Update of ELITE-II, BEST, CHAMP, and IMPRESS clinical trials in heart failure

Synergy between sacubitril and valsartan leads to hemodynamic, antifibrotic, and exercise tolerance benefits in rats with preexisting heart failure

Simultaneous neprilysin inhibition (NEPi) and angiotensin receptor blockade (ARB) with sacubitril/valsartan improves cardiac function and exercise tolerance in patients with heart failure. However, it is not known whether these therapeutic benefits are primarily due to NEPi with sacubitril or ARB with valsartan or their combination. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to investigate the potential contribution of sacubitril and valsartan to the benefits of the combination therapy on left ventricular (LV) function and exercise tolerance. Heart failure was induced by volume overload via partial disruption of the aortic valve in rats. Therapy began 4 wk after valve disruption and lasted through 8 wk. Drugs were administered daily via oral gavage [sacubitril/valsartan (68 mg/kg), valsartan (31 mg/kg), and sacubitril (31 mg/kg)]. Hemodynamic assessments were conducted using Millar technology, and an exercise tolerance test was conducted using a rodent treadmill. Therapy with sacubitril/valsartan improved load-dependent indexes of LV contractility (dP/d t_max) and relaxation (dP/d t_min), exercise tolerance, and mitigated myocardial fibrosis, whereas monotherapies with valsartan, or sacubitril did not. Both sacubitril/valsartan and valsartan similarly improved a load-independent index of contractility [slope of the end-systolic pressure-volume relationship ( E_es)]. Sacubitril did not improve E_es. First, synergy of NEPi with sacubitril and ARB with valsartan leads to the improvement of load-dependent LV contractility and relaxation, exercise tolerance, and reduction of myocardial collagen content. Second, the improvement in load-independent LV contractility with sacubitril/valsartan appears to be solely due to ARB with valsartan constituent. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Our data suggest the following explanation for the effects of sacubitril/valsartan: 1) synergy of sacubitril and valsartan leads to the improvement of load-dependent left ventricular contractility and relaxation, exercise tolerance, and reduction of myocardial fibrosis and 2) improvement in load-independent left ventricular contractility is solely due to the valsartan constituent. The findings offer a better understanding of the outcomes observed in clinical studies and might facilitate the continuing development of the next generations of angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitors.

The first preclinical pharmacotoxicological safety assessment of CGS 35601, a triple vasopeptidase inhibitor, in chronically instrumented, conscious, and unrestrained spontaneously hypertensive rats

CGS 35601 is a triple vasopeptidase inhibitor (VPI) of angiotensin-converting enzyme, neutral endopeptidase, and endothelin-converting enzyme-1 with respective IC50 values of 22, 2, and 55 nM. We characterized the safety profile and toxicity of escalating doses of CGS 35601 over a 20-day period in chronically instrumented, unrestrained, conscious, male, spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR). Once instrumented with an arterial catheter, the SHR were placed in metabolic cages allowing daily assessment of hemodynamics and blood sampling for biochemical and hematological measurements. After a 7-day stabilization period, the SHR were divided into 2 groups: Gr. 1, (n = 13 to 18) receiving CGS 35601 at 0.01, 0.1, 1 and 5 mg kg(-1) day(-1) (continuous i.a. infusion) for 5 consecutive days/dose, followed by a 5-day washout; and Gr. 2, (n = 10) receiving vehicle (saline). The highest dose of CGS 35601 dose-dependently reduced MABP from 156 +/- 4 up to 94 +/- 5 mm Hg, whereas heart rate, metabolic, electrolytic, and hematological profiles, growth, diuresis, and renal activity were unaffected, and no hepatic or liver toxicities were observed. These results suggest that this novel triple VPI presents no safety concerns at this stage and may become of interest for the treatment of hypertension and other cardiovascular disorders. Long-term chronic experiments are needed to assess possible angioedema and increases in vascular permeability.

Epidemiology of heart failure in a community-based study of subjects aged > or = 57 years: incidence and long-term survival

BACKGROUND

Survival data from hospital-based or clinical trial studies of patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) do not represent survival in community-based settings.

AIMS

To determine the incidence of CHF and the associated long-term survival in a community-based sample aged > or = 57 years and to assess the mortality risk associated with sex and age.

METHODS

This study was part of the Groningen Longitudinal Aging Study.

RESULTS

Annual incidence of CHF per 1000 ranged from 2.5 in middle aged adults (57-60 years) up to 22.4 in older females (> or = 80 years) and 28.2 in older males (> or = 80 years). The 1, 2, 5 and 7-year survival rates were 74%, 65%, 45%, 32% for patients with CHF, compared to 97%, 94%, 80% and 70% in a matched reference group without CHF. Higher age (> or = 76 years) was a risk factor for mortality (OR = 2.1) and male sex was a risk factor in those aged < or = 75 years (OR = 1.9) but not for older patients.

CONCLUSION

Long-term survival rates for patients with CHF in the community were worse than the known survival rates from clinical trials. There is a need for studies describing the care of patients with CHF in the community, including the type of care, the provider, the quality of care and the outcome.

The dilemma of late-stage heart failure. Rationale for chronic parenteral inotropic support

The available evidence suggests that while chronic inotropic support likely exerts a long-term deleterious effect on survival, their use is accompanied by short-term enhancements in symptomatology and decreases in medical resource use, thereby curtailing the overall medical costs. The decision to use chronic parenteral inotropic support should not be made lightly and must be considered only after all evidence based therapeutic options has been investigated thoroughly and tried (Fig. 1). This should include not only hemodynamic monitoring-based drug therapy but [figure: see text] also appropriate consideration for options such as heart transplantation or patient enrollment into large-scale drug trials that seek to answer pertinent issues relating to various aspects of advanced heart failure therapeutics. The use of parenteral inotropic support as a chronic bridge to transplantation is accepted widely but remains controversial in other scenarios. For instance, when refractory congestion or hypoperfusion is exhibited in the absence of any definitive medical or mechanical option, it may be wise to contemplate inotropic support after appropriate informed consent has been obtained from the patient. Lastly, it is of great importance to continually seek ways to transit the patient from this approach to a definitive therapeutic end point, such as with transition to oral beta-blockade, which may be better tolerated in the patient with advanced heart failure using an inotropic umbrella.

Clinical trials update: highlights of the scientific sessions of the American Heart Association year 2000: Val HeFT, COPERNICUS, MERIT, CIBIS-II, BEST, AMIOVIRT, V-MAC, BREATHE, HEAT, MIRACL, FLORIDA, VIVA and the first human cardiac skeletal muscle myoblast transfer for heart failure

This article continues a series of reports summarising recent research developments pertinent to the topic of heart failure. This is a summary of presentations made at scientific sessions of the American Heart Association in November 2000. Clinical studies of particular interest to people caring for patients with heart failure include Val-HeFT, AMIOVIRT and V-MAC. New data from beta-blockers trials are reviewed, highlights from some important developments in post-infarction care, including MIRACL and FLORIDA, discussed and results of some early studies of gene therapy reported.

Clinical trials update: IMPROVEMENT-HF, COPERNICUS, MUSTIC, ASPECT-II, APRICOT and HEART

Important new studies relevant to the field of heart failure reported at the annual congress of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC), held in Amsterdam in August 2000, are reviewed. The IMPROVEMENT of Heart Failure survey investigated the knowledge and perceptions of over 1300 primary care physicians from 14 ESC member nations and the actual practice in over 11000 of their patients. Guidelines and clinical practice were compared. The survey suggested, in this large sample, that the quality of care was higher than previous smaller surveys have suggested but have also identified important deficiencies in knowledge and management that should be rectified. The COPERNICUS study demonstrated that carvedilol was remarkably well tolerated even in patients with very severe heart failure and that treatment was associated with a substantial reduction in mortality even among patients that would conventionally not be considered, by many, for beta-blocker therapy. The MUSTIC trial suggested that cardiac resynchronisation using biventricular pacing improved patients symptomatically whether or not the patient was in atrial fibrillation. Morbidity and mortality studies of cardiac resynchronisation are now underway. The ASPECT-II and APRICOT-II studies investigated the role of warfarin, aspirin and their combination for the long-term management of myocardial infarction. One interpretation of the data from these studies is that the combination of aspirin and warfarin is about as effective as warfarin alone but with a much higher incidence of side effects. Warfarin alone appeared superior to aspirin alone. In summary, the annual congress of the ESC provided important new information for clinical practice and, to date, was, by far, the most important cardiology congress in the world this year.

Neurohumoral blockade in CHF management

Is heart failure an endocrine disease? Historically, congestive heart failure (CHF) has often been regarded as a mechanical and haemodynamic condition. However, there is now strong evidence that the activation of neuroendocrine systems, like the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) and sympathetic nervous system, as well as the activation of natriuretic peptides, endothelin and vasopressin, play key roles in the progression of CHF. In this context, agents targeting neurohormones offer a highly rational approach to CHF management, with ACE inhibitors, aldosterone antagonists and beta-adrenergic blockade improving the prognosis for many patients. Although relevant improvements in clinical status and survival can be achieved with these drug classes, mortality rates for patients with CHF are still very high. Moreover, most patients do not receive these proven life-prolonging drugs, partially due to fear of adverse events, such as hypotension (with ACE inhibitors), gynaecomastia (with spironolactone) and fatigue (with beta-blockers). New agents that combine efficacy with better tolerability are therefore needed. The angiotensin II type 1 (AT(1))-receptor blockers have the potential to fulfil both these requirements, by blocking the deleterious cardiovascular and haemodynamic effects of angiotensin II while offering placebo-like tolerability. As shown with candesartan, AT(1)-receptor blockers also modulate the levels of other neurohormones, including aldosterone and atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP). Combined with its tight, long-lasting binding to AT(1)-receptors, this characteristic gives candesartan the potential for complete blockade of the RAAS-neurohormonal axis, along with the great potential to improve clinical outcomes.

Clinical trials update: OPTIME-CHF, PRAISE-2, ALL-HAT

This is a summary of reports of presentation made at the American College of Cardiology 49th Scientific Sessions, Anaheim, 12-15 March 2000. Studies with a particular interest for heart failure physicians have been reviewed. OPTIME-CHF: Outcomes of a Prospective Trial of Intravenous Milrinone for Exacerbations of Chronic Heart Failure. OPTIME-CHF was a randomised-controlled trial comparing a 48-h infusion of Milrinone or standard therapy in 951 patients recruited over a 2-year period. Patients were excluded if the investigator believed their clinical condition mandated inotropic therapy. Patients were randomised within 48 h of admission for an acute exacerbation of chronic heart failure to receive Milrinone or placebo infision for 48 h. Of the patients 43% were diabetics, 70% were receiving an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor, 25% were already on a beta-Blocker, and 34% had atrial fibrillation. There was no significant difference between the two groups in length of hospital stay during the index admission, subsequent readmissions and days in hospital over the following 60 days. Subjective clinical assessment scores were also no different. There was an average admission rate over the next year of one per patient in both groups. However, there was a significant increase in the incidence of sustained hypotension in the Milrinone group, which accounted for all of the increased adverse event rates for the active therapy. The 60-day mortality was 10% in both groups. This and previous trials of the oral formulation of Milrinone have now clearly demonstrated a lack of benefit with Milrinone in either during acute exacerbations of or in stable severe chronic heart failure [Packer M, Carver JR, Rodeheffer RJ et al. Effect of oral Milrinone on mortality in severe chronic heart failure. N Engl J Med 1991;325:1468-1475.]. Medium sized studies of Milrinone in patients with milder severities of heart failure also suggested an adverse impact on prognosis in the presence or absence of digoxin [DiBianco R, Shabetai R, Kostuk W, Moran J, Schlant RC, Wright R. A comparison of oral Milrinone, digoxin, and their combination in the treatment of patients with chronic heart failure. N Engl J Med 1989;320:677-683.]. Whether Milrinone even has a role for the management of a haemodyamic crisis requiring inotropic therapy must also be questioned.