Tolérance des glucocorticoïdes dans la polyarthrite rhumatoïde : élaboration de recommandations pour la pratique clinique, à partir d’une analyse systématique de la littérature et de l’opinion d’experts

Factors influencing the use of tocilizumab as monotherapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in a real-life setting: results at 1 year of the ACT-SOLO study

INTRODUCTION

Using a biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (bDMARD) as monotherapy in clinical practice for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is common and recognised by health authorities although current guidelines recommend to combine them with conventional synthetic (cs)DMARDs. This study mainly aimed to search for real-life factors influencing the use of tocilizumab as MONO or in combination (COMBO).

METHODS

In this non-interventional, prospective, national, multicentre study, data were collected every 3 months over a 12-month period in RA patients starting tocilizumab. The proportion of monotherapy patients was described, together with significant explicative factors.

RESULTS

Among the 577 analysed patients recruited from January 2012 to August 2013 (228 monotherapy patients; 40%), 79% were women, mean RA duration was 11±9 years, previous RA treatments included bDMARDs and csDMARDs in 75% of cases and mean Disease Activity Score 28 joints-Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (DAS28-ESR) was 5.2±1.3 at inclusion. Explicative factors for monotherapy were at least 65 years (OR=1.47, p=0.0485), no methotrexate within the two last years (OR=5.96, p<0.0001), past severe infection (OR=1.99, p=0.0272) and higher baseline DAS28-ESR (OR=1.22, p=0.0086). Regarding clinical results (DAS28-ESR, Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) and Simple Disease Activity Index (SDAI) low disease activity and remission; ACR20/50/70 and European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) response; Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) score), no relevant differences between monotherapy and combination patients were observed at 1 year. A total of 23 tocilizumab-treated patients (4%) experienced serious infections; no new safety signals were noted with no differences between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

ACT-SOLO confirms the high proportion of RA patients receiving tocilizumab as MONO in clinical practice. The study also showed that clinical results at 1 year were similar between MONO and COMBO patients in a real-life setting.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT01474291.

Cardiovascular risk induced by low-dose corticosteroids in rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic literature review

OBJECTIVES

To assess the association between cardiovascular (CV) risk and low-dose corticosteroids (LD-CT, defined as a daily dose <10mg/day of prednisone) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients.

METHODS

DATA SOURCE

A systematic review of the literature up to June 2009 was performed.

DATA EXTRACTION

(1) cardiovascular risk factors: high blood pressure, glycemia and lipid profile, carotid intima-media thickness, pulse-wave velocity, ventricular function; (2) "hard" outcomes: heart failure (HF), stroke, myocardial infarction (MI) or mortality.

DATA ANALYSIS

descriptive, comparing CV risk between LD-CT-treated RA patients and LD-CT-non-treated RA patients.

RESULTS

Of the 1138 screened reports, the literature search identified 37 assessing CV risk in LD-CT treated RA. The analysis showed a protective effect on serum lipid profile, an increase of insulin resistance or glycemia, probably no effect on blood pressure, no effect on atherosclerosis, discrepancies regarding arterial stiffness and no effect on ventricular function or heart rate variability. An association of LD-CT with major CV events was found in 4/6 studies. This included MI (HR=1.7 [1.2-2.3]), stroke (OR=4.36 [1.60-11.90] for LDC between 6 and 10mg/day), mortality (HR=2.03 [1.25-3.32]) and a composite index of CV events (in the group of rheumatoid factor positive RA, HR=2.21 [1.22-4.00]). Two studies did not find any significant association between LD-CT exposure and mortality (OR=2.25 [0.29-102.5]) or a composite index of CV events (OR=1.3 [0.8-2.0]).

CONCLUSION

Although the literature review showed poor association between LDC exposure and CV risk factors, a trend of increasing major CV events was identified.