FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab versus FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab as first-line treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: updated overall survival and molecular subgroup analyses of the open-label, phase 3 TRIBE study

Durable response to third-line combination therapy in a metastatic colorectal cancer patient with BRAF V600E mutation: A case report

In metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), the BRAFV600E mutation subtype is one of the subtypes with the worst prognosis. The long-term abnormal activation of multiple signaling pathways caused by the BRAF V600E mutation is closely related to the formation of BRAF inhibitor resistance and drug-resistant tumor cell subpopulations. These factors significantly impact the survival and prognosis of CRC patients. Therefore, treating mCRC patients with the BRAFV600E mutation, particularly in later stages, is challenging. We reported a case of an mCRC patient with the BRAF V600E mutation in the primary and metastatic tumors. After the failure of second-line treatment, this patient received a combination therapy including immunotherapy (tislelizumab), radiotherapy, and targeted therapy (fruquintinib). Through comprehensive imaging evaluations and continuous monitoring of tumor markers, we were astonished to observe that the patient has achieved and maintained a complete response (CR) for over 12 months. This case supports the efficacy of combination therapy in mCRC patients with the BRAF V600E mutation.

Tumoral and circulating genomic landscape inform survival differences in colorectal carcinomatosis

Colorectal peritoneal metastases (CPM) are the third most common site of metastatic spread of colorectal cancer and are associated with worse survival than other sites of metastatic disease. In recent years tumoral circulating tumoral DNA (ctDNA) mutational status has been increasingly utilized in clinical decision making for metastatic colorectal cancer patients despite its utility in CPM being poorly understood. Here we describe standard of care performed mutational profiles and associated outcomes for unresectable CPM patients, with a contextual comparison to 160 unresected colorectal liver metastases (CLM) patients. Of 508 patients, 288 (57 %) had CPM alone and 220 (43 %) had CPM with extraperitoneal metastases. Patients with synchronous CPM and CLM had worse overall survival (HR 1.67 [95 %CI 1.26-2.22]). Mutations in ctDNA were noted in 110/145 (75.9 %) of CPM patients, with mutations in KRAS or PIK3CA ctDNA being associated with worse survival. Importantly, the association between tumoral mutational profile and survival differed by site of metastatic disease. The prognostic significance of specific mutations, particularly BRAF and KRAS, differs between patients with CPM and CLM, and supports the distinct biology of these metastatic sites and the importance of tissue and circulating genomic profiling to risk-stratify these patients according to site of metastasis.

Angiogenesis causes and vasculogenic mimicry formation in the context of cancer stem cells

Tumor occurrence, development, invasion, and metastasis are regulated by multiple mechanisms. Among these, angiogenesis promotes tumor progression mainly by supplying tumor tissue and providing channels for tumor metastasis. Cancer stem cells (CSCs) are another important factor affecting tumor progression by involving in tumor initiation and development, while remaining insensitive to conventional antitumor treatments. Among treatment strategies for them, owing to the existence of alternative angiogenic pathways or the risk of damaging normal stem cells, the clinical effect is not ideal. Angiogenesis and CSCs may influence each other in this process. Tumor angiogenesis can support CSC self-renewal by providing a suitable microenvironment, whereas CSCs can regulate tumor neovascularization and mediate drug resistance to anti-angiogenic therapy. This review summarized the role of vascular niche formed by angiogenesis in CSC self-renewal and stemness maintenance, and the function of CSCs in endothelial progenitor cell differentiation and pro-angiogenic factor upregulation. We also elucidated the malignant loop between CSCs and angiogenesis promoting tumor progression. Additionally, we summarized and proposed therapeutic targets, including blocking tumor-derived endothelial differentiation, inhibiting pro-angiogenic factor upregulation, and directly targeting endothelial-like cells comprising CSCs. And we analyzed the feasibility of these strategies to identify more effective methods to improve tumor treatment.

A Phase Ia/b study of MEK1/2 inhibitor binimetinib with MET inhibitor crizotinib in patients with RAS mutant advanced colorectal cancer (MErCuRIC)

BACKGROUND

Targeting RAS mutant (MT) colorectal cancer (CRC) remains a difficult challenge, mainly due to the pervasiveness of RAS/MEK-mediated feedback loops. Preclinical studies identified MET/STAT3 as an important mediator of resistance to KRAS-MEK1/2 blockade in RASMT CRC. This dose escalation/expansion study assessed safety and initial efficacy of the MEK1/2 inhibitor binimetinib with MET inhibitor crizotinib in RASMT advanced CRC patients.

METHODS

In the dose escalation phase, patients with advanced solid tumours received binimetinib with crizotinib, using a rolling- 6 design to determine the maximum tolerable dose (MTD) and safety/tolerability. A subsequent dose expansion in RASMT CRC patients assessed treatment response. Blood samples for pharmacokinetics, MET biomarker and ctDNA analyses, and skin/tumour biopsies for pharmacodynamics, c-MET immunohistochemistry (IHC), MET in situ hybridisation (ISH) and MET DNA-ISH analyses were collected.

RESULTS

Twenty patients were recruited in 3 cohorts in the dose escalation. The MTD was binimetinib 30 mg B.D, days 1-21 every 28 days, with crizotinib 250 mg O.D continuously. Dose-limiting toxicities included grade ≥ 3 transaminitis, creatinine phosphokinase increases and fatigue. Thirty-six RASMT metastatic CRC patients were enrolled in the dose expansion. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters showed evidence of target engagement. Across the entire study, the most frequent treatment-related adverse events (TR-AE) were rash (80.4%), fatigue (53.4%) and diarrhoea (51.8%) with grade ≥ 3 TR-AE occurring in 44.6%. Best clinical response within the RASMT CRC cohort was stable disease in seven patients (24%). Tumour MET super-expression (IHC H-score > 180 and MET ISH + 3) was observed in 7 patients (24.1%), with MET-amplification only present in 1 of these patients. This patient discontinued treatment early during cycle 1 due to toxicity. Patients with high baseline RASMT allele frequency had a significant shorter median overall survival compared with that seen for patients with low baseline KRASMT allele frequency.

CONCLUSIONS

Combination binimetinib/crizotinib showed a poor tolerability with no objective responses observed in RASMT advanced CRC patients. EudraCT-Number: 2014-000463 - 40 (20/06/2014: A Sequential Phase I study of MEK1/2 inhibitors PD- 0325901 or Binimetinib combined with cMET inhibitor Crizotinib in RAS Mutant and RAS Wild Type with aberrant c-MET).

Sporadic Mucinous Adenocarcinoma of the Colon in an Adolescent Male: A Case Report and Review of the Literature

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is commonly seen in adult patients but makes up <1% of cancers in pediatric patients, with the largest known pediatric study having a sample size of 81 patients taken over a span of roughly 40 years. Patients typically present with nonspecific symptoms such as abdominal pain, nausea, and vomiting, which can result in the diagnosis being missed. Histopathology is typically unfavorable with signet ring colon cancer and mucinous adenocarcinoma with signet ring cell features being common. Treatment guidelines are based largely on adult protocols and include surgical resection followed by chemotherapy, with the addition of bevacizumab or cetuximab in higher-risk populations. In our case, we present a 17-year-old male with abdominal pain and weight loss who was found to have metastatic sporadic mucinous adenocarcinoma with signet ring cell features. Oncotype next-generation sequencing was found to be microsatellite stable, human epithelial growth factor receptor 2 negative, Kristen rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog/v-raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B1/neuroblastoma reticular activating system wild type, and low tumor mutation burden with 3.7 mutations per megabase. He was treated with FOLFIRINOX at 70% dosing without bevacizumab due to recurrent admissions for small bowel obstructions and surgeries. Unfortunately, his cancer did not respond, so he proceeded with palliative chemotherapy. He expired 12 months later. This case raises the need for research on the biology of CRC in pediatric patients, as it is different from adults. It also underlines the necessity of the development of guidelines on CRC treatment in pediatric patients by initiating pediatric clinical trials or lowering the age of adult trials to under 18 years of age.

Molecular hyperselection for optimal choice of first-line targeted therapy independent of primary tumor sidedness: An exploratory analysis of the randomized FIRE-3 study performed in RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer

INTRODUCTION

Molecular diagnostics play a pivotal role in guiding therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Current guidelines recommend stratification based on biomarkers such as RAS, BRAF, and DNA mismatch-repair (MMR) status to select between anti-EGFR (epidermal growth factor receptor) and anti-VEGF (vascular endothelial growth factor) therapies.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective analysis evaluated the randomized FIRE-3 study that compared first-line treatment with FOLFIRI plus cetuximab to FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab in RAS wild-type patients. The present analysis included 199 patients with RAS/BRAF wild-type MMR proficient tumors. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) was successfully performed in all patients and allowed stratification into hyperselected (no predefined genetic alterations) or gene altered subgroups using the previously published approach of the PRESSING-studies.

RESULTS

Hyperselection according to PRESSING-3 was associated with a survival benefit from anti-EGFR-based therapy compared to bevacizumab (38.5 months vs. 27.5 months; HR 0.68; 95 % CI, 0.44-1.05; P = 0.08). This benefit was observed in both, right- and left-sided tumors, (HR 0.58 and HR 0.70). Patients with gene alterations showed inferior survival compared to hyperselected patients across all subgroups. In this unfavorable subgroup, application of cetuximab and bevacizumab were associated with comparable OS (total cohort: HR 1.04; 95 % CI, 0.61-1.79). Again, this finding was independent of primary tumor sidedness (left-sided tumors: HR 1.10; 95 % CI, 0.59-2.07; right-sided tumors: HR 1.05; 95 % CI, 0.31-3.55).

CONCLUSION

Molecular hyperselection facilitated by next generation sequencing could replace primary tumor sidedness as a tool of decision making for optimal choice of targeted therapy in first-line treatment of RAS wild-type mCRC.

Targeting NUCKS1 with a fragment of tRNAAsn(GUU) of Chinese yew for the treatment of colorectal cancer

Despite the discovery of numerous oncogenes in colorectal cancer (CRC), the development of associated drugs is limited, posing a significant challenge for CRC treatment. Identification of novel druggable targets is therefore crucial for the therapeutic development of CRC. Here, we report the first investigation on therapeutics targeting the potent oncogene NUCKS1 to suppress cancer progression. NUCKS1-orientated bioinformatics screening of NUCKS1 inhibitors from our library of tRNA fragments originated from medicinal plants identified tRF-T36, a 5' tRNA fragment of tRNAAsn(GUU) of Chinese yew (Taxus chinensis), exhibiting stronger inhibitory effects than taxol against CRC progression. Mechanistically, tRF-T36 binds directly to the 3' UTR of NUCKS1 mRNA to downregulate its expressions via RNAi pathway. High-throughput RNA sequencing indicated that the downregulated NUCKS1 induced by tRF-T36 further inhibits PI3K/Akt pathway, as verified by the significantly efficacy decrease of tRF-T36 mimic in co-treatment with 740Y-P, an agonist of PI3K/Akt pathway. Collectively, our findings emphasize the importance of NUCKS1 as a promising druggable target for CRC. Furthermore, the present study provides the first siRNA sequence, tRF-T36 mimic, as small RNA drug candidate, thereby shedding light on CRC therapeutics.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of FOLFOXIRI/FOLFOXIRI and mFOLFOX6/FOLFIRI treatment in first-line and second-line chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of FOLFOXIRI/FOLFOXIRI compared with mFOLFOX6/FOLFIRI in first-line and second-line chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) from the perspectives of the USA and China, respectively, and provide a decision-making basis for clinical selection of these two regimens.

DESIGN

The study used a decision-analytic Markov model to simulate the process of mCRC, including three distinct health states: progression-free survival, progressive disease and death. Clinical data were derived from the TRIBE2 trial.Costs and utilities were obtained from local public databases and literature. One-way sensitivity analyses and probabilistic sensitivity analysis were also performed to explore the parameters' uncertainty in this study.

PARTICIPANTS

The main included patients were histologically confirmed colorectal adenocarcinoma.

INTERVENTIONS

First-line and second-line treatment with either FOLFOXIRI/FOLFOXIRI or mFOLFOX6/FOLFIRI.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Costs, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were calculated over a lifetime horizon as primary outcomes.

RESULTS

Patients treated with the FOLFOXIRI/FOLFOXIRI regimen produced 0.08 QALYs in the USA while 0.04 QALYs in China compared with the mFOLFOX6/FOLFIRI regimen. The final ICERs for FOLFOXIRI/FOLFOXIRI were US$5127.70 per QALY and US$30 478.33 per QALY in the USA and China, which are below the willingness-to-pay (WTP) thresholds. In the USA, when the WTP was US$100 000 for each QALY gained, the probability was nearly 99.6% that the FOLFOXIRI/FOLFOXIRI treatment was cost-effective. In China, when the WTP was US$36 053.01 (3 × GDP) for each QALY gained, the probability was nearly 54.7% that FOLFOXIRI/FOLFOXIRI treatment was cost-effective.

CONCLUSION

Patients with mCRC treated with FOLFOXIRI/FOLFOXIRI as first-line and second-line chemotherapy may improve health outcomes and expend financial resources more efficiently than mFOLFOX6/FOLFIRI whether in China or the USA, which benefits not only individual survival but also the health care system from a value perspective.

Patients with Colorectal Cancer and BRAFV600E-Mutation in Argentina: A Real-World Study-The EMOGI-CRC01 Study

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

The BRAF-mutation is a poor prognostic factor in colorectal cancer (CRC). There is a need for real-world data in low-middle-income countries regarding clinical characteristics, outcomes, and treatment strategies. This study aims to describe progression-free survival (PFS) and in the first- and second-line setting and sequences of treatment regimens.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyze patients from ten oncology centers in Argentina, diagnosed with BRAFV600E-mutated advanced CRC between January 2014 and July 2023.

RESULTS

A total of 161 patients with metastatic CRC and BRAFV600E-mutation. The median age was 58.5 (IQR 47-69), and 21.7% were MMR-deficient (dMMR). Of these patients, 93.8% received first-line treatment. With a median follow-up of 23 months (95% CI 16.5-33.4 months), the median PFS was 9 months (95% CI 7.4-10.5 months). The most common regimen in first line setting was doublet chemotherapy plus anti-VEGF for 49% of the patients. Twenty-six percent of the patients received BRAF inhibitors in the second-line setting, with a median PFS of 5.2 months (95% CI 4.9-NR); the overall response rate (ORR) was 10.5%.

CONCLUSIONS

This study represents, to the best of our knowledge, the largest published real-world cohort of BRAFV600E-mutated CRC in Latin America. The heterogeneity of the treatments reflects the existence of barriers to access to high-cost drugs in our country. Cooperative efforts are needed to understand the particular characteristics of this subgroup of patients.

Real-world evaluation of treatment patterns and clinical outcomes in patients with BRAF-V600E metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in Canada

BACKGROUND

BRAF V600E mutations are identified in 10 % of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) cases. In this project, we evaluated the clinicopathologic features and natural history of patients with BRAF mutant (BRAF-mt) mCRC prior to era of BRAF targeted therapy.

METHODS

This is a retrospective project evaluating patients with diagnosed with mCRC with an identified BRAF V600E mutation between January 1, 2015 and December 31, 2021 seen at the Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre prior to the approval of cetuximab and encorafenib in Canada. Demographic, clinical, and cancer characteristics were collected from the medical records. Outcomes of interest included overall survival (OS) and time to next therapy (TNT).

RESULTS

71 patients were included. The median age was 69 years, 37 (52 %) patients were females, and 19 (27 %) were mismatch repair deficient (dMMR). Median OS was 12.9 months with 21 (30 %) patients living greater than 2-years. Signet ring histology (HR=7.27, p < 0.001), peritoneal metastasis (HR=2.29, 0.003), distant lymphatic metastasis (HR=2.70, p < 0.001), brain metastasis (HR=2.86, p < 0.048) and metastatectomy (HR=0.17, p < 0.001) were associated with OS. Forty-six (65 %) patients received first-line systemic therapy, 14 (20 %) second-line and 2 (3 %) third-line. Median duration of therapy was 8.5 months for first-line, 5.5 months for second-line and 1.5 months for third-line.

CONCLUSION

Real world data demonstrates that patients with BRAF-V600E mCRC have poor clinical outcomes with traditional systemic therapies. Only a minority of patients received second- or third-line systemic treatments, highlighting the importance of ongoing research evaluating incorporation of targeted therapy in first-line treatment.

Unveiling radiobiological traits and therapeutic responses of BRAFV600E-mutant colorectal cancer via patient-derived organoids

BACKGROUND

Radiotherapy (RT) is an essential treatment for colorectal cancer (CRC), yet the factors influencing radiosensitivity remain unclear. In the quest to enhance the therapeutic efficacy in CRC, the interplay between genetic mutations and RT sensitivity has emerged as a pivotal yet enigmatic area.

METHODS

We harness the fidelity of patient-derived organoids (PDOs) to dissect the molecular landscape of radiosensitivity, with a particular emphasis on BRAFV600E mutations. To further investigate, a cohort of 9 BRAFV600E-mutant and 10 BRAF wild-type PDOs is constructed to systematically assess the radiobiological traits of BRAFV600E-mutant CRC, including morphology, cell viability, and DNA damage, while also evaluating their responses to chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy.

RESULTS

Our systematic investigation unveils a profound correlation between BRAFV600E mutation status and radioresistance, which is validated by clinical treatment responses. Intriguingly, BRAFV600E-mutant PDOs exhibit reduced sensitivity to conventional chemotherapy, yet demonstrate an enhanced response to combined chemoradiotherapy, characterized by increased apoptosis. The results are validated through in vivo analyses using patient-derived organoid xenograft mouse models and aligned with patient clinical outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

This study outlines the distinct radiobiological profile of BRAFV600E-mutant CRC, underscoring the critical role of radiotherapy in comprehensive treatment strategies. This work not only advances our molecular understanding of CRC but also paves the way for precision medicine, offering valuable insights for therapeutic decision-making in the clinical management of BRAFV600E-mutant CRC.

A phase two trial evaluating FOLFIRI plus aflibercept after failure of FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab in patients with unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab (BEV) is an option for first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). However, there is no consensus on the optimal treatment strategy when disease progresses. The EFFORT open-label, multicenter, single-arm phase II study investigated whether FOLFIRI plus aflibercept retains activity after progression of FOLFOXIRI plus BEV treatment.

METHODS

The patients with unresectable mCRC who failed first-line FOLFOXIRI plus BEV received FOLFIRI plus aflibercept. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) in the full analysis set (FAS). Angiogenic biomarkers were measured before treatment initiation.

RESULTS

From April 2019 to May 2021, 35 patients were enrolled and 34 were analysed in the FAS population (men, 18; median age, 63 years [range: 32-78]). The primary tumor was left-sided in most cases (23/34), 23 patients were RAS mutant, 3 patients had BRAF V600E mutation and 27 patients had liver metastases. The primary end-point was met with a median PFS of 4.3 months [80% confidence interval [CI] 3.7-5.1]. Median overall survival was 15.2 months [95% CI 8.9-22.7]. Per RECIST, there were 1 complete response, 4 partial responses, 21 stable diseases and 8 disease progressions. Overall response rate was 14.7% [95% CI 5.0-31.1], and disease control rate was 76.5% [95% CI 58.8-89.3]. Responses were more common in patients with high VEGF-C, low VEGF-D and low PlGF levels before treatment.

CONCLUSION

FOLFIRI plus aflibercept, administered after failure of FOLFOXIRI plus BEV, is effective and has a manageable safety profile. This regimen may be a useful second-line treatment option for these patients.

Clinicopathological Features and Prognosis of Unresectable Colorectal Cancer With the BRAF V600E Mutation

Background/Aim

Patients with unresectable advanced and recurrent colorectal cancer (CRC) and the BRAF V600E mutation have poor prognosis, and conventional chemotherapy is often ineffective. This study aimed to retrospectively evaluate the clinicopathological features and prognosis of this patient population.

Patients and methods

We examined clinicopathological characteristics and treatment outcomes of 26 patients with BRAF V600E-mutated unresectable advanced and recurrent CRC treated between June 2015 and October 2022.

Results

The mean age was 63.1±14.0 years; out of 26 patients, nine (34.6%) were female, 12 (46.2%) had right-sided CRC, and eight (30.8%) had poorly differentiated or mucinous adenocarcinoma. One patient (3.8%) had a RAS mutation, and three (11.5%) had high microsatellite instability. The median overall survival (OS) was 12.0 months. The median OS for patients treated with the BEACON regimen (encorafenib plus cetuximab, with or without binimetinib) was 13.3 months, which was significantly better than that of patients treated without it (7.2 months; hazard ratio=4.180, 95% confidence interval=1.036-18.631, p=0.029). The median progression-free survival for patients treated with BEACON regimen was 6.6 months.

Conclusion

The BRAF V600E mutation was associated with poor prognosis. The BEACON regimen resulted in improved OS compared with other CRC treatment regimens.

Preoperative liquid biopsy for optimal patient selection in metastatic colorectal cancer

OBJECTIVE

In this pilot study, we sought to determine if preoperative circulating tumor DNA could be a useful predictor to avoid futile metastasectomy, predict early postoperative recurrence, and determine optimal chemotherapy duration during the management of patients with resectable metastatic colorectal cancer.

METHODS

Patients from 2021 to 2023 were enrolled prospectively and evaluated with circulating tumor DNA preoperatively and postoperatively for detection of recurrence. Clinicopathologic and treatment factors as well as disease-free survival were compared between those with undetectable versus detectable preoperative circulating tumor DNA.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight patients were evaluated, with a median follow-up time of 24 months. The median preoperative circulating tumor DNA level was 0.16 MTM/mL [0.00, 2.30]. Of the 10 patients (40%) with a preoperative circulating tumor DNA level of zero, 5 patients (50%) recurred between 4 and 18 months postoperatively. Among the 18 patients whose disease recurred, 10 patients (56%) had circulating tumor DNA detected postoperatively. Median change between preoperative and postoperative circulating tumor DNA levels was 0.00 [-0.02, 0.05] in those who did not recur and 0.00 [-7.04, 0.00] in those who recurred. When disease-free survival was evaluated by detectable versus undetectable preoperative circulating tumor DNA levels, there was no difference in disease-free survival estimates (P value = .11). On univariate Cox proportional hazards analysis, the preoperative circulating tumor DNA level, change between preoperative and postoperative circulating tumor DNA levels, and postoperative circulating tumor DNA levels did not influence disease-free survival. However, those with detectable postoperative circulating tumor DNA were 3.96 (95% confidence interval 1.30-12.06) times as likely to recur compared to those with undetectable postoperative circulating tumor DNA.

CONCLUSION

New technologies including use of circulating tumor DNA may help better predict which patients with colorectal liver metastases will undergo futile surgery. Our preliminary findings suggest that postoperative, and not preoperative, circulating tumor DNA is predictive of recurrence following metastasectomy. Use of circulating tumor DNA in guiding operative management should be done in conjunction with high-quality imaging and other serologic markers to determine which patients with colorectal liver metastases are likely to receive durable benefit from operative intervention.

Expert consensus on the optimal management of BRAFV600E-mutant metastatic colorectal cancer in the Asia-Pacific region

The burden of colorectal cancer (CRC) is high in the Asia-Pacific region, and several countries in this region have among the highest and/or fastest growing rates of CRC in the world. A significant proportion of patients will present with or develop metastatic CRC (mCRC), and BRAFV600E-mutant mCRC represents a particularly aggressive phenotype that is less responsive to standard chemotherapies. In light of recent therapeutic advances, an Asia-Pacific expert consensus panel was convened to develop evidence-based recommendations for the diagnosis, treatment, and management of patients with BRAFV600E-mutant mCRC. The expert panel comprised nine medical oncologists from Australia, Hong Kong, Singapore, and Taiwan (the authors), who met to review current literature and develop eight consensus statements that describe the optimal management of BRAFV600E-mutant mCRC in the Asia-Pacific region. As agreed by the expert panel, the consensus statements recommend molecular testing at diagnosis to guide individualized treatment decisions, propose optimal treatment pathways according to microsatellite stability status, advocate for more frequent monitoring of BRAFV600E-mutant mCRC, and discuss local treatment strategies for oligometastatic disease. Together, these expert consensus statements are intended to optimize treatment and improve outcomes for patients with BRAFV600E-mutant mCRC in the Asia-Pacific region.

U-shaped association between pan-immune-inflammation value and periodontitis: NHANES 2009-2014

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to investigate the relationship between the pan-immune-inflammation value (PIV) and periodontitis based on a large national survey.

METHODS

In the present cross-sectional study, data were obtained from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2009-2014, which included a total of 10,300 participants. The categorization of periodontitis was based on the 2017 classification scheme. The PIV was determined using the formula: (neutrophils count × monocyte count × platelet count)/lymphocytes count. Restricted cubic spline and weighted multivariable logistic regression analyses were employed to evaluate the associations between the PIV with periodontitis.

RESULTS

The associations between PIV and stage III/IV periodontitis followed a U-shaped pattern (Pnon-linearity < 0.001). The risk of developing stage III/IV periodontitis showed an increasing trend among participants in the first quartile (odds ratio [OR] = 1.21; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01-1.46), third quartile (OR = 1.34; 95% CI: 1.11-1.61), and fourth quartile (OR = 1.47; 95% CI: 1.25-1.73) compared to those in the second quartile. Subgroup analysis indicated stronger associations of PIV with periodontitis in males (ORQ4vs2 = 1.72, 95% CI: 1.36-2.18) and individuals with hypertension (ORQ4vs2 = 1.78, 95% CI: 1.38-2.28) with significant interactions (Pinteraction < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

There is a U-shaped association between PIV and stage III/IV periodontitis, which suggests a potential adjunctive treatment strategy for periodontitis. Higher PIV values were found to have a stronger correlation with stage III/IV periodontitis in males and individuals with hypertension. Further prospective trials are needed to confirm the validity of our results.

PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY

A U-shaped association exists between the pan-immune inflammation value and periodontitis in US adults, suggesting that maintaining a moderate immune inflammation response is crucial for periodontal health.

Evaluation of circulating tumor DNA as a prognostic and predictive biomarker in BRAF V600E mutated colorectal cancer-results from the FIRE-4.5 study

The randomized FIRE-4.5 (AIO KRK0116) trial compared first-line therapy with FOLFOXIRI (folinic acid, fluorouracil, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan) plus either cetuximab or bevacizumab in B-Raf proto-oncogene, serine/threonine kinase (BRAF) V600E-mutant metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients. This study was accompanied by a prospective translational project analyzing cell-free circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in plasma to test whether ctDNA analysis may help to guide clinical treatment decision making. FIRE-4.5 included mCRC patients with BRAF V600E mutation detected by tissue-based analyses. Liquid biopsies (LBs) were collected at baseline (pre-treatment) and during therapy. Digital droplet PCR (ddPCR) technology was applied for determination of BRAF mutations and the in vitro diagnostics (IVD)-certified ONCOBEAM RAS procedure for analysis of RAS mutations. The BRAF V600E variants in ctDNA were analyzable in 66 patients at start of the therapy, at baseline. No BRAF V600E mutations were detected in 26% (17/66) of patients and was associated with a significantly longer progression-free survival (PFS: 13.2 vs 6.5 months; HR 0.47; P = 0.014) and overall survival (OS: 36.8 vs 13.2 months; HR 0.35; P = 0.02) as compared to ctDNA mutant patients. Patients with detectable BRAF mutations showed a clear superiority of FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab with regard to PFS (10.4 vs 5.7 months; HR 0.4; P = 0.009) and OS (16.6 vs 11.6 months; HR 0.5; P = 0.15), while this was not the case for BRAF wild-type patients. Follow-up LBs were obtained from 51 patients. Patients converting from BRAF V600E mutant to a BRAF V600 wild-type status (36%, N = 18) had a superior PFS (8.6 vs 2.3 months; P = 0.0002) and OS (17.4 vs 5.1 months; P < 0.0001) compared to patients with stable or increased mutational allele frequency (12%, N = 6). Those patients also achieved a significantly greater disease control rate (89% vs 20%; P = 0.008). In conclusion, LB evaluating ctDNA is informative and may help to guide treatment in patients with BRAF V600E-mutated mCRC.

Molecular characteristics, clinical significance and cancer‑immune interactions of pyroptosis‑related genes in colorectal cancer

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a malignant tumor with poor prognosis. Pyroptosis is a newly discovered type of programmed cell death that is typically accompanied by a strong inflammatory response. Accumulating evidence suggests that pyroptosis-related genes (PRGs) may have important roles in the development of malignant tumors. However, the association between PRG expression and clinical outcomes in CRC remain unclear. In the present study, the genetic variations and transcriptional patterns of 52 PRGs were comprehensively analyzed using cohorts from The Cancer Genome Atlas and Gene Expression Omnibus and the mRNA expression levels of 7 PRGs in collected CRC samples were validated using reverse transcription-quantitative PCR. Using LASSO-Cox analysis, a PRG score was then generated and the relationship between the PRG score and prognosis, immune cell infiltration and drug sensitivity in CRC was uncovered. In the present study, the mutation and expression patterns of PRGs were analyzed and it was found that these genes were differentially expressed in CRC tissues compared with normal tissues. Based on the expression patterns of the PRGs, patients with CRC were divided into two subtypes (cluster A and B), of which cluster B had an improved prognosis and a higher abundance of immune cells. Next, differentially expressed genes between clusters A and B were identified and a PRG risk score closely related to the prognosis of CRC was constructed. Then, a nomogram for evaluating the overall survival of patients was constructed. Furthermore, a low PRG risk score was characterized by immune activation and closely related to the microsatellite instability-high pattern. Additionally, the PRG risk score was notably correlated with drug sensitivity. In conclusion, the mutation and expression characteristics of PRGs in CRC were comprehensively analyzed and a prognostic PRG signature was constructed in the present study. This signature may predict immune cell infiltration and therapeutic response in CRC, providing new insights into the prognosis and treatment of CRC.

Assessment of the quality of life in metastatic colorectal cancer patients with KRAS gene mutant: a case-control study

BACKGROUND

The mutation of the KRAS (Kirsten rat sarcoma virus) gene is a prevalent genetic alteration in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). According to previous research, this mutation significantly affects clinical outcomes and quality of life (QOL). This research investigated the association between KRAS mutant status and various aspects of QOL in mCRC patients.

METHODS

This case-control study involved 90 admitted patients with mCRC. The patients were either mCRC with positive KRAS mutants (case group) or those without the mutation (control group). The KRAS mutation status of each patient was determined using standard molecular testing. The QOL was evaluated through validated questionnaires from the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), including QLQ-C30 and the QLQ-CR29 questionnaire for colorectal cancer patients. Differences in QOL between the groups and the association of QOL with the odds of KRAS mutation were analyzed using appropriate statistical tests.

RESULTS

Patients in the wild-type KRAS group had significantly higher scores on the global health status (GHS) of the QLQ-C30 scale compared to those with a KRAS mutation [(64.26 ± 4.63 vs. 49.63 ± 4, crude; p = 0.019, adjusted; p = 0.024). The mean score of the social functioning scale of the KRAS mutation group was significantly higher than the wild-type [(40 ± 5.84 vs. 24.81 ± 4.39, crude; p = 0.040, adjusted; p = 0.021)]. Based on the QLQ-CR29 questionnaire, average QOL scores were suboptimal for both groups but insignificant. Further, both crude and adjusted analyses showed that KRAS mutation odds were significantly linked to improved social functioning [(crude; OR = 1.013; P = 0.044), (adjusted; OR = 1.017; P = 0.019)] and negatively associated with GHS [(crude; OR = 0.983; P = 0.022), (adjusted; OR = 0.982; P = 0.022)].

CONCLUSION

The study revealed a low QOL in mCRC, a notable difference in social functioning, and the GHS among patients with and without mutations. Further research is needed to develop targeted interventions to enhance QOL in patients with KRAS mutation.

BRAF V600E and Non-V600E Mutations in RAS Wild-Type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Prognostic and Therapeutic Insights from a Nationwide, Multicenter, Observational Study (J-BROS)

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

BRAF mutations occur in 5-10% of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) cases, but their implications for prognosis and optimal treatment remain unclear.

METHODS

This multicenter, prospective observational study analyzed 377 RAS wild-type cases from 511 patients across 32 centers, using PCR-based methods.

RESULTS

BRAF mutations were identified in 21% (79/377) of cases, predominantly V600E (89.9%) with a minority of non-V600E (10.1%). Microsatellite instability (MSI) testing revealed MSI-high in 11.3%, exclusively among V600E cases. V600E mutations were linked to right-sided tumors, poor differentiation, and elevated CA19-9 levels. Median survival was significantly lower in V600E cases compared to BRAF wild-type (12.4 vs. 37.5 months, HR 3.25, p < 0.001) and marginally lower non-V600E cases (12.4 vs. 34.7 months, HR 0.61, p = 0.057). Chemotherapy regimens (doublet vs. triplet) and targeted treatments (bevacizumab vs. anti-EGFR) showed no significant survival differences in V600E patients. Similarly, RAS/BRAF wild-type patients had comparable survival with bevacizumab versus anti-EGFR, even for left-sided tumors.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings highlight distinct clinical and prognostic profiles for BRAF V600E and non-V600E mutations, while treatment choice appears to have limited impact on survival in these subgroups or RAS/BRAF wild-type cases.

Localized Drug Delivery in Different Gastrointestinal Cancers: Navigating Challenges and Advancing Nanotechnological Solutions

Different types of cancers affect the gastrointestinal tract (GIT), starting from the oral cavity and extending to the colon. In general, most of the current research focuses on the systemic delivery of the therapeutic agents, which leads to undesired side effects and a limited enhancement in the therapeutic outcomes. As a result, localized delivery within gastrointestinal (GI) cancers is favorable in overcoming these limitations. However, the localized delivery via oral administration faces many challenges related to the complex structure of GIT (varied pH levels and transit times) as well as the harsh environment within tumor cells (hypoxia, efflux pumps, and acidity). To overcome these obstacles, nano-drug delivery systems (NDDs) have been designed and proved their potential by exploiting these challenges in favor of offering a specific delivery to the desired target. The current review begins with an overview of different GI cancers and their impact globally. Then, it discusses the current treatment approaches and their corresponding limitations. Additionally, the different challenges associated with localized drug delivery for GI cancers are summarized. Finally, the review discusses in detail the recent therapeutic and diagnostic applications of NDDs that have been conducted in oral, esophageal, gastric, colon, and liver cancers, aiming to offer valuable insights into the current and future state of utilizing NDDs for the local treatment of GI cancers.

Management of metastatic colorectal cancer: consensus in the Gulf Cooperation Council countries

Colorectal cancer (CRC) represents a major public health challenge globally, particularly in the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries, where it is identified as the second most prevalent form of cancer. Despite advancements in management strategies, tailored guidelines specific to the Gulf region are lacking. This paper presents consensus recommendations developed by a panel of experts from the GCC countries to address this gap. The guidelines cover epidemiology, screening, biomarkers, and treatment strategies for metastatic CRC. Treatment guidelines emphasize tailored approaches based on tumor characteristics, including sidedness and molecular profiles. Furthermore, the importance of maintenance therapy and emerging biomarkers are discussed. These guidelines aim to improve CRC management and outcomes in the Gulf region.

Trilaciclib prior to FOLFOXIRI/bevacizumab for patients with untreated metastatic colorectal cancer: phase 3 PRESERVE 1 trial

BACKGROUND

In metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), improvements in survival from combining leucovorin/fluorouracil/oxaliplatin/irinotecan (FOLFOXIRI) with bevacizumab have come at the risk of increased rates of high-grade toxicities. Trilaciclib is indicated to decrease the incidence of chemotherapy-induced myelosuppression in patients receiving standard-of-care chemotherapy for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer.

METHODS

Patients with untreated mCRC were randomly assigned 1:1 to trilaciclib (n = 164) or placebo (n = 162) prior to FOLFOXIRI/bevacizumab for up to 12 cycles (induction), followed by trilaciclib or placebo prior to fluorouracil/leucovorin/bevacizumab (maintenance). Co-primary endpoints were duration of severe (grade 4) neutropenia (DSN) in cycles 1-4 and occurrence of severe neutropenia (SN) during induction. Secondary endpoints included antitumor efficacy, survival, and safety.

RESULTS

The study met its co-primary endpoints. Administering trilaciclib prior to FOLFOXIRI/bevacizumab resulted in significant reductions in DSN in cycles 1-4 vs placebo (mean, 0.1 vs 1.3 days; P < .001) and occurrence of SN during induction (1.3% vs 19.7%; adjusted relative risk [96% CI] = 0.07 [0.0 to 0.3]; P < .001). Grade 3/4 adverse events, including neutropenia, diarrhea, and leukopenia, were less frequent with trilaciclib vs placebo (64.8% vs 73.1%). Trilaciclib was associated with fewer chemotherapy dose reductions and delays and with reduced administration of supportive therapies, compared with placebo. Objective response rate (41.6% vs 57.1%; P = .009) and median progression-free survival (10.3 vs 13.1 months; P < .001) were significantly lower with trilaciclib vs placebo.

CONCLUSIONS

Administering trilaciclib prior to FOLFOXIRI/bevacizumab protected the neutrophil lineage from the effects of chemotherapy-induced myelosuppression. However, antitumor efficacy endpoints favored placebo.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04607668.

Value of ctDNA in surveillance of adjuvant chemosensitivity and regimen adjustment in stage III colon cancer: a protocol for phase II multicentre randomised controlled trial (REVISE trial)

INTRODUCTION

The standard of care for stage III colon cancer is 3 or 6 months of double-drug regimen chemotherapy following radical surgery. However, patients with positive circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) exhibit a high risk of recurrence risk even if they receive standard adjuvant chemotherapy. The potential benefit of intensified adjuvant chemotherapy, oxaliplatin, irinotecan, leucovorin and fluoropyrimidine (FOLFOXIRI), for ctDNA-positive patients remains to be elucidated.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This multicentre phase II randomised controlled trial aims to investigate the utility of ctDNA in monitoring chemosensitivity and to preliminarily assess whether intensified chemotherapy with FOLFOXIRI can increase ctDNA clearance and improve survival outcomes. A total of 60 eligible patients with stage III colon cancer exhibiting postoperatively positive ctDNA before and after two cycles of oxaliplatin and capecitabine (XELOX) will be randomly assigned to continue five additional cycles of XELOX (control arm) or switch to eight cycles of FOLFOXIRI (experimental arm). This sequential approach is designed to escalate treatment for patients with persistent ctDNA positivity while avoiding overtreatment in those who may respond well to standard chemotherapy. The primary endpoint is the change in ctDNA concentration, defined as the difference between the ctDNA concentration measured after two cycles of XELOX and after the completion or termination of chemotherapy. Secondary endpoints include the ctDNA clearance rate, 2-year disease-free survival, distant metastasis-free survival, chemotherapy-related side effects and quality of life.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This trial has been approved by the Ethics Committee of the West China Hospital, Sichuan University (approval number: 20231998). The findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and presentations at scientific conferences.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06242418, registered on 27 January 2024).

A Narrative Review of the Role of Immunotherapy in Metastatic Carcinoma of the Colon Harboring a BRAF Mutation

Patients affected by metastatic carcinoma of the colon/rectum (mCRC) harboring mutations in the BRAF gene (MBRAF) respond poorly to conventional therapy and have a prognosis worse than that of patients without mutations. Despite the promising outcomes of targeted therapy utilizing multi-targeted inhibition of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling system, the therapeutic efficacy, especially for the microsatellite stable/DNA proficient mismatch repair (MSS/PMMR) subtype, remains inadequate. Patients with MBRAF/mCRC and high microsatellite instability or DNA deficient mismatch repair (MSI-H/DMMR) exhibit a substantial tumor mutation burden, suggesting a high probability of response to immunotherapy. It is widely acknowledged that MSS/pMMR/mCRC is an immunologically "cold" malignancy that exhibits resistance to immunotherapy. The integration of targeted therapy and immunotherapy may enhance clinical outcomes in patients with MBRAF/mCRC. Efforts to enhance outcomes are exclusively focused on MSS/DMMR-BRAF mutant cancers, which constitute the largest proportion. This review evaluates the clinical efficacy and advancement of novel immune checkpoint blockade therapies for MSI-H/DMMR and MSS/PMMR BRAF mutant mCRC. We examine potential indicators in the tumor immune milieu for forecasting immunotherapeutic response in BRAF mutant mCRC.

Evaluating Combinations of Biological and Clinicopathologic Factors Linked to Poor Outcomes in Resected Colorectal Liver Metastasis: An External Validation Study

BACKGROUND

Recent studies have suggested that certain combinations of KRAS or BRAF biomarkers with clinical factors are associated with poor outcomes and may indicate that surgery could be "biologically" futile in otherwise technically resectable colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM). However, these combinations have yet to be validated through external studies.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted a systematic search to identify these studies. The overall survival (OS) of patients with these combinations was evaluated in a cohort of patients treated at 11 tertiary centers. Additionally, the study investigated whether using high-risk KRAS point mutations in these combinations could be associated with particularly poor outcomes.

RESULTS

The recommendations of four studies were validated in 1661 patients. The first three studies utilized KRAS, and their validation showed the following median and 5-year OS: (1) 30 months and 16.9%, (2) 24.3 months and 21.6%, and (3) 46.8 months and 44.4%, respectively. When analyzing only patients with high-risk KRAS mutations, median and 5-year OS decreased to: (1) 26.2 months and 0%, (2) 22.3 months and 15.1%, and (3) not reached and 44.9%, respectively. The fourth study utilized BRAF, and its validation showed a median OS of 10.4 months, with no survivors beyond 21 months.

CONCLUSION

The combinations of biomarkers and clinical factors proposed to render surgery for CRLM futile, as presented in studies 1 (KRAS high-risk mutations) and 4, appear justified. In these studies, there were no long-term survivors, and survival was similar to that of historic cohorts with similar mutational profiles that received systemic therapies alone for unresectable disease.

Panitumumab plus 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid or 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid alone as maintenance therapy in RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer (PanaMa, AIO KRK 0212): final efficacy analysis of a randomised, open-label, phase 2 trial

Background

The PanaMa trial aimed to compare the efficacy of 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid (FU/FA) ± panitumumab maintenance in untreated RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients.

Methods

In this final phase 2 trial analysis, adult mCRC patients responding to six cycles of FU/FA, oxaliplatin and panitumumab were randomized (1:1, open-label) to maintenance of either FU/FA + panitumumab or FU/FA alone. The primary endpoint was superiority of progression-free survival of maintenance (PFS; time from random assignment to progression/death) in favour of FU/FA + panitumumab. Secondary endpoints included PFS of re-induction (PFS re-ind.), time to failure of strategy (TFS) and overall survival (OS). The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01991873).

Findings

In 248 patients of the Full Analysis Set recruited between May 2014 and February 2021, with a median observation of 64.0 (range 12.5-86.3) months and 59.7 (range 3.7-97.3) months in the treatment arms, 230 events for PFS (92.7%) and 196 events for OS (79.0%) were recorded. Adding panitumumab to FU/FA resulted in significantly longer PFS (8.8 versus 5.8 months, HR = 0.73 (95% CI 0.56-0.94), P = 0.015), shorter PFS re-ind. (4.1 versus 7.4 months, HR = 1.93 (95% CI 1.33-2.82), P < 0.001), comparable TFS (17.1 versus 15.7 months, HR = 0.98 (95% CI 0.68-1.42), P = 0.92) and numerically longer OS (29.9 versus 24.7 months, HR = 0.85 (95% CI 0.64-1.12), P = 0.24). The most frequent adverse event (AE) grade ≥3 was rash (FU/FA + panitumumab: n = 15, 12.0%, FU/FA: n = 17, 6.9%). 141 patients (37.3%) experienced at least one serious AE One treatment-related death occurred (neutropenic sepsis, FU/FA).

Interpretation

Panitumumab plus FU/FA might be considered a standard of care maintenance regimen since a potential re-induction therapy with panitumumab cannot be guaranteed at the time of maintenance treatment decision.

Funding

Amgen.

Decision-Making for Ablation of Colorectal Liver Oligometastases Patients: A 10-Year Retrospective Study of Survival Outcomes Based on Right-Versus Left-Sided Primary Tumor Location

ObjectiveTo develop a prognostic model for optimizing management of colorectal liver oligometastases (CLOM) patients with different primary tumor locations who underwent thermal ablation (TA).Materials and MethodsThe reporting of this retrospective study conforms to STROBE guidelines. A total of 525 CLOM patients who underwent TA from 3 hospitals between 2011 and 2021 were enrolled. Firstly, intra and extrahepatic disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) for CLOM patients with different primary tumor locations were analyzed. Then, cox regression models were used to identify independent factors predicting OS. Finally, a prognostic score was developed to identify CLOM patients benefiting from TA. All patient details were de-identified.ResultsA total of 423 eligible patients were identified, with 762 CLOM (121 male, median age 59 years) and a median follow-up of 45.8 (IQR, 7.3-114.8) months. Independent predictors of OS were identified, including multiple liver metastases (P = .0085), right-sided colon cancer (P = .0210), tumor size ≥2 cm (P = .0273), and lymph node metastasis of primary colorectal cancer (P = .0302), termed as the "MRSL" score. On the basis of the best separation of MRSL score, patients were divided into high-risk (cutoff value ≥8) and low-risk groups (cutoff value <8). Further stratified analysis indicated that right-sided CLOM patients had shorter OS than left-sided patients in the high-risk group (54.9 vs 92.5 months, P = .0156). However, no significant difference in OS was observed between right-sided and left-sided CLOM patients in the low-risk group (97.7 vs 102.2 months, P = .28).ConclusionThe MRSL score-based model helps in selecting potential right-sided CLOM patients who benefit from TA.

Relative dose intensity of first-line triplet chemotherapy in metastatic colorectal cancer

PURPOSE

Relative dose intensity (RDI) is a measurement of chemotherapy (CT) dose defined as the actual dose received divided by the standard calculated dose during a set period. The study objective was to assess the impact of a RDI ≥ 80% on response and survival of patients treated in first line CT by FOLFOXIRI or FOLFIRINOX ± Bevacizumab (BV) for an unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

It was a retrospective, non-interventional, multicenter study calculating RDI from the first cycles of CT to the first CT-scan evaluation (CT-scan1). Objective response and disease control rates (ORR and DCR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared between patients with RDI ≥ 80% and <80% and results were adjusted for age, gender, ECOG, tumor location, number of metastatic sites, RAS and BRAF status, the CT regimen, the use of BV, the delay from C1 to CT scan1.

RESULTS

Among 152 screened patients, 100 met inclusion criteria, with a mean (± standard deviation) age at 59.0 (± 10.7) years. The ECOG performance status was 0-1 in 96 (96%) patients; metastases were synchronous in 95 (95%), RAS and BRAF were mutated in 60 (60%) and 22 (22%), respectively. ORR was observed in 51 (51%) at CT-scan1 with median PFS and OS of 10.5 and 21.9 months, respectively. A RDI ≥ 80% was observed in 44 (44%) patients without impact on ORR (ORa: 1.04, 95% CI: 0.37 to 2.89, p = 0.94) but was significantly associated to improved PFS and OS with HRa 0.50 (95%CI: 0.29 to 0.87, p = 0.013) and 0.52 (95% CI: 0.29 to 0.91, p = 0.023), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest a low level of FOLFOXIRI or FOLFIRINOX +/- BV exposure in first-line mCRC is associated with a significant trend on PFS and OS.

Induction triplet chemotherapy in patients with rectal adenocarcinoma and synchronous metastases, an AGEO-FFCD study

AIM OF THE STUDY

The management of synchronous metastatic rectal cancer (SMRC) is complex and multimodal, involving chemotherapy, surgery and/or radiotherapy. The aim of this study was firstly to confirm the efficacy of the induction FOLFIRINOX, and secondly to evaluate the different therapeutic strategies and outcomes of patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This French study combined data from a prospective FFCD trial and a multicenter cohort. Patients included had SMRC and had undergone induction triplet chemotherapy. Two groups of patients were defined according to the resectability of metastases at baseline: resectable (Res) and unresectable (URes). The primary endpoint was the objective response rate.

RESULTS

146 patients were included in 16 French centers and 65 patients in the FFCD1102 trial. In overall population the median age of patients was 59 years, 86% of tumors were of the lower or middle rectum, 33% were well-differentiated, 53% were RAS mutated and 7% BRAF mutated. Triplet induction was associated with 80% of objective response and 92% of disease control. After the induction phase, 69% and 48% of patients of Res and URes groups underwent rectal surgery, and secondary metastases resection was done in 79% and 39% of patients, respectively. Median overall survival (OS) for Res was 56.3 months (95% CI: 22.54-NA). Median OS for URes who had or not secondary metastases resection were 45.1 months (95% CI: 39.89-NA) and 21.1 months (95% CI 17.31-27.1), respectively. Patients with BRAF mutated tumors were more likely to have unresectable disease, and had worse survivals than the patients with RAS mutated or RAS/BRAF wild-type.

CONCLUSION

Triplet induction chemotherapy is a treatment of choice in selected patients with SMRC, allowing to adapt the therapeutic strategy to the response and invasiveness of the various sites.

STRUCTURED ABSTRACT

The management of metastatic rectal cancer is essentially based on three main therapeutic approaches: surgery, radiotherapy/chemoradiotherapy and chemotherapy. Induction triplet chemotherapy appears as a good choice for fit and young patients. It allows to adapt the therapeutic strategy to the response and invasiveness of the various sites. In this study dedicated to patients undergoing treatment for rectal cancer with synchronous metastases, FOLFIRINOX-based induction chemotherapy was associated with objective response rate of 77% and disease control rate of 92%. These results are similar with those of the FFCD 1102 trial and confirm the efficacy of induction chemotherapy with FOLFIRINOX with or without targeted therapy in these patients in daily routine practice. Surgery for metastases is a key factor in determining patient's outcome and triplet induction chemotherapy, associated with high response rates, enables a significant percentage of patients to undergo surgery and appears therefore to be a treatment of choice, particularly for patients whose disease is unresectable at baseline.

Advances in pharmacotherapy for the treatment of peritoneal metastases from colorectal cancer

INTRODUCTION

Patients with peritoneal metastasis (PM) from colorectal cancer (CRC) typically have a poor prognosis with historically few treatment options. Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) is the mainstay of treatment to remove macrometastases into the peritoneum, but residual micrometastases are often left behind. Systemic chemotherapy remains a cornerstone of treatment for micrometastases, but intraperitoneal therapy offers advantages including higher local dose concentration with fewer systemic side effects from treatment.

AREAS COVERED

This review covers advancements in the routes and types of pharmacotherapies for PM in CRC.

EXPERT OPINION

More evidence is needed to justify HIPEC with CRS as the standard of care treatment modality for patients with resectable PM in CRC. New therapies such as oncolytic viruses, biologics, and small-molecule inhibitors may become additional treatment modalities for PM.

Factors Influencing the Duration of Maintenance Therapy in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

Metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is mainly treated with 5-Fluoro-Uracil (5-FU), Oxaliplatin and Irinotecan chemotherapies and anti-Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) or anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) targeted therapies. Due to chemotherapy-related toxicity, patients receive induction treatment to achieve tumour response followed by maintenance therapy with less cytotoxic molecules or a chemotherapy-free interval to reduce chemotherapy-related toxicity. In this study, the aim was to determine the patient, cancer and treatment factors that influence the duration of maintenance therapy (DMT).

METHODS

We collected retrospective data on a cohort of 133 patients treated at the Centre Georges François Leclerc (CGFL) cancer centre in Dijon between March 2014 and June 2022. Patients had unresectable or potentially resectable diseases. They received first-line induction treatment with chemotherapy and/or targeted therapy and maintenance treatment, defined as the interruption of at least one chemotherapy agent.

RESULTS

In the multivariate analysis, age (HR: 1.02, 95% CI 1.00-1.04, p = 0.031), N2 nodal status (HR: 1.78, 95% CI 1.09-2.89, p = 0.021) and the presence of peritoneal metastases (HR: 2.05, 95% CI 1.25-3.36, p = 0.004), as well as baseline carcino-embryonic antigen (CEA) level (HR: 1.10, 95% CI 1.00-1.20, p = 0.052), were significantly associated to poor DMT. Local treatment of liver metastases also significantly reduced the DMT (HR: 0.49, 95% CI 0.28-0.86, p = 0.013). In our cohort, induction triplet chemotherapy significantly increased the CEA delta (70% vs. 44%, p = 0.047) compared to doublet chemotherapy and led to a higher rate of liver surgery (40% vs. 21%, p = 0.014) and a trend for a higher rate of local treatment of metastases (62% vs. 45%, p = 0.059).

CONCLUSIONS

Duration of maintenance therapy is determined by the initial patient and colorectal cancer characteristics. However, it is significantly increased by local treatment of liver metastases. By reducing the tumour burden, a triplet induction chemotherapy regimen increases the rate of liver metastase resection.

Genetic and microenvironmental evolution of colorectal liver metastases under chemotherapy

Drug resistance limits the efficacy of chemotherapy for colorectal cancer liver metastasis (CRLM). However, the evolution of CRLM during drug treatment remains poorly elucidated. Multi-omics and treatment response data from 115 samples of 49 patients with CRLM undergoing bevacizumab (BVZ)-based chemotherapy show little difference in genomic alterations in 92% of cases, while remarkable differences are observed at the transcriptomic level. By decoupling intrinsic and acquired resistance, we find that hepatocyte and myeloid cell infiltration contribute to 38.5% and 23.1% of acquired resistance, respectively. Importantly, SMAD4 mutations and chr20q copy-number gain are associated with intrinsic chemoresistance. Gene interference experiments suggest that SMAD4R361H/C mutations confer BVZ and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) resistance through STAT3 signaling. Notably, supplementing BVZ and 5-FU with the STAT3 inhibitor GB201 restores therapeutic efficacy in SMAD4R361H/C cancer cells. Our study uncovers the evolutionary dynamics of CRLM and its microenvironment during treatment and offers strategies to overcome drug resistance.

AGITG MONARCC: A Randomized Phase 2 Study of Panitumumab Monotherapy and Panitumumab Plus 5-Fluorouracil as First-Line Therapy for Older Patients With RAS and BRAF Wild Type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. A Study by the Australasian Gastro-Intestinal Trials Group (AGITG)

BACKGROUND

Panitumumab (pan) plus chemotherapy is a preferred first-line therapy for unresectable RAS and BRAF wild type metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Older patients may not be suitable for combination regimens. We investigated 2 lower intensity pan-containing regimens.

METHODS

Prospective, noncomparative, randomized (1:1) phase 2 study of pan alone (Arm A) or pan plus FU (Arm B). Previously untreated mCRC were ≥70 years; RAS/BRAF wild type.

PRIMARY ENDPOINT

6-month progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included: overall survival (OS), response rate (RR), feasibility of geriatric assessments and overall treatment utility (OTU)-a composite measure based on radiological response, clinical progress, toxicity and patient-reported treatment worth. Planned sample size was 40 patients per arm.

RESULTS

36 patients (Arm A n = 19, Arm B n = 17) were randomized between June 2018 and June 2021. Median age was 79 and 80 years respectively. 6-month PFS 63% (95% CI 38%-80%) arm A 82% (95%CI 55%-94%) Arm B. Median OS 21 months Arm A (95%CI 13-31) 28 (95%CI 14-39) months Arm B. RR 47% and 65% Arms A and B respectively. Baseline comprehensive geriatric assessments were completed in >80% of patients. At week 16, OTU was categorized as good in 92% (Arm A) and 90% (Arm B). No unexpected adverse events were seen.

CONCLUSIONS

Six-month PFS in both arms was consistent with that achieved with FU/bev, whilst the rate was numerically higher for Arm B. Baseline comprehensive geriatric assessments were feasible and OTU was high. Both treatment arms might be suitable in appropriately selected patients.

Real-World Data of Patients with BRAF V600E-Mutated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Treated with Trifluridine/Tipiracil

BACKGROUND

For patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD-TPI) has been associated with a significant improvement in overall survival (OS). However, data are lacking regarding the activity of FTD-TPI in patients with BRAF-mutated mCRC.

METHODS

This retrospective, multicenter, international cohort included patients with BRAF-mutated mCRC treated with FTD-TPI in a real-life setting in Spain and Italy. Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier methods and Cox proportional hazard models and according to established prognostic groups: good prognosis characteristics (GPC; < 3 metastatic sites and time from metastases to FTD-TPI ≥ 18 months) and poor prognosis characteristics (PPC; ≥ 3 metastatic sites or time from metastases to FTD-TPI < 18 months).

RESULTS

In the 26 patients included, the median age was 61 years, 13 (50%) were female, and 20 (77%) had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 1. Fourteen (56%) patients had right-sided tumors, six (23%) had microsatellite instability tumors, and thirteen (50%) had liver metastases. Median progression-free survival was 2.3 months (95% CI 2.0-3.2), and median OS (mOS) was 6.6 months (95% CI 4.4-12.0). mOS was 7.6 vs. 4.2 months (HR 1.64, 95% CI 0.65-4.10, p = 0.3) for GPC and PPC patients, respectively. Exploratory analyses identified ECOG as the only feature associated with survival. The most frequent grade 3-4 adverse events were neutropenia (8%), anemia (8%), and asthenia (4%).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with BRAF mutant mCRC achieved modest benefits with FTD-TPI; however, patients with GPC and ECOG 0 achieved longer OS compared with those with PPC or ECOG 1-2, thus warranting further exploration in prospective cohorts.

Alternating modified CAPOX/CAPIRI plus bevacizumab in untreated unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer: a phase 2 trial

Previous studies showed encouraging efficacy of alternating FOLFOX/FOLFIRI for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). This phase 2 trial (NCT04324476) aimed to evaluate efficacy and safety of alternating modified CAPOX (capecitabine and oxaliplatin)/modified CAPIRI (capecitabine and irinotecan) plus bevacizumab (anti-VEGF-A antibody) in untreated unresectable mCRC. Induction treatment included capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 bid D2-8 and D16-22, oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 D1, irinotecan 150 mg/m2 D15, and bevacizumab 5 mg/kg D1 and 15 for 28-day cycles (up to six cycles). Capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 bid D2-15 and bevacizumab 7.5 mg/kg D1 for 21-day cycles were used as maintenance treatment. 52 patients were included. Median follow-up was 25.0 months. Median progression-free survival (PFS; the primary endpoint) was 11.0 months (95% CI 9.0-12.4). Subgroup analyses showed patients with neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio<5 or RAS wild-type disease had longer PFS (both P < 0.05). Objective response and disease control were obtained in 38 (73%; 95% CI 59%-84%) and 49 (94%; 95% CI 84%-99%), respectively. Mean depth of response, conversion and no evidence of disease rates were 46.0% ± 26.3%, 23% and 19%, respectively. Median overall survival was 28.1 months (18.4-34.0). Grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events (TRAE) occurred in 17 (33%) patients. No treatment-related death was reported. The most common grade 3-4 TRAE were hypertension (13 [25%]), neutrophil count decreased (three [6%]), and hand-foot syndrome (two [4%]). In addition, grade 3-4 TRAE of diarrhea reported in one [2%] patient and no grade 3-4 peripheral neuropathy occurred. Thus, alternating modified CAPOX/CAPIRI plus bevacizumab had promising efficacy and acceptable safety. The regimen may be a novel option for untreated unresectable mCRC.

Clinical Benefits and Utility of Pretherapeutic DPYD and UGT1A1 Testing in Gastrointestinal Cancer: A Secondary Analysis of the PREPARE Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

To date, the clinical benefit and utility of implementing a DPYD/UGT1A1 pharmacogenetic-informed therapy with fluoropyrimidines and/or irinotecan have not been prospectively investigated.

Objective

To examine clinically relevant toxic effects, hospitalizations, and related costs while preserving treatment intensity and efficacy outcomes in patients with gastrointestinal cancer.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This nonprespecified secondary analysis stems from Pre-Emptive Pharmacogenomic Testing for Preventing Adverse Drug Reactions (PREPARE), a multicenter, controlled, open, block-randomized, crossover implementation trial conducted from March 7, 2017, to June 30, 2020, and includes data from Italy according to a sequential study design. The study population included 563 patients (intervention, 252; control [standard of care], 311) with gastrointestinal cancer (age ≥18 years) who were eligible for fluoropyrimidine and/or irinotecan treatment. Data analysis for the present study was performed from May 27 to October 10, 2024.

Interventions

Participants with actionable variants (DPYD*2A, DPYD*13, .DPYD c.2846A>T, and DPYD c.1236G>A for fluoropyrimidines, and UGT1A1*28, UGT1A1*6, and UGT1A1*27 for irinotecan) received drug or dose adjustments based on Dutch Pharmacogenetics Working Group recommendations.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome was clinically relevant toxic effects (National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grade ≥4 hematologic, grade ≥3 nonhematologic, or causing hospitalization, fluoropyrimidines and/or irinotecan causally related). Secondary outcomes included hospitalization rates, toxic effect management costs, intensity of treatment, quality-adjusted life-years, and 3-year overall survival.

Results

Overall, 1232 patients were enrolled in Italy, with 563 included in this analysis (317 [56.3%] men; median age, 68.0 [IQR, 60.0-75.0] years). In the intervention arm, carriers of any actionable genotype exhibited a 90% lower risk of clinically relevant toxic effects compared with the control arm (odds ratio, 0.1; 95% CI, 0.0-0.8; P = .04). They also presented higher toxic effect management costs per patient ($4159; 95% CI, $1510-$6810) compared with patients in the intervention arm ($26; 95% CI, 0-$312) (P = .004) and a higher rate of hospitalization (34.8% vs 11.8%; P = .12). The differences were not significant among all patients. Three-year overall survival did not differ significantly between arms, while quality-adjusted life-years significantly improved in the intervention arm. The pharmacogenetics-informed approach did not manifest a detrimental effect on treatment intensity in actionable genotype carriers.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this secondary analysis of PREPARE, pretreatment application of DPYD- and UGT1A1-guided treatment appeared to increase safety and reduce hospitalizations and related costs in patients with gastrointestinal cancer. Clinical benefit did not appear to be affected.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03093818.

Real-world outcomes of FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: the JSCCR-TRIPON study

BACKGROUND

FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab is a standard first-line chemotherapy for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). However, due to the severe toxicities, this regimen is not widely used. There is limited data on the real-world efficacy and safety.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of clinical data from mCRC patients who received FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab as first-line chemotherapy at 31 institutions. The initial dose was standardized according to the TRIBE regimen. Induction therapy was defined as a combination of oxaliplatin, irinotecan, and fluorouracil.

RESULTS

Out of 104 patients who met the criteria, the median age was 58 years (range, 16-72). 81% of patients had an eastern cooperative oncology group performance status (PS) of 0. An initial dose reduction was observed in 63% of patients. The median number of preplanned induction therapy cycles was 12 (range, 4-12). The completion of scheduled induction therapy cycles was observed in 45% of patients, with treatment-related toxicities being the main reason for discontinuation (63%). The median progression-free survival and overall survival were 12.8 months (95% CI, 10.6-15.0) and 27.9 months (95% CI 21.6-34.2), respectively. The objective response rate and disease control rate were 63.7% and 98.9%, respectively. The R0 resection rate was 21.2%. The main grade 3 or higher toxicities were neutropenia (51%), febrile neutropenia (10%), and nausea/vomiting (5%). No treatment-related deaths were observed.

CONCLUSION

In a real-world clinical setting, FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab demonstrated efficacy and safety comparable to previous clinical trials.

Origin, development and therapy of colorectal cancer from the perspective of a biologist and an oncologist

The intestinal epithelium, a rapidly renewing tissue, is characterized by a continuous cell turnover that occurs through a well-coordinated process of cell proliferation and differentiation. This dynamic is crucial for the long-term function of the gastrointestinal tract. Disruption of this process can lead to colorectal carcinoma, a common malignancy worldwide. The first part of the review focuses on the cellular composition of the epithelium and the molecular mechanisms that control its functions, and describes the pathways that lead to epithelial transformation and tumor progression. This forms the basis for understanding the development and progression of advanced colorectal cancer. The second part deals with current therapeutic approaches and presents the latest treatment options, ongoing clinical trials and new drugs. In addition, the biological and medical perspectives of the adverse effects of therapies and models of regeneration of the intestinal epithelium are highlighted and, finally, future treatment options are discussed.

VIC Regimen (Vemurafenib/Irinotecan/Cetuximab) Versus Bevacizumab Plus Chemotherapy as First-Line Treatment for BRAF V600E-Mutated Unresectable or Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in Asian Patients: A Prospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Colorectal cancers (CRC) with BRAF V600E mutation exhibit limited chemotherapy response and a poor prognosis. Safety and efficacy of the VIC (Vemurafenib/Irinotecan/Cetuximab) regimen in the first-line setting for patients with BRAF V600E-mutated CRC remain undetermined.

METHODS

In the prospective cohort study, the untreated, BRAF V600E-mutated, unresectable or metastatic CRC patients were enrolled. The VIC regimen and bevacizumab plus chemotherapy were compared in the first-line setting. The objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), conversion resection rate, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were evaluated.

RESULTS

In the intent-to-treat analysis, 38 patients received VIC regimen and 40 received bevacizumab plus chemotherapy. The ORR and DCR in the VIC group were significantly higher than in the bevacizumab-therapy group (ORR: 63.2% vs. 37.5%, P = .025; DCR: 94.7% vs. 75.0%, P = .019). The VIC regimen significantly outperformed bevacizumab plus chemotherapy in both PFS (11.9 vs. 7.7 months; hazard ratio [HR] = 0.51, 95% CI, 0.30-0.87; P = .010) and OS (25.3 vs. 14.6 months; HR = 0.43, 95% CI, 0.22-0.82; P = .011). In the VIC group, the conversion resection rate for liver metastases was 34.8% (8 of 23 patients), and for unresectable local CRC it was 54.5% (6 of 11 patients). The adverse events rates of Grade 3 to 4 were 34.2% and 32.5% for the VIC regimen and bevacizumab plus chemotherapy respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Among Asian patients with BRAF V600E-mutated CRC, the VIC regimen showed favorable outcomes compared to bevacizumab plus chemotherapy in terms of tumor response and oncological survival, with a tolerable and manageable toxicity profile in the first-line setting.

An Evolving Landscape: New Therapies for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Substantial progress is being made in the development of novel therapies directed against colorectal cancer. The discovery of various molecular markers and advances in tumor profiling have facilitated the development of new targeted agents and immunotherapy. Not only have these drugs improved progression-free survival and even overall survival in some cases, but their related outcomes have also raised questions as to how to best combine or sequence therapies for even greater efficacy. Furthermore, we are beginning to understand how these combination therapies may yield for greater therapeutic response for patients with microsatellite stable colorectal cancer for which there is much need for improvement. In this article, we review recent trial data and explore the outcomes of various targeted therapies and immunotherapies for patient with advanced colorectal cancer.

Modified FOLFOXIRI plus cetuximab versus bevacizumab in RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer: a randomized phase II DEEPER trial

The clinical significance of FOLFOXIRI (5-FU, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan) plus anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody using cetuximab for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) remains controversial. We report results from a randomized phase 2 DEEPER trial (UMIN000018217, jRCTs061180022) to test the superiority of modified (m)-FOLFOXIRI plus weekly cetuximab over bevacizumab in patients with RAS wild-type (wt) mCRC. Primary endpoint was depth of response (DpR). Secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), early tumor shrinkage (ETS) at week 8, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), time to tumor growth (TTG), time to treatment failure (TTF), association between tumor shrinkage and prognosis, association between TTG and prognosis, R0 resection rate, and safety. In 359 enrolled patients with RAS wt mCRC, median DpR was significantly better in cetuximab (57.3% vs 46.0%, p = 0.0029); however, ORR, ETS, R0 resection rate, TTG, TTF, PFS and OS were similar between 2 treatments. There was a weak association between DpR and survival time in both treatments. The correlation between TTG and OS was slightly stronger in cetuximab. The post-hoc exploratory analysis showed that cetuximab produced greater PFS (15.3 vs 11.7 months; HR 0.68) and OS (53.6 vs 40.2 months; HR 0.54) in patients with left-sided and RAS/BRAF wt tumors. m-FOLFOXIRI plus cetuximab has clinical benefit for tumor shrinkage in RAS wt mCRC. The survival benefit for RAS/BRAF wt and left-sided mCRC needs further investigation.

Prognostic and Predictive Determinants of Colorectal Cancer: A Comprehensive Review

Colorectal cancer (CRC) remains a significant global health burden, necessitating a thorough understanding of prognostic and predictive factors to enhance patient outcomes. This systematic review aims to comprehensively evaluate prognostic and predictive determinants in CRC, encompassing both traditional and emerging biomarkers. A systematic search of major electronic databases was conducted to identify relevant studies published from 1995 up to 2024. Eligible articles were critically appraised, and data extraction was performed according to predefined criteria. The prognostic determinants examined included clinicopathological features such as tumor stage, grade, and lymph node involvement, as well as molecular biomarkers including RAS, BRAF, and MSI status. Predictive determinants encompassed biomarkers influencing response to targeted therapies and immunotherapy, such as HER2 and Immunoscore. The review also explores novel prognostic and predictive markers, including tumor microenvironment characteristics and liquid biopsy-based biomarkers. Synthesizing evidence from diverse studies, this review provides insights into the prognostic and predictive landscape of CRC, highlighting the potential clinical implications of identified determinants. Understanding the multifaceted nature of prognostic and predictive factors in CRC is imperative for the advancement of personalized treatment strategies and improvement of patient outcomes.

Clinicopathologic features and treatment efficacy of patients with BRAF V600E-mutated metastatic colorectal cancer: a multi-center real-world propensity score matching study

BACKGROUND

Patients with BRAF 600E mutated mCRC are associated with specific clinicopathological features and poor prognosis. The relative efficacy of first-line FOLFOXIRI triplet chemotherapy or doublet chemotherapy combined with bevacizumab in patients with BRAF 600E mutated mCRC remains controversial.

METHODS

BRAF V600E-mutated mCRC patients from 3 institutions were included. The clinicopathological characteristics of the enrolled patients were analyzed. Overall survival (OS) of patients was divided into 4 fractions, including 0-25%, 25-50%, 50-75%,75-100% by quartile method. Patients with OS ranging from 0 to 25% were defined as the poor prognosis group, and patients with OS ranging from 75 to 100% were defined as the good prognosis group. A propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was performed to balance the baseline characteristics of patients treated with doublet chemotherapy and triplet chemotherapy combined with bevacizumab. Survival and tumor response of the two regimens were evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 125 patients with BRAF V600E-mutated mCRC were enrolled. The median OS of BRAF V600E-mutated mCRC was 14.9 months and the median PFS of first-line therapy was 6.1 months. According to the multivariate analysis and the difference in baseline characteristics between the poor prognosis group and the good prognosis group, poor differentiation and liver metastasis were negative independent prognostic factors for OS in patientsx with BRAF V600E-mutated mCRC. Patients treated with first-line triplets had a longer OS than those treated with doublets both before PSM (17.4 months vs. 13.4 months, p = 0.022) and after PSM (17.4 months vs. 10.4 months, p = 0.004). There was no significant benefit between triplet-drug group and doublet-drug group for PFS, ORR and DCR. Subgroup analysis showed that patients in the triplet-drug group had a better prognosis with the following favorable factors: age ≤ 60 years old, PS score of 0-1, liver metastases and multiple organ metastases.

CONCLUSION

The overall prognosis of BRAF V600E mutant mCRC patients is poor. Poor differentiation and liver metastases were negative independent prognostic factors for OS. First-line triplet-drug therapy was associated with better OS, especially in patients with good physical condition and high tumor burden.

Transient 'NeoBRAF wild type' state in a patient with BRAFV600E mutant metastatic colorectal cancer

We report the case of a patient with a BRAFV600E mutant mCRC, with evidence of acquired 'NeoBRAF wild-type' (wt) state. The patient, longitudinally assessed by liquid biopsy, obtained a remarkable clinical outcome with a multimodal approach including surgery, systemic treatment and targeted therapy. In patients with newly diagnosed RAS and BRAFV600E mutant mCRC, longitudinal assessment with liquid biopsy is not routinely used in clinical practice. We report the case of a patient with a BRAFV600E mutant mCRC, with evidence of acquired 'neoBRAF wild-type' (wt) state. The patient obtained a remarkable clinical outcome and has been longitudinally assessed by liquid biopsy.

KRASG12D-Mutated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Clinical, Molecular, Immunologic, and Prognostic Features of a New Emerging Targeted Alteration

PURPOSE

KRASG12D mutation (mut) occurs in about 10%-12% of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Recently, novel KRASG12D inhibitors have been developed and are currently under investigation in phase I/II clinical trials in solid tumors including mCRC. We aimed at performing a comprehensive characterization of clinical, molecular, immunologic, and prognostic features of KRASG12D-mutated mCRC to inform the design and the interpretation of future trials.

METHODS

We performed a pooled analysis of phase III TRIBE and TRIBE2 studies comparing 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan (FOLFOXIRI)/bevacizumab (bev) to doublets (5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin or 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan)/bev.

RESULTS

One hundred and thirty-six (16%) of 854 patients with available KRASG12D mutational status were KRASG12D mutated. KRASG12D-mutated patients had more frequently right-sided primary tumor and were less likely to present liver-only metastases with respect to other RAS mutated and all-wild-type (wt) patients. Compared with the BRAFV600E-mutated group, KRASG12D-mutated patients had more frequently left-sided primary tumor, resected primary tumor at the time of diagnosis, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0. KRASG12D-mutated patients had better prognosis than BRAFV600E-mutated and worse prognosis than all wt patients. No prognostic difference was evident between KRASG12D mut and other RAS mut patients overall or according to other specific KRAS or NRAS hotspot mutations. No interaction effect was observed between KRASG12D mut and the benefit provided by FOLFOXIRI/bev compared with doublets/bev. PIK3CA mut were reported more frequently among KRASG12D-mutated tumors compared with both other RAS mut and all wt.

CONCLUSION

A detail estimation of KRASG12D mut mCRC patients' characteristics and expected outcomes may be useful when planning future studies in this subgroup. The high prevalence of PI3K/PTEN/Akt pathway activating alterations may affect the efficacy of targeted strategies.

Tretinoin synergistically enhances the antitumor effect of combined BRAF, MEK, and EGFR inhibition in BRAFV600E colorectal cancer

Patients with BRAF-mutated colorectal cancer (BRAFV600E CRC) are currently treated with a combination of BRAF inhibitor and anti-EGFR antibody with or without MEK inhibitor. A fundamental problem in treating patients with BRAFV600E CRC is intrinsic and/or acquired resistance to this combination therapy. By screening 78 compounds, we identified tretinoin, a retinoid, as a compound that synergistically enhances the antiproliferative effect of a combination of BRAF inhibition and MEK inhibition with or without EGFR inhibition on BRAFV600E CRC cells. This synergistic effect was also exerted by other retinoids. Tretinoin, added to BRAF inhibitor and MEK inhibitor, upregulated PARP, BAK, and p-H2AX. When either RARα or RXRα was silenced, the increase in cleaved PARP expression by the addition of TRE to ENC/BIN or ENC/BIN/CET was canceled. Our results suggest that the mechanism of the synergistic antiproliferative effect involves modulation of the Bcl-2 family and the DNA damage response that affects apoptotic pathways, and this synergistic effect is induced by RARα- or RXRα-mediated apoptosis. Tretinoin also enhanced the antitumor effect of a combination of the BRAF inhibitor and anti-EGFR antibody with or without MEK inhibitor in a BRAFV600E CRC xenograft mouse model. Our data provide a rationale for developing retinoids as a new combination agent to overcome resistance to the combination therapy for patients with BRAFV600E CRC.

KRAS, a New Target for Precision Medicine in Colorectal Cancer?

Colorectal cancer (CRC) remains a leading cause of cancer-related mortality globally, with significant public health concerns. This review examines the landscape of KRAS inhibition in colorectal cancer (CRC), focusing on recent advances in therapeutic strategies targeting this oncogene. Historically deemed undruggable due to its complex structure and essential role in tumorigenesis, KRAS mutations are prevalent in CRC and are associated with poor prognosis. However, breakthroughs in drug development have led to the emergence of KRAS inhibitors as promising treatment options. This review discusses various classes of KRAS inhibitors, including covalent and non-covalent inhibitors, as well as combination therapies aimed at enhancing efficacy and overcoming resistance mechanisms. It highlights recent clinical trials evaluating the efficacy of KRAS inhibitors either as monotherapy or in combination with other agents, such as anti-EGFR antibodies. Despite challenges such as resistance mechanisms and tumor heterogeneity, the development of KRAS inhibitors represents a significant advance in CRC treatment and holds promise for improving patient outcomes in the future.

Development and validation of a clinical prognostic model for BRAF V600E-mutated colorectal cancer patients based on pathological stage, microsatellite status, and primary tumor site

Objective

To develop and validate a prognostic model for patients with BRAF V600E-mutated colorectal cancer.

Methods

The clinical and pathological information of 206 patients with BRAF V600E-mutated colorectal cancer diagnosed in Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, and Peking Union Medical College from 2014 to 2021 was retrospectively collected. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression, Cox regression, and nomograms were used to develop clinical prognostic models. The differentiation was measured using C-statistic, and the predicted variability was evaluated using the calibration curve. The prognostic model was externally validated using validation set data from 164 patients pooled from five studies.

Results

Our clinical prognostic model included three variables: pathological stage, microsatellite status, and primary tumor site. In internal validation, the model had a concordant index of 0.785 (95% CI [0.732-0.839]) and a concordant index of 0.754 (95% CI [0.698-0.810]) using pathological staging. External validation confirmed the robustness of the model with a consistency index of 0.670 (95% CI [0.617-0.724]) and a consistency index of 0.584 (95% CI [0.546-0.622]) using pathological staging. Likelihood ratio test results show that our model is better (internal validation, p = 5.141e-03; external validation, p = 2.728e-05). The calibration graph drawn based on the prediction and the actual situation is close to the 45° diagonal.

Conclusion

By adding microsatellite status and primary tumor site on the basis of pathological stage, we improved the discriminability and prediction accuracy of the model and successfully established a prognosis model for patients with BRAF V600E mutation of colorectal cancer.

Is interval chemotherapy safe and does it improve the outcome of patients with colorectal liver metastases undergoing multimodal two-stage hepatectomy? - A systematic literature review

BACKGROUND

Multimodal two-stage hepatectomy (mTSH) is used in patients with bilobar colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) that cannot be treated with one surgical procedure due to insufficient future liver remnant. Interval chemotherapy has been proposed to improve disease control in CRLM patients undergoing mTSH. We here present a narrative review of clinical studies on mTSH including the use of interval chemotherapy in patients with CRLM.

METHODS

A systematic literature search of the PubMed databases as well as the ClinicalTrials.gov registry was performed.

RESULTS

The use of interval chemotherapy during mTSH was reported in 23 studies and applied in 595 out of 1,461 patients with CRLM. Two studies report on the actual effects of this treatment, one study describes a trend towards improved disease progression rate. No serious adverse events caused by interval chemotherapy were observed. There is currently no randomized clinical trial investigating the efficacy and safety of interval chemotherapy during mTSH.

CONCLUSION

The currently available data indicate that interval chemotherapy does neither impair liver hypertrophy during mTSH nor cause procedure-associated complications in patients with CRLM. Results from randomized clinical trials on the potential positive effect on disease control are not yet available.