Serum levels of specific IgE, soluble interleukin-2 receptor, and soluble intercellular adhesion molecule-1 in seasonal allergic rhinitis

Anti-IL-5 therapies for asthma

BACKGROUND

This is the second update of previously published reviews in the Cochrane Library (2015, first update 2017). Interleukin-5 (IL-5) is the main cytokine involved in the proliferation, maturation, activation and survival of eosinophils, which cause airway inflammation and are a classic feature of asthma. Studies of monoclonal antibodies targeting IL-5 or its receptor (IL-5R) suggest they reduce asthma exacerbations, improve health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and lung function in appropriately selected patients, justifying their inclusion in the latest guidelines.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the effects of therapies targeting IL-5 signalling (anti-IL-5 or anti-IL-5Rα) with placebo on exacerbations, health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) measures and lung function in adults and children with chronic asthma, and specifically in those with eosinophilic asthma refractory to existing treatments.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, and two trials registers, manufacturers' websites, and reference lists of included studies. The most recent search was 7 February 2022.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials comparing mepolizumab, reslizumab and benralizumab versus placebo in adults and children with asthma.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently extracted data and analysed outcomes using a random-effects model. We used standard methods expected by Cochrane.

MAIN RESULTS

Seventeen studies on about 7600 participants met the inclusion criteria. Six used mepolizumab, five used reslizumab, and six used benralizumab. One study using benralizumab was terminated early due to sponsor decision and contributed no data. The studies were predominantly on people with severe eosinophilic asthma, which was similarly but variably defined. One was in children aged 6 to 17 years; nine others included children over 12 years but did not report results by age group separately. We deemed the overall risk of bias to be low, with all studies contributing data of robust methodology. We considered the certainty of the evidence for all comparisons to be high overall using the GRADE scheme, except for intravenous (IV) mepolizumab and subcutaneous (SC) reslizumab because these are not currently licensed delivery routes. The anti-IL-5 treatments assessed reduced rates of 'clinically significant' asthma exacerbation (defined by treatment with systemic corticosteroids for three days or more) by approximately half in participants with severe eosinophilic asthma on standard care (at least medium-dose inhaled corticosteroids (ICS)) with poorly controlled disease (either two or more exacerbations in the preceding year or Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) score of 1.5 or more), except for reslizumab SC. The rate ratios for these effects were 0.45 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.36 to 0.55; high-certainty evidence) for mepolizumab SC, 0.53 (95% CI 0.44 to 0.64; moderate-certainty evidence) for mepolizumab IV, 0.43 (95% CI 0.33 to 0.55; high-certainty evidence) for reslizumab IV, and 0.59 (95% CI 0.52 to 0.66; high-certainty evidence) for benralizumab SC. Non-eosinophilic participants treated with benralizumab also showed a significant reduction in exacerbation rates, an effect not seen with reslizumab IV, albeit in only one study. No data were available for non-eosinophilic participants treated with mepolizumab. There were improvements in validated HRQoL scores with all anti-IL-5 agents in severe eosinophilic asthma. This met the minimum clinically important difference (MCID) for the broader St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ; 4-point change) for benralizumab only, but the improvement in the ACQ and Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ), which focus on asthma symptoms, fell short of the MCID (0.5 point change for both ACQ and AQLQ) for all of the interventions. The evidence for an improvement in HRQoL scores in non-eosinophilic participants treated with benralizumab and reslizumab was weak, but the tests for subgroup difference were negative. All anti-IL-5 treatments produced small improvements in mean pre-bronchodilator forced expiratory flow in one second (FEV1) of between 0.08 L and 0.15 L in eosinophilic participants, which may not be sufficient to be detected by patients. There were no excess serious adverse events with any anti-IL-5 treatment; in fact, there was a reduction in such events with benralizumab, likely arising from fewer asthma-related hospital admissions. There was no difference compared to placebo in adverse events leading to discontinuation with mepolizumab or reslizumab, but significantly more discontinued benralizumab than placebo, although the absolute numbers were small (42/2026 (2.1%) benralizumab versus 11/1227 (0.9%) placebo). The implications for efficacy or adverse events are unclear.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Overall this analysis supports the use of anti-IL-5 treatments as an adjunct to standard care in people with severe eosinophilic asthma and poor symptom control. These treatments roughly halve the rate of asthma exacerbations in this population. There is limited evidence for improved HRQoL scores and lung function, which may not meet clinically detectable levels. The studies did not report safety concerns for mepolizumab or reslizumab, or any excess serious adverse events with benralizumab, although there remains a question over adverse events significant enough to prompt discontinuation. Further research is needed on biomarkers for assessing treatment response, optimal duration and long-term effects of treatment, risk of relapse on withdrawal, non-eosinophilic patients, children (particularly under 12 years), comparing anti-IL-5 treatments to each other and, in patients meeting relevant eligibility criteria, to other biological (monoclonal antibody) therapies. For benralizumab, future studies should closely monitor rates of adverse events prompting discontinuation.

Anti-IL5 therapies for asthma

BACKGROUND

This review is the first update of a previously published review in The Cochrane Library (Issue 7, 2015). Interleukin-5 (IL-5) is the main cytokine involved in the activation of eosinophils, which cause airway inflammation and are a classic feature of asthma. Monoclonal antibodies targeting IL-5 or its receptor (IL-5R) have been developed, with recent studies suggesting that they reduce asthma exacerbations, improve health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and lung function. These are being incorporated into asthma guidelines.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the effects of therapies targeting IL-5 signalling (anti-IL-5 or anti-IL-5Rα) with placebo on exacerbations, health-related qualify of life (HRQoL) measures, and lung function in adults and children with chronic asthma, and specifically in those with eosinophilic asthma refractory to existing treatments.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Airways Trials Register, clinical trials registries, manufacturers' websites, and reference lists of included studies. The most recent search was March 2017.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials comparing mepolizumab, reslizumab and benralizumab versus placebo in adults and children with asthma.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently extracted data and analysed outcomes using a random-effects model. We used standard methods expected by Cochrane.

MAIN RESULTS

Thirteen studies on 6000 participants met the inclusion criteria. Four used mepolizumab, four used reslizumab, and five used benralizumab. One study in benralizumab was terminated early due to sponsor decision and contributed no data. The studies were predominantly on people with severe eosinophilic asthma, which was similarly but variably defined. Eight included children over 12 years but these results were not reported separately. We deemed the risk of bias to be low, with all studies contributing data being of robust methodology. We considered the quality of the evidence for all comparisons to be high overall using the GRADE scheme, with the exception of intravenous mepolizumab because this is not currently a licensed delivery route.All of the anti-IL-5 treatments assessed reduced rates of 'clinically significant' asthma exacerbation (defined by treatment with systemic corticosteroids for three days or more) by approximately half in participants with severe eosinophilic asthma on standard of care (at least medium-dose inhaled corticosteroids (ICS)) with poorly controlled disease (either two or more exacerbations in the preceding year or Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) 1.5 or more). Non-eosinophilic participants treated with benralizumab also showed a significant reduction in exacerbation rates, but no data were available for non-eosinophilic participants, and mepolizumab or reslizumab.We saw modest improvements in validated HRQoL scores with all anti-IL-5 agents in severe eosinophilic asthma. However these did not exceed the minimum clinically important difference for ACQ and Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ), with St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) only assessed in two studies. The improvement in HRQoL scores in non-eosinophilic participants treated with benralizumab, the only intervention for which data were available in this subset, was not statistically significant, but the test for subgroup difference was negative.All anti-IL-5 treatments produced a small but statistically significant improvement in mean pre-bronchodilator forced expiratory flow in one second (FEV1) of between 0.08 L and 0.11 L.There were no excess serious adverse events with any anti-IL-5 treatment, and indeed a reduction in favour of mepolizumab that could be due to a beneficial effect on asthma-related serious adverse events. There was no difference compared to placebo in adverse events leading to discontinuation with mepolizumab or reslizumab, but significantly more discontinued benralizumab than placebo, although the absolute numbers were small (36/1599 benralizumab versus 9/998 placebo).Mepolizumab, reslizumab and benralizumab all markedly reduced blood eosinophils, but benralizumab resulted in almost complete depletion, whereas a small number remained with mepolizumab and reslizumab. The implications for efficacy and/or adverse events are unclear.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Overall our study supports the use of anti-IL-5 treatments as an adjunct to standard of care in people with severe eosinophilic asthma and poor control. These treatments roughly halve the rate of asthma exacerbations in this population. There is limited evidence for improved HRQoL scores and lung function, which may not meet clinically detectable levels. There were no safety concerns regarding mepolizumab or reslizumab, and no excess serious adverse events with benralizumab, although there remains a question over adverse events significant enough to prompt discontinuation.Further research is needed on biomarkers for assessing treatment response, optimal duration and long-term effects of treatment, risk of relapse on withdrawal, non-eosinophilic patients, children (particularly under 12 years), and comparing anti-IL-5 treatments to each other and, in people eligible for both, to anti-immunoglobulin E. For benralizumab, future studies should closely monitor rates of adverse events prompting discontinuation.

Possible Mechanism of Action of the Antiallergic Effect of an Aqueous Extract of Heliotropium indicum L. in Ovalbumin-Induced Allergic Conjunctivitis

Heliotropium indicum is used traditionally as a remedy for conjunctivitis in Ghana. This study therefore evaluated the antiallergic potential of an aqueous whole plant extract of Heliotropium indicum (HIE) in ovalbumin-induced allergic conjunctivitis and attempted to predict its mode of action. Clinical scores for allergic conjunctivitis induced by intraperitoneal ovalbumin sensitization (100 : 10 μg OVA/Al(OH)3 in phosphate-buffered saline [PBS]) and topical conjunctival challenge (1.5 mg OVA in 10 μL PBS) in Dunkin-Hartley guinea pigs were estimated after a week's daily treatment with 30-300 mg kg(-1) HIE, 30 mg kg(-1) prednisolone, 10 mg kg(-1) chlorpheniramine, or 10 mL kg(-1) PBS. Ovalbumin-specific IgG and IgE and total IgE in serum were estimated using Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay. Histopathological assessment of the exenterated conjunctivae was also performed. The 30 and 300 mg kg(-1) HIE treatment resulted in a significantly (p ≤ 0.001) low clinical score of allergic conjunctivitis. Ovalbumin-specific IgG and IgE as well as total serum IgE also decreased significantly (p ≤ 0.01-0.001). The conjunctival tissue in HIE treated guinea pigs had mild mononuclear infiltration compared to the PBS-treated ones, which had intense conjunctival tissue inflammatory infiltration. HIE exhibited antiallergic effect possibly by immunomodulation or immunosuppression.

Mepolizumab versus placebo for asthma

BACKGROUND

Mepolizumab is a human monoclonal antibody against interleukin-5 (IL-5), the main cytokine involved in the activation of eosinophils, which in turn causes airway inflammation. Recent studies have suggested these agents may have a role in reducing exacerbations and improving health-related quality of life (HRQoL). There are no recommendations for the use of mepolizumab in adults or children in the recent update of the BTS/SIGN guidelines (BTS/SIGN 2014).

OBJECTIVES

To compare the effects of mepolizumab with placebo on exacerbations and HRQoL in adults and children with chronic asthma.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Airways Group Register (CAGR) of trials, clinical trial registries, manufacturers' websites and the reference lists of included studies. Searches were conducted in November 2013 and updated in November 2014.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials comparing mepolizumab versus placebo in adults and children with asthma.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently extracted data and analysed outcomes using a random-effects model. We used standard methods expected by The Cochrane Collaboration.

MAIN RESULTS

Eight studies on 1707 participants met the inclusion criteria. Only two studies included children (over 12 years of age), but they did not report separate findings for the adolescents. Seven studies involved intravenous mepolizumab alone; one included a subcutaneous arm. There was heterogeneity in the severity and clinical pattern of asthma among the participants in the eight studies, varying from mild to moderate atopic asthma, to persistent asthma and eosinophilic asthma with recurrent exacerbations. Selection bias was a concern in several of the studies included in this review.Four trials compared intravenous mepolizumab to placebo in relation to HRQoL. Two studies measured scores from the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ), which showed a non-significant difference between mepolizumab and placebo (mean difference (MD) 0.21, 95% confidence interval (CI) - 0.01 to 0.44; participants = 682), in the direction favouring mepolizumab. The third study used the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) and found a significant difference between mepolizumab and placebo (MD 6.40, 95% CI 3.15 to 9.65; participants = 576), which indicated a clinically important benefit favouring mepolizumab. A fourth study noted that there was no significant difference but did not provide any data. The two studies in people with eosinophilic asthma showed a reduction in clinically significant exacerbation rates (Risk Ratio 0.52, 95% CI 0.43 to 0.64; participants = 690). However, an analysis of four studies that were not confined to people with eosinophilic asthma indicated considerable heterogeneity and no significant difference in people with one or more exacerbations between mepolizumab and placebo using a random-effects model (Risk Ratio 0.67, 95% CI 0.34 to 1.31; participants = 468; I(2) = 59%).The analysis of serious adverse events indicated a significant difference favouring mepolizumab (Risk ratio 0.49, 95% CI 0.30 to 0.80; participants = 1441; studies = 5; I(2) = 0%). It was not possible to combine the results for adverse events, and we deemed the quality of this evidence to be low.A single study compared subcutaneous mepolizumab to placebo in 385 adults with severe eosinophilic asthma and found an improvement in HRQoL scores and a reduction in asthma exacerbations, including exacerbations requiring admission to hospital.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

It is not possible to draw firm conclusions from this review with respect to the role of mepolizumab in patients with asthma. Our confidence in the results of this review are limited by the fact that the intravenous route is not currently licensed for mepolizumab, and the evidence for the currently licenced subcutaneous route is limited to a single study in participants with severe eosinophilic asthma.The currently available studies provide evidence that mepolizumab can lead to an improvement in health-related quality of life scores and reduce asthma exacerbations in people with severe eosinophilic asthma.Further research is needed to clarify which subgroups of patients with asthma could potentially benefit from this treatment. Dosage, ideal dosing regimens and duration of treatment need to be clarified, as the studies included in this review differed in their protocols. There are no studies reporting results from children, so we cannot comment on treatment for this age group. At the present time, larger studies using licenced treatment regimens are required to establish the role of mepolizumab in the treatment of severe asthma.

Clinical and immunologic changes after allergen immunotherapy with Hop Japanese pollen

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Hop Japanese (Hop J) pollen has been reported as one of the major causative pollen allergens in the autumn season. There have been no published data regarding the clinical and immunologic effects of Hop J pollen immunotherapy in sensitized patients. In this study, we evaluated clinical and immunologic effects of Hop J immunotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Pollens were collected in our area, and "Depo-Hop J" was prepared in the laboratory of Allergopharma (Reinbek, Germany). Fifteen asthmatic patients who had Hop J immunotherapy for > 1 year were enrolled. Their clinical parameters, such as asthma symptom scores, were monitored. Skin reactivity to Hop J and degree of airway hyperresponsiveness to methacholine were measured before and 1 year after the immunotherapy. Sera were collected before the immunotherapy, at the end of initial therapy, and 1 year after the therapy. Serum total IgE levels were compared by radioimmunoassay. Serum-specific IgE, IgG1, and IgG4 levels to Hop J were compared by ELISA. To evaluate the changes of cellular mechanisms, soluble CD30 (sCD30), soluble interleukin (IL)-2 receptor (sIL-2R), soluble CD23 (sCD23), and IL-10 levels were measured by ELISA.

RESULTS

Specific IgG1 and IgG4 levels began to increase at the end of the initial therapy (P < 0.05) with significant decreases in symptom scores (P < 0.05), whereas total and specific IgE levels showed variable responses during the immunotherapy with no statistical significance (P > 0.05). Serum sIL-2R and sCD30 levels decreased significantly (P < 0.05) 1 year after immunotherapy. No significant changes were noted in sCD23, IL-10, skin reactivity to Hop J, or airway responsiveness to methacholine (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

We are certain that Hop J allergen immunotherapy, if carried out properly according to suitable indications, can favorably influence asthma. Thus, an increase in specific IgG4 and IgG1 antibodies and reduction of a possible Th2 lymphocyte marker (sCD30) may be associated with symptomatic improvements.

Is it important to perform pollen skin prick tests in the season?

BACKGROUND

Seasonal exposure to pollens causes the characteristic symptoms of respiratory allergy as well as an increase in specific IgE levels and inflammatory mediator release. However, little is known about the effect of natural allergen exposure on the skin test reactivity of patients with seasonal allergy.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate the monthly variation in skin test reactions with pollen allergens during pollen season and its relation to pollen counts.

METHODS

Fifteen subjects with seasonal allergic rhinitis and/or asthma (4 male, 11 female) between the ages of 13 and 52 (mean 33.9 +/- 2.9) who lived in Ankara, Turkey were selected for this study. Patients were monitored from the beginning of March to the end of September 1997, and skin prick tests were performed using 5 grass, 12 tree, and 5 weed pollen allergen extracts every month. Atmospheric pollen grains were counted in the Ankara area between January and December, 1997.

RESULTS

There were small but statistically significant increases in tree pollen-induced wheal sizes in May when compared with other months (P < 0.05). Skin test reactivity was correlated with tree pollen counts (r = 0.978, P < 0.05). There was not a significant difference in skin test reactivity to grass and weed pollens between months.

CONCLUSIONS

Although skin test reactivity may be slightly greater to tree pollen during the tree pollen season, the timing of skin testing is not a critical determinant in patients with pollen allergy.

Soluble interleukin-2 receptor and interleukin-4 in sera of asthmatic children before and after a prednisolone course

BACKGROUND

Cytokine-mediated interactions among inflammatory cells may play a role in the pathogenesis of bronchial asthma.

OBJECTIVE

To understand the role of soluble interleukin-2 receptor (sIL-2R) and interleukin-4 (IL-4) in the disease activity of acute asthma, changes in serum concentrations of sIL-2R and IL-4 elaborated by activated T-lymphocyte before and after prednisolone therapy with clinical improvement were determined in the present study.

METHODS

Circulating levels of sIL-2R and IL-4 in sera from 15 normal control subjects and in sera from 20 allergic asthmatic children with acute exacerbation and in a stable condition were determined by using commercially available ELISA kits.

RESULTS

The mean concentration of serum sIL-2R was significantly higher in acute exacerbation than in children with stable asthma (368.9 +/- 395.4 pg/mL vs 291.2 +/- 361.0 pg/mL; P < .01) or in control subjects (124.6 +/- 17.8 pg/mL; P < .001). The mean concentration of serum IL-4 was higher in acute exacerbation (5.82 +/- 1.10 pg/mL) and in stable asthmatic patients (6.73 +/- 2.83 pg/mL) versus control group subjects (5.54 +/- 1.20 pg/mL). However, the difference was not statistically significant among the three study groups.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides further evidence that changes in serum IL-2R may serve as an objective indicator for clinical outcome of allergic asthmatic patients.

Allergen induced mRNA expression of interleukin-5, but not of interleukin-4 and interferon-gamma, in peripheral blood mononuclear cells obtained before the pollen season predicts the clinical efficacy of immunotherapy for seasonal allergic rhinitis

The primary aim of this study was to investigate whether the allergen-induced synthesis of cytokines by peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) obtained immediately before the pollen season could predict the clinical efficacy of immunotherapy during the following pollen season. PBMCs (1.0 x 106 cells/ml) were obtained from 17 nonatopic subjects and from 60 patients receiving immunotherapy for seasonal allergic rhinitis (caused by Japanese cedar pollens) immediately before the pollen season of 1998, and were cultured for 24 h in the presence of 10 mg/ml of Cry j 1, a major allergen of Japanese cedar pollens, at 37 degrees C in a fully humidified 5% CO2 atmosphere. Total cellular RNA was extracted from the PBMCs, and the allergen-induced interleukin (IL)-4, IL-5 and interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma) mRNA expression was determined using a reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction. According to the nasal symptoms during the pollen season of 1998, the 60 patients on immunotherapy were divided into 36 good responders (who had no nasal symptoms and no requirement for rescue medications) and 24 poor responders who needed rescue medications to control nasal symptoms. Neither IL-4 mRNA nor IL-5 mRNA was expressed in any of the 17 nonatopic individuals. By contrast, IL-4 mRNA was expressed in 26 good responders and in 22 poor responders, and IL-5 mRNA was expressed in eight good responders (22.2%) and in 23 poor responders (95.8%). IFN-gamma mRNA was expressed in four nonatopic subjects, in nine good responders and in seven poor responders. The expression of IFN-gamma did not differ significantly among the nonatopic subjects, the good responders and the poor responders. The mRNA expression of IL-5 (P < 0.0001), but not of IL-4 (P = 0.0999) and IFN-gamma (P = 0. 7713), differed significantly between the good and poor responders. Therefore, our study has highlighted that positive expression of IL-5 mRNA in PBMCs sampled immediately before the pollen season could be predictive of a poor clinical outcome of immunotherapy during the following pollen season and that the down-regulation of IL-5 mRNA expression in PBMCs could be an important mechanism of pollen immunotherapy related to the clinical efficacy.

Seasonal changes in phytohemagglutinin-induced cytokine synthesis by peripheral blood lymphocytes of patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis due to Japanese cedar pollens

We investigated the seasonal changes in non-specific stimulation-induced cytokine production by peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis due to Japanese cedar pollen. This study included 16 non-allergic healthy adult volunteers and 115 patients with detectable levels of Japanese cedar pollen-specific IgE in their serum. The 115 patients were divided into five groups, an asymptomatic group (specific IgE was positive but there were no nasal symptoms), a medication group (typical symptoms of Japanese cedar pollinosis and treated with antihistamine tablets), a good-IT group (responded well to immunotherapy), a poor-IT group (responded poorly to immunotherapy) and a cure group (no symptoms after discontinuation of immunotherapy). PBMCs (1.0 x 10(6) cells/ml) were collected before and during the cedar pollen season in 1998, and were cultured for 24 h in the presence of 10 micrograms/ml phytohemagglutinin. The concentrations of IL-4, IL-5 and IFN-gamma in the culture supernatants were measured by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. None of the levels of IL-4, IL-5 and IFN-gamma synthesized by PBMCs in the asymptomatic group, medication group, good-IT group, poor-IT group or cure group were significantly different from those in the non-atopic group. In the medication group, the synthesis of TH2-type cytokines (both IL-4 and IL-5), but not of TH1-type cytokine (IFN-gamma) was significantly increased during the pollen season compared with before the pollen season, whereas in the non-atopic group, the synthesis of IL-4, IL-5 and IFN-gamma did not differ significantly before and during the pollen season. The synthesis of both IL-4 and IL-5 was significantly increased during the pollen season in the poor-IT group, whereas the synthesis of IL-4 and IL-5 was not increased during the pollen season in the good-IT or cure groups. In conclusion, our study demonstrates that T-cell reactivity to non-specific stimulation outside of the pollen season did not differ between the patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis and non-atopic individuals, that T-cells in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis are affected or primed by the natural pollen exposure to synthesize TH2-type cytokines even in response to non-specific stimulation, and that successful immunotherapy could decrease the natural pollen exposure-primed hyperreactivity of TH2 cells to non-specific stimulants.

Suppression of seasonal increase in serum interleukin-5 is linked to the clinical efficacy of immunotherapy for seasonal allergic rhinitis

Although immunotherapy is recognized as a highly effective form of treatment for allergic rhinitis, especially pollen-induced seasonal allergic rhinitis, the mechanisms have not been fully established. In the present study, we investigated whether immunotherapy could affect the seasonal increase in interleukin-5 (IL-5) in the serum of patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis and whether the effect on IL-5 in serum is related to the clinical efficacy of immunotherapy. Venous blood was collected twice from each patient with seasonal allergic rhinitis due to Japanese cedar pollens, before and during the cedar pollen season in 1997, to determine the cedar pollen-specific IgE and IL-5 in serum. Both specific IgE and IL-5 in serum were significantly increased during the pollen season, not only in the poor responders to antihistamines but also in the good responders. Neither the rate of seasonal increase in specific IgE nor the rate of seasonal increase in IL-5 differed significantly between the good responders and the poor responders to antihistamines. Both specific IgE and IL-5 were significantly increased during the pollen season in the poor responders to immunotherapy, whereas neither specific IgE nor IL-5 was increased during the pollen season in the good responders to immunotherapy. The rate of seasonal increase in specific IgE as well as IL-5 was significantly smaller in the good responders than in the poor responders to immunotherapy. The rates of seasonal increase in specific IgE and in IL-5 were inversely correlated with the length of time on immunotherapy. However, the rate of seasonal increase in specific IgE was not significantly correlated with the rate of seasonal increase in IL-5. In conclusion, the suppression of the seasonal increase in IL-5 in serum is a working mechanism of immunotherapy related to the clinical efficacy of the treatment.