IR, males predominated (25% of females vs. 59% of males, OR = 0.48, 95%, CI = 0.27-0.83, P = 0.008). Most students agree that IR should be in the university curriculum (59%) and is key to improving healthcare (74%). Senior students were more likely to report adequate teaching (P < 0.001) and believe that IR teaching is important (P = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Australian medical students have a strong appreciation for IR despite having suboptimal teaching, exposure and knowledge in IR. In order to complement and sustain the rapid uptake of IR techniques in modern medicine, university curricula require a greater focus on IR.

Pedagogical Approaches to Diagnostic Imaging Education: A Narrative Review of the Literature

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to examine literature on how radiology is taught and learned by both radiology residents and undergraduates in the health professions.

METHODS

A review of the literature was performed using relevant key words. Articles were retrieved through December 2012 using PubMed, ScienceDirect, ERIC, Proquest, and ICL databases along with a manual review of references.

RESULTS

Of the 4716 unique abstracts reviewed by the author, 91 were found to be relevant to the purpose of this study. The literature retrieved reported pedagogical approaches to teaching radiology including the following: problem solving, technology as teacher, independent learning tools, visiting lectureships, case based teaching, and conferences. There was some exploration of the relative effectiveness of educational formats. Suggestions for future research identify 7 areas of relative consistency.

CONCLUSION

Radiology is a clinical skill that requires integration science, clinical information, clinical experiences, and information recorded on diagnostic imaging studies. The research in this area focuses on problem solving, the use of algorithm/scripts, introducing uncertainty in clinical scenarios, incorporating technology in learning environments, active learning techniques, and methods of independent learning. Although the literature in this area is still in its infancy, the research examining the relative effectiveness of these various educational formats is often contradictory, suggesting that this is a complex area of study with numerous factors influencing student learning.

Radiologists as Educators: A Narrative Review of the Literature

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to examine literature on how radiologists are trained to be effective educators for both residents and undergraduates in the health professions.

METHODS

A review of the literature was performed using relevant key words. Articles were retrieved through from 1990 through December 2012 using PubMed, ScienceDirect, ERIC, Proquest, and ICL databases along with a manual review of references.

RESULTS

Of the 4716 unique abstracts reviewed by the author, 51 were found to be relevant to the purpose of this study. Faculty teaching skills seem to be solidified during residency. This may be due to a failure to include scholarship of teaching and learning in education and faculty development. Preliminary research shows that creating opportunity for faculty development is beneficial with much of this literature focused on explaining educational concepts to radiologists.

CONCLUSION

The literature examining faculty training in the area of radiology education is sparse. Several articles address the need for more academic radiologists and the need for better training of academic radiologists. The few articles aimed at providing insight to radiologists in this area introduce basic educational concepts such as lecture creation, examination writing, and learning styles or simply delineating what makes an effective educator.

Exposure to, understanding of, and interest in interventional radiology in American medical students

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

The purposes of this study were to determine the degree to which medical students are exposed to interventional radiology (IR) in medical school, to assess their knowledge of the field, and to gauge their interest in IR as a career choice.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An institutional review board-approved survey was generated using the website www.surveymonkey.com. Medical student participation nationwide was elicited by sending e-mails to administrators of medical schools and radiology residency program directors and asking them to distribute the survey link to their students.

RESULTS

Seven hundred twenty-nine medical students from 21 states responded to the survey. Although 58% of students said they were interested in a hands-on career, only 5.5% of students said they had participated in an IR rotation and only 12.7% were interested in IR. Less than half of the IR domain-related questions used to assess understanding of IR were answered correctly, with greater understanding found among the students who had participated in an IR rotation.

CONCLUSIONS

Exposure to IR in accredited US medical education programs is inconsistent, although interest in the field is moderate among medical students compared with interest in other hands-on specialties. Understanding of IR is limited among the study population. Improved understanding of the field and recruitment could result from greater exposure.

Radiology resident teaching skills improvement: impact of a resident teacher training program

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

Teaching is considered an essential competency for residents to achieve during their training. Instruction in teaching skills may assist radiology residents in becoming more effective teachers and increase their overall satisfaction with teaching. The purposes of this study were to survey radiology residents' teaching experiences during residency and to assess perceived benefits following participation in a teaching skills development course.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study participants were radiology residents with membership in the American Alliance of Academic Chief Residents in Radiology or the Siemens AUR Radiology Resident Academic Development Program who participated in a 1.5-hour workshop on teaching skills development at the 2010 Association of University Radiologists meeting. Participants completed a self-administered, precourse questionnaire that addressed their current teaching strategies, as well as the prevalence and structure of teaching skills training opportunities at their institutions. A second postcourse questionnaire enabled residents to evaluate the seminar and assessed new knowledge and skill acquisition.

RESULTS

Seventy-eight residents completed the precourse and postcourse questionnaires. The vast majority of respondents indicated that they taught medical students (72 of 78 [92.3%]). Approximately 20% of residency programs (17 of 78) provided residents with formal didactic programs on teaching skills. Fewer than half (46.8%) of the resident respondents indicated that they received feedback on their teaching from attending physicians (36 of 77), and only 18% (13 of 78) routinely gave feedback to their own learners. All of the course participants agreed or strongly agreed that this workshop was helpful to them as teachers.

CONCLUSIONS

Few residency programs had instituted resident teacher training curricula. A resident teacher training workshop was perceived as beneficial by the residents, and they reported improvement in their teaching skills.

Radiology residents as teachers: Current status of teaching skills training in United States residency programs

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

Radiology residents often teach medical students and other residents. Workshops developed with the goal of improving resident teaching skills are becoming increasingly common in various fields of medicine. The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence and structure of resident-teacher training opportunities within radiology programs in the United States.

METHOD AND MATERIALS

Program directors with membership in the Association of Program Directors in Radiology (APDR) were surveyed to determine views on a panel of topics related to resident-teacher training programs.

RESULTS

A total of 114 (56%) of 205 APDR members completed an online survey. Approximately one-third (32%) stated that their program provided instruction to residents on teaching skills. The majority of these programs (72%) were established within the last 5 years. Residents provided teaching to medical students (94%) and radiology residents (90%). The vast majority of program directors agreed that it is important for residents to teach (98%) and that these teaching experiences helped residents become better radiologists (85%). Ninety-four percent of program directors felt that the teaching skills of their residents could be improved, and 85% felt that residents would benefit from instruction on teaching methods. Only one-third of program directors felt their program adequately recognized teaching provided by residents.

CONCLUSION

Program directors identified residents as being active contributors to teaching in most programs. Although teaching was viewed as an important skill to develop, few programs had instituted a resident-teacher curriculum. Program directors felt that residents would benefit from structured training to enhance teaching skills. Future studies are needed to determine how best to provide teaching skills training for radiology trainees.