Left ventricle assist systems: a possible alternative to heart transplantation for heart failure patients? Patient selection, techniques and benefit

First use of a novel plug-and-play percutaneous circulatory assist device for high-risk coronary angioplasty

OBJECTIVES

Novel circulatory assist devices provide hemodynamic stability in high risk coronary interventions. They ensure sufficient organ perfusion during transfer in case of procedural failure or cardiogenic arrest. We describe the first human use of a novel plug-and-play circulatory assist device for high risk coronary angioplasty.

METHODS

An 84 year old lady suffered syncope with complex fracture of the left forearm. Her syncope was related to a subtotal stenosis of the left main coronary artery associated with an acute myocardial infarction. Additional risk factors were previous cardiac surgery, pulmonary disease, diabetes mellitus, and renal insufficiency. Coronary angiography revealed stenosis of both coronary ostia. The emergency assist device LIFEBRIDGE was connected with the patient's circulation by percutaneous cannulation (15F and 17F) of the femoral artery and vein.

RESULTS

Stent implantation was performed in both coronary ostia by Judkin's technique. The cannulas were removed two hours after the intervention by local compression. Osteosynthesis of the left radius and ulna was performed five days later under regional anesthesia. The patient was discharged without any complains on day 10.

CONCLUSION

This case illustrates the safe and easy use of a novel plug-and-play percutaneous circulatory assist device for high risk interventions. It may be recommended for use in emergency situations.

Mechanical circulatory support for advanced heart failure: effect of patient selection on outcome

BACKGROUND

Use of wearable left ventricular assist systems (LVAS) in the treatment of advanced heart failure has steadily increased since 1993, when these devices became generally available in Europe. The aim of this study was to identify in an unselected cohort of LVAS recipients those aspects of patient selection that have an impact on postimplant survival.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Data were obtained from the Novacor European Registry. Between 1993 and 1999, 464 patients were implanted with the Novacor LVAS. The majority had idiopathic (60%) or ischemic (27%) cardiomyopathy; the median age at implant was 49 (16 to 75) years. The median support time was 100 days (4.1 years maximum). Forty-nine percent of the recipients were discharged from the hospital on LVAS; they spent 75% of their time out of the hospital. For a subset of 366 recipients, for whom a complete set of data was available, multivariate analysis revealed that the following preimplant conditions were independent risk factors for survival after LVAS implantation: respiratory failure associated with septicemia (odds ratio 11.2), right heart failure (odds ratio 3.2), age >65 years (odds ratio 3.01), acute postcardiotomy (odds ratio 1.8), and acute infarction (odds ratio 1.7). For patients without any of these factors, the 1-year survival after LVAS implantation including the posttransplantation period was 60%; for the combined group with at least 1 risk factor, it was 24%.

CONCLUSIONS

Careful selection, specifically implantation before patients become moribund, and improvement of management may result in improved outcomes of LVAS treatment for advanced heart failure.