[Blood transfusion and bacterial risk]

Elimination and multiplication of bacteria during preparation and storage of buffy coat-derived platelet concentrates

BACKGROUND

The prevalence of bacterial contamination of random-donor platelet concentrates (PCs) is considerably lower than that of blood donations. Which key steps of the preparation procedure contribute to the elimination of bacteria was investigated.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Ten bacteria species were used. Blood donations were spiked with bacteria and stored at 22 degrees C for 8 hours. The buffy coats were kept for 6 hours. PCs were prepared from pools of 4 buffy coats. At each preparation step and during PC storage, bacteria contents were measured. In additional experiments, the titers of spiked blood and buffy coats were determined after storage at 20, 22, or 24 degrees C for 8 and up to 24 hours, respectively.

RESULTS

Enterobacter cloacae, Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Serratia marcescens, and Yersinia enterocolitica were completely inactivated during storage in blood or buffy coats. Titer reduction was between 3.32 and 4.62 log. Bacillus cereus, Propionibacterium acnes, Staphylococcus aureus, and Staphylococcus epidermidis did not multiply. Compared with their values in spiked blood the titers in the PCs were reduced by 1.7 to 2.8 log. Klebsiella pneumoniae was the only species that grew in blood. With the exception of P. acnes, those species that were not removed by the preparation process multiplied in the PCs. Remarkable donor-to-donor variations of the bactericidal activities of buffy coats were detected when the storage time was prolonged to 24 hours.

CONCLUSIONS

Bacteria are significantly eliminated by the preparation procedure for random donor PCs. Also, blood and buffy coats are bactericidal for most species. When buffy-coat storage is prolonged, it cannot, however, be predicted whether specific strains vanish or multiply.

[Evaluation of adherence to the regulations for declaration of notification of transfusion reactions with fever and chills. A study of the Association Inter-Régionale du Sud-Est d'Hémovigilance (AIRSEH)]

Febrile non-hemolytic transfusion reactions (FNHTR) are the most frequently reported acute adverse effects of blood products, and should be notified within 48 h according to the hemovigilance regulation. In order to study the conformity of these notifications and to search for factors associated with non-conformity, we retrospectively studied all FNHTR notified by voluntary centers of the AIRSEH group from 1st September 1994 to 31st December 1999. Seven hundred and sixty-one FNHTR were registered by 10 centers, most of them were benign (grade 1); 67.8% were non-conform. The non-conformity was associated with the number of biological investigations performed (median number, respectively, 4.24 and 2.94--P = 0.038--in non-conform and conform notifications--P = 0.038) in univariate analysis. Using a logistic regression model, center and severity were the only two factors significantly associated with non-conformity. Different center practices, and in particular the interface between the hospital and the blood bank, may be responsible for the effect center. Moreover, the non-conformity concerns first of all benign FNHTR. A stronger separation between alert and epidemiological surveillance is proposed in order to improve the notifications' conformity.