Circulating stem cell factor in patients with chronic idiopathic urticaria

Markers for the involvement of endothelial cells and the coagulation system in chronic urticaria: A systematic review

Chronic urticaria (CU) is a chronic inflammatory mast cell-driven disorder. Endothelial cells (ECs) contribute importantly to key features of CU. Several markers of EC (dys)function in CU have been reported, but have not yet been systematically reviewed. In this study, we systematically reviewed and categorized all published markers of EC functions in CU through a comprehensive search in Pubmed, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and SCOPUS using the following Mesh terms: CU AND pathogenesis AND (vasculopathy OR microangiopathy OR ECs OR marker). In total, 79 articles were selected and the identified biomarkers were categorized according to EC (dys)function in CU. The most frequent and consistently reported upregulated biomarkers in CU skin were adhesion molecules, TF, and P-selectin. The most frequently reported upregulated and reliable biomarkers in sera of CU patients were F1+2 for coagulation cascade involvement, D-dimers for fibrinolysis, and MMP-9 for vascular permeability. Emerging biomarkers described in the selected articles were endostatin, heat shock proteins, cleaved high molecular weight kininogen, and adipokines. This systematic review contributes to the pool of growing evidence for vascular involvement in CU where EC dysfunction is present in different aspects of cell survival, maintenance of vascular structure, and coagulation/fibrinolysis balance.

In chronic spontaneous urticaria, high numbers of dermal endothelial cells, but not mast cells, are linked to recurrent angio-oedema

BACKGROUND

Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) is an inflammatory skin disorder characterized by recurrent weals, angio-oedema or both. Recent studies have shown that the number of endothelial cells is increased in the skin of patients with CSU, but the underlying mechanisms and clinical implications of this are unclear.

AIM

To evaluate whether mast cell (MC) or endothelial cell (EC) numbers correlate with CSU and whether they are relevant for disease duration, disease activity or the presence of clinical features.

METHODS

We determined the numbers of CD31+ ECs and MCs in nonlesional skin of 30 patients with CSU using quantitative histomorphometry, and assessed their correlation with each other and with clinical features such as disease duration, disease activity and occurrence of angio-oedema.

RESULTS

The numbers of MCs and ECs were high in the nonlesional skin of patients with CSU, but did not correlate with each other. Neither MC number nor EC number correlated with disease duration or disease activity. Interestingly, patients with high numbers of cutaneous CD31+ ECs had higher rates of recurrent angio-oedema and vice versa.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on these findings, we speculate that vascular remodelling and MC hyperplasia in patients with CSU occurs independently and via different mechanisms. Targeting of the mechanisms that drive neoangiogenesis in CSU may result in novel therapeutic strategies for the management of patients with angio-oedema.

Mesenchymal Stem Cells from Adipose Tissue in Clinical Applications for Dermatological Indications and Skin Aging

Operating at multiple levels of control, mesenchymal stem cells from adipose tissue (ADSCs) communicate with organ systems to adjust immune response, provide signals for differentiation, migration, enzymatic reactions, and to equilibrate the regenerative demands of balanced tissue homeostasis. The identification of the mechanisms by which ADSCs accomplish these functions for dermatological rejuvenation and wound healing has great potential to identify novel targets for the treatment of disorders and combat aging. Herein, we review new insights into the role of adipose-derived stem cells in the maintenance of dermal and epidermal homeostasis, and recent advances in clinical applications of ADSCs related to dermatology.

Eosinophils in chronic urticaria: supporting or leading actors?

Although their number may be increased in skin lesions, eosinophils have been rather neglected as possible participants to the pathogenesis of chronic urticaria because of the absence of peripheral eosinophilia in patients with this disease. However, recent data suggest a potentially relevant role played by activated eosinophils both in triggering the tissue factor pathway of coagulation cascade and as a source of vascular endothelial growth factor. Such phenomena seem more pronounced in patients showing a more severe disease. The present study will rediscuss the potential role of this cell line in chronic urticaria in the light of these recent observations.

Plasma levels and skin-eosinophil-expression of vascular endothelial growth factor in patients with chronic urticaria

BACKGROUND

Although chronic urticaria (CU) is often regarded as autoimmune in nature, only less than 50% of sera from CU patients contain histamine-releasing autoantibodies. This suggests that other factors may contribute to its pathogenesis. We evaluated the possible involvement of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), one of the major mediators of vascular permeability, in CU.

METHODS

Eighty consecutive adult patients with CU and 53 healthy subjects were studied. VEGF and prothrombin fragment F(1+2) were measured by enzyme immunoassays. Autologous plasma skin test (APST) was performed in CU patients and, in six of them, skin biopsy specimens were taken from wheals to evaluate the immunohistochemical expression of VEGF and eosinophil cationic protein (ECP).

RESULTS

Plasma VEGF concentrations were higher in CU patients (8.00 +/- 0.90 pmol/l) than in controls (0.54 +/- 0.08 pmol/l) (P = 0.0001) and tended to parallel both the severity of CU and to correlate with F(1+2) levels. APST was positive in 85.1% of patients. VEGF concentration was significantly higher in APST-positive than in APST-negative patients (P = 0.0003). Immunohistochemically, all specimens from patients with CU showed a strong expression of VEGF (P = 0.002) that colocalized with ECP, a classic eosinophil marker.

CONCLUSIONS

VEGF plasma levels are elevated in CU and parallel the disease severity. This supports a possible role of this molecule in CU pathophysiology. Eosinophils are the main cellular source of VEGF in CU lesional skin.

Basophils and mast cells in chronic idiopathic urticaria

Chronic idiopathic urticaria (CIU) is diagnosed in patients when urticarial eruptions recur for more than 6 weeks, and no specific cause is determined. Given that urticaria resembles the lesions induced by injection of histamine or allergen into the skin, a role for mast cells or basophils has been proposed in the generation of localized urticarial lesions. However, currently, the exact mechanisms governing regional mast cell or basophil activation are unknown. In the past decade, there has been mounting interest in viewing CIU as an autoimmune disease, given the presence of circulating autoantibodies to IgE or the alpha subunit of the high-affinity IgE receptor (FceRI) in a subset of patients. In this review, we propose that in addition to autoantibodies, specific differences in the expression of FceRI-signaling molecules in the basophils or mast cells of CIU patients may contribute to the generation of urticarial eruptions.

No evidence of increased serum substance P levels in chronic urticaria patients with and without demonstrable circulating vasoactive factors

The neuropeptide substance P is a possible candidate as histamine-releasing factor in some patients with chronic ordinary urticaria (COU), particularly in those with evidence of a nonautoantibody circulating histamine-releasing factor. In this study, serum substance P levels were measured by enzyme immunoassay in 117 COU patients, 40 atopic subjects and 24 normal subjects. In vivo and in vitro assays for histamine-releasing factors, autologous serum skin test (ASST) and basophil histamine release (BHR) assay, respectively, were performed in all COU patients. Mean serum substance P concentration was not significantly different in COU patients and in normal subjects; however, significantly higher levels were detected in atopic subjects than in COU patients (P < 0.003). ASST and BHR assays allowed us to distinguish different subsets of COU patients. Mean serum substance P concentration did not vary significantly in the different subsets of patients. Nevertheless, interestingly three patients with positive ASST and negative BHR assay showed very high substance P levels. These results suggest that substance P does not play an important role as histamine-releasing factor in COU in general but only in occasional patients in whom it might act as a trigger of urticarial symptoms.