Review article Salvage surgery for locally recurrent prostate cancer after radiation therapy

Salvage prostatectomy in patients who have failed radiation therapy or cryotherapy as primary treatment for prostate cancer

Asymptomatic prostate-specific antigen (PSA) recurrence after radiation therapy for prostate carcinoma poses a diagnostic and therapeutic dilemma for clinicians. Patients with locally recurrent disease can consider treatment options of salvage surgery, cryotherapy, watchful waiting, or androgen deprivation. Of these options, only salvage surgery has been shown to result in long-term disease-free survival for selected patients. However, salvage surgery is associated with significant morbidity, including urinary incontinence and rectal injuries. Ideally, salvage surgery outcomes can be optimized with careful patient selection according to clinical stage, serum PSA levels before radiation and surgery, the medical condition of the patient, and clear expectations of the physician and patient. Among patients with locally recurrent disease, those with localized prostate carcinoma amenable to radical prostatectomy before radiation or cryotherapy would be the most suitable candidates for salvage surgery.

Salvage radical prostatectomy

Although technically challenging, salvage prostatectomy for radiorecurrent prostate cancer is an effective option in carefully selected patients and offers the best chance for cure and long-term survival. Alternatively, cystoprostatectomy may be indicated in some patients who have a small capacity fibrotic bladder or intractable voiding symptoms related to radiation cystitis. Good long-term results can be expected in this patient group; however, exenterative surgery in patients with locally advanced disease is associated with comparably inferior results and should not be advocated. If cystectomy is necessary, orthotopic urinary diversion can be performed safely in young motivated patients who wish to maintain a better quality of life with associated morbidity. Although the higher rate of incontinence and impotence after salvage procedures may detract from the quality of life, the impact of these long-term complications on the patient's overall well-being is less than previously believed, and most patients are satisfied with their treatment outcome and adjust well to the circumstances, accepting some increased degree of morbidity. This observation emphasizes the value of careful preoperative counseling and the discussion of treatment options and outcomes, which also should incorporate quality of life issues.