Connective tissue response to root surfaces resected with Nd:YAG laser or burs

Lasers in Apicoectomy: A Brief Review

Since the invention of laser, various applications for lasers in endodontics have been proposed, such as disinfection of the root canal system, canal shaping, pulp diagnosis, and apico-ectomy. One of the major applications of laser in endodontics is apicoectomy. The aim of this article is to review the benefits and drawbacks of laser applications in apicoectomy, including effect on apical seal, effect on dentin permeability, effect on postsurgery pain, effect on crack formation, effect on root-end morphology, effect on treatment outcome, and connective tissue response to laser-treated dentin.

An in vitro evaluation of apicoectomies and retropreparations using different methods

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to evaluate: 1) the apical root surface, gutta-percha interface, and preparation time of root-end resections made with burs, ultrasound, or laser; and 2) the thickness of surrounding dentin after laser or ultrasonic root-end cavity preparation.

STUDY DESIGN

1) Thirty root-filled teeth were resected as follows: Zekrya bur in group I, Chemical Vapor Deposition (CVD) ultrasonic tip (9.5107-8) in group II, and ErCr:YSGG (Waterlase) in group III. The preparation time was recorded. Replicas of the resected root-ends were examined under a scanning electron microscope (SEM). 2) Thirty root-filled teeth were submitted to apicectomies and root-end cavities were prepared by using: CVD (6.1107-6) ultrasonic retrotips (group IV), EMS (DT-060) ultrasonic retrotips (group V), and ErCr:YSGG laser tips (group VI). Replicas of the root apices were examined under a SEM.

RESULTS

There were no fissures or fractures on root-end surfaces. The bur produced the smoothest surface (P < .05). Group I had the lowest preparation time (P < .05). The best adaptation between the filling and the root canals walls was observed in group III, but it was not significantly different from group II (P < .05). No resected root-ends had cracks after preparation. Group VI showed the least minimum dentin thickness (P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

The 3 methods evaluated did not cause any injury to the root-end surface, but they harmed the apical adaptation. Laser tips removed more dentin than ultrasonic retrotips and should be used with care to avoid overpreparation.

Modern Endodontic Surgery Concepts and Practice: A Review

Endodontic surgery has now evolved into endodontic microsurgery. By using state-of-the-art equipment, instruments and materials that match biological concepts with clinical practice, we believe that microsurgical approaches produce predictable outcomes in the healing of lesions of endodontic origin. In this review we attempted to provide the most current concepts, techniques, instruments and materials with the aim of demonstrating how far we have come. Our ultimate goal is to assertively teach the future generation of graduate students and also train our colleagues to incorporate these techniques and concepts into everyday practice.

Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) and Optical Microscopy: Effects of Er:YAG and Nd:YAG Lasers on Apical Seals after Apicoectomy and Retrofill

OBJECTIVE

This study evaluated the dentinal and marginal permeability of the cut surface after apicoectomy, treatment and retrocavity preparation with Er:YAG and Nd:YAG lasers. Furthermore, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analysed the morphological alteration of dentin caused by laser irradiation through an optical fiber.

BACKGROUND DATA

Numerous studies have shown the beneficial effects of laser treatment upon sealing dental apex, avoiding the changes of organic fluids, microorganisms and their by-products between the root canal system and periapex.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-four extracted and endodontically treated teeth were divided into three groups: GI, apices were resected with Er:YAG laser (350 mJ; 4 Hz) treatment of cut dentinal surface and retrocavity were lased with this same laser (120 mJ; 4 Hz; bur 2051) using the optical fiber 50/10; GII, apicoectomy was performed similar to GI, however the cut dentinal surface was treated with Nd:YAG laser through optical fiber, as well as the retrocavity preparation (100 mJ; 15 Hz; 1.5 W); and GIII (control group), high speed burs were used.

RESULTS

Analysis of methylene blue dye penetration into dentin demonstrated that the specimens of the groups irradiated with laser showed to have lower infiltration indices than the control group. These results were compatible with structural and morphological injuries, evidenced by SEM.

CONCLUSION

Under the conditions of the present study, apicoectomy using Er:YAG laser, followed by dentinal surface irradiation and retrocavity preparation with Nd:YAG laser, showed to be an alternative clinical tool able to reduce the dentinal permeability.

Lasers in endodontics: a review

Since the development of the ruby laser by Maiman in 1960 and the application of the laser for endodontics by Weichman in 1971, a variety of papers on potential applications for lasers in endodontics have been published. The purpose of this paper is to summarize laser applications in endodontics, including their use in pulp diagnosis, dentinal hypersensitivity, pulp capping and pulpotomy, sterilization of root canals, root canal shaping and obturation and apicectomy. The effects of laser on root canal walls and periodontal tissues are also reviewed. The essential question is whether a laser can provide equal or improved treatment over conventional care. Secondary issues include treatment duration and cost/benefit ratio. This article reviews the role of lasers in endodontics since the early 1970s, summarizes many research reports from the last decade, and surmises what the future may hold for lasers in endodontics. With the potential availability of many new laser wavelengths and modes, much interest is developing in this promising field.

Susceptibility of Nd:YAG laser-irradiated root surfaces in replanted teeth to external inflammatory resorption

Nd:YAG laser-induced modification of the root surface may inhibit development of external inflammatory resorption in replanted teeth. This study tested this hypothesis in vivo. The pulp chambers of six mandibular premolars in each of two dogs were accessed, inoculated with plaque, and sealed (Groups 1, 2). Two additional premolars in each dog were endodontically treated without inoculation (Groups 3, 4). After 2 weeks, teeth were hemisected and extracted. Each root had a 2 x 3 mm surface area denuded of cementum on the buccal and lingual surface. In Groups 1 (n = 12 roots) and 3 (n = 4), the denuded surfaces were wiped with 15% EDTA, coated with black ink, and irradiated with Nd:YAG laser (0.75 W, 15 pps, 300 microns tip, 20 s). In Groups 2 (n = 12) and 4 (n = 4), the surfaces were wiped with 15% EDTA, and rinsed with sterile saline for 20 s. Roots were replanted within 5 min. The dogs were perfusion-euthanised 10 weeks after replantation. Block specimens were removed, decalcified, embedded and horizontally sectioned (6 microns) at 180-microns intervals, resulting in 10 to 14 cross-sections of each root. From these, the middle five consecutive sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin, and observed by light microscopy for occurrence of surface, inflammatory and replacement resorption on the denuded surfaces. No obvious differences were noted between the laser-irradiated and non-irradiated surfaces. Inflammatory resorption was frequent in Groups 1 and 2, and absent in Groups 3 and 4. Replacement resorption was minimal in Groups 1 and 2, and frequent in Groups 3 and 4. Differences between Groups 1 and 2, and between Groups 3 and 4 were not significant, whereas the differences between the two pairs of groups were statistically significant (chi-square and two-way ANOVA, P < 0.006). These results did not support the hypothesis, and questioned the clinical validity of the surface modification in Nd:YAG laser-irradiated dentin. Therefore, the clinical application of Nd:YAG laser to the root surfaces of replanted teeth is not warranted.