Hepatocellular carcinoma: a prime indication for living donor liver transplantation

Survival benefit of living donor liver transplant for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma

With the increasing incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in both the United States and globally, the role of liver transplantation in management continues to be an area of active conversation as it is often considered the gold standard in the treatment of HCC. The use of living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) and the indications in the setting of malignancy, both generally and in HCC specifically, are frequently debated. In terms of both overall survival and recurrence-free survival, LDLT is at least equivalent to DDLT, especially when performed for disease within Milan criteria. Emerging and compelling evidence suggests that LDLT is superior to DDLT in treating HCC as there is a significant decrease in waitlist mortality. As the oncologic indications for liver transplantation continue to expand and the gap between organ demand and organ availability continues to worsen, high volumes centers should consider using LDLT to shrink the ever-expanding waitlist.

Living Liver Donors: A Coordinator's Perspective

Living donor liver transplantation is an acceptable alternative for many patients awaiting a liver transplant. The benefits of living donor liver transplantation to the recipient are many; however, there is also an appreciable risk to the donor. Many people, including healthcare professionals, believe that living donor liver transplantation is not ethically justified because any risk to a donor outweighs the benefit to the recipient. Recent studies show adverse events in this population do not include only medical complications; any complication—medical, social, psychological, financial, or other—must be examined to analyze the true incidence of adverse outcomes in living liver donors.

Smaller grafts do not imply early recurrence in recipients transplanted for hepatocellular carcinoma: A Chinese experience

Liver graft size has long been a critical issue in adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). We analyzed China Liver Transplant Registry data (January 2007-December 2009), identifying 295 patients who underwent LDLT for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The recipients were divided into two groups: A, graft-to-recipient body weight ratio (GRWR) ≤ 0.8% (n = 56); B, GRWR > 0.8% (n = 239). We evaluated donor, recipient, and operative factors and analyzed survival outcome and the risk factors affecting overall and recurrence survival. As a result, the overall survival rates of group B were significantly higher than that of group A (p = 0.009); the corresponding tumor-free survival rates did not differ significantly (p = 0.133). The overall survival rates among the 151 recipients who met the Hangzhou criteria did not differ significantly (p = 0.953), nor did the corresponding tumor-free survival rates (p = 0.893). Multivariate analysis determined that GRWR was a significant risk factor for poor survival but not for early recurrence. In conclusion, small grafts may predict poorer survival outcome but do not indicate earlier HCC recurrence in recipients transplanted for HCC, and survival outcome with smaller grafts is merely acceptable in selected recipients.

Liver transplantation and expanded Milan criteria: does it really work?

CONTEXT

Orthotopic liver transplantation is an excellent treatment approach for hepatocellular carcinoma in well-selected candidates. Nowadays some institutions tend to Expand the Milan Criteria including tumor with more than 5 cm and also associate with multiple tumors none larger than 3 cm in order to benefit more patients with the orthotopic liver transplantation.

METHODS

The data collected were based on the online database PubMED. The key words applied on the search were "expanded Milan criteria" limited to the period from 2000 to 2009. We excluded 19 papers due to: irrelevance of the subject, lack of information and incompatibility of the language (English only). We compiled patient survival and tumor recurrence free rate from 1 to 5-years in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma submitted to orthotopic liver transplantation according to expanded the Milan criteria from different centers.

RESULTS

Review compiled data from 23 articles. Fourteen different criteria were found and they are also described in detail, however the University of California - San Francisco was the most studied one among them.

CONCLUSION

Expanded the Milan criteria is a useful attempt for widening the preexistent protocol for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma in waiting-list for orthotopic liver transplantation. However there is no significant difference in patient survival rate and tumor recurrence free rate from those patients that followed the Milan criteria.

Living donor liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Liver transplantation is a widely accepted modality in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). In our center, patients with HCC limited to the liver without macrovascular invasion are accepted as candidates for living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). The aim of this study was to describe the patient characteristics and outcomes at a single institution to analyze the impact of our criteria on the survival of HCC patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We reviewed the medical records of all HCC (n = 105) patients who underwent liver transplantation in our institution. We excluded deaths in the early postoperative period and deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT) patients, leaving 74 subjects (65 males and 9 female). Their median age was 53 years (range, 19-69). Univariate Kaplan-Meier and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were used to analyze overall and disease-free survivals.

RESULTS

Thirty-two (43%) patients were within the Milan criteria, and 42 (57%) exceeded them. One- and 2-year overall survival rates for patients within versus exceeding the Milan criteria were 72% versus 68% and 61% versus 58%, respectively. One- and 2-year disease-free survival rates for patients within versus exceeding the Milan criteria were 72% versus 68% and 60% versus 55%, respectively (P > .05). Tumor recurrence rates for patients within versus exceeding the Milan criteria were 0% versus 36%, respectively (P = .0002). Alpha-fetoprotein level was the only predictor of overall survival; alpha-fetoprotein level and tumor differentiation were predictors of disease-free survival.

CONCLUSION

Although higher recurrence rates have been observed among patients exceeding the Milan criteria, LDLT is the only treatment option for the patients in countries with limited sources of cadaveric organs. As a general principle, we believe that the use of cadaveric donor liver grafts is not suitable for patients who exceed these criteria.

University of California at San Francisco criteria can be applied to living donor liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: single-center preliminary results in 27 patients

BACKGROUND

Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) can provide life-saving therapy for many patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), who otherwise would succumb due to tumor progression. However, donor risk must be balanced against potential recipient benefit.

METHODS

From January 2002 to December 2006, a total of 27 LDLT were performed for HCC patients in our center, including 25 right lobe grafts, and 2 dual grafts. Twenty-four (88.89%) met the University of California at San Francisco (UCSF) criteria, whereas 3 (11.11%) did not.

RESULTS

Of our 29 donors, the overall complication rate was 17.24%. Two (6.90%) experienced major complications including intra-abdominal bleeding and portal vein thrombosis in 1, respectively; 3 (10.34%) experienced minor complications: wound steatosis, pleural effusion, and transient chyle leakage in 1, respectively. We did not observe any donor mortality; all donors fully recovered and returned to their previous occupations. No recipient developed small-for-size syndrome. The overall HCC patient survival rates at 1- and 3-years were 84.01% and 71.40%, respectively, similar to those of patients undergoing LDLT for various nonmalignant diseases during the same period (P > .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Although further study is needed to fully assess the risks and benefits of LDLT for both HCC patients and donors, our preliminary results suggested that LDLT offered an acceptable chance and duration of survival for HCC patients. It was not only a relatively safe procedure provided that every effort was taken to minimize donor morbidities, but also beneficial for HCC recipients.

Fractional allelic imbalance could allow for the development of an equitable transplant selection policy for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma

Liver transplantation (LT) in the presence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains a controversial issue because the current staging systems are not sufficiently predictive of outcomes. Paraffin blocks from 183 patients that underwent LT in the presence of HCC were collected. Molecular analysis was carried out blindly on the native liver specimens in all cases with respect to recurrence outcomes. The fractional allelic imbalance (FAI) rate index was determined in each case and was used to compare the acquired mutational load between different tumors. The FAI was determined from the microdissected tissue site displaying the greatest amount of acquired allelic loss. FAI was found to be the strongest predictor of recurrence followed by vascular invasion and then by tumor number or hepatic lobar involvement. Based on these findings, 3 prognostic models were constructed for selection of candidates for LT in patients with concomitant HCC. Molecular markers of tumor progression are the strongest predictors of HCC recurrence currently available, surpassing all components of the tumor-node-metastasis classification system for staging of malignant tumors (TNM), including vascular invasion. Incorporation of these molecular markers of tumor progression could help resolve the ongoing conundrum of organ allocation for patients with HCC.

Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma in Asia

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a leading cause of cancer death, particularly in Asia where the major etiology, chronic hepatitis B virus infection, is endemic. The tumor frequently develops in a background of cirrhosis, and liver transplantation offers a chance to cure both the tumor and the underlying cirrhosis. The Milan criteria based on tumor size and number as an estimate of tumor burden are conventionally the gold standard in determining eligibility for transplantation, and the outcome is excellent. The shortage of organs from deceased donors has curtailed the adoption of extended criteria and led to the problems of long waiting times and dropouts. Several measures have been taken to tackle these issues, including prioritization of patients with HCC, use of pretransplant adjuvant treatment to prevent tumor progression, and living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). With a high incidence of HCC and a low organ donation rate, Asia has developed a distinctive pattern of indication and strategy in the application of liver transplantation. Over the last decade, the number of liver transplants in Asia has increased rapidly, by 10-fold, largely as a result of the development of LDLT. The proportion of patients who undergo liver transplantation for HCC is increasing and HCC comprises one third of the indication for liver transplantation in Asia. LDLT is the dominant strategy, accounting for 96% of the liver transplants for HCC. Many transplant programs accept patients beyond the Milan criteria, and the reported 3-year survival rate is about 60%. With the promotion of organ donation, better quantification of the benefit of LDLT for extended indications, and identification of predictors for survival, the practice of liver transplantation for HCC in Asia will continue to evolve.

Living donor liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: a single-center experience in Taiwan

BACKGROUND

Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) demonstrates certain survival benefits over deceased donor liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) but there is no consensus on criteria for the use of LDLT for HCC for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) taking into account strategies to improve survival.

METHODS

Thirty-five patients (89% men) underwent LDLT for HCC. The mean age was 51 years (range, 22-61). The median disease severity scores were B, 11-20, and 2B for Child-Turcotte-Pugh, Model for End-stage Liver Disease, and United Network for Organ Sharing, respectively. The transplant records were retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

All were within Milan criteria at time of transplantation. A novel approach to downstaging tumors initially beyond the Milan criteria was evaluated using transarterial embolization or percutaneous ethanol injection. Our initial results were encouraging as recipients whose tumors had been downstaged had not had recurrence to date. Seven (20%) patients underwent hepatectomy for HCC before undergoing transplant. The overall mean posttransplant follow-up in this series was 40.3 months (range, 23-75). The overall posttransplant complication rate requiring intervention was 11%. There was only one malignancy recurrence for an overall recurrence rate of 3%. Vascular invasion and small- for-size transplants did not seem to influence tumor recurrence. The nonestimated recipient 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year survivals were 98%, 96%, and 90%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

This review emphasizes the need for early disease recognition and prompt intervention when Milan criteria are met to improve survival from HCC after LDLT.

Management of hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma is the fifth most common cancer in the world and is the third cause of cancer-related death with varying prevalence according to endemic risk factors. Despite therapeutic advances, there has not been significant improvement in the overall survival of patients who have hepatocellular cancer in the last 2 decades. Treatment selection should be based on tumor characteristics and the underlying liver disease.

Expanded criteria for liver transplantation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a report from the International Registry of Hepatic Tumors in Liver Transplantation

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a common indication for liver transplantation (LT). Currently, deceased donor LT is approved by the United Network for Organ Sharing for patients with HCC who meet the Milan criteria of a single tumor up to 5 cm or up to 3 tumors up to 3 cm as determined by imaging studies. We analyzed data in the International Registry of Hepatic Tumors in Liver Transplantation from 1,206 patients with HCC. Tumor size and number were determined by gross pathologic examination. Kaplan-Meier recurrence-free survival in patients with a single tumor < or =5 cm or 2-3 lesions all < or =3 cm in diameter was 84.7% at 1 year and 61.8% at 5 years. Overall, patients whose tumor or tumors exceeded these limits had worse survival (67.2% at 1 year and 42.8% at 5 years, P < 0.001); however, not all patients in this group did poorly. Patients with 2-4 tumors < or =5 cm or single lesions < or =6 cm had recurrence-free survival equivalent to patients with a single tumor of 3.1-5.0 cm or 2-3 lesions all < or =3 cm in diameter. These data suggest that current criteria for selecting tumor patients for LT may be too restrictive and could be expanded.

Primary hepatocellular cancer in the explanted liver: outcome of transplantation and risk factors for HCC recurrence

AIM

To evaluate the risk of recurrence of hepatocellular cancer (HCC) after liver transplantation (LT).

METHODS

The clinical records of 104 patients with HCC in the explanted liver were examined.

RESULTS

HCC recurrence occurred in 12 patients. Recurrence was observed in all patients with a single nodule greater than 5 cm. Among the 5 patients with more than 3 tumours with a maximum diameter of 4.5 cm, no recurrence occurred. The survival rates were 81% and 64% at 1 and 5 years, respectively; the recurrence-free survival at 1 and 5 years was, respectively, 93% and 82%. Pre-LT alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) increased at a greater magnitude in patients who experienced recurrence, compared to those who did not. Tumour diameter, differentiation, satellitosis, AFP and the magnitude of AFP increase were predictive of recurrence. The 1- and 5-year recurrence-free survival for the 68 patients who had a single nodule up to 5 cm, or up to 3 nodules all less than 4.5 cm and with a maximum cumulative diameter of 8 cm, or more than 3 nodules all less than 2.5 cm, were 95% and 92%, respectively. For the 13 patients not meeting these criteria, the 1- and 5-year recurrence-free survival was, respectively, 75% and 54% (log Rank test p=0.019).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with more than 3 small HCC nodules before LT could still have a good outcome without recurrence. A rapid increase in AFP could be useful in identifying patients with a greater risk of post-LT HCC recurrence.

Optimal Initial Treatment for Early Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Patients with Preserved Liver Function: Transplantation or Resection?

Partial hepatic resection has been the mainstay of curative treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in cirrhotic patients with preserved liver function. Liver transplantation for HCC was initially developed as a treatment option for patients with unresectable tumors associated with Child B or C cirrhosis. However, in recent years, some authors have advocated liver transplantation even for resectable early HCC associated with Child A cirrhosis. Whether transplantation or liver resection is the optimal initial treatment for early HCC in compensated cirrhosis depends on the survival results and also the availability of liver grafts. Recent studies comparing liver resection and transplantation for early HCC in Child A cirrhotic patients demonstrated similar long-term survival. While liver transplantation is associated with a lower tumor recurrence rate, this benefit is counteracted by long-term complications such as immunosuppression related infections and neoplasms. Patients put on transplantation waiting list run a significant risk of tumor progression and dropout, while liver resection is immediately applicable to all. A premature liver transplantation may expose patients to the side effects of immunosuppression earlier than necessary. With the current shortage of liver grafts, advocating primary liver transplantation for patients with early HCC associated with compensated cirrhosis will increase waiting time of transplantation and further increases the chance of dropout. Resection first and salvage transplantation for recurrent tumors or liver failure has been shown to be a feasible strategy in the majority of patients, and this appears to be the optimal strategy with the best use of organs.

Liver Transplantation with ???Rescue Organ Offers??? Within the Eurotransplant Area: A 2-year Report From the University Hospital Essen

Liver transplantation (LTx) is the only treatment for patients with end-stage liver failure. This report focuses on 45 deceased donor liver allografts allocated through Eurotransplant as "rescue offers," which were accepted and subsequently transplanted at our center over a two-year period. These organs had been officially offered to and rejected by other transplant centers a total of 162 times prior to our acceptance. Primary nonfunction was observed in six patients. Two of them died and four were retransplanted. Overall patient survival was 84.4%. LTx with such "rescue organs" constitutes an additional transplant option and a safe mechanism to "rescue" organs within Eurotransplant.

Live donor liver transplantation

With ever-increasing demand for liver replacement, supply of organs is the limiting factor and a significant number of patients die while waiting. Live donor liver transplantation has emerged as an important option for many patients, particularly small pediatric patients and those adults that are disadvantaged by the current deceased donor allocation system. Ideally there would be no need to subject perfectly healthy people in the prime of their lives to a potentially life-threatening operation to procure transplantable organs. Donor safety is imperative and cannot be compromised regardless of the implication for the intended recipient. The evolution of split liver transplantation is the basis upon which live donor transplantation has become possible. The live donor procedures are considerably more complex than whole organ decreased donor transplantation and there are unique considerations involved in the assessment of any specific recipient and donor. Donor selection and evaluation have become highly specialized. The critical issue of size matching is determined by both the actual size of the donor graft and the recipient as well as the degree of recipient portal hypertension. The outcomes after live donor liver transplantation have been at least comparable to those of deceased donor transplantation. Nevertheless, all efforts should be made to improve deceased donor donation so as to minimize the need for live donors. Transplant physicians, particularly surgeons, must take responsibility for regulating and overseeing these procedures.

Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhosis within the Eurotransplant area: an additional option with "livers that nobody wants"

BACKGROUND

Liver transplantation is recognized as the treatment of choice for small hepatocellular carcinomas (HCC) in patients with end-stage liver failure. However, because of limited organ availability, not all those who qualify can benefit from it.

METHODS

Over a 3-year period, we accepted and subsequently transplanted 10 deceased donor liver allografts allocated through Eurotransplant. These organs had been officially offered to and rejected by other transplant centers a total of 40 times due to medical or logistical reasons prior to our acceptance. They were implanted into patients in the waiting list with HCC and cirrhosis. Recipients without HCC transplanted with such "undesirable" grafts were not included in this study.

RESULTS

Two patients had initial poor graft function but subsequently recovered. There was one arterial complication requiring reintervention. Median intensive care unit and hospital stays were 6 and 28 days respectively. One patient developed renal insufficiency, but recovered after 3 months. One patient developed HCC recurrence in the allograft and underwent a successful atypical liver resection 23 months after transplantation. All patients are currently alive, with follow-up periods ranging from 5 to 36 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Liver transplantation with such "livers that nobody wants" constitutes an additional option for patients with HCC and cirrhosis. The risk-benefit ratio in these instances should be evaluated on a case-by-case basis.

Living donor liver transplantation

The introduction of living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) has been one of the most remarkable steps in the field of liver transplantation (LT). First introduced for children in 1989, its adoption for adults has followed only 10 years later. As the demand for LT continues to increase, LDLT provides life-saving therapy for many patients who would otherwise die awaiting a cadaveric organ. In recent years, LDLT has been shown to be a clinically safe addition to deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT) and has been able to significantly extend the scarce donor pool. As long as the donor shortage continues to increase, LDLT will play an important role in the future of LT.

Selection of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma for liver transplantation

Background

Orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) plays a pivotal role in the management of selected patients with initial hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). After disappointing early results and a shortage of cadaveric grafts, patients are currently selected for OLT on the basis of tumour size and number. Limitations of these criteria and the advent of living donation have prompted their re-evaluation. The principal aims of this review were to define the limitations of current transplant criteria for HCC, and to identify potential areas for improvement.

Methods

A Medline search using the terms ‘liver transplantation’ and ‘hepatocellular carcinoma’ was conducted. Additional references were sourced from key articles.

Results and conclusion

In patients with HCC, biological properties of the tumour are more accurate than radiological criteria in determining outcome after transplantation. Despite the risks of tumour biopsy, which may have been previously overstated, histological evaluation before transplantation may have a role and warrants further study. By expanding the donor pool and eliminating waiting times, live donor liver transplantation is a valuable resource that has yet to fulfil its potential because of unresolved ethical issues concerning the safety of the donor. The availability of long-term outcome data may help to clarify this in the near future.

Is transarterial chemoembolization necessary before liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma?

BACKGROUND

Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) before liver transplantation (LT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has been proposed to prevent tumor progression, thus decreasing tumor recurrence and increasing survival.

METHODS

We studied 46 patients undergoing LT for HCC who were divided in 2 groups--group A with pretransplant TACE (18 patients [39.1%]) and group B without pretransplant TACE (28 patients [60.9%])--and compared postoperative and long-term results between the 2 groups.

RESULTS

There were no statistical differences in morbidity, transfusion needles, and postoperative time between-and no acute arterial or portal complication in-the 2 groups. There were no statistical differences in tumor recurrence (16.7 % vs 36.4 %, P=.16) with regard to pathway (mainly extrahepatic) or time. In group A patients, mean survival was 89.3+/-21.7 months with 1-, 3-, and 5-year actuarial survival rates of 83.3%, 60.5%, and 60.5%, respectively. In group B patients, mean survival was 75.1+/-19.1 months with 1-, 3-, and 5-year actuarial survival rates of 77.2%, 58.7%, and 38.1%, respectively. The differences in mean survival were not statistically significant (PX .56), nor was 5-year disease-free survival, which was 54% in group A and 39.5% in group B (P=.8).

CONCLUSIONS

TACE is a safe procedure for candidates on the wait list who are scheduled for LT to treat HCC. Although TACE does not correlate with increased intraoperative difficulties or postoperative complications, it does not significantly improve tumor recurrence and survival.

Living Related Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Egypt

BACKGROUND

Living related liver transplantation (LRLT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in cirrhotic patients has emerged as a rewarding therapy for a cure. Extensions of the Milan criteria have been proposed with encouraging results.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From October 2001 to June 2004, 47 adult patients with end-stage liver disease (ESLD) have been treated using LRLT, including 11 (9 males and 2 females) with HCC superimposed on hepatitis C virus (HCV)-related (n = 10) or hepatitis B virus-related (n = 1) cirrhosis. Their mean age was 50 years (range, 40-61). HCC was confirmed preoperatively in 9 subjects whereas it was an incidental finding in 2 cases. Alpha fetoprotein (AFP) levels were elevated in 5 of them. Radiologically, tumor number and sizes ranged from 1 to 2 nodules and from 1.5 to 7 cm, respectively. Five of the 11 subjects underwent pretransplantation tumor control therapy.

RESULTS

Nine patients are alive, all of them being disease free during follow-up periods ranging from 6 to 30 months. Two subjects died: one of HCC recurrence at 1 year posttransplantation, and another of a pulmonary embolism on day 7. AFP levels decreased to normal values in 4 cases. Excluding the 2 incidental tumors, pathological examination of the explants revealed a higher number and larger size of the nodules in 3 and 5 cases, respectively. Microvascular invasion was documented in 3 explants, 1 of which experienced HCC recurrence and the other 2 received 6 cycles of Doxorubicin following normalization of their liver profile. Postoperative complications included the following: recurrent HCC (n = 1), recurrent HCV (n = 2), acute cellular rejection (n = 3), anastomotic biliary stricture (n = 1), and subphrenic collection (n = 1).

CONCLUSION

Our current data confirm the efficacy of LRLT for treatment of HCC superimposed on liver cirrhosis.

Liver transplantation for malignancy

Liver transplantation for hepatic malignancies has emerged from an exotic and desperate approach to a well-documented and proven treatment modality for these unfortunate patients. However, early unsatisfactory results emphasized that only a highly selected patient population would benefit from transplantation. Currently, <10% of all liver transplants performed are for hepatocellular cancer (HCC). There is no controversy that hepatoblastoma is an excellent indication in pediatric patients with unresectable tumors. Similarly, liver transplantation for HCC in the adult population yields good results for patients whose tumor masses do not exceed the Milan criteria. It remains to be determined whether patients with more extensive tumors can be reliably selected to benefit from the procedure. Adjunctive procedures like radiofrequency ablation, chemoembolization, or cryotherapy might be indicated to limit tumor progression for patients on waiting lists. Epitheloid hemangioendothelioma is also an appropriate indication for liver transplantation, unlike angiosarcoma. Metastatic liver disease is not an indication for liver transplantation, with the exception of cases in which the primary is a neuroendocrine tumor, for which liver transplantation can result in long-term survival and even cure in a number of patients. And finally, while gallbladder cancers are never an indication for liver transplantation, rare cases of cholangiocellular cancer might qualify if aggressive combination therapies, including chemotherapy and radiotherapy followed by OLT, are carried through. Survival in these selected patients can approach that for patients with cholestatic liver disease.

Surgical therapy of hepatocellular carcinoma

There is no worldwide consensus of an algorithm for the radical treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Surgical resection, liver transplantation and, recently, local ablation therapies achieve high curative rates in selected patients. However, recurrence of HCC remains a major problem. This review provides an overview of the current surgical treatment options available for patients with HCC.

The impact of pre-operative loco-regional therapy on outcome after liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma

No prior studies have shown that pre-operative loco-regional therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) improves survival following orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). We performed subgroup analyses according to pathologic HCC stage among 168 patients who underwent OLT to test the hypothesis that pre-operative loco-regional therapy confers a survival advantage in a subgroup at intermediate risk for HCC recurrence. Patients with pathologic T3 HCC meeting the proposed UCSF expanded criteria (single lesion not exceeding 6.5 cm or two to three lesions none > 4.5 cm with total tumor diameter within 8 cm) had a similar 5-year recurrence-free survival as patients with pathologic T2 HCC (88.5% vs. 93.8%; p = 0.56). In the subgroup with pathologic T2 or T3 HCC, the 5-year recurrence-free survival was 93.8% for the 85 patients who received pre-operative loco-regional therapy, versus 80.6% for the other 41 patients without treatment (p = 0.049). The treatment benefit, according to 5-year recurrence-free survival, appeared greater for pathologic T3 (85.9% vs. 51.4%; p = 0.05) than T2 HCC (96.4% versus 87.1%; p = 0.12). In conclusion, although the lack of a randomized controlled design precludes drawing firm conclusions, our results suggest that pre-operative loco-regional therapy may confer a survival benefit after OLT in the subgroup with pathologic T2 and T3 HCC.

Living donor liver transplant for malignancy

Adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation (ALDLT) is being increasingly utilized to treat patients with locally advanced hepatocellular carcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma who are not prioritized under the MELD allocation system. A single institution retrospective chart review examined ALDLTs performed for malignancy to identify indications, complications, and transplant outcome. Since 1997, 18 ALDLTs have been performed for malignancy as the primary indication. Thirteen patients were transplanted for HCC. The median survival following transplant was 18.6 months and four patients developed recurrent HCC. Five patients were transplanted for cholangiocarcinoma, with a 100% recurrence free survival at a mean follow up of 18 months among patients given neo-adjuvant chemoradiation. ALDLT can be safely performed for malignancy with an acceptable peri-operative mortality rate. However, HCC patients with large tumors experience a high rate of recurrence. The use of ALDLT for cholangiocarcinoma appears promising specifically in the context of neo-adjuvant therapy.

Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhosis: is clinical tumor classification before transplantation realistic?

BACKGROUND

The decision of whether to proceed with transplantation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in cirrhosis is based on clinical and imaging findings. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the accuracy of the current system.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We evaluated data of 70 patients with HCC who underwent liver transplantation (LTx) at our center. We specifically analyzed the correlation between preoperative imaging studies and postoperative anatomopathologic findings. Tumor-node-metastasis, Milan, and University of California San Francisco (UCSF) classifications were used. Patients were divided in 2 groups: (1) Patients undergoing live-donor LTx (LDLTx, n=35) and (2) patients undergoing cadaveric LTx (CLTx, n=35).

RESULTS

Only 10 (14.3%) of the 70 patients considered had tumor diameter that was correctly identified by pretransplant radiologic examinations. Twenty-four (34.2%) patients had correct identification of the number of tumors present. Fifty (71.4%) patients had incorrect measurements of tumor diameter of more than 1 cm. Sensitivity of radiologic imaging was especially poor for tumors between 1 and 2 cm and less than 1 cm (21% and 0%, respectively). Best accuracy of 60% was found for both the Milan and UCSF criteria. No significant difference was found between the two patient groups concerning the accuracy of the various systems/criteria of classification.

CONCLUSIONS

Current imaging techniques have a high incidence of false-negative and false-positive results when evaluating HCC in cirrhosis. A critical appraisal of patient characteristics together with great caution when interpreting imaging studies is recommended to determine candidacy for transplantation.

Differences in Attitude Toward Living and Postmortal Liver Donation in the United States, Germany, and Japan

Living liver donation is a possible immediate option for decreasing the shortage of liver allografts worldwide. Risks related to the donation make this procedure ethically controversial. Study groups of medical students (N= 330) from three different nations were analyzed with a complex questionnaire, and data were subjected to multiparameter analysis. The readiness for living liver donation was dependent upon the cultural background of the study groups. It was higher in the U.S. than in Germany and Japan, with a higher donation readiness for children as recipients than adults. Major differences among distinct sociodemographic groups need to be carefully addressed when setting up consensus guidelines for the clinical practice of living donation.

Hepatocellular carcinoma: current surgical management

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fifth most common malignancy in the world, responsible for 500,000 deaths globally every year. Although HCC is a slow-growing tumor, it is often rapidly fatal because it is usually not discovered until the disease is advanced. HCC occurs primarily in individuals with cirrhosis, a condition that increases the risk of performing potentially curative surgical therapy. Over the last 2 decades, however, the safety of surgical resections has greatly improved because of advances in radiologic assessment, patient selection, and perioperative care. As such, the operative mortality rate for hepatectomy has decreased from the 10%-20% level seen in the 1980s to less than 5% today. The ultimate goal of treatment of HCC is to prolong the quality of life by eradicating the malignancy while preserving hepatic function. For treatment with a curative intent, the gold standard remains surgical resection, by either partial hepatectomy or total hepatectomy followed by liver transplantation. Resectability and choice of procedure depend on many factors, including baseline liver function, absence of extrahepatic metastases, size of residual liver, availability of resources including liver graft, and expertise of the surgical team. Patients without cirrhosis can tolerate extensive resections, and partial hepatectomy should be considered first. For Child class B and C patients with a small HCC, liver transplantation offers the best results, whereas partial liver resection is indicated in patients with well-compensated cirrhosis. Living donor liver transplantation should be considered using the same criteria as that used for cadaveric transplantation.

Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma

Because hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) arises in cirrhotic livers and is often multifocal, transplantation seems to be a rational approach. Early results were poor, but current restrictive selection criteria can yield excellent results. Patients with 1 HCC nodule </=5 cm in diameter, or 2-3 nodules </=3cm, receive United Network Organ Sharing priority; nevertheless, dropout from the waiting list is common. Predictors of dropout include multiple tumors and tumors with a diameter >3 cm. Nonsurgical methods are commonly used to prevent tumor progression and thus prevent dropout. Expanding selection criteria results in more patients with HCC being cured at the expense of a higher incidence of recurrence. Molecular/biologic information is beginning to be incorporated into current staging systems in order to better predict HCC recurrence. In considering liver transplantation, the impact of the underlying liver disease is an important consideration; recurrent hepatitis C after transplant lowers patient survival independent of tumor recurrence.

Screening and treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma

Surveillance for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has become routine despite a lack of evidence of efficacy. Suitable candidates for surveillance include patients with cirrhosis and some subsets of noncirrhotic chronic hepatitis B carriers. The best surveillance testis ultrasonography at 6- to 12-month intervals. Serological tests are less effective. Defining an abnormal result is difficult in the cirrhotic liver. Diagnosis requires radiological investigations and may require a biopsy if the lesion is between 1 and 2 cm in diameter. In the face of an abnormal surveillance test and failure to confirm the diagnosis initially, enhanced follow-up is required. HCC can be treated for cure by liver transplantation, resection, or local ablation. For patients with suitable lesions, liver transplantation offers the best form of therapy. Chemoembolization offers increased survival over no therapy. Several experimental therapies are being investigated.

Role of liver transplantation for hepatobiliary malignant disorders

The role of liver transplantation for hepatobiliary malignant disorders remains controversial and will remain so until several crucial issues are resolved, the main difficulty being the shortage of organ donors. Furthermore, a consensus needs to be reached within the transplantation community on the tumour stage at which each disorder is too advanced to be salvaged by liver transplantation. Despite these limitations, there are generally accepted criteria that define when transplantation can, and should, be offered for hepatobiliary malignant disorders.

Biliary complications in 96 consecutive right lobe living donor transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Biliary reconstruction represents one of the most challenging parts of right lobe (RL) living donor liver transplantations (LDLTs). Different causes, surgical techniques, and treatments have been suggested but are incompletely defined.

METHODS

Between June 1999 and January 2002, 96 RL LDLTs were performed in our center. We reviewed the incidence of biliary complications in all the recipients.

RESULTS

Roux-en-Y reconstruction was performed in 53 cases (55.2%) and duct-to-duct was performed in 39 cases (40.6%). Both procedures were performed in 4 cases (4.2%). Multiple ducts (> or =2) were found in 58 grafts (60.4%). Thirty-nine recipients (40.6%) had 43 biliary complications: 21 had bile leaks, 22 had biliary strictures, and 4 had both complications. Patients with multiple ducts had a higher incidence of bile leaks than those patients with a single duct (P=0.049). No significant differences in complications were found between Roux-en-Y or duct-to-duct reconstructions. Freedom from biliary complications was 59% at 1 year and 55% at 2 years. The overall 1-year and 2-year survival rates for patients were 86% and 81%, respectively. The overall 1-year and 2-year survival rates for grafts were 80% and 77%, respectively. Occurrence of bile leaks affected patient and graft survival (76% and 65% 2-year patient and graft survival, respectively, vs. 89% and 85% for those without biliary leaks, P=0.07).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite technical modifications and application of various surgical techniques, biliary complications remain frequent after RL LDLT. Patients with multiple biliary reconstructions had a higher incidence of bile leaks. Patients who developed leaks had lower patient and graft survival rates.

Systemic treatment and liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: two ends of the therapeutic spectrum

Hepatocellular carcinoma is the fifth most common malignant disorder and causes nearly 1 million deaths a year worldwide. A background of cirrhosis is the major risk factor, and in Asia and subSaharan Africa, cirrhosis is attributable mainly to endemic hepatitis B infection. In Europe and the USA the incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma is increasing as a result of the high prevalence of hepatitis C. The only curative treatments are surgical resection or liver transplantation, but only a few patients are eligible for these procedures. Local ablative treatments such as ethanol injection can lengthen survival in selected patients, and radiofrequency ablation also shows promise. Unfortunately, most patients are suitable only for palliative treatment because of the extent of their tumour or background liver disease or both. For these patients, a wide range of therapeutic interventions have been assessed, including transarterial embolisation (with or without chemotherapy), hormone therapy with antioestrogens and androgens, octreotide, interferon, and both arterial and systemic chemotherapy, of which only chemoembolisation improves survival over symptomatic care. Tamoxifen is ineffective, and there are insufficient randomised data to show the benefit of any other intervention. In this review, we focus on two ends of the therapeutic spectrum--transplantation, which is highly effective but applicable to only a few patients, and systemic chemotherapy, which is of uncertain benefit but widely applicable.

Hepatocellular carcinoma in the Netherlands incidence, treatment and survival patterns

To examine recent trends of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in an unselected patient population in the Western world, cancer registration data of HCC in the Netherlands were analysed. Trends in incidence, mortality, treatment and survival, according to gender, age, stage of disease and period of diagnosis were studied. Age-standardised incidence of HCC in the Netherlands did not rise from 1989 to 2000. In men older than 75 years, there was a significant increase. Mortality due to primary liver cancer increased from 1989 to 2000. There was no change in the treatment pattern (1989-1998), whereas 73% of patients with HCC received no cancer-related therapy during this period of analysis. Twelve percent of the patients underwent either a partial liver resection or orthotopic liver transplantation. This low percentage suggests that patients with HCC must be analysed and discussed in specialised centres to minimise the number of patients not receiving possible curative therapy.

[Treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma in the cirrhotic liver]

The incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in cirrhotic patients is increasing. Despite advances in imaging and laboratory screening which allow earlier diagnosis, the surgeon is all too often confronted with an HCC of advanced stage or arising in the setting of severe cirrhosis; this severely limits the treatment possibilities. Treatment options are constrained not only by the characteristics of the tumor but also by hepatocellular reserve, severity of portal hypertension, and the general condition of the host. "Curative treatments" envisage the complete eradication of the malignancy; they include liver transplantation, resection, or tumor destruction by radiofrequency or alcohol ablation. They are most effective in the early stages of HCC. Total hepatectomy and transplantation, by far the most complex surgical therapy, also has the best results avoiding the all-too-frequent local recurrence of HCC in the residual liver. Other medical and interventional treatments (chemo-embolization, radiotherapy with lipiodol) can only slow the progress of the HCC. Goals for the future include more precise and directed screening of the population at risk, and better chemopreventive and chemotherapeutic treatments.

The role and limitation of living donor liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma

Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is restricted by the scarcity of cadaver grafts. Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) may potentially increase the applicability but its role and limitation are not clear. We studied the outcome of a cohort of 51 patients with unresectable HCC who were accepted on list for both options of deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT) and LDLT. Twenty-five of 51 (49%) patients had voluntary living donors (group 1) and 26 did not (group 2). Patients in group 1 were younger, and more often had a MELD score more than 20 or blood group other than O. Twenty-one patients of group 1 underwent LDLT after a median waiting time of 24 days (range, 2-126 days), but 4 did not because the donors were not suitable (HBsAg-positive, 2; ABO-incompatible, 1; liver dysfunction, 1). Of the 30 patients who remained on list, only 6 underwent DDLT after a median waiting time of 344 days (range, 22-1359 days, P <.005). Nineteen died before transplantation and 2 were alive but taken off the list because of disease progression (drop-out rate, 70%). One patient was alive on list and 2 had undergone transplantation outside Hong Kong. The 1-, 2-, 3-, and 4-year intention-to-treat survival rates were 88%, 76%, 66%, and 66%, respectively, for group 1 and 72%, 46%, 38%, and 31%, respectively, for group 2 (relative risk of death for group 1, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.14 to 0.90; P =.029). In conclusion, although complicated factors such as donor voluntarism and selection criteria limit the role of LDLT for HCC, LDLT allows more patients to undergo early transplantation and results in a better outcome.

Adult living donor liver transplantation for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: extending UNOS priority criteria

INTRODUCTION

For patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in particular, living donor liver transplant (LDLT) improves access to transplant. We report our results in 36 patients with HCC who underwent LDLT with a median follow-up >1 year. METHODS Underlying diagnoses included: hepatitis C (24), hepatitis B (9), cryptogenic cirrhosis (1), hemochromatosis (1), and primary biliary cirrhosis (1). Patients with tumors >or= 5 cm received IV doxorubicin intraoperatively and 6 cycles of doxorubicin at 3-week intervals. Patients were followed with CT scan and alpha-fetoprotein levels every 3 months for 2 years posttransplant. Mean waiting time, pretransplant treatment, tumor variables, and survival were analyzed. Univariate and multivariate analysis were done to analyze tumor variables; Kaplan-Meier and log rank were used to compare survivals. P < 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS Mean wait for LDLT was 62 days, compared with 459 days in 50 patients with HCC transplanted with cadaveric organs during the same time period (P = 0.0001). At median follow-up of 450 days, there have been 10 deaths due to non-tumor-related causes and 3 deaths from recurrence; recurrence has also been observed in 3 other patients. On univariate and multivariate analysis, bilobar distribution was the only significant tumor variable (P = 0.03, log rank = 0.02). Fifty-three percent of patients exceeded UNOS priority criteria. One- and two-year patient survivals were 75% and 60%, respectively. Freedom from recurrence at 365 and 730 days was 82% and 74%, respectively. Overall and in patients with HCC > 5 cm (n = 12), there were no statistically significant differences in survival or in freedom from recurrence between recipients of living donor and cadaveric grafts. CONCLUSION Although one third of patients had tumors > 5 cm, the incidence of recurrence as well as patient survival and freedom from recurrence are comparable to results after cadaveric transplant. LDLT allows timely transplantation in patients with early or with large HCC.

Liver transplantation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma

The preferred therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) apparently confined to the liver is surgical removal of the tumor. If the location of the tumor and the functional status of the liver are such that resection with an adequate margin can be achieved with low likelihood of subsequent hepatic failure, liver resection is the preferred approach. When HCC apparently localized to the liver is diagnosed in a patient who, by virtue of tumor characteristics or diminished hepatic reserve, is not a candidate for liver resection, liver transplantation becomes a consideration. This work outlines the approach at The Mount Sinai Hospital to the diagnosis, evaluation, preoperative management, transplantation, and posttransplant follow-up in patients with unresectable HCC. The allocation of livers to patients with HCC is reviewed, and predictors of tumor recurrence and results of liver transplantation for HCC are discussed. Finally, the impact of viral hepatitis and of immunosuppression on transplant outcome are discussed.