Monteggia fractures in adults. Review of 54 cases

Early revision of Monteggia-variant fractures

PURPOSE

Monteggia-variant fractures involve a fracture of the proximal ulna combined with a radiocapitellar dislocation and/or additional injuries to the radial head. These injuries are associated with severe outcomes, high complication rates, and frequent need for revision surgery. This study aimed to investigate strategies for early revision following failed operative treatment of these injuries.

METHODS

We retrospectively included all patients over 18 years of age who underwent revision surgery within the first 3 months after failed initial treatment of a Monteggia-variant fracture due to persistent instability or mechanical failure between October 2013 and December 2018 at our institution. We reviewed the reasons for revision, the operative strategies used, and the clinical and radiological outcomes of these patients.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven patients, with a mean age of 57.9 ± 17 years (range: 21-94 years), were included in the study. Nineteen patients (70.4%) underwent revision due to instability, and 10 patients (37%) underwent revision due to failed osteosynthesis. For the revisions, the collateral ligaments were reconstructed in 63% (n = 17), a radial head prosthesis was implanted in 51.9% (n = 14), and re-osteosynthesis of the ulna and additional osteosynthesis were performed in 40.7% (n = 11) and 29.6% (n = 8), respectively. The coronoid was reconstructed in 22.2% (n = 6), and a radial head resection was performed in 14.8% (n = 4). In three cases, total elbow arthroplasty was performed, and in six cases, an additional external fixator was applied. All reconstructive procedures successfully stabilized the elbow. The mean functional arc for extension-flexion at final follow-up was 79 ± 29° (range: 20-115°).

CONCLUSIONS

Common reasons for revision surgery in Monteggia-variant fractures include ulnohumeral or radiohumeral instability, often due to missed coronoid fractures, collateral ligament injuries, or absence of the radial head.

Ulnar osteotomy and monolateral external fixator for the treatment of chronic Monteggia fractures in children: comparison between gradual and acute radial head reduction

This study evaluated the outcomes of chronic Monteggia fractures (CMFs) treated by ulnar osteotomy and monolateral external fixator (MEF), and compare the outcome of gradual versus acute radial head reduction. Two groups of patients were identified. Group 1: gradual reduction of the radial head ( n = 13); group 2: acute reduction ( n = 6). Clinical outcome was evaluated by Kim Elbow Score, whereas radiographic outcome was assessed on plain radiographs. The effect of age, side, time from initial trauma to surgery, rate of unplanned surgery, amount of angulation and lengthening, and final outcome were evaluated. Univariate analysis was performed to identify factors associated with good radiographic outcome. Thirteen patients underwent gradual correction of the ulna. The mean duration of correction was 43.4 days (range, 21-82); the mean angulation and lengthening of the ulna were 22.8° (range, 0°-35°) and 22.2 mm (range, 12.2-40.9), respectively. Six patients underwent acute reduction intraoperatively, the mean angulation and lengthening of the ulna were 17.2° (range, 4°-33.9°) and 5.2 mm (range, 2.5-12.2), respectively. CMF treated by ulnar osteotomy and gradual distraction had better radiological outcome (Group 1; 92.3% 12/13) than those treated by acute reduction of the radial head (Group 2; 3/6, 50%) ( P = 0.071). Reoperation rate was found to be significantly correlated with a fair or poor radiographic results ( P = 0.016). Good clinical and radiological outcomes should be expected in CMF patients treated by gradual lengthening and angulation of the ulna with a MEF.

Monteggia fractures and Monteggia-like-lesions: a systematic review

Monteggia injuries are rare, but severe injuries of the elbow including various injury patterns. Treatment of these injuries is still topic of debate and strategies differ widely. In this systematic review on Monteggia injuries in adults, we aimed to clarify the incidence of different injury patterns within Monteggia injuries, investigate the main reasons leading to revision surgery and explore which surgical treatments should be favored to achieve satisfactory clinical results.We initially identified 182 publications and ultimately included 17 retrospective studies comprising 651 cases. All patients were classified using the Bado classification, leading to 30.5% Bado type I fractures, 60.4% type II fractures, 5.1% type III and 3.1% type IV fractures. Mean revision rate was 23%. Ulna non-union (28%) and limited range-of-motion (22%) are the main reasons for revision surgery. Meta-analysis shows a trend toward the use of locking plates for ulna fixation which may lead to less revision surgery and fewer ulna non-unions. Further biomechanical and clinical research is necessary to clarify the role of radial head surgery.

To Angulate or Not to Angulate the Ulna during the Progressive Distraction Period Performed with a Monolateral External Fixator in Paediatric Patients with a Chronic Monteggia Fracture?

Background and Objectives: The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical and radiographic evolution of chronic Monteggia fractures (CMFs) treated by ulnar osteotomy and monolateral external fixators (MEFs) with or without angulation of the ulna during the distraction period. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study evaluated 20 children (14 boys and 6 girls) with CMFs. According to the strategy of ulnar lengthening, two groups of patients were identified: patients undergoing gradual lengthening with (Group A, n = 11) or without ulna angulation (Group B, n = 9). The mean age at the time of surgery was 7.7 years old (range, 5.4−12.9). The mean time from initial trauma to surgery was 26.3 months (range, 1−96), and the mean follow-up was 24.6 months (range, 5.5−45.4). Clinical outcomes were evaluated by Kim et al.’s Elbow Performance Score, while radiographic outcomes were assessed on plain radiographs. Results: Age at surgery, sex, laterality, time between trauma and surgery, and time of follow up in the two groups of patients showed no significant differences. The radial head was successfully reduced in 9 of 9 and 10 of 11 patients in Groups B and A, respectively (p = 1.00). The mean time to achieve radial head reduction was shorter in Group B (18.1 ± 5.3 days) than in Group A (39.2 ± 18.7 days; p = 0.004). The mean angulation of the ulna at the end of treatment was significantly lower in Group B (0.6° ± 1.1°) than in Group A (25.9° ± 6.3°; p < 0.0001). The average ulnar lengthening at the end of treatment in Group B (14.1 ± 5.8 mm) was, on average, 7.7 mm less than that in Group A (21.8 ± 9.7 mm; p = 0.05). The Kim et al. Elbow Performance Score at the last follow-up visit was comparable between the two groups of patients (p = 1.00). Conclusions: A shorter time to achieve radial head reduction and less deformity of the ulna can be expected in paediatric patients with CMFs undergoing intraoperative restoration of ulnar alignment and gradual lengthening without angulation postoperatively.

Monteggia-like lesions in adults treated with radial head arthroplasty-mid-term follow-up of 27 cases

Background

The aim of the study was to analyze the functional and radiological outcome of Monteggia-like lesions in adults with unreconstructible fracture of the radial head and treatment with radial head arthroplasty.

Methods

Twenty-seven patients (mean age 56 years; range 36 to 79 years) with a Monteggia-like lesion and treatment with radial head replacement were included in this retrospective study. Minimum follow-up was 2 years. Clinical assessment included the pain level with the visual analog scale in rest (VAS_R) and under pressure (VAS_P), range of motion, Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), and Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score (DASH). A detailed radiological evaluation was performed. Complications and revisions were also analyzed.

Results

After a mean follow-up period of 69 months (range, 24 to 170) the mean DASH score was 30 ± 24, the MEPS averaged 77 ± 20 points, the mean VAS_R was 2.1 ± 2.4, and VAS_P was 4.5 ± 3.5. Mean loss of extension was 24° ± 18 and flexion was 124° ± 20. Heterotopic ossifications were noted in 12 patients (44%). A total of 17 complications were noted in 11 patients (41%), leading to 15 revision surgeries in 9 patients (33%). Patients with a complicated postoperative course showed a worse clinical outcome compared with patients without complications measured by MEPS (68 ± 22 vs. 84 ± 16), DASH (49 ± 16 vs. 20 ± 22) and ulnohumeral motion (77° ± 31 vs. 117° ± 23).

Conclusions

Monteggia-like lesions with unreconstructible radial head fracture and treatment with radial head replacement are prone to complications and revisions.

Monteggia fractures in adults

Monteggia fractures are part of a spectrum of forearm injuries and commonly result either from a fall on the outstretched arm with forced pronation or from a direct injury. An understanding of the mechanism of injury and an appropriate clinical examination followed by operative intervention is the basis of present day good practice. This paper reviews the literature and presents a contemporary overview of the Monteggia fracture in adults.

EPIDEMIOLOGY AND TREATMENT OF MONTEGGIA LESION IN ADULTS: SERIES OF 44 CASES

Objective:

To analyze the epidemiology, treatment and outcome of a series of adult patients with Monteggia lesion treated in Uruguayan institutions.

Methods:

This is a retrospective article, we retrospectively identified from two Uruguayan institutions 44 adult patients with Monteggia lesion and analyzed their characteristics including Bado classification, associated injuries, treatment modality and outcome (Morrey score).

Results:

Using Bado classification, 23 cases (52%) were type II, 12 (27%) type I, seven (16%) type IV and two cases (5%) type III. Associated lesions were radial head fractures, found in 15 patients, coronoid ipsilateral fractures in seven patients, and neurological injuries in four. Radial head dislocation was reduced in 93% of the cases with closed maneuvers. Ulna fractures underwent open reduction and internal fixation in all 30 cases using 3.5 mm DCP plates. Complications after surgery occurred in 21 cases. Revision surgery was done in 15 cases. Outcomes after primary and revision surgery were good or excellent in 37 cases.

Conclusions:

In our series we observed that Monteggia lesion in adults is a serious injury with a high number of complications that often require revision surgeries. Level of Evidence IV, Retrospective Study, Case Series.

Radial Head Subluxation After Malalignment of the Proximal Ulna: A Biomechanical Study

OBJECTIVES

Understanding the anatomy of proximal ulna is important when treating complex injuries, since nonanatomic reconstruction may lead to malunion, arthrosis, and instability. The proximal ulna has a sagittal bow, termed the proximal ulna dorsal angulation (PUDA). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the magnitude of angular malalignment at the PUDA that would lead to radial head subluxation.

METHODS

This biomechanical study was conducted on 6 fresh frozen upper extremities with an elbow movement simulator. An osteotomy was performed at the PUDA and stabilized with internal fixation at 5 angles. Lateral elbow fluoroscopic images were taken in 4 elbow and 3 forearm positions, with the annular ligament intact and then released. The displacement of the radial head was quantified with the radiocapitellar ratio measurement.

RESULTS

A significant interaction exists between elbow positions, angles of malalignment, and annular ligament integrity (P < 0.001). The greatest magnitudes of radial head subluxation were with annular ligament tear, ranging from -4% to 88% (P < 0.001). Significant differences were found between the different internal fixation angles (P = 0.002) and elbow positions (P < 0.001). Anterior subluxation increased as malalignment was fixed into extension and with progressive elbow flexion. Posterior subluxation increased as malalignment advanced into flexion and decreased with elbow flexion.

CONCLUSIONS

Proximal ulna malalignment combined with an annular ligament tear affect the biomechanics of the elbow and can lead to radial head subluxation. This study demonstrates the importance of an anatomic reconstruction, specifically recreation of each individual's unique PUDA. Thus, in the setting of a comminuted proximal ulna fracture with associated annular ligament insufficiency, radiographs of the contralateral elbow may assist with the restoration of the normal anatomy to limit radial head instability.

Clinical usefulness of proximal ulnar and radial fracture-dislocation comprehensive classification system (PURCCS): prospective study of 39 cases

BACKGROUND

Complex fracture-dislocations of the proximal ulna and radius represent a challenge even for expert orthopaedic surgeons. A new comprehensive classification, the proximal ulnar and radial fracture-dislocation comprehensive classification system (PURCCS), was recently proposed. The aim of this study was to analyze the clinical usefulness of this classification in a large series of patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We studied 38 patients (39 elbows) with a mean age of 56 years. All patients were classified with the PURCCS by use of standard radiography, computed tomography, and intraoperative fluoroscopy. Surgical treatment was performed according to the PURCCS therapeutic algorithm. Patients were followed up for a mean of 23 months. The clinical evaluation was performed with the Mayo Elbow Performance Score and Index (MEPS and MEPI); the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score; and the modified American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (m-ASES) score.

RESULTS

Each pattern of fracture-dislocation in our series finds its position within the PURCCS. At the last follow-up, the mean MEPS, DASH score, and m-ASES score were 91.2, 14.9, and 83.9, respectively. The mean extension, flexion, pronation, and supination were 19°, 136°, 81°, and 79°, respectively. According to the MEPI, 72%, 20%, and 8% of cases were rated excellent, good, and fair, respectively. Two patients with elbow stiffness underwent a reoperation, with final satisfactory results.

CONCLUSION

The PURCCS helps identify the main lesions of each injury pattern; the associated therapeutic algorithm helps select correct surgical strategies. This study showed that the clinical results were satisfactory in the majority of cases, with few major complications and reinterventions. The PURCCS is a comprehensive classification that may contribute to the surgical management of these difficult fracture-dislocations.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, case series, treatment study.

Complex fracture-dislocations of the proximal ulna and radius in adults: a comprehensive classification

BACKGROUND

Complex fracture-dislocations of the proximal ulna and radius include multiple anatomic lesions, the management of which is known to be demanding. Although several classifications have been proposed, none appear to be exhaustive, and most of them have neither therapeutic nor prognostic value. The purpose of this study was to design a comprehensive classification that may provide a guide for the operative management of these injuries.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The classification is aimed at identifying definite anatomic lesions, called the "main lesions," the presence of which can affect the prognosis and require peculiar treatments. The main lesions include (1) ulnar fracture (including its location with respect to the insertion of collateral ligaments and coronoid fracture), (2) radiohumeral dislocation, (3) proximal radioulnar dislocation, (4) radial fracture, (5) distal radioulnar joint and interosseous membrane lesion, and (6) humeral-ulnar dislocation. Intraobserver and interobserver reliability was assessed in 25 complex fracture-dislocations. Standard radiographs and computed tomography scans were analyzed by 3 independent observers.

RESULTS

The main lesions were labeled by an alphanumeric system. Numbers 1 through 6 identified the type of ulnar fracture, and letters A through E indicated the dislocated joint or presence of a radial fracture. The direction of dislocation and the type of radial fracture were identified by Roman numerals, from I to III, placed after the letter. A κ value of 0.873 or greater resulted from intraobserver and interobserver evaluation.

CONCLUSION

We created a comprehensive classification of complex fracture-dislocations of the elbow. The classification appeared to be reproducible and may represent a useful tool for the management of such difficult injuries.

Bilateral Monteggia fracture in adults

INTRODUCTION

In 1814 Giovanni Monteggia first described two cases of fractures of the proximal third of ulna with dislocation of the radial head. These fractures are more common in children than in adults, and mutual Monteggia fracture is a rare complication. This study presents a treatment course of a patient with bilateral Monteggia fracture.

CASE REPORT

A 55-year-old patient was injured by falling in the yard. Radiography showed bilateral Monteggia fracture type II (by the Badon classification). Operative treatment of fracture was done by a compression plate on the right side and by the zuggurtung technique on the left one. Closed repositioning of the radial head was done on both sides. The patient was wearing a plaster splint for the upper arm for 21 days. After removing the fixation, the function of the elbow was determined by the Broberg Morrey score (BM) which was on the right side 45.5 and on the left side 47.5. After the proper physical therapy, four months after the surgery, BM score was 100 on the right side, and 93 on the left one.

CONCLUSION

Surgical treatment and early rehabilitation is the key for the return of good function of both elbows.

Long-term evaluation of surgically treated anterior monteggia fractures in skeletally mature patients

PURPOSE

The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate the functional and radiological long-term outcome of open reduction and internal fixation of skeletally mature patients with a Bado type 1 Monteggia fracture.

METHODS

We identified 11 consecutive skeletally mature patients who had surgical treatment of an anterior (Bado type 1) Monteggia fracture. Long-term evaluation at a median of 20 years after injury (range, 7-34 years) was compared with an early evaluation at a median of 13 months after injury (range, 11-32 months). The early and long-term results were evaluated radiographically and according to the system of Broberg and Morrey. The long-term result was also evaluated according to the Mayo Elbow Performance Index, the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, and the Disabilities of the Arm Should and Hand scores.

RESULTS

Two patients had subsequent surgery to address a nonunion and 3 elbows had radiographic signs of arthrosis. The mean arc of elbow flexion increased from 110 degrees (range, 35 degrees to 140 degrees) at early follow-up to 120 degrees (range, 40 degrees to 150 degrees) at late follow-up. The mean arc of forearm rotation increased from 145 degrees (range, 90 degrees to 180 degrees) to 149 degrees (range, 90 degrees to 180 degrees). The mean Broberg and Morrey score increased from 89 points (range, 62-100 points) to 94 points (range, 76-100 points). The median DASH score was 7 points (range, 0-34 points) at long-term follow-up. There was no statistical difference between early and late range of motion or Broberg and Morrey score.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of open reduction and internal fixation of anterior Monteggia fractures in skeletally mature patients are maintained over long-term follow-up.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic IV.

Monteggia and Monteggia-like-lesions: Classification, Indication, and Techniques in Operative Treatment

Monteggia fractures consist of an ulna fracture accompanied by radial head dislocation. Such fractures are easily overlooked due to the prominence of the ulna fracture. Earlier studies have reported on the results of treating Monteggia fractures in children and adults even though this type of fracture is different in these two patient populations. As such they should be considered as separate entities due to the different injury pattern, the prognosis, and the preferred method of treatment. For a good postoperative result, an early detection of the Monteggia dislocation, an efficient operative treatment of the ulna fracture, and reposition of the radial head are essential. The goal of reconstruction is an early mobilization within a stable arc of motion. Here, we provide an overview of the classification of Monteggia fractures, the mechanism of injury, and treatment options with the aim of providing sufficient information to reduce the possibility of underestimating forearm injuries in adults.

Monteggia fractures in adults: long-term results and prognostic factors

The objective of this retrospective study was to correlate the Bado and Jupiter classifications with long-term results after operative treatment of Monteggia fractures in adults and to determine prognostic factors for functional outcome. Of 63 adult patients who sustained a Monteggia fracture in a ten-year period, 47 were available for follow-up after a mean time of 8.4 years (5 to 14). According to the Broberg and Morrey elbow scale, 22 patients (47%) had excellent, 12 (26%) good, nine (19%) fair and four (8%) poor results at the last follow-up. A total of 12 patients (26%) needed a second operation within 12 months of the initial operation. The mean Broberg and Morrey score was 87.2 (45 to 100) and the mean DASH score was 17.4 (0 to 70). There was a significant correlation between the two scores (p = 0.01). The following factors were found to be correlated with a poor clinical outcome: Bado type II fracture, Jupiter type IIa fracture, fracture of the radial head, coronoid fracture, and complications requiring further surgery. Bado type II Monteggia fractures, and within this group, Jupiter type IIa fractures, are frequently associated with fractures of the radial head and the coronoid process, and should be considered as negative prognostic factors for functional long-term outcome. Patients with these types of fracture should be informed about the potential risk of functional deficits and the possible need for further surgery.

Monteggia Fractures and Variants: Review of Distribution and Nine Irreducible Radial Head Dislocations

One hundred and twenty one cases of Monteggia fractures (68) and Monteggia fracture equivalent variant transolecranon fracture dislocations (53) in adults were reviewed to determine the frequency of Bado types and the occurrences of irreducible radial head dislocations. The distribution of Monteggia fractures was 53 Bado type I, two Bado type II, eight Bado type III, and five Bado type IV. Nine (13%) irreducible radial head dislocations were encountered (8 in Bado type I fractures and one in Bado type IV), including an unreported occurrence of biceps tendon interposition. The distribution in the Monteggia variants was 35 Bado type I, 14 Bado type II, one Bado type III, and two Bado type IV, without any irreducible radial heads. The present study demonstrates a greater preponderance of Bado type I than any other type among adult Monteggia fractures.

Does a Monteggia variant lesion result in a poor functional outcome?: A retrospective study

We retrospectively reviewed the clinical and functional outcomes after operative fixation of ipsilateral fractures of the proximal ulna, radial head or neck, and radial head dislocation (Monteggia variant). Twenty of 25 patients who sustained this injury returned for followup at a mean of 2.3 years and were evaluated by an independent examiner. Radiographically, 17 of 20 fractures united after the index surgery. The three patients who had nonunions develop had Bado Type 2 fracture patterns. The fractures of two patients united after revision internal fixation, and bone grafting. Seven patients had heterotopic ossification develop and 14 of 20 patients had arthritic changes develop. The mean Broberg and Morrey score was 79.1 (range, 32.5-100) and the mean disability of the arm, shoulder and hand score was 64.1 (worse outcome than the general population). Eight of 20 patients required revision surgery (three for recurrent instability, three for nonunion of the ulna, one for radial head excision and hardware removal, and one for hardware removal alone). Nine of 20 patients had fair or poor outcomes according to the Broberg and Morrey scale. Physicians should counsel patients that functional impairment is common after these complex high-energy injuries.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic study, Level IV (case series). See the Guideline for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Monteggia-Verletzungen im Erwachsenenalter

BACKGROUND

Complications, revision surgery, and unsatisfactory functional results after operative management of Monteggia fractures are frequent. Moreover, hardly any studies exist that deal exclusively with the therapeutic concept for adults.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between January 1988 and December 2001, 68 patients with Monteggia fractures or equivalent injury were surgically treated. A total of 49 patients could be followed up after 83 months (25-176). Fracture type was assessed according to Bado's classification, functional results according to the Mayo elbow performance score, and the extent of osteoarthritis based on the criteria of Baird and Johnson.

RESULTS

The median age of the follow-up patients was 38 years (18-89, 31 men, 18 women). Corresponding to Bado's classification the following injuries were observed: 18 cases of type 1, 22 of type 2, 5 of type 3, and 4 cases of type 4. After surgical intervention, 14 patients achieved "very good", 21 "good", 9 "satisfactory", and 5 "poor" results. Of the 14 patients with either "satisfactory" or "poor" results, 9 manifested a type 2 injury. Complications requiring revision surgery occurred in 14 patients and complications not requiring revision in another 14. Severe osteoarthritic changes in the humeral or radioulnar joint were observed in 4 cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Monteggia fractures in adults are fraught with complications despite good functional results in the majority of cases. The patient should be made aware early on of the risk of residual functional deficits and the need for further surgical intervention.