Une interposition prothétique synthétique inter-vésico-vaginale implantée par voie vaginale diminue-t-elle le risque de récidive de cystocèle ? Recommandations pour la pratique clinique

Efficacy and safety outcomes after genital prolapse repair by the vaginal route using the Avaulta Plus® mesh

OBJECTIVE(S)

With aging population, a rise in anterior wall prolapse surgery is expected. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of genital prolapse repair by the vaginal route using a mixed polypropylene and porcine skin mesh (Avaulta Plus®).

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective study conducted at Tenon University Hospital, Paris, France. We included seventy-nine women who underwent anterior wall prolapse repair using Avaulta Plus® mesh by the transobturator route for genital prolapse ≥ stage II from September 2008 to December 2017. Pre- and postoperative pelvic organ prolapse classification, functional symptoms, quality of life scores were evaluated, and complications were recorded.

RESULTS

The anatomical success rate for anterior wall prolapse was 97 %. The postoperative complication rate was 29.1 % among which the mesh exposure rate was 7.6 %. Pelvic symptoms such as vaginal discomfort and pelvic heaviness were significantly improved (p < 0.01). Voiding dysfunction were significantly improved (p < 0.01). A significant improvement in the PFDI-20 score (p < 0.01) and PFIQ-7 score (p < 0.01) was observed. After 3 years of follow-up, the recurrence rate was 12 %.

CONCLUSION(S)

Prolapse repair using the Avaulta Plus® mesh is effective and results in a significant improvement in quality of life. The complication rate, including mesh exposure, is acceptable.

[Cystocele repair by a light tension-free vaginal mesh: results after 6 years of follow-up]

INTRODUCTION

The objective of this study was to evaluate the long-term anatomical and functional efficacy, but also the safety of tension-free vaginal mesh in cystocele repair.

METHODS

This retrospective and monocentric study included 90 women who underwent a prolapse repair between June 2006 and November 2008. A light-weight polypropylene vaginal mesh (22g/m2, Novasilk COLOPLAST®) was used without any fixation. Females were followed at 1 month, 1 year, 3 years and 6 years. Only long-term results are presented in this study. The anatomical result was assessed by the POP-Q classification and the functional results by standardized symptoms (PFDI-20), sexuality (PISQ-12) and quality of life (PFIQ-7) questionnaires.

RESULTS

6 years after surgery, the follow-up rate was 74%. Anatomically, the prolapse recurrence rate (Ba≥0) was 17% (n=8). Functionally, the overall patient satisfaction rate was 89%. Quality of life and symptoms scores (4,11±8.45 vs. 17.5±14.4 and 35.8±15.9 vs 94±23.4 respectively) were significantly improved (p<0.001). Concerning the prevalence of the complication, the retraction and exposition rate was 1.7% (n=1) and a re-intervention rate was 6.7% (n=4). The rate of de novo dyspareunia was 1.7% (n=1).

CONCLUSION

In this short retrospective series of vaginal mesh interposition for cystocele repair, the prevalence of medium-term patient satisfaction was high.

[Evolution of clinical practices in the surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in a "vaginalist" team over the period 2010-2015: A paradigm shift towards pluripotency]

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether the 2011 FDA alert and French Guidelines have impacted the routine surgical practice in the management of pelvic organ prolapse in a "vaginalist" team over the period 2010-2015.

METHODS

Retrospective study involving all patients undergoing surgical management of anterior and/or apical symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse during the civil years 2010 and 2015. Both naive and relapsed prolapses were eligible.

RESULTS

Overall, 338 patients were included: 187 in 2010 and 151 in 2015. Among patients with naive prolapse, we observed a significant increase in the number of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexies (11.1% in 2010 versus 34.4% in 2015, P=0.001) and a significant decline in the use of native tissue repair (67.6% in 2010 versus 39% in 2015, P=0.001). While the number of transvaginal meshes did not decline over the study period, their indications displayed a significant evolution towards a restricted use to advanced stages. We did not observe any difference regarding the treatment of recurred pelvic organ prolapse. Vaginal route remained the preferred approach in this indication.

CONCLUSION

In our "vaginalist" team, routine practice has significantly evolved over the period 2010-2015, resulting in a diversification of the healthcare offer. This paradigm shift towards pluripotency is mandatory, since patients' preference should also drive the choice of both surgical route and technique.