1
|
Tudor M, Gilbert A, Lepleux C, Temelie M, Hem S, Armengaud J, Brotin E, Haghdoost S, Savu D, Chevalier F. A Proteomic Study Suggests Stress Granules as New Potential Actors in Radiation-Induced Bystander Effects. Int J Mol Sci 2021; 22:ijms22157957. [PMID: 34360718 PMCID: PMC8347418 DOI: 10.3390/ijms22157957] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2021] [Revised: 07/16/2021] [Accepted: 07/20/2021] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Besides the direct effects of radiations, indirect effects are observed within the surrounding non-irradiated area; irradiated cells relay stress signals in this close proximity, inducing the so-called radiation-induced bystander effect. These signals received by neighboring unirradiated cells induce specific responses similar with those of direct irradiated cells. To understand the cellular response of bystander cells, we performed a 2D gel-based proteomic study of the chondrocytes receiving the conditioned medium of low-dose irradiated chondrosarcoma cells. The conditioned medium was directly analyzed by mass spectrometry in order to identify candidate bystander factors involved in the signal transmission. The proteomic analysis of the bystander chondrocytes highlighted 20 proteins spots that were significantly modified at low dose, implicating several cellular mechanisms, such as oxidative stress responses, cellular motility, and exosomes pathways. In addition, the secretomic analysis revealed that the abundance of 40 proteins in the conditioned medium of 0.1 Gy irradiated chondrosarcoma cells was significantly modified, as compared with the conditioned medium of non-irradiated cells. A large cluster of proteins involved in stress granules and several proteins involved in the cellular response to DNA damage stimuli were increased in the 0.1 Gy condition. Several of these candidates and cellular mechanisms were confirmed by functional analysis, such as 8-oxodG quantification, western blot, and wound-healing migration tests. Taken together, these results shed new lights on the complexity of the radiation-induced bystander effects and the large variety of the cellular and molecular mechanisms involved, including the identification of a new potential actor, namely the stress granules.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mihaela Tudor
- Department of Life and Environmental Physics, HoriaHulubei National Institute of Physics and Nuclear Engineering, 077125 Magurele, Romania; (M.T.); (M.T.); (D.S.)
- Faculty of Biology, University of Bucharest, 050095 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Antoine Gilbert
- UMR6252 CIMAP, Team Applications in Radiobiology with Accelerated Ions, CEA-CNRS-ENSICAEN-Université de Caen Normandie, 14000 Caen, France; (A.G.); (C.L.); (S.H.)
| | - Charlotte Lepleux
- UMR6252 CIMAP, Team Applications in Radiobiology with Accelerated Ions, CEA-CNRS-ENSICAEN-Université de Caen Normandie, 14000 Caen, France; (A.G.); (C.L.); (S.H.)
| | - Mihaela Temelie
- Department of Life and Environmental Physics, HoriaHulubei National Institute of Physics and Nuclear Engineering, 077125 Magurele, Romania; (M.T.); (M.T.); (D.S.)
| | - Sonia Hem
- BPMP, Montpellier University, CNRS, INRAE, Institut Agro, 34000 Montpellier, France;
| | - Jean Armengaud
- Université Paris-Saclay, CEA, INRAE, Département Médicaments et Technologies pour la Santé (DMTS), SPI, 30200 Bagnols-sur-Cèze, France;
| | - Emilie Brotin
- ImpedanCELL Platform, Federative Structure 4206 ICORE, NormandieUniv, UNICAEN, Inserm U1086 ANTICIPE, Biology and Innovative Therapeutics for Ovarian Cancers Group (BioTICLA), Comprehensive Cancer Center F. Baclesse, 14000 Caen, France;
| | - Siamak Haghdoost
- UMR6252 CIMAP, Team Applications in Radiobiology with Accelerated Ions, CEA-CNRS-ENSICAEN-Université de Caen Normandie, 14000 Caen, France; (A.G.); (C.L.); (S.H.)
| | - Diana Savu
- Department of Life and Environmental Physics, HoriaHulubei National Institute of Physics and Nuclear Engineering, 077125 Magurele, Romania; (M.T.); (M.T.); (D.S.)
| | - François Chevalier
- UMR6252 CIMAP, Team Applications in Radiobiology with Accelerated Ions, CEA-CNRS-ENSICAEN-Université de Caen Normandie, 14000 Caen, France; (A.G.); (C.L.); (S.H.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +33-(0)231-454-564
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Chevalier F, Hamdi DH, Lepleux C, Temelie M, Nicol A, Austry JB, Lesueur P, Vares G, Savu D, Nakajima T, Saintigny Y. High LET Radiation Overcomes In Vitro Resistance to X-Rays of Chondrosarcoma Cell Lines. Technol Cancer Res Treat 2020; 18:1533033819871309. [PMID: 31495269 PMCID: PMC6732854 DOI: 10.1177/1533033819871309] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Chondrosarcomas are malignant tumors of the cartilage that are chemoresistant and
radioresistant to X-rays. This restricts the treatment options essential to surgery. In
this study, we investigated the sensitivity of chondrosarcoma to X-rays and C-ions
in vitro. The sensitivity of 4 chondrosarcoma cell lines (SW1353,
CH2879, OUMS27, and L835) was determined by clonogenic survival assays and cell cycle
progression. In addition, biomarkers of DNA damage responses were analyzed in the SW1353
cell line. Chondrosarcoma cells showed a heterogeneous sensitivity toward irradiation.
Chondrosarcoma cell lines were more sensitive to C-ions exposure compared to X-rays. Using
D10 values, the relative biological effectiveness of C-ions was higher (relative
biological effectiveness = 5.5) with cells resistant to X-rays (CH2879) and lower
(relative biological effectiveness = 3.7) with sensitive cells (L835). C-ions induced more
G2 phase blockage and micronuclei in SW1353 cells as compared to X-rays with the same
doses. Persistent unrepaired DNA damage was also higher following C-ions irradiation.
These results indicate that chondrosarcoma cell lines displayed a heterogeneous response
to conventional radiation treatment; however, treatment with C-ions irradiation was more
efficient in killing chondrosarcoma cells, compared to X-rays.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francois Chevalier
- 1 CEA GANIL, Caen, France.,2 Horia Hulubei National Institute of Physics and Nuclear Engineering, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Dounia Houria Hamdi
- 1 CEA GANIL, Caen, France.,2 Horia Hulubei National Institute of Physics and Nuclear Engineering, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Charlotte Lepleux
- 1 CEA GANIL, Caen, France.,2 Horia Hulubei National Institute of Physics and Nuclear Engineering, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Mihaela Temelie
- 1 CEA GANIL, Caen, France.,2 Horia Hulubei National Institute of Physics and Nuclear Engineering, Bucharest, Romania.,3 Centre Paul Strauss, Strasbourg, Alsace, France
| | - Anaïs Nicol
- 3 Centre Paul Strauss, Strasbourg, Alsace, France
| | | | - Paul Lesueur
- 4 Centre Francois Baclesse Centre de Lutte Contre le Cancer, Caen, France
| | - Guillaume Vares
- 5 Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology, Kunigami-gun, Okinawa, Japan
| | - Diana Savu
- 2 Horia Hulubei National Institute of Physics and Nuclear Engineering, Bucharest, Romania
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
|
4
|
Bouyon-Monteau A, Habrand JL, Datchary J, Alapetite C, Bolle S, Dendale R, Feuvret L, Helfre S, Calugaru V, Cosset JM, Bey P. [Is proton beam therapy the future of radiotherapy? Part I: clinical aspects]. Cancer Radiother 2010; 14:727-38. [PMID: 20427218 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2010.01.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2009] [Revised: 01/16/2010] [Accepted: 01/21/2010] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Proton beam therapy uses positively charged particles, protons, whose physical properties improve dose-distribution (Bragg peak characterized by a sharp distal and lateral penumbra) compared with conventional photon-based radiation therapy (X-ray). These ballistic advantages apply to the treatment of deep-sited tumours located close to critical structures and requiring high-dose levels. [60-250 MeV] proton-beam therapy is now widely accepted as the "gold standard" in specific indications in adults--ocular melanoma, chordoma and chondrosarcoma of the base of skull --and is regarded as a highly promising treatment modality in the treatment of paediatric malignancies (brain tumours, sarcomas…). This includes the relative sparing of surrounding normal organs from low and mid-doses that can cause deleterious side-effects such as radiation-induced secondary malignancies. Other clinical studies are currently testing proton beam in dose-escalation evaluations, in prostate, lung, hepatocellular cancers, etc. Clinical validation of these new indications appears necessary. To date, over 60,000 patients worldwide have received part or all of their radiation therapy program by proton beams, in approximately 30 treatment facilities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Bouyon-Monteau
- Centre de protonthérapie d'Orsay, institut Curie, campus universitaire, bâtiment 101, 91898 Orsay cedex, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Habrand JL, Bolle S, Datchary J, Alapetite C, Petras S, Helfre S, Feuvret L, Calugaru V, De Marzi L, Bouyon-Monteau A, Dendale R, Kalifa C, Grill J, Doz F. La protonthérapie en radiothérapie pédiatrique. Cancer Radiother 2009; 13:550-5. [DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2009.07.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2009] [Revised: 06/29/2009] [Accepted: 07/01/2009] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
6
|
Sevret P, Magné N, Chargari C, Beaudré A, Ferrand R, Habrand JL. [An original contention system for hadron therapy]. Cancer Radiother 2009; 13:161-3. [PMID: 19297227 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2009.01.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2008] [Revised: 12/24/2008] [Accepted: 01/15/2009] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
In hadron therapy centers that have only fixed horizontal beams (i.e. most carbon ions centers and protons centers of first generation), the angulations of the beam remain technically limited, especially for the treatment of children under general anaesthesia with posterior-oblique (40 degrees or so) beams in supine position. We have been developing recently an original positioning system allowing for treatment with posterior-oblique beams, either from right or left directions, by keeping the child in the adequate position.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Sevret
- Département de radiothérapie, institut Gustave-Roussy, 94805 Villejuif, France.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Jereczek-Fossa BA, Krengli M, Orecchia R. Particle beam radiotherapy for head and neck tumors: radiobiological basis and clinical experience. Head Neck 2006; 28:750-60. [PMID: 16804876 DOI: 10.1002/hed.20448] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Head and neck tumors are often located near critical organs, making it impossible to deliver a dose of conventional radiotherapy high enough to eradicate the disease. Our aim was to review the potential benefits and available clinical experience of particle beam therapy (hadrontherapy) in the treatment of these tumors. METHODS A review of the literature was carried out through a MEDLINE search (publications between 1980 and 2005). RESULTS A review of the available clinical data shows that particle beam therapy can offer several radiobiological and physical advantages over conventional photon radiotherapy: improved dose distribution permits dose escalation within the target and optimal sparing of normal tissue. Preclinical and clinical studies suggest that there may be benefits to using hadrontherapy for tumors characterized by poor radiosensitivity and critical location. At present, the most used hadrons are protons and, as yet on an experimental basis, carbon ions. It is now well accepted that there are certain indications for using proton therapy for skull base tumors (chordoma and chondrosarcoma), paranasal sinus carcinomas, selected nasopharyngeal tumors, and neutron/ion therapy for salivary gland carcinomas (in particular, adenoid cystic tumors). Its viability in other cases, such as locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma, melanoma, soft tissue sarcoma, and bone sarcoma, is still under investigation. CONCLUSIONS Hadrontherapy can be beneficial in the treatment of tumors characterized by poor radiosensitivity and critical location. Further clinical and radiobiological studies are warranted for improved selection of patient population.
Collapse
|
8
|
Mazeron JJ, Noel G, Feuvret L, Calugaru V, Racadot S. Clinical complementarities between proton and carbon therapies. Radiother Oncol 2005; 73 Suppl 2:S50-2. [PMID: 15971309 DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(04)80013-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
Protons are characterised by low LET, but compared with photons and electrons have an improved physical depth dose distribution. Some indications for protons, i.e., ocular melanoma, chordoma and chondrosarcoma of the base of skull or cervical spine, are now accepted by the radiation oncology community as the treatment of choice. Others are still under evaluation, e.g. meningioma, locally advanced nasopharynx tumours, paediatric tumours. Neutrons have the biological advantage of a high LET, but their distribution of dose is in most cases suboptimal. Despite this, there are radiobiological arguments leading to expect that neutrons might be of some benefit in patients with tumours that are resistant to photons, slowly growing or containing a high proportion of hypoxic cells. There is some clinical evidence or rationale for a potential high LET advantage for locally extensive (I think that the current (jargon) word is extended in English..) salivary gland tumours, locally extensive(extended) prostate carcinoma, slowly growing inoperable soft tissue sarcoma, adenocarcinoma, adenoid cystic carcinoma of the paranasal sinuses, melanoma and rectal carcinoma. Light ions combine the high LET advantage of neutrons and the improved physical depth dose distribution of protons. The opportunity offered by an optimised distribution of dose should open a new era for high-LET particles, especially in deeply situated x-ray resistant tumours, where the use of neutron beams was restricted by the low quality of their depth-dose profiles. Preliminary results are encouraging.
Collapse
|