Discovery, innovation and the cyclical nature of the pharmaceutical business

A Multifaceted Perspective of Pharmaceutical Innovation: A Consideration of the Regulatory Role

BACKGROUND

The pace of innovation, the creative engine of the pharmaceutical industry, has been variably described as stagnant, stable, or accelerating depending on the metric used for assessment or the quality of evidence. If the predominant perception holds that the speed of innovation is sluggish, pressure for changes in the regulatory environment intensifies.

METHODS

A systematic evaluation of the course of innovation in this industry was performed by applying a formula derived from economic market share theory to estimate the innovative contribution of each new molecular entity approved since 1938. The total and average innovation scores per year are described based on the therapeutic class, mechanism, and drug target. These data are compared to the number and percent of first-in-class drugs per year.

RESULTS

The average annual score based on therapeutic class novelty has been declining; however, the therapeutic class total innovation score has been stable since the mid-1970s with occasional significant peaks of activity. While the average score based on mechanism or target experienced a decline beginning in the 1950s and 1960s, it has begun to rise since the early 1990s. Notably, the total innovation score has steadily increased since the 1970s. These variations closely parallel the number of first-in-class drugs approved on an annual basis.

CONCLUSIONS

While the reasons underlying these activities are likely complex, there is a temporal association between regulatory efforts to expedite drug development and approval. These findings should be considered when considering future incentivizing regulations and policies.

Entry order as a consideration for innovation strategies

Prior studies have defined an effect of market entry order on commercial success that depends on attributes of the underlying technology, the rate of change in technology improvement, consumer expectations of these attributes and the degree of unmet demand. Analyses of pharmaceutical sales data suggest that the commercial success of drugs is subject to similar forces. These findings have important implications for innovation strategies.

Is pharmaceutical R&D just a game of chance or can strategy make a difference?

The pharmaceutical industry is currently experiencing turbulent, yet exciting times. Despite widely expressed negative sentiments regarding productivity there are now signs that innovation could yet win the day and bring a fresh wave of breakthrough drugs. Nowhere is this truer than for oncology, which previously was dominated by cytotoxic drugs. Today, however, this field shows exciting progress with the emergence of kinase inhibitors, as well as various antibody-based mechanistic approaches. Similarly, new drug mechanisms have transformed HIV therapy. Are these chance events, or have they come about through strategy? Here, we argue that a complex interplay of chance and strategy is at work in pharmaceutical R&D, separated in time by 10 years or more.

Quest for the best

By combining innovative science with years of massive investment, drug makers seek to turn newly discovered chemicals into revolutionary blockbuster drugs that generate billions of dollars in revenue. So every year, they collectively spend tens of billions of dollars on the high-risk pursuit of the next Prozac or Viagra. But should they? This article analyses key themes around differentiation that we have found to be common among blockbusters, and examines the implications for creating future billion-dollar drugs.

High-throughput cytochrome p450 inhibition assays by ultrafast gradient liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry using monolithic columns

A generic method employing ultrafast liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS/MS) was developed and employed for routine screening of drug candidates for inhibition of five major human cytochrome p450 (CYP) isozymes, CYP3A4, CYP2D6, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, and CYP1A2. The method utilized a monolithic silica rod column to allow fast flow rates to significantly reduce chromatographic run time. The major metabolites of six CYP-specific probe substrates for the five p450 isoforms were monitored and quantified to determine IC(50) values of five drug compounds against each p450 isozyme. Human liver microsomal incubation samples at each test compound concentration were combined and analyzed simultaneously by the LC/MS/MS method. Each pooled sample containing six substrates and an internal standard was separated and detected in only 24 seconds. The combination of ultrafast chromatography and sample pooling techniques has significantly increased sample throughput and shortened assay turnaround time, allowing a large number of compounds to be screened rapidly for potential p450 inhibitory activity, to aid in compound selection and optimization in drug discovery.