1
|
Goette A, Auricchio A, Boriani G, Braunschweig F, Terradellas JB, Burri H, Camm AJ, Crijns H, Dagres N, Deharo JC, Dobrev D, Hatala R, Hindricks G, Hohnloser SH, Leclercq C, Lewalter T, Lip GYH, Merino JL, Mont L, Prinzen F, Proclemer A, Pürerfellner H, Savelieva I, Schilling R, Steffel J, van Gelder IC, Zeppenfeld K, Zupan I, Heidbüchel H, Boveda S, Defaye P, Brignole M, Chun J, Guerra Ramos JM, Fauchier L, Svendsen JH, Traykov VB, Heinzel FR. EHRA White Paper: knowledge gaps in arrhythmia management—status 2019. Europace 2019; 21:993-994. [DOI: 10.1093/europace/euz055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2019] [Accepted: 03/15/2019] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Clinicians accept that there are many unknowns when we make diagnostic and therapeutic decisions. Acceptance of uncertainty is essential for the pursuit of the profession: bedside decisions must often be made on the basis of incomplete evidence. Over the years, physicians sometimes even do not realize anymore which the fundamental gaps in our knowledge are. As clinical scientists, however, we have to halt and consider what we do not know yet, and how we can move forward addressing those unknowns. The European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) believes that scanning the field of arrhythmia / cardiac electrophysiology to identify knowledge gaps which are not yet the subject of organized research, should be undertaken on a regular basis. Such a review (White Paper) should concentrate on research which is feasible, realistic, and clinically relevant, and should not deal with futuristic aspirations. It fits with the EHRA mission that these White Papers should be shared on a global basis in order to foster collaborative and needed research which will ultimately lead to better care for our patients. The present EHRA White Paper summarizes knowledge gaps in the management of atrial fibrillation, ventricular tachycardia/sudden death and heart failure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andreas Goette
- St. Vincenz-Krankenhaus GmbH, Cardiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Am Busdorf 2, Paderborn, Germany
- Working Group Molecular Electrophysiology, University Hospital Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Angelo Auricchio
- Department of Cardiology, Fondazione Cardiocentro Ticino, Lugano (Ticino), Switzerland
| | - Giuseppe Boriani
- Cardiology Division, Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Policlinico di Modena, Modena, Italy
| | | | | | - Haran Burri
- Department of Cardiology, University Hospital of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - A John Camm
- St. George's, University of London, Molecular and Clinical Sciences Research Institute, London, UK
| | - Harry Crijns
- Department of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht UMC+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Nikolaos Dagres
- Department of Electrophysiology, Heart Center Leipzig at University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Jean-Claude Deharo
- Department of Cardiology, Aix Marseille Université, CHU la Timone, Marseille, France
| | - Dobromir Dobrev
- University Duisburg-Essen, Institute of Pharmacology, Essen, Germany
| | - Robert Hatala
- Department of Cardiology and Angiology, National Cardiovascular Institute, NUSCH, Bratislava, Slovak Republic
| | - Gerhard Hindricks
- Department of Electrophysiology, Heart Center Leipzig at University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Stefan H Hohnloser
- Division of Clinical Electrophysiology, Department of Cardiology, J.W. Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany
| | | | - Thorsten Lewalter
- Department of Cardiology and Intensive Care, Hospital for Internal Medicine Munich South, Munich, Germany
- Department of Cardiology, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Gregory Y H Lip
- Liverpool Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Liverpool and Liverpool Heart & Chest Hospital, Liverpool, UK
- Aalborg Thrombosis Research Unit, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Jose Luis Merino
- Hospital Universitario La Paz, Arrhythmia and Robotic EP Unit, Madrid, Spain
| | - Lluis Mont
- Department of Cardiology, Hospital Clinic, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Frits Prinzen
- Department of Physiology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | | | - Helmut Pürerfellner
- Department of Cardiology, Ordensklinikum Linz Elisabethinen, Academic Teaching Hospital, Linz, Austria
| | - Irina Savelieva
- St. George's, University of London, Molecular and Clinical Sciences Research Institute, London, UK
| | | | - Jan Steffel
- University Heart Center Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Isabelle C van Gelder
- Department Of Cardiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Katja Zeppenfeld
- Department of Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Center (Lumc), Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Igor Zupan
- Department Of Cardiology, University Clinical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Hein Heidbüchel
- Antwerp University and Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Serge Boveda
- Cardiology Department, Clinique Pasteur, Toulouse, France
| | - Pascal Defaye
- CHU Hôpital Albert Michalon, Unité de Rythmologie Service De Cardiologie, FR-38043 Grenoble Cedex 09, France
| | - Michele Brignole
- Department of Cardiology, Ospedali Del Tigullio, Via Don Bobbio 25, IT-16033 Lavagna (GE), Italy
| | - Jongi Chun
- CCB, Cardiology Department, Med. Klinik Iii, Markuskrankenhaus, Wilhelm Epstein Str. 4, DE-60431 Frankfurt, Germany
| | | | - Laurent Fauchier
- Service de Cardiologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Trousseau et Université de Tours, Faculté de Médecine, Tours, France
| | - Jesper Hastrup Svendsen
- Department of Cardiology, The Heart Centre, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Vassil B Traykov
- Department of Invasive Electrophysiology and Cardiac Pacing, Clinic of Cardiology, Acibadem City Clinic Tokuda Hospital, Sofia, Bulgaria
| | - Frank R Heinzel
- Charité University Medicine, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Berlin, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Gulizia M, Mangiameli S, Orazi S, Chiarandà G, Boriani G, Piccione G, DiGiovanni N, Colletti A, Puntrello C, Butera G, Vasco C, Vaccaro I, Scardace G, Grammatico A. Randomized comparison between Ramp and Burst+ atrial antitachycardia pacing therapies in patients suffering from sinus node disease and atrial fibrillation and implanted with a DDDRP device. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2006; 8:465-73. [PMID: 16798758 DOI: 10.1093/europace/eul055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
AIMS Atrial tachycardia and flutter frequently occur in association with atrial fibrillation and may be treated by overdrive pacing in patients who receive pacemakers with antitachycardia pacing (ATP) capabilities. The PITAGORA trial was a multi-centre, randomized, cross-over study aimed at comparing two different ATP modes for atrial tachyarrhythmia (AT) termination in patients suffering from sinus node disease (SND). METHODS AND RESULTS One hundred and seventy-six patients (72 M, age 71+/-9 years) received a Medtronic AT500 pacemaker. All patients were on class IC or III antiarrhythmic drugs. After a 5-month observation period, 170 patients were randomized to either Ramp or Burst+ ATP therapy; 4 months later they crossed over. One hundred and fifty-seven patients completed the 13 months of follow-up; 114 (72.6%) suffered 6088 AT episodes. In 75 patients, 1904 AT episodes were treated and 934 (49.1%) successfully terminated. The median value of individual patients' ATP efficacy was 60%. Burst+ terminated 387 out of 873 AT episodes (44%) in 58 patients. Ramp terminated 547 out of 1031 AT episodes (53%, P<0.001) in 56 patients. Ramp efficacy was significantly (P<0.01) and directly correlated with AT cycle length (ATCL), whereas Burst+ efficacy was not. Ramp showed higher (P<0.001) termination efficacy than Burst+ for ATCL >240 ms. Quality of life, as measured by the EuroQoL questionnaire, and number of symptoms significantly improved in the overall population. This improvement was significantly higher in patients with ATP efficacy >60%. CONCLUSION In patients suffering from SND and AT, Ramp therapy shows higher termination efficacy than Burst+ therapy in AT episodes with ATCL >240 ms. Further studies are required to show the impact of ATP on clinical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michele Gulizia
- Cardiology Department, Garibaldi-Nesima Hospital, Via Palermo 636, Catania 95122, Italy.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Boriani G, Padeletti L, Santini M, Gulizia M, Capucci A, Botto G, Ricci R, Molon G, Accogli M, Vicentini A, Biffi M, Vimercati M, Grammatico A. Predictors of atrial antitachycardia pacing efficacy in patients affected by brady-tachy form of sick sinus syndrome and implanted with a DDDRP device. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2005; 16:714-23. [PMID: 16050828 DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2005.40716.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
UNLABELLED Predictors of ATP efficacy in brady/tachy patients. BACKGROUND Recent options to treat atrial tachyarrhythmias (ATA) include implantable devices delivering antitachycardia pacing therapies (ATP). No prospective study selected patients with higher chances of episode termination by ATP or indicated the most effective ATP use. Our aim was to study ATP efficacy in patients with brady-tachy form of sinus node disease (SND), identifying clinical factors, ATA characteristics, and device features predicting ATP efficacy. METHODS AND RESULTS Three hundred and sixteen patients (105 M, aged 71.1+/-8.8 years) received a DDDRP pacemaker and were prospectively followed. Median follow-up was 18 months: 37,125 ATA episodes occurred in 217 patients; ATP treated 5,536 of them. Overall, ATP efficacy was 50.0%. A multivariate analysis identified longer arrhythmia cycle lengths (OR=1.25; CI=1.07-1.47) and shorter delays to ATP delivery (OR=0.15; CI=0.10-0.22) as independent predictors of ATP efficacy for episodes preceded by >or=5 minutes of sinus rhythm. Additionally, ATP efficacy for all treated episodes was predicted by lower New York Heart Association (NYHA) class (OR=0.64; CI=0.42-0.98), episode classification as nonimmediate recurrence of ATA (non-IRAT) (OR=0.07; CI=0.02-0.33), absence of overlap in the device detection windows (OR=0.54; CI=0.32-0.91), and flecainide treatment (OR=2.22; CI=1.04-4.71). CONCLUSIONS In patients paced for SND, multivariate analysis shows that ATP efficacy is associated to longer arrhythmia cycle lengths, shorter ATP delivery delays, NYHA class I, episode classification as non-IRAT, absence of overlap in the atrial arrhythmia device detection windows, and flecainide treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giuseppe Boriani
- Institute of Cardiology, University of Bologna and Azienda Ospedaliera, S.Orsola-Malpighi, Bologna, Italy.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|