Gene therapy for peripheral arterial disease

Urokinase gene transfer augments angiogenesis in ischemic skeletal and myocardial muscle

Urokinase plasminogen activator (uPA) is required for both endogenous and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-augmented angiogenesis in normal tissues, leading us to hypothesize that uPA augmentation by gene transfer might promote angiogenesis in ischemic tissues. Overexpression of uPA was studied in rat myocardial infarction (MI) and mouse hind limb ischemia models and compared with VEGF overexpression effects. Animals were divided into control and three experimental groups (n = 6), receiving intramuscular injections of plasmids as follows: (i) control (empty vector or expressing beta-galactosidase); (ii) uPA; (iii) VEGF(165); (iv) a 1:1 mixture of uPA and VEGF(165). The capillary densities in both ischemic models were greater (P < 0.05) in tissues treated with uPA, VEGF, or a combination of both than in controls. Infarct size was reduced in hearts from uPA and VEGF experimental groups compared with controls (P < 0.05). Local overexpression of uPA induced a marked increase in the number of macrophages and myofibroblasts present within infarcts. Hind limb blood flow was greater in all experimental groups by day 10 (P < 0.05). Overall, the effects of uPA and VEGF were uniformly comparable. Additional analysis revealed association of local edema with VEGF but not with uPA treatment. This study established that uPA gene therapy effectively induces functionally significant angiogenesis in models of acute MI and hind limb ischemia.

Gene therapy of the ischemic lower limb--Therapeutic angiogenesis

The limitations of surgical revascularisation and pharmacological treatment in peripheral arterial occlusive disease (PAOD) are well recognized. Therapeutic options for critical leg ischemia are consequently limited to percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) or surgical revascularisation. Unfortunately, many patients with critical leg ischemia are poor candidates for either procedure. Therapeutic angiogenesis is a novel promising tool to treat these patients. Experimental and clinical and trials of gene transfer for therapeutic angiogenesis have already shown some clinical efficacy. This review is focused on gene transfer techniques in preclinical and clinical therapeutic angiogenesis, angiogenic growth factors, vectors, delivery methods and routes. The results of clinical and experimental studies, safety and side effects of gene therapy, and the perspectives of future research are also discussed.

Imaging after vascular gene therapy

Targets for cardiovascular gene therapy currently include limiting restenosis after balloon angioplasty and stent placement, inhibiting vein bypass graft intimal hyperplasia/stenosis, therapeutic angiogenesis for cardiac and lower-limb ischemia, and prevention of thrombus formation. While catheter angiography is still standard method to follow-up vascular gene transfer, other modern imaging techniques, especially intravascular ultrasound (IVUS), magnetic resonance (MR), and positron emission tomography (PET) imaging provide complementary information about the therapeutic effect of vascular gene transfer in humans. Although molecular imaging of therapeutic gene expression in the vasculatures is still in its technical development phase, it has already offered basic medical science an extremely useful in vivo evaluation tool for non- or minimally invasive imaging of vascular gene therapy.

Clinical gene therapy for nonmalignant disease

Gene therapy is envisioned as a potentially definitive treatment for a variety of diseases that have a genetic etiology. We reviewed trials of clinical gene therapy for nonmalignant, single-gene, and multifactorial disorders and infectious diseases, and found limited evidence suggesting that gene therapy may benefit patients who have severe, combined, immunodeficiency disorder; cystic fibrosis; coronary artery disease or peripheral arterial disease; or hemophilia. Effective gene therapy requires the targeted transfer of exogenous genetic material into human cells and the subsequent regulated expression of the corresponding gene product. Because no phase 3 randomized controlled trials have been completed that fulfill these criteria, it is difficult to correlate signs of clinical benefit with the administration of gene therapy in any disease. Additional clinical and basic research is needed to determine the future role of gene therapy.