Left ventricular aneurysmectomy: A comparison of linear and circular repairs

Left Ventricular Reconstruction by Modified Linear Technique with Absorbable Suture

BACKGROUND

Linear and endoventricular techniques of left ventricular (LV) reconstruction often utilise prosthetic material for epicardial reinforcement or endocardial patch. We report a technique of LV aneurysm repair using absorbable suture without prosthetic material.

METHODS

Between November 1999 and August 2004, 55 patients underwent linear LV reconstruction, for ischaemic cardiomyopathy, using only continuous 3/0 polydioxanone suture. Survival, functional class and echocardiographic outcomes are reported.

RESULTS

Fifty-two patients (mean age 64+/-10 years) were studied. There was no perioperative mortality and the Kaplan-Meier survival at five years was 81%. Fifty-one patients underwent postoperative follow up (mean 28 months) with echocardiography (mean 20 months). There were no recurrent aneurysms. The postoperative LV eccentricity index (EI) was 0.72 (CI 0.48-0.9). Mean LV ejection fraction increased from 0.33+/-0.09 preoperatively to 0.41+/-0.15 at late follow up (mean within patient change 0.08+/-0.15, p=0.003). Mean symptom class improved from 3.3+/-0.8 to 1.6+/-0.7 (mean within patient improvement 1.6+/-1.0, p<0.001). Mitral regurgitation of grade 2/4 was identified in six patients and grade 3/4 in one patient.

CONCLUSION

Linear repair with absorbable suture material and without prosthetic material may be safely undertaken with good early and mid-term results.

Surgery of left ventricular aneurysm: a meta-analysis of early outcomes following different reconstruction techniques

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study is to assess the effects of linear and geometric left ventricular aneurysm reconstruction on early postoperative outcomes.

METHODS

A search of computerized databases supplemented with manual bibliographic review was performed for all peer-reviewed English language publications concerning randomized and nonrandomized studies reporting the results of left ventricular reconstruction after both linear and geometric reconstruction techniques. Meta-analyses of several short-term outcomes were performed.

RESULTS

No randomized trial was identified. Eighteen nonrandomized trials were found with a total of 1,814 and 803 patients who underwent linear and geometric reconstruction, respectively. Meta-analysis of all studies (n = 18) revealed an increased risk of in-hospital death for patients undergoing linear reconstruction (relative risk = 1.59, 95% confidence interval: 1.12 to 2.26, p = 0.01). The subanalysis of studies in which linear reconstruction was adopted mainly in the first period of time, and geometric reconstruction was adopted in a later phase, still showed a significant advantage in terms of in-hospital mortality for patients undergoing geometric reconstruction (n = 11 studies, relative risk = 1.89, 95% confidence interval: 1.22 to 2.93, p = 0.004). By contrast, when the two surgical approaches were carried out in the same time lag, there was no difference between linear and geometric reconstruction techniques (n = 7 studies, relative risk = 1.04, 95% confidence interval: 0.57 to 1.92, p = 0.89). No differences in the other outcomes of interest were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

The advantage for geometric reconstruction techniques in terms of in-hospital mortality shown in some studies can be an effect of learning curve or of improvement over time in management of these difficult patients. Further studies are required to clarify this issue.