Hand posture modulates neuronal interaction in the primary somatosensory cortex of humans

The influence of hand posture on tactile processing: Evidence from a 7T functional magnetic resonance imaging study

Although behavioral evidence has shown that postural changes influence the ability to localize or detect tactile stimuli, little is known regarding the brain areas that modulate these effects. This 7T functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study explores the effects of touch of the hand as a function of hand location (right or left side of the body) and hand configuration (open or closed). We predicted that changes in hand configuration would be represented in contralateral primary somatosensory cortex (S1) and the anterior intraparietal area (aIPS), whereas change in position of the hand would be associated with alterations in activation in the superior parietal lobule. Multivoxel pattern analysis and a region of interest approach partially supported our predictions. Decoding accuracy for hand location was above chance level in superior parietal lobule (SPL) and in the anterior intraparietal (aIPS) area; above chance classification of hand configuration was observed in SPL and S1. This evidence confirmed the role of the parietal cortex in postural effects on touch and the possible role of S1 in coding the body form representation of the hand.

Selective interference of hand posture with grasping capability estimation

Previous studies have shown that judgments about how one would perform an action are affected by the current body posture. Hence, judging one's capability to grasp an object between index and thumb is influenced by their aperture at the time of the judgment. This finding can be explained by a modification of the internal representation of one's hand through the effect of sensorimotor input. Alternatively, the influence of grip aperture might be mediated by a response congruency effect, so that a "less" vs. "more" open grip would bias the judgment toward a "less" vs. "more" capable response. To specify the role of sensorimotor input in prospective action judgments, we asked participants to estimate their capability to grasp circles between index and thumb while performing a secondary task that requires them to squeeze a ball with these two fingers (precision grip) or with a different hand configuration (palm grip). Experiment 1 showed that participants underestimated their grasping capability when the squeezing task involved the same grip as the judged action (precision grip) and their estimates were bound to the relative size of objects as revealed by size-contrast illusions (Ebbinghaus). Experiment 2 showed that the grip reduction caused by the squeezing task also interfered with the discrimination of large numbers in magnitude judgments, but this incongruency effect was only observed for the palm grip. The dissociated effects of the two grips in graspability and numerical judgments indicate that sensorimotor input may affect the perceived ability to grasp objects, independently of response congruency, by modifying the representation of the hand in action.

Behavioural and electrophysiological evidence for the effect of target-distractor separation in a tactile search task

Evidence suggests that the N140cc component of event-related potentials (ERP) observed in tactile search tasks reflects the attentional selection of the target. Here, we investigated whether the target selection processes are affected by the separation between the target and an ipsilateral singleton distractor (singletons delivered to contiguous or non-contiguous fingers of the same hand). In addition, the external distance between search items was varied through posture (splayed or touching fingers). Accuracy improved when target and distractor were delivered to contiguous fingers that were also touching. Regardless of target-distractor separation, the N140cc was larger when the external distance between search-array stimuli decreased (touching fingers). Importantly, a smaller N140cc was observed at reduced target-distractor separations, suggesting a narrower attentional focus for contiguous singletons. These findings reveal that the mechanisms responsible for tactile target selection in the presence of an ipsilateral singleton distractor are fundamentally different from those emerged in vision.

Perceptual Distortions of 3-D Finger Size

Our body is a volumetric, three-dimensional (3-D) object in the world, and we experience it as such. Existing methods for measuring the perceptual body image, however, have been based on judgments of one-dimensional (1-D) length or two-dimensional images. We developed a new approach to the 3-D perceptual body image of the fingers by asking people to judge whether each finger would fit through rings of varying diameter. This task requires participants to conceptualize their finger as a volumetric object entering the ring. In two experiments, we used an adaptive staircase procedure to estimate the perceived size of each finger. There were systematic distortions of perceived 3-D finger size, with the size of index finger and (to a lesser extent) the middle finger underestimated. These distortions were unaffected by changes in hand posture. Notably, the pattern of distortions is qualitatively different from that found in previous research investigating 1-D finger length, suggesting that 3-D judgments of the body may differ in fundamental ways from 1-D judgments of individual body dimensions.

Hand Posture Modulates Perceived Tactile Distance

A growing literature shows that body posture modulates the perception of touch, as well as somatosensory processing more widely. In this study, I investigated the effects of changes in the internal postural configuration of the hand on the perceived distance between touches. In two experiments participants positioned their hand in two postures, with the fingers splayed (Apart posture) or pressed together (Together posture). In Experiment 1, participants made forced-choice judgments of which of two tactile distances felt bigger, one oriented with the proximal-distal hand axis (Along orientation) and one oriented with the medio-lateral hand axis (Across orientation). In Experiment 2, participants made verbal estimates of the absolute distance between a single pair of touches, in one of the two orientations. Consistent with previous results, there was a clear bias to perceive distances in the across orientation as larger than those in the along orientation. Perceived tactile distance was also modulated by posture, with increased judgments in both orientations when the fingers were splayed. These results show that changes in the internal posture of the hand modulate the perceived distance between touches on the hand, and add to a growing literature showing postural modulation of touch.

Finger posture modulates structural body representations

Patients with lesions of the left posterior parietal cortex commonly fail in identifying their fingers, a condition known as finger agnosia, yet are relatively unimpaired in sensation and skilled action. Such dissociations have traditionally been interpreted as evidence that structural body representations (BSR), such as the body structural description, are distinct from sensorimotor representations, such as the body schema. We investigated whether performance on tasks commonly used to assess finger agnosia is modulated by changes in hand posture. We used the 'in between' test in which participants estimate the number of unstimulated fingers between two touched fingers or a localization task in which participants judge which two fingers were stimulated. Across blocks, the fingers were placed in three levels of splay. Judged finger numerosity was analysed, in Exp. 1 by direct report and in Exp. 2 as the actual number of fingers between the fingers named. In both experiments, judgments were greater when non-adjacent stimulated fingers were positioned far apart compared to when they were close together or touching, whereas judgements were unaltered when adjacent fingers were stimulated. This demonstrates that BSRs are not fixed, but are modulated by the real-time physical distances between body parts.

Additive effect of simultaneously varying respiratory frequency and tidal volume on respiratory sinus arrhythmia

Our aims were to assess, in healthy young females and males, the effects of the linear joint variation of respiratory frequency (RF) and tidal volume (VT) on the logarithmic transformation of high-frequency power of RR intervals (lnHF). ECG and VT were recorded from 18 females and 20 males during three visually guided 30-s breathing maneuvers: linearly increasing RF (RFLI) at constant VT; linearly increasing VT (VTLI) followed by decreasing VT (VTLD) at fixed RF, and RFLI and VTLI-VTLD combined. VT of females was 20% smaller. Instantaneous RF and lnHF were computed from the time-frequency distributions of respiratory series and RR intervals. LnHF-RF and lnHF-VT relations were similar between genders. LnHF and RR intervals control-maneuver differences during combined maneuver were approximately equal to the sum of those of the independent maneuvers. LnHF-RFLI relation showed strong negative correlations in separated and combined conditions, with steeper slope in the latter (p < 0.001). LnHF-VTLI and lnHF-VTLD relations presented, in the independent maneuvers, three combinations of slopes of different sign, all with hysteresis, and in the combined maneuver, strong correlations with negative slope for VTLI and positive slope for VTLD, steeper (p < 0.001) and with greater hysteresis (p < 0.001) than the independent ones. LnHF responses to our fast, non-fatiguing and non-steady-state breathing maneuvers are: similar between genders; consistent attenuation due to RFLI, whether applied alone or combined; ambiguous and with hysteresis to independent VTLI-VTLD variations; systematic greater attenuation during RFLI combined with VTLI-VTLD, equal to the sum of the independent effects, indicating that there is no interference between them.

A multi-signature brain-computer interface: use of transient and steady-state responses

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this paper was to increase the information transfer in brain-computer interfaces (BCI). Therefore, a multi-signature BCI was developed and investigated. Stimuli were designed to simultaneously evoke transient somatosensory event-related potentials (ERPs) and steady-state somatosensory potentials (SSSEPs) and the ERPs and SSSEPs in isolation.

APPROACH

Twelve subjects participated in two sessions. In the first session, the single and combined stimulation conditions were compared on these somatosensory responses and on the classification performance. In the second session the on-line performance with the combined stimulation was evaluated while subjects received feedback. Furthermore, in both sessions, the performance based on ERP and SSSEP features was compared.

MAIN RESULTS

No difference was found in the ERPs and SSSEPs between stimulation conditions. The combination of ERP and SSSEP features did not perform better than with ERP features only. In both sessions, the classification performances based on ERP and combined features were higher than the classification based on SSSEP features.

SIGNIFICANCE

Although the multi-signature BCI did not increase performance, it also did not negatively impact it. Therefore, such stimuli could be used and the best performing feature set could then be chosen individually.

Transient and steady-state responses to mechanical stimulation of different fingers reveal interactions based on lateral inhibition

OBJECTIVE

Simultaneous tactile finger stimulation evokes transient ERP responses that are smaller than the linear summation of ERP responses to individual stimulation. Occlusion and lateral inhibition are two possible mechanisms responsible for this effect. The present study disentangles these two effects using steady-state somatosensory evoked potentials (SSSEP). Simultaneous stimulation on adjacent and distant finger pairs with the same and different stimulation frequencies are compared.

METHODS

The index finger (IF), middle finger (MF) and little finger (LF) were mechanically stimulated with a frequency of 18, 22 or 26Hz, respectively. Stimulation was applied for each finger separately, and for the IF (18Hz) in combination with either the MF or LF for 22 and 26Hz, respectively. A measure for interaction (IR) was calculated for the P60 component and the SSSEP amplitude.

RESULTS

Significant interactions were found in both the P60 response and in the SSSEP response. Stimulation of adjacent finger combinations caused more interaction than distant finger combinations. No difference was found between stimulation of two fingers with the same or a different frequency.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicate that lateral inhibition is mainly responsible for the interaction effect.

SIGNIFICANCE

These observations provide further insight in the mechanisms behind interaction between somatosensory inputs.

Hand posture modulates cortical finger representation in SII

Somatosensory magnetic fields evoked by electrical stimuli of the thumb or the index finger were recorded using a whole head magnetoencephalography (MEG) system in 10 subjects performing different finger postures, open hand posture and close hand posture for picking up a small object. The mean Euclidean distances between the ECD (equivalent current dipole) locations for the thumb and index finger in the secondary somatosensory cortex (SII) across the subjects were 8.5 +/- 2.1 mm in the close hand posture and 11.2 +/- 2.6 mm in the open hand posture. The distance was significantly shorter in the close hand posture (paired t test, P = 0.002, n = 8). However, the distances of the P38m and P60m components in the primary somatosensory cortex (SI) were not significantly different between the two hand postures (P38m: 13.4 +/- 5.6 mm in the open and 13.5 +/- 3.9 mm in the close; P60m: 12.4 +/- 2.6 mm in the open and 16.2 +/- 5.3 mm in the close). This shortening of the spatial distance between the cortical finger representations suggests a similarity in humans of the rapid changes in the dynamics of cortical circuits reported in animal studies. In addition, the overlap of the cortical finger representations, which might be suggested by the shortening of the distance between the ECDs in SII, is likely to play a role in information integration between sensory inputs from the thumb and index finger.