An in vivo and in vitro comparison of inhaled steroid delivery via a novel vortex actuator and a conventional valved holding chamber

[Critical evaluation of inhalation spacer devices available in France]

OBJECTIVE

To identify the spacer devices sold in France and to provide a critical evaluation in the light of the published data.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We contacted the pharmaceutical companies, manufacturers and distributors of each spacer in order to obtain their technical parameters and the results of any in vitro or in vivo studies. A review of the literature via PubMed completed the first set of data. We were interested in the quantity of fine particles (less than 5 μm diameter) obtained with a cascade impactor at paediatric flow rates, for all inhaled drugs available in France.

RESULTS

Eleven spacer devices were available in 2013 in France (Ablespacer®, Aerochamber Plus®, Babyhaler®, VHC Arrow®, L'Espace®, Funhaler®, Inhaler®, Itinhaler®, OptiChamber Diamond®, Tipshaler® and Vortex®), but three are no longer manufactured (Babyhaler®, Funhaler® and Inhaler®). All were small volume spacers, sold with facial masks of several different sizes. Four were antistatic (Aerochamber Plus®, Intinhaler®, OptiChamber Diamond® and Vortex®). Only salbutamol was tested with all the devices. Inhaled corticosteroids were tested with some and combinations were studied only with Ablespacer®, Aerochamber Plus®, Itinhaler®, and Vortex®. The results were difficult to interpret because the studies were conducted with very different protocols. The only clinical studies were conducted with Aerochamber Plus®, L'Espace® and Vortex®.

CONCLUSION

There was a great disparity between commercialized spacer devices in terms of the available data describing their in vitro performance.

Airway and systemic effects of soluble and suspension formulations of nebulized budesonide in asthmatic children

BACKGROUND

Using cyclodextrin with budesonide enables it to be formulated in a solution for nebulization.

OBJECTIVE

To observe the effects of a Captisol-enabled budesonide solution (CBIS), 60 microg twice daily, delivered via a nebulizer (eFlow), compared with a conventional budesonide suspension (Pulmicort Respules), 250 microg twice daily, delivered via another nebulizer (LC Plus), using fraction of exhaled nitric oxide (FE(NO)) and overnight urinary cortisol to creatinine ratio as the primary outcomes for efficacy and systemic bioactivity.

METHODS

A randomized, open-label, crossover study was conducted in 12 children with mild-to-moderate persistent asthma (aged 5-12 years). Measurements were performed after a 2-week steroid washout at baseline and at the end of each 2-week randomized treatment.

RESULTS

The nebulization time was shorter (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.83-5.63 minutes; P = .03) with CBIS (mean, 1.77 minutes) than with Pulmicort Respules (mean, 5.01 minutes). The reduction in FE(NO) with CBIS from pooled baseline was 2.45-fold (95% CI, 1.87-3.21; P < .001); and with Pulmicort Respules, 3.18-fold (95% CI, 2.26-4.47; P < .001). No statistically significant changes from pooled baseline in lung function and overnight urinary cortisol to creatinine ratio were observed with either treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

The nebulization time was shorter with CBIS compared with Pulmicort Respules. Both formulations exhibited similar anti-inflammatory activity in terms of reducing FE(NO), with no detectable difference between them when used in a putative microgram nominal dose ratio of 1:4. Neither formulation produced significant adrenal suppression.

Symptoms, spirometry, exhaled nitric oxide, and asthma exacerbations in clinical practice

BACKGROUND

Patient symptoms, spirometry measurements, exacerbation rates, and exhaled nitric oxide (FE(NO)) levels have all been used to quantify asthma severity.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the relationships among these disease surrogates in clinical practice.

METHODS

Data were collected from 5 primary care asthma clinics on patient symptoms, reliever use, spirometry measurements, maintenance pharmacotherapy, disease severity (British Thoracic Society treatment step), and FE(NO) level. Exacerbation data (asthma-related unscheduled health care contact or rescue oral corticosteroid therapy) for the 12 months before and 3 months after the clinic visit were then obtained.

RESULTS

A total of 267 adult asthmatic patients (mean [SEM] age, 51.6 [1.1] years; forced expiratory volume in 1 second, 86.3% [1.2%] of predicted) participated, and 157 exacerbations were captured. For the 12 months before the clinic visit, exacerbation rate was positively correlated with dose of inhaled corticosteroid (P < .001), treatment step (P < .001), reliever use (P = .002), and symptom score (P < .001) but was negatively correlated with FE(NO) level (P = .04); only symptom scores correlated with exacerbation rate in the 3 months after the visit. Levels of FE(NO) were significantly lower in frequently exacerbating patients receiving higher doses of maintenance inhaled corticosteroids compared with patients with mild disease who were corticosteroid naive (19.7 vs 40.4 ppb, P < .001). Measurement of FE(NO) was an insensitive method (sensitivity, 66.7%; specificity, 51.9% at a cutoff value of 20 ppb) for identifying patients who subsequently exacerbated.

CONCLUSION

Levels of FE(NO) are paradoxically decreased in patients with more severe asthma and frequent exacerbations and may, therefore, be of limited utility in primary care.

Respirable dose delivery of fluticasone propionate from a small valved holding chamber, a compact breath actuated integrated vortex device and a metered dose inhaler

AIMS

To compare the respirable dose delivery of the hydrofluroalkane fluticasone propionate (HFA-FP) via an optimally prepared Aerochamber Plus spacer (AP), via a Synchro-Breathe (SB) device, and pMDI Evohaler (EH).

METHODS

Seventeen mild to moderate asthmatics completed the study using a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, three way crossover design. Single doses of placebo or HFA-FP 2.0 mg were administered via the EH, AP, and SB devices. The overnight urinary cortisol : creatinine ratio (OUCC) was measured at baseline and after each dose.

RESULTS

Significant suppression of OUCC occurred from baseline with AP and SB but not EH devices (geometric mean fold suppression, 95% CI): AP: 3.18 (2.29, 4.36), P < 0.001; SB: 1.79 (1.31, 2.40), P = 0.001; EH: 1.12 (0.69, 1.44), p = 0.37 (equating to 68%, 45% and 9% falls, respectively). Significant differences in OUCC between devices were as follows: (geometric mean fold difference, 95% CI): AP vs. EH. 2.83 (2.09, 3.82), P < 0.001; AP vs. SB: 1.78 fold (1.21, 2.60), P = 0.003; SB vs. EH: 1.59 (1.09, 2.31), P = 0.013 (equating to 65%, 44% and 37% differences, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of an optimally prepared AP spacer and breath actuated SB device, when compared with pMDI, significantly increased the respirable dose of HFA-FP.