1
|
Markar SR, Sgromo B, Evans R, Griffiths EA, Alfieri R, Castoro C, Gronnier C, Gutschow CA, Piessen G, Capovilla G, Grimminger PP, Low DE, Gossage J, Gisbertz SS, Ruurda J, van Hillegersberg R, D'journo XB, Phillips AW, Rosati R, Hanna GB, Maynard N, Hofstetter W, Ferri L, Berge Henegouwen MI, Owen R. The Prognostic Impact of Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy on Survival After Esophagectomy Following a Delayed Interval After Chemoradiotherapy: A Secondary Analysis of the DICE Study. Ann Surg 2024; 280:650-658. [PMID: 38904105 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000006411] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/22/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate prognostic differences between minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) and open esophagectomy (OE) in patients with surgery after a prolonged interval (>12 wk) following chemoradiotherapy (CRT). BACKGROUND Previously, we established that a prolonged interval after CRT before esophagectomy was associated with poorer long-term survival. METHODS This was an international multicenter cohort study involving 17 tertiary centers, including patients who received CRT followed by surgery between 2010 and 2020. Patients undergoing MIE were defined as thoracoscopic and laparoscopic approaches. RESULTS A total of 428 patients (145 MIE and 283 OE) had surgery between 12 weeks and 2 years after CRT. Significant differences were observed in American Society of Anesthesiologists grade, radiation dose, clinical T stage, and histologic subtype. There were no significant differences between the groups in age, sex, body mass index, pathologic T or N stage, resection margin status, tumor location, surgical technique, or 90-day mortality. Survival analysis showed MIE was associated with improved survival in univariate ( P =0.014), multivariate analysis after adjustment for smoking, T and N stage, and histology (HR=1.69; 95% CI: 1.14-2.5) and propensity-matched analysis ( P =0.02). Further subgroup analyses by radiation dose and interval after CRT showed survival advantage for MIE in 40 to 50 Gy dose groups (HR=1.9; 95% CI: 1.2-3.0) and in patients having surgery within 6 months of CRT (HR=1.6; 95% CI: 1.1-2.2). CONCLUSIONS MIE was associated with improved overall survival compared with OE in patients with a prolonged interval from CRT to surgery. The mechanism for this observed improvement in survival remains unknown, with potential hypotheses including a reduction in complications and improved functional recovery after MIE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sheraz R Markar
- Department of Surgery, Churchill Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, Oxford, UK
- Nuffield Department of Surgery, University of Oxford, UK
| | - Bruno Sgromo
- Department of Surgery, Churchill Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Richard Evans
- Department of Surgery, Birmingham University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - Ewen A Griffiths
- Department of Surgery, Birmingham University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - Rita Alfieri
- General Gastric and Esophagus Surgery Unit, Humanitas Research Hospital, Italy
- Oncological Surgery Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology, IOV - IRCCS, Padua, Italy
| | - Carlo Castoro
- General Gastric and Esophagus Surgery Unit, Humanitas Research Hospital, Italy
| | - Caroline Gronnier
- Esophageal and Endocrine Surgery Unit, Digestive Surgery Department, Centre Magellan, CHU de Bordeaux, France
| | - Christian A Gutschow
- Department of Visceral Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Guillaume Piessen
- Department of Digestive and General Surgery, University Hospital Claude Huriez, Lille, Cedex, France
| | - Giovanni Capovilla
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz. Mainz, Germany
| | - Peter P Grimminger
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz. Mainz, Germany
| | - Donald E Low
- Department of Thoracic Surgery and Thoracic Oncology, Virginia Mason Hospital & Seattle Medical Center, Seattle, WA
| | - James Gossage
- Department of Surgery, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Westminster Bridge Road, London, UK
| | - Suzanne S Gisbertz
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Cancer Center Amsterdam, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jelle Ruurda
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Xavier Benoit D'journo
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Diseases of the Esophagus & Lung Transplantations. Chemin des Bourrely, North Hospital, Marseille, France
| | - Alexander W Phillips
- Northern Esophago-Gastric Unit, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Ricardo Rosati
- Department of GI Surgery, San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - George B Hanna
- Academic Surgical Unit, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, St Mary's Hospital, London, UK
| | - Nick Maynard
- Department of Surgery, Churchill Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, Oxford, UK
| | | | - Lorenzo Ferri
- Departments of Surgery and Oncology, McGill University, Montreal General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Mark I Berge Henegouwen
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Cancer Center Amsterdam, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Richard Owen
- Department of Surgery, Churchill Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, Oxford, UK
- The Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus Research Building Roosevelt Drive, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
de Jongh C, Cianchi F, Kinoshita T, Kingma F, Piccoli M, Dubecz A, Kouwenhoven E, van Det M, Mala T, Coratti A, Ubiali P, Turner P, Kish P, Borghi F, Immanuel A, Nilsson M, Rouvelas I, Hӧlzen JP, Rouanet P, Saint-Marc O, Dussart D, Patriti A, Bazzocchi F, van Etten B, Haveman JW, DePrizio M, Sabino F, Viola M, Berlth F, Grimminger PP, Roviello F, van Hillegersberg R, Ruurda J. Surgical Techniques and Related Perioperative Outcomes After Robot-assisted Minimally Invasive Gastrectomy (RAMIG): Results From the Prospective Multicenter International Ugira Gastric Registry. Ann Surg 2024; 280:98-107. [PMID: 37922237 PMCID: PMC11161237 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000006147] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To gain insight into the global practice of robot-assisted minimally invasive gastrectomy (RAMIG) and evaluate perioperative outcomes using an international registry. BACKGROUND The techniques and perioperative outcomes of RAMIG for gastric cancer vary substantially in the literature. METHODS Prospectively registered RAMIG cases for gastric cancer (≥10 per center) were extracted from 25 centers in Europe, Asia, and South-America. Techniques for resection, reconstruction, anastomosis, and lymphadenectomy were analyzed and related to perioperative surgical and oncological outcomes. Complications were uniformly defined by the Gastrectomy Complications Consensus Group. RESULTS Between 2020 and 2023, 759 patients underwent total (n=272), distal (n=465), or proximal (n=22) gastrectomy (RAMIG). After total gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y-reconstruction, anastomotic leakage rates were 8% with hand-sewn (n=9/111) and 6% with linear stapled anastomoses (n=6/100). After distal gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y (67%) or Billroth-II-reconstruction (31%), anastomotic leakage rates were 3% with linear stapled (n=11/433) and 0% with hand-sewn anastomoses (n=0/26). Extent of lymphadenectomy consisted of D1+ (28%), D2 (59%), or D2+ (12%). Median nodal harvest yielded 31 nodes (interquartile range: 21-47) after total and 34 nodes (interquartile range: 24-47) after distal gastrectomy. R0 resection rates were 93% after total and 96% distal gastrectomy. The hospital stay was 9 days after total and distal gastrectomy, and was median 3 days shorter without perianastomotic drains versus routine drain placement. Postoperative 30-day mortality was 1%. CONCLUSIONS This large multicenter study provided a worldwide overview of current RAMIG techniques and their respective perioperative outcomes. These outcomes demonstrated high surgical quality, set a quality standard for RAMIG, and can be considered an international reference for surgical standardization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cas de Jongh
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center (UMC) Utrecht, University of Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Fabio Cianchi
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University Hospital Careggi, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Takahiro Kinoshita
- Department of Gastric Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan
| | - Feike Kingma
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center (UMC) Utrecht, University of Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Micaela Piccoli
- Department of Surgery, Civile Baggiovara Hospital, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria (AOU) of Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - Attila Dubecz
- Department of Surgery, Klinikum Nürnberg, Paracelsus Medical University, Nürnberg, Germany
| | | | - Marc van Det
- Department of Surgery, Hospital ZGT Almelo, Almelo, The Netherlands
| | - Tom Mala
- Department of Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, University of Oslo, Norway
| | - Andrea Coratti
- Department of Surgery, Misericordia Hospital Grosseto, Grosseto, Italy
| | - Paolo Ubiali
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Santa Maria degli Angeli, Pordenone, Italy
| | - Paul Turner
- Department of Surgery, Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Preston, UK
| | - Pursnani Kish
- Department of Surgery, Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Preston, UK
| | - Felice Borghi
- Department of Surgery, General Hospital Cuneo, Cuneo, Italy
- Department of Surgery, Candiolo Cancer Institute, Turin, Italy
| | - Arul Immanuel
- Department of Surgery, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle, UK
| | - Magnus Nilsson
- Department of Upper Abdominal Diseases, Division of Surgery and Oncology, CLINTEC, Karolinska Institutet and Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Ioannis Rouvelas
- Department of Upper Abdominal Diseases, Division of Surgery and Oncology, CLINTEC, Karolinska Institutet and Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | - Philippe Rouanet
- Department of Surgery, Montpellier Cancer Institute, Montpellier, France
| | - Olivier Saint-Marc
- Department of Surgery, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire Orléans, Orléans, France
| | - David Dussart
- Department of Surgery, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire Orléans, Orléans, France
| | - Alberto Patriti
- Department of Surgery, General Hospital Marche Nord, Pesaro, Italy
| | - Francesca Bazzocchi
- Department of Surgery, San Giovanni Rotondo Hospital IRCCS, San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy
| | - Boudewijn van Etten
- Department of Surgery, UMC Groningen, University of Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Jan W. Haveman
- Department of Surgery, UMC Groningen, University of Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Marco DePrizio
- Department of Surgery, General Hospital Arezzo, Arezzo, Italy
| | - Flávio Sabino
- Department of Surgery, National Cancer Institute Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil
| | - Massimo Viola
- Department of Surgery, General Hospital Tricase, Tricase, Italy
| | - Felix Berlth
- Department of Surgery, UMC Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | | | - Franco Roviello
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Siena, Siena, Italy
| | - Richard van Hillegersberg
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center (UMC) Utrecht, University of Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Jelle Ruurda
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center (UMC) Utrecht, University of Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Harris A, Butterworth JB, Boshier PR, Mavroveli S, Vadhwana B, Peters CJ, Eom BW, Yeh CC, Mikhail S, Sasako M, Kim YW, Hanna GB. Development of a reliable surgical quality assurance tool for gastrectomy in oncological trials. Gastric Cancer 2024; 27:876-883. [PMID: 38761290 PMCID: PMC11193692 DOI: 10.1007/s10120-024-01503-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2023] [Accepted: 04/09/2024] [Indexed: 05/20/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite its recognized importance, there is currently no reliable tool for surgical quality assurance (SQA) of gastrectomy in surgical oncology. The aim of this study was to develop an SQA tool for gastrectomy and to apply this tool within the ADDICT Trial in order to assess the extent and completeness of lymphadenectomy. METHODS The operative steps for D1+ and D2 gastrectomy have been previously described in the literature and ADDICT trial manual. Two researchers also performed fieldwork in the UK and Japan to document key operative steps through photographs and semi-structured interviews with expert surgeons. This provided the steps that were used as the framework for the SQA tool. Sixty-two photographic cases from the ADDICT Trial were rated by three independent surgeons. Generalizability (G) theory determined inter-rater reliability. D-studies examined the effect of varying the number of assessors and photographic series they rated. Chi-square assessed intra-rater reliability, comparing how the individual assessor's responses corresponded to their global rating for extent of lymphadenectomy. RESULTS The tool comprised 20 items, including 19 anatomical landmarks and a global rating score. Overall reliability had G-coefficient of 0.557. Internal consistency was measured with a Cronbach's alpha score of 0.869 and Chi-square confirmed intra-rater reliability for each assessor as < 0.05. CONCLUSIONS A photographic surgical quality assurance tool is presented for gastrectomy. Using this tool, the assessor can reliably determine not only the quality but also the extent of the lymphadenectomy performed based on remaining anatomy rather than the excised specimen.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Harris
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, 7th Floor Commonwealth Building, Hammersmith Hospital, Du Cane Road, London, W12 0HS, UK
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Barking Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - J B Butterworth
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, 7th Floor Commonwealth Building, Hammersmith Hospital, Du Cane Road, London, W12 0HS, UK
| | - P R Boshier
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, 7th Floor Commonwealth Building, Hammersmith Hospital, Du Cane Road, London, W12 0HS, UK
| | - S Mavroveli
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, 7th Floor Commonwealth Building, Hammersmith Hospital, Du Cane Road, London, W12 0HS, UK
| | - B Vadhwana
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, 7th Floor Commonwealth Building, Hammersmith Hospital, Du Cane Road, London, W12 0HS, UK
| | - C J Peters
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, 7th Floor Commonwealth Building, Hammersmith Hospital, Du Cane Road, London, W12 0HS, UK
| | - B W Eom
- Center for Gastric Cancer, National Cancer Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - C-C Yeh
- Department of Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - S Mikhail
- Department of General Surgery, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - M Sasako
- Department of Surgery, Yodogawa Christian Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Y-W Kim
- Center for Gastric Cancer, National Cancer Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - G B Hanna
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, 7th Floor Commonwealth Building, Hammersmith Hospital, Du Cane Road, London, W12 0HS, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ketel MHM, Klarenbeek BR, Eddahchouri Y, Cheong E, Cuesta MA, van Daele E, Ferri LE, Gisbertz SS, Gutschow CA, Hubka M, Hölscher AH, Law S, Luyer MDP, Merritt RE, Morse CR, Mueller CL, Nieuwenhuijzen GAP, Nilsson M, Pattyn P, Shen Y, van den Wildenberg FJH, Abma IL, Rosman C, van Workum F. A Video-Based Procedure-Specific Competency Assessment Tool for Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy. JAMA Surg 2024; 159:297-305. [PMID: 38150247 PMCID: PMC10753443 DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2023.6522] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2023] [Accepted: 09/11/2023] [Indexed: 12/28/2023]
Abstract
Importance Minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) is a complex procedure with substantial learning curves. In other complex minimally invasive procedures, suboptimal surgical performance has convincingly been associated with less favorable patient outcomes as assessed by peer review of the surgical procedure. Objective To develop and validate a procedure-specific competency assessment tool (CAT) for MIE. Design, Setting, and Participants In this international quality improvement study, a procedure-specific MIE-CAT was developed and validated. The MIE-CAT contains 8 procedural phases, and 4 quality components per phase are scored with a Likert scale ranging from 1 to 4. For evaluation of the MIE-CAT, intraoperative MIE videos performed by a single surgical team in the Esophageal Center East Netherlands were peer reviewed by 18 independent international MIE experts (with more than 120 MIEs performed). Each video was assessed by 2 or 3 blinded experts to evaluate feasibility, content validity, reliability, and construct validity. MIE-CAT version 2 was composed with refined content aimed at improving interrater reliability. A total of 32 full-length MIE videos from patients who underwent MIE between 2011 and 2020 were analyzed. Data were analyzed from January 2021 to January 2023. Exposure Performance assessment of transthoracic MIE with an intrathoracic anastomosis. Main Outcomes and Measures Feasibility, content validity, interrater and intrarater reliability, and construct validity, including correlations with both experience of the surgical team and clinical parameters, of the developed MIE-CAT. Results Experts found the MIE-CAT easy to understand and easy to use to grade surgical performance. The MIE-CAT demonstrated good intrarater reliability (range of intraclass correlation coefficients [ICCs], 0.807 [95% CI, 0.656 to 0.892] for quality component score to 0.898 [95% CI, 0.846 to 0.932] for phase score). Interrater reliability was moderate (range of ICCs, 0.536 [95% CI, -0.220 to 0.994] for total MIE-CAT score to 0.705 [95% CI, 0.473 to 0.846] for quality component score), and most discrepancies originated in the lymphadenectomy phases. Hypothesis testing for construct validity showed more than 75% of hypotheses correct: MIE-CAT performance scores correlated with experience of the surgical team (r = 0.288 to 0.622), blood loss (r = -0.034 to -0.545), operative time (r = -0.309 to -0.611), intraoperative complications (r = -0.052 to -0.319), and severe postoperative complications (r = -0.207 to -0.395). MIE-CAT version 2 increased usability. Interrater reliability improved but remained moderate (range of ICCs, 0.666 to 0.743), and most discrepancies between raters remained in the lymphadenectomy phases. Conclusions and Relevance The MIE-CAT was developed and its feasibility, content validity, reliability, and construct validity were demonstrated. By providing insight into surgical performance of MIE, the MIE-CAT might be used for clinical, training, and research purposes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mirte H. M. Ketel
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | | | - Yassin Eddahchouri
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Edward Cheong
- The PanAsia Surgery Group, Mount Elizabeth Hospital, Singapore
| | - Miguel A. Cuesta
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location VUmc, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Elke van Daele
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Lorenzo E. Ferri
- Department of Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Suzanne S. Gisbertz
- Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Surgery, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Christian A. Gutschow
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Michal Hubka
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - Arnulf H. Hölscher
- Department for General, Visceral and Trauma Surgery, Elisabeth-Krankenhaus-Essen GmbH, Essen, Germany
| | - Simon Law
- Department of Surgery, Queen Mary Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Misha D. P. Luyer
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - Robert E. Merritt
- Department of Surgery, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus
| | | | - Carmen L. Mueller
- Department of Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | | | - Magnus Nilsson
- Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Upper Abdominal Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Piet Pattyn
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Yaxing Shen
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | | | - Inger L. Abma
- IQ Healthcare, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Camiel Rosman
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Frans van Workum
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Canisius-Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Markar SR, Visser MR, van der Veen A, Luyer MD, Nieuwenhuijzen G, Stoot JH, Tegels JJ, Wijnhoven BP, Lagarde SM, de Steur WO, Hartgrink HH, Kouwenhoven EA, Wassenaar EB, Draaisma WA, Gisbertz SS, van Berge Henehouwen MI, van der Peet DL, Ruurda JP, van Hillegersberg R. Evolution in Laparoscopic Gastrectomy From a Randomized Controlled Trial Through National Clinical Practice. Ann Surg 2024; 279:394-401. [PMID: 37991188 PMCID: PMC10829898 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000006162] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To examine the influence of the LOGICA RCT (randomized controlled trial) upon the practice and outcomes of laparoscopic gastrectomy within the Netherlands. BACKGROUND Following RCTs the dissemination of complex interventions has been poorly studied. The LOGICA RCT included 10 Dutch centers and compared laparoscopic to open gastrectomy. METHODS Data were obtained from the Dutch Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Audit (DUCA) on all gastrectomies performed in the Netherlands (2012-2021), and the LOGICA RCT from 2015 to 2018. Multilevel multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to assess the effect of laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy upon clinical outcomes before, during, and after the LOGICA RCT. RESULTS Two hundred eleven patients from the LOGICA RCT (105 open vs 106 laparoscopic) and 4131 patients from the DUCA data set (1884 open vs 2247 laparoscopic) were included. In 2012, laparoscopic gastrectomy was performed in 6% of patients, increasing to 82% in 2021. No significant effect of laparoscopic gastrectomy on postoperative clinical outcomes was observed within the LOGICA RCT. Nationally within DUCA, a shift toward a beneficial effect of laparoscopic gastrectomy upon complications was observed, reaching a significant reduction in overall [adjusted odds ratio (aOR):0.62; 95% CI: 0.46-0.82], severe (aOR: 0.64; 95% CI: 0.46-0.90) and cardiac complications (aOR: 0.51; 95% CI: 0.30-0.89) after the LOGICA trial. CONCLUSIONS The wider benefits of the LOGICA trial included the safe dissemination of laparoscopic gastrectomy across the Netherlands. The robust surgical quality assurance program in the design of the LOGICA RCT was crucial to facilitate the national dissemination of the technique following the trial and reducing potential patient harm during surgeons learning curve.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sheraz R. Markar
- Nuffield Department of Surgery, University of Oxford, UK
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Maurits R. Visser
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Scientific Bureau, Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Arjen van der Veen
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Misha D.P. Luyer
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | | | - Jan H.M.B. Stoot
- Department of Surgery, Zuyderland Medical Center, Heerlen and Sittard-Geleen, The Netherlands
| | - Juul J.W. Tegels
- Department of Surgery, Zuyderland Medical Center, Heerlen and Sittard-Geleen, The Netherlands
| | - Bas P.L. Wijnhoven
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sjoerd M. Lagarde
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Wobbe O. de Steur
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Henk H. Hartgrink
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Werner A. Draaisma
- Department of Surgery, Meander Medical Center, Amersfoort, The Netherlands
| | - Suzanne S. Gisbertz
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mark I. van Berge Henehouwen
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Donald L. van der Peet
- Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jelle P. Ruurda
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Grüter AAJ, Toorenvliet BR, Belgers EHJ, Belt EJT, van Duijvendijk P, Hoff C, Hompes R, Smits AB, van de Ven AWH, van Westreenen HL, Bonjer HJ, Tanis PJ, Tuynman JB. Nationwide standardization of minimally invasive right hemicolectomy for colon cancer and development and validation of a video-based competency assessment tool (the Right study). Br J Surg 2024; 111:znad404. [PMID: 38103184 PMCID: PMC10763527 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znad404] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2023] [Accepted: 11/16/2023] [Indexed: 12/17/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Substantial variation exists when performing a minimally invasive right hemicolectomy (MIRH) due to disparities in training, expertise and differences in implementation of innovations. This study aimed to achieve national consensus on an optimal and standardized MIRH technique for colon cancer and to develop and validate a video-based competency assessment tool (CAT) for MIRH. METHOD Statements covering all elements of MIRH were formulated. Subsequently, the Delphi technique was used to reach consensus on a standardized MIRH among 76 colorectal surgeons from 43 different centres. A CAT was developed based on the Delphi results. Nine surgeons assessed the same 12 unedited full-length videos using the CAT, allowing evaluation of the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). RESULTS After three Delphi rounds, consensus (≥80% agreement) was achieved on 23 of the 24 statements. Consensus statements included the use of low intra-abdominal pressure, detailed anatomical outline how to perform complete mesocolic excision with central vascular ligation, the creation of an intracorporeal anastomosis, and specimen extraction through a Pfannenstiel incision using a wound protector. The CAT included seven consecutive steps to measure competency of the MIRH and showed high consistency among surgeons with an overall ICC of 0.923. CONCLUSION Nationwide consensus on a standardized and optimized technique of MIRH was reached. The CAT developed showed excellent interrater reliability. These achievements are crucial steps to an ongoing nationwide quality improvement project (the Right study).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander A J Grüter
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Treatment and Quality of Life, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Eric H J Belgers
- Department of Surgery, Zuyderland Medisch Centrum, Heerlen, The Netherlands
| | - Eric J T Belt
- Department of Surgery, Albert Schweitzer Ziekenhuis, Dordrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Christiaan Hoff
- Department of Surgery, Medisch Centrum Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, The Netherlands
| | - Roel Hompes
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Anke B Smits
- Department of Surgery, St.Antonius Ziekenhuis, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Hendrik J Bonjer
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Pieter J Tanis
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jurriaan B Tuynman
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Wirsik NM, Schmidt T, Nienhüser H, Donlon NE, de Jongh C, Uzun E, Fuchs HF, Brunner S, Alakus H, Hölscher AH, Grimminger P, Schneider M, Reynolds JV, van Hillegersberg R, Bruns CJ. Impact of the Surgical Approach for Neoadjuvantly Treated Gastroesophageal Junction Type II Tumors: A Multinational, High-volume Center Retrospective Cohort Analysis. Ann Surg 2023; 278:683-691. [PMID: 37522845 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000006011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/01/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to explore oncologic outcomes of transhiatal gastrectomy (THG) or transthoracic esophagectomy (TTE) for neoadjuvantly treated gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) Siewert type II adenocarcinomas, a multinational, high-volume center cohort analysis was undertaken. BACKGROUND Neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy or perioperative chemotherapy (CTx) followed by surgery is the standard therapy for locally advanced GEJ. However, the optimal surgical approach for type II GEJ tumors remains unclear, as the decision is mainly based on individual experience and assessment of operative risk. METHODS A retrospective analysis of 5 prospectively maintained databases was conducted. Between 2012 and 2021, 800 patients fulfilled inclusion criteria for type II GEJ tumors and neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy or CTx. The primary endpoint was median overall survival (mOS). Propensity score matching was performed to minimize selection bias. RESULTS Patients undergoing THG (n=163, 20.4%) had higher American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification and cT stage ( P <0.001) than patients undergoing TTE (n=637, 79.6%). Neoadjuvant therapy was different as the THG group were mainly undergoing CTx (87.1%, P <0.001). The TTE group showed higher tumor regression ( P =0.009), lower ypT/ypM categories (both P <0.001), higher nodal yield ( P =0.009) and higher R0 resection rate ( P =0.001). The mOS after TTE was longer (78.0 vs 40.0 months, P =0.013). After propensity score matching a higher R0 resection rate ( P =0.004) and mOS benefit after TTE remained ( P =0.04). Subgroup analyses of patients without distant metastasis ( P =0.037) and patients only after neoadjuvant chemotherapy ( P =0.021) confirmed the survival benefit of TTE. TTE was an independent predictor of longer survival. CONCLUSION Awaiting results of the randomized CARDIA trial, TTE should in high-volume centers be considered the preferred approach due to favorable oncologic outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naita M Wirsik
- Department of General, Visceral, Cancer, and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Thomas Schmidt
- Department of General, Visceral, Cancer, and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Henrik Nienhüser
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Noel E Donlon
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
- Trinity St James' Cancer Institute, St James's Hospital Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Cas de Jongh
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Eren Uzun
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplant Surgery, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany
| | - Hans F Fuchs
- Department of General, Visceral, Cancer, and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Stefanie Brunner
- Department of General, Visceral, Cancer, and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Hakan Alakus
- Department of General, Visceral, Cancer, and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Arnulf H Hölscher
- Contilia Center for Esophageal Diseases, Elisabeth Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Peter Grimminger
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplant Surgery, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany
| | - Martin Schneider
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - John V Reynolds
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
- Trinity St James' Cancer Institute, St James's Hospital Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Richard van Hillegersberg
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Christiane J Bruns
- Department of General, Visceral, Cancer, and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Grüter AAJ, Coblijn UK, Toorenvliet BR, Tanis PJ, Tuynman JB. National implementation of an optimal standardised technique for right-sided colon cancer: protocol of an interventional sequential cohort study (Right study). Tech Coloproctol 2023; 27:1083-1090. [PMID: 37097330 PMCID: PMC10562307 DOI: 10.1007/s10151-023-02801-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2023] [Accepted: 04/03/2023] [Indexed: 04/26/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Minimally invasive right hemicolectomy (MIRH) is the cornerstone of treatment for patients with right-sided colon cancer. This operation has evolved during recent decades, with many innovations and improvements but this has also resulted in high variability of uptake with subsequent substantial variableness. The aim of this ongoing study is to identify current surgical variations, determine the most optimal and standardised MIRH and nationally train and implement that technique to improve short-term clinical and long-term oncological outcomes. METHODS The Right study is a national multicentre prospective interventional sequential cohort study. Firstly, current local practice was evaluated. Subsequently, a standardised surgical technique for right-sided colon cancer was determined using the Delphi consensus method, and this procedure was trained during hands-on courses. The standardised MIRH will be implemented with proctoring (implementation cohort), after which the performance will be monitored (consolidation cohort). Patients who will receive a minimally invasive (extended) right hemicolectomy for cT1-3N0-2M0 colon cancer will be included. The primary outcome is patient safety reflected in the 90-day overall complication rate according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. Secondary outcomes will include intraoperative complications, 90-day mortality rate, number of resected tumour-positive lymph nodes, completeness of mesocolic excision, surgical quality score, locoregional and distant recurrence and 5-year overall survival. A total number of 1095 patients (365 per cohort) will be included. DISCUSSION The Right study is designed to safely implement the best surgical practice concerning patients with right-sided colon cancer aiming to standardise and improve the surgical quality of MIRH at a national level. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04889456, May 2021.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander A J Grüter
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Usha K Coblijn
- Department of Surgery, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Plesmanlaan 121, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Pieter J Tanis
- Department of Surgery, UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jurriaan B Tuynman
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
de Jongh C, Triemstra L, van der Veen A, Brosens LA, Nieuwenhuijzen GA, Stoot JH, de Steur WO, Ruurda JP, van Hillegersberg R. Surgical quality and prospective quality control of the D2-gastrectomy for gastric cancer in the multicenter randomized LOGICA-trial. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY 2023; 49:107018. [PMID: 37651889 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2023.107018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2023] [Revised: 07/11/2023] [Accepted: 08/10/2023] [Indexed: 09/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Quality of gastric cancer surgery is crucial for favorable prognosis. Generally, prospective trials lack quality control measures. This study assessed surgical quality and a novel D2-lymphadenectomy photo-scoring in the LOGICA-trial. METHODS The multicenter LOGICA-trial randomized laparoscopic versus open total/distal D2-gastrectomy for resectable gastric cancer (cT1-4aN0-3M0) in 10 Dutch hospitals. During the trial, two reviewers prospectively analyzed intraoperative photographs of dissected nodal stations for quality control, and provided centers weekly feedback on their D2-lymphadenectomy, as continuous quality-enhancing incentive. After the trial, these photographs were reanalyzed to develop a photo-scoring for future trials, rating the D2-lymphadenectomy dissection quality (optimal-good-suboptimal-unevaluable). Interobserver variability was calculated (weighted kappa). Regression analyses related the photo-scoring to nodal yield, recurrence and 5-years survival. RESULTS Between 2015 and 2018, 212 patients underwent total/distal D2-gastrectomy (n = 122/n = 90), and 158 (75%) received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. R0-resection rate was 95%. Rate of ≥15 retrieved lymph nodes was 95%. Moderate agreement was obtained in stations 8 + 9 (κ = 0.522), 11p/11d (κ = 0.446) and 12a (κ = 0.441). Consensus was reached for discordant cases (30%). Stations 8 + 9, 11p/11d and 12a were rated 'optimal' in 76%, 63% and 68%. Laparoscopic photographs could be rated better than open (2% versus 12% 'unevaluable'; 73% versus 50% 'optimal'; p = 0.042). The photo-scoring did not show associations with nodal yield (p = 0.214), recurrence (p = 0.406) and survival (p = 0.988). CONCLUSIONS High radicality and nodal yield demonstrated good quality of D2-gastrectomy. The prospective quality control probably contributed to this. The photo-scoring did not show good performance, but can be refined. Laparoscopic D2-gastrectomy was better suited for standardized surgical photo-evaluation than open surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cas de Jongh
- University Medical Center (UMC) Utrecht, Department of Surgery, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Lianne Triemstra
- University Medical Center (UMC) Utrecht, Department of Surgery, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Arjen van der Veen
- University Medical Center (UMC) Utrecht, Department of Surgery, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | | | | | - Jan Hmb Stoot
- Zuyderland Medical Center, Department of Surgery, Sittard, the Netherlands
| | | | - Jelle P Ruurda
- University Medical Center (UMC) Utrecht, Department of Surgery, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Lu J, Huang JB, Wu D, Xie JW, Wang JB, Lin JX, Zheng CH, Huang CM, Li P. Factors affecting the quality of laparoscopic D2 lymph node dissection for gastric cancer: a cohort study from two randomized controlled trials. Int J Surg 2023; 109:1249-1256. [PMID: 37026819 PMCID: PMC10389415 DOI: 10.1097/js9.0000000000000290] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2022] [Accepted: 02/08/2023] [Indexed: 04/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Laparoscopic D2 lymph node dissection (LND) for gastric cancer has a wide range and high difficulty. In the past, the quality of surgery was often judged by the time of the operation or the amount of blood loss, but the analysis based on surgical video was rarely reported. The purpose of this study was to analyze the relationship between the quality of laparoscopic D2 LND for gastric cancer and postoperative complications. METHODS The surgical video and clinicopathological data of 610 patients in two randomized controlled trials in our center from 2013 to 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. Klass-02-QC LND scale and general error score tool were used to quantitatively evaluate the intraoperative performance of D2 LND. Logistic regression was used to analyze the influencing factors of postoperative complications. RESULTS The overall incidence of complications (CD classification≥2) was 20.6%; the incidence of surgical complications was 6.9%. According to whether the LND score reached 44, patients were divided into a qualified group (73%) and a not-qualified group (27%). Event score (ES) by quartile was divided into grade 1 (21.7%), grade 2 (26%), grade 3 (28%), and grade 4 (24.3%) from low to high. Univariate logistic regression analysis showed that ES greater than or equal to 3, tumor size greater than or equal to 35 mm, and cTNM >II were independent risk factors for not-qualified LND. Male,tumor size greater than or equal to 35 mm and cTNM >II were independent risk factors for grade 4 ES. Not-qualified LND (OR=1.62, 95% CI: 1.16-3.89, P =0.021), grade 4 ES (OR=3.21, 95% CI: 1.52-3.90, P =0.035), and cTNM >II (OR=1.74, 95% CI: 1.39-7.33, P =0.041) were independent risk factors for postoperative surgical complications. CONCLUSIONS The qualification of LND and intraoperative events based on surgical video are the independent influencing factors of postoperative complications of laparoscopic gastric cancer surgery. Specialist training and teaching based on surgical video may help to improve the surgical skills of specialists and improve the postoperative outcome of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jun Lu
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital
- Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education of Gastrointestinal Cancer
- Fujian Key Laboratory of Tumor Microbiology, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Jiao-Bao Huang
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital
- Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education of Gastrointestinal Cancer
- Fujian Key Laboratory of Tumor Microbiology, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Dong Wu
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital
- Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education of Gastrointestinal Cancer
- Fujian Key Laboratory of Tumor Microbiology, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Jian-Wei Xie
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital
- Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education of Gastrointestinal Cancer
- Fujian Key Laboratory of Tumor Microbiology, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Jia-Bin Wang
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital
- Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education of Gastrointestinal Cancer
- Fujian Key Laboratory of Tumor Microbiology, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Jian-Xian Lin
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital
- Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education of Gastrointestinal Cancer
- Fujian Key Laboratory of Tumor Microbiology, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Chao-Hui Zheng
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital
- Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education of Gastrointestinal Cancer
- Fujian Key Laboratory of Tumor Microbiology, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Chang-Ming Huang
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital
- Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education of Gastrointestinal Cancer
- Fujian Key Laboratory of Tumor Microbiology, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Ping Li
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital
- Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education of Gastrointestinal Cancer
- Fujian Key Laboratory of Tumor Microbiology, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Harris A, Butterworth J, Boshier PR, MacKenzie H, Tokunaga M, Sunagawa H, Mavroveli S, Ni M, Mikhail S, Yeh CC, Blencowe NS, Avery KNL, Hardwick R, Hoelscher A, Pera M, Zaninotto G, Law S, Low DE, van Lanschot JJB, Berrisford R, Barham CP, Blazeby JM, Hanna GB. Development of a Reliable Surgical Quality Assurance System for 2-stage Esophagectomy in Randomized Controlled Trials. Ann Surg 2022; 275:121-130. [PMID: 32224728 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000003850] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim was to develop a reliable surgical quality assurance system for 2-stage esophagectomy. This development was conducted during the pilot phase of the multicenter ROMIO trial, collaborating with international experts. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA There is evidence that the quality of surgical performance in randomized controlled trials influences clinical outcomes, quality of lymphadenectomy and loco-regional recurrence. METHODS Standardization of 2-stage esophagectomy was based on structured observations, semi-structured interviews, hierarchical task analysis, and a Delphi consensus process. This standardization provided the structure for the operation manual and video and photographic assessment tools. Reliability was examined using generalizability theory. RESULTS Hierarchical task analysis for 2-stage esophagectomy comprised fifty-four steps. Consensus (75%) agreement was reached on thirty-nine steps, whereas fifteen steps had a majority decision. An operation manual and record were created. A thirty five-item video assessment tool was developed that assessed the process (safety and efficiency) and quality of the end product (anatomy exposed and lymphadenectomy performed) of the operation. The quality of the end product section was used as a twenty seven-item photographic assessment tool. Thirty-one videos and fifty-three photographic series were submitted from the ROMIO pilot phase for assessment. The overall G-coefficient for the video assessment tool was 0.744, and for the photographic assessment tool was 0.700. CONCLUSIONS A reliable surgical quality assurance system for 2-stage esophagectomy has been developed for surgical oncology randomized controlled trials. ETHICAL APPROVAL 11/NW/0895 and confirmed locally as appropriate, 12/SW/0161, 16/SW/0098.Trial registration number: ISRCTN59036820, ISRCTN10386621.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Harris
- Department of Surgery & Cancer, Imperial College London, United Kingdom
| | - James Butterworth
- Department of Surgery & Cancer, Imperial College London, United Kingdom
| | - Piers R Boshier
- Department of Surgery & Cancer, Imperial College London, United Kingdom
| | - Hugh MacKenzie
- Department of Surgery & Cancer, Imperial College London, United Kingdom
| | - Masanori Tokunaga
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Japan
| | - Hideki Sunagawa
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, New Tokyo Hospital, Japan
| | - Stella Mavroveli
- Department of Surgery & Cancer, Imperial College London, United Kingdom
| | - Melody Ni
- Department of Surgery & Cancer, Imperial College London, United Kingdom
| | - Sameh Mikhail
- Department of General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine University of Cairo, Egypt
| | - Chi-Chuan Yeh
- Department of Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taiwan
| | - Natalie S Blencowe
- Division of Surgery, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom
- National Institute for Health Research Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, University of Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Kerry N L Avery
- National Institute for Health Research Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, University of Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Richard Hardwick
- Upper gastrointestinal Unit, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom
| | - Arnulf Hoelscher
- Center for Esophageal and Gastric Surgery, Agaplesion Markus Hospital, Germany
| | - Manuel Pera
- Department of Surgery, Hospital del Mar, Spain
| | | | - Simon Law
- Department of Esophageal and Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, The University of Hong Kong Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong
| | - Donald E Low
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, WA
| | | | - Richard Berrisford
- Department of Surgery, University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust, United Kingdom
| | | | - Jane M Blazeby
- Division of Surgery, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom
- National Institute for Health Research Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, University of Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - George B Hanna
- Department of Surgery & Cancer, Imperial College London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Müller-Stich BP, Probst P, Nienhüser H, Fazeli S, Senft J, Kalkum E, Heger P, Warschkow R, Nickel F, Billeter AT, Grimminger PP, Gutschow C, Dabakuyo-Yonli TS, Piessen G, Paireder M, Schoppmann SF, van der Peet DL, Cuesta MA, van der Sluis P, van Hillegersberg R, Hölscher AH, Diener MK, Schmidt T. Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and individual patient data comparing minimally invasive with open oesophagectomy for cancer. Br J Surg 2021; 108:1026-1033. [PMID: 34491293 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znab278] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2021] [Accepted: 06/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Minimally invasive oesophagectomy (MIO) for oesophageal cancer may reduce surgical complications compared with open oesophagectomy. MIO is, however, technically challenging and may impair optimal oncological resection. The aim of the present study was to assess if MIO for cancer is beneficial. METHODS A systematic literature search in MEDLINE, Web of Science and CENTRAL was performed and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing MIO with open oesophagectomy were included in a meta-analysis. Survival was analysed using individual patient data. Random-effects model was used for pooled estimates of perioperative effects. RESULTS Among 3219 articles, six RCTs were identified including 822 patients. Three-year overall survival (56 (95 per cent c.i. 49 to 62) per cent for MIO versus 52 (95 per cent c.i. 44 to 60) per cent for open; P = 0.54) and disease-free survival (54 (95 per cent c.i. 47 to 61) per cent versus 50 (95 per cent c.i. 42 to 58) per cent; P = 0.38) were comparable. Overall complication rate was lower for MIO (odds ratio 0.33 (95 per cent c.i. 0.20 to 0.53); P < 0.010) mainly due to fewer pulmonary complications (OR 0.44 (95 per cent c.i. 0.27 to 0.72); P < 0.010), including pneumonia (OR 0.41 (95 per cent c.i. 0.22 to 0.77); P < 0.010). CONCLUSION MIO for cancer is associated with a lower risk of postoperative complications compared with open resection. Overall and disease-free survival are comparable for the two techniques. LAY SUMMARY Oesophagectomy for cancer is associated with a high risk of complications. A minimally invasive approach might be less traumatic, leading to fewer complications and may also improve oncological outcome. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing minimally invasive to open oesophagectomy was performed. The analysis showed that the minimally invasive approach led to fewer postoperative complications, in particular, fewer pulmonary complications. Survival after surgery was comparable for the two techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B P Müller-Stich
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Ruprecht Karl University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - P Probst
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Ruprecht Karl University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.,The Study Center of the German Surgical Society (SDGC), Ruprecht Karl University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - H Nienhüser
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Ruprecht Karl University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - S Fazeli
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Ruprecht Karl University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - J Senft
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Ruprecht Karl University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - E Kalkum
- The Study Center of the German Surgical Society (SDGC), Ruprecht Karl University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - P Heger
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Ruprecht Karl University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.,The Study Center of the German Surgical Society (SDGC), Ruprecht Karl University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - R Warschkow
- Department of Surgery, Kantonsspital, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| | - F Nickel
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Ruprecht Karl University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - A T Billeter
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Ruprecht Karl University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - P P Grimminger
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany
| | - C Gutschow
- Department of Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - T S Dabakuyo-Yonli
- Epidemiology and Quality of Life Unit, INSERM 1231, Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | - G Piessen
- Department of Digestive and Oncological Surgery, Claude Huriez University Hospital, Lille, France
| | - M Paireder
- Department of Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - S F Schoppmann
- Department of Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - D L van der Peet
- Gastrointestinal and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Vrije University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - M A Cuesta
- Gastrointestinal and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Vrije University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - P van der Sluis
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - R van Hillegersberg
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - A H Hölscher
- Contilia Centre for Oesophageal Diseases, Elisabeth Hospital, Essen, Germany
| | - M K Diener
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Ruprecht Karl University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - T Schmidt
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Ruprecht Karl University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Assurance of surgical quality within multicenter randomized controlled trials for bariatric and metabolic surgery: a systematic review. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2021; 18:124-132. [PMID: 34602346 DOI: 10.1016/j.soard.2021.08.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2021] [Revised: 05/30/2021] [Accepted: 08/21/2021] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Surgical quality assurance methods aim to ensure standardization and high quality of surgical techniques within multicenter randomized controlled trials (RCTs), thereby diminishing the heterogeneity of surgery and reducing biases due to surgical variation. This study aimed to establish the measures undertaken to ensure surgical quality within multicenter RCTs investigating bariatric and metabolic surgery, and their influence upon clinical outcomes. METHODS An electronic literature search was performed from the Embase, Medline, and Web of Science databases to identify multicenter RCTs investigating bariatric and metabolic surgery. Each RCT was evaluated against a checklist of surgical quality measures within 3 domain: (1) standardization of surgical techniques; (2) credentialing of surgical experience; and (3) monitoring of performance. Outcome measures were postoperative weight change and complications. RESULTS Nineteen multicenter RCTs were included in the analysis. Three studies undertook pretrial education of surgical standard. Fourteen studies described complete standardization of surgical techniques. Four studies credentialed surgeons by case volume prior to enrollment. Two studies used intraoperative or video evaluation of surgical technique prior to enrollment. Only two studies monitored performance during the study. Although there were limited quality assurance methods undertaken, utilization of these techniques was associated with reduced overall complications. Standardization of surgery was associated with reduced re-operation rates but did not influence postoperative weight loss. CONCLUSION The utilization of methods for surgical quality assurance are very limited within multicenter RCTs of bariatric and metabolic surgery. Future studies must implement surgical quality assurance methods to reduce variability of surgical performance and potential bias within RCTs.
Collapse
|
14
|
Jiang H, Hua R, Sun Y, Guo X, Liu Z, Su Y, Li B, Yang Y, Zhang H, Li Z. Risk Factors for Anastomotic Complications After Radical McKeown Esophagectomy. Ann Thorac Surg 2021; 112:944-951. [DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.09.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2020] [Revised: 08/26/2020] [Accepted: 09/18/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
|
15
|
Kamarajah SK, Elhadi M, Umar H, Subramanya MS, Evans RP, Powell SL, Griffiths EA. Age or frailty: What matters in oesophagectomy for cancer in the elderly? Eur J Surg Oncol 2021; 47:2692-2693. [PMID: 34020807 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.05.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2021] [Accepted: 05/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Sivesh K Kamarajah
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, University Hospital Birmingham NHS Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | | | - Hamza Umar
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Tripoli, Tripoli, Libya
| | - Manjunath S Subramanya
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, University Hospital Birmingham NHS Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Richard Pt Evans
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, University Hospital Birmingham NHS Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Susan L Powell
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Worcestershire Acute Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Worcestershire, United Kingdom
| | - Ewen A Griffiths
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, University Hospital Birmingham NHS Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Fischer CP, Hu QL, Wescott AB, Maggard-Gibbons M, Hoyt DB, Ko CY. Evidence Review for the American College of Surgeons Quality Verification Part II: Processes for Reliable Quality Improvement. J Am Coll Surg 2021; 233:294-311.e1. [PMID: 33940183 DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2021.03.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2021] [Revised: 03/10/2021] [Accepted: 03/10/2021] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
After decades of experience supporting surgical quality and safety by the American College of Surgeons, the American College of Surgeons Quality Verification Program was developed to help hospitals improve surgical quality, safety, and reliability. This review is the second of a 3-part review aiming to synthesize the evidence supporting the main principles of the American College of Surgeons Quality Verification Program. Evidence was systematically reviewed for 5 principles: case review, peer review, credentialing and privileging, data for surveillance, and continuous quality improvement using data. MEDLINE was searched for articles published from inception to January 2019 and 2 reviewers independently screened studies for inclusion in a hierarchical fashion, extracted data, and summarized results in a narrative fashion. A total of 9,098 studies across the 5 principles were identified. After exclusion criteria, a total of 184 studies in systematic reviews and primary studies were included for assessment. The identified literature supports the importance of standardized processes and systems to identify problems and improve quality of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chelsea P Fischer
- Division of Research and Optimal Patient Care, American College of Surgeons, Chicago; Department of Surgery, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL.
| | - Q Lina Hu
- Division of Research and Optimal Patient Care, American College of Surgeons, Chicago; Department of Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Annie B Wescott
- Galter Library & Learning Center, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago
| | - Melinda Maggard-Gibbons
- Department of Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
| | - David B Hoyt
- Division of Research and Optimal Patient Care, American College of Surgeons, Chicago
| | - Clifford Y Ko
- Division of Research and Optimal Patient Care, American College of Surgeons, Chicago; Department of Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; THIS Institute, University of Cambridge, UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate the frequency, nature, and severity of intraoperative adverse near miss events within advanced laparoscopic surgery and report any associated clinical impact. BACKGROUND Despite implementation of surgical safety initiatives, the intraoperative period is poorly documented with evidence of underreporting. Near miss analyses are undertaken in high-risk industries but not in surgical practice. METHODS Case video and data from 2 laparoscopic total mesorectal excision randomized controlled trials were analyzed (ALaCaRT ACTRN12609000663257, 2D3D ISRCTN59485808). Intraoperative adverse events were identified and categorized using the observational clinical human reliability analysis technique. The EAES classification was applied by 2 blinded assessors. EAES grade 1 events (nonconsequential error, no damage, or need for correction) were considered near misses. Associated clinical impact was assessed with early morbidity and histopathology outcomes. RESULTS One hundred seventy-five cases contained 1113 error events. Six hundred ninety-eight (62.7%) were near misses (median 3, IQR 2-5, range 0-15) with excellent inter-rater and test-retest reliability (κ=0.86, 95% CI 0.83-0.89, P < 0.001 and κ=0.88, 95% CI 0.85-0.9, P < 0.001 respectively). Significantly more near misses were seen in patients who developed early complications (4 (3-6) vs. 3 (2-4), P < 0.001). Higher numbers of near misses were seen in patients with more numerous (P = 0.002) and more serious early complications (P = 0.003). Cases containing major intraoperative adverse events contained significantly more near misses (5 (3-7) vs. 3 (2-5), P < 0.001) with a major event observed for every 19.4 near misses. CONCLUSION Intraoperative adverse events and near misses can be reliably and objectively captured in advanced laparoscopic surgery. Near misses are commonplace and closely associated with morbidity outcomes.
Collapse
|
18
|
Butterworth JW, Boshier PR, Mavroveli S, Van Lanschot JB, Sasako M, Reynolds JV, Hanna GB. Challenges to quality assurance of surgical interventions in clinical oncology trials: A systematic review. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY 2021; 47:748-756. [PMID: 33059943 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.10.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2020] [Revised: 09/22/2020] [Accepted: 10/02/2020] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
Where surgery forms the primary curative modality in surgical oncology trials the quality of this intervention has the potential to directly influence outcomes. Many trials however lack a robust framework to ensure surgical quality. We aim to report existing published challenges to quality assurance of surgical interventions within oncological trials. A systematic on-line literature search of Embase and Medline identified 34 relevant studies, including 19 RCTs, 11 further analyses of the primary RCTs, and 4 trial protocols. Inclusion criteria: oncological RCTs with a surgical intervention and/or associated publications relevant to the research question; 'Challenges to quality assurance of surgery in clinical oncology trials'. Selected articles were assessed by two reviewers to identify reported challenges to quality assurance of surgical intervention within these trials. Reported challenges to surgical quality could be classified as those affecting credentialing, standardisation and monitoring of surgical interventions. Constraints of using case volume for credentialing surgeons; inter-centre variation in the definition and execution of interventions; insufficient training, and monitoring of surgical quality, were the most commonly encountered challenges within each of these three domains. Findings confirmed an inadequacy in the implementation and reporting of effective surgical quality assurance measures. The surgical community should enable implementation of agreed upon mitigating strategies to overcome challenges to surgical quality in oncology trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Piers R Boshier
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, UK
| | | | | | | | - John V Reynolds
- Department of Surgery, Trinity Translational Medicine Institute, St. James's Hospital, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland
| | - George B Hanna
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Wiggins T, Pournaras DJ, Priestman E, Osborne A, Titcomb DR, Finlay I, Hopkins J, Hollyman M, Mason M, Noble H, Mahon D, Welbourn R. Effect of Preoperative Weight Loss and Baseline Comorbidity on Short-Term Complications and Reoperations After Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass in 2,067 Patients. Obes Surg 2021; 31:2444-2452. [PMID: 33768433 DOI: 10.1007/s11695-021-05331-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2021] [Revised: 02/23/2021] [Accepted: 02/26/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Decreasing popularity of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) in bariatric-metabolic surgery may be due to higher perceived peri-operative complications. There are few studies on whether preoperative weight loss can reduce complications or reoperations following RYGB. We investigated this using a standardised operative technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS Retrospective single-centre study of RYGB from 2004 to 2019 using a prospective database. Preoperative behavioural management included intentional weight loss. Maximum preoperative weight, weight on the day of operation, and Obesity-Surgery Mortality Risk Score (OS-MRS) class were recorded. Short-term outcomes (post-operative stay, 30-day complication and reoperation rates) were analysed. RESULTS In 2,067 RYGB patients (1,901 primary and 166 revisional), median preoperative total body weight loss (TWL) was 6.2% (IQR: 2.5-10.7%). The median age was 46 (interquartile range (IQR) 38-54) and 80.4% were female (n=1,661). For primary surgery, the median body mass index (BMI) was 47.6 kg/m2 (IQR: 43.1-53.3). Excluding the 100-procedure learning curve, the complication rate for primary cases was 4.4% and reoperation rate of 2.8% and one peri-operative mortality (0.06%). OS-MRS ≥2 (class B or C) predicted higher risk of complications (6.1%) compared to those with a score <2 (class A) (3.8%, p=0.021), but not reoperations. Five percent preoperative TWL did not decrease complications compared to <5% TWL. Patients with ≥10% TWL had greater baseline risk and had an increased risk of complications (6.6% vs 3.7%, p=0.017) and reoperations (4.5% vs 2.7%, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS RYGB performed using a standardised technique has low overall risk. The influence of preoperative weight loss on outcomes was inconsistent.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tom Wiggins
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal and Bariatric Surgery, Musgrove Park Hospital, Taunton, TA1 5DA, UK
| | - Dimitri J Pournaras
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal and Bariatric Surgery, Musgrove Park Hospital, Taunton, TA1 5DA, UK
| | - Elena Priestman
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal and Bariatric Surgery, Musgrove Park Hospital, Taunton, TA1 5DA, UK
| | - Alan Osborne
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal and Bariatric Surgery, Musgrove Park Hospital, Taunton, TA1 5DA, UK
| | - Daniel R Titcomb
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal and Bariatric Surgery, Musgrove Park Hospital, Taunton, TA1 5DA, UK
| | - Ian Finlay
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal and Bariatric Surgery, Musgrove Park Hospital, Taunton, TA1 5DA, UK
| | - James Hopkins
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal and Bariatric Surgery, Musgrove Park Hospital, Taunton, TA1 5DA, UK
| | - Marianne Hollyman
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal and Bariatric Surgery, Musgrove Park Hospital, Taunton, TA1 5DA, UK
| | - Matthew Mason
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal and Bariatric Surgery, Musgrove Park Hospital, Taunton, TA1 5DA, UK
| | - Hamish Noble
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal and Bariatric Surgery, Musgrove Park Hospital, Taunton, TA1 5DA, UK
| | - David Mahon
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal and Bariatric Surgery, Musgrove Park Hospital, Taunton, TA1 5DA, UK
| | - Richard Welbourn
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal and Bariatric Surgery, Musgrove Park Hospital, Taunton, TA1 5DA, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
van der Veen A, Brenkman HJF, Seesing MFJ, Haverkamp L, Luyer MDP, Nieuwenhuijzen GAP, Stoot JHMB, Tegels JJW, Wijnhoven BPL, Lagarde SM, de Steur WO, Hartgrink HH, Kouwenhoven EA, Wassenaar EB, Draaisma WA, Gisbertz SS, van der Peet DL, May AM, Ruurda JP, van Hillegersberg R. Laparoscopic Versus Open Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer (LOGICA): A Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial. J Clin Oncol 2021; 39:978-989. [PMID: 34581617 DOI: 10.1200/jco.20.01540] [Citation(s) in RCA: 113] [Impact Index Per Article: 37.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The oncological efficacy and safety of laparoscopic gastrectomy are under debate for the Western population with predominantly advanced gastric cancer undergoing multimodality treatment. METHODS In 10 experienced upper GI centers in the Netherlands, patients with resectable (cT1-4aN0-3bM0) gastric adenocarcinoma were randomly assigned to either laparoscopic or open gastrectomy. No masking was performed. The primary outcome was hospital stay. Analyses were performed by intention to treat. It was hypothesized that laparoscopic gastrectomy leads to shorter hospital stay, less postoperative complications, and equal oncological outcomes. RESULTS Between 2015 and 2018, a total of 227 patients were randomly assigned to laparoscopic (n = 115) or open gastrectomy (n = 112). Preoperative chemotherapy was administered to 77 patients (67%) in the laparoscopic group and 87 patients (78%) in the open group. Median hospital stay was 7 days (interquartile range, 5-9) in both groups (P = .34). Median blood loss was less in the laparoscopic group (150 v 300 mL, P < .001), whereas mean operating time was longer (216 v 182 minutes, P < .001). Both groups did not differ regarding postoperative complications (44% v 42%, P = .91), in-hospital mortality (4% v 7%, P = .40), 30-day readmission rate (9.6% v 9.1%, P = 1.00), R0 resection rate (95% v 95%, P = 1.00), median lymph node yield (29 v 29 nodes, P = .49), 1-year overall survival (76% v 78%, P = .74), and global health-related quality of life up to 1 year postoperatively (mean differences between + 1.5 and + 3.6 on a 1-100 scale; 95% CIs include zero). CONCLUSION Laparoscopic gastrectomy did not lead to a shorter hospital stay in this Western multicenter randomized trial of patients with predominantly advanced gastric cancer. Postoperative complications and oncological efficacy did not differ between laparoscopic gastrectomy and open gastrectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arjen van der Veen
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Hylke J F Brenkman
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Maarten F J Seesing
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Leonie Haverkamp
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Misha D P Luyer
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | | | - Jan H M B Stoot
- Department of Surgery, Zuyderland Medical Center, Heerlen and Sittard-Geleen, the Netherlands
| | - Juul J W Tegels
- Department of Surgery, Zuyderland Medical Center, Heerlen and Sittard-Geleen, the Netherlands
| | - Bas P L Wijnhoven
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Sjoerd M Lagarde
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Wobbe O de Steur
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Henk H Hartgrink
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | | | | | - Werner A Draaisma
- Department of Surgery, Meander Medical Center, Amersfoort, the Netherlands
| | - Suzanne S Gisbertz
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Location AMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Donald L van der Peet
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Location VUmc, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Anne M May
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Jelle P Ruurda
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Richard van Hillegersberg
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Moloney K, Janda M, Frumovitz M, Leitao M, Abu-Rustum NR, Rossi E, Nicklin JL, Plante M, Lecuru FR, Buda A, Mariani A, Leung Y, Ferguson SE, Pareja R, Kimmig R, Tong PSY, McNally O, Chetty N, Liu K, Jaaback K, Lau J, Ng SYJ, Falconer H, Persson J, Land R, Martinelli F, Garrett A, Altman A, Pendlebury A, Cibula D, Altamirano R, Brennan D, Ind TE, De Kroon C, Tse KY, Hanna G, Obermair A. Development of a surgical competency assessment tool for sentinel lymph node dissection by minimally invasive surgery for endometrial cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2021; 31:647-655. [PMID: 33664126 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2020-002315] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2020] [Revised: 02/02/2021] [Accepted: 02/04/2021] [Indexed: 02/02/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Sentinel lymph node dissection is widely used in the staging of endometrial cancer. Variation in surgical techniques potentially impacts diagnostic accuracy and oncologic outcomes, and poses barriers to the comparison of outcomes across institutions or clinical trial sites. Standardization of surgical technique and surgical quality assessment tools are critical to the conduct of clinical trials. By identifying mandatory and prohibited steps of sentinel lymph node (SLN) dissection in endometrial cancer, the purpose of this study was to develop and validate a competency assessment tool for use in surgical quality assurance. METHODS A Delphi methodology was applied, included 35 expert gynecological oncology surgeons from 16 countries. Interviews identified key steps and tasks which were rated mandatory, optional, or prohibited using questionnaires. Using the surgical steps for which consensus was achieved, a competency assessment tool was developed and subjected to assessments of validity and reliability. RESULTS Seventy percent consensus agreement standardized the specific mandatory, optional, and prohibited steps of SLN dissection for endometrial cancer and informed the development of a competency assessment tool. Consensus agreement identified 21 mandatory and three prohibited steps to complete a SLN dissection. The competency assessment tool was used to rate surgical quality in three preselected videos, demonstrating clear separation in the rating of the skill level displayed with mean skills summary scores differing significantly between the three videos (F score=89.4; P<0.001). Internal consistency of the items was high (Cronbach α=0.88). CONCLUSION Specific mandatory and prohibited steps of SLN dissection in endometrial cancer have been identified and validated based on consensus among a large number of international experts. A competency assessment tool is now available and can be used for surgeon selection in clinical trials and for ongoing, prospective quality assurance in routine clinical care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristen Moloney
- Gynaecologic Oncology, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, Queensland, Australia
| | - Monika Janda
- Centre for Health Services Research, The University of Queensland Faculty of Medicine, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Michael Frumovitz
- Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Mario Leitao
- Gynecology Service Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Nadeem R Abu-Rustum
- Gynecology Service Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Emma Rossi
- Obstetrics and Gynecology, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - James L Nicklin
- Gynaecological Oncology, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, Queensland, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia
| | - Marie Plante
- Gynecology Oncology Service, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec-Université Laval, Quebec, Quebec, Canada
| | - Fabrice R Lecuru
- Surgical Oncology, Institute Curie, Paris, France.,Surgical Oncology Department for Breast and Gynecology, Universite de Paris, Paris, Île-de-France, France
| | - Alessandro Buda
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Università degli Studi Milano-Bicocca, San Gerardo Hospital, Monza, Italy.,Division of Gynecologic Oncology Italy, Ospedale Michele e Pietro Ferrero, Verduno (CN), Italy
| | - Andrea Mariani
- Gynecologic Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Yee Leung
- Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The University of Western Australia Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Sarah Elizabeth Ferguson
- Gynecologic Oncology, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Rene Pareja
- Gynecologic Oncology, Instituto Nacional de Cancerologia, Bogota, Colombia.,Gynecologic Oncology, Clínica De Oncología Astorga, Medellín, Colombia
| | - Rainer Kimmig
- Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Essen, Essen, Germany
| | | | - Orla McNally
- Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Royal Women's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.,Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Naven Chetty
- Gynaecologic Oncology, Mater Health Services Brisbane, South Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Kaijiang Liu
- Gynecology and Obstetrics, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine Affiliated Renji Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Ken Jaaback
- Gynaecologic Oncology, John Hunter Hospital, New Lambton Heights, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Julio Lau
- Gynecology Oncology, Hospital General San Juan de Dios, Guatemala, Guatemala.,Gynecology Oncology, University of San Carlos de Guatemala Faculty of Medical Sciences, Guatemala, Guatemala
| | | | - Henrik Falconer
- Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.,Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Jan Persson
- Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Skanes Universitetssjukhus Lund, Lund, Skåne, Sweden.,Clinical Sciences, Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Lund University Faculty of Medicine, Lund, Sweden
| | - Russell Land
- Gynaecologic Oncology, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, Queensland, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia
| | - Fabio Martinelli
- Gynaecologic Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Garrett
- Gynaecologic Oncology, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, Queensland, Australia
| | - Alon Altman
- Gynecologic Oncology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.,Gynecologic Oncology, CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Adam Pendlebury
- Gynaecological Oncology, Mercy Hospital for Women, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
| | - David Cibula
- Gynecology and Obstetrics, Charles University First Faculty of Medicine, Praha, Praha, Czech Republic.,Gynecology and Obstetrics, General University Hospital in Prague, Praha, Czech Republic
| | - Roberto Altamirano
- Gynecology Oncology, Universidad de Chile, Santiago de Chile, Chile.,Gynecology Oncology, Hospital Clinico San Borja Arriaran, Santiago, Chile
| | - Donal Brennan
- Gynaecology Oncology, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.,School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Thomas Edward Ind
- Gynaecological Oncology, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,Gynaecology, St George's University of London, London, UK
| | - Cornelis De Kroon
- Gynecology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands
| | - Ka Yu Tse
- Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Hong Kong Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - George Hanna
- Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Andreas Obermair
- Center for Clinical Research, Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Herston, Queensland, Australia .,Queensland Centre for Gynaecologic Cancer Research, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, Queensland, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Lai Y, Zeng X, Zhou K, Zhou X, Liu Y, Hu Y. End to end intussusception anastomosis decreases the risk of anastomotic leakage after neoadjvant chemoradiation and McKeown oesophagectomy. Radiother Oncol 2021; 158:285-292. [PMID: 33662437 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.02.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2020] [Revised: 02/19/2021] [Accepted: 02/19/2021] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE To investigate the relationship between the radiation dose to the anastomotic region and postoperative anastomotic leakage rates after McKeown oesophagectomy with cervical anastomosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS Between January 2017 and December 2019, 164 consecutive patients undergoing trimodal therapy including neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and sequential McKeown oesophagectomy were included. The demographic and clinical patient data were collected. Additionally, the radiation dose to the regions including the mediastinum, airway, gastric fundus and anastomotic region was recalculated. RESULTS Twelve patients presented with anastomotic leakage, accounting for 7.3% (12/164) of the cohort. The anastomoses were located in the radiation field for all patients with anastomotic leakage (12/12, 100%), and for 61.8% (94/152) of those without (P = 0.009). Higher radiation doses, including the D50 and the mean, maximal and minimal doses to the oesophageal anastomotic region were found in the anastomotic leak group. Subgroup analysis between patients with end to end (ETE) anastomosis and ETE intussusception anastomosis revealed a lower anastomotic leakage rate in the latter after 1:1 ratio propensity score-matching (10.4% vs. 1.3%, P = 0.034). CONCLUSION Anastomosis location in the radiation field and a higher radiation dose to the oesophageal anastomotic region were associated with the occurrence of anastomotic leakage after trimodal therapy. Compared with ETE anastomosis, ETE intussusception anastomosis might reduce the occurrence of anastomotic leakage after neoadjuvant chemoradiation and subsequent McKeown oesophagectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yutian Lai
- Department of Lung Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, PR China
| | - Xiaoxiao Zeng
- Department of Oncology, the People's Hospital of Jian Yang, Jian Yang, PR China
| | - Kun Zhou
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, PR China
| | - Xiaojuan Zhou
- Department of Oncology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, PR China
| | - Yongmei Liu
- Department of Oncology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, PR China.
| | - Yang Hu
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, PR China.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Curtis NJ, Foster JD, Miskovic D, Brown CSB, Hewett PJ, Abbott S, Hanna GB, Stevenson ARL, Francis NK. Association of Surgical Skill Assessment With Clinical Outcomes in Cancer Surgery. JAMA Surg 2021; 155:590-598. [PMID: 32374371 DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.1004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 92] [Impact Index Per Article: 30.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Importance Complex surgical interventions are inherently prone to variation yet they are not objectively measured. The reasons for outcome differences following cancer surgery are unclear. Objective To quantify surgical skill within advanced laparoscopic procedures and its association with histopathological and clinical outcomes. Design, Setting, and Participants This analysis of data and video from the Australasian Laparoscopic Cancer of Rectum (ALaCaRT) and 2-dimensional/3-dimensional (2D3D) multicenter randomized laparoscopic total mesorectal excision trials, which were conducted at 28 centers in Australia, the United Kingdom, and New Zealand, was performed from 2018 to 2019 and included 176 patients with clinical T1 to T3 rectal adenocarcinoma 15 cm or less from the anal verge. Case videos underwent blinded objective analysis using a bespoke performance assessment tool developed with a 62-international expert Delphi exercise and workshop, interview, and pilot phases. Interventions Laparoscopic total mesorectal excision undertaken with curative intent by 34 credentialed surgeons. Main Outcomes and Measures Histopathological (plane of mesorectal dissection, ALaCaRT composite end point success [mesorectal fascial plane, circumferential margin, ≥1 mm; distal margin, ≥1 mm]) and 30-day morbidity. End points were analyzed using surgeon quartiles defined by tool scores. Results The laparoscopic total mesorectal excision performance tool was produced and shown to be reliable and valid for the specialist level (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.889; 95% CI, 0.832-0.926; P < .001). A substantial variation in tool scores was recorded (range, 25-48). Scores were associated with the number of intraoperative errors, plane of mesorectal dissection, and short-term patient morbidity, including the number and severity of complications. Upper quartile-scoring surgeons obtained excellent results compared with the lower quartile (mesorectal fascial plane: 93% vs 59%; number needed to treat [NNT], 2.9, P = .002; ALaCaRT end point success, 83% vs 58%; NNT, 4; P = .03; 30-day morbidity, 23% vs 50%; NNT, 3.7; P = .03). Conclusions and Relevance Intraoperative surgical skill can be objectively and reliably measured in complex cancer interventions. Substantial variation in technical performance among credentialed surgeons is seen and significantly associated with clinical and pathological outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nathan J Curtis
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, England.,Department of General Surgery, Yeovil District Hospital National Health Service Foundation Trust, Yeovil, England
| | - Jake D Foster
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, England.,Department of General Surgery, Yeovil District Hospital National Health Service Foundation Trust, Yeovil, England
| | | | - Chris S B Brown
- National Health and Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Peter J Hewett
- Department of Surgery, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Sarah Abbott
- Canterbury District Health Board, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - George B Hanna
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, England
| | - Andrew R L Stevenson
- Faculty of Medical and Biomedical Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.,Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Queensland, Australia
| | - Nader K Francis
- Department of General Surgery, Yeovil District Hospital National Health Service Foundation Trust, Yeovil, England.,University College London, London, England
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Markar SR, Ni M, Gisbertz SS, van der Werf L, Straatman J, van der Peet D, Cuesta MA, Hanna GB, van Berge Henegouwen MI. Implementation of Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy From a Randomized Controlled Trial Setting to National Practice. J Clin Oncol 2020; 38:2130-2139. [PMID: 32421440 DOI: 10.1200/jco.19.02483] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of this study was to examine the external validity of the randomized TIME trial, when minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) was implemented nationally in the Netherlands, using data from the Dutch Upper GI Cancer Audit (DUCA) for transthoracic esophagectomy. METHODS Original patient data from the TIME trial were extracted along with data from the DUCA dataset (2011-2017). Multivariate analysis, with adjustment for patient factors, tumor factors, and year of surgery, was performed for the effect of MIE versus open esophagectomy on clinical outcomes. RESULTS One hundred fifteen patients from the TIME trial (59 MIE v 56 open) and 4,605 patients from the DUCA dataset (2,652 MIE v 1,953 open) were included. In the TIME trial, univariate analysis showed that MIE reduced pulmonary complications and length of hospital stay. On the contrary, in the DUCA dataset, MIE was associated with increased total and pulmonary complications and reoperations; however, benefits included increased proportion of R0 margin and lymph nodes harvested, and reduced 30-day mortality. Multivariate analysis from the TIME trial showed that MIE reduced pulmonary complications (odds ratio [OR], 0.19; 95% CI, 0.06 to 0.61). In the DUCA dataset, MIE was associated with increased total complications (OR, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.19 to 1.57), pulmonary complications (OR, 1.50; 95% CI, 1.29 to 1.74), reoperations (OR, 1.74; 95% CI, 1.42 to 2.14), and length of hospital stay. Multivariate analysis of the combined and MIE datasets showed that inclusion in the TIME trial was associated with a reduction in reoperations, Clavien-Dindo grade > 1 complications, and length of hospital stay. CONCLUSION When adopted nationally outside the TIME trial, MIE was associated with an increase in total and pulmonary complications and reoperation rate. This may reflect nonexpert surgeons outside of high-volume centers performing this minimally invasive technique in a nonstandardized fashion outside of a controlled environment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sheraz R Markar
- Department Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Melody Ni
- Department Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Suzanne S Gisbertz
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Leonie van der Werf
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jennifer Straatman
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Donald van der Peet
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Miguel A Cuesta
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - George B Hanna
- Department Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Mark I van Berge Henegouwen
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Laparoscopic Versus Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Ann Surg 2020; 271:54-66. [PMID: 30973388 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000003309] [Citation(s) in RCA: 184] [Impact Index Per Article: 46.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) to open pancreaticoduodenectomy (OPD) using evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs). BACKGROUND LPD is used more commonly, but this surge is mostly based on observational data. METHODS We searched CENTRAL, Medline and Web of Science for RCTs comparing minimally invasive to OPD for adults with benign or malignant disease requiring elective pancreaticoduodenectomy. Main outcomes were 90-day mortality, Clavien-Dindo ≥3 complications, and length of hospital stay (LOS). Secondary outcomes were postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF), delayed gastric emptying (DGE), postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH), bile leak, blood loss, reoperation, readmission, oncologic outcomes (R0-resection, lymph nodes harvested), and operative times. Data were pooled as odds ratio (OR) or mean difference (MD) with a random-effects model. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Tool and the GRADE approach (Prospero registration ID: CRD42019120363). RESULTS Three RCTs with a total of 224 patients were included. Meta-analysis showed there were no significant differences regarding 90-day mortality, Clavien-Dindo ≥3 complications, LOS, POPF, DGE, PPH, bile leak, reoperation, readmission, or oncologic outcomes between LPD and OPD. Operative times were significantly longer for LPD {MD [95% confidence interval (CI)] 95.44 minutes (24.06-166.81 minutes)}, whereas blood loss was lower for LPD [MD (CI) -150.99 mL (-168.54 to -133.44 mL)]. Certainty of evidence was moderate to very low. CONCLUSIONS At current level of evidence, LPD shows no advantage over OPD. Limitations include high risk of bias and moderate to very low certainty of evidence. Further studies should focus on patient safety during LPD learning curves and the potential role of robotic surgery.
Collapse
|
26
|
Surgical Quality Assurance in COLOR III: Standardization and Competency Assessment in a Randomized Controlled Trial. Ann Surg 2020; 270:768-774. [PMID: 31573984 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000003537] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to develop an objective and reliable surgical quality assurance system (SQA) for COLOR III, an international multicenter randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) with laparoscopic approach for rectal cancer. BACKGROUND OF SUMMARY DATA SQA influences outcome measures in RCTs such as lymph nodes harvest, in-hospital mortality, and locoregional cancer recurrence. However, levels of SQA are variable. METHOD Hierarchical task analysis of TaTME was performed. A 4-round Delphi methodology was applied for standardization of TaTME steps. Semistructured interviews were conducted in round 1 to identify key steps and tasks, which were rated as mandatory, optional, or prohibited in rounds 2 to 4 using questionnaires. Competency assessment tool (CAT) was developed and its content validity was examined by expert surgeons. Twenty unedited videos were assessed to test reliability using generalizability theory. RESULTS Eighty-three of 101 surgical tasks identified reached 70% agreement (26 mandatory, 56 optional, and 1 prohibited). An operative guide of standardized TaTME was created. CAT is matrix of 9 steps and 4 performance qualities: exposure, execution, adverse event, and end-product. The overall G-coefficient was 0.883. Inter-rater and interitem reliability were 0.883 and 0.986. To enter COLOR III, 2 unedited TaTME and 1 laparoscopic TME videos were submitted and assessed by 2 independent assessors using CAT. CONCLUSION We described an iterative approach to develop an objective SQA within multicenter RCT. This approach provided standardization, the development of reliable and valid CAT, and the criteria for trial entry and monitoring surgical performance during the trial.
Collapse
|
27
|
Zhang D, Zhang H, Wang X, Hu B, Zhang F, Wei H, Li L. LINC01518 knockdown inhibits tumorigenicity by suppression of PIK3CA/Akt pathway in oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma. ARTIFICIAL CELLS NANOMEDICINE AND BIOTECHNOLOGY 2019; 47:4284-4292. [PMID: 31810385 DOI: 10.1080/21691401.2019.1699815] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/09/2023]
Abstract
LncRNA LINC01518 was previously reported to be upregulated in oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) tissues compared with normal tissues. However, there are no previous studies concerning the specific function and molecular mechanism of LINC01518 in ESCC. LINC01518 and miR-1-3p expression levels in ESCC cells were detected by qRT-PCR. Cell proliferation and apoptosis were evaluated by CCK-8 and flow cytometry analysis, respectively. The relationships between LINC01518, phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase catalytic subunit α (PIK3CA) and miR-1-3p were explored by luciferase reporter assay. The alteration of the PIK3CA/protein kinase B (Akt) pathway was examined by Western blot. We found that LINC01518 expression was upregulated and miR-1-3p expression was downregulated in ESCC cells. LINC01518 knockdown inhibited cell proliferation and promoted apoptosis in ESCC cells. In addition, LINC01518 functioned as a competing endogenous RNA (ceRNA) for miR-1-3p in ESCC cells and miR-1-3p downregulation blocked the effects of LINC01518 knockdown on cell proliferation and apoptosis in ESCC cells. Moreover, PIK3CA was identified as a target of miR-1-3p and LINC01518 knockdown inhibited the PIK3CA/Akt pathway by upregulating miR-1-3p in ESCC cells. In conclusion, LINC01518 knockdown inhibited tumorigenicity in ESCC cells by suppression of PIK3CA/Akt pathway through upregulating miR-1-3p.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Donghong Zhang
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Huaihe Hospital of Henan University, Kaifeng, P. R. China
| | - Haifeng Zhang
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Huaihe Hospital of Henan University, Kaifeng, P. R. China
| | - Xiaolong Wang
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Huaihe Hospital of Henan University, Kaifeng, P. R. China
| | - Baoli Hu
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Huaihe Hospital of Henan University, Kaifeng, P. R. China
| | - Feng Zhang
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Huaihe Hospital of Henan University, Kaifeng, P. R. China
| | - Haitao Wei
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Huaihe Hospital of Henan University, Kaifeng, P. R. China
| | - Li Li
- School of Nursing and Health, Henan University, Kaifeng, P. R. China
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Markar SR, Lagergren J. Surgical and Surgeon-Related Factors Related to Long-Term Survival in Esophageal Cancer: A Review. Ann Surg Oncol 2019; 27:718-723. [PMID: 31691111 PMCID: PMC7000496 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-019-07966-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2019] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
Esophagectomy is the mainstay of curative treatment for most patients with a diagnosis of esophageal cancer. This procedure needs to be optimized to secure the best possible chance of cure for these patients. Research comparing various surgical approaches of esophagectomy generally has failed to identify any major differences in long-term prognosis. Comparisons between minimally invasive and open esophagectomy, transthoracic and transhiatal approaches, radical and moderate lymphadenectomy, and high and moderate hospital volume generally have provided only moderate alterations in long-term survival rates after adjustment for established prognostic factors. In contrast, some direct surgeon-related factors, which remain independent of known prognostic factors, seem to influence the long-term survival more strongly in esophageal cancer. Annual surgeon volume is strongly prognostic, and recent studies have suggested the existence of long surgeon proficiency gain curves for achievement of stable 5-year survival rates and possibly also a prognostic influence of surgeon age and weekday of surgery. The available literature indicates a potentially more critical role of the individual surgeon’s skills than that of variations in surgical approach for optimizing the long-term survival after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. This finding points to the value of paying more attention to how the skills of the individual esophageal cancer surgeon can best be achieved and maintained. Careful selection and evaluation of the most suitable candidates, appropriate and structured training programs, and regular peer-review assessments of experienced surgeons may be helpful in this respect.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sheraz R Markar
- Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, NS 67, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Jesper Lagergren
- Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, NS 67, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. .,School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Laparoscopic versus open subtotal gastrectomy for adenocarcinoma of the stomach in a Western population: peri-operative and 5-year oncological outcomes. Surg Endosc 2019; 34:3818-3826. [DOI: 10.1007/s00464-019-07146-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2018] [Accepted: 09/24/2019] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
|
30
|
Surgicopathological Quality Control and Protocol Adherence to Lymphadenectomy in the CRITICS Gastric Cancer Trial. Ann Surg 2019; 268:1008-1013. [PMID: 28817437 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000002444] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to evaluate surgicopathological quality and protocol adherence for lymphadenectomy in the CRITICS trial. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Surgical quality assurance is a key element in multimodal studies for gastric cancer. In the multicenter CRITICS trial (ChemoRadiotherapy after Induction chemotherapy In Cancer of the Stomach), patients with resectable gastric cancer were randomized for preoperative chemotherapy, followed by gastrectomy with a D1+ lymphadenectomy (removal of stations 1 to 9 and 11), followed by either chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy. METHODS Surgicopathological compliance was defined as removal of ≥15 lymph nodes. Surgical compliance was defined as removal of the indicated lymph node stations. Surgical contamination was defined as removal of lymph node stations that should be left in situ. The Maruyama Index (MI, lower is better), which has proven to be an indicator of surgical quality and is strongly associated with survival, was analyzed. RESULTS Between 2007 and 2015, 788 patients were randomized, of whom 636 patients underwent a gastrectomy with curative intent. Surgicopathological compliance occurred in 72.8% (n = 460) of the patients and improved from 55.0% (2007) to 90.0% (2015). Surgical compliance occurred in 41.1% (n = 256). Surgical contamination occurred in 59.6% (n = 371). Median MI was 1 (range 0 to 136). CONCLUSION Surgical quality in the CRITICS trial was excellent, with a MI of 1. Surgicopathological compliance improved over the years. This might be explained by the quality assurance program within the study and centralization of gastric cancer surgery in the Netherlands.
Collapse
|
31
|
Koch OO, Weitzendorfer M, Varga M, Tschoner A, Partl R, Perathoner A, Gehwolf P, Kapp KS, Függer R, Öfner D, Emmanuel K. Perioperative chemotherapy versus neoadjuvant chemoradiation for patients with adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus in Austria: a retrospective analysis. World J Surg Oncol 2019; 17:146. [PMID: 31426805 PMCID: PMC6701048 DOI: 10.1186/s12957-019-1693-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2019] [Accepted: 08/13/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The aim of this study was to compare the outcome of patients with adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus (AEG type I) treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation or perioperative chemotherapy. Methods Eligible patients from four Austrian centers were selected to conduct a retrospective analysis. All patients treated between January 2007 and October 2017 with chemotherapy according to EOX-protocol (Epirubicin, Oxaliplatin, Xeloda) or chemoradiation according to CROSS-protocol (carboplatin/paclitaxel + RTX 41.4 Gy), before esophagectomy were included. Primary outcomes disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) as well as secondary outcomes downstaging of T- or N-stage and achievement of pathological complete response pCR (ypT0N0M0) were analyzed. Data of 119 patients were included. Results Complete data was available in 104 patients, 53 patients in the chemoradiation group and 51 patients in the chemotherapy group. The mean number of lymph nodes removed was significantly higher in the EOX group (EOX 29 ± 15.5 vs. CROSS 22 ± 8.8; p < 0.05). Median follow-up in the CROSS group was 17 months (CI 95% 8.8–25.2) and in the EOX group 37 months (CI 95% 26.5–47.5). In the chemotherapy group, the OS rate after half a year, − 1, and 3 years was 92%, 75%, and 51%. After chemoradiation, overall survival after half a year was 85 %, after 1 year 66%, and after 3 years 17%. In the EOX group DFS after ½, − 1, and 3 years was 90%, 73%, and 45%, in the chemoradiation group after half a year 81%, after 1 year 55% and after 3 years 15%. Pathological complete response (pCR) was achieved in 23% of patients after CROSS and in 10% after EOX (p < 0.000). Conclusions There seem to be clear advantages for chemoradiation, concerning the major response of the primary tumor, whereas a tendency in favor for chemotherapy is seen in regards to systemic tumor control. Furthermore, the type of neoadjuvant treatment has a significant influence on the number of lymph nodes resected.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oliver O Koch
- Department of Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.
| | - Michael Weitzendorfer
- Department of Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Martin Varga
- Department of Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Andreas Tschoner
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Ordensklinikum Linz Barmherzige Schwestern, Linz, Austria
| | - Richard Partl
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Alexander Perathoner
- Department of Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Philipp Gehwolf
- Department of Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Karin S Kapp
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Reinhold Függer
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Ordensklinikum Linz Barmherzige Schwestern, Linz, Austria
| | - Dietmar Öfner
- Department of Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Klaus Emmanuel
- Department of Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Mao CY, Yang YS, Yuan Y, Hu WP, Zhao YF, Hu Y, Che GW, Chen LQ. End-to-End Versus End-to-Side Hand-Sewn Anastomosis for Minimally Invasive McKeown Esophagectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 2019; 26:4062-4069. [DOI: 10.1245/s10434-019-07630-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2018] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
|
33
|
Zheng Y, Li Y, Liu X, Zhang R, Wang Z, Sun H, Liu S. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by minimally invasive esophagectomy versus primary surgery for management of esophageal carcinoma: a retrospective study. J Cancer 2019; 10:1097-1102. [PMID: 30854116 PMCID: PMC6400690 DOI: 10.7150/jca.29353] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2018] [Accepted: 01/04/2019] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
There is no consensus about the combined therapeutic strategy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in China. The quality control and standardization of surgery procedures were far from satisfactory in past neoadjuvant chemotherapy trials, which may underestimate the survival benefits. Therefore, we tried to evaluate the survival benefit of paclitaxel plus platinum followed by minimally invasive esophagectomy with total two-field lymphadenectomy patterns versus primary surgery. Between 06/2011 and 12/2014, there were 279 consecutive patients who underwent minimally invasive esophagectomy with total two-field lymphadenectomy; 83 received neoadjuvant chemotherapy and 196 primary surgery. Propensity score matching was used to compare neoadjuvant chemotherapy patients and 76 matched primary surgery patients. Effectiveness of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, adverse events, complications after the operation, and survival rates were evaluated. After propensity score matching, and compared with primary surgery, neoadjuvant chemotherapy was significantly associated with a better survival (P = 0.049). The overall clinical response rate of neoadjuvant chemotherapy was 77.1%. The pathological response rate was 20.5%. There was no significant difference in complication rates between two groups. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with paclitaxel plus platinum followed by minimally invasive esophagectomy and total two-field lymphadenectomy have better OS over the primary surgery without serious adverse events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yan Zheng
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan 450008, P. R. China
| | - Yin Li
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan 450008, P. R. China
| | - Xianben Liu
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan 450008, P. R. China
| | - Ruixiang Zhang
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan 450008, P. R. China
| | - Zongfei Wang
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan 450008, P. R. China
| | - Haibo Sun
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan 450008, P. R. China
| | - Shilei Liu
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan 450008, P. R. China
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Laparoscopic Lavage Versus Primary Resection for Acute Perforated Diverticulitis: Review and Meta-analysis. Ann Surg 2019; 267:252-258. [PMID: 28338510 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000002236] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare clinical outcomes after laparoscopic lavage (LL) or colonic resection (CR) for purulent diverticulitis. BACKGROUND Laparoscopic lavage has been suggested as an alternative treatment for traditional CR. Comparative studies to date have shown conflicting results. METHODS Electronic searches of Embase, Medline, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases were performed. Weighted mean differences (WMD) were calculated for effect size of continuous variables and pooled odds ratios (POR) calculated for discrete variables. RESULTS A total of 589 patients recruited from 3 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 4 comparative studies were included; 85% as Hinchey III. LL group had younger patients with higher body mass index and lower ASA grades, but comparable Hinchey classification and previous diverticulitis rates. No significant differences were noted for mortality, 30-day reoperations and unplanned readmissions. LL had higher rates of intraabdominal abscesses (POR = 2.85; 95% confidence interval, CI, 1.52-5.34; P = 0.001), peritonitis (POR = 7.80; 95% CI 2.12-28.69; P = 0.002), and increased long-term emergency reoperations (POR = 3.32; 95% CI 1.73-6.38; P < 0.001). Benefits of LL included shorter operative time, fewer cardiac complications, fewer wound infections, and shorter hospital stay. Overall, 90% had stomas after CR, of whom 74% underwent stoma reversal within 12-months. Approximately, 14% of LL patients required a stoma; 48% obtaining gut continuity within 12-months, whereas 36% underwent elective sigmoidectomy. CONCLUSIONS The preservation of diseased bowel by LL is associated with approximately 3 times greater risk of persistent peritonitis, intraabdominal abscesses and the need for emergency surgery compared with CR. Future studies should focus on developing composite predictive scores encompassing the wide variation in presentations of diverticulitis and treatment tailored on case-by-case basis.
Collapse
|
35
|
Mariette C, Markar SR, Dabakuyo-Yonli TS, Meunier B, Pezet D, Collet D, D'Journo XB, Brigand C, Perniceni T, Carrère N, Mabrut JY, Msika S, Peschaud F, Prudhomme M, Bonnetain F, Piessen G. Hybrid Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer. N Engl J Med 2019; 380:152-162. [PMID: 30625052 DOI: 10.1056/nejmoa1805101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 434] [Impact Index Per Article: 86.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Postoperative complications, especially pulmonary complications, affect more than half the patients who undergo open esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Whether hybrid minimally invasive esophagectomy results in lower morbidity than open esophagectomy is unclear. METHODS We performed a multicenter, open-label, randomized, controlled trial involving patients 18 to 75 years of age with resectable cancer of the middle or lower third of the esophagus. Patients were randomly assigned to undergo transthoracic open esophagectomy (open procedure) or hybrid minimally invasive esophagectomy (hybrid procedure). Surgical quality assurance was implemented by the credentialing of surgeons, standardization of technique, and monitoring of performance. Hybrid surgery comprised a two-field abdominal-thoracic operation (also called an Ivor-Lewis procedure) with laparoscopic gastric mobilization and open right thoracotomy. The primary end point was intraoperative or postoperative complication of grade II or higher according to the Clavien-Dindo classification (indicating major complication leading to intervention) within 30 days. Analyses were done according to the intention-to-treat principle. RESULTS From October 2009 through April 2012, we randomly assigned 103 patients to the hybrid-procedure group and 104 to the open-procedure group. A total of 312 serious adverse events were recorded in 110 patients. A total of 37 patients (36%) in the hybrid-procedure group had a major intraoperative or postoperative complication, as compared with 67 (64%) in the open-procedure group (odds ratio, 0.31; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.18 to 0.55; P<0.001). A total of 18 of 102 patients (18%) in the hybrid-procedure group had a major pulmonary complication, as compared with 31 of 103 (30%) in the open-procedure group. At 3 years, overall survival was 67% (95% CI, 57 to 75) in the hybrid-procedure group, as compared with 55% (95% CI, 45 to 64) in the open-procedure group; disease-free survival was 57% (95% CI, 47 to 66) and 48% (95% CI, 38 to 57), respectively. CONCLUSIONS We found that hybrid minimally invasive esophagectomy resulted in a lower incidence of intraoperative and postoperative major complications, specifically pulmonary complications, than open esophagectomy, without compromising overall and disease-free survival over a period of 3 years. (Funded by the French National Cancer Institute; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00937456 .).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christophe Mariette
- From the Department of Digestive and Oncologic Surgery, Claude Huriez University Hospital, and INSERM, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Lille, Unité Mixte de Recherche 1172-JPARC Jean-Pierre Aubert Research Center, Team "Mucins, epithelial differentiation, and carcinogenesis," Université de Lille, Lille (C.M., G.P.), the Epidemiology and Quality of Life Unit, INSERM Unité 1231, Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon (T.S.D.-Y.), the Department of Hepatobiliary and Digestive Surgery, CHU Rennes, University of Rennes 1, Rennes (B.M.), Université Clermont Auvergne, INSERM, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Service de Chirurgie Digestive, Clermont-Ferrand (D.P.), the Department of Digestive Surgery, Haut Lévèque University Hospital, Bordeaux (D.C.), the Department of Thoracic Surgery, Hôpital Nord, Aix-Marseille Université, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Marseille, Marseille (X.B.D.), the Department of Digestive Surgery, Strasbourg University, Strasbourg (C.B.), the Department of Digestive Surgery, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris (T.P.), the Department of Digestive Surgery, Purpan Hospital, CHU Toulouse, Université Toulouse III, Toulouse (N.C.), the Department of General Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Hôpital de la Croix-Rousse, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Equipe Mixte de Recherche 3738, Université Lyon 1, Lyon (J.-Y.M.), the Department of Digestive and General Surgery, CHU Louis Mourier, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Université Paris 7, Denis Diderot, PRES Sorbonne Paris Cité, Colombes (S.M.), the Department of Surgery and Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Ambroise Paré, AP-HP, Université de Versailles, Boulogne-Billancourt (F.P.), the Department of Digestive Surgery, CHU Nîmes, Nîmes (M.P.), and the Methodology and Quality of Life Unit in Cancer, INSERM Unité Mixte de Recherche 1098, University Hospital of Besançon, Besançon (F.B.) - all in France; and the Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College, London (S.R.M.)
| | - Sheraz R Markar
- From the Department of Digestive and Oncologic Surgery, Claude Huriez University Hospital, and INSERM, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Lille, Unité Mixte de Recherche 1172-JPARC Jean-Pierre Aubert Research Center, Team "Mucins, epithelial differentiation, and carcinogenesis," Université de Lille, Lille (C.M., G.P.), the Epidemiology and Quality of Life Unit, INSERM Unité 1231, Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon (T.S.D.-Y.), the Department of Hepatobiliary and Digestive Surgery, CHU Rennes, University of Rennes 1, Rennes (B.M.), Université Clermont Auvergne, INSERM, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Service de Chirurgie Digestive, Clermont-Ferrand (D.P.), the Department of Digestive Surgery, Haut Lévèque University Hospital, Bordeaux (D.C.), the Department of Thoracic Surgery, Hôpital Nord, Aix-Marseille Université, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Marseille, Marseille (X.B.D.), the Department of Digestive Surgery, Strasbourg University, Strasbourg (C.B.), the Department of Digestive Surgery, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris (T.P.), the Department of Digestive Surgery, Purpan Hospital, CHU Toulouse, Université Toulouse III, Toulouse (N.C.), the Department of General Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Hôpital de la Croix-Rousse, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Equipe Mixte de Recherche 3738, Université Lyon 1, Lyon (J.-Y.M.), the Department of Digestive and General Surgery, CHU Louis Mourier, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Université Paris 7, Denis Diderot, PRES Sorbonne Paris Cité, Colombes (S.M.), the Department of Surgery and Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Ambroise Paré, AP-HP, Université de Versailles, Boulogne-Billancourt (F.P.), the Department of Digestive Surgery, CHU Nîmes, Nîmes (M.P.), and the Methodology and Quality of Life Unit in Cancer, INSERM Unité Mixte de Recherche 1098, University Hospital of Besançon, Besançon (F.B.) - all in France; and the Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College, London (S.R.M.)
| | - Tienhan S Dabakuyo-Yonli
- From the Department of Digestive and Oncologic Surgery, Claude Huriez University Hospital, and INSERM, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Lille, Unité Mixte de Recherche 1172-JPARC Jean-Pierre Aubert Research Center, Team "Mucins, epithelial differentiation, and carcinogenesis," Université de Lille, Lille (C.M., G.P.), the Epidemiology and Quality of Life Unit, INSERM Unité 1231, Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon (T.S.D.-Y.), the Department of Hepatobiliary and Digestive Surgery, CHU Rennes, University of Rennes 1, Rennes (B.M.), Université Clermont Auvergne, INSERM, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Service de Chirurgie Digestive, Clermont-Ferrand (D.P.), the Department of Digestive Surgery, Haut Lévèque University Hospital, Bordeaux (D.C.), the Department of Thoracic Surgery, Hôpital Nord, Aix-Marseille Université, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Marseille, Marseille (X.B.D.), the Department of Digestive Surgery, Strasbourg University, Strasbourg (C.B.), the Department of Digestive Surgery, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris (T.P.), the Department of Digestive Surgery, Purpan Hospital, CHU Toulouse, Université Toulouse III, Toulouse (N.C.), the Department of General Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Hôpital de la Croix-Rousse, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Equipe Mixte de Recherche 3738, Université Lyon 1, Lyon (J.-Y.M.), the Department of Digestive and General Surgery, CHU Louis Mourier, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Université Paris 7, Denis Diderot, PRES Sorbonne Paris Cité, Colombes (S.M.), the Department of Surgery and Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Ambroise Paré, AP-HP, Université de Versailles, Boulogne-Billancourt (F.P.), the Department of Digestive Surgery, CHU Nîmes, Nîmes (M.P.), and the Methodology and Quality of Life Unit in Cancer, INSERM Unité Mixte de Recherche 1098, University Hospital of Besançon, Besançon (F.B.) - all in France; and the Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College, London (S.R.M.)
| | - Bernard Meunier
- From the Department of Digestive and Oncologic Surgery, Claude Huriez University Hospital, and INSERM, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Lille, Unité Mixte de Recherche 1172-JPARC Jean-Pierre Aubert Research Center, Team "Mucins, epithelial differentiation, and carcinogenesis," Université de Lille, Lille (C.M., G.P.), the Epidemiology and Quality of Life Unit, INSERM Unité 1231, Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon (T.S.D.-Y.), the Department of Hepatobiliary and Digestive Surgery, CHU Rennes, University of Rennes 1, Rennes (B.M.), Université Clermont Auvergne, INSERM, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Service de Chirurgie Digestive, Clermont-Ferrand (D.P.), the Department of Digestive Surgery, Haut Lévèque University Hospital, Bordeaux (D.C.), the Department of Thoracic Surgery, Hôpital Nord, Aix-Marseille Université, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Marseille, Marseille (X.B.D.), the Department of Digestive Surgery, Strasbourg University, Strasbourg (C.B.), the Department of Digestive Surgery, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris (T.P.), the Department of Digestive Surgery, Purpan Hospital, CHU Toulouse, Université Toulouse III, Toulouse (N.C.), the Department of General Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Hôpital de la Croix-Rousse, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Equipe Mixte de Recherche 3738, Université Lyon 1, Lyon (J.-Y.M.), the Department of Digestive and General Surgery, CHU Louis Mourier, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Université Paris 7, Denis Diderot, PRES Sorbonne Paris Cité, Colombes (S.M.), the Department of Surgery and Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Ambroise Paré, AP-HP, Université de Versailles, Boulogne-Billancourt (F.P.), the Department of Digestive Surgery, CHU Nîmes, Nîmes (M.P.), and the Methodology and Quality of Life Unit in Cancer, INSERM Unité Mixte de Recherche 1098, University Hospital of Besançon, Besançon (F.B.) - all in France; and the Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College, London (S.R.M.)
| | - Denis Pezet
- From the Department of Digestive and Oncologic Surgery, Claude Huriez University Hospital, and INSERM, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Lille, Unité Mixte de Recherche 1172-JPARC Jean-Pierre Aubert Research Center, Team "Mucins, epithelial differentiation, and carcinogenesis," Université de Lille, Lille (C.M., G.P.), the Epidemiology and Quality of Life Unit, INSERM Unité 1231, Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon (T.S.D.-Y.), the Department of Hepatobiliary and Digestive Surgery, CHU Rennes, University of Rennes 1, Rennes (B.M.), Université Clermont Auvergne, INSERM, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Service de Chirurgie Digestive, Clermont-Ferrand (D.P.), the Department of Digestive Surgery, Haut Lévèque University Hospital, Bordeaux (D.C.), the Department of Thoracic Surgery, Hôpital Nord, Aix-Marseille Université, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Marseille, Marseille (X.B.D.), the Department of Digestive Surgery, Strasbourg University, Strasbourg (C.B.), the Department of Digestive Surgery, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris (T.P.), the Department of Digestive Surgery, Purpan Hospital, CHU Toulouse, Université Toulouse III, Toulouse (N.C.), the Department of General Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Hôpital de la Croix-Rousse, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Equipe Mixte de Recherche 3738, Université Lyon 1, Lyon (J.-Y.M.), the Department of Digestive and General Surgery, CHU Louis Mourier, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Université Paris 7, Denis Diderot, PRES Sorbonne Paris Cité, Colombes (S.M.), the Department of Surgery and Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Ambroise Paré, AP-HP, Université de Versailles, Boulogne-Billancourt (F.P.), the Department of Digestive Surgery, CHU Nîmes, Nîmes (M.P.), and the Methodology and Quality of Life Unit in Cancer, INSERM Unité Mixte de Recherche 1098, University Hospital of Besançon, Besançon (F.B.) - all in France; and the Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College, London (S.R.M.)
| | - Denis Collet
- From the Department of Digestive and Oncologic Surgery, Claude Huriez University Hospital, and INSERM, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Lille, Unité Mixte de Recherche 1172-JPARC Jean-Pierre Aubert Research Center, Team "Mucins, epithelial differentiation, and carcinogenesis," Université de Lille, Lille (C.M., G.P.), the Epidemiology and Quality of Life Unit, INSERM Unité 1231, Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon (T.S.D.-Y.), the Department of Hepatobiliary and Digestive Surgery, CHU Rennes, University of Rennes 1, Rennes (B.M.), Université Clermont Auvergne, INSERM, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Service de Chirurgie Digestive, Clermont-Ferrand (D.P.), the Department of Digestive Surgery, Haut Lévèque University Hospital, Bordeaux (D.C.), the Department of Thoracic Surgery, Hôpital Nord, Aix-Marseille Université, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Marseille, Marseille (X.B.D.), the Department of Digestive Surgery, Strasbourg University, Strasbourg (C.B.), the Department of Digestive Surgery, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris (T.P.), the Department of Digestive Surgery, Purpan Hospital, CHU Toulouse, Université Toulouse III, Toulouse (N.C.), the Department of General Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Hôpital de la Croix-Rousse, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Equipe Mixte de Recherche 3738, Université Lyon 1, Lyon (J.-Y.M.), the Department of Digestive and General Surgery, CHU Louis Mourier, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Université Paris 7, Denis Diderot, PRES Sorbonne Paris Cité, Colombes (S.M.), the Department of Surgery and Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Ambroise Paré, AP-HP, Université de Versailles, Boulogne-Billancourt (F.P.), the Department of Digestive Surgery, CHU Nîmes, Nîmes (M.P.), and the Methodology and Quality of Life Unit in Cancer, INSERM Unité Mixte de Recherche 1098, University Hospital of Besançon, Besançon (F.B.) - all in France; and the Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College, London (S.R.M.)
| | - Xavier B D'Journo
- From the Department of Digestive and Oncologic Surgery, Claude Huriez University Hospital, and INSERM, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Lille, Unité Mixte de Recherche 1172-JPARC Jean-Pierre Aubert Research Center, Team "Mucins, epithelial differentiation, and carcinogenesis," Université de Lille, Lille (C.M., G.P.), the Epidemiology and Quality of Life Unit, INSERM Unité 1231, Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon (T.S.D.-Y.), the Department of Hepatobiliary and Digestive Surgery, CHU Rennes, University of Rennes 1, Rennes (B.M.), Université Clermont Auvergne, INSERM, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Service de Chirurgie Digestive, Clermont-Ferrand (D.P.), the Department of Digestive Surgery, Haut Lévèque University Hospital, Bordeaux (D.C.), the Department of Thoracic Surgery, Hôpital Nord, Aix-Marseille Université, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Marseille, Marseille (X.B.D.), the Department of Digestive Surgery, Strasbourg University, Strasbourg (C.B.), the Department of Digestive Surgery, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris (T.P.), the Department of Digestive Surgery, Purpan Hospital, CHU Toulouse, Université Toulouse III, Toulouse (N.C.), the Department of General Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Hôpital de la Croix-Rousse, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Equipe Mixte de Recherche 3738, Université Lyon 1, Lyon (J.-Y.M.), the Department of Digestive and General Surgery, CHU Louis Mourier, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Université Paris 7, Denis Diderot, PRES Sorbonne Paris Cité, Colombes (S.M.), the Department of Surgery and Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Ambroise Paré, AP-HP, Université de Versailles, Boulogne-Billancourt (F.P.), the Department of Digestive Surgery, CHU Nîmes, Nîmes (M.P.), and the Methodology and Quality of Life Unit in Cancer, INSERM Unité Mixte de Recherche 1098, University Hospital of Besançon, Besançon (F.B.) - all in France; and the Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College, London (S.R.M.)
| | - Cécile Brigand
- From the Department of Digestive and Oncologic Surgery, Claude Huriez University Hospital, and INSERM, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Lille, Unité Mixte de Recherche 1172-JPARC Jean-Pierre Aubert Research Center, Team "Mucins, epithelial differentiation, and carcinogenesis," Université de Lille, Lille (C.M., G.P.), the Epidemiology and Quality of Life Unit, INSERM Unité 1231, Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon (T.S.D.-Y.), the Department of Hepatobiliary and Digestive Surgery, CHU Rennes, University of Rennes 1, Rennes (B.M.), Université Clermont Auvergne, INSERM, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Service de Chirurgie Digestive, Clermont-Ferrand (D.P.), the Department of Digestive Surgery, Haut Lévèque University Hospital, Bordeaux (D.C.), the Department of Thoracic Surgery, Hôpital Nord, Aix-Marseille Université, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Marseille, Marseille (X.B.D.), the Department of Digestive Surgery, Strasbourg University, Strasbourg (C.B.), the Department of Digestive Surgery, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris (T.P.), the Department of Digestive Surgery, Purpan Hospital, CHU Toulouse, Université Toulouse III, Toulouse (N.C.), the Department of General Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Hôpital de la Croix-Rousse, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Equipe Mixte de Recherche 3738, Université Lyon 1, Lyon (J.-Y.M.), the Department of Digestive and General Surgery, CHU Louis Mourier, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Université Paris 7, Denis Diderot, PRES Sorbonne Paris Cité, Colombes (S.M.), the Department of Surgery and Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Ambroise Paré, AP-HP, Université de Versailles, Boulogne-Billancourt (F.P.), the Department of Digestive Surgery, CHU Nîmes, Nîmes (M.P.), and the Methodology and Quality of Life Unit in Cancer, INSERM Unité Mixte de Recherche 1098, University Hospital of Besançon, Besançon (F.B.) - all in France; and the Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College, London (S.R.M.)
| | - Thierry Perniceni
- From the Department of Digestive and Oncologic Surgery, Claude Huriez University Hospital, and INSERM, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Lille, Unité Mixte de Recherche 1172-JPARC Jean-Pierre Aubert Research Center, Team "Mucins, epithelial differentiation, and carcinogenesis," Université de Lille, Lille (C.M., G.P.), the Epidemiology and Quality of Life Unit, INSERM Unité 1231, Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon (T.S.D.-Y.), the Department of Hepatobiliary and Digestive Surgery, CHU Rennes, University of Rennes 1, Rennes (B.M.), Université Clermont Auvergne, INSERM, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Service de Chirurgie Digestive, Clermont-Ferrand (D.P.), the Department of Digestive Surgery, Haut Lévèque University Hospital, Bordeaux (D.C.), the Department of Thoracic Surgery, Hôpital Nord, Aix-Marseille Université, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Marseille, Marseille (X.B.D.), the Department of Digestive Surgery, Strasbourg University, Strasbourg (C.B.), the Department of Digestive Surgery, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris (T.P.), the Department of Digestive Surgery, Purpan Hospital, CHU Toulouse, Université Toulouse III, Toulouse (N.C.), the Department of General Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Hôpital de la Croix-Rousse, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Equipe Mixte de Recherche 3738, Université Lyon 1, Lyon (J.-Y.M.), the Department of Digestive and General Surgery, CHU Louis Mourier, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Université Paris 7, Denis Diderot, PRES Sorbonne Paris Cité, Colombes (S.M.), the Department of Surgery and Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Ambroise Paré, AP-HP, Université de Versailles, Boulogne-Billancourt (F.P.), the Department of Digestive Surgery, CHU Nîmes, Nîmes (M.P.), and the Methodology and Quality of Life Unit in Cancer, INSERM Unité Mixte de Recherche 1098, University Hospital of Besançon, Besançon (F.B.) - all in France; and the Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College, London (S.R.M.)
| | - Nicolas Carrère
- From the Department of Digestive and Oncologic Surgery, Claude Huriez University Hospital, and INSERM, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Lille, Unité Mixte de Recherche 1172-JPARC Jean-Pierre Aubert Research Center, Team "Mucins, epithelial differentiation, and carcinogenesis," Université de Lille, Lille (C.M., G.P.), the Epidemiology and Quality of Life Unit, INSERM Unité 1231, Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon (T.S.D.-Y.), the Department of Hepatobiliary and Digestive Surgery, CHU Rennes, University of Rennes 1, Rennes (B.M.), Université Clermont Auvergne, INSERM, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Service de Chirurgie Digestive, Clermont-Ferrand (D.P.), the Department of Digestive Surgery, Haut Lévèque University Hospital, Bordeaux (D.C.), the Department of Thoracic Surgery, Hôpital Nord, Aix-Marseille Université, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Marseille, Marseille (X.B.D.), the Department of Digestive Surgery, Strasbourg University, Strasbourg (C.B.), the Department of Digestive Surgery, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris (T.P.), the Department of Digestive Surgery, Purpan Hospital, CHU Toulouse, Université Toulouse III, Toulouse (N.C.), the Department of General Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Hôpital de la Croix-Rousse, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Equipe Mixte de Recherche 3738, Université Lyon 1, Lyon (J.-Y.M.), the Department of Digestive and General Surgery, CHU Louis Mourier, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Université Paris 7, Denis Diderot, PRES Sorbonne Paris Cité, Colombes (S.M.), the Department of Surgery and Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Ambroise Paré, AP-HP, Université de Versailles, Boulogne-Billancourt (F.P.), the Department of Digestive Surgery, CHU Nîmes, Nîmes (M.P.), and the Methodology and Quality of Life Unit in Cancer, INSERM Unité Mixte de Recherche 1098, University Hospital of Besançon, Besançon (F.B.) - all in France; and the Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College, London (S.R.M.)
| | - Jean-Yves Mabrut
- From the Department of Digestive and Oncologic Surgery, Claude Huriez University Hospital, and INSERM, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Lille, Unité Mixte de Recherche 1172-JPARC Jean-Pierre Aubert Research Center, Team "Mucins, epithelial differentiation, and carcinogenesis," Université de Lille, Lille (C.M., G.P.), the Epidemiology and Quality of Life Unit, INSERM Unité 1231, Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon (T.S.D.-Y.), the Department of Hepatobiliary and Digestive Surgery, CHU Rennes, University of Rennes 1, Rennes (B.M.), Université Clermont Auvergne, INSERM, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Service de Chirurgie Digestive, Clermont-Ferrand (D.P.), the Department of Digestive Surgery, Haut Lévèque University Hospital, Bordeaux (D.C.), the Department of Thoracic Surgery, Hôpital Nord, Aix-Marseille Université, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Marseille, Marseille (X.B.D.), the Department of Digestive Surgery, Strasbourg University, Strasbourg (C.B.), the Department of Digestive Surgery, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris (T.P.), the Department of Digestive Surgery, Purpan Hospital, CHU Toulouse, Université Toulouse III, Toulouse (N.C.), the Department of General Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Hôpital de la Croix-Rousse, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Equipe Mixte de Recherche 3738, Université Lyon 1, Lyon (J.-Y.M.), the Department of Digestive and General Surgery, CHU Louis Mourier, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Université Paris 7, Denis Diderot, PRES Sorbonne Paris Cité, Colombes (S.M.), the Department of Surgery and Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Ambroise Paré, AP-HP, Université de Versailles, Boulogne-Billancourt (F.P.), the Department of Digestive Surgery, CHU Nîmes, Nîmes (M.P.), and the Methodology and Quality of Life Unit in Cancer, INSERM Unité Mixte de Recherche 1098, University Hospital of Besançon, Besançon (F.B.) - all in France; and the Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College, London (S.R.M.)
| | - Simon Msika
- From the Department of Digestive and Oncologic Surgery, Claude Huriez University Hospital, and INSERM, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Lille, Unité Mixte de Recherche 1172-JPARC Jean-Pierre Aubert Research Center, Team "Mucins, epithelial differentiation, and carcinogenesis," Université de Lille, Lille (C.M., G.P.), the Epidemiology and Quality of Life Unit, INSERM Unité 1231, Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon (T.S.D.-Y.), the Department of Hepatobiliary and Digestive Surgery, CHU Rennes, University of Rennes 1, Rennes (B.M.), Université Clermont Auvergne, INSERM, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Service de Chirurgie Digestive, Clermont-Ferrand (D.P.), the Department of Digestive Surgery, Haut Lévèque University Hospital, Bordeaux (D.C.), the Department of Thoracic Surgery, Hôpital Nord, Aix-Marseille Université, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Marseille, Marseille (X.B.D.), the Department of Digestive Surgery, Strasbourg University, Strasbourg (C.B.), the Department of Digestive Surgery, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris (T.P.), the Department of Digestive Surgery, Purpan Hospital, CHU Toulouse, Université Toulouse III, Toulouse (N.C.), the Department of General Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Hôpital de la Croix-Rousse, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Equipe Mixte de Recherche 3738, Université Lyon 1, Lyon (J.-Y.M.), the Department of Digestive and General Surgery, CHU Louis Mourier, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Université Paris 7, Denis Diderot, PRES Sorbonne Paris Cité, Colombes (S.M.), the Department of Surgery and Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Ambroise Paré, AP-HP, Université de Versailles, Boulogne-Billancourt (F.P.), the Department of Digestive Surgery, CHU Nîmes, Nîmes (M.P.), and the Methodology and Quality of Life Unit in Cancer, INSERM Unité Mixte de Recherche 1098, University Hospital of Besançon, Besançon (F.B.) - all in France; and the Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College, London (S.R.M.)
| | - Frédérique Peschaud
- From the Department of Digestive and Oncologic Surgery, Claude Huriez University Hospital, and INSERM, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Lille, Unité Mixte de Recherche 1172-JPARC Jean-Pierre Aubert Research Center, Team "Mucins, epithelial differentiation, and carcinogenesis," Université de Lille, Lille (C.M., G.P.), the Epidemiology and Quality of Life Unit, INSERM Unité 1231, Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon (T.S.D.-Y.), the Department of Hepatobiliary and Digestive Surgery, CHU Rennes, University of Rennes 1, Rennes (B.M.), Université Clermont Auvergne, INSERM, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Service de Chirurgie Digestive, Clermont-Ferrand (D.P.), the Department of Digestive Surgery, Haut Lévèque University Hospital, Bordeaux (D.C.), the Department of Thoracic Surgery, Hôpital Nord, Aix-Marseille Université, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Marseille, Marseille (X.B.D.), the Department of Digestive Surgery, Strasbourg University, Strasbourg (C.B.), the Department of Digestive Surgery, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris (T.P.), the Department of Digestive Surgery, Purpan Hospital, CHU Toulouse, Université Toulouse III, Toulouse (N.C.), the Department of General Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Hôpital de la Croix-Rousse, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Equipe Mixte de Recherche 3738, Université Lyon 1, Lyon (J.-Y.M.), the Department of Digestive and General Surgery, CHU Louis Mourier, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Université Paris 7, Denis Diderot, PRES Sorbonne Paris Cité, Colombes (S.M.), the Department of Surgery and Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Ambroise Paré, AP-HP, Université de Versailles, Boulogne-Billancourt (F.P.), the Department of Digestive Surgery, CHU Nîmes, Nîmes (M.P.), and the Methodology and Quality of Life Unit in Cancer, INSERM Unité Mixte de Recherche 1098, University Hospital of Besançon, Besançon (F.B.) - all in France; and the Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College, London (S.R.M.)
| | - Michel Prudhomme
- From the Department of Digestive and Oncologic Surgery, Claude Huriez University Hospital, and INSERM, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Lille, Unité Mixte de Recherche 1172-JPARC Jean-Pierre Aubert Research Center, Team "Mucins, epithelial differentiation, and carcinogenesis," Université de Lille, Lille (C.M., G.P.), the Epidemiology and Quality of Life Unit, INSERM Unité 1231, Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon (T.S.D.-Y.), the Department of Hepatobiliary and Digestive Surgery, CHU Rennes, University of Rennes 1, Rennes (B.M.), Université Clermont Auvergne, INSERM, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Service de Chirurgie Digestive, Clermont-Ferrand (D.P.), the Department of Digestive Surgery, Haut Lévèque University Hospital, Bordeaux (D.C.), the Department of Thoracic Surgery, Hôpital Nord, Aix-Marseille Université, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Marseille, Marseille (X.B.D.), the Department of Digestive Surgery, Strasbourg University, Strasbourg (C.B.), the Department of Digestive Surgery, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris (T.P.), the Department of Digestive Surgery, Purpan Hospital, CHU Toulouse, Université Toulouse III, Toulouse (N.C.), the Department of General Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Hôpital de la Croix-Rousse, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Equipe Mixte de Recherche 3738, Université Lyon 1, Lyon (J.-Y.M.), the Department of Digestive and General Surgery, CHU Louis Mourier, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Université Paris 7, Denis Diderot, PRES Sorbonne Paris Cité, Colombes (S.M.), the Department of Surgery and Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Ambroise Paré, AP-HP, Université de Versailles, Boulogne-Billancourt (F.P.), the Department of Digestive Surgery, CHU Nîmes, Nîmes (M.P.), and the Methodology and Quality of Life Unit in Cancer, INSERM Unité Mixte de Recherche 1098, University Hospital of Besançon, Besançon (F.B.) - all in France; and the Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College, London (S.R.M.)
| | - Franck Bonnetain
- From the Department of Digestive and Oncologic Surgery, Claude Huriez University Hospital, and INSERM, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Lille, Unité Mixte de Recherche 1172-JPARC Jean-Pierre Aubert Research Center, Team "Mucins, epithelial differentiation, and carcinogenesis," Université de Lille, Lille (C.M., G.P.), the Epidemiology and Quality of Life Unit, INSERM Unité 1231, Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon (T.S.D.-Y.), the Department of Hepatobiliary and Digestive Surgery, CHU Rennes, University of Rennes 1, Rennes (B.M.), Université Clermont Auvergne, INSERM, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Service de Chirurgie Digestive, Clermont-Ferrand (D.P.), the Department of Digestive Surgery, Haut Lévèque University Hospital, Bordeaux (D.C.), the Department of Thoracic Surgery, Hôpital Nord, Aix-Marseille Université, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Marseille, Marseille (X.B.D.), the Department of Digestive Surgery, Strasbourg University, Strasbourg (C.B.), the Department of Digestive Surgery, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris (T.P.), the Department of Digestive Surgery, Purpan Hospital, CHU Toulouse, Université Toulouse III, Toulouse (N.C.), the Department of General Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Hôpital de la Croix-Rousse, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Equipe Mixte de Recherche 3738, Université Lyon 1, Lyon (J.-Y.M.), the Department of Digestive and General Surgery, CHU Louis Mourier, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Université Paris 7, Denis Diderot, PRES Sorbonne Paris Cité, Colombes (S.M.), the Department of Surgery and Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Ambroise Paré, AP-HP, Université de Versailles, Boulogne-Billancourt (F.P.), the Department of Digestive Surgery, CHU Nîmes, Nîmes (M.P.), and the Methodology and Quality of Life Unit in Cancer, INSERM Unité Mixte de Recherche 1098, University Hospital of Besançon, Besançon (F.B.) - all in France; and the Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College, London (S.R.M.)
| | - Guillaume Piessen
- From the Department of Digestive and Oncologic Surgery, Claude Huriez University Hospital, and INSERM, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Lille, Unité Mixte de Recherche 1172-JPARC Jean-Pierre Aubert Research Center, Team "Mucins, epithelial differentiation, and carcinogenesis," Université de Lille, Lille (C.M., G.P.), the Epidemiology and Quality of Life Unit, INSERM Unité 1231, Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon (T.S.D.-Y.), the Department of Hepatobiliary and Digestive Surgery, CHU Rennes, University of Rennes 1, Rennes (B.M.), Université Clermont Auvergne, INSERM, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Service de Chirurgie Digestive, Clermont-Ferrand (D.P.), the Department of Digestive Surgery, Haut Lévèque University Hospital, Bordeaux (D.C.), the Department of Thoracic Surgery, Hôpital Nord, Aix-Marseille Université, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Marseille, Marseille (X.B.D.), the Department of Digestive Surgery, Strasbourg University, Strasbourg (C.B.), the Department of Digestive Surgery, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris (T.P.), the Department of Digestive Surgery, Purpan Hospital, CHU Toulouse, Université Toulouse III, Toulouse (N.C.), the Department of General Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Hôpital de la Croix-Rousse, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Equipe Mixte de Recherche 3738, Université Lyon 1, Lyon (J.-Y.M.), the Department of Digestive and General Surgery, CHU Louis Mourier, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Université Paris 7, Denis Diderot, PRES Sorbonne Paris Cité, Colombes (S.M.), the Department of Surgery and Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Ambroise Paré, AP-HP, Université de Versailles, Boulogne-Billancourt (F.P.), the Department of Digestive Surgery, CHU Nîmes, Nîmes (M.P.), and the Methodology and Quality of Life Unit in Cancer, INSERM Unité Mixte de Recherche 1098, University Hospital of Besançon, Besançon (F.B.) - all in France; and the Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College, London (S.R.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Wang Z, Li M, Xu Z, Jiang Y, Gu H, Yu Y, Zhu H, Zhang H, Lu P, Xin J, Xu H, Liu C. Improvements to the gastric cancer tumor-node-metastasis staging system based on computer-aided unsupervised clustering. BMC Cancer 2018; 18:706. [PMID: 29970022 PMCID: PMC6029135 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-018-4623-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2018] [Accepted: 06/20/2018] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The Union for International Cancer Control (UICC) tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) classification is a key gastric cancer prognosis system. This study aimed to create a new TNM system to provide a reference for the clinical diagnosis and treatment of gastric cancer. Methods A review of gastric cancer patients’ records was conducted in The First Hospital of China Medical University and the Liaoning Cancer Hospital and Institute. Based on patients’ prognoses data, computer-aided unsupervised clustering was performed for all possible TNM staging situations to create a new staging division system. Results The primary outcome measure was 5-year survival, analyzed according to TNM classifications. Computer-aided unsupervised clustering for all TNM staging situations was used to create TNM division criteria that were more consistent with clinical situations. Furthermore, unsupervised clustering for the number of lymph node metastasis in the N stage led to the formulation of a classification method that differs from the existing N stage criteria, and unsupervised clustering for tumor size provided an additional reference for prognosis estimates. Conclusions Finally, we developed a TNM staging system based on the computer-aided unsupervised clustering method; this system was more in line with clinical prognosis data when compared with the 7th edition of UICC gastric cancer TNM classification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhiqiong Wang
- Sino-Dutch Biomedical and Information Engineering School, Northeastern University, Shenyang, 110169, China
| | - Mo Li
- Sino-Dutch Biomedical and Information Engineering School, Northeastern University, Shenyang, 110169, China
| | - Zhen Xu
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Section Surgical Research, University Clinic Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 365, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Yanlin Jiang
- Department of Breast and Thyroid Surgery, Affiliated Zhongshan Hospital of Dalian University, Dalian, 116001, China
| | - Huizi Gu
- Department of Internal Neurology, the Second Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, 116027, China
| | - Ying Yu
- Liaoning Medical Device Test Institute, Shenyang, 110179, China
| | - Haitao Zhu
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Liaoning Cancer Hospital and Institute, Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, 110042, China
| | - Hao Zhang
- Department of Breast Surgery, Liaoning Cancer Hospital and Institute, Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, No. 44, Xiaoheyan Road, Dadong District, Shenyang, 110042, Liaoning Province, China.
| | - Ping Lu
- Department of Surgical Oncology, the first hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, 110001, China
| | - Junchang Xin
- School of Computer Science and Engineering, Northeastern University, Shenyang, 110189, China.
| | - Hong Xu
- Department of Breast Surgery, Liaoning Cancer Hospital and Institute, Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, No. 44, Xiaoheyan Road, Dadong District, Shenyang, 110042, Liaoning Province, China.
| | - Caigang Liu
- Department of Breast Surgery, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, 110004, China.
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Bencivenga M, Verlato G, Mengardo V, Weindelmayer J, Allum WH. Do all the European surgeons perform the same D2? The need of D2 audit in Europe. Updates Surg 2018; 70:189-195. [PMID: 29869322 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-018-0542-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2018] [Accepted: 05/13/2018] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
Although D2 lymphadenectomy is the standard of care for radical intent surgical treatment of gastric cancer, the real compliance with D2 dissection in Europe is still unknown. The aim of the present study is to analyze the variation in lymph-node harvesting reported after D2 dissection in European series and to present a European project aiming at evaluating the real compliance with D2 lymphadenectomy. A PubMed search for papers using the key words "D2 lymphadenectomy" and "gastric cancer" from 2008 to 2017 was undertaken. Only studies by European authors in English language reporting the number of retrieved lymph nodes after D2 lymphadenectomy were included. The results of literature review were descriptively reported. The literature survey yielded 16 studies: 2 RCTs, 3 observational multicentre studies, and 11 observational monocentric studies. A large variability was found in the number of retrieved nodes, which, overall, was the lowest in the surgical series from Eastern Europe (16.6 and 19.9 in the Lithuanian and Hungarian series, respectively) and the highest in an Italian RCT. The within-study variability was also quite high, especially in multicentre RCTs and observational studies. Sample size tended to have a larger effect on the variability of lymph nodes retrieved than on its actual value. However, in both cases, the relation was not significant, due to the low number of studies considered. There is a large variability in the number of retrieved nodes after D2 dissection in European series. This reflects, at least partly, different approaches to D2 lymphadenectomy by European surgeons and may be responsible of the different outcomes observed in patients with gastric cancer across Europe. Therefore, there is the need to standardize the practice of D2 gastrectomy in Europe and to define possible variations of D2 procedures according to tumour's characteristics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Bencivenga
- General and Upper GI Surgery Division, University of Verona, Piazzale Aristide Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy.
| | - Giuseppe Verlato
- Unit of Epidemiology and Medical Statistics, Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Valentina Mengardo
- General and Upper GI Surgery Division, University of Verona, Piazzale Aristide Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Jacopo Weindelmayer
- General and Upper GI Surgery Division, University of Verona, Piazzale Aristide Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - William H Allum
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
EAES classification of intraoperative adverse events in laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 2018; 32:3822-3829. [PMID: 29435754 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-018-6108-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2018] [Accepted: 02/07/2018] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Surgical outcomes are traditionally evaluated by post-operative data such as histopathology and morbidity. Although these outcomes are reported using accepted systems, their ability to influence operative performance is limited by their retrospective application. Interest in direct measurement of intraoperative events is growing but no available systems applicable to routine practice exist. We aimed to develop a structured, practical method to report intraoperative adverse events enacted during minimal access surgical procedures. METHODS A structured mixed methodology approach was adopted. Current intraoperative adverse event reporting practices and desirable system characteristics were sought through a survey of the EAES executive. The observational clinical human reliability analysis method was applied to a series of laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (TME) case videos to identify intraoperative adverse events. In keeping with survey results, observed events were further categorised into non-consequential and consequential, which were further subdivided into four levels based upon the principle of therapy required to correct the event. A second survey phase explored usability, acceptability, face and content validity of the novel classification. RESULTS 217 h of TME surgery were analysed to develop and continually refine the five-point hierarchical structure. 34 EAES expert surgeons (69%) responded. The lack of an accepted system was the main barrier to routine reporting. Simplicity, reproducibility and clinical utility were identified as essential requirements. The observed distribution of intraoperative adverse events was 60.1% grade I (non-consequential), 37.1% grade II (minor corrective action), 2.4% grade III (major correction or change in post-operative care) and 0.1% grade IV (life threatening). 84% agreed with the proposed classification (Likert scale 4.04) and 92% felt it was applicable to their practice and incorporated all desirable characteristics. CONCLUSION A clinically applicable intraoperative adverse event classification, which is acceptable to expert surgeons, is reported and complements the objective assessment of minimal access surgical performance.
Collapse
|
39
|
Kauppila JH, Wahlin K, Lagergren P, Lagergren J. Neoadjuvant therapy in relation to lymphadenectomy and resection margins during surgery for oesophageal cancer. Sci Rep 2018; 8:446. [PMID: 29323261 PMCID: PMC5765051 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-18879-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2017] [Accepted: 12/18/2017] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Differences in lymph node yield and tumour-involved resection margins comparing neoadjuvant therapy plus surgery with surgery alone for oesophageal cancer are unclear. Patients who underwent oesophageal cancer surgery in Sweden in 1987–2010 were included. Patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy were compared with those who underwent surgery alone. Outcomes were the number of examined lymph nodes (main outcome), number metastatic lymph nodes, and resection margin status. Rate ratios (RRs) and 95% CIs of lymph node yield were calculated by Poisson regression, and odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs of resection margin status by multivariable logistic regression, both adjusted for confounders. Among 1818 patients, 587 (32%) had received neoadjuvant therapy and 1231 (68%) had not. Lymph node yield was lower in the neoadjuvant therapy group (median 6 versus 8; adjusted RR 0.75, 0.73–0.78). Fewer metastatic nodes were identified following neoadjuvant therapy (median 0 versus 1; adjusted RR 0.76, 0.69–0.84). Neoadjuvant therapy associated to decreased risk of tumour-involved resection margins when adjusted for confounders except T-stage (OR 0.52, 0.38–0.70), but the association did not remain after adjustment for T-stage (OR 0.91, 0.64–1.29). Neoadjuvant therapy seems to decrease the lymph node yield and decrease the risk of tumour-involved resection margins by shrinking primary tumour.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joonas H Kauppila
- Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Molecular medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, 17176, Stockholm, Sweden. .,Cancer and Translational Medicine Research Unit, Medical Research Center, University of Oulu and Oulu University Hospital, 90014, Oulu, Finland.
| | - Karl Wahlin
- Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Molecular medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, 17176, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Pernilla Lagergren
- Surgical Care Science, Department of Molecular medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, 17176, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Jesper Lagergren
- Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Molecular medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, 17176, Stockholm, Sweden.,Division of Cancer Studies, King's College London and Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, England
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Markar SR, Noordman BJ, Mackenzie H, Findlay JM, Boshier PR, Ni M, Steyerberg EW, van der Gaast A, Hulshof MCCM, Maynard N, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Wijnhoven BPL, Reynolds JV, Van Lanschot JJB, Hanna GB. Multimodality treatment for esophageal adenocarcinoma: multi-center propensity-score matched study. Ann Oncol 2017; 28:519-527. [PMID: 28039180 PMCID: PMC5391716 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdw560] [Citation(s) in RCA: 59] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The primary aim of this study was to compare survival from neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus surgery (NCRS) versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus surgery (NCS) for the treatment of esophageal or junctional adenocarcinoma. The secondary aims were to compare pathological effects, short-term mortality and morbidity, and to evaluate the effect of lymph node harvest upon survival in both treatment groups. Methods Data were collected from 10 European centers from 2001 to 2012. Six hundred and eight patients with stage II or III oesophageal or oesophago-gastric junctional adenocarcinoma were included; 301 in the NCRS group and 307 in the NCS group. Propensity score matching and Cox regression analyses were used to compensate for differences in baseline characteristics. Results NCRS resulted in significant pathological benefits with more ypT0 (26.7% versus 5%; P < 0.001), more ypN0 (63.3% versus 32.1%; P < 0.001), and reduced R1/2 resection margins (7.7% versus 21.8%; P < 0.001). Analysis of short-term outcomes showed no statistically significant differences in 30-day or 90-day mortality, but increased incidence of anastomotic leak (23.1% versus 6.8%; P < 0.001) in NCRS patients. There were no statistically significant differences between the groups in 3-year overall survival (57.9% versus 53.4%; Hazard Ratio (HR)= 0.89, 95%C.I. 0.67-1.17, P = 0.391) nor disease-free survival (52.9% versus 48.9%; HR = 0.90, 95%C.I. 0.69-1.18, P = 0.443). The pattern of recurrence was also similar (P = 0.660). There was a higher lymph node harvest in the NCS group (27 versus 14; P < 0.001), which was significantly associated with a lower recurrence rate and improved disease free survival within the NCS group. Conclusion The survival differences between NCRS and NCS maybe modest, if present at all, for the treatment of locally advanced esophageal or junctional adenocarcinoma. Future large-scale randomized trials must control and monitor indicators of the quality of surgery, as the extent of lymphadenectomy appears to influence prognosis in patients treated with NCS, from this large multi-center European study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S R Markar
- Department of Surgery & Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - B J Noordman
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC-University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - H Mackenzie
- Department of Surgery & Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - J M Findlay
- Oxford Oesophagogastric Centre, Oxford University Hospitals, Oxford, UK
| | - P R Boshier
- Department of Surgery & Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - M Ni
- Department of Surgery & Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - E W Steyerberg
- Centre for Medical Decision Sciences, Department of Public Health
| | - A van der Gaast
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC-University Medical Centre, Rotterdam
| | - M C C M Hulshof
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam
| | - N Maynard
- Oxford Oesophagogastric Centre, Oxford University Hospitals, Oxford, UK
| | | | - B P L Wijnhoven
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC-University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - J V Reynolds
- Department of Surgery, Trinity College Dublin and St James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - J J B Van Lanschot
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC-University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - G B Hanna
- Department of Surgery & Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Abstract
Oesophageal cancer is a clinically challenging disease that requires a multidisciplinary approach. Extensive treatment might be associated with a considerable decline in health-related quality of life and yet still a poor prognosis. In recent decades, prognosis has gradually improved in many countries. Endoscopic procedures have increasingly been used in the treatment of premalignant and early oesophageal tumours. Neoadjuvant therapy with chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy has supplemented surgery as standard treatment of locally advanced oesophageal cancer. Surgery has become more standardised and centralised. Several therapeutic alternatives are available for palliative treatment. This Seminar aims to provide insights into the current clinical management, ongoing controversies, and future needs in oesophageal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jesper Lagergren
- Division of Cancer Studies, King's College London, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
| | - Elizabeth Smyth
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - David Cunningham
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Pernilla Lagergren
- Surgical Care Science, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Chen D, Wang K, Li X, Jiang M, Ni L, Xu B, Chu Y, Wang W, Wang H, Kang H, Wu K, Liang J, Ren G. FOXK1 plays an oncogenic role in the development of esophageal cancer. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2017; 494:88-94. [PMID: 29050933 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2017.10.080] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2017] [Accepted: 10/15/2017] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
Forkhead box k1 (FOXK1) is a member of the FOX class of transcription factors and it is dysregulated in many solid tumors including hepatocellular carcinoma, gastric cancer, colorectal cancer and prostate cancer. However, the expression status of FOXK1 and its clinical significance in esophageal cancer (EC) is still uncertain. Our study aimed at investigating the significance of FOXK1 expression in human EC and its biological function in the development of EC. We found that FOXK1 was overexpressed in EC tissues compared with corresponding non-tumor tissues using immunohistochemistry. And high FOXK1 expression was related to poor differentiation of EC. The Kaplan-Meier curve indicated that high FOXK1 expression may result in poor prognosis of EC patients. Furthermore, overexpression of FOXK1 in EC9706 cell inhibited cell apoptosis and promoted cell proliferation and migration, and suppression of FOXK1 in EC109 cell obtained reverse results. Our data suggest that FOXK1 plays an oncogenic role in EC pathogenesis and can serve as a therapeutic target for patients with EC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Di Chen
- State Key Laboratory of Cancer Biology and Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases, The Fourth Military Medical University, 127 Changle Western Road, Xi'an, Shaanxi Province, 710032, China
| | - Kai Wang
- Department of Gastroenterology, The 16th Hospital of the People's Liberation Army of China, 219 Tuanjie South Road, A Letai, Xinjiang Province, 836599, China
| | - Xiaowei Li
- State Key Laboratory of Cancer Biology and Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases, The Fourth Military Medical University, 127 Changle Western Road, Xi'an, Shaanxi Province, 710032, China
| | - Mingzuo Jiang
- State Key Laboratory of Cancer Biology and Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases, The Fourth Military Medical University, 127 Changle Western Road, Xi'an, Shaanxi Province, 710032, China
| | - Lu Ni
- Department of Gastroenterology, The 16th Hospital of the People's Liberation Army of China, 219 Tuanjie South Road, A Letai, Xinjiang Province, 836599, China
| | - Bing Xu
- State Key Laboratory of Cancer Biology and Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases, The Fourth Military Medical University, 127 Changle Western Road, Xi'an, Shaanxi Province, 710032, China
| | - Yi Chu
- State Key Laboratory of Cancer Biology and Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases, The Fourth Military Medical University, 127 Changle Western Road, Xi'an, Shaanxi Province, 710032, China
| | - Weijie Wang
- State Key Laboratory of Cancer Biology and Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases, The Fourth Military Medical University, 127 Changle Western Road, Xi'an, Shaanxi Province, 710032, China
| | - Hua Wang
- State Key Laboratory of Cancer Biology and Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases, The Fourth Military Medical University, 127 Changle Western Road, Xi'an, Shaanxi Province, 710032, China
| | - Huijie Kang
- State Key Laboratory of Cancer Biology and Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases, The Fourth Military Medical University, 127 Changle Western Road, Xi'an, Shaanxi Province, 710032, China
| | - Kaichun Wu
- State Key Laboratory of Cancer Biology and Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases, The Fourth Military Medical University, 127 Changle Western Road, Xi'an, Shaanxi Province, 710032, China
| | - Jie Liang
- State Key Laboratory of Cancer Biology and Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases, The Fourth Military Medical University, 127 Changle Western Road, Xi'an, Shaanxi Province, 710032, China.
| | - Gui Ren
- State Key Laboratory of Cancer Biology and Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases, The Fourth Military Medical University, 127 Changle Western Road, Xi'an, Shaanxi Province, 710032, China.
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Yi L, Lv Z, Wang J, Zhong X. Bcl‑2 associated athanogene 4 promotes proliferation, migration and invasion of gastric cancer cells. Mol Med Rep 2017; 16:3753-3760. [PMID: 29067445 PMCID: PMC5646952 DOI: 10.3892/mmr.2017.7073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2016] [Accepted: 04/04/2017] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Currently, with the increase of morbidity and mortality rate, gastric cancer (GC) is attracting increasing attention in China. Bcl-2-associated athanogene 4 (BAG4) has been identified as a tumor promoter in several tumors, but its role in GC remains unknown. The present study aimed to detect the expression of BAG4 and determine its function in the progression of GC. The results from reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction and western blotting revealed that BAG4 was markedly upregulated in highly metastatic cell lines (SGC7901 and MGC803), compared with the lower-metastatic cell lines (AGS and BGC823). Through Cell Counting Kit-8, cell cycle, apoptosis, Transwell and colony formation assays, BAG4 was demonstrated to promote the proliferation, migration and invasion of GC cells in vitro. Additionally, in vivo assays further certified that BAG4 can increase the proliferation and invasion of GC cells. In conclusion, these findings implicate BAG4 as a potential therapeutic target for GC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lizhi Yi
- Department of Gastroenterology, Leshan People's Hospital, Leshan, Sichuan 614000, P.R. China
| | - Zhenbing Lv
- Department of General Surgery Two, Nanchong Central Hospital, Nanchong, Sichuan 637000, P.R. China
| | - Jianmei Wang
- Department of Pathology, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, Sichuan 646000, P.R. China
| | - Xianfei Zhong
- Department of Gastroenterology, Leshan People's Hospital, Leshan, Sichuan 614000, P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Song G, Zhang H, Chen C, Gong L, Chen B, Zhao S, Shi J, Xu J, Ye Z. miR-551b regulates epithelial-mesenchymal transition and metastasis of gastric cancer by inhibiting ERBB4 expression. Oncotarget 2017; 8:45725-45735. [PMID: 28501849 PMCID: PMC5542221 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.17392] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2016] [Accepted: 04/02/2017] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) is an important biological process that is characteristic of malignant tumor cells with metastatic potential. We investigated the role of miR-551b in EMT and metastasis in gastric cancer (GC). We found that low miR-551b levels were associated with EMT, metastasis and a poor prognosis in GC patients. Further, two GC cell lines, MNK45 and SGC7901, exhibited lower miR-551b levels than the GES normal stomach cell line. Exposing MNK45 and SGC7901 cells to TGF-β1 resulted in cell morphology changes characteristic of EMT, which was confirmed by Western blot analysis demonstrating low E-Cadherin and high N-Cadherin and Vimentin levels. Treatment with miR-551b mimics inhibited these EMT changes as well as Transwell migration and invasiveness. We identified ERBB4 as a potential target of miR-551b based on patient data from the TCGA. ERBB4 was upregulated in GC specimens, and its high expression correlated with a poor prognosis of GC patients. Dual luciferase assays revealed that miR-551b directly inhibited ERBB4 by binding to its 3'UTR. Moreover, treatment with miR-551b mimics or the ERBB4 inhibitor AST-1306 inhibited EMT in the GC cell lines. Finally, nude mice xenografted with GC cancer cell lines expressing miR-551b mimics exhibited smaller tumors and longer survival than mice engrafted with control GC cancer cells. These data indicate that miR-551b inhibits EMT and metastasis in GC by inhibiting ERBB4. miR-551b and ERBB4 are thus potential therapeutic targets for the treatment of GC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guangyuan Song
- The Second Clinical Medical College, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Hongcheng Zhang
- The Second Clinical Medical College, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Chenlin Chen
- The Second Clinical Medical College, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Lijie Gong
- The Second Clinical Medical College, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Biao Chen
- The Second Clinical Medical College, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Shaoyun Zhao
- The Second Clinical Medical College, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Ji Shi
- The First Clinical Medical College, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Ji Xu
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Pancreatic Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Key Laboratory of Gastroenterology of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Zaiyuan Ye
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Pancreatic Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Key Laboratory of Gastroenterology of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Wu X, Dinglin X, Wang X, Luo W, Shen Q, Li Y, Gu L, Zhou Q, Zhu H, Li Y, Tan C, Yang X, Zhang Z. Long noncoding RNA XIST promotes malignancies of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma via regulation of miR-101/EZH2. Oncotarget 2017; 8:76015-76028. [PMID: 29100288 PMCID: PMC5652682 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.18638] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2017] [Accepted: 05/22/2017] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
The long non-coding RNA XIST is a long non-coding RNA that associates with polycomb repressive complex 2 to regulate X-chromosome inactivation in female mammals. The biological roles as well as the underlying mechanisms of XIST in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma remained yet to be solved. Our data indicated that XIST was significantly upregulated in esophageal squamous cancerous tissues and cancer cell lines, as compared with that in the corresponding non-cancerous tissues and immortalized normal squamous epithelial cells. High XIST expression predicted poor prognosis of esophageal squamous cancer patients. Lentivirus mediated knockdown of XIST inhibited proliferation, migration and invasion of esophageal squamous cancer cells in vitro and suppressed tumor growth in vivo. Knockdown of XIST resulted in elevated expression of miR-101 and decreased expression of EZH2. Further analysis showed that XIST functioned as the competitive endogenous RNA of miR-101 to regulate EZH2 expression. Moreover, enforced expression of EZH2 significantly attenuated the anti-proliferation activity upon XIST knockdown. Conclusively, XIST plays an important role in malignant progression of ESCC via modulation of miR-101/EZH2 axis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaoliang Wu
- Department of Oncology, Guizhou Provincial People's Hospital, Guiyang, China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China & Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xiaoxiao Dinglin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xing Wang
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China & Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Wen Luo
- Department of Oncology, Guizhou Provincial People's Hospital, Guiyang, China
| | - Qi Shen
- Department of Oncology, Guizhou Provincial People's Hospital, Guiyang, China
| | - Yong Li
- Department of Oncology, Guizhou Provincial People's Hospital, Guiyang, China
| | - Ling Gu
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China & Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.,Puer University, Puer, China
| | - Qianghua Zhou
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China & Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Haotu Zhu
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China & Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yanjie Li
- The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Chaodi Tan
- Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xianzi Yang
- Affiliated Cancer Hospital & Institute of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zhenfeng Zhang
- Department of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China & Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Influence of Surgical Resection of Hepatic Metastases From Gastric Adenocarcinoma on Long-term Survival: Systematic Review and Pooled Analysis. Ann Surg 2017; 263:1092-101. [PMID: 26797324 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000001542] [Citation(s) in RCA: 107] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The objectives of this systematic review and pooled analysis were to examine long-term survival, morbidity, and mortality following surgical resection of gastric cancer hepatic metastases and to identify prognostic factors that improve survival. BACKGROUND Patients with hepatic metastases from gastric cancer are traditionally treated with palliative chemotherapy. METHODS A systematic literature search was undertaken (1990 to 2015). Publications were included if they studied more than 10 patients undergoing hepatectomy for hepatic metastasis from gastric adenocarcinoma in the absence of peritoneal disease or other distant organ involvement. The primary outcome was the hazard ratio (HR) for overall survival. The influence of liver metastasis related factors; multiple vs single and metachronous vs synchronous upon survival was also assessed. RESULTS The median number of resections for the 39 studies included was 21 (range 10 to 64). Procedures were associated with a median 30-day morbidity of 24% (0% to 47%) and mortality of 0% (0% to 30%). The median 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year survival were 68%, 31%, and 27%, respectively. Survival was improved in Far Eastern compared with Western studies; 1-year (73% vs 59%), 3-year (34% vs 24.5%), and 5-year (27.3% vs 16.5%). Surgical resection of hepatic metastases was associated with a significantly improved overall survival (HR = 0.50; P < 0.001). Meta-analysis confirmed the additional survival benefit of solitary compared with multiple hepatic metastases (odds ratio = 0.31; P = 0.011). CONCLUSIONS The observed improved survival rates following the resection of hepatic metastasis from gastric adenocarcinoma in selected patients merit a prospective study to formally address the survival benefits and the influence on quality of life of such approach.
Collapse
|
47
|
Curtis NJ, Davids J, Foster JD, Francis NK. Objective assessment of minimally invasive total mesorectal excision performance: a systematic review. Tech Coloproctol 2017; 21:259-268. [PMID: 28470365 DOI: 10.1007/s10151-017-1614-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2017] [Accepted: 02/28/2017] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Laparoscopy is widely used in colorectal practice, but recent trial results have questioned its use in rectal cancer resections. Patient outcomes are directly linked to the quality of total mesorectal excision (TME) specimen. Objective assessment of intraoperative performance could help ensure competence and delivery of optimal outcomes. Objective tools may also contribute to TME intervention trials, but their nature, structure and utilisation is unknown. AIM To systemically review the available literature to report on the available tools for the objective assessment of minimally invasive TME operative performance and their use within multicentre laparoscopic TME randomised controlled trials. METHODS A systematic search of the PubMed and Cochrane databases was performed to identify tools used in the objective intraoperative assessment of minimally invasive TME performance in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines, independently by two authors. The identified tools were then evaluated within reported TME RCTs. RESULTS A total of 8642 abstracts were screened of which 12 papers met the inclusion criteria; ten prospective observational studies, one randomised trial and one educational consensus. Eight assessment methods were described, which include formative and summative tools. The tools were mostly adaptations of colonic surgery tools based on either operative video review or post-operative trainer rating. All studies reported objective assessment of intraoperative performance was feasible, but only 126 (7%) of the 1762 included laparoscopic cases were TME. No multicentre laparoscopic TME trial reported using any objective surgical performance assessment tool. CONCLUSION Objective intraoperative laparoscopic TME performance assessment is feasible, but most of the current tools are adaptation of colonic surgery. There is a need to develop dedicated assessment tools for minimal access rectal surgery. No multicentre minimally invasive TME RCT reported using any objective assessment tool.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N J Curtis
- Clinical Research Unit, Department of General Surgery, Yeovil District Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Higher Kingston, Yeovil, Somerset, BA21 4AT, UK.,Department of Surgery and Cancer, St Mary's Hospital, Imperial College London, Praed Street, London, UK
| | - J Davids
- Clinical Research Unit, Department of General Surgery, Yeovil District Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Higher Kingston, Yeovil, Somerset, BA21 4AT, UK
| | - J D Foster
- Clinical Research Unit, Department of General Surgery, Yeovil District Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Higher Kingston, Yeovil, Somerset, BA21 4AT, UK.,Department of Surgery and Cancer, St Mary's Hospital, Imperial College London, Praed Street, London, UK
| | - N K Francis
- Clinical Research Unit, Department of General Surgery, Yeovil District Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Higher Kingston, Yeovil, Somerset, BA21 4AT, UK. .,Faculty of Science, University of Bath, Wessex House 3.22, Bath, Somerset, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Kurokawa Y, Yamaguchi T, Sasako M, Sano T, Mizusawa J, Nakamura K, Fukuda H. Institutional variation in short- and long-term outcomes after surgery for gastric or esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma: correlative study of two randomized phase III trials (JCOG9501 and JCOG9502). Gastric Cancer 2017; 20:508-516. [PMID: 27568321 DOI: 10.1007/s10120-016-0636-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2016] [Accepted: 08/17/2016] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A critical issue in multicenter randomized trials focusing on surgical techniques is quality control, as the quality of the surgery usually varies widely if the procedure employed is complicated. Few studies have evaluated interinstitutional variation in randomized trials in order to check not only the generalizability of the results but also the reliability of the study group itself. METHODS Two randomized phase III trials (JCOG9501 and JCOG9502) were conducted that compared standard and experimental surgery for gastric and esophagogastric junction adenocarcinomas. Mixed effects models were used to examine short- and long-term outcome data for 521 patients from 23 hospitals in JCOG9501 and 157 patients from 21 hospitals in JCOG9502. RESULTS In both trials, some variation was observed in the number of dissected lymph nodes, the operative time, and the volume of blood lost. Estimated 5-year overall survival after standard surgery differed among hospitals (JCOG9501, 58.0-75.1 %; JCOG9502, 49.1-58.7 %), while there was little variation in the hazard ratio for overall survival (OS) for experimental versus standard surgery (JCOG9501, 1.05-1.48; JCOG9502, 1.44-1.48). Higher hospital gastrectomy volume was significantly correlated with a lower proportion of postoperative complications in JCOG9501 (ρ = -0.524, P = 0.010) and reduced blood loss in JCOG9502 (ρ = -0.442, P = 0.045). OS was not correlated with hospital or surgeon volume. CONCLUSIONS There was some degree of interinstitutional variation in outcomes after standard surgery, but there was little variation in the hazard ratio for OS for experimental surgery, indicating that the final conclusions of the two randomized phase III trials can be generalized to their respective target populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yukinori Kurokawa
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Takuhiro Yamaguchi
- Division of Biostatistics, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Mitsuru Sasako
- Department of Multidisciplinary Surgical Oncology, Hyogo College of Medicine, 1-1, Mukogawa-cho, Nishinomiya, Hyogo, 663-8501, Japan.
| | - Takeshi Sano
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Junki Mizusawa
- Japan Clinical Oncology Group Data Center, National Cancer Center, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kenichi Nakamura
- Japan Clinical Oncology Group Data Center, National Cancer Center, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Haruhiko Fukuda
- Japan Clinical Oncology Group Data Center, National Cancer Center, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Impact of Extent of Lymphadenectomy on Survival, Post Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Transthoracic Esophagectomy. Ann Surg 2017; 265:750-756. [DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000001737] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
|
50
|
Goody RB, MacKay H, Pitcher B, Oza A, Siu LL, Kim J, Wong RKS, Chen E, Swallow C, Knox J, Kassam Z, Cummings B, Feld R, Hedley D, Liu G, Krzyzanowska MK, Dinniwell R, Brade AM, Dawson LA, Pintilie M, Ringash J. Phase 1/2 Study of the Addition of Cisplatin to Adjuvant Chemotherapy With Image Guided High-Precision Radiation Therapy for Completely Resected Gastric Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2016; 96:994-1002. [PMID: 27745984 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2016.08.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2016] [Revised: 08/16/2016] [Accepted: 08/23/2016] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Locoregional recurrence is common after surgery for gastric cancer. Adjuvant therapy improves outcomes but with toxicity. This phase 1/2 study investigated infusional 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in combination with biweekly cisplatin delivered concurrently with image guided high-precision radiation therapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS Eligible patients had completely resected stage IB to IV (Union for International Cancer Control TNM 6th edition) nonmetastatic gastric adenocarcinoma. Treatment constituted 12 weeks of infusional 5-FU (200 mg/m2/day) with cisplatin added in a standard 3 + 3 dose escalation protocol (0, 20, 30, and 40 mg/m2) during weeks 1, 3, 5, and 7, and an additional week 9 dose in the final cohort. Radiation therapy (45 Gy in 25 fractions) was delivered during weeks 3 to 7. Maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was determined in phase 1 and confirmed in phase 2. RESULTS Among the 55 patients (median age, 54 years; range 28-77 years; 55% male), the median follow-up time was 3.0 years (range, 0.3-5.3 years). Five patients in phase 1 experienced dose-limiting toxicity, and MTD was determined as 4 cycles of 40 mg/m2 cisplatin. Twenty-seven patients were treated at MTD. Acute grade 3 to 4 toxicity rate was 37.0% at MTD and 29.1% across all dose levels. No treatment-related deaths occurred. Fourteen patients experienced recurrent disease. The 2-year overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival were 85% and 74%, respectively. Median OS has not been reached. Quality of life (QOL) was impaired during treatment, but most scores recovered by 4 weeks. CONCLUSION Cisplatin can be safely delivered with 5-FU-based chemoradiation therapy. Acute toxicity was acceptable, and patient-reported QOL showed the regimen was tolerable. Outcomes are encouraging and justify further study of this regimen.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca B Goody
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Helen MacKay
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Bethany Pitcher
- Department of Biostatistics, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Amit Oza
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Lillian L Siu
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - John Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Rebecca K S Wong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Eric Chen
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Carol Swallow
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jennifer Knox
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Zahra Kassam
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, Stronach Regional Cancer Centre, Newmarket, Ontario, Canada
| | - Bernard Cummings
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ron Feld
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - David Hedley
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Geoffrey Liu
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Monika K Krzyzanowska
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Robert Dinniwell
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Anthony M Brade
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Laura A Dawson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Melania Pintilie
- Department of Biostatistics, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jolie Ringash
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|