Pharmacologic therapy of portal hypertension and variceal hemorrhage

Gastrointestinal bleeding

Gastrointestinal bleeding is a common complaint encountered in the emergency department and frequent cause of hospitalization. Important diagnostic factors that increase morbidity and mortality include advanced age, serious comorbid conditions, hemodynamic instability, esophageal varices, significant hematemesis or melena, and marked anemia. Because gastrointestinal bleeding carries a 10% overall mortality rate, emergency physicians must perform timely diagnosis, aggressive resuscitation, risk stratification, and early consultation for these patients.

Changing trends in the epidemiology and clinical outcome of acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding in a defined geographical area in Greece

AIM

Acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding (AUGIB) remains a common medical emergency and an important cause of morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study was to evaluate changes in clinico-epidemiologic characteristics of patients who presented with AUGIB during the last 10 years.

METHODS

Data from all patients admitted with AUGIB in a defined geographical area in Greece from January 1 to December 31, 2005 (period B) were compared with retrospectively collected data from all patients admitted with AUGIB in the same area 10 years ago, from January 1 to December 31, 1995 (period A). The estimated incidence of AUGIB and peptic ulcer bleeding (PUB) in both periods was calculated using data from the population of this area according to the National Statistical Service.

RESULTS

A reduction in the incidence of AUGIB from 162.9/100,000 population in 1995, to 108.3/100,000 population (rate ratio=0.49, confidence interval 95%=0.37-0.63) in 2005 and in the incidence of PUB from 104.8/100,000 population to 72.5/100,000 (rate ratio=0.49, confidence interval 95%=0.35-0.68) were, respectively, observed. This reduction was mainly due to the reduction in the incidence of duodenal ulcer bleeding (from 66.7 cases/100,000 to 35.5/100,000 population), whereas gastric ulcer bleeding incidence remained unchanged (33.1/100,000 vs. 34.4/100,000 cases). Mean age of patients increased from 59.4+/-17.1 years to 66.1+/-16.1, P<0.0001, and the patients' comorbidity. The percentage of NSAIDs' use remained stable (49.3% vs. 48.2%), whereas the use of oral anticoagulants and antiplatelets drugs increased significantly (from 2.2% to 6.8%, P=0.001 and from 1.2% to 10.8%, P<0.0001, respectively). Blood transfusion requirements per patient significantly decreased (from 2.5+/-2 to 2+/-2.4, P=0.009). The rate of rebleeding in PUB patients and emergency surgical hemostasis statistically decreased (from 12% to 5.9%, P=0.02 and from 5.9% to 3.1%, P=0.009, respectively). No significant difference in the overall mortality was observed (3.9% in 1995 vs. 6.5% in 2005).

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of AUGIB during the past 10 years significantly decreased, mainly due to the decline in the incidence of bleeding duodenal ulcers. Nowadays, patients are older with more comorbidities, but mortality remains unchanged.

An assessment of endoscopic and concomitant management of acute variceal bleeding at a tertiary care centre

BACKGROUND

Several therapies have been demonstrated to be beneficial in the management of acute variceal bleeding (AVB). The aim of the present study was to characterize the use of these therapies at a Canadian tertiary care centre.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A comprehensive chart review was performed to assess the management of all adult cirrhotic patients with AVB who were admitted to a university-affiliated, tertiary care centre between April 2001 and March 2004.

RESULTS

A total of 81 AVB patients were identified with a mean age of 53.7+/-13.2 years and a median model for end-stage liver disease score of 14. Endoscopy was performed within 8.2+/-7.6 h of admission. Variceal banding was performed for 87% of patients with esophageal varices, which were the most common source of bleeding (80%). Octreotide was used in 82% of patients for a mean duration of 74.3+/-35.4 h; prophylactic antibiotics were used in 25% of patients and beta-blockers were used in 24% of patients without any contraindications. Follow-up endoscopy was arranged for 46 of 71 (65%) survivors. Prophylactic antibiotic use was associated with the presence of ascites, while beta-blockers were used more often in the last year of the study.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a disconnection between the use of evidence-based recommendations and routine clinical practices in the management of AVB. Deficiencies identified include the lack of use of prophylactic antibiotics and beta-blockers, variable use of octreotide and inadequate follow-up recommendations. There is a need to identify measures to improve the process of care for patients with AVB which would ensure optimal management of these patients.

Endoscopic variceal ligation vs. propranolol for prevention of first variceal bleeding: a randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVES

Data in the literature regarding the role of endoscopic variceal ligation for the prevention of first variceal bleeding in cirrhotic patients are controversial. To further explore this issue we have compared ligation and propranolol treatment in a prospective randomized study.

METHODS

Sixty patients with cirrhosis and oesophageal varices with no history but at high risk of bleeding were randomized to ligation treatment (30 patients) or propranolol (30 patients). Patients were followed for approximately 27.5 months.

RESULTS

Variceal obliteration was achieved in 28 patients (93.3%) after 3+/-1 sessions. The mean daily dose of propranolol was 60.3+/-13.3 mg. Two patients (6.7%) in the ligation group and nine patients (30%) in the propranolol group developed variceal bleeding (P = 0.043). The actuarial risks of variceal bleeding at 2 years were 6.7% and 25%, respectively. On multivariate analysis, propranolol treatment and grade III varices turned out to be predictive factors for the risk of variceal bleeding. Mortality was not different between the two groups. There were no serious complications due to ligation. Propranolol treatment was discontinued in four patients because of side effects.

CONCLUSIONS

Variceal ligation is a safe and more effective method than propranolol treatment for the prevention of first variceal bleeding in cirrhotic patients with high-risk varices.

Complications following transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt: a retrospective analysis

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) has been the therapeutic option for severe decompensation of chronic liver disease and as a bridge to liver transplantation. The aim of this study was to analyze the complications of this procedure. The records of 47 patients (39 men) of mean age 48 years underwent TIPS procedures from 1998 to 2003 were reviewed. Forty-one patients received 45 successful TIPS; it failed in six patients. Improvement was observed in 20 of 28 patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding (71%); 9 of 11 with ascites (82%); and 5 of 8 with impaired renal function (62%). The Child-Pugh scores improved in 6 of the 47 patients (13%). Transplantation was performed in 11 patients (23%). The complications were: encephalopathy (49%); infection (19%); renal failure (17%); TIPS migration to the portal vein (4%) and to the right atrium (4%). Mortality was 32% (15/47) over 3 months. Eight patients developed active bleeding during TIPS installation requiring mechanical ventilation and intensive care, and died within the first week. Other causes of death were sepsis (n = 2), liver failure (n = 1), accidental puncture of the Glisson's capsule leading to intra-abdominal bleeding (n = 1) and refractory upper gastrointestinal bleeding (n = 3). The latter four patients had TIPS placement failure. In conclusion, TIPS produced clinical improvement among 51% of patients with complications in 49%. The main complications were encephalopathy (49%), infection (19%), and renal failure (17%). The 3-month mortality rate after TIPS placement was 32%.

Cost-effectiveness of hepatic venous pressure gradient measurements for prophylaxis of variceal re-bleeding

BACKGROUND

Measurement of the hepatic venous pressure gradient may identify a sub-optimal response to drug prophylaxis in patients with a history of variceal bleeding. However, the cost-effectiveness of routine hepatic venous pressure gradient measurements to guide secondary prophylaxis has not been examined.

METHODS

A Markov model was constructed using specialized software (DATA 3.5, Williamstown, MA, USA). Three strategies involved secondary prophylaxis without haemodynamic monitoring using beta-blockers alone, beta-blockers plus isosorbide mononitrate or endoscopic variceal ligation alone. Four strategies involved secondary prophylaxis with beta-blockers plus isosorbide mononitrate or beta-blockers alone, accompanied by one or two hepatic venous pressure gradient measurements to identify haemodynamic non-responders, who underwent endoscopic variceal ligation as an alternative. The total expected costs, variceal bleeding episodes and total deaths were calculated for each strategy over 3 years.

RESULTS

The two most effective strategies were combination therapy alone and combination therapy with two hepatic venous pressure gradient measurements. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of the latter strategy was 136,700 dollars per year of life saved compared with combination therapy alone. The ratio improved as the time horizon was extended or the rates of variceal re-bleeding were increased.

CONCLUSIONS

The cost-effectiveness of haemodynamic monitoring to guide secondary prophylaxis of recurrent variceal bleeding is highly dependent on local hepatic venous pressure gradient measurement costs, life expectancy and re-bleeding rates.

Improved patient survival after acute variceal bleeding: a multicenter, cohort study

OBJECTIVE

Existing literature indicates that the mortality rate with each variceal bleeding episode is 30-50%. Over the past 2 decades, there have been significant developments in the management of variceal bleeding. The effect of these developments on the natural history of variceal bleeding is unclear. Therefore, a retrospective, multicenter study was conducted to define the outcomes of variceal bleeding and to describe the patterns of current practice in the management of variceal bleeding.

METHODS

All patients with documented variceal bleeding hospitalized at four large county hospitals from January 1, 1997, to June 30, 2000, were included. Study outcomes were in-hospital, 6-wk, and overall mortality, rate of rebleeding, transfusion requirement, and length of stay. After discharge, patients were followed until death or study closure date, on June 30, 2000.

RESULTS

A total of 231 subjects were included, and their in-hospital, 6-wk, and overall mortality rates were 14.2%, 17.5%, and 33.5%, respectively. The frequency of rebleeding during follow-up was 29%. Median length of total hospital stay was 8 days (0-34 days). Median number of packed red cell units transfused was 4 U (0-60 U). Upper endoscopy was performed in 95% of patients within 24 h, and endoscopic therapy was done in all but eight patients (ligation 64%, sclerotherapy 33%). Octreotide was administered in 74% of the patients. Portasystemic shunts were performed in 7.5% of the patients for controlling acute variceal bleeding.

CONCLUSIONS

The mortality rate after variceal bleeding in this study was substantially lower than previously reported. This suggests that advances made in the management of variceal bleeding have improved outcomes after variceal bleeding.

Primary prophylaxis of variceal hemorrhage

Figure 3 shows an algorithm for the primary prevention of variceal hemorrhage. Pharmacologic therapy is the current standard of treatment for the primary prophylaxis of esophageal variceal bleeding. Patients with medium or large varices should be treated with a nonselective beta-blocker with the dose titrated to achieve a 25% decrement in resting heart rate or a heart rate of 55 to 60 bpm. The development of symptoms will, of course, limit the dose used. As discussed previously, these therapeutic endpoints are not well correlated with decreases in portal pressure. Measurement of the HVPG before therapy and after 3 months of therapy provides a rational approach to drug dosing. If the HVPG decreases by 20% or to less than 12 mm Hg, the medication dose will be effective in preventing hemorrhage. If, however, the HVPG is not appropriately lowered, a long-acting nitrate may be added. Patients with small varices should be observed, with endoscopic examinations every 2 years to assess progression of variceal size. Endoscopic therapy is not indicated for the primary prevention of variceal bleeding.

The use of screening and preventive therapies for gastroesophageal varices in patients referred for evaluation of orthotopic liver transplantation

OBJECTIVE

Screening for varices has been recommended in patients with cirrhosis to prevent variceal hemorrhage (primary prophylaxis). In addition, therapy is recommended after the initial episode of variceal bleeding to prevent recurrence (secondary prophylaxis). However, the degree of adherence to these recommendations remains unclear. The purpose of our study was to determine whether these recommendations are being followed in patients presenting for evaluation of orthotopic liver transplantation.

METHODS

One hundred twenty-five patients referred for liver transplantation were evaluated. Data regarding demographics, clinical information, relevant time intervals (diagnosis of cirrhosis to screening, screening to initial variceal bleeding, variceal bleeding to referral, diagnosis of cirrhosis to referral), screening strategies used, and implementation of primary or secondary prophylaxis was obtained. The differences among quantitative variables were analyzed with Student's t test. Qualitative variables were evaluated with the Mantel-Haenzel chi2 test or Fisher's exact test. Statistical significance was designated at p < 0.05.

RESULTS

Our study found that 46% of patients presenting for evaluation of liver transplantation had screening endoscopy or radiological studies to detect the presence of varices. On the contrary, secondary prophylaxis was performed in all patients with a prior history of variceal hemorrhage. Screening for varices displayed no regional differences.

CONCLUSIONS

In our cohort, screening for varices is not being consistently performed, thus delaying the timely implementation of primary prophylaxis. Therefore, the adherence to currently available practice guidelines and the education of physicians to implement screening in this patient population is an important goal.

Prevention in liver disease

Prevention has become an important component of medical therapy for a variety of diseases. Preventive strategies in liver disease are relatively underdeveloped and have focused mainly on specific complications of chronic liver disease and vaccination for viral hepatitis. Although public health initiatives designed to prevent certain forms of liver disease are in place, they seem to be underutilized and their utility has not been evaluated. The development of a comprehensive approach using public health initiatives in conjunction with strategies by health care providers is important because of the potential for decreasing the human and health care costs associated with hepatic dysfunction. This article reviews the available literature regarding prevention for health care providers, includes a summary of ongoing public health initiatives, and suggests an approach to prevention in liver disease. It is intended to raise awareness and encourage implementation of preventive strategies in hepatology.

Pharmacologic therapy for portal hypertension

Pharmacologic therapy for portal hypertension is effective in the treatment and prevention of hemorrhage from esophagogastric varices. Acute hemorrhage from varices can be treated with intravenous agents such as somatostatin or terlipressin, either alone or in combination with endoscopic sclerotherapy or band ligation. Intravenous octreotide has not shown effectiveness as monotherapy, but it appears to be beneficial when combined with endoscopic treatment. The prevention of rebleeding after initial hemorrhage is best accomplished with non-selective beta blockers, endoscopic band ligation of varices, or a combination of endoscopic and pharmacologic therapies. The addition of oral nitrates may further decrease rebleeding rates, but more data from randomized trials are needed. Beta blockers are currently the only agents recommended for the primary prevention of variceal hemorrhage.

[TIPS - Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt. A review]

At the present time several therapeutic options are used for the treatment of bleeding esophageal varices in patients with portal hypertension. We will review the main medical publications on transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS), a procedure seldom used among us. TIPS works as a portocaval side-to-side shunt and decreases the risk of esophageal bleeding through lowering of the portal system pressure and a decrease of the portal hepatic pressure gradient. TIPS consists in the percutaneous insertion, through the internal jugular vein, of a metallic stent under fluoroscopic control in the hepatic parenchyma creating a true porta caval communication. There are several studies demonstrating the efficacy of TIPS, although only a few of them are randomized and control-matched to allow us to conclude that this procedure is safe, efficient and with a good cost benefit ratio. In this review, we search for the analysis of the TIPS utilization, its techniques, its major indications and complications. TIPS has been used in cases of gastroesophageal bleeding that has failed with pharmacologic or endoscopic treatment in patients Child-Pugh B and C. It can be used also as a bridge for liver transplantation. Others indications for TIPS are uncontrolled ascites, hepatic renal syndrome, and hepatic hydrothorax. The main early complications of TIPS using are related to the insertion site and hepatic encephalopathy and the stent occlusion is the chief late complication.

Management of portal hypertension-related bleeding

Although endoscopic sclerotherapy and TIPS remain the primary therapeutic tools in management of acute variceal bleeding, surgical shunts must be considered for low-risk patients with bleeding. OLTx is the only definitive treatment for patients with end-stage liver disease and vascular decompensation. Furthermore, the current prospective multicenter randomized study, funded by the National Institutes of Health and Human Services, will help determine the role of DSRS versus TIPS in cirrhotic patients with good hepatic reserve. This is a necessity in a time in which organ shortages are ever-increasing because of a growing disparity between the number of patients listed for transplantation each year versus the number of suitable organ donors. The various surgical techniques should be applied in different situations based on patients' clinical status at the time of the bleed and whether they are considered candidates for liver transplantation.