[Chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced cancers of the uterine neck. Retrospective study of 92 patients treated at the Institute Curie between 1986 and 1998]]

The Role of Adjuvant Hysterectomy After Radiotherapy in Cervical Cancer

The aim of this study was to evaluate the morbidity and survival outcome following radical hysterectomy after chemoradiotherapy in the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stages IB-IIB cervical cancer patients in whom intracavitory brachytherapy was not feasible. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of our patients who underwent adjuvant radical hysterectomy between January 2005 and December 2012. Post-operative complications were graded according to the grading system of Chassagne et al. (Radiother Oncol 26:195-202, 1993). Survival analysis was done using Kaplan-Meir method. Between January 2005 and December 2012, 43 patients underwent type 2 radical hysterectomy after external beam radiotherapy and concurrent chemotherapy. The median age of the study group was 44 years (range 28-63 years). There were no perioperative deaths. In the early post-operative period, there were 45 complications in 29 patients of which three were of grade 3 severity. The most common post operative complications were urinary tract infections and lymphoedema. The median follow-up time was 29 months (range 9-68 months). The 5-year overall survival was 85.5 % and disease-free survival 82.1 %. This study shows that radical hysterectomy is feasible with good survival outcome and acceptable morbidity after chemoradiotherapy in cervical cancer patients.

Long-term analysis of clinical outcome and complications in locally advanced cervical cancer patients administered concomitant chemoradiation followed by radical surgery

OBJECTIVE

Preoperative chemoradiation (CT/RT) has been shown to achieve encouraging results in terms of clinical outcome in locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC). The study aims at analyzing the long-term results of this multimodal approach in a single institution series of 184 cases.

METHODS

Patients underwent whole pelvic irradiation combined with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil. After evaluation of clinical response, patients were triaged to surgery. Surgical morbidity was classified according to Chassagne grading system. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to assess the prognostic and predictive role of clinicopathological parameters.

RESULTS

Clinical response was observed in 96.1% of cases. A total of 174 cases were submitted to radical surgery: 124 patients (71.3%) showed complete/microscopic pathological response. In multivariate analysis, clinical response, stage of disease, and histotype predicted response to CT/RT. With a median follow-up of 58 months, recurrence and death of disease were observed in 42 and 40 patients, respectively. The 5-year DFS was 75.5%, while the 5-year OS was 77.4%. Patients with no residual disease showed a significant longer DFS than patients with microscopic (p value = 0.0128), and macroscopic (p value = 0.0001) residual tumor after treatment. In multivariate analysis, residual tumor and stage of disease were the two most relevant prognostic factors for DFS and OS. As far as long-term toxicity is concerned, 8 out of 22 complications were grade 3/4.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative CT/RT is worth further investigation in LACC patients, providing encouraging survival outcomes and a favourable long-term toxicity profile.

Association concomitante préopératoire de radiothérapie et de chimiothérapie dans les cancers du col utérin opérables de stades IB2, IIA et IIB proximal de gros volume

PURPOSE

To evaluate preliminary results in terms of toxicity, local tumour control, and survival after preoperative concomitant chemoradiation for operable bulky cervical carcinomas.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between December 1991 and October 2001, 42 patients (pts) with bulky cervical carcinomas stage IB2 (11 pts), IIA (15 pts), and IIB (16 pts) with 1/3 proximal parametrial invasion. Median age was 45 years (range: 24-75 years) and clinical median cervical tumour size was 5 cm (range: 4.1-8 cm). A clinical pelvic lymph node involvement has been observed in 10 pts. All patients underwent preoperative external beam pelvic radiation therapy (EBPRT) and concomitant chemotherapy during the first and the fourth radiation weeks combining 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin. The pelvic dose was 40.50 Gy over 4.5 weeks. EBPRT was followed by low-dose-rate uterovaginal brachytherapy with a total dose of 20 Gy in 17 pts. After a rest period of 5-6 weeks, all pts underwent class II modified radical hysterectomy with bilateral lymphadenectomy. Para-aortic lymphadenectomy was performed in eight pts without pathologic para-aortic lymph node involvement. Twenty-one of 25 pts who had not received preoperative uterovaginal brachytherapy underwent postoperative low-dose-rate vaginal brachytherapy of 20 Gy. The median follow-up was 31 months (range: 3-123 months).

RESULTS

Pathologic residual tumour or lymph node involvement was observed in 23 pts. Among the 22 pts with pathologic residual cervical tumour (<0.5 cm: nine pts; >or=0.5 to <or=1 cm: three pts; >1 cm: 10 pts), seven underwent preoperative EBRT followed by uterovaginal brachytherapy vs. 15 treated with preoperative EBRT alone (P = 0.23). Four pts had pathologic lymph node involvement, three pts had vaginal residual tumour, and four pts had pathologic parametrial invasion. The 2- and 5-year overall survival rates were 85% and 74%, respectively. The 2- and 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rates were 80% and 71%, respectively. After multivariate analysis, the pathologic residual cervical tumour size was the single independent factor decreasing the probability of DFS (P = 0.0054). The 5-year local control rate and metastatic failure rate were 90% and 83.5%, respectively. Haematological effects were moderate. However, six pts had grade 3 acute intestinal toxicity. Four severe late complications requiring surgical intervention were observed (one small bowel complication, three ureteral complications).

CONCLUSION

Primary concomitant chemoradiation followed surgery for bulky operable stage I-II cervical carcinomas can be employed with acceptable toxicity. However, systematic preoperative uterovaginal brachytherapy should increase local tumour control.

Anal canal cancer treatment: practical limitations of routine prescription of concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy

This study is an analysis of the criteria considered when prescribing concomitant chemotherapy and radiotherapy, as a routine treatment for patients with anal canal cancer, and related complications. Between 1990 and 1996, 67 patients were treated at Institut Curie for invasive, nonmetastatic cancer of the anal canal. Median age was 65 years (range, 35–90 years). TNM stage distribution was as follows: seven T1, 17 T2, 27 T3, 16 T4, and 22 N+ patients. A total of 29 patients (i.e., five T1/T2, and 24 T3/T4) received concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Radiotherapy volumes and dose and prescribed dose for chemotherapy were not statistically different from one group of patients to another. Only 55% of T3/T4 patients underwent standard chemoradiation treatment for anal canal cancer. Age was the one of main factor in determining if the patient would undergo concomitant chemotherapy or not. For the T3/T4 patients, concomitant chemotherapy was prescribed to 69% of patients <55 years, 90% of patients between 56 and 64 years, 45% of patients between 65 and 75 years, and 20% of patients over 75 years (P<0.02).Overall survival at 4 years was 66%. The 4 years overall survival rate of T3/T4 patients, who underwent concomitant chemotherapy, was 72%, and that of T3/T4 patient who did not, was 34% (P<0.04). The patients who did not undergo chemotherapy were significantly older. The difference in cause-specific survival rates (72 vs 48%) was not significant. Relapse-free interval without local recurrence at 4 years was 70%. Relapse-free interval of T3/T4 patients was 78% with chemotherapy and 60% without chemotherapy (p=NS). Rates of treatment discontinuation and early toxicity were not statistically different. Late complications occurred in 33 patients, eight of whom had grade 2/3 tumours. At 2 years, complications occurred in 39% of patients who had undergone concomitant chemotherapy, and in 20% of patients who had not (p<0.02). Differences in grade 2/3 complications were not significant. In conclusion, although radiotherapy with concomitant chemotherapy is considered the current ‘gold-standard’ treatment for anal canal cancer, in our daily experience, only 55% of our T3/T4 patients have undergone this treatment. The remainder did not undergo chemotherapy mainly because they were deemed too old. In this series, no increase in local control and cause-specific survival was observed in patients who received concomitant chemotherapy; this may be due to the small number of patients included in the series. The increased rate of late complications observed in patients who received the combined treatment, however, provides evidence that this treatment should be restricted to younger patients without comorbidity and therefore justifies our position. Perhaps reduction of doses of chemotherapy must be discussed for older patients.