A comparison of hospital-based charges following partial and radical nephrectomy

Effect of median household income on surgical approach and survival in renal cell carcinoma

PURPOSE

We sought to determine whether median household income (MHI) independently predicts surgical approach (partial vs. radical nephrectomy) and survival in patients with renal cell carcinoma.

METHODS

The U.S. Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results Database (1988-2011) was queried to examine kidney cancer cases and linked to the Area Health Resources File. We correlated surgical approach and survival, both overall and cancer-specific, with tumor stage, age, race, sex, and income data.

RESULTS

Of 152,589 patients diagnosed with renal cell carcinoma, 24,221 (16%) patients underwent partial nephrectomy, 102,771 (67%) patients underwent radical nephrectomy, and 25,597 (17%) patients had no surgery. There was no significant difference in stage of presentation between the wealthiest and poorest MHI quartiles, with approximately 35% of patients in each quartile presenting with T1aN0M0 disease and 17% of patients presenting with metastatic disease. Despite this, 18% of patients in the wealthiest quartile underwent partial nephrectomy compared to 14% of patients in the poorest quartile. Although the percentage of patients undergoing partial nephrectomy rose over the timeframe studied in both the wealthiest and poorest quartiles, the rate of rise was highest in the wealthier group. Those in the poorest quartile were 0.10 times more likely to die of all causes (95% CI: 1.09-1.11, P<0.001) and 0.09 times more likely to die of kidney cancer (95% CI: 1.05-1.10, P<0.001) than those in the wealthiest quartile over the timeframe studied.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite presenting with similar stage, patients with lower MHI less commonly undergo partial nephrectomy and are more likely to die of kidney cancer than those in the highest MHIs.

Partial nephrectomy versus radical nephrectomy for clinical localised renal masses

BACKGROUND

Partial nephrectomy and radical nephrectomy are the relevant surgical therapy options for localised renal cell carcinoma. However, debate regarding the effects of these surgical approaches continues and it is important to identify and summarise high-quality studies to make surgical treatment recommendations.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of partial nephrectomy compared with radical nephrectomy for clinically localised renal cell carcinoma.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, BIOSIS, LILACS, Scopus, two trial registries and abstracts from three major conferences to 24 February 2017, together with reference lists; and contacted selected experts in the field.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included a randomised controlled trial comparing partial and radical nephrectomy for participants with small renal masses.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

One review author screened all of the titles and abstracts; only citations that were clearly irrelevant were excluded at this stage. Next, two review authors independently assessed full-text reports, identified relevant studies, evaluated the eligibility of the studies for inclusion, assessed trial quality and extracted data. The update of the literature search was performed by two independent review authors. We used Review Manager 5 for data synthesis and data analyses.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified one randomised controlled trial including 541 participants that compared partial nephrectomy to radical nephrectomy. The median follow-up was 9.3 years.Based on low quality evidence, we found that time-to-death of any cause was decreased using partial nephrectomy (HR 1.50, 95% CI 1.03 to 2.18). This corresponds to 79 more deaths (5 more to 173 more) per 1000. Also based on low quality evidence, we found no difference in serious adverse events (RR 2.04, 95% CI 0.19 to 22.34). Findings are consistent with 4 more surgery-related deaths (3 fewer to 78 more) per 1000.Based on low quality evidence, we found no difference in time-to-recurrence (HR 1.37, 95% CI 0.58 to 3.24). This corresponds to 12 more recurrences (14 fewer to 70 more) per 1000. Due to the nature of reporting, we were unable to analyse overall rates for immediate and long-term adverse events. We found no evidence on haemodialysis or quality of life.Reasons for downgrading related to study limitations (lack of blinding, cross-over), imprecision and indirectness (a substantial proportion of patients were ultimately found not to have a malignant tumour). Based on the finding of a single trial, we were unable to conduct any subgroup or sensitivity analyses.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Partial nephrectomy may be associated with a decreased time-to-death of any cause. With regards to surgery-related mortality, cancer-specific survival and time-to-recurrence, partial nephrectomy appears to result in little to no difference.

Is there a financial disincentive to perform partial nephrectomy?

PURPOSE

Despite the explicit endorsement of the American Urological Association guidelines of partial nephrectomy as the treatment of choice for T1a renal cell carcinoma, a considerable underuse of nephron sparing surgery characterizes general practice patterns in the United States. We explored possible financial disincentives associated with partial nephrectomy that may contribute to this important quality of care deficit.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A PubMed® query on perioperative outcomes identified 10 series on open or laparoscopic radical nephrectomy and 16 on open, laparoscopic or robot-assisted partial nephrectomy. Mean operative time and hospital length of stay were calculated for each group. Using these data in conjunction with Health Care Financing Administration data on physician work time, which guides the current Resource-Based Relative Value Scale Medicare fee schedule, we calculated global physician time expenditure and hourly Medicare reimbursement rates for each of these 5 surgical services.

RESULTS

Mean±SD operative time for open and laparoscopic radical nephrectomy, and open, laparoscopic and robot-assisted partial nephrectomy was 180.7±24.7 minutes (95% CI 119.3-242.0) in 3 studies, 178.8±16.5 (95% CI 163.5-194.1) in 7, 226.0±36.9 (95% CI 187.2-264.8) in 6, 227.9±40.2 (95% CI 185.8-270.1) in 6 and 227.9±37.8 (95% CI 167.7-288.1) in 4, respectively (p=0.028). Mean length of stay (days) after open and laparoscopic radical nephrectomy, and open, laparoscopic and robot-assisted partial nephrectomy was 5.8±0.7 days (95% CI 4.0-7.7) in 3 studies, 2.5±1.1 (95% CI 1.4-3.6) in 6, 5.8±0.4 (95% CI 5.3-6.2) in 5, 2.9±0.3 (95% CI 2.6-3.3) in 6 and 2.8±1.0 (95% CI 1.2-4.4) in 4, respectively (p<0.001). The hourly reimbursement rate was calculated at $200.61, $242.03, $185.66, $231.27 and $231.97 for open and laparoscopic radical nephrectomy, and open, laparoscopic and robot-assisted partial nephrectomy, respectively. Hence, open partial nephrectomy emerged as the lowest paying of these procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

Inferior compensation for open partial nephrectomy relative to that of laparoscopic or open radical nephrectomy may impede the dissemination of nephron sparing surgery for small renal masses. This may occur particularly in a general practice setting, where the expertise required for laparoscopic or robot-assisted partial nephrectomy may be lacking. We propose rectifying this inequity to facilitate wider use of nephron sparing surgery in the clinically appropriate setting.

The role of socioeconomic status in renal cell carcinoma

Gender, race, income level, and socioeconomic status (SES) are factors in the decision to diagnose and treat patients with localized and advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). These variables affect both health care delivery at the provider level as well as health care receipt and decision-making at the patient level. The purpose of this article is to review current literature regarding the role of socioeconomic status and patient demographics on the risk of developing, diagnosing, and treating RCC. The article will also address RCC-related treatment costs and reimbursements.

Partial versus radical nephrectomy for 4 to 7 cm renal cortical tumors

PURPOSE

Recent observations suggest that partial nephrectomy for small renal tumors may be associated with improved survival compared with radical nephrectomy. We evaluated survival in patients with 4 to 7 cm renal tumors in a bi-institutional collaboration.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

By combining institutional databases from Mayo Clinic and Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center we identified 1,159 patients with 4.1 to 7.0 cm sporadic, unilateral, solitary, localized renal masses who underwent radical or partial nephrectomy between 1989 and 2006. Patient outcome was compared using Cox proportional hazards regression models.

RESULTS

Of the 1,159 patients 873 (75%) and 286 (25%) were treated with radical and partial nephrectomy, respectively. Patients treated with partial vs radical nephrectomy were significantly more likely to have a solitary kidney (10% vs 0.2%) and chronic kidney disease (15% vs 7%, each p <0.001). Median followup in survivors was 4.8 years (range 0 to 19). There was no significant difference in overall survival in patients treated with radical vs partial nephrectomy (p = 0.8). Of 943 patients with renal cell carcinoma those treated with radical nephrectomy were significantly more likely to die of renal cell carcinoma than those treated with partial nephrectomy (HR 2.16, 95% CI 1.04-4.50, p = 0.039) but this only approached statistical significance on multivariate analysis (HR 1.97, 95% CI 0.92-4.20, p = 0.079).

CONCLUSIONS

Results suggest that overall and cancer specific survival is not compromised when partial nephrectomy is done for 4 to 7 cm renal cortical tumors. With the benefit of preserving renal function our results support partial nephrectomy when technically feasible for renal tumors up to 7 cm.

Contemporary use of partial nephrectomy at a tertiary care center in the United States

PURPOSE

The use of partial nephrectomy for renal cortical tumors appears unacceptably low in the United States according to population based data. We examined the use of partial nephrectomy at our tertiary care facility in the contemporary era.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Using our prospectively maintained nephrectomy database we identified 1,533 patients who were treated for a sporadic and localized renal cortical tumor between 2000 and 2007. Patients with bilateral disease or solitary kidneys were excluded from study and elective operation required an estimated glomerular filtration rate of 45 ml per minute per 1.73 m(2) or greater. Predictors of partial nephrectomy were evaluated using logistic regression models.

RESULTS

Overall 854 (56%) and 679 patients (44%) were treated with partial and radical nephrectomy, respectively. In the 820 patients treated electively for a tumor 4 cm or less the frequency of partial nephrectomy steadily increased from 69% in 2000 to 89% in 2007. In the 365 patients treated electively for a 4 to 7 cm tumor the frequency of partial nephrectomy also steadily increased from 20% in 2000 to 60% in 2007. On multivariate analysis male gender (p = 0.025), later surgery year (p <0.001), younger patient age (p = 0.005), smaller tumor (p <0.001) and open surgery (p <0.001) were significant predictors of partial nephrectomy. American Society of Anesthesiologists score, race and body mass index were not significantly associated with treatment type.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of partial nephrectomy is increasing and it is now performed in approximately 90% of patients with T1a tumors at our institution. For reasons that remain unclear certain groups of patients are less likely to be treated with partial nephrectomy.

Laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomy: cost comparison with analysis of individual parameters

INTRODUCTION

Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) is less morbid than open partial nephrectomy (OPN), but the high cost of new technologies used in LPN may make this a significantly more expensive procedure. In this study, the overall costs of OPN and LPN were compared using data extracted from the literature, and a series of sensitivity analyses were performed to determine the impact of individual cost components on overall cost.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data on operating room (OR) time, equipment use, and length of stay (LOS) were abstracted after a comprehensive literature review of LPN and OPN. Decision tree models were devised to estimate the cost of each treatment using the DATA program (TreeAge software 3.5). LPN model assumptions included one that used all reusable equipment, all disposable equipment, and a hand-assist model. One and two-way sensitivity analyses were performed to evaluate the effect of individual treatment variables on overall cost.

RESULTS

The literature yielded 12 OPN and 13 LPN articles, comprising a total of 574 and 949 patients, respectively. The weighted mean LOS were 5.7 and 2.9 days (<0.001); average tumor sizes were 3.2 cm and 2.5 cm (P = 0.016); and the weighted mean OR times were 184 and 187 minutes for OPN and LPN (P = 0.7), respectively. The LPN model using all disposable equipment is less costly than OPN by $431 ($8450 v $8019). The slight cost superiority of the laparoscopic approach was driven by shorter LOS. One-way sensitivity analyses showed that LPN is less costly if the OR time of LPN is less than 146 minutes; LOS after LPN is less than 4.6 days; or LPN OR supply costs are less than $1670. Two-way sensitivity analyses demonstrated the effects of modifying OR time, LOS, and surgical equipment on the cost-equivalence of LPN and OPN.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy can be cost equivalent to the open approach in managing small renal masses if the OR time, LOS, and equipment costs are closely monitored. The high cost of new technologies can be offset by shorter LOS and decrease in OR time.

Radical nephrectomy for pT1a renal masses may be associated with decreased overall survival compared with partial nephrectomy

PURPOSE

We reviewed our surgical experience with small renal tumors, comparing overall survival in patients treated with radical and partial nephrectomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Using our nephrectomy registry we identified patients with sporadic, unilateral, solitary and localized renal masses 4 cm or less who underwent radical or partial nephrectomy between 1989 and 2003. Patients with a solitary kidney or impaired renal function at presentation were excluded, leaving 648 available for analysis. Overall survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and associations with death were evaluated using Cox proportional hazards regression.

RESULTS

At last followup 146 patients had died of any cause and 502 were alive at a median of 7.1 years. Radical and partial nephrectomy was performed in 290 and 358 patients, respectively. In all patients radical nephrectomy was not significantly associated with death from any cause compared with partial nephrectomy (RR 1.12, p = 0.52). However, there was a significant interaction with age, leading us to stratify our analysis at the median age of 65 years. In 327 patients younger than 65 years radical nephrectomy was significantly associated with death from any cause compared with partial nephrectomy (RR 2.16, p = 0.02). The increased risk of death persisted after adjusting for year of surgery (p = 0.02), preoperative creatinine (p = 0.03), Charlson-Romano index (p = 0.04), symptoms at presentation (p = 0.02), diabetes at presentation (p = 0.03) and histology (p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that, compared with partial nephrectomy, radical nephrectomy is associated with decreased overall survival in younger patients with small renal masses.

Comparison between open partial and radical nephrectomy for renal tumours: perioperative outcome and health-related quality of life

OBJECTIVE

To compare perioperative outcome and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) after open partial and radical nephrectomy for renal tumours.

METHODS

Literature search of Medline and additional references from non-Medline-indexed journals for documents concerning treatment of renal tumours, perioperative outcome, and HRQOL after radical and partial nephrectomy.

RESULTS

A total of 39 references were used of which 7 discussed complications, 3 included hospital costs and length of stay, and 7 each discussed renal function and QOL. No statistical difference was found concerning perioperative complications although there seems to be a trend towards a slightly higher complication rate after partial nephrectomy. No statistical difference was reported between the two procedures concerning hospital costs and length of stay. For postoperative renal function, a higher incidence of chronic renal failure was noted after radical nephrectomy. When considering the HRQOL a benefit was found after elective partial nephrectomy. In case of mandatory partial nephrectomy the fear of recurrence and the worry about having fewer than two normal kidneys were significantly higher.

CONCLUSIONS

Partial nephrectomy achieves a better HRQOL due to better preservation of renal function and overall quality of life. Considering perioperative outcome no statistical difference was found for hospital costs and length of stay. A trend towards a higher perioperative complication rate was found after partial nephrectomy.

Utility of frozen section analysis of resection margins during partial nephrectomy

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the utility of routine intraoperative frozen-section histologic analysis during partial nephrectomy to ensure negative surgical margins. Partial nephrectomy has gained acceptance for surgical treatment of small renal cancers. Many surgeons send specimens for intraoperative frozen section histologic analysis to ensure negative margins.

METHODS

We reviewed the records of 78 patients who underwent partial nephrectomy for presumed malignancy. Patient demographics, intraoperative findings, and pathologic and clinical outcomes were analyzed.

RESULTS

Seventy-nine partial nephrectomies were performed in 78 patients. Frozen sections were obtained intraoperatively in 76 cases. In 1 case (1.3%), a single margin was interpreted as positive for carcinoma, prompting deeper resection. The final histopathologic finding was interpreted as angiomyolipoma rather than carcinoma. The final pathologic examination revealed renal cell carcinoma in 52 (66%) of 79 cases. The mean oncologic follow-up was 16.2 months. One local recurrence was noted (1.9%). It arose in the resection bed 19 months after removal of a 4.5-cm tumor (pathologic Stage T3a). Both intraoperative frozen section margins and final pathologic margins were negative in this case. One patient developed pulmonary metastases and represented the only metastatic recurrence, as well as the only cancer-related death in our cohort (1.9%).

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that when partial nephrectomy is performed with attention to excising a perimeter of grossly normal-appearing parenchyma, sending specimens for intraoperative frozen section analyses may provide an unnecessary expense without providing meaningful, reliable information. Additional studies, including larger cohorts and extended follow-up, are needed to support these results.