Whole-brain irradiation for patients with brain metastases: still the standard of care

Efficacy and safety of recombinant human endostatin combined with whole-brain radiation therapy in patients with brain metastases from non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Brain metastasis (BM) is the leading cause of poor prognosis in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. To date, whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT) is a standard treatment for patients with multiple BMs, while its effectiveness is currently unsatisfactory. This study aimed to investigate the effects of Rh-endostatin combined with WBRT on NSCLC patients with BMs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 43 patients with BM were randomly divided into two groups. The Rh-endostatin combination group (n=19) received Rh-endostatin combined with WBRT, and the radiation group (n=24) received WBRT only. The primary endpoint of the study was progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary endpoints were intracranial progression free survival (iPFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and changes in the cerebral blood volume (CBV) and cerebral blood flow (CBF).

RESULTS

Median PFS (mPFS) was 8.1 months in the Rh-endostatin combination group and 4.9 months in the radiation group (95%CI 0.2612-0.9583, p=0·0428). Besides, the median iPFS was 11.6 months in the Rh-endostatin combination group and 4.8 months in the radiation group (95%CI 0.2530-0.9504, p=0·0437). OS was 14.2 months in the Rh-endostatin combination group and 6.4 months in the radiation group (95%CI 0.2508-1.026, p=0·0688). CBV and CBF in the Rh-endostatin combination group were better improved than that in the radiation group, which indicated that Rh-endostatin might improve local blood supply and microcirculation.

CONCLUSION

Rh-endostatin showed better survival and improved cerebral perfusion parameters, which may provide further insights into the application of Rh-endostatin for NSCLC patients with BMs.

AZD3759 enhances radiation effects in non-small-cell lung cancer by a synergistic blockade of epidermal growth factor receptor and Janus kinase-1

AZD3759 is a novel epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) on the basis of gefitinib and has been proven to enter the central nervous system. Although the promising antitumor effects of AZD3759 on non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have been demonstrated in clinical trials, the regulatory effects of this inhibitor on the antitumor efficacy of radiation (RA) are unclear. The present study aimed to compare the effects of AZD3759 and osimertinib on RA efficacy in NSCLC and explore the potential mechanism of action of AZD3759. We found that the survival in RA-treated NSCLC cells was significantly decreased by treatment with 500 nM AZD3759 and osimertinib at the RA dosage of 8 Gy. The apoptotic rate, cell cycle arrest, and DNA damage in RA-treated NSCLC cells and brain metastasis in RA-treated xenograft nude mice were significantly enhanced by the co-administration of AZD3759 and osimertinib, respectively. In addition, AZD3759 showed a significantly stronger efficacy than osimertinib did. Mechanistically, the receptor tyrosine kinase signaling antibody array revealed that Janus kinase-1 (JAK1) was specifically inhibited by AZD3759, but not by osimertinib. The effects of AZD3759 on RA efficacy in PC-9 cells and in a brain metastasis animal model were significantly abolished by the overexpression of JAK1. Collectively, our results suggested that AZD3759 promoted RA antitumor effects in NSCLC by synergistic blockade of EGFR and JAK1.

Concurrent Bronchial Artery and Posterior Inferior Cerebellar Artery Microcatheter Interventional Chemotherapy for Adenocarcinoma of the Lung with Solitary Cerebellar Metastasis

Background

Lung cancer with intracranial metastasis requires concurrent treatment of the primary lung tumor and the secondary brain tumor. This study aimed to investigate the short-term clinical efficacy of concurrent bronchial artery and posterior inferior cerebellar artery microcatheter interventional chemotherapy for the treatment of adenocarcinoma of the lung with solitary cerebellar metastasis.

Material/Methods

Seventeen patients with adenocarcinoma of the lung with solitary cerebellar metastasis received concurrent microcatheter interventional chemotherapy via the bronchial artery and posterior inferior cerebellar artery. Two cycles of treatment with teniposide (VM-26), carmustine (BCNU), carboplatin (CBP), and pirarubicin (THP) were performed every four weeks.

Results

Four patients (23.53%) achieved a complete response (CR), five patients (29.41%) achieved a partial response (PR), seven patients (41.18%) had stable disease (SD), and only one patient (5.88%) developed progressive disease (PD). The objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were 52.94% (9/17) and 94.12% (16/17), respectively. Four patients (11.76%) developed grade 1/2 chemotherapy toxicity, which included three cases (8.82%) of gastrointestinal toxicity and one case (2.84%) of granulocytopenia, but no grade 3/4 toxicity was found. During microcatheter interventional chemotherapy, three patients (8.82%) developed intracranial complications, including two cases (5.88%) of cerebrovascular spasm and one case (2.94%) of cerebral edema.

Conclusions

In 17 patients with adenocarcinoma of the lung with solitary cerebellar metastasis, concurrent microcatheter interventional chemotherapy via the bronchial artery and posterior inferior cerebellar artery was safe and showed short-term efficacy.

Whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) after local treatment of brain metastases in melanoma patients: Statistical Analysis Plan

Background

The WBRTMel trial is a multinational, open-label, phase III randomised controlled trial comparing whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) to observation following local treatment of one to three melanoma brain metastases with surgery and/or stereotactic irradiation. The primary trial endpoint was to determine the effect of adding WBRT to local treatment on distant intracranial control, and the secondary endpoints were neurocognitive function, quality of life (QoL), performance status, overall survival, death from intracranial causes, death from melanoma and cost-effectiveness.

Objective

The objective of this update is to outline and publish the pre-determined statistical analysis plan (SAP) before the database lock and the start of analysis.

Methods

The SAP describes basic analysis principles, methods for dealing with a range of commonly encountered data analysis issues and the specific statistical procedures for analysing efficacy and safety outcomes. The SAP was approved after closure of recruitment and before completion of patient follow-up. It outlines the planned primary analyses and a range of subgroup and sensitivity analyses regarding the clinical and QoL outcomes. Health economic outcomes are not included in this plan but will be analysed separately. The SAP will be adhered to for the final data analysis of this trial to avoid analysis bias arising from knowledge of the data.

Results

The resulting SAP is consistent with best practice and will allow open and transparent reporting.

Conclusion

We have developed a SAP for the WBRTMel trial which will be followed to ensure high-quality standards of internal validity to minimise analysis bias.

Trial registration

ANZ Clinical Trials Registry, ACTRN12607000512426. Registered on 9 October 2007. ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01503827. Registered on 4 January 2012. Trial group reference numbers ANZMTG 01.07, TROG 08.05.

[Prognostic Analysis of EGFR-TKIs Combined with Gamma Knife in EGFR-mutant Lung Adenocarcinoma with Brain Metastasis]

背景与目的

晚期表皮生长因子受体（epidermal growth factor receptor, EGFR）基因突变的肺腺癌在初诊或治疗过程中脑转移的总发生率高，局部治疗联合系统性靶向治疗可能是更佳策略。本研究拟探讨分析EGFR酪氨酸激酶抑制剂（tyrosine kinase inhibitors, TKIs）联合头颅伽玛刀治疗EGFR突变的肺腺癌伴脑转移患者的疗效及预后因素。

方法

回顾性收集EGFR基因突变的肺腺癌、在初诊即存在脑转移或在EGFR-TKIs治疗过程中肺部病灶稳定而出现脑转移、接受一线口服EGFR-TKIs靶向治疗联合脑部伽玛刀局部治疗的患者，评价EGFR-TKIs联合头颅伽马刀治疗对颅内病灶的疗效，随访并分析颅内无进展生存时间（intracranial progression free survival, i-PFS），探索EGFR突变肺腺癌伴脑转移的预后因素。

结果

共纳入74例患者，其中位i-PFS为14.7个月，1年无颅内进展率为58.5%，2年无颅内进展率为22.2%。颅内病灶与肺部病灶具有相近的进展时间。单因素生存分析显示，初诊癌胚抗原（carcinoembryonic antigen, CEA）水平 < 10 ng/mL（16.9个月vs 12.6个月，P=0.012）、颅内病灶长径 < 2 cm（15.4个月vs 10.8个月，P=0.021）、肺癌脑转移分级预后系统（lung graded prognostic assessment, Lung-molGPA）评分 > 3（15个月vs 12.6个月，P=0.041）的患者具有更长的i-PFS。多因素分析显示初诊时CEA≥10 ng/mL和颅内病灶≥2 cm是i-PFS的不良预后因素。

结论

EGFR-TKIs联合伽玛刀局部治疗对EGFR突变肺腺癌伴脑转移患者的颅内病灶具有良好的疗效。初诊时CEA水平≥10 ng/mL、颅内病灶≥2 cm是接受EGFR-TKIs联合伽马刀治疗的脑转移肺腺癌患者的不良预后因素。

Local recurrence of brain metastasis reduced by intra-operative hyperthermia treatment

PURPOSE

Brain metastasis is a common complication in cancer patients. Local recurrence after total resection of metastatic brain tumor has been frequently reported. In this study, we developed a new hyperthermia device and applied it to metastatic brain tumor patients intra-operatively to study if hyperthermia treatment could reduce local tumor recurrence.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 63 metastatic brain patients were enrolled in the study with an informed consent obtained from every patient. After total resection of the tumor, the hyperthermia device was applied intra-operatively to the resection cavity. The surrounding brain tissue at 5 mm in depth from the tumor resection margin was raised to 42.5 °C for a total of 60 minutes (Clinical Research Information Service Registration Number: KCT0001308).

RESULTS

A total of 10 local recurrences were observed in 63 patients who received hyperthermia treatment showing a local recurrence rate of 15.8%. It was significantly lower than the local recurrence rate of those who received conventional treatment (34%) when analyzed with one tailed z-test (p value: .001). Kaplan-Meier analysis also showed a significantly lower recurrence rate in the hyperthermia treatment group (p value: .0003). Complications included two cases of seizures and two cases of wound infection.

CONCLUSIONS

Results of this study suggest that intra-operative hyperthermia treatment after total resection of metastatic brain tumor could reduce local recurrence of tumor. We believe that intra-operative hyperthermia treatment could be used as an adjuvant therapy to surgery and post-operative radiotherapy, or as a salvage treatment in patients who cannot receive further radiotherapy.

Cognitive effects of stereotactic radiosurgery in adult patients with brain metastases: A systematic review

PURPOSE

Stereotactic radiation surgery (SRS) is increasingly applied in patients with brain metastases (BM) and is expected to have fewer adverse effects on cognitive functioning than whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT). Patients with BM are often confronted with a relatively short life expectancy, and the prevention or delay of cognitive decline to maintain quality of life is a clinically and highly relevant treatment goal. This review systematically and specifically evaluates the current literature on the cognitive effects of SRS in patients with BM.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Published trials on SRS alone or in combination with WBRT, including objective assessment of cognitive functioning, were identified through a systematic search of the PubMed database up to March 2018.

RESULTS

Of the 241 records screened, 14 studies matched the selection criteria: 2 pilot studies, 7 single-group/observational trials (1 study update), and 5 randomized trials (1 secondary analysis).

CONCLUSIONS

In general, the results show little to no objective cognitive decline up to 4 months after SRS compared with WBRT. However, most trials suffered from methodologic limitations that hindered reliable conclusions. Most importantly, few studies investigated the specific cognitive effects of SRS alone or versus WBRT. Furthermore, disentangling the cognitive effects of SRS from the effects of the disease itself and from the effects of other treatments remains very difficult. By presenting this comprehensive review, we aim to encourage researchers to probe deeper into this area and to do so in a standardized and methodologically optimal manner. The ultimate objective of this line of research is to inform both doctors and patients more precisely about the cognitive effects they can expect from treatment. This study is expected to improve the quality of decision-making and maximize clinical outcomes for each individual patient.

Neurocognitive assessment following whole brain radiation therapy and radiosurgery for patients with cerebral metastases

The treatment of metastatic brain lesions remains a central challenge in oncology. Because most chemotherapeutic agents do not effectively cross the blood-brain barrier, it is widely accepted that radiation remains the primary modality of treatment. The mode by which radiation should be delivered has, however, become a source of intense controversy in recent years. The controversy involves whether patients with a limited number of brain metastases should undergo whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) or stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) delivered only to the radiographically visible tumours. Survival is comparable for patients treated with either modality. Instead, the controversy involves the neurocognitive function (NCF) of radiating cerebrum that appeared radiographically normal relative to effects of the growth from micro-metastatic foci. A fundamental question in this debate involves quantifying the effect of WBRT in patients with cerebral metastasis. To disentangle the effects of WBRT on neurocognition from the effects inherent to the underlying disease, we analysed the results from randomised controlled studies of prophylactic cranial irradiation in oncology patients as well as studies where patients with limited cerebral metastasis were randomised to SRS versus SRS+WBRT. In aggregate, these results suggest deleterious effects of WBRT in select neurocognitive domains. However, there are insufficient data to resolve the controversy of upfront WBRT versus SRS in the management of patients with limited cerebral metastases.

Adjuvant whole brain radiation following resection of brain metastases

Brain metastasis is a common complication of systemic cancer and significant cause of suffering in oncology patients. Despite a plethora of available treatment modalities, the prognosis is poor with a median survival time of approximately one year. For patients with controlled systemic disease, good performance status, and a limited number of metastases, treatment typically entails surgical resection or radiosurgery, followed by whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) to control microscopic disease. WBRT is known to control the progression of cancer in the brain, but it can also have toxic effects, particularly with regard to neurocognition. There is no consensus as to whether the benefit of WBRT outweighs the potential harm. We review the evidence related to the question of whether patients undergoing surgical resection of brain metastases should receive adjuvant WBRT.

Future directions in treatment of brain metastases

BACKGROUND

Brain metastases affect up to 30% of patients with cancer. Management of brain metastases continues to evolve with ever increasing focus on cognitive preservation and quality of life. This manuscript reviews current state of brain metastases management and discusses various treatment controversies with focus on future clinical trials. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) are discussed in context of multiple (4+ brain metastases) as well as new approaches combining radiation and targeted agents. A brief discussion of modified WBRT approaches, including hippocampal-avoidance WBRT (HA-WBRT) is included as well as a section on recently presented results of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 0614, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of menantine for prevention of neurocognitive injury after WBRT.

METHODS

A search of selected studies relevant to management of brain metastases was performed in PubMed as well as in various published meeting abstracts. This data was collated and analyzed in context of contemporary management and future clinical trial plans. This data is presented in tabular form and discussed extensively in the text.

RESULTS

The published data demonstrate continued evolution of clinical trials and management strategies designed to minimize and/or prevent cognitive decline following radiation therapy management of brain metastases. Hippocampal avoidance whole-brain radiation therapy (HA-WBRT) and radiosurgery treatments for multiple brain metastases are discussed along with preliminary results of RTOG 0614, a trial of memantine therapy to prevent cognitive decline following WBRT. Trial results appear to support the use of memantine for prevention of cognitive decline.

CONCLUSIONS

Different management strategies for multiple brain metastases (>4 brain metastases) are currently being evaluated in prospective clinical trials to minimize the likelihood of cognitive decline following WBRT.

Neurocognitive function impairment after whole brain radiotherapy for brain metastases: actual assessment

Whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) is an effective treatment in brain metastases and, when combined with local treatments such as surgery and stereotactic radiosurgery, gives the best brain control. Nonetheless, WBRT is often omitted after local treatment due to its potential late neurocognitive effects. Publications on radiation-induced neurotoxicity have used different assessment methods, time to assessment, and definition of impairment, thus making it difficult to accurately assess the rate and magnitude of the neurocognitive decline that can be expected. In this context, and to help therapeutic decision making, we have conducted this literature review, with the aim of providing an average incidence, magnitude and time to occurrence of radio-induced neurocognitive decline. We reviewed all English language published articles on neurocognitive effects of WBRT for newly diagnosed brain metastases or with a preventive goal in adult patients, with any methodology (MMSE, battery of neurcognitive tests) with which baseline status was provided. We concluded that neurocognitive decline is predominant at 4 months, strongly dependant on brain metastases control, partially solved at later time, graded 1 on a SOMA-LENT scale (only 8% of grade 2 and more), insufficiently assessed in long-term survivors, thus justifying all efforts to reduce it through irradiation modulation.

[Progress of treatments in non-small cell lung cancer with brain metastases]

Brain metastases is one of the most common complications of non-small cell lung cancer, whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT), stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), surgery and chemotherapy are standard methods in the treatment of brain metastases. But the effect of those treatments are still sad. Comprehensive treatment can prolong the survival and improve the quality of life. Recently, the improvement of technology, targeted therapy, survival time and the quality of life are in increasingly concerned. The paper make a summary of current situation and progress for comprehensive therapy of brain metastases.

Treatment of brain metastases: review of phase III randomized controlled trials

The optimal management of brain metastases remains controversial. Both whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) and local treatment [surgery (S) or radiosurgery (RS)] are the cornerstones of treatment. The role of systemic therapy is also being explored. Randomized controlled trials (RCT) have tried to assess the individual and combined effects of different therapeutic strategies. (1) RCT in oligometastatic patients: WBRT alone vs. local treatment+WBRT. Combined treatment may improve both overall survival and local control in patients with a single metastasis, but it also leads to a local control benefit in patients with two to four lesions. Exclusive local treatment vs. WBRT plus local treatment. The addition of WBRT to local treatment may result in improved local control, improved freedom from new brain metastases and improved overall brain control. S+WBRT vs. RS+WBRT. There is no evidence of superiority of a combined treatment over the other one. (2) RCT addressing the point of improving WBRT outcome: differences in WBRT fractionation do not significantly alter outcome of treatments. Only a few systemic drugs may cause some significant advantages. (3) RCT that assessed neurocognitive impairment and quality of life: the baseline cognitive performance of most patients is significantly impaired. Intracranial tumor control is an essential factor in stabilizing neurocognitive function. The data on neurocognitive toxicity related to WBRT are still contradictory. Impairment of both neurocognitive function and quality of life of patients with brain metastases needs to be further addressed in RCT.

Whole brain radiotherapy after local treatment of brain metastases in melanoma patients--a randomised phase III trial

Background

Cerebral metastases are a common cause of death in patients with melanoma. Systemic drug treatment of these metastases is rarely effective, and where possible surgical resection and/or stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) are the preferred treatment options. Treatment with adjuvant whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) following neurosurgery and/or SRS is controversial. Proponents of WBRT report prolongation of intracranial control with reduced neurological events and better palliation. Opponents state melanoma is radioresistant; that WBRT yields no survival benefit and may impair neurocognitive function. These opinions are based largely on studies in other tumour types in which assessment of neurocognitive function has been incomplete.

Methods/Design

This trial is an international, prospective multi-centre, open-label, phase III randomised controlled trial comparing WBRT to observation following local treatment of intracranial melanoma metastases with surgery and/or SRS. Patients aged 18 years or older with 1-3 brain metastases excised and/or stereotactically irradiated and an ECOG status of 0-2 are eligible. Patients with leptomeningeal disease, or who have had previous WBRT or localised treatment for brain metastases are ineligible. WBRT prescription is at least 30 Gy in 10 fractions commenced within 8 weeks of surgery and/or SRS. Randomisation is stratified by the number of cerebral metastases, presence or absence of extracranial disease, treatment centre, sex, radiotherapy dose and patient age. The primary endpoint is the proportion of patients with distant intracranial failure as determined by MRI assessment at 12 months. Secondary end points include: survival, quality of life, performance status and neurocognitive function.

Discussion

Accrual to previous trials for patients with brain metastases has been difficult, mainly due to referral bias for or against WBRT. This trial should provide the evidence that is currently lacking in treatment decision-making for patients with melanoma brain metastases. The trial is conducted by the Australia and New Zealand Melanoma Trials Group (ANZMTG-study 01-07), and the Trans Tasman Radiation Oncology Group (TROG) but international participation is encouraged. Twelve sites are open to date with 43 patients randomised as of the 31st March 2011. The target accrual is 200 patients.

Trial registration

Australia and New Zealand Clinical Trials Register (ANZCTR): ACTRN12607000512426