Use of olaparib in patients with advanced gastric cancer - Authors' reply

Development of an Immunohistochemical Assay to Detect the Ataxia-Telangiectasia Mutated (ATM) Protein in Gastric Carcinoma

Ataxia-telangiectasia mutated (ATM), a key activator of DNA damage response mechanisms, represents a potential biomarker for targeted gastric carcinoma therapies. A phase II study (Study 39; NCT01063517) designed to investigate the combination olaparib plus paclitaxel in patients with recurrent or metastatic gastric cancer did not meet its primary endpoint of progression-free survival; however, an improvement in the secondary endpoint of overall survival was recorded with a greater overall survival benefit noted in patients with ATM-negative tumors. An ATM immunohistochemical (IHC) diagnostic assay was developed to identify patients who may respond favorably to targeted therapies and deployed in the confirmatory phase III GOLD trial (NCT01924533). The VENTANA ATM (Y170) assay was developed for investigational use in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded gastric carcinoma samples using an anti-ATM rabbit monoclonal antibody (clone Y170) and was optimized with OptiView DAB IHC Detection Kit on a BenchMark ULTRA instrument. The assay was deployed in studies assessing sensitivity, specificity, robustness, precision, and determining optimal ATM staining cutoff to define ATM-deficiency (ATM-low). The ATM (Y170) assay met all predefined product development acceptance criteria. Multiple parameters were characterized, including repeatability, reproducibility, analytical sensitivity, specificity, robustness, and product stability. The scoring algorithm was defined; gastric carcinoma samples were considered ATM-negative or ATM-positive when <25% or ≥25%, respectively, of tumor cell nuclei expressed ATM at any IHC stain intensity and nuclei of immune and/or endothelial cells expressed ATM at a moderate stain intensity (internal positive control). Results highlight reproducibility of the assay, supporting suitability for investigational use for evaluation of gastric carcinoma samples using tumor cell staining cutoff of <25% to define ATM-deficiency. Using this ATM assay, phase III GOLD trial (NCT01924533) clinical trial did not meet its primary endpoint, only suggesting, but not demonstrating, that assessment of ATM levels by IHC could possibly be useful in assessing the degree of benefit that may be achieved by adding olaparib to paxitaxel when treating gastric carcinoma. The utility of ATM (Y170) assay as a companion diagnostic requires further clinical validation.

Precision medicine in gastric cancer

Gastric cancer (GC) is a complex disease linked to a series of environmental factors and unhealthy lifestyle habits, and especially to genetic alterations. GC represents the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Its onset is subtle, and the majority of patients are diagnosed once the cancer is already advanced. In recent years, there have been innovations in the management of advanced GC including the introduction of new classifications based on its molecular characteristics. Thanks to new technologies such as next-generation sequencing and microarray, the Cancer Genome Atlas and Asian Cancer Research Group classifications have also paved the way for precision medicine in GC, making it possible to integrate diagnostic and therapeutic methods. Among the objectives of the subdivision of GC into subtypes is to select patients in whom molecular targeted drugs can achieve the best results; many lines of research have been initiated to this end. After phase III clinical trials, trastuzumab, anti-Erb-B2 receptor tyrosine kinase 2 (commonly known as ERBB2) and ramucirumab, anti-vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (commonly known as VEGFR2) monoclonal antibodies, were approved and introduced into first- and second-line therapies for patients with advanced/metastatic GC. However, the heterogeneity of this neoplasia makes the practical application of such approaches difficult. Unfortunately, scientific progress has not been matched by progress in clinical practice in terms of significant improvements in prognosis. Survival continues to be low in contrast to the reduction in deaths from many common cancers such as colorectal, lung, breast, and prostate cancers. Although several target molecules have been identified on which targeted drugs can act and novel products have been introduced into experimental therapeutic protocols, the overall approach to treating advanced stage GC has not substantially changed. Currently, surgical resection with adjuvant or neoadjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy are the most effective treatments for this disease. Future research should not underestimate the heterogeneity of GC when developing diagnostic and therapeutic strategies aimed toward improving patient survival.