1996 AUR Memorial Award. Densitometric analysis of eccentric vascular stenoses: comparison of CO2 and iodinated contrast media

Feasibility and safety of automated CO2 angiography in peripheral arterial interventions

Carbon dioxide (CO2) gas is an established alternative to iodine contrast during angiography in patients with risk of postcontrast acute kidney injury and in those with history of iodine contrast allergy. Different CO2 delivery systems during angiography are reported in literature, with automated delivery system being the latest. The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and learning curve of an automated CO2 injection system with controlled pressures in peripheral arterial interventions and also to study the patients' tolerance to the system.From January 2018 to October 2019 peripheral arterial interventions were performed in 40 patients (median age-78 years, interquartile range: 69-84 years) using an automated CO2 injection system with customized protocols, with conventional iodine contrast agent used only as a bailout option. The pain and tolerance during the CO2 angiography were evaluated with a visual analog scale at the end of each procedure. The amount of CO2, iodine contrast used, and radiation dose area product for the interventions were also systematically recorded for all procedures. These values were statistically compared in 2 groups, viz first 20 patients where a learning curve was expected vs the rest 20 patients.All procedures were successfully completed without complications. All patients tolerated the CO2 angiography with a median total pain score of 3 (interquartile range: 3-4), with no statistical difference between the groups (P = .529). The 2 groups were statistically comparable in terms of comorbidities and the type of procedures performed (P = .807). The amount of iodine contrast agent used (24.60 ± 6.44 ml vs 32.70 ± 8.70 ml, P = .006) and the radiation dose area product associated were significantly lower in the second group (2160.74 ± 1181.52 μGym2 vs 1531.62 ± 536.47 μGym2, P = .043).Automated CO2 angiography is technically feasible and safe for peripheral arterial interventions and is well tolerated by the patients. With the interventionalist becoming familiar with the technique, better diagnostic accuracy could be obtained using lower volumes of conventional iodine contrast agents and reduction of the radiation dose involved.

The outcomes of carbon dioxide digital subtraction angiography for percutaneous transluminal balloon angioplasty of access circuits and venous routes in hemodialysis patients

The outcomes of carbon dioxide digital subtraction angiography (CO2-DSA) for performing percutaneous transluminal balloon angioplasty (balloon PTA) in hemodialysis patients has not been fully clarified. The purpose was to compare the outcomes of balloon PTA of hemodialysis shunts in terms of vessel patency between patients treated using CO2-DSA and conventional digital subtraction angiography using iodine contrast medium (C-DSA).We retrospectively evaluated 76 patients (38 males and 38 females, mean age: 65.0 ± 14.0 years). They were under hemodialysis and treated with balloon PTA using CO2-DSA or C-DSA at our institution between 2009 and 2016. Mean duration of the follow-up period was 25.59 ± 21.45 months. We compared the patency rates obtained after CO2-DSA-based balloon PTA with those after C-DSA-based balloon PTA. Secondary patency, which was defined as the duration of patency after all further endovascular interventions until surgical repair, was considered as the endpoint in this study.Overall, 19 and 57 patients underwent CO2-DSA- and C-DSA-based balloon PTA, respectively. CO2-DSA- and C-DSA-based balloon PTA produced clinical success rates of 100% and 96.5%, respectively. Blood vessel injury occurred in one patient who underwent C-DSA-based balloon PTA. No major complications occurred in CO2 group. At 24 months, the post-PTA secondary patency rates of CO2-DSA- and C-DSA-based balloon PTA were 94.1% and 93.9%, respectively (P = .9594).CO2-DSA is safe for hemodialysis patients. Compared with C-DSA, CO2-DSA-based balloon PTA produces have a similar secondary patency rate.

Current status of carbon dioxide angiography

OBJECTIVE

Unfamiliarity of endovascular surgeons with carbon dioxide (CO₂) angiography is one of the main reasons for its limited use. This review is intended to familiarize the reader with the principles and applications of that modality.

METHODS

We conducted a comprehensive review of contemporary literature related to CO₂ angiography and its use in the field of vascular and endovascular surgery, including technical details and diagnostic and interventional applications.

RESULTS

Cardinal physicochemical characteristics of CO₂ include buoyancy, ultralow viscosity, and nonmixing with blood. Because of the risk of neurotoxicity, intra-arterial CO₂ angiography should only be performed below the diaphragm. Venous CO₂ angiography can be performed anywhere in the torso and extremities. Ultralow viscosity enables intraprocedural imaging during vascular interventions without the need to exchange for an angiographic catheter. Benefits, advantages, and emerging applications of CO₂ angiography are listed. Potential complications and their avoidance and troubleshooting are discussed.

CONCLUSIONS

CO₂ holds promise as an effective and versatile angiographic contrast agent. It is also a valuable modality for the guidance of endovascular interventions. Current availability of easy to use, safe, and portable CO₂ delivery systems will likely expand the use of that modality even beyond the traditional indications of renal insufficiency and iodinated contrast allergy.

Upper-extremity venography: CO2 versus iodinated contrast material

PURPOSE

To determine prospectively the diagnostic performance of CO(2) venography, by using conventional venography with iodinated contrast material as the reference standard, for the preoperative evaluation of upper-limb and central veins before creation of fistulas for hemodialysis access.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study was approved by the institutional review board, and informed consent was obtained from all patients. Twenty-two patients underwent comparative CO(2) and conventional venography of upper-extremity and central veins. Two independent observers evaluated the opacification of the veins and grade of stenosis, if present. Interobserver agreements were estimated with the Cohen kappa coefficient. Calculations of sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were used for intertechnique observations.

RESULTS

For CO(2) venography, global interobserver agreement was good, with a kappa value of 0.90 (range, 0.71-1.00; 95% confidence interval: 0.84, 0.95). A kappa value of 0.96 (range, 0.86-1.00; 95% confidence interval: 0.93, 0.99) was calculated for global interobserver agreement for conventional venography. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of CO(2) venography for all vein segments were 97%, 85%, and 95%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

CO(2) venography had a sensitivity of 97% and a specificity of 85% in the assessment of upper-limb and central vein patency and stenosis, with conventional venography used as the reference standard.

Estudo angiográfico de fístula arteriovenosa utilizando gás carbônico como meio de contrante

OBJETIVO: Este estudo tem por finalidade obter um método diagnóstico angiográfico alternativo que possa ser utilizado em doentes com alto risco ao uso de meio de contraste iodado. MATERIAIS E MÉTODOS: Foram estudados 26 doentes com insuficiência renal crônica, que tiveram suas fístulas analisadas, submetidos à angiografia digital - na primeira fase, utilizando o meio de contraste iodado e, na segunda fase, gás carbônico como meio de contraste, com registro em filme angiográfico. A angiografia foi avaliada por dois médicos independentes, que analisaram a opacificação, o diagnóstico radiológico e o calibre dos vasos; a análise comparativa das medidas da artéria, da veia e da freqüência respiratória antes e após a injeção de contraste foi realizada pelo autor. RESULTADOS: Os resultados obtidos pela analise estatística utilizando coeficiente kappa apresentaram concordância entre os dois médicos, referente à opacificação, de 0,3217, referente ao diagnóstico radiológico, de 0,5583, e referente à analise de calibre dos vasos, de 0,4298. A análise das medidas da artéria e da veia não apresentou diferença significativa pela medida de posição e dispersão, mostrando concordância na regressão linear, com p-valor de 0,3657 e de 0,2041; para a freqüência respiratória, as análises das medidas de posição e dispersão não apresentaram diferença significativa. CONCLUSÃO: Concluímos ser este método uma alternativa no estudo angiográfico em pacientes com antecedente alérgico ou com risco nefrotóxico.

Accuracy of CO2 angiography in vessel diameter assessment: a comparative study of CO2 versus iodinated contrast material in an aortoiliac flow model

PURPOSE

Precise vessel sizing prior to endovascular intervention is critical to achievement of technical success. Diameter measurements obtained with CO2 and iodinated contrast material in an aortoiliac flow model were compared.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Aortoiliac flow was simulated in a compliant, silicone elastomer phantom of the aortoiliac system using an autoperfusion pump (flow volume, approximately 1100 mL/min; mean arterial pressure, 70-80 mm Hg at 80-90 cycles/minute) and a glycerol solution (40% by weight; viscosity 3.7 centipoise at 20 degrees C). Digital subtraction angiography was performed with the phantom in the anteroposterior (AP) plane and in three oblique planes with both CO2 and iodinated contrast material. Five sets of images for both CO2 and iodinated contrast material were obtained for each projection. Two readers independently performed vessel diameter measurements at seven sites (distal abdominal aorta, bilateral proximal and distal common iliac, and mid-external iliac arteries). The model was then evaluated with intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) using a 20-MHz imaging catheter. Actual diameter measurements were taken from the inner wall to inner wall in orthogonal planes at the same locations within the model, as described previously. Analysis was performed to determine local difference in measurements (t tests), difference when compared to the standard AP projection with iodinated contrast material (Dunnett's test) and inter-reader variability (Pitman's test).

RESULTS

The contralateral iliac vessel segment did not opacify when imaging with CO2 in the 45 degrees obliquities; thus, 22 of 28 sites were available for comparison. At 18 of 22 (81.8%) sites, there was significant difference in vessel measurements (P < .01), with CO2 yielding a significantly larger diameter at 17 of 22 (77.3%) of the sites. The difference in mean diameter ranged from -1.28 to 4.47 mm. With use of the AP iodinated contrast material run as the standard, there were significant differences (P < .05) in vessel diameter at 17 of 22 (77.3%) and four of 21 (19%) sites for CO2 and iodinated contrast material respectively, with CO2 tending toward greater diameter measurements. Significant differences (P < .05) in variance between the two readers were present but occurred primarily with CO2 in the AP projection and iodinated contrast material in the 45 degrees left obliquity. With use of IVUS as the standard, there were significant differences (P < .05) in the measured vessel diameters with CO2 at nine of 22 (40.9%) of the sites and with iodinated contrast material at 17 of 28 (60.7%) of the sites. Of the measurements made with CO2, seven of nine (77.8%) of the measurements were of larger diameter than those obtained with IVUS. By contrast, of the measurements made with iodinated contrast material angiography, IVUS measured larger diameters in 16 of 17 (94.1%).

CONCLUSION

CO2 angiography consistently yielded significantly larger vessel measurements when compared to both iodinated contrast angiography and WVUS. These results have important implications in regards to planning intervention based solely on CO2 angiography. Further evaluation is needed before recommending CO2 for vessel sizing in clinical practice.

Digital subtraction angiography of the abdominal aorta and lower extremities: carbon dioxide versus iodinated contrast material

PURPOSE

To compare the diagnostic value of carbon dioxide to that of iodinated contrast material for digital subtraction angiography of the abdominal aorta and lower extremities.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty-five patients underwent comparative CO2 and iodinated contrast material arteriography of the abdominal aorta and lower extremities. For each contrast study, three independent observers evaluated the degree of opacification and percentage of stenosis of each vessel, the degree of certainty of their observations, and the overall quality of the study. Data of CO2 and iodinated studies were compared using analysis of variance for repeated measures. Interobserver and intertechnique agreements were estimated with Cohen's kappa and intraclass correlation coefficient.

RESULTS

Iodine-based vascular opacification was superior to that with CO2 in the central and distal arteries (P = .02). The degree of certainty and overall quality score were higher for iodine than for CO2-based contrast studies (P = .00001). The interobserver agreement for categorizing stenoses was higher for iodine as compared to CO2-based angiography. No significant difference was observed between the mean stenosis values obtained with CO2 and iodine-based angiography in any segment. Intraclass correlation coefficient demonstrated a high degree of convergence of the two techniques for assessing the percentage of stenosis.

CONCLUSION

CO2 can be used as an alternative to iodinated contrast material for obtaining arteriograms of the abdominal aorta and lower extremities for investigating atherosclerotic disease.