The significance of one occluded internal carotid artery

Cascade of Complications Following Carotid Body Tumor Excision

Carotid body tumor excision can lead to various complications including vascular injury and pseudoaneurysm formation. Here we describe a case of carotid body tumor excision followed by series of complications including pseudoaneurysm formation, failure of primary surgical repair, carotid stump syndrome following parent artery occlusion, and persistent hypotension.

Carotid Stump Syndrome: An Uncommon Cause of Recurrent Ipsilateral Strokes

Carotid stump syndrome is a rare cause of recurrent cerebrovascular accidents. Carotid stump is the patent proximal remnant below the completely occluded internal carotid artery (ICA). Cerebral and retinal ischemic symptoms seen after complete occlusion of ipsilateral ICA is known as carotid stump syndrome. Known for causing recurrent ipsilateral cerebrovascular accidents, it is a potentially treatable entity. The therapeutic goal is medical management with a statin, dual anti-platelet therapy along with surgical intervention either with an endovascular repair or carotid endarterectomy. Herein, we present a case of carotid stump syndrome managed medically.

Carotid stump syndrome: A case report

Carotid stump syndrome (CSS) is known to be one of the causes of recurrent ipsilateral ischemic stroke following the occlusion of the internal carotid artery (ICA). The present study describes a case of left CSS in a 50-year-old patient presenting with a central retinal artery embolism following internal carotid and middle cerebral artery occlusion. The central retinal artery embolism was believed to be a consequence of microemboli, which originated from the stump of the occluded ICA, passing into the ophthalmic artery due to external carotid-internal carotid anastomotic channels, although the other possible pathophysiological causes of this condition are discussed. Digital subtraction angiography of the patient showed trickle flow in the occluded ICA during the venous phase, by which the stump emboli may have been transported to the ophthalmic artery. The patient was successfully treated with anticoagulation therapy without surgical or endovascular treatment.

Safety and efficacy of surgical treatment of carotid stump syndrome: pilot study

Surgical exclusion of the internal carotid artery (ICA) stump combined with endarterectomy of the external carotid artery is an established treatment approach. The aim of this pilot study was to compare the risk of cerebrovascular events between surgical treatment and best medical treatment in patients with ICA occlusion and carotid stump syndrome. Forty patients (23 males; age: 43-80 years; mean age: 61.1 ± 9.0 years) with carotid occlusion and carotid stump syndrome were enrolled. Ten patients with asymptomatic ICA occlusion and 10 patients with symptomatic ICA occlusion and carotid stump syndrome were enrolled to the best medical therapy group. Patients with chronic ICA occlusion, carotid stump syndrome, and one (15 patients) or recurrent (three patients) episodes of ipsilateral stroke or transient ischemic attack were enrolled to the surgical group. Neurological examination was undertaken on the day of randomization and then every 6 months in all patients for 4 years. All vascular events and death were recorded. Only one vascular event occurred in patients with symptomatic ICA occlusion without recurrent stroke or transient ischemic attack who were treated medically. No other vascular event was noted in the other subgroups. One patient with symptomatic carotid occlusion without recurrent stroke died due to myocardial infarction 6 months after surgery. Surgical treatment of carotid stump syndrome seems to be a safe procedure. Nevertheless, the benefit of a surgical approach in comparison with the best medical treatment is not clear.

Carotid stump syndrome: pathophysiology and endovascular treatment options

Carotid stump syndrome is one of the recognised causes of recurrent ipsilateral cerebrovascular events after occlusion of the internal carotid artery. It is believed that microemboli arising from the stump of the occluded internal carotid artery or the ipsilateral external carotid artery can pass into the middle cerebral artery circulation as a result of patent external carotid-internal carotid anastomotic channels. Different pathophysiologic causes of this syndrome and endovascular options for treatment are discussed.

Carotid Stump Syndrome: Outcome from Surgical Management

OBJECTIVES

in patients with occluded internal carotid arteries the carotid stump is a potential source of microemboli resulting in the persistence of retinal or cerebral ischaemic symptoms. We report 25 patients who had persistent cerebral and retinal ischaemic symptoms with an occluded ipsilateral ICA and a carotid stump who underwent surgical exclusion of the stump.

METHODS

between January 1988 and January 1998, 332 patients underwent carotid endarterectomy. Twenty-five patients (20 males: five females; mean age 58.9 (range 44-78 years)) had carotid stump exclusion. Indications for surgery were transient ischaemic attack (22), amaurosis fugax (eight) and cerebrovascular accident (13). Three patients had undergone contralateral carotid endarterectomy and 12 had significant contralateral stenosis. Twenty patients were being treated with aspirin and four with warfarin at the time of presentation.

RESULTS

the diagnosis of carotid stump was made in 22 patients by angiography. In the remaining three patients duplex alone was diagnostic in two patients. In the third case duplex was combined with magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) to confirm the diagnosis. Stump exclusion was carried out by oversewing the ICA origin. All but one patient remained symptom free at follow-up.

CONCLUSION

carotid stump syndrome should be considered as a likely clinical entity in patients with an occluded ICA and persisting cerebral and retinal microembolic symptoms. Surgical exclusion of the carotid stump is a safe and effective method of treatment.

Reconstructive surgery of the extracranial arteries

The first carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is usually accredited to Eastcott who reported in 1954 the successful incision of a diseased carotid bulb with end-to-end anastomosis of the internal carotid artery (ICA) to the common carotid artery (CCA). During the following years surgeons were quick to adopt and improve the intuitively attractive procedure. But by the early to mid 1980s several leading neurologists began to question the growing number of CEAs performed at that time. Six major CEA trials were then designed which are now completed or nearing completion. Most conclusive data are available from the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) for symptomatic carotid disease, and from the Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study (ACAS) for asymptomatic carotid disease. The key result of these studies is that CEA is beneficial to high grade symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid stenosis. While the benefit in symptomatic disease is clear, it may be negligible in asymptomatic patients suffering from other medical conditions, the most important being coronary artery disease. Since the conclusions from the different studies vary significantly, guidelines and recommendations with regard to CEA have been issued by a number of interest groups, so-called consensus conferences. The best known guidelines are published by the American Heart Association (AHA). However, the practice of interest groups to issue guidelines is currently being criticized, the main reason being that interest groups have different ideas and all claim the right to issue guidelines. At present we recommend CEA for symptomatic high-grade stenosis in patients without significant coincident disease. With regard to asymptomatic stenosis we suggest surgery to otherwise healthy patients if the stenosis is very narrow or progressive. Preoperative evaluation has changed over the years. Currently we recommend duplex sonography in combination with intra- and extracranial magnetic resonance angiography (MRA). Concurrent coronary artery disease is a major consideration in the perioperative management, and the use of a specific algorithm is recommended. Surgery is performed under general anaesthesia with intraoperative monitoring such as electroencephalography (EEG) and transcranial Doppler (TCD). A temporary intraluminal shunt is used selectively if after cross-clamping the flow velocity in the middle cerebral artery (MCA) falls to below 30 to 40% of baseline. For years we employed routine barbiturate neuroprotection during cross-clamping. At the present time we use barbiturate selectively, if the flow velocity in the MCA falls to below 30 to 40% of baseline and if the use of a temporary intraluminal shunt is not possible due to difficult anatomic conditions. The reason to abandon systematic barbiturate protection was to accelerate recovery from anaesthesia. Our patients are monitored overnight on the ICU or a surveillance unit. Routine hospitalization after surgery is 5 to 7 days with a control duplex sonography being performed prior to discharge. A number of details with regard to surgical technique and perioperative management are a matter of discussion. Our surgical routine is described here step by step. Such management resulted in 6 major complications among the 402 cases with 4 of cardiopulmonary and 2 of cerebrovascular origin. For the future we can expect the development of percutaneous transluminal techniques competing with standard carotid endarterectomy. At the present time several comparative studies are under way. Irrespective of the technical approach to treat carotid stenosis, several other issues have to be clarified before long. One of the major unresolved items is the timing of treatment after completed stroke. In this regard prospective trials need to be performed. Although numerically not as important as carotid stenosis, vertebral artery (VA) and subclavian artery (SA) stenoses are more and more accepted as indication for surgical