[Economic analysis versus the principle of guaranteed safety in blood transfusion]

[Is it possible to organize into a hierarchy blood donation contraindications?]

Because it symbolizes henceforth the sanitary risk and fears which are linked to it, the blood transfusion must master the potential or real risks associated to its practice. The analysis of these risks leads to confirm the initial selection phase of candidates for blood donation as an always original stage of the blood transfusion safety towards the identified infectious risks, but also mainly towards the emergent or modelled risks. The evaluation of the current system of prevention leads to consider two potential dangers: the ineffectiveness of the selection because of the lack of meaning given to this stage, and the donors' disaffection caused by badly accepted or badly justified deferrals. The deficit of meaning can be due to an insufficient information of the population as for the policy of collective prevention of transfusion-transmitted infectious diseases. It can be worsened by the construction of the pre-donation interview which can appear as a succession of questions without visible links. This paper suggests risk analysis to blood transfusion, and a reflection to improve this important stage of blood product safety approach represent by the selection of candidates to a blood donation.