[Surgical treatment of patients with spinal infection]

Conservative versus early surgical treatment in the management of pyogenic spondylodiscitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Spondylodiscitis is the commonest spine infection, and pyogenic spondylodiscitis is the most common subtype. Whilst antibiotic therapy is the mainstay of treatment, some advocate that early surgery can improve mortality, relapse rates, and length of stay. Given that the condition carries a high mortality rate of up to 20%, the most effective treatment must be identified. We aimed to compare the mortality, relapse rate, and length of hospital stay of conservative versus early surgical treatment of pyogenic spondylodiscitis. All major databases were searched for original studies, which were evaluated using a qualitative synthesis, meta-analyses, influence, and regression analyses. The meta-analysis, with an overall pooled sample size of 10,954 patients from 21 studies, found that the pooled mortality among the early surgery patient subgroup was 8% versus 13% for patients treated conservatively. The mean proportion of relapse/failure among the early surgery subgroup was 15% versus 21% for the conservative treatment subgroup. Further, it concluded that early surgical treatment, when compared to conservative management, is associated with a 40% and 39% risk reduction in relapse/failure rate and mortality rate, respectively, and a 7.75 days per patient reduction in length of hospital stay (p < 0.01). The meta-analysis demonstrated that early surgical intervention consistently significantly outperforms conservative management in relapse/failure and mortality rates, and length of stay, in patients with pyogenic spondylodiscitis.

Spontaneous spondylodiscitis: review, incidence, management, and clinical outcome in 44 patients

OBJECTIVESpontaneous spondylodiscitis remains uncommon but is a serious complication of the vertebral column. Risk factors include diabetes, hemodialysis, intravenous drug abuse, and chronic steroid use, and pain is the most common presenting symptom. This study aims to review the literature and report on the incidence, management, and clinical outcome of spontaneous spondylodiscitis in 44 patients.METHODSThis is a prospective study including 44 patients with spontaneous spondylodiscitis managed in the neurosurgery department of Cairo University Hospitals during the period between January 2012 and October 2017. All patients had a full clinical assessment, laboratory tests, radiological studies in the form of MRI with and without contrast, and a postoperative follow-up of up to 12 months.RESULTSTwelve cases underwent conservative treatment in the form of complete bed rest, intravenous antibiotics, and a spinal brace. Ten cases underwent surgical intervention in the form of laminectomy, debridement, and open biopsy. Twenty-two cases underwent laminectomy and surgical stabilization with fusion. There were 15 cases of tuberculous spondylodiscitis, 6 cases of brucellosis, 6 cases of pyogenic infection, and 17 cases in which no organism could be detected.CONCLUSIONSOnce the primary diagnosis is confirmed, early and adequately prolonged antibiotic therapy is recommended for spontaneous spondylodiscitis. Some cases can be successfully treated with conservative treatment alone, whereas surgery may be needed in other cases such as severe destruction of endplates, spinal abscess formation, mechanical instability, neurological deficits, and severe pain that have failed to respond to conservative treatment.

Infections associated with spinal implants

Spinal infections represent a difficult challenge to treating clinicians. Infections in the presence of implants are even more so. In this review the literature appears to reflect a change of practice in which the aim is to retain implants if possible. The newer spinal procedures such as disc replacements pose different problems largely due to the more difficult access. The situation in the spine is more difficult than in general orthopaedics when dealing with infection due to the requirement for stability and to protect neurological function. The main thrust of management, therefore, is early diagnosis and a high index of suspicion followed by adequate if not radical management in a multidisciplinary setting. In the event prevention is better than cure and therefore consideration of the various mechanisms to avoid infection must be taken. There are some 'novel' considerations for the avoidance of infection alongside the tried and tested techniques. There are also new procedures for wound closure and the elimination of dead space.

Spondylodiscitis: diagnosis and treatment

BACKGROUND

We present our experience in the diagnosis and treatment of spondylodiscitis.

METHODS

27 patients with spondylodiscitis were studied. There were 15 men and 12 women, with ages ranging from 26 to 85 years. Of the 27 cases, there were 21 patients with pyogenic spondylodiscitis, 6 patients with tuberculosis spondylodiscitis, and 8 patients with diabetes mellitus complication. Two patients presented with tetraparesis, 13 with paraparesis, and 1 with hemiparesis. Seventeen patients underwent surgical treatment, among whom surgical intervention with instrumentation was performed on 5 patients, and emergency operation was performed on 6 patients.

RESULTS

Fourteen patients were judged as "excellent," 8 patients as "good," and 4 patients as "no change." One patient died because of infection by penicillin-resistant Staphylococcus pneumoniae.

CONCLUSION

It is very difficult to diagnose spondylodiscitis at the first medical examination. Most spondylodiscitis patients often first visit a department of internal medicine. We strongly recommend that all doctors, especially doctors examining diabetes mellitus patients daily, should be well informed of spondylodiscitis in order to improve its diagnosis.