Part II: Liver function in oncology: towards safer chemotherapy use

Standardizing eligibility and patient selection for Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy: A Delphi consensus statement

INTRODUCTION

Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC) is a procedure for minimally invasive drug administration in patients with peritoneal metastasis. Previous studies have emphasized the importance of uniformity in treatment protocols and standardization of this practice. This study aimed to reach a consensus on eligibility, patient selection, and choice of chemotherapy for PIPAC.

METHODS

A three-round modified Delphi study was conducted. A steering group formulated a list of baseline statements, addressing the objectives. The steering group consisted of seven expert surgical and medical oncologists. Available evidence and published key opinions were critically reviewed. An international expert panel scored those statements on a 4-point Likert scale. The statements were submitted electronically and anonymously. Consensus was reached if the agreement rate was ≥75%. A minimum Cronbach's alpha of >0.8 was set.

RESULTS

Forty-five (45/58; 77.6%) experts participated and completed all rounds. Experts were digestive surgeons (n = 28), surgical oncologists (n = 7), gynecologists (n = 5), medical oncologists (n = 4), and one clinical researcher. Their assessment of 81 preliminary statements in the first round resulted in 41 consolidated statements. In round two, consensus was reached on 40 statements (40/41; 97.6%) with a consensus of ≥80% for each individual statement. In the third round, 40 statements were unanimously approved as definitive. The choice of first- and second-line chemotherapy remained controversial and could not reach consensus.

CONCLUSIONS

This International Delphi study provides practical guidance on eligibility and patient selection for PIPAC. Ongoing trial data and long-term results that could contribute to the further standardization of PIPAC are eagerly awaited.

Cancer Therapy-related Hepatic Injury in Children: Imaging Review from the Pediatric LI-RADS Working Group

The liver is the primary organ for the metabolism of many chemotherapeutic agents. Treatment-induced liver injury is common in children undergoing cancer therapy. Hepatic injury occurs due to various mechanisms, including biochemical cytotoxicity, hepatic vascular injury, radiation-induced cytotoxicity, and direct hepatic injury through minimally invasive and invasive surgical treatments. Treatment-induced liver injury can be seen contemporaneous with therapy and months to years after therapy is complete. Patients can develop a combination of hepatic injuries manifesting during and after treatment. Acute toxic effects of cancer therapy in children include hepatitis, steatosis, steatohepatitis, cholestasis, hemosiderosis, and vascular injury. Longer-term effects of cancer therapy include hepatic fibrosis, chronic liver failure, and development of focal liver lesions. Quantitative imaging techniques can provide useful metrics for disease diagnosis and monitoring, especially in treatment-related diffuse liver injury such as hepatic steatosis and steatohepatitis, hepatic iron deposition, and hepatic fibrosis. Focal liver lesions, including those developing as a result of treatment-related vascular injury such as focal nodular hyperplasia-like lesions and hepatic perfusion anomalies, as well as hepatic infections occurring as a consequence of immune suppression, can be anxiety provoking and confused with recurrent malignancy or hepatic metastases, although there often are imaging features that help elucidate the correct diagnosis. Radiologic evaluation, in conjunction with clinical and biochemical screening, is integral to diagnosing and monitoring hepatic complications of cancer therapy in pediatric patients during therapy and after therapy completion for long-term surveillance. ©RSNA, 2023 Quiz questions for this article are available in the supplemental material See the invited commentary by Ferraciolli and Gee in this issue.

Albumin-bilirubin score predicts trastuzumab resistance in HER2-positive breast cancer

BACKGROUND

The albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) score is a novel indicator of liver function. Some studies showed that the ALBI score was a predictive marker for the prognosis and efficacy of drug therapy in malignancies. We aimed to assess the predicted role of ALBI score in the sensitivity to therapy with trastuzumab in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) positive breast cancer (BC). The clinical data of 226 HER2-positive BC patients at the Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital from January 2017 and December 2018 were retrospectively collected. The ALBI score was calculated with serum albumin and bilirubin before diagnosis. The associations between ALBI score and trastuzumab resistance were analyzed by logistic regression analyses. The patients with trastuzumab resistance had higher ALBI scores compared with the patients without trastuzumab resistance. Moreover, there were weak correlations between the ALBI score and lymph node status (P= 0.093). In addition, multivariate analysis revealed that the ALBI score was an independent prognostic factor for trastuzumab resistance in HER2-positive BC. High ALBI score is associated with trastuzumab resistance in HER2-positive BC. Future studies are needed.

Clinical Characteristics and Management of Patients With Concomitant Liver Cirrhosis and Lymphoma: A Systematic Review

Over the years, a rising incidence of liver cirrhosis and lymphoma has been observed. Therefore, the risk of having cirrhosis as a comorbidity increases, thus challenging treatment approaches as data on the management of these patients is lacking. We performed a systematic review to summarize papers that analyzed patients with liver cirrhosis that occurred before and/or concomitantly to lymphoma. We identified 153 papers (230 patients) through Pubmed and/or Embase search. Publications comprised predominantly of case reports and/or case series. Most patients had HCV-related cirrhosis (62.6%), and aggressive lymphoma histology (59.6%). Data on liver status was available in 55.7% of all patients, with 46.1% having decompensated liver cirrhosis. These patients experienced more often treatment reductions and/or modifications, treatment side effects, and inferior survival than those with compensated cirrhosis (median 18 months vs. median not reached). Dose reductions and/or treatment modifications primarily due to concomitant liver disease were common. Moreover, liver toxicity was observed in 33.6% of patients with provided information on treatment side effects, ranging from mild toxicity to liver failure with fatal outcomes. Again, despite treatment modification/reduction, patients with decompensated liver cirrhosis developed hepatic toxicity more frequently than patients with compensated liver disease. Although patients suffering from cirrhosis and lymphoma can tolerate standard chemoimmunotherapy, a cautious multidisciplinary approach is needed to evaluate the risks and benefits.

Preoperative albumin-bilirubin score as a prognostic indicator in patients with stage III colon cancer

The albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) score was created to assess the severity of liver dysfunction and to predict prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma. Purpose of this study was to investigate the prognostic value of the ALBI score in patients with stage III colon cancer using propensity score matching (PSM) analysis. This study analyzed 510 patients with stage III colon cancer who had surgery between 2014 and 2015. The ALBI score was calculated as follows: (log10 bilirubin (μmol/L) [Formula: see text] 0.66) + (albumin (g/L) [Formula: see text] -0.0852), and the optimal cut-off value was determined using a receiver operating characteristic analysis and the Youden Index. According to the calculated cut-off value, patients were divided into two groups: Group A (ALBI ≤  - 2.54) and Group B (ALBI >  - 2.54). The average ALBI score was - 2.68 (from - 3.39 to - 0.69). Group A had a significantly higher 5-year disease-free survival rate (85.5% vs 75.7%, p = 0.02), 5-year cancer-specific survival rate (93.7% vs 84.4%, p = 0.02), and 5-year overall survival rate (90.6% vs 77.4%, p = 0.01) than Group B. High ALBI scores were found to be an independent risk factor for both disease-free survival (HR 1.68, p = 0.048) and cancer-specific survival (HR 2.24, p = 0.028). The preoperative ALBI score was found to be a promising prognostic indicator for predicting recurrence and survival in patients with stage III colon cancer in this study. Because the ALBI score is simple and inexpensive to obtain, it has the potential to be a useful clinical marker for colon cancer patients.

The presence of non-hepatic malignancy and its implication in pursuing liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

Primary extrahepatic malignancy and chronic liver disease co-exist in a considerable number of patients, creating a dilemma both in the aspects of liver transplant candidacy and cancer therapy. In this review, we will explore several aspects and controversies of liver transplantation in patients with non-hepatocellular carcinoma malignancy including risks of cancer recurrence after liver transplantation and the ethical dilemma of the selection of liver transplantation candidates with non-hepatic malignancy.

METHODS

We performed a search in several online databases and reviewed published articles and ongoing clinical trials in the topics of transplantation and pre-existing malignancies.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Liver transplantation can be safely performed in selected patients with pre-existing extrahepatic malignancies with low recurrence rate if they have an expected 5-year survival rate of at least 50%. The cancer-free period before transplantation depends on the type, stage, and location of cancer. A shorter or no wait-time may be considered in an early stage cancer or carcinoma in situ. The urgency and benefits of liver transplantation should also be taken into consideration when determining a reasonable wait-time. This is particularly important in patients with decompensated cirrhosis who cannot afford to wait a few years before they can undergo liver transplantation.

A review of the evidence base for utilizing Child-Pugh criteria for guiding dosing of anticancer drugs in patients with cancer and liver impairment

As the liver is vital for the metabolism of many anticancer drugs, determining the correct starting doses in cancer patients with liver impairment is key to safe prescription and prevention of unnecessary adverse effects. Clinicians typically use liver function tests when evaluating patients; however, prescribing information and summaries of product characteristics often suggest dosing of anticancer drugs in patients with liver impairment based on the Child-Pugh criteria, even though the criteria were not developed for this purpose. In this review, we assessed all the oncological small molecule and cytotoxic drugs approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) over a 5-year period from 2014 to 2018. The various entry criteria related to these drugs—with respect to hepatic function—in key pivotal studies were compared with their approved dosing recommendations found in prescribing information and summaries of product characteristics. We found that 46% of drugs have dosing recommendations based on Child-Pugh criteria alone, despite the fact that only 8% of these drugs were tested within studies that used the Child-Pugh criteria as entry criteria. Moreover, we note that the data used to make recommendations based on Child-Pugh criteria are typically from small studies that may lack an appropriate patient population. We propose that these findings, along with details surrounding the development of the Child-Pugh criteria, call into question the validity and appropriateness of using Child-Pugh criteria for dosing recommendations of anticancer drugs.

•

Dosing information for anticancer drugs in patients with liver impairment is often based on the Child-Pugh criteria.

•

Clinical trials and clinicians typically use liver function tests when evaluating patients.

•

Of the 39 oncologic drugs examined, almost half (46%) had dosing recommendations based on Child-Pugh criteria alone.

•

We question whether using Child-Pugh criteria for dosing recommendations of anticancer drugs is the best approach.

TSC1/2 mutations-a unique type of mutation suitable for liver transplantation of Hepatocellular carcinoma

Background

This study aimed to investigate the relationship between the prognosis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after liver transplantation and mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway-related genes-TSC1/2.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 46 patients who underwent liver transplantation for HCC and performed next generation sequencing to analyze the relationship between the efficacy of sirolimus after liver transplantation for HCC and mutations in mTOR pathway-related genes, especially tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) mutations.

Results

The average age of 46 patients with liver transplantation for HCC was 51±21 years. After surgery, 35 patients received an anti-rejection/anti-tumor regimen that included sirolimus, and 11 patients did not receive sirolimus. There was no significant difference in survival rate between the two groups (P=0.761). The gene sequencing results showed mTOR-related pathway mutations in 10 patients, of whom five (10.9%) had TSC1/2 mutations. Of the 35 patients using sirolimus, those with mTOR-related mutations had significantly better survival rates than patients without mTOR-related mutations (P=0.016).

Conclusions

According to genetic sequencing results, a personalized treatment plan for specific genetic mutations should be selected in patients undergoing liver transplantation for HCC. Patients with mTOR-related gene mutations, especially TSC mutations, can gain significant benefits from the use of mTOR inhibitors such as sirolimus.

Prevalence of acute liver dysfunction and impact on outcome in critically ill patients with hematological malignancies: a single-center retrospective cohort study

Patients with hematological malignancies (HM) often require ICU admission, and acute respiratory or renal failure are then independent risk factors for mortality. Data are scarce on acute liver dysfunction (ALD), despite HM patients cumulating risk factors. The objective of this retrospective cohort study was to assess the prevalence of ALD in critically ill HM patients and its impact on outcome. Data of all patients with HM admitted to the medical ICU between 2008 and 2018 were extracted from electronic medical records. ALD was defined by ALT > 165 U/L, AST > 230 U/L, or total bilirubin > 4 mg/dL. Univariate and multivariate logistic regressions were used to analyze hospital mortality. Charts of survivors with ALD were reviewed to assess impact of ALD on subsequent anti-cancer treatment. We included 971 patients (60% male), age 64 (54-72) years, of whom 196 (20%) developed ALD. ALD patients were younger, more frequently had liver cirrhosis or acute leukemia, and had increased severity of illness and vital organ support needs. ALD was associated with hospital mortality in univariate (OR 4.14, 95% CI 2.95-5.80, p < 0.001) and multivariate analysis (OR 1.86, 95% CI 1.07-3.24, p = 0.03). Hospital mortality was 46% in ALD patients; among 106 survivors, a third of patients requiring therapy received it as previously planned, and half of the patients were alive at 1 year. In summary, in a large population of critically ill patients with hematological malignancies, 20% developed ALD, which was an independent risk factor for hospital mortality and occasionally altered further anti-cancer treatment.

ABCB1 and ERCC1 gene polymorphisms are associated with nephro- and hepatotoxicity to carboplatin/paclitaxel-based chemotherapy in patients with gynecologic cancers

BACKGROUND

Paclitaxel/carboplatin combination is the standard chemotherapeutic protocol for gynecologic cancers, but severe toxicities may compromise treatment. There is great inter-individual variability regarding the incidence and severity of toxicities, which may be due to single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) affecting drug disposition or cellular sensitivity. Here we investigate the impact of selected SNPs in ERCC1, ABCB1, CYP2C8, and CYP3A5 genes on the incidence of severe toxicities, including nephro- and hepatotoxicity.

METHODS

A cohort of 507 gynecological cancer patients receiving paclitaxel/carboplatin was recruited at the Brazilian National Cancer Institute (INCA-Brazil). Clinical data were obtained during routine consultations or from electronic medical records. Toxicities were graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE 5.0). Genotyping was performed using real-time PCR.

RESULTS

ABCB1 c.1236C>T was associated with moderate-to-severe (grades 2-4) nephrotoxicity (OR_adjusted 2.40; 95% CI 1.39-4.15), even after adjustment for age (≥ 65) and diabetes. The risk association between ABCB1 c.1236C>T and moderate-to-severe nephrotoxicity following paclitaxel/carboplatin chemotherapy was also present among non-diabetic patients (OR_adjusted 2.16; 95% CI 1.22-3.82). ERCC1 c.118C>T was the only individual variable associated with an increased risk for moderate-to-severe (grades 2-4) hepatotoxicity (OR 3.71; 95% CI 1.08-12.77), severe nausea (OR 4.18; 95% CI 1.59-10.95), and severe myalgia (OR 1.95; 95% CI 1.12-3.40).

CONCLUSIONS

ABCB1 c.1236C>T and ERCC1 c.118C>T might serve as potential biomarkers for the risk of moderate-to-severe toxicities to carboplatin/paclitaxel chemotherapy of gynecological cancers.

Dose recommendations for anticancer drugs in patients with renal or hepatic impairment

Renal or hepatic impairment is a common comorbidity for patients with cancer either because of the disease itself, toxicity of previous anticancer treatments, or because of other factors affecting organ function, such as increased age. Because renal and hepatic function are among the main determinants of drug exposure, the pharmacokinetic profile might be altered for patients with cancer who have renal or hepatic impairment, necessitating dose adjustments. Most anticancer drugs are dosed near their maximum tolerated dose and are characterised by a narrow therapeutic index. Consequently, selecting an adequate dose for patients who have either hepatic or renal impairment, or both, is challenging and definitive recommendations on dose adjustments are scarce. In this Review, we discuss the effect of renal and hepatic impairment on the pharmacokinetics of anticancer drugs. To guide clinicians in selecting appropriate dose adjustments, information from available drug labels and from the published literature were combined to provide a practical set of recommendations for dose adjustments of 160 anticancer drugs for patients with hepatic and renal impairment.

Comparison of hepatic resection and systemic treatment of breast cancer liver metastases: A propensity score matching study

BACKGROUND

The role of surgery in breast cancer liver metastases (BCLM) remains elusive, and current application is limited. Our aim is to investigate whether hepatic resection (HR) of BCLM improves survival compared with non-hepatic resection (NHR) treatment.

METHODS

Three hundred and eighty-four patients with BCLM from 2008 to 2018 were divided into two groups. Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was used to compare the clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

After PSM the mean overall survival (OS) and the 1, 3, and 5-year OS rates in HR group were 61.8 months, 92.6%, 54.7% and 54.7%, respectively; while for NHR group these values were 38.6 months, 79.2%, 45.6% and 21.9%, respectively (p < 0.007). Multivariate analysis indicated hormonal receptor status (p = 0.039) and hepatic resection (p = 0.032) were independent prognostic factors.

CONCLUSION

Our study revealed that hepatectomy yields a survival benefit safely compared with medical treatments, especially for patients with positive hormonal receptors.

Thermal Ablation for Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma in Cirrhosis: Safety and Efficacy in Non-Surgical Patients

PURPOSE

To assess the effectiveness, safety, and overall survival (OS) of thermal ablation as upfront treatment of intrahepatic colangiocarcinoma (ICC) in patients with cirrhosis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a retrospective analysis of all biopsy-confirmed ICC in cirrhotic patients treated in the authors' unit from 2001 to 2017. Baseline characteristics, ablation procedures, and complications were recorded, and time to recurrence (TTR) and OS were calculated. Twenty-seven patients were identified. Seventy percent had Child-Pugh A disease, and most had clinically significant portal hypertension. Median tumor size was 21 mm. Twenty-one cases were uninodular, and 10 were single ≤ 2 cm.

RESULTS

Complete radiologic necrosis was achieved in 25 cases (92.6%). Median OS was 30.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 22.6-46.5), and recurrence was detected in 21 cases (77.8%) with a TTR of 10.1 months (95% CI, 7.7-20.9). In those patients with single ≤ 2-cm ICC, the OS was 94.5 months (95% CI, 11.7-not reached). Differences in OS were statistically significant between patients with single ICC ≤ 2 cm and patients with single ICC > 2 cm (P = .04) and between patients with single ICC > 2 cm and patients with multinodular ICC (P = .02). Only 1 patient had a treatment-related complication.

CONCLUSIONS

Thermal ablation is a safe and effective treatment for ICC in patients with cirrhosis who are not candidates for surgery. The OS is similar to that reported in surgical series, but the initial treatment success is hampered by a high rate of tumor recurrence. Encouraging long-term survival after thermal ablation is achieved in patients with single ≤ 2-cm ICC.

A Simple and Easily Reproducible Model of Reversible Obstructive Jaundice in Rats

BACKGROUND/AIM

Cholangiocarcinoma and pancreatic carcinoma are major malignancies that cause obstructive jaundice (OJ). This study aimed to develop a simple and easily reproducible rat model of reversible OJ (ROJ).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

OJ was induced by clamping the common bile duct (CBD) using a U-shaped titanium hemoclip and its base was attached by ligation using 2-cm long 4-0 polypropylene suture. An anti-adhesive sheet was placed around the CBD. OJ was mitigated by pulling the suture to remove the clip under laparotomy 3 days later. Serum chemistry and liver histopathology were compared between the ROJ group and sham surgery (SH) groups.

RESULTS

Three days after inducing OJ, serum total bilirubin, aspartate aminotransferase, and alanine aminotransferase were remarkably elevated in the ROJ group and thereafter reduced significantly after mitigating OJ. Similar findings were confirmed by histopathology.

CONCLUSION

Our rat model of reversible OJ was considered simple and easily reproducible.

The use of SAMe in chemotherapy-induced liver injury

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) remains the most common cause of acute liver failure in the Western world. Chemotherapy is one of the major class of drugs most frequently associated with idiosyncratic DILI. For this reason, patients who receive chemotherapy require careful assessment of liver function prior to treatment to determine which drugs may not be appropriate and which drug doses should be modified. S-adenosylmethionine (SAMe) is an endogenous agent derived from methionine. Its supplementation is effective in the treatment of liver disease, in particular intrahepatic cholestasis (IHC). The target of this review is to analyze the mechanisms of hepatotoxicity of the principal anticancer agents and the role of SAMe in the prevention of this complication.

Locoregional Therapies for the Treatment of Hepatic Metastases from Breast and Gynecologic Cancers

Breast cancer is the most common women's malignancy in the United States and is the second leading cause of cancer death. More than half of patients with breast cancer will develop hepatic metastases; this portends a poorer prognosis. In the appropriately selected patient, there does appear to be a role for curative (surgery, ablation) or palliative (intra-arterial treatments) locoregional therapy. Gynecologic malignancies are less common and metastases to the liver are most often seen in the setting of disseminated disease. The role of locoregional therapies in these patients is not well reported. The purpose of this article is to review the outcomes data of locoregional therapies in the treatment of hepatic metastases from breast and gynecologic malignancies.

Anticancer Dose Adjustment for Patients with Renal and Hepatic Dysfunction: From Scientific Evidence to Clinical Application

Most anticancer agents exhibit a narrow therapeutic index, i.e., a small change in plasma concentrations can lead to a less efficacious treatment or an unacceptable degree of toxicity. This study aimed at providing health professionals with a feasible and time-saving tool to adapt the dose of anticancer agents for patients with renal or hepatic dysfunction. A guideline for anticancer agents was developed based on a literature search. An algorithm was generated to enhance the efficiency of the dose adaptation process. Finally, the dosing guideline was converted into an easy-to-use Excel^TM tool. The concept was applied to a total of 105 adult patients at the Centre for Integrated Oncology, Bonn, Germany. In total, 392 recommendations for dose adaptation were made and 320 (81.6%) recommendations were responded to by the oncologists. 98.4% of the recommendations were accepted. The algorithm simplifies the decision and screening process for high-risk patients. Moreover, it provides the possibility to quickly decide which laboratory tests are required and whether a dose adjustment for a particular anticancer drug is needed. The Excel^TM tool provides a recommended individual dose for patients with renal or hepatic dysfunction. The effectiveness of this strategy to reduce toxicity should be investigated in further studies before being adopted for routine use.

How I treat hepatitis C virus infection in patients with hematologic malignancies

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is not uncommon in cancer patients. Over the past 5 years, treatment of chronic HCV infection in patients with hematologic malignancies has evolved rapidly as safe and effective direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) have become the standard-of-care treatment. Today, chronic HCV infection should not prevent a patient from receiving cancer therapy or participating in clinical trials of chemotherapy because most infected patients can achieve virologic cure. Elimination of HCV from infected cancer patients confers virologic, hepatic, and oncologic advantages. Similar to the optimal therapy for HCV-infected patients without cancer, the optimal therapy for HCV-infected patients with cancer is evolving rapidly. The choice of regimens with DAAs should be individualized after thorough assessment for potential hematologic toxic effects and drug-drug interactions. This study presents clinical scenarios of HCV-infected patients with hematologic malignancies, focusing on diagnosis, clinical and laboratory presentations, complications, and DAA therapy. An up-to-date treatment algorithm is presented.

Drug-induced hepatotoxicity in cancer patients - implication for treatment

INTRODUCTION

All anticancer drugs can cause idiosyncratic liver injury. Therefore, hepatoprotective agents assume particular importance to preserve liver function. Hepatic injury represents 10% of cases of acute hepatitis in adults; drug-related damage is still misjudged because of relative clinical underestimation and difficult differential diagnosis. Chemotherapeutic agents can produce liver toxicity through different pathways, resulting in different categories of liver injuries, but these drugs are not homogeneously hepatotoxic. Frequently, anticancer-induced hepatotoxicity is idiosyncratic and influenced by multiple factors.

AREAS COVERED

The aim of this paper is to perform a review of the literature regarding anticancer-induced liver toxicity. We described hepatotoxicity mechanisms of principal anticancer agents and respective dose reductions. Furthermore, we reviewed studies on hepatoprotectors and their optimal use. Tiopronin, magnesium isoglycyrrhizinate and S-Adenosylmethionine (AdoMet) demonstrated, in some small studies, a potential hepatoprotective activity.

EXPERT OPINION

Actually, in the literature only small experiences are reported. Even though hepatoprotective agents seem to be useful in the oncologic setting, the lack of well-designed prospective Phase III randomized controlled trials is a major limit in the introduction of hepatoprotectors in cancer patients and these kind of studies are warranted to support their use and to give further recommendations for the clinical practice.

The Effect of Hepatic Impairment on Outcomes in Phase I Clinical Trials in Cancer Subjects

PURPOSE

The NCI Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program sponsors hepatic dysfunction phase I clinical trials (HDCT) and phase 1 clinical trials (P1CT) to determine safe doses and schedules of antineoplastic therapeutics. We sought to compare clinical outcomes between these trial types while stratifying by hepatotoxic agents.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Individual subject data were extracted from the records of 51 NCI-sponsored HDCT and P1CT. The NCI's Organ Dysfunction Working Group's hepatic impairment categorization and two drug-induced liver injury (DILI) scales (FDA R ratio and Hy's law) were used to classify subjects. The number of cycles administered and treatment discontinuation reason were also evaluated and compared between groups.

RESULTS

There were 513 and 1,328 subjects treated on HDCT (n = 9) and P1CT (n = 42), respectively. There were differing patterns of DILI with significant worsening of total bilirubin in subjects on HDCT, and worsening of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) in subjects on P1CT. Cholestatic peak patterns of liver impairment (predominant increases in alkaline phosphatase rather than transaminases) were more frequent in HDCT. Criteria for Hy's law were met by 11 subjects on P1CT, but not by any subjects on HDCT. Disease progression was the most common reason for treatment discontinuation, followed by adverse events at similar frequencies in both HDCT and P1CT.

CONCLUSIONS

The differential effects on hepatotoxicity suggest that underlying hepatic function may affect susceptibility to and patterns of DILI. The incorporation of additional measures of hepatic function may help identify those at highest risk of hepatotoxicity in future trials because baseline liver tests did not. Clin Cancer Res; 22(22); 5472-9. ©2016 AACR.

Cancer and liver cirrhosis: implications on prognosis and management

Liver cirrhosis, the end-stage of every chronic liver disease, is not only the major risk factor for the development of hepatocellular carcinoma but also a limiting factor for anticancer therapy of liver and non-hepatic malignancies. Liver cirrhosis may limit surgical and interventional approaches to cancer treatment, influence pharmacokinetics of anticancer drugs, increase side effects of chemotherapy, render patients susceptible for hepatotoxicity, and ultimately result in a competitive risk for morbidity and mortality. In this review, we provide a concise overview about the impact of liver cirrhosis on the management and prognosis of patients with primary liver cancer or non-hepatic malignancies.

Dose modifications in Asian cancer patients with hepatic dysfunction receiving weekly docetaxel: A prospective pharmacokinetic and safety study

Hepatic dysfunction may modify the safety profile and pharmacokinetics of docetaxel in cancer patients, but no validated guideline exists to guide dose modification necessitated by this uncommon comorbidity. We carried out the first prospective study of a personalized dosage regimen for cancer patients with liver dysfunction treated with docetaxel. Weekly dosages were stratified by hepatic dysfunction classification as such: Category 1, normal; Category 2, mild – alkaline phosphatase, aspartate aminotransferase, and/or alanine aminotransferase ≤5× upper limit of normal (ULN), and total bilirubin within normal range; and Category 3, moderate – any alkaline phosphatase, and aspartate aminotransferase or alanine aminotransferase ≤5–10× ULN, and/or total bilirubin ≤1–1.5× ULN. Category 1, 2 and 3 patients received starting dosages of 40, 30, and 20 mg/m² docetaxel, respectively. Pharmacokinetics were evaluated on day 1 and 8 of the first treatment cycle, and entered into a multilevel model to delineate interindividual and interoccasion variability. Adverse event evaluation was carried out weekly for two treatment cycles. We found that docetaxel clearance was significantly different between patient categories (P < 0.001). Median clearance was 22.8, 16.4, and 11.3 L/h/m² in Categories 1, 2, and 3, respectively, representing 28% and 50% reduced clearance in mild and moderate liver dysfunction patients, respectively. However, docetaxel exposure (area under the concentration–time curve) and docetaxel‐induced neutropenia (nadir and the maximum percentage decrease in neutrophil count) were not significantly different between categories. Median area under the concentration–time curve was 1.74, 1.83, and 1.77 mg·h/L in Categories 1, 2, and 3, respectively. The most common Grade 3/4 toxicity was neutropenia (30.0%). An unplanned comparison with the Child–Pugh and National Cancer Institute Organ Dysfunction Working Group grouping systems suggests that the proposed classification system appears to more effectively discriminate patients by docetaxel clearance and dose requirements. (ClinicalTrials.gov registration no. NCT00703378).

Optimal dose of gemcitabine for the treatment of biliary tract or pancreatic cancer in patients with liver dysfunction

A clear consensus does not exist about whether the initial dose of gemcitabine, an essential anticancer antimetabolite, should be reduced in patients with liver dysfunction. Adult patients with biliary tract or pancreatic cancer were divided into three groups according to whether they had mild, moderate, or severe liver dysfunction, evaluated on the basis of serum bilirubin and liver transaminase levels at baseline. As anticancer treatment, gemcitabine at a dose of 800 or 1000 mg/m(2) was given as an i.v. infusion once weekly for 3 weeks of a 4-week cycle. The patients were prospectively evaluated for adverse events during the first cycle, and the pharmacokinetics of gemcitabine and its inactive metabolite, difluorodeoxyuridine, were studied to determine the optimal initial dose of gemcitabine as monotherapy according to the severity of liver dysfunction. A total of 15 patients were studied. Liver dysfunction was mild in one patient, moderate in six, and severe in eight. All 15 patients had been undergoing biliary drainage for obstructive jaundice when they received gemcitabine. Grade 3 cholangitis developed in one patient with moderate liver dysfunction who received gemcitabine at the dose level of 1000 mg/m(2). No other patients had severe treatment-related adverse events resulting in the omission or discontinuation of gemcitabine treatment. The plasma concentrations of gemcitabine and difluorodeoxyuridine were similar among the groups. An initial dose reduction of gemcitabine as monotherapy for the treatment of biliary tract or pancreatic cancers is not necessary for patients with hyperbilirubinemia, provided that obstructive jaundice is well managed. (Clinical trial registration no. UMIN000005363.)

Patients with Advanced Pancreatic Cancer and Hyperbilirubinaemia: Review and German Expert Opinion on Treatment with nab-Paclitaxel plus Gemcitabine

In patients with advanced unresectable pancreatic cancer, the prognosis is generally poor. Within recent years, new treatment options such as the FOLFIRINOX regimen (5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, irinotecan and oxaliplatin) or the combination of nanoparticle albumin-bound (nab)-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine have shown a clinically relevant survival benefit over the standard gemcitabine in patients with good performance status. Unfortunately, patients with hyperbilirubinaemia, who constitute a substantial proportion of the pancreatic cancer patients, have been excluded from most clinical studies. Consequently, our knowledge on the appropriate medical treatment of this patient group is limited. In a meeting of German medical oncology experts, the available clinical evidence and own clinical experience regarding the management of patients with advanced pancreatic cancer and hyperbilirubinaemia was discussed. The present publication summarises the discussion outcomes with regard to appropriate management of these patients, including consensus-based recommendations for nab-paclitaxel/gemcitabine treatment, according to the best available evidence. In summary, knowledge of the underlying aetiology of hyperbilirubinaemia and the metabolisation routes of the cytotoxic drugs is crucial before initiating chemotherapy. As effective treatment options should also be made available to patients with comorbid conditions, including hyperbilirubinaemia, the experts provide advice for an initial dose reduction of chemotherapy with nab-paclitaxel/gemcitabine based on the total bilirubin level in patients with biliary obstruction or extensive liver metastasis.

Hepatotoxicity of molecular targeted therapy

A constant increase in occurrence of neoplasms is observed; hence new methods of therapy are being intensively researched. One of the methods of antineoplastic treatment is molecular targeted therapy, which aims to influence individual processes occurring in cells. Using this type of medications is associated with unwanted effects resulting from the treatment. Liver damage is a major adverse effect diagnosed during targeted therapy. Drug-induced liver damage can occur as necrosis of hepatocytes, cholestatic liver damage and cirrhosis. Hepatotoxicity is evaluated on the basis of International Consensus Criteria. Susceptibility of the liver to injury is connected not only with toxicity of the used medications but also with metastasis, coexistence of viral infections or other chronic diseases as well as the patient's age. It has been proven that in most cases the liver injury is caused by treatment with multikinase inhibitors, in particular tyrosine kinase inhibitors. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) ordered the inclusion of additional labels – so-called “black box warnings” – indicating increased risk of liver injury when treating with pazopanib, sunitinib, lapatinib and regorafenib. A meta-analysis published in 2013 showed that treating neoplastic patients with tyrosine kinase inhibitors can increase the risk of drug-induced liver damage at least twofold. Below the mechanisms of drug-induced liver injury and hepatotoxic effects of molecular targeted therapy are described.

Yttrium-90 radioembolization stops progression of targeted breast cancer liver metastases after failed chemotherapy

PURPOSE

To determine, in an open-label, retrospective report, the safety and effectiveness of locoregional therapy with yttrium-90 ((90)Y) radioembolization for patients with progressing breast cancer liver metastases (BCLMs) despite multi-agent chemotherapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Seventy-five patients with progressing BCLMs and stable extrahepatic disease were treated with radioembolization at a single institution. Retrospective review of a prospectively collected database was performed to evaluate clinical and biochemical toxicities, tumor response, overall survival (OS), and time to progression. Radiologic response assessments included Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors in primary index lesions and metabolic activity on positron emission tomography (PET). Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed.

RESULTS

The mortality rate at 30 days was 4% (n = 3). Clinical toxicity and hyperbilirubinemia of grade 3 or worse occurred in 7.6% (n = 5) and 5.9% of patients (n = 4), respectively. Partial response (PR) was seen in 35.3% of patients (n = 24), stable disease (SD) in 63.2% (n = 43), and progressive disease in 1.5% (n = 1). PET imaging was available in 25 patients, and 21 (84%) had a complete response, PR, or SD. The median OS was 6.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.0-9.2 mo). The hazard ratio (HR) for OS on multivariate analysis was 0.39 (95% CI, 0.23-0.66) for tumor burden less than 25% compared with greater burden. Elevated bilirubin levels were shown to reduce OS. The HR for hepatic progression was 0.22 (95% CI, 0.05-0.98) for solitary versus multifocal disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Locoregional therapy with (90)Y radioembolization is safe and stops or delays the progression of targeted chemorefractory BCLMs. Adverse prognosticators were identified.

Long-term influence of chemotherapy on steatosis-associated advanced hepatic fibrosis

To determine whether chemotherapy treatment at least 6 months prior to the detection of hepatic steatosis is associated with advanced hepatic fibrosis. Demographics, comorbid conditions, and laboratory data for cancer patients with hepatic steatosis were reviewed. The primary end point of this study was a low probability of fibrosis as calculated by the AST-to-platelet ratio index (APRI)-a surrogate for the absence of histologic bridging fibrosis and/or cirrhosis. Of 279 patients, 117 (41.9 %) were treated with chemotherapy and 197 (66.3 %) had a low probability of fibrosis by APRI. A smaller proportion of patients treated with chemotherapy had a low probability of hepatic fibrosis compared with untreated patients (64.1 vs. 75.3 %, p = 0.04). On multivariable analysis, chemotherapy treatment was a negative predictive factor for a low probability of fibrosis (OR 0.366 [95 % CI 0.184-0.708], p < 0.01). Among chemotherapy-treated patients, 75 (64.1 %) had a low probability of fibrosis. There were no differences in chemotherapy duration (mean 7.8 vs. 7.5 cycles) and interval from last dose to steatosis diagnosis (24.3 vs. 21.4 months) between patients with and without a low probability of fibrosis. A smaller proportion of patients treated with irinotecan or 5-fluorouracil had a low probability of fibrosis (37.3 vs. 66.7 %, p = 0.04). On multivariable analysis, irinotecan or 5-fluorouracil treatment was a negative predictive factor for low probability of fibrosis (OR 0.277 [95 % CI 0.091-0.779], p = 0.02). Prior chemotherapy treatment, especially with 5-fluorouracil or irinotecan, is a negative predictor for the absence of advanced hepatic fibrosis among patients with steatosis.

A systematic review of sorafenib in Child-Pugh A patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND AND GOALS

Several studies have demonstrated that sorafenib is effective in the treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We performed a systematic review of the efficacy and safety of sorafenib in Child-Pugh A patients with unresectable HCC. The value of sorafenib treatment in different subgroups was examined.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A search of the literature published up to July 2012 was conducted. Pubmed, Embase, and the Cochrane library were searched and only randomized controlled trials were included.

RESULTS

Five randomized controlled trials consisting of 1462 patients with unresectable HCC were included. Meta-analyses demonstrated that sorafenib improved the control rate of the disease [relative risk, 1.85; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.55, 2.20; P<0.001], decreased the risk for tumor progression (hazard ratios, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.51, 0.73; P<0.001), and decreased mortality (hazard ratios, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.56, 0.89; P<0.001), relative to placebo. Subgroup analyses indicated that sorafenib-based treatments were effective in unresectable HCC regardless of the etiology, performance status, Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer-stage, alanine transaminase/asparate transaminase, bilirubin, and α-feto protein level, except in the subgroup of prior local therapy. Sorafenib was associated with a higher risk of adverse effects than placebo. The risk for grade 3-4 hand-foot skin reactions, rash or desquamation, diarrhea, and hypertension was much higher in the sorafenib treatment group. These side effects could often be mitigated with appropriate treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Sorafenib was a moderately effective and safe oral drug for use in Child-Pugh A patients with unresectable HCC. Sorafenib monotherapy is not recommended for treating intermediate-stage HCC. More research is needed on the efficacy of sorafenib treatment in patients with prior local therapy.

Safety and pharmacology of gemcitabine and capecitabine in patients with advanced pancreatico-biliary cancer and hepatic dysfunction

PURPOSE

We assessed the impact of hepatic dysfunction on the safety and pharmacology of gemcitabine/capecitabine in patients with advanced pancreatico-biliary cancer.

METHODS

We included 12 patients receiving 3 weekly gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) day 1, 8 and oral capecitabine 650 mg/m(2) b.i.d. over 2 weeks until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. Patients were included into one normal hepatic function cohort [total bilirubin (TB) ≤15 μmol/L] and 3 cohorts with increasing TB (16-39, 40-80, >80 μmol/L). Three patients with a creatinine clearance <60 ml/min were also included. Patients were sampled for gemcitabine, difluoro-deoxy uridine, intracellular gemcitabine triphosphates, capecitabine, 5'-deoxy-5-fluorocytidine, 5'-deoxy-5-fluorouridine and 5-fluorouracil up to 4 h after initiation of chemotherapy on day 1, and up to 90 min on day 8. All compounds were analyzed using validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Nonlinear mixed-effect modeling was used for population analysis.

RESULTS

Hepatic dysfunction was caused by intrahepatic cholestasis in 4 out of 8 patients (50 %) and extrahepatic cholestasis in another 4 patients (50 %). Dose-limiting toxicity was increasing hyperbilirubinemia and severe neutropenia in 2 patients each. Hepatic dysfunction was not associated with dose-limiting toxicity or severe hematological or non-hematological toxicity. However, hepatic dysfunction was associated with low clearance of both gemcitabine (p = 10(-3)) and capecitabine (p = 10(-5)), and low intracellular gemcitabine triphosphate concentrations (p = 10(-3)).

CONCLUSIONS

Gemcitabine/capecitabine can be given at the standard dose in patients with severe hyperbilirubinemia, though the present data suggest that gemcitabine's activity may be limited due to poor intracellular activation. In patients with severe hyperbilirubinemia, initial monotherapy with capecitabine should be considered, followed by the addition of gemcitabine with improving hyperbilirubinemia.

Gefitinib frequently induces liver damage in patients with lung adenocarcinoma previously treated by chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Gefitinib is known as one of the agents for treating patients with both advanced lung cancer and an epidermal growth-factor receptor mutation. In the epidermal growth-factor receptor-mutant advanced non-small-cell lung cancer population, gefitinib therapy has been associated with increased response rate, longer progression-free survival, and better quality of life compared to other anticancer drugs. However, gefitinib has to be discontinued for patients in whom adverse events occur, even if it is still effective. Here, we retrospectively assessed the clinical course of patients receiving gefitinib therapy, with a particular focus on liver damage.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Of 24 Asian patients treated with 250 mg gefitinib daily at Kanagawa National Hospital, Japan, between January 2008 and June 2012, grade 3 liver damage (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.0) occurred in nine and were eligible for our assessment. The regimen was subsequently changed to alternate-day administration. The relationships between liver damage and each clinical factor were retrospectively examined using Fisher's exact test.

RESULTS

Of the nine patients with liver damage, seven had previous exposure to another anticancer drug. There was a significant relationship between the incidence of liver damage and previous chemotherapy (P = 0.009). The objective response rates of patients treated with daily gefitinib 250 mg and alternate-day gefitinib following liver damage were 66.7% and 46.7%, respectively; these were not significantly different (P = 0.597).

CONCLUSION

Gefitinib for advanced adenocarcinoma patients who have previously undergone chemotherapy should be used cautiously and liver function monitored closely, because it frequently induces significant liver damage. The alternate-day administration of gefitinib may be a suitable option for patients in whom daily gefitinib therapy induces liver damage.

Bp44mT: an orally active iron chelator of the thiosemicarbazone class with potent anti-tumour efficacy

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Our previous studies demonstrated that a thiosemicarbazone iron chelator (di-2-pyridylketone-4,4-dimethyl-3-thiosemicarbazone; Dp44mT) possesses potent and selective anti-cancer activity but led to cardiotoxicity at non-optimal doses. In this study, we examined the in vivo anti-tumour efficacy and tolerability of a new-generation 2-benzoylpyridine thiosemicarbazone iron chelator (2-benzoylpyridine-4,4-dimethyl-3-thiosemicarbazone; Bp44mT) administered via the oral or i.v. routes.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

BpT chelators were tested in vitro against human lung cancer cells (DMS-53) and in vivo in DMS-53 tumour xenografts in mice. The toxicity of Bp44mT in vivo and its effects on the expression of iron-regulated molecules involved in growth and cell cycle control were investigated.

KEY RESULTS

Administration of Bp44mT by either route resulted in marked dose-dependent inhibition of tumour growth. When administered at 50 mg·kg(-1) via oral gavage three times per week for 23 days, the net xenograft growth was inhibited by 75%, compared with vehicle-treated mice. Toxicological examination showed reversible alterations including slight reduction of RBC count, with a decrease of liver and splenic iron levels, which confirmed iron chelation in vivo. Importantly, in contrast to Dp44mT, the chelator-treated mice did not show cardiac histological abnormalities. There was also no significant weight loss in mice, suggesting oral administration of Bp44mT was well tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

This is the first study to show that Bp44mT can be given orally with potent anti-tumour efficacy. Oral administration of a novel and effective chemotherapeutic agent provides the benefits of convenience for chronic dosing regimens.

‘Les liaisons dangereuses’: Hepatitis C, Rituximab and B-cell non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas

Rituximab has provided a revolutionary contribution to the treatment of B-cell non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas (NHL). A high prevalence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection has been described in B-cell NHL patients. Cases of liver dysfunction in HCV-positive patients have been reported with Rituximab-containing regimens. In this paper we review the recent data regarding the effects of Rituximab in NHL patients with HCV infection. We also added a section devoted to improving communication between oncohaematologists and hepatologists. Furthermore, we propose a common methodological ground to study hepatic toxicity emerging during chemotherapy.

Should cirrhosis change our attitude towards treating non-hepatic cancer?

Cirrhosis is a major cause of morbidity and mortality and is the end stage of any chronic liver disease. Cancer, a leading cause of death worldwide, is a growing global health issue. There are limited data in the literature on the incidence, prevalence and management of non-hepatic cancers (NHC) in cirrhotic patients. The aim of this brief review was to underline the main concerns, pitfalls and warnings regarding practice for these patients. Survival of patients with compensated cirrhosis is significantly longer than that of decompensated cirrhosis and patients with NHC and in Child-Pugh class C should not be candidates for cytotoxic chemotherapy. It is important before starting cytotoxic chemotherapy to assess the aetiology and stage of liver disease and to screen these patients for portal hypertension and fluid retention. During cytotoxic chemotherapy, the effectiveness of cancer treatment, as well the appearance of early signs of hepatic decompensation, must be thoroughly monitored. Future phase 3 trial designs in oncology should include a share of patients with compensated cirrhosis to obtain specific information in this setting. Identification of tests able to measure the global degree of hepatic impairment caused by cirrhosis could help in the management of this particular clinical situation.

5FU continuous infusion in heavily pretreated advanced breast cancer patients

BACKGROUND

Despite advances in the first- and secondline treatment of advanced breast cancer, optimal therapy thereafter remains controversial. Treatment of heavily pretreated patients is not standardized, often of low efficacy, and limited by comorbidity. In these patients, an effective treatment with low toxicity is needed.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed all metastatic breast cancer patients treated with 5-fluorouracil as continuous infusion (CI-5FU) with daily doses of 150-300 mg/m(2).

RESULTS

43 patients were treated with CI-5FU until disease progression. The median number of metastatic sites was 3. Most patients were heavily pretreated with a median of 3 palliative chemotherapies (range 1-11). 42 patients were evaluable for objective response; among them 5 (12%) showed a partial response (PR) and 6 (15%) showed stable disease (SD) lasting at least 6 months, leading to a clinical benefit (CB) rate (complete response + PR + SD ≥ 6 months) of 27%. The median time to progression of patients with CB was 10 months (range 3-22). Overall survival of all patients from the start of CI-5FU was 8 months (range 1-75) and from the time of first metastases 42 months (range 9-281). Toxicity was low even in patients with hepatic insufficiency.

CONCLUSION

CI-5FU showed a positive efficacy/toxicity ratio. Taking into account the high number of previous treatments, it results in a remarkable CB rate of 27%.

Effect of dimethylnitrosamine-induced liver dysfunction on the pharmacokinetics of 5-fluorouracil after administration of S-1, an antitumour drug, to rats

OBJECTIVES

The anti-tumour agent S-1 comprises tegafur (a prodrug of 5-fluorouracil; 5-FU), gimeracil (2-chloro-2,4-dihydroxypyridine (CDHP); a competitive inhibitor of 5-FU metabolism) and oteracil potassium. The effect of hepatic dysfunction induced by dimethylnitrosamine (DMN) on the pharmacokinetics of 5-FU after administration of S-1 to rats was investigated.

METHODS

S-1 (5 mg/kg) was administered intravenously and orally to rats with DMN-induced liver dysfunction. Plasma concentrations of S-1 components and 5-FU were measured by HPLC and LC/MS-MS. Blood tests and in-vitro enzymatic investigations were also conducted.

KEY FINDINGS

DMN treatment induced hepatic dysfunction and decreased the conversion of tegafur to 5-FU in the liver without altering renal function or dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase activity. Following intravenous administration of S-1, the blood concentration-time profiles of CDHP were similar between control rats and rats with hepatic dysfunction, but the half-life of tegafur was significantly prolonged. The maximum plasma concentration (C(max)) of 5-FU was significantly reduced and the area under the blood concentration-time curve (AUC) was reduced by 22%. Following oral administration, the C(max) of tegafur, 5-FU and CDHP were significantly decreased and half-lives significantly increased. Hepatic dysfunction had a less pronounced effect on the AUC of 5-FU (13.6% reduction).

CONCLUSIONS

The pharmacokinetic profiles of tegafur, 5-FU and CDHP were altered by changes in the elimination rate of tegafur induced by a decrease in the conversion of tegafur to 5-FU. However, hepatic dysfunction had less of an effect on the AUC of 5-FU, which correlates with anti-tumour effect, after the oral administration of S-1.

Toxicities of gemcitabine in patients with severe hepatic dysfunction

OBJECTIVE

To determine the relationship between doses of gemcitabine and absolute neutrophil count and thrombocytopenia in patients with severe hepatic dysfunction (total bilirubin > or =4.5 mg/dL), and the relationship between doses of gemcitabine in patients with severe hepatic dysfunction and nonhematologic toxicity.

CASE SUMMARY

A retrospective chart review was conducted for patients receiving gemcitabine at the Medical University of South Carolina from October 2006 through October 2008. Seven patients were identified who had an elevated total bilirubin level (> or =4.5 mg/dL) at the time they were receiving gemcitabine. All 7 patients received gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) throughout their treatment, regardless of liver function. Six patients did not experience significant hematologic toxicity warranting a dose reduction or a dose being held. One patient developed thrombocytopenia, warranting a dose being held.

DISCUSSION

Gemcitabine is a chemotherapy agent frequently used for the treatment of pancreatic cancer as well as metastatic breast, lung, and ovarian cancer. To date there is limited information on dosing of gemcitabine in patients with an elevated total bilirubin. A previous study looking at lower grades of liver dysfunction suggested empiric dose reductions be made in these patients because of increased incidence of toxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

These results indicate the possibility that no initial dose reduction is necessary for patients with liver dysfunction receiving gemcitabine; however, close monitoring of these patients is required.

Association of C-reactive protein levels and long-term survival after neoadjuvant therapy and esophagectomy for esophageal cancer

BACKGROUND

Preoperative C-reactive protein (CRP) levels have been shown to be prognostic markers of survival in patients undergoing esophagectomy for cancer. No study has evaluated the predictive value for survival of CRP levels after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.

METHODS

Preoperative CRP levels were assessed in patients undergoing neoadjuvant therapy and esophagectomy for cancer. Groups were defined according to normal value cutoffs of the CRP measurements.

RESULTS

Seventy patients had normal CRP, and 20 patients had raised CRP. The groups did not differ in descriptives, comorbidities, white cell counts, pathological data, or morbidity. In-hospital death was higher in the raised CRP group (three versus one patient, p = 0.048). The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed a significant survival advantage of patients with normal CRP compared to patients with raised CRP levels (median survival, 65.4 versus 18.7 months; log rank test, p = 0.027). The Cox regression analysis identified three independent prognostic factors for survival: UICC stage (IIB/III versus I/IIA, HR 3.48, p = 0.007), completeness of resection (HR 6.33, p = 0.002), and CRP levels (raised versus normal, HR 5.07, p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Preoperative CRP levels are an independent prognostic marker for survival after neoadjuvant treatment in patients with esophageal cancer and may be of value in the re-staging process after neoadjuvant treatment.

Unintended hepatic adverse events associated with cancer chemotherapy

Chemotherapy is meant to be toxic, but it is particularly aimed at the tumor cells. Collateral damage may occur to normal cells and tissues, especially if they are fairly rapidly regenerating, as is the case for bone marrow cells, intestinal epithelial cells, and liver cells after hepatic injury. The liver has a great capacity to resist injury, overcome it, and to regenerate, even after quite massive injury (resection of 50%-65%, for example). This capacity may make it susceptible to chemotherapeutic toxicity, and a struggle between injury and adaptation, leading to recovery and tolerance or to failure and death. If the chemotherapy is aimed just at delaying progression of the cancer for a few weeks or months, it may not be worth the risk of irreversible liver injury developing in that time. Close clinical observation and sound clinical judgment are required.

Drug-induced liver injury: what was new in 2008?

BACKGROUND

Given the number of publications appearing annually regarding drug-induced liver injury (DILI), there remains a need to concisely summarize each year's new crop of case series and reports as well as the advances in mechanisms of liver injury and in the field of pharmacogenomics relating to DILI.

OBJECTIVE

To present an up-to-date review of the past year's most important clinical studies and reports of DILI, placing them into context of previous publications.

METHODS

A Medline search was conducted of all manuscripts appearing in the fields "hepatotoxicity" and "drug-induced liver injury" during the calendar year 2008. The most clinically relevant English language case reports and studies exploring mechanisms and risk factors for DILI were then chosen for review, and supplemented with older literature where appropriate.

CONCLUSIONS

As in past years, 2008 was replete with publications dealing with virtually all facets of DILI, including updated incidence and prevalence data, as well as the latest information regarding mechanisms of liver injury. Data from the first 300 patients in the National Institute of Health-sponsored DILI Network registry of > 100 non-acetaminophen causes were presented. Antimicrobials and CNS drugs were responsible for > 60% of cases, with herbals and dietary supplements being increasingly reported. Identification of genetic predispositions to DILI is coming of age with the FDA calling for the testing of human leukocyte antigen B(*)5701 before the use of abacavir to reduce the risk of hypersensitivity reactions. Several groups emphasized the pitfalls in utilizing Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method and other causality assessment methodologies, and an updated review appeared on the use of potentially hepatotoxic medications in patients with underlying liver disease.

Weekly cisplatin may reverse liver dysfunction and jaundice caused by diffuse liver metastases of solid tumors

Few data are available on patient management in jaundice caused by liver metastases of solid tumors (nonbreast and noncolon origin). We report the first patient series consecutively treated with cisplatin weekly in patients with severe jaundice and liver failure due to underlying metastatic neoplasms. In 4 out of 8 cases, liver function tests were reversed and jaundice disappeared, permitting subsequent standard chemotherapy. The other 4 patients died 3 to 5 weeks after admission, illustrating the extent and severity of the underlying neoplasm.