Evolution of retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy (RPLND) in the management of non-seminomatous testicular cancer (NSGCT)

Mobilize the Troops! Military Involvement in the History of Testicular Cancer

This review examines the historical evolution of testicular cancer (TCa) treatment, emphasizing the transformative impact of World War II. Prior to the war, cases of more than 50 testicular tumors were exceedingly rare. The mobilization of American troops, especially after the German Blitz, resulted in widespread military health screenings, leading to a surge in incidental TCa diagnoses during the 1940s. This pivotal moment triggered rapid advancements in TCa pathology classification, surgical techniques, tumor marker utilization, and breakthroughs in radiation and chemotherapy. Military-driven research and practices fundamentally reshaped TCa treatment, significantly improving patient outcomes and setting new standards in this disease.

Short and long-term outcomes of arterial and caval replacement during postchemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node dissection in metastatic testicular cancer

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

For patients with metastatic testicular cancer undergoing retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND), the burden of metastatic disease can require consideration for resection and replacement of major vessels despite chemotherapy. We aimed to clarify the outcomes for patients undergoing these major vascular procedures in a modern era.

METHODS

Between 2000 and 2020, 2,054 patients with metastatic testicular cancer underwent a PC-RPLND; of those men, 41 also underwent an aortic, iliac, and/or inferior vena cava (IVC) resection. For men who required a vascular resection, clinicopathologic and operative details were collected. Kaplan-Meier curves were generated to estimate overall survival.

RESULTS

The median preoperative mass size was 9cm in the retroperitoneum. Viable malignancy or teratoma was present in 85% of resected specimens. Following PC-RPLND and vascular resection, 22 (54%) patients recurred. The median (IQR) time to relapse was 4.6 (2.5-8.0) months. 18 (44%) patients died of disease. The overall complication rate was 56%. Ten (24%) patients had Clavien-Dindo III/IV complications, with 2 postoperative mortalities. The median overall survival was 14.9 months. Among the 41 patients, 18 patients had re-operative PC-RPLND and vascular resection; the re-operative PC-RPLND patients had significantly worse survival compared to initial attempt at PC-RPLND (9.3 vs. 162 months, P = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

The overall survival rate for patients undergoing PC-RPLND with resection of the aorta, IVC, and/or iliac artery is 45% at 2 years. For patients with limited treatment options, these complex surgeries may offer survival benefit with an acceptable morbidity profile.

Propensity-matched Analysis of Open Versus Robotic Primary Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection for Clinical Stage II Testicular Cancer

BACKGROUND

Open retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (O-RPLND) is the accepted standard surgical approach to treat retroperitoneal nodal disease in testis cancer. Increasingly, robotic RPLND (R-RPLND) is being performed due to the potential for lower blood loss, shorter length of stay, and accelerated recovery.

OBJECTIVE

We have performed a propensity score matching (PSM) analysis comparing the survival and perioperative outcomes of O- and R-RPLND.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

Analyzing the data from all patients who underwent primary RPLND at our center between 1990 and 2022, we used PSM to create a 2:1 (O-RPLND:R-RPLND) matched cohort.

INTERVENTION

Primary O-RPLND versus R-RPLND.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

The primary endpoint was time to relapse. The secondary endpoints included operating time, length of stay, estimated blood loss (EBL), and surgical complications. Relapse-free survival rates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and log-rank tests were used to compare perioperative outcomes of O-RPLND versus R-RPLND.

KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS

A total of 178 patients underwent primary RPLND: 137 O-RPLND and 41 R-RPLND. After PSM, 26 patients in the R-RPLND group were matched with 38 in the O-RPLND group. After matching, no significant baseline differences were noted. After a median follow-up of 23.5 mo (interquartile range 4.4-59.2), one (3.8%) relapse was noted in the R-RPLND group versus three (7.8%) in the O-RPLND group; however, this was not significant (hazard ratio 0.65, 95% confidence interval 0.07-6.31, p = 0.7097). No in-field relapses occurred in either cohort. R-RPLND was associated with a shorter length of stay (1 vs 5 d, p < 0.0001) and lower EBL (200 vs 300 ml, p = 0.032), but longer operative time (8.8 vs 4.3 h, p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

R-RPLND offers low morbidity and improved perioperative outcomes, while maintaining oncologic efficacy of the open approach.

PATIENT SUMMARY

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to compare open and robotic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (R-RPLND) using a propensity score-matched system. We encourage the discussion and inclusion of primary R-RPLND into the standard of care algorithm for patients with de novo clinical stage (CS) II and relapsed CS I with CS II equivalent disease.

Robotic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for paratesticular rhabdomyosarcoma in adolescents: a case series

Robotic assisted (RA) retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) has grown in popularity as it offers decreased morbidity and faster recovery compared to the open technique. Proponents of open surgery raised concerns about the oncological fidelity of the RA approach for testicular tumors where complete resection is needed. In boys > 10 years with paratesticular rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS), RPLND is indicated for staging purposes only. In this population, the RA technique should provide its benefits without concerns for oncological compromise. We present an analysis of RA-RPLND for boys with paratesticular RMS. We queried our institution's prospectively collected database of pediatric robotic cases for patients undergoing RA-RPLND post-radical orchiectomy for paratesticular mass, confirmed by pathology as RMS. Demographic, surgical, follow-up, and oncological outcomes were evaluated between 2017 and 2023. Five patients underwent RA-RPLND for paratesticular RMS. The median age was 16.1 years (15-17), with median OR time of 456 min (357-508). No conversions to open occurred. Inpatient median total opioid use was 1.8 (0.4-2.7) morphine equivalent/kg. The median lymph node yield was 27 (8-44) and post-op length of stay was 3 days (2-5). The median time to initiating adjuvant chemotherapy was 10.5 days (7-13). One patient had complications: pneumothorax attributed to central line placement and chyle leak that resolved in 1 week with dietary restriction. Our series demonstrates the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of the RA approach for RPLND in pediatric patients with paratesticular RMS. This is the most extensive case series currently in the literature and the only one exclusively done for paratesticular RMS.

Metachronous bilateral testicular germ cell tumors with different histopathology: A case report

Background

Testicular cancer is the most common solid tumor affecting men aged 20-39 years old. About 95% of all testicular tumor is testicular germ cell tumor. Bilateral testicular tumor is a rare incident and has similar histopathology only in less than 5% of all testicular cancer patients. Besides oncological issues, bilateral testicular tumors could lead to further consequences, such as psychosocial and hormonal issues. This article shows a case of different histopathology in the metachronous bilateral testicular tumors.

Case presentation

A 34-years-old male came with right radical orchiectomy due to testicular pure seminoma pT1N0M0S0 three and half years ago. He underwent bleomycin, etoposide phosphate (BEP) chemotherapy for progressive multiple lymphadenopathies in paracaval and interaortacaval region from positron emission tomography (PET)/computerized tomography (CT) scan a year later. Sperm banking was done before initiated chemotherapy. High metabolic activity was detected in contralateral testis from follow up PET-scan. Left testicle enlargement with hard consistency was found on physical examination and there is an elevation of alpha-feto protein (AFP) and β-hCG. Intraoperatively, the frozen section identified a malignant tumor and the patient was decided to undergo radical left orchiectomy. Postoperative pathological results showed a mixed germ cell tumor of 3.5 × 2.5 × 2 cm consisting of immature teratoma, yolk sac tumor and embryonic carcinoma without lympho-vascular invasion and involvement of the spermatic cord. Post-operative imaging and testicular tumor marker did not identify any metastases. BEP chemotherapy, testosterone replacement therapy was planned for further management in this patient with complete blood count, prostate serum antigen (PSA) and digital rectal examination should be measured three to six weeks after initiation.

Conclusion

Metachronous bilateral TGCT with different histopathology is a rare disease. The treatment depends on histology of second tumor and its stage. TRT is mandatory for patient undergoing bilateral orchidectomy to address lack if testosterone.

Update on pediatric testicular germ cell tumors

BACKGROUND

Testicular germ cell tumors are uncommon tumors that are encountered by pediatric surgeons and urologists and require a knowledge of appropriate contemporary evaluation and surgical and medical management.

METHOD

A review of the recommended diagnostic evaluation and current surgical and medical management of children and adolescents with testicular germ cell tumors based upon recently completed clinical trials was performed and summarized in this article.

RESULTS

In this summary of childhood and adolescent testicular germ cell tumors, we review the initial clinical evaluation, surgical and medical management, risk stratification, results from recent prospective cooperative group studies, and clinical outcomes. A summary of recently completed clinical trials by pediatric oncology cooperative groups is provided, and best surgical practices are discussed.

CONCLUSIONS

Testicular germ cell tumors in children are rare tumors. International collaborations, data-sharing, and enrollment of patients at all stages and risk classifications into active clinical trials will enhance our knowledge of these rare tumors and most importantly improve outcomes of patients with testicular germ cell tumors.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

This is a review article of previously published and referenced level 1 and 2 studies, but also includes expert opinion level 5, represented by the American Pediatric Surgical Association Cancer Committee.

Associations of serum levels of microRNA-371a-3p (M371) with risk factors for progression in nonseminomatous testicular germ cell tumours clinical stage 1

Purpose

Lymphovascular invasion (LV1) and presence of > 50% embryonal carcinoma (> 50% EC) represent risk factors for progression in patients with clinical stage 1 (CS1) nonseminomatous (NS) testicular germ cell tumours. As serum levels of microRNA-371a-3p (M371) are capable of detecting small amounts of GCT, we evaluated if LV1 and > 50% EC are associated with M371 levels.

Methods

M371 serum levels were measured postoperatively in 153 NS CS1 patients and both pre- and postoperatively in 131 patients. We registered the following factors: age, tumour size, LV status, > 50% EC, teratoma in primary, preoperative elevation of classical tumour markers. M371 expression was compared among subgroups. The ability of M371 to predict LV1 was calculated by receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves. Multiple regression analysis was used to look for associations of M371 levels with other factors.

Results

Postoperatively elevated M371 levels were found in 29.4% of the patients, but were neither associated with LV status nor with > 50% EC. Likewise, relative decrease of M371 was not associated. ROC analysis of postoperative M371 levels revealed an AUC of 0.5 for the ability to predict LV1 while preoperative M371 had an AUC of 0.732. Multiple regression analysis revealed significant associations of preoperative M371 levels with LV status (p = 0.003), tumour size (p = 0.001), > 50% EC (p = 0.004), and teratoma component (p = 0.045).

Conclusion

Postoperatively elevated M371 levels are not associated with risk factors for progression in NS CS1 patients. However, the significant association of preoperative M371 expression with LV1 deserves further evaluation.

Major complications of post-chemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node dissection in a contemporary cohort of patients with testicular cancer and a review of the literature

Background

Post-chemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (pc-RPLND) is one cornerstone in the clinical management of patients with nonseminomatous testicular germ cell tumours (GCT). A wide range of complication rates in this type of surgery is reported so far. We retrospectively evaluated the frequency of major complications by using the Clavien-Dindo classification and analysed the influence of various clinical factors on complication rates in pc-RPLND.

Methods

We retrospectively analysed 146 GCT patients undergoing pc-RPLND. Complications of grade III–V according to the Clavien-Dindo classification occurring within 30 days after surgery were registered along with the following clinical factors: age, body mass index (BMI), duration of surgery, number of anatomic fields resected, side of primary tumour, histology of surgical specimen, histology of primary tumour, and total dose of cisplatin applied prior to surgery. For comparison, we also evaluated 35 chemotherapy-naïve patients with primary RPLND and 19 with laparoscopic RPLND. We analysed types and frequencies of the various complications as well as associations with clinical factors using descriptive statistical methods.

Results

A total of 14.4% grade III–IV complications were observed in pc-RPLND, and 8.6% and 5.3% in primary and in laparoscopic RPLND, respectively. There was no perioperative mortality. Lymphocele was the most frequent adverse event (16% of grade III–IV complications). Operation time > 270 min (p = 0.001) and vital cancer in the resected specimen (p = 0.02) were significantly associated with higher complication rates. Left-sided resection fields involved two-fold higher complication rates, barely missing statistical significance (p = 0.06).

Conclusions

Pc-RPLND involves a grade III–V complication rate of 14.4%. Prolonged operation time and vital cancer in the residual mass are significantly associated with higher complication rates. The Clavien-Dindo classification system may allow inter-observer variation in rating complication grades, which may represent one reason for the wide range of reported RPLND complication rates. RPLND represents major surgery and surgeons active in this field must be competent to manage adverse events.

Population-based analysis of cost and peri-operative outcomes between open and robotic primary retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for germ cell tumors

PURPOSE

To compare perioperative outcomes and perform the first cost analysis between open retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (O-RPLND) and Robotic-RPLND (R-RPLND) using a national all-payer inpatient care database.

METHODS

Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) was queried between 2013-2016 for primary RPLND and germ cell tumor. We compared cost, length of stay (LOS), and complications between O-RPLND and R-RPLND. Linear regression plots identified point of cost equivalence between R-RPLND and O-RPLND. A multivariable linear regression model was generated to analyze predictors of cost.

RESULTS

44 cases of R-RPLND and 319 cases of O-RPLND were identified. R-RPLND was associated with lower rate of complications (0% vs. 16.6%, p < 0.01) and shorter LOS [Median (IQR): 1.5 (1-3) days vs. 4 (3-6) days, p < 0.01]. Rates of ileus, genitourinary complications, and transfusions were lower with R-RPLND, but did not reach significance. On multivariable analysis, robotic approach independently contributed $4457, while each day of hospitalization contributed to an additional $2,431 to the overall model of cost. Linear regression plots determined point of cost equivalence between an R-RPLND staying a mean of 2 days was 4-5 days for O-RPLND, supporting the multivariable analysis. Total hospitalization cost was equivalent between R-RPLND and O-RPLND [Median (IQR): $15,681($12,735-$21,596) vs $16,718($11,799-$24,403), p = 0.48]-suggesting that the cost equivalency of R-RPLND is, at least in part, attributable to shorter LOS.

CONCLUSION

While O-RPLND remains the gold standard and this study is limited by selection bias of a robotic approach to RPLND, our findings suggest primary R-RPLND may represent a cost-equivalent option with decreased hospital LOS in select cases.

Is there still a place for retroperitoneal lymph node dissection in clinical stage 1 nonseminomatous testicular germ-cell tumours? A retrospective clinical study

Background

Primary retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) ultimately lost its role as the standard management of clinical stage (CS) 1 nonseminomatous (NS) testicular germ cell tumours (GCTs) in Europe when the European Germ Cell Cancer Consensus Group released their recommendations in 2008. Current guide-lines recommend surgery only for selected patients but reasons for selection remain rather ill-defined. We evaluated the practice patterns of the management of CS1 patients and looked specifically to the role of RPLND among other standard treatment options.

Methods

We retrospectively evaluated the treatment modalities of 75 consecutive patients treated for CS1 NS at one centre during 2008–2017. The patients undergoing RPLND were selected for a closer review. Particular reasons for surgery, clinical features of patients, and therapeutic outcome were analyzed using descriptive statistical methods.

Results

Twelve patients (16%) underwent nerve-sparing RPLND, nine surveillance, 54 had various regimens of adjuvant chemotherapy. Particular reasons for surgery involved illnesses precluding chemotherapy (n = 2), patients´ choice (n = 4), and teratomatous histology of the primary associated with equivocal radiologic findings (n = 6). Five patients had lymph node metastases, two received additional chemotherapy. Antegrade ejaculation was preserved in all cases. One patient had a grade 2 complication that was managed conservatively. All RPLND-patients remained disease-free.

Conclusions

Primary RPLND is a useful option in distinct CS1 patients, notably those with concurrent health problems precluding chemotherapy, and those with high proportions of teratoma in the primary associated with equivocal radiological findings. Informed patient’s preference represents another acceptable reason for the procedure. RPLND properly suits the needs of well-selected patients with CS1 nonseminoma and deserves consideration upon clinical decision-making.

Testicular cancer

Testicular cancer is the most common malignancy among men between 14 and 44 years of age, and its incidence has risen over the past two decades in Western countries. Both genetic and environmental factors contribute to the development of testicular cancer, for which cryptorchidism is the most common risk factor. Progress has been made in our understanding of the disease since the initial description of carcinoma in situ of the testis in 1972 (now referred to as germ cell neoplasia in situ), which has led to improved treatment options. The combination of surgery and cisplatin-based chemotherapy has resulted in a cure rate of >90% in patients with testicular cancer, although some patients become refractory to chemotherapy or have a late relapse; an improved understanding of the molecular determinants underlying tumour sensitivity and resistance may lead to the development of novel therapies for these patients. This Primer provides an overview of the biology, epidemiology, diagnosis and current treatment guidelines for testicular cancer, with a focus on germ cell tumours. We also outline areas for future research and what to expect in the next decade for testicular cancer.

Laparoscopic Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection in the Management of Testis Cancer

BACKGROUND

The surgical approach to management of testis cancer has been traditionally through an open incision, but in the last decade, several centers have reported their experience with laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (LRPLND).

METHODS

We reviewed the English literature, summarized the outcomes, and included our initial experience with the LRPLND procedure.

RESULTS

Improvements in operative time, complications, and morbidity have occurred as surgical experience has increased. The procedure is more challenging in postchemotherapy patients. Outcomes at our institute are comparable to reported series from other institutions, and LRPLND is our current procedure of choice for RPLND.

CONCLUSIONS

LRPLND has been shown to be a safe, effective, minimally invasive procedure in the management of testicular cancer patients who require surgery to address the retroperitoneal lymph nodes.

Post-Chemotherapy Robotic Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection: Institutional Experience

PURPOSE

There is little literature on robotic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RRPLND) in the difficult post-chemotherapy (PC) setting. We report on the outcome of RRPLND in patients with PC-residual masses.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between 2011 and 2015, we performed 12 PC-RRPLND. Mean patient age was 37.8 years. Mean body mass index was 30.78. Nine (75%) patients had nonseminomatus germ cell tumor (NSGCT) and three (25%) patients had seminoma tumors. Cancer stage was III in six (50%), II-C in three (25%), II-B in two (16.7%), and II-A in one (8.03%). International Germ Cell Cancer Collaborative Group (IGCCCG) prognostic classification in the NSGCT was good in six, intermediate in two, and poor in one, and was good in the three seminoma patients.

RESULTS

The procedure was completed effectively in 11 (91.7%) patients. Mean operative time was 312 minutes. The mean estimated blood loss was 475 mL. Mean hospital stay was 3.2 days. Mean number of lymph node excised was 12. Six of the excised masses were ≥5 cm (N3), largest was 7.5 cm. Pathology showed teratoma in five (45.5%), benign/necrosis in five (45.5%), and viable germ cells in one (9%). Major complication (Clavien ≥3) occurred in one patient and minor (Clavien ≤2) in two. Antegrade ejaculation was preserved in eight patients and in one could not be assessed. At a median follow-up of 31 months, no infield or outfield relapses occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

Robotic PC-retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) is technically feasible and with acceptable morbidity. It is associated with low blood loss and short hospital stay. More research is needed to assess the long-term outcome and to compare standard open RPLND.

Risk of Recurrence for Clinical Stage I and II Patients With Teratoma Only at Primary Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the oncologic outcomes of patients with retroperitoneal teratoma only at primary retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) who did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between 1979 and 2010, 23 patients with clinical stage (CS) I and II disease underwent primary RPLND at our institution with teratoma only in the retroperitoneum. No patient received adjuvant chemotherapy and the minimum follow-up was 2 years.

RESULTS

At the initial diagnosis, 13 patients (56.5%) had CS I disease and 10 patients (43.5%) had CS II disease. Pathologic staging demonstrated IIA in 13 patients (56.5%), IIB in 8 patients (34.8%), and IIC in 2 patients (8.7%). The 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) was 100% with a median follow-up of 5.8 years (range, 2.1-25.4). DFS was not significantly different comparing pathologic stage IIA vs IIB/IIC disease (P = .73). Two patients (14%) developed late relapses. One patient had a pelvic recurrence 11 years after primary RPLND. Final pathology from the pelvic resection demonstrated embryonal carcinoma. He remains disease free after his second surgery. The second patient had a contralateral retroperitoneal recurrence with yolk-sac tumor and teratoma 11 years after primary RPLND. He was treated with chemotherapy followed by postchemotherapy RPLND.

CONCLUSION

The relapse rate for patients with teratoma only at primary RPLND is low irrespective of PS. Adjuvant chemotherapy is therefore not recommended in the management of these patients.

Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection as First-Line Treatment of Node-Positive Seminoma

INTRODUCTION

The long-term morbidity associated with treating advanced seminoma can be significant. Retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) has established oncologic efficacy in treating germ cell tumors with minimal long-term toxicity. We describe our experience with RPLND as a front-line treatment of lymph node-positive seminoma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We reviewed our institutional review board-approved testicular cancer database to find the patients with pure seminoma and isolated retroperitoneal lymph node disease who had undergone primary RPLND. The clinical and pathologic variables were obtained. The follow-up data were used to determine recurrence and death.

RESULTS

Four patients with a mean age of 37 years were identified. All patients had normal tumor markers and retroperitoneal lymphadenopathy measuring 1.1, 1.5, 1.8, and 5.5 cm before RPLND. Of the 4 patients, 3 had had seminoma diagnosed at orchiectomy and 1 (with a 5.5-cm retroperitoneal lymphadenopathy and a burned out primary testicular mass) had had seminoma diagnosed at RPLND after 2 nondiagnostic retroperitoneal biopsies. All patients had undergone nerve-sparing, template, extraperitoneal RPLND and were discharged home after 3 days. An average of 3 positive lymph nodes were found. Of the 4 patients, 3 had pathologic stage IIA and 1 stage IIB disease, with no patient undergoing adjuvant therapy. At a mean follow-up period of 25 months, no patient had experienced disease recurrence, and none had died. All patients maintained antegrade ejaculation, and no long-term complications had developed.

CONCLUSION

Our small series has demonstrated encouraging oncologic efficacy for RPLND as a primary treatment of retroperitoneal lymph node-positive seminoma. A multi-institutional phase II trial of RPLND for stage IIA seminoma is being developed.

Complications of lymphadenectomy in urologic surgery

Lymphadenectomy in urologic surgery provides accurate staging and may be therapeutic in some patients with lymph node metastases. In addition to the associated cost, pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) has the potential for morbidity. This article focuses on the complications associated with PLND, including lymphocele, thromboembolic events, ureteral injury, nerve injury, vascular injury, and lymphedema. With improvements in surgical technique and perioperative care, the morbidity associated with lymphadenectomy may be minimized.

Sperm banking and the cancer patient

The current concepts, recommendations, and principles of sperm banking as it pertains to the comprehensive care of young men of reproductive age with cancer are reviewed. Obstacles to sperm banking are addressed as well as future directions for fertility-preserving technologies. All cancer therapies-chemotherapy, radiation, and surgery-are potential threats to a man's reproductive potential. In addition, cancer itself can impair spermatogenesis. Thus, sperm cryopreservation prior to initiating life-saving cancer treatment offers men and their families the best chance to father biologically related children and should be offered to all men with cancer before treatment. Better patient and provider education, as well as deliberate, coordinated strategies at comprehensive cancer care centers are necessary to make fertility preservation for male cancer patients a priority during pretreatment planning.

The history and anatomy of urologic lymphadenectomy

The history of urologic lymphadenectomy is rich and diverse. Our current understanding of its use and benefits is a product of the hard work of numerous physicians and scientists from many nations. Standard dissection templates for the various urologic malignancies are based on a complete understanding of the anatomy of the lymphatic system, which has developed immensely since Hippocrates first described the white blood of the lymphatic system while performing an axillary dissection. It is hoped that the next 100 years will bring even greater comprehension of its value and utility.

Retroperitoneal lymph node dissection: reassessment of modified templates

The retroperitoneum is the initial metastatic site in 90% of patients with nonseminomatous germ cell tumours (NSGCTs) of the testis. A retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) provides accurate staging and effective therapy, minimizes the need for adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with low-volume metastases, and optimizes durable cure rates. We review the rationale for and development of RPLND, focusing specifically on the advantages and limitations of the variable surgical templates. Bilateral RPLND has a long-standing record of maximizing cancer control and minimizing secondary therapy. Both modified templates and prospective nerve-sparing techniques were introduced to optimize rates of antegrade ejaculation. Limited resections as advocated by modified templates are appealing in the setting of primary RPLND but can be associated with a 3-23% risk of residual disease. Modified templates have also been advocated for highly selected patients after chemotherapy but, if applied to all patients undergoing surgery after chemotherapy, will lead to an unacceptably high rate of residual disease, even in patients with small masses after chemotherapy. For patients undergoing primary or post-chemotherapy RPLND, a full bilateral template (with nerve-sparing when appropriate) maximizes cure rates while minimizing ejaculatory morbidity and the subsequent need for chemotherapy.

Advances made in the treatment of testicular cancer in the U.S. Military: 1946 to the present

Testicular cancer is presently one of the most curable solid tumors, and thanks to diagnostic, surgical, and medical advances over the last several decades, the treatment of this tumor serves as a paradigm for multimodal treatment of solid malignancies. Due to testicular cancer's predilection for younger patients, many of the seminal improvements and discoveries were made possible as a result of initial investigatory groundwork laid by military physicians treating servicemen. This article reviews historical contributions of the United States Military Medical Departments in the arena of testicular cancer treatment in the post-World War II era.

Open versus laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection: assessing adequacy of dissection in a porcine model

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (L-RPLND) is emerging as a viable alternative to traditional open retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (O-RPLND). Despite numerous reports confirming clinical oncologic equivalency between the two approaches, however, concerns still remain over the adequacy of laparoscopic dissection. We therefore sought to compare the completeness of dissection between O-RPLND and L-RPLND in a porcine model.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fourteen domestic swine were divided into two equivalent groups. Both groups underwent bilateral retroperitoneal lymph node dissection, approximating templates used in human dissection. In one group, the procedure was performed through an open midline incision, while the other group underwent completely laparoscopic dissection. Tissue was independently analyzed by a pathologist, who recorded lymph node yield based on microscopic evaluation.

RESULTS

All animals in the L-RPLND group underwent successful procedures, without the need for conversion. Two open procedures were aborted because of hemorrhage. Mean lymph node yield from O-RPLND was 32, while the mean yield for L-RPLND was 29. This difference was not statistically significant (P=0.65).

CONCLUSIONS

In the porcine model, L-RPLND is capable of providing a quality of dissection equivalent to that of O-RPLND, in terms of absolute lymph node yield on microscopic examination. The applicability of this data to human patients, however, may be limited by significant anatomic differences between the human and the pig. Further prospective comparison in human patients is critically needed.

Recurrence Pattern and Proposed Surveillance Protocol Following Post-Chemotherapy Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection

PURPOSE

We evaluated the recurrence pattern in patients with nonseminomatous germ cell tumors treated with post-chemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node dissection and determined the optimal surveillance strategy in these patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between 1980 and 2003, 236 patients with clinical stage IIA-III nonseminomatous germ cell tumors underwent post-chemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node dissection. Patients with increased preoperative tumor markers (alpha-fetoprotein greater than 15 ng/ml and/or beta-human chorionic gonadotropin greater than 2.2 U/ml) were excluded from study resulting in 198 patients for analysis. We retrospectively reviewed medical records for pertinent clinical and treatment related outcomes. In our patient population recurrence developed in 45 (23%) patients and 22 (11%) died of disease at a median followup of 41 months (range 6 to 250) after retroperitoneal lymph node dissection.

RESULTS

The clinical stage of testis cancer was IIA in 17, IIB in 49, IIC in 83 and III in 49 patients. Of the 45 patients with postoperative recurrence, 16 had concomitant multiple sites of recurrence with a total of 64 sites reported. Of the cases of recurrence 21 (46.7%) were in those of clinical stage III, 18 (40%) stage IIC and 6 (11.8%) stage IIB disease. The most frequent site of recurrence was the chest (32, 49%), followed by the abdomen (14, 22%), supraclavicular lymph nodes (8, 13%), brain (5, 8%) and other sites (5, 8%).

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the recurrence pattern we propose stage specific surveillance guidelines for the followup of patients after post-chemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node dissection. These guidelines help identify patients at high risk for disease progression and, thus, requiring more stringent postoperative followup.

Refining the laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for testicular cancer

Since its initial description, the laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection has evolved considerably, from a purely diagnostic tool performed to stage germ cell testicular cancer to a therapeutic operation that fully duplicates the open technique. Herein, we describe the current technique employed at our institution, along with illustrations of all surgical steps, and delineate the refinements of the technique over time.

Predictors of outcome in patients undergoing postchemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for testicular cancer

BACKGROUND

The management of metastatic nonseminomatous germ cell tumors (NSGCT) frequently consists of systemic chemotherapy followed by retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (PC-RPLND). The aim of the present study was to evaluate the authors' PC-RPLND experience and identify predictors of outcome in these patients.

METHODS

Between 1980 and 2003, 236 patients with clinical Stage IIA-III NSGCT underwent PC-RPLND. Their medical records were retrospectively reviewed for pertinent clinical and treatment-related outcomes. The 5-year disease-specific and recurrence-free survival was 85% and 75%, respectively, with the median length of follow-up after RPLND 45 months (6-250 months).

RESULTS

The median age of patients at diagnosis was 28 years, with all patients receiving systemic chemotherapy (median of 5 cycles) before RPLND. On multivariate analysis, predictors of poorer disease-specific survival (DSS) included systemic symptoms at presentation (P = .05), elevated pre-RPLND serum alpha fetoprotein (AFP, P = .006) and beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG, P = .004), postoperative complications (P = .03), and recurrence (P < .0001). Predictors of poorer recurrence-free survival (RFS) included advanced clinical stage (IIC-III, P = .001) and presence of viable tumor in the RPLND specimen (P = .03). A pre-RPLND serum AFP > 9 ng/mL and HCG > 4.1 mIU/mL were found to predict a worse DSS (P = .03 and .03, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients undergoing PC-RPLND, preoperative tumor markers and the occurrence of postoperative complications or recurrence are predictive of poorer DSS. Advanced clinical stage and viable tumor in the surgical specimen predict worse RFS.

[Lymphadenectomy for testicular cancer. Diagnostic and prognostic significance as well as therapeutic benefit]

The rationale to perform retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) in testicular cancer depends on the clinical stage and previous therapy. Thus, it can be performed either with diagnostic, prognostic, or therapeutic intention. In verified clinical stage I nonseminoma, RPLND provides one of three adjuvant options. To verify the clinical stage pathologically, surgery is done for diagnostic reasons, since CT scanning provides a false-negative staging in up to 30%. In higher stage lesions RPLND is a therapeutic procedure. The importance, however, of RPLND in clinical stage I nonseminoma is decreasing, since prognostic factors are available to stratify patients with either low or high risk for recurrence. Thus, these patients are selected for surveillance (low risk) or adjuvant chemotherapy (high risk). RPLND after chemotherapy is done for resection of residual tumor with a therapeutic intention. The histology of the residual mass is of prognostic importance and may help define further therapy. Resection of retroperitoneal metastases in patients with chemorefractory tumors is curative in about 25%.

[Use of high-dosage chemotherapy with autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation as a first-line therapy for the patients with poor-prognosis testicular tumors]

BACKGROUND

High-dose chemotherapy followed by hematopoietic stem cell support can be used as a first-line treatment in patients with germ-cell tumor (GCT) with poor prognosis. Long-term survival rate is attained in 50% of these patients. The aim of this paper was to present the experience at the Department of Hematology, Military Medical Academy, with high-dose cytostatic therapy as first-line chemotherapy in GCT patients with poor prognosis.

METHODS

Between 1997 and 2003, five patients with high-risk germ-cell tumors were treated with high-dosage chemotherapy followed by an autologous stem cell transplantation. All the patients were with non-seminomatous germ-cell tumors with mixed histology, and one was with extragonadal retroperitoneal germ-cell tumor.

RESULTS

The follow-up period ranged from 8 to 33 months. Three patients achieved complete remision, two patients only partial remision, and one was not followed-up. One patient was with residual tumor resection, using retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy, after autologous stem cell transplantation. All the patients were treated according to standard protocols.

CONCLUSION

Early high-dose chemotherapy associated with hematopoietic stem cell support as a first-line treatment in the patients with germ-cell tumor with a poor prognosis, represented an efficient treatment modality.

[Retroperitoneal lymph node dissection in testis cancer]

According to the rules of the European Interdisciplinary Consensus, retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) will be indicated less frequently in patients with nonseminomatous testis cancer. In clinical stage I it will be done only exceptionally and in stage II A only in marker-negative patients. In all other stages RPLND will be recommended as residual tumor resection and additionally in "growing teratoma syndrome" and in rare situations as "desperation surgery." It will be difficult in future using the minor operations to enter the learning curve. Only advanced situations will have to be managed by urological surgeons. These operations will have to be performed predominantly in specialised centres.

Laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection: Duplication of open technique

Laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection has been used to stage germ cell testicular cancer. Since its initial description, this minimally invasive procedure has evolved into a therapeutic operation that adheres to established strict oncologic principles. A modified template dissection that fully duplicates the open technique is now routinely performed at our institution. We describe and show in the accompanying video segments a laparoscopic modified template dissection.