Encorafenib plus binimetinib versus vemurafenib or encorafenib in patients with BRAF-mutant melanoma (COLUMBUS): a multicentre, open-label, randomised phase 3 trial

Management of In-transit Disease: Regional Therapies, Intralesional Therapies, and Systemic Therapy

In-transit (IT) melanoma represents a distinct, heterogeneous pattern of disease that arises as superficial tumors along the track between the primary site and the draining regional lymph node basin. Many therapies have been explored for treatment of this disease with the goal of maximizing delivery of the therapeutic agent to the tumor while minimizing systemic toxicities. These include regional chemotherapies, intralesional injections, checkpoint inhibitors, immunomodulators, and vaccines in various combinations or as monotherapy. Here, we review the general managemnt of patients with ITmelanoma, the range of currently available treatment options, and recommendations for specific therapies for individual patients.

Improved Survival and Prognostication in Melanoma Patients With Brain Metastases: An Update of the Melanoma Graded Prognostic Assessment

PURPOSE

Survival for patients with melanoma has recently improved. The propensity of melanoma to metastasize to the brain remains a common and serious feature of this disease. The purposes of this study were to evaluate prognostic factors for patients with newly diagnosed melanoma brain metastases (MBMs) in a large cohort treated with modern multimodal therapies, compare those results with those in prior eras, and update the Melanoma Graded Prognostic Assessment (GPA).

METHODS

Univariable and multivariable (MVA) analyses of prognostic factors and treatments associated with survival were performed on 1,796 patients with newly diagnosed MBM treated between January 01, 2015, and December 31, 2021, using a multi-institutional retrospective database. Multiple imputation was used to address missingness of potential predictors. Significant variables in combined MVA were used to update the Melanoma GPA. Comparisons were made with legacy cohorts.

RESULTS

Median survivals for cohorts A (1985-2007, n = 481), B (2006-2015, n = 823), and C (2015-2021, n = 1,796) were 6.7, 9.8, and 16.6 months and median follow-up times were 40.1, 43.6, and 48.8 months, respectively. In combined MVA, significant prognostic factors for survival were higher Karnofsky Performance Status, fewer MBMs, absence of extracranial metastases, lower serum lactate dehydrogenase, and no immunotherapy before MBM. These factors were incorporated into the updated Melanoma GPA. The combined median and 3-year survivals for patients with GPA 0-1, 1.5-2, and 2.5-4.0 were 5.4, 13.2, and 43.2 months and 12.4%, 28.8%, and 51.6%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Prognostic factors have changed and survival has improved for patients with MBM but varies widely by GPA. The updated Melanoma GPA calculator (BrainMetGPA), available free online, can be used to estimate survival, individualize treatment, stratify clinical trials, guide surveillance, and augment clinical trial eligibility. Multidisciplinary treatment is essential. Trials are needed to elucidate the optimal sequencing of various therapeutic modalities.

Resistance to BRAF inhibitors drives melanoma sensitivity to Chk1 inhibition

BRAF inhibitor-resistant melanomas (BRAFiR) acquire (epi)genetic and functional alterations that enable them to evade alternative treatments. Identifying these alterations is critical to advancing treatment strategies. Here, we explored the effect of Chk1 inhibition (Chk1i) on BRAFiR cells, revealing higher sensitivity compared to treatment-naïve cells both in vitro and in vivo. Using FUCCI-labeling and time-lapse microscopy, we show that S phase progression is required for Chk1i-induced cytotoxicity in BRAFiR cells, but not in treatment-naïve cells. Replication stress markers, including reduced BrdU incorporation and increased phospho-RPA and γH2AX, were observed mostly in BRAFiR cells with increased sensitivity to Chk1i. Untreated BRAFiR cells exhibited upregulated DNA replication genes, reduced progressing forks and increased origin firing, suggesting intrinsic replication changes. MAPK pathway reactivation in treatment-naïve cells mimicked BRAFiR traits, increasing sensitivity to Chk1i. These findings indicate that Chk1i exploits elevated replication stress specifically in BRAFiR cells, highlighting its therapeutic potential in overcoming MAPK inhibitor resistance in BRAF600-mutant melanoma.

Cardiovascular Safety Profile of BRAF and MEK Inhibitors in Melanoma: FAERS Data Through a Retrospective Disproportionality Analysis (2014-2023)

Introduction: The combination of BRAF and MEK inhibitors (BRAF/MEKi) has significantly improved survival in melanoma patients with BRAF V600 mutations. However, these agents can cause cardiovascular (CV) toxicity, compromising efficacy. This study evaluated the CV adverse events (cAEs) associated with BRAF/MEKi using the U.S. FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) to identify new signals of disproportionate reporting (SDRs). Methods: Descriptive and disproportionality analyses were conducted on reports listing dabrafenib (D), vemurafenib (V), encorafenib (E), trametinib (T), cobimetinib (C), or binimetinib (B) as suspects in monotherapy or combination therapy (D + T, V + C, E + B), with melanoma as the indication and at least one cAE. Standardized MedDRA Queries (SMQs) related to cAEs, including bradyarrhythmias and tachyarrhythmias, cardiac failure, cardiomyopathy, thrombotic events, ischaemic heart disease, and myocarditis/pericarditis, were analyzed. Results: Of the 14,077,067 reports retrieved, 18,370 (0.1%) were linked to BRAF/MEKi, with 1591 (8.7%) reporting cAEs, primarily in combination therapy (n = 1268). Disproportionality analysis identified 64 clinically relevant SDRs, most of which were unexpected. Notable findings included bradyarrhythmias, such as QT prolongation with D + T (n = 59; Reporting Odds Ratio, ROR = 5.09, 95% Confidence Interval, CI = 3.94-6.58), cardiac failure with V + C (29; 3.76, 2.6-5.42), and tachyarrhythmias, particularly atrial fibrillation with D + T (99; 2.37, 1.94-2.89). Among embolic and thrombotic events, clinically significant SDRs were observed for disseminated intravascular coagulation with D + T (38; 10.22, 7.42-14.06) and pulmonary embolism with V + C (22; 2.79, 1.83-4.24). Conclusions: Our findings underscore the need for comprehensive CV monitoring in patients receiving BRAF/MEKi therapy to prevent or detect cAEs early and reduce treatment-related risks, particularly in high-risk populations.

Management of Adverse Events During Treatment for Advanced Thyroid Cancer

Background: The management of advanced thyroid cancer has rapidly evolved as several multikinase, and gene-specific inhibitors have substantially improved survival for patients with most types of thyroid cancer. Optimizing management of the treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) from these medications is important to improve quality of life and outcomes for patients with thyroid cancer. This narrative review discusses common and clinically significant TRAEs of treatments for thyroid cancer and effective management approaches. Summary: Published literature was reviewed to summarize available information on the incidence of TRAEs with medications used to treat thyroid cancer and management approaches for these TRAEs. There are common TRAEs across many treatments for advanced thyroid cancer including fatigue, hypertension, gastrointestinal toxicities, rashes, and hand-foot syndrome. Additionally, several other TRAEs with thyroid cancer treatments are significant because of their frequency with specific medications (e.g., pyrexia syndrome) or their severity (e.g., thromboembolic events and cardiac impairment). Data from clinical trials and real-world data along with expert guidelines and insights from experienced clinicians can guide management approaches for many of these TRAEs. Conclusions: The toxicity profiles are well established for treatments for advanced thyroid cancer, there are evidence-based management approaches for many commonly encountered scenarios. Following these approaches to optimizing management of TRAEs can improve the quality of life and outcomes for patients with thyroid cancer.

Cost per outcome of nivolumab + relatlimab vs BRAF + MEK inhibitor combinations for first-line treatment of BRAF-mutant advanced melanoma

BACKGROUND

The National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines list combination immunotherapy as the preferred first-line (1L) treatment for unresectable or metastatic melanoma over BRAF and MEK inhibitor (BRAFi/MEKi) therapy, regardless of BRAF mutation status. However, the economic impact of 1L treatment with nivolumab plus relatlimab (NIVO + RELA) vs BRAFi/MEKi therapies for BRAF-mutated advanced melanoma has not been assessed.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the health care costs, cost per progression-free life-year (PFLY), and cost per life-year (LY) of NIVO + RELA vs dabrafenib plus trametinib (DAB + TRAM), encorafenib plus binimetinib (ENCO + BINI), and vemurafenib plus cobimetinib (VEM + COBI) as 1L treatment for BRAF-mutated, unresectable or metastatic melanoma.

METHODS

A cost-per-outcome model compared the economic value of NIVO + RELA vs each BRAFi/MEKi therapy. Clinical inputs were derived from previous matching-adjusted indirect comparisons using individual patient data from the BRAF-mutant subgroup of RELATIVITY-047 and published data pooled from COMBI-d, COMBI-v, COLUMBUS, and coBRIM. LYs, PFLYs per investigator, and treatment duration were estimated using the restricted mean survival time. Health care costs (2024 US dollars), including drug acquisition and administration costs, disease management costs over the preprogression and postprogression periods, and adverse event management costs, were calculated over 5 years. Several scenario analyses were performed, including adding subsequent treatment costs.

RESULTS

Over 5 years, NIVO + RELA was associated with improved PFLYs and LYs compared with DAB + TRAM (mean PFLY: 1.94 vs 1.82 years, mean LY: 3.41 vs 2.77 years), ENCO + BINI (1.87 vs 1.78 years and 3.40 vs 2.91 years, respectively), and VEM + COBI (2.12 vs 1.80 years and 3.39 vs 2.63 years). The estimated total costs over 5 years were lower for NIVO + RELA vs DAB + TRAM ($300,479 vs $519,770), ENCO + BINI ($343,996 vs $572,556), and VEM + COBI ($296,361 vs $317,851). Main cost drivers were drug acquisition and administration costs. NIVO + RELA had lower costs per PFLY and per LY than DAB + TRAM ($155,107 vs $285,617 and $88,203 vs $187,699, respectively); ENCO + BINI ($183,628 vs $322,113 and $101,151 vs $196,924); and VEM + COBI ($139,688 vs $176,645 and $87,315 vs $121,086). The sensitivity analyses' results supported the base-case results.

CONCLUSIONS

NIVO + RELA showed improved LYs and PFLYs at lower cost than all 3 BRAFi/MEKi comparators over 5 years. These results support the economic value of NIVO + RELA for patients with previously untreated, BRAF-mutated, unresectable or metastatic melanoma.

The 2024 revised clinical guidelines on the management of thyroid tumors by the Japan Association of Endocrine Surgery

The Japan Association of Endocrine Surgery published the first edition of the "Clinical guidelines on the management of thyroid tumors" in 2010 and the revised edition in 2018. The guideline presented herein is the English translation of the revised third edition, issued in 2024. The aim is to enhance health outcomes for patients suffering from thyroid tumors by facilitating evidence-based shared decision-making between healthcare providers and patients, as well as standardizing the management of thyroid tumors. The focus is on adult patients with thyroid tumors, addressing clinically significant issues categorized into areas such as an overview of the diagnosis and treatment of thyroid nodules, treatment strategies by histological type, radioactive iodine therapy, treatment of advanced differentiated carcinoma, pharmacotherapy, and complications and safety management associated with thyroid surgery. Thirty-two clinical questions were established in these areas. Following a comprehensive search of the literature and systematic review to evaluate the overall evidence, we aimed to present optimal recommendations by considering the balance of benefits and harms from the patient's perspective. We integrated evidence and clinical experience to determine the "Certainty of evidence" and "Strength of recommendations". Based on these, we illustrated overall flows of care as "Clinical algorithms". Necessary background knowledge of diseases and established clinical procedures for understanding the recommendations are presented in "Notes", while information that may be clinically useful but for which evidence remains insufficient is included in "Columns", based on the current state of evidence. Finally, future challenges for the next revision are presented as "Future research questions".

The Role of RAS in CNS Tumors: A Key Player or an Overlooked Oncogene?

This review examines the prevalence, molecular mechanisms, and clinical implications of RAS mutations in Central Nervous System (CNS) tumors, with a particular focus on glioblastoma. We summarize the current understanding of RAS-driven oncogenic pathways, their contribution to tumor progression, and potential therapeutic strategies targeting RAS and its downstream effectors. Although direct RAS mutations are rare in primary CNS tumors, alterations in RAS signaling, such as NF-1 loss and aberrant receptor tyrosine kinase activation, contribute to malignant progression. Furthermore, emerging evidence links RAS mutations to brain metastases, highlighting their significance in CNS oncology. We also discuss recent clinical trials investigating RAS-targeted therapies, including covalent inhibitors, MEK inhibitors, and novel combination approaches. Given the increasing recognition of RAS pathway alterations in CNS malignancies, further research is needed to elucidate their role in tumor biology and explore targeted therapeutic interventions.

Pancreatitis associated with BRAF inhibitors: a disproportionality analysis based on the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System

BACKGROUND

The relationship between the development of pancreatitis and the use of BRAF (B-Raf proto-oncogene, serine/threonine kinase) inhibitors remains incompletely understood, primarily due to the infrequency of such cases.

AIM

This study aimed to investigate the association between BRAF inhibitors and pancreatitis, and to describe the clinical characteristics of pancreatitis related to these agents.

METHOD

A disproportionality analysis was conducted using data from the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System between July 2011 and June 2024. The reporting odds ratio (ROR) and information component (IC) were employed to assess the association between BRAF inhibitors and pancreatitis. Additionally, subgroup analysis and time-to-onset analysis were further performed.

RESULTS

A total of 169 cases of pancreatitis were identified in association with BRAF inhibitors: 71 cases with vemurafenib, 63 with dabrafenib, and 35 with encorafenib. The median age of patients was 62 years. Vemurafenib, dabrafenib, and encorafenib all showed a positive signal for pancreatitis, with respective RORs and ICs as follows: vemurafenib (ROR 2.46, 95% CI 1.95-3.10; IC = 1.27, 95% CI 0.88-1.56), dabrafenib (ROR 1.56, 95% CI 1.22-2.00; IC = 0.63, 95% CI 0.21-0.93), and encorafenib (ROR 2.59, 95% CI 1.86-3.62; IC = 1.34, 95% CI 0.77-1.74). The shortest median time-to-onset for pancreatitis was observed with vemurafenib (6.5 days), followed by encorafenib (14.0 days) and dabrafenib (129.5 days).

CONCLUSION

This study reveals a significant reporting association between BRAF inhibitors and the development of pancreatitis, with a higher risk observed in the early stage of treatment.

Current Treatment Paradigms for Advanced Melanoma with Brain Metastases

The therapeutic management of melanoma brain metastases has undergone a profound revolution during recent decades. Optimal integration of systemic therapies with local treatments seems to represent the strategy to pursue in order to maximize clinical outcomes, stressing the need for real multidisciplinary care in this setting of patients. However, the current approach in the clinics does not necessarily reflect what the current guidelines state, and several pending issues are present, from the ideal therapeutic sequence between stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and drug administration to the current role of surgery and whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT), all of which need to be addressed. This narrative review aims to provide practical help for navigating the current controversies, with an eye towards possible future advancements in the field, which could help to obtain a comprehensive molecular characterization of the tumor and a more personalized patient-centered therapeutic approach.

BRAF Targeting Across Solid Tumors: Molecular Aspects and Clinical Applications

BRAF mutations are critical drivers in cancers such as melanoma, colorectal cancer, and non-small-cell lung cancer. The most common mutation, BRAF V600E, is a key therapeutic target. Targeted treatments with BRAF and MEK inhibitors have significantly improved progression-free and overall survival in melanoma patients. However, in cancers like metastatic colorectal cancer, BRAF mutations are associated with poor outcomes due to aggressive disease behavior and resistance to conventional chemotherapy. Despite progress, resistance to BRAF/MEK inhibitors remains a major challenge, often driven by secondary mutations in the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway, activation of alternative pathways such as phosphoinositide 3-kinases (PI3Ks)/protein kinase B (AKT), or changes in the tumor microenvironment. These challenges have motivated ongoing research into combining BRAF inhibitors with immunotherapies to enhance and prolong treatment effectiveness. Future research must also account for the role of the cancer's tissue of origin, as the biological context significantly influences response to targeted therapies, highlighting the need for a deeper understanding of tumor biology, micro-environment, and genetics.

Molecular targeted maintenance therapy versus standard of care in advanced biliary cancer: an international, randomised, controlled, open-label, phase III umbrella trial (SAFIR-ABC10-Precision Medicine)

BACKGROUND

Advanced biliary tract cancers (ABCs) are a heterogeneous group of rare malignancies of the bile ducts and gall-bladder with a poor prognosis and limited treatment options. Cisplatin-gemcitabine (CISGEM) chemotherapy plus immunotherapy (durvalumab or pembrolizumab) is the current first-line standard of care (1L-SoC). ABCs frequently harbour actionable molecular alterations that suggest a high potential for benefit from molecular targeted therapies (MTTs). However, the assessment of potential first-line MTT treatments is hindered by the scarcity of ABCs harbouring a specific alteration and the time required to carry out tumour molecular profiling.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We detail here the design of SAFIR-ABC10, an international, randomised, phase III umbrella trial comparing the efficacy of sequential matched targeted therapy after four cycles (12 weeks) of 1L-SoC versus continued 1L-SoC in patients with ABC and an actionable molecular alteration [European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) Scale for Clinical Actionability of molecular Targets (ESCAT) tier I or II]. The primary study endpoint is progression-free survival. Besides initial tumour and circulating DNA next-generation sequencing analysis, sequential blood and tumour sampling will be carried out to identify biomarkers of prognosis, response and acquired resistance.

PERSPECTIVES

SAFIR-ABC10 is, to our knowledge, the first randomised, umbrella trial assessing the concept of precision medicine in ABC, the ideal setting for addressing this question with a high rate of targetable alterations.

Cell Death Modalities in Therapy of Melanoma

Melanoma, one of the most lethal cancers, demands urgent and effective treatment strategies. However, a successful therapeutic approach requires a precise understanding of the mechanisms underlying melanoma initiation and progression. This review provides an overview of melanoma pathogenesis, identifies current pathogenic factors contributing to mortality, and explores targeted therapy and checkpoint inhibitor therapy. Furthermore, we examine melanoma classification and corresponding therapies, along with advancements in various cell death mechanisms for melanoma treatment. We also discuss the current treatment status along with some drawbacks encountered during research stages such as resistance and metastasis.

Squamous Cell Carcinoma and Its Rare Variant, Carcinoma Cuniculatum: Insights and Case Studies

BACKGROUND

Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) presents a significant challenge in dermatological pathology, necessitating comprehensive insights for effective management. This review highlights SCC's broad aspects and focuses particularly on carcinoma cuniculatum (CC), a rare variant that warrants special attention due to its unique diagnostic and therapeutic challenges.

METHODS


We conducted a narrative review of current literature on SCC and CC, supplemented by illustrative clinical case presentations. The analysis emphasized epidemiology, pathogenesis, clinical presentation, diagnostic pitfalls, and treatment modalities.

RESULTS


The key findings from our analysis indicate that CC, although locally aggressive, exhibits a lower metastatic potential and requires distinct management strategies, primarily surgical, due to its poor responsiveness to radiotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS


The review also includes illustrative clinical cases to highlight the diverse presentations and underscore the necessity for multidisciplinary approaches and heightened clinical vigilance in diagnosing and managing CC. By consolidating current knowledge and clinical experiences, this review aims to enhance awareness, facilitate early recognition, and optimize therapeutic strategies for SCC, particularly CC, thereby improving patient outcomes and prognosis.

Cutaneous melanoma

Cutaneous melanoma is a common cancer in Australia and New Zealand, Europe, and North America, and its incidence is still increasing in many regions. Ultraviolet (UV) radiation exposure (for example, through excessive sunlight exposure) remains the primary risk factor for melanoma; however, public awareness campaigns have led to a marked reduction in mortality. In addition to genetic damage from UV radiation, specific genetic alterations have been linked to melanoma. The stage of the tumour at the time of diagnosis is of greater importance for melanoma prognosis than in almost any other cancer. Context-dependent genetic mutations that attenuate tumour-suppressive mechanisms or activate growth-promoting signalling pathways are crucial factors in the development of cutaneous melanoma. In addition to external factors such as UV radiation, the tumour microenvironment can contribute to melanoma progression, invasion and metastasis. Cutaneous melanoma treatment has improved considerably over the past decade with the discovery and development of immune checkpoint inhibitors and therapy targeting BRAF and MEK. Over the next decade, several priorities are likely to influence melanoma research and management, including the continued advance of precision medicine methods to identify the most suitable patients for the most effective treatment, with the aim of improving clinical outcomes.

Post-marketing surveillance of encorafenib in combination with binimetinib in Japanese patients with BRAF-mutant melanoma

BACKGROUND

A BRAF inhibitor, encorafenib, combined with a MEK inhibitor, binimetinib, was approved in Japan in early 2019 for the treatment of BRAF V600-mutant, unresectable malignant melanoma based on results of the global phase III trial, COLUMBUS, conducted in various countries including Japan. This post-marketing surveillance (PMS) assessed the combination in real-world clinical practice in Japan.

METHODS

We performed a prospective, multicentre, 12-month PMS of the safety and effectiveness of encorafenib plus binimetinib for radically unresectable, BRAF-mutant malignant melanoma in Japan.

RESULTS

Among 174 survey forms collected from 85 centres between February 2019 and August 2020, 172 were included for safety and effectiveness analysis. Patients (male [52.3%], median age 62.0 years) had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status 0 or 1 (91.8%) and comorbidities (55.2%). Respective encorafenib and binimetinib median dosages were 450 mg/day and 90 mg/day; median treatment duration, 24.1 and 24.2 weeks, and discontinuation, 71.5% for each, primarily for disease progression (56.9%) and adverse drug reactions (ADRs, 38.2%). Safety assessment ADRs occurred in 99 patients (57.6%), including eye disorders (40.7%), hepatic dysfunction (20.3%), rhabdomyolysis (4.7%), haemorrhage (2.3%), palmar-plantar erythrodysaesthesia syndrome (1.7%), and hypertension (1.7%); 19.8% were grade ≥ 3, none were grade 5, most resolved with/without treatment modification. At 12 months, the objective response rate was 48.8% (95% CI 41.2, 56.6; complete [19.2%], partial [29.7%]), overall survival was 40.1%.

CONCLUSION

The safety and effectiveness of encorafenib plus binimetinib in Japanese patients with BRAF-mutant malignant melanoma were similar to data reported in COLUMBUS; no new safety concerns were identified.

Neurologic adverse events associated with BRAF and MEK inhibitor therapy in patients with malignant melanoma: a disproportionality analysis using the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System

BRAF and MEK inhibitor (BRAFi + MEKi) therapy has improved the treatment of solid tumors with BRAF mutation. However, their neurologic adverse events (nAEs) have been largely unexplored. This study aimed to provide clinicians with more updated knowledge on nAEs associated with BRAFi + MEKi therapy in patients with malignant melanoma compared with nonmelanoma cancers. The United States Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System was queried from 2011 to 2022 to capture nAEs reported for the BRAFi + MEKi therapies, vemurafenib plus cobimetinib (V + C), dabrafenib plus trametinib (D + T), and encorafenib plus binimetinib (E + B). A disproportionality analysis was performed to calculate their reporting odds ratios (RORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using a control group of antineoplastic medications. There were 2881 BRAFi + MEKi therapy-associated nAE cases, the majority of which listed malignant melanoma as the reason for use (87.5, 66.7, and 62.0% for V + C, D + T, and E + B, respectively). Several novel associations were identified; including epidural lipomatosis (ROR: 320.07, 95% CI: 123.76-827.77 for V + C), peripheral nerve lesion (ROR: 185.64, 95% CI: 73.95-466.03 for V + C), Guillain-Barre syndrome (RORs: 8.80, 2.94, and 11.79, 95% CIs: 3.65-21.22, 1.40-6.19, and 5.87-23.66 for V + C, D + T, and E + B), demyelinating polyneuropathy (RORs: 24.72 and 78.98, 95% CI: 8.16-74.86 and 24.84-251.13 for D + T and E + B), and multiple sclerosis (ROR: 5.90, 95% CI: 3.06-11.40 for D + T) in melanoma patients. nAEs in the setting of BRAFi + MEKi therapy should be a safety consideration when utilizing these medications.

Self-assembled patient-derived tumor-like cell clusters for personalized drug testing in diverse sarcomas

Several patient-derived tumor models have emerged recently. However, soft tissue sarcomas (STSs) present a challenge in developing preclinical drug-testing models due to their non-epithelial and complex nature. Here, we report a model termed patient-derived tumor-like cell clusters (PTCs) derived from STS patients. PTCs result from the self-assembly and proliferation of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), epithelial cells, and immune cells, faithfully recapitulating the morphology and function of the original tumors. Through standardized culture and drug-response assessment protocols, PTCs facilitate personalized drug testing, evaluating hundreds of therapies within two weeks. Notably, PTCs exhibit 100% accuracy in distinguishing between complete or partial response and disease progression. We demonstrate the utility of PTCs in guiding chemotherapy selection for a patient with relapse and metastases following conventional therapy, who exhibited a positive response after non-conventional therapy identified through PTC. These findings underscore the potential of PTCs for prospective use in clinical decision-making regarding therapy selection.

Frequency and outcomes of BRAF alterations identified by liquid biopsy in metastatic, non-colorectal gastrointestinal cancers

BACKGROUND

Impact of BRAF V600E mutations (BRAFV600E), a poor prognostic factor in metastatic colorectal cancer, is lacking in non-CRC gastrointestinal (GI) cancers including pancreatic (PDAC), gastric/gastroesophageal (GEA), hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and cholangiocarcinoma (CCA). Due to tumor-agnostic approvals for patients with BRAFV600E, understanding the frequency and impact of BRAF alterations across non-CRC GI cancers is essential for clinical decision-making.

METHODS

Patients with PDAC, GEA, HCC, or CCA who had cell-free DNA detected on Guardant360 (Guardant Health) from 2020 to 2023 were queried. Prevalence of characterized BRAF genomic alterations (GA) was calculated; GAs were grouped by class (Class I/II/III). The Chi-squared test assessed differences between cancer types. A subset of patients had outcomes analysis using GuardantINFORM, a real-world clinicogenomic database, to derive real-world overall survival (rwOS).

RESULTS

Of 32 480 included patients, BRAF GAs were identified in 4.4%; 19% were BRAFV600E (0.81% prevalence overall). CCA had the highest rate of BRAF GAs and BRAFV600E (P < .01); HCC and GEA had the highest rates of BRAF class II/III alterations. There were no significant differences in rwOS by alteration class or cancer type; numeric differences were observed by alteration class. Few patients were treated with BRAF inhibitors (2.2%). Prevalence of co-occurring alterations was unique by cancer type.

CONCLUSIONS

Frequency of BRAF GAs, including BRAFV600E, in non-CRC GI cancers detected by liquid biopsy is similar to tissue-based rates and can be reliably used to assess BRAF status. BRAF GAs have mixed prognostic implications on survival for patients with non-CRC GI malignancies that warrant further exploration.

Integrating epidemiology and genomics data to estimate the prevalence of acquired cysteine drug targets in the U.S. cancer patient population

Reliable estimates for the number of cancer patients with a specific mutation can help quantify the size of the population that could potentially benefit from a targeted therapy. We adapt our previously developed approach for estimating gene-level mutation abundances to estimate mutation-specific (e.g., KRAS G12C) abundances by combining United States cancer epidemiology and genomic data. We demonstrate the approach by obtaining population-level estimates for all acquired somatic missense mutations that create a de novo cysteine residue. We find that approximately 14% of non-epidemiological informed estimates are more than twice the epidemiological informed estimate. Non-epidemiologically informed pan-cancer estimation of mutation rates may not be representative of the number of cancer patients with a specific mutation. Our study suggests that epidemiological and genomic information should be combined when estimating the population level abundance of specific pathogenic mutations.

Encorafenib, cetuximab and chemotherapy in BRAF-mutant colorectal cancer: a randomized phase 3 trial

Encorafenib + cetuximab (EC) is approved for previously treated BRAF V600E-mutant metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) based on the BEACON phase 3 study. Historically, first-line treatment of BRAF V600E-mutant mCRC with chemotherapy regimens has had limited efficacy. The phase 3 BREAKWATER study investigated EC+mFOLFOX6 versus standard of care (SOC) in patients with previously untreated BRAF V600E mCRC. The dual primary endpoint of progression-free survival is event driven; data were not mature at data cutoff. BREAKWATER met the other dual primary endpoint of objective response rate, demonstrating significant and clinically relevant improvement in objective response rate (EC+mFOLFOX6: 60.9%; SOC: 40.0%; odds ratio, 2.443; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.403-4.253; 99.8% CI: 1.019-5.855; one-sided P = 0.0008). Median duration of response was 13.9 versus 11.1 months. At this first interim analysis of overall survival, the hazard ratio was 0.47 (95% CI: 0.318-0.691; repeated CI: 0.166-1.322). Serious adverse event rates were 37.7% versus 34.6%. The safety profiles were consistent with those known for each agent. BREAKWATER demonstrated a significantly improved response rate that was durable for first-line EC+mFOLFOX6 versus SOC in patients with BRAF V600E mCRC. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04607421 .

PTPN9 promotes melanoma progression by regulating the ferroptosis pathway

In recent years, there has been a gradual increase in the incidence and mortality rates of melanoma, posing a significant threat to human health and life. Protein tyrosine phosphatases (PTPNs) have been implicated in the progression of various human cancers, including breast, lung, and cervical cancer. To investigate PTPN9 expression in melanoma, impacting the disease's survival and prognosis. Our study, which involved an analysis of The Cancer Genome Atlas database and immunohistochemical staining of pathological sections, identified an upregulation of PTPN9 expression in melanoma, impacting the disease's survival and prognosis. At the cellular level, we investigated the effects of PTPN9 on the proliferation, invasion, and metastasis of A375 and SK-MEL-28 cells. Through various experimental techniques such as Western blot protein detection, electron microscopy, and oil red O staining, we observed that PTPN9 potentially contributes to the development of skin cutaneous melanoma (SKCM) by regulating ferroptosis-related proteins ACSL4, FTH1, and P53, thereby influencing lipid metabolism. The results of this study highlight the unique role of PTPN9 in SKCM and suggest its potential as a biomarker for the disease.

Real-life evidence of encorafenib plus binimetinib in patients with unresectable advanced or metastatic BRAFV600-mutant melanoma in Spain: the BECARE (GEM-2002) trial

Purpose

Combined BRAF/MEK inhibition with encorafenib (E) plus binimetinib (B) has demonstrated efficacy and tolerability in phase III clinical trials, and is the standard of care for advanced/metastatic BRAFV600-mutant melanoma. However, real-life evidence is limited, particularly in patients pre-treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI).

Patients and methods

BECARE GEM 2002 was a retrospective, non-interventional study aimed at investigating the real-world effectiveness and tolerability of EB in patients with unresectable or metastatic BRAFV600-mutant melanoma conducted at 21 sites in Spain. The primary objective of this study was to characterise the population of patients receiving EB and assess the efficacy and tolerability of EB in real life. The study included patients treated according to standard clinical practice with EB as the 1st line or 2nd line after progression to ICI for an unresectable or metastatic stage. Patients who previously received treatment with BRAF and/or MEK inhibitor, other than as adjuvants, that ended ≥ 6 m before EB were not eligible.

Results

From September 2021 to March 2023, 117 patients were included; 89 (76.1%) and 28 (23.9%) patients received EB as 1st line and 2nd line, respectively. The median follow-up was 13.8 months (95% CI: 12.0-17.4). In patients with EB as 1st line treatment, ORR and median PFS were 75% and 12 months (95% CI: 9.4-18.6), respectively. In patients with EB as 2nd line treatment after ICI, ORR and median PFS were 77.8% and 12.5 months (95% CI: 6.6-NA), respectively. In patients with brain metastasis ORR and median PFS were 70.8% and 6.3 months (95% CI: 6.1-10.3). Treatment-related adverse events of grade ≥3 were reported in 17 (14.5%) patients; transaminitis (9.4%) and diarrhoea (2.6%) were the most frequent adverse events.

Conclusion

In this real-world study, EB treatment demonstrated effectiveness and a consistent safety profile in patients with BRAFV600-mutant melanoma treated according to standard clinical practice, including in those with prior ICI treatment and of brain metastasis; therefore, EB is a feasible treatment option for unresectable and metastatic melanoma.Clinical trial identification: REec: 0004-2021-OBS.

Clinical trial identification

REec: 0004-2021-OBS.

Treatment at the end of life in patients with advanced melanoma. A multicenter DeCOG study of 1067 patients from the prospective skin cancer registry ADOReg

Background

Although systemic therapies have improved considerably over the last decade, up to 50% of patients with metastatic melanoma still die due to disease progression. Oncological treatment at the end-of-life phase is challenging. The aim of this study was to investigate the frequency and type of systemic therapy received by melanoma patients in their end-of-life phase.

Methods

Patients with metastatic melanoma who had died between January 1, 2018 and October 31, 2022 were identified from the prospective multicenter skin cancer registry ADOReg. Study endpoints were percentage of patients who had been treated with systemic therapy within the last three months of life, timepoint of initiation of the last-line therapy, overall survival, treatment benefit and the incidence of treatment-related adverse events.

Results

In total, 1067 patients from 46 skin cancer centers were included. Most of the patients (63%) had received immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) as last-line therapy, 22% targeted therapies (TT) and 12% chemotherapy (CTX). Comparing last-line ICI and TT, patients with TT were significantly more likely to benefit from treatment and had significantly fewer and milder treatment-related AE than patients with ICI. Even though two thirds of patients had received ICI as a last-line therapy, the majority of these patients (61%) had stopped therapy within the last 30 days of life, whereas the majority of patients with TT (66%) still continued their treatment to the end of life. We found markedly fewer patients with initiation of ICI within 30 days before their death (19%) compared to a historic cohort including patients who died in 2016 or 2017 (39%).

Conclusion

Treatment approaches near the end of life have markedly changed in skin cancer centers in Germany over recent years, with ICI prescribed less frequently in the end-of-life phase. In contrast, TT are frequently administered, even within the last 30 days of life. It should also be considered that discontinuation of TT can result in rapid tumor progression. Due to the oral administration and a low rate of severe toxicity, TT appear to be a suitable treatment option, even in the end-of-life situation of melanoma patients.

Design and synthesis of novel pyrimidine-pyrazole hybrids with dual anticancer and anti-inflammatory effects targeting BRAFV600E and JNK

Two new series of pyrimidinyl ethyl pyrazoles derivatives 13a-f and 14a-f were designed and synthesized to possess both anticancer effect by inhibiting BRAFV600E and anti-inflammatory effect by inhibiting JNK isoforms. The structure of the new compounds was generated from hybridization of two main moieties. The pyrimidinyl moiety from reported BRAFV600E inhibitors, and the pyrazole moiety from JNK isoforms inhibitors. The new final compounds were tested on BRAFV600E, JNK1, JNK2, and JNK3 to measure their kinases inhibitory effect. Compound 14c showed the highest activity on JNK isoforms and BRAFV600E with IC50 = 0.51 μM, 0.53 μM, 1.02 μM, 0.009 μM on JNK1, JNK2, JNK3,and BRAFV600E, respectively. All final compounds were tested over four cancer cell lines related to the target enzymes. Compound 14d showed the most potent activity on all tested cell lines with IC50 = 0.87 μM, 0.91, 0.42 μM and 0.63 μM on MOLT-4, K-562, SK-MEL-28, and A375 cell lines, respectively. The ability of 14d and 14c to inhibit MEK1/2 and ERK1/2 phosphorylation was performed by using western blot. The cell cycle analysis of compound 14d on A375 cell line revealed that compound 14d arrested cell growth at G0-G1 phase. Compound 14d remarkably decreased cell migration compared to control group in traditional migration test. Compounds 13a-f and 14a-f showed significant ability to inhibit nitric oxide release and PGE2 production on raw 264.7 macrophages. Compounds 13d and 14d exhibited high inhibitory effect on iNOS and COX-2 compared to COX-1. Finally, the effect of most potent compounds on TNF-alpha and IL-6 was determined.

An Overview of Liver Directed Locoregional Therapies

An overview of all liver-directed locoregional therapies, including surgical resection for melanoma liver metastases (MLMs), is provided. MLM patients are divided by their primary melanoma location; cutaneous, uvea (eye), and mucosal melanoma. If patients with isolated cutaneous MLMs are considered for surgical resection, treatment with systemic therapy should be part of the treatment course. For uveal MLMs, complete surgical or ablative treatment of all MLMs suggests superior results compared with other liver-directed or systemic therapies, based on current evidence, no recommendations for any liver-directed regional therapy in the treatment of mucosal MLMs can be made.

Drug-related macular edema: a real-world FDA Adverse Event Reporting System database study

PURPOSE

This study aims to assess the risks associated with drug-induced macular edema and to examine the epidemiological characteristics of this condition.

METHODS

This study analyzed data from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database from January 2004 to June 2024 to conduct a disproportionality analysis identifying drugs with positive signals of drug-induced ME. Additionally, the onset time of ME associated with these drugs was examined.

RESULTS

In the FAERS database, a total of 490 drugs were reported to pose a risk of drug-induced ME. Disproportional analysis and screening further identified 8 drugs that significantly increased this risk. Among these, one is ophthalmic drugs, including Latanoprost (ROR = 5.51), and ten are non-ophthalmic drugs, including Cefuroxime (ROR = 75.93), Fingolimod (ROR = 30.69), and Siponimod (ROR = 20.51).

CONCLUSIONS

This study utilizes the FAERS database to investigate potential associations between drug use and the occurrence of ME, rapidly identify drugs that may induce the condition, and propose research strategies. These findings hold significant value for guiding clinical medication practices.

Second-generation BRAF inhibitor Encorafenib resistance is regulated by NCOA4-mediated iron trafficking in the drug-resistant malignant melanoma cells

The current study established the first in vitro Encorafenib resistance protocol in BRAF-mutated malignant melanoma (MM) cells and investigated the resistance-related mechanisms. After establishing Encorafenib-resistant A375-MM cells, resistant-related mechanisms were investigated using WST-1, Annexin V, cell cycle, morphological analysis, live-cell, Western blot, RNA-Seq, transmission electron microscopy-(TEM), oxidative stress and iron colorimetric assay. The most resistant group, called A375-R, was determined in the cells treated with a constant dose of 10 nM over 3 months. The viability, apoptosis, and G0/G1 arrest reflected the acquired chemoresistance. Autophagic Beclin and LC3 proteins, and AKT signaling increased in the A375-R. RNA-Seq results also exhibited altered epigenetic regulation of resistance; particularly ferritin family members, ion transport pathways. Then, increased NCOA4, FTH1, and iron levels detected in A375-R suggest that the iron metabolism-related mechanism, such as ferritinophagy, might be triggered, which was supported by TEM and oxidative stress analysis. Iron storage, transport, and ferritinophagy have the promising potential to be targeted for combining with BRAF-targeted therapy to reverse Encorafenib resistance in MM. Moreover, this is the first study evaluating in vitro Encorafenib resistance mechanisms, and we suggest that our findings contribute to improving new drug combinations targeting BRAF and iron metabolism in different MM cells.

Advances in Immunotherapy and Targeted Therapy of Malignant Melanoma

Malignant melanoma (MM) is a malignant tumor, resulting from mutations in melanocytes of the skin and mucous membranes. Its mortality rate accounts for 90% of all dermatologic tumor mortality. Traditional treatments such as surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy are unable to achieve the expected results due to MM's low sensitivity, high drug resistance, and toxic side effects. As treatment advances, immunotherapy and targeted therapy have made significant breakthroughs in the treatment of MM and have demonstrated promising application prospects. However, the heterogeneity of tumor immune response causes more than half of patients to not benefit from clinical immunotherapy and targeted therapy, which delays the patient's condition and causes them to suffer adverse immune events' side effects. The combination of immunotherapy and targeted therapy can help improve therapeutic effects, delay drug resistance, and mitigate adverse effects. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the current development status and research progress of immune checkpoints, targeted genes, and their inhibitors, with a view to providing a reference for the clinical treatment of MM.

European consensus-based interdisciplinary guideline for melanoma. Part 2: Treatment - Update 2024

A unique collaboration of multi-disciplinary experts from the European Association of Dermato-Oncology (EADO), the European Dermatology Forum (EDF), and the European Organization of Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) was formed to make recommendations on cutaneous melanoma diagnosis and treatment, based on systematic literature reviews and the experts' experience. Cutaneous melanomas are excised with one to two-centimeter safety margins. For a correct stage classification and treatment decision, a sentinel lymph node biopsy shall be offered in patients with tumor thickness ≥ 1.0 mm or ≥ 0.8 mm with additional histological risk factors, although there is as yet no clear survival benefit for this approach. Therapeutic decisions should be primarily made by an interdisciplinary oncology team ("Tumor Board"). Adjuvant therapies can be proposed in completely resected stage IIB-IV. In stage II only PD-1 inhibitors are approved. In stage III anti-PD-1 therapy or dabrafenib plus trametinib for patients with BRAFV600 mutated melanoma can be discussed. In resected stage IV, nivolumab can be offered, as well as ipilimumab and nivolumab, in selected, high-risk patients. In patients with clinically detected macroscopic, resectable disease, neoadjuvant therapy with ipilimumab plus nivolumab followed complete surgical resection and adjuvant therapy according to pathological response and BRAF status can be offered. Neoadjuvant therapy with pembrolizumab followed by complete surgical resection and adjuvant pembrolizumab is also recommended. For patients with disease recurrence after (neo) adjuvant therapy, further treatment should consider the type of (neo) adjuvant therapy received as well as the time of recurrence, i.e., on or off therapy. In patients with irresectable stage III/IV disease systemic treatment is always indicated. For first line treatment PD-1 antibodies alone or in combination with CTLA-4 or LAG-3 antibodies shall be considered. In stage IV melanoma with a BRAFV600 mutation, first-line therapy with BRAF/MEK inhibitors can be offered as an alternative to immunotherapy, in selected cases. In patients with primary resistance to immunotherapy and harboring a BRAFV600 mutation, this therapy shall be offered as second line. Other second line therapies include therapy with tumor infiltrating lymphocytes and combinations of immune checkpoint inhibitors not used in first line. This guideline is valid until the end of 2026.

A comprehensive review of targeting RAF kinase in cancer

RAF kinases, particularly the BRAF isoform, play a crucial role in the MAPK/ERK signaling pathway, regulating key cellular processes such as proliferation, differentiation, and survival. Dysregulation of this pathway often caused by mutations in the BRAF gene or alterations in upstream regulators like Ras and receptor tyrosine kinases contributes significantly to cancer development. Mutations, such as BRAF-V600E, are present in a variety of malignancies, with the highest prevalence in melanoma. Targeted therapies against RAF kinases have achieved substantial success, especially in BRAF-V600E-mutant melanomas, where inhibitors like vemurafenib and dabrafenib have demonstrated remarkable efficacy, leading to improved patient outcomes. These inhibitors have also shown clinical benefits in cancers such as thyroid and colorectal carcinoma, although to a lesser extent. Despite these successes, therapeutic resistance remains a major hurdle. Resistance mechanisms, including RAF dimerization, feedback reactivation of the MAPK pathway, and paradoxical activation of ERK signaling, often lead to diminished efficacy over time, resulting in disease progression or even secondary malignancies. In response, current research is focusing on novel therapeutic strategies, including combination therapies that target multiple components of the pathway simultaneously, such as MEK inhibitors used in tandem with RAF inhibitors. Additionally, next-generation RAF inhibitors are being developed to address resistance and enhance therapeutic specificity. This review discusses the clinical advancements in RAF-targeted therapies, with a focus on ongoing efforts to overcome therapeutic resistance and enhance outcomes for cancer patients. It also underscores the persistent challenges in effectively targeting RAF kinase in oncology.

Inequalities in Drug Access for Advanced Melanoma: The Prognostic Impact Resulting From the Approval Delay of the Combined Ipilimumab/Nivolumab Treatment in Portugal

Introduction A combination of ipilimumab/nivolumab has demonstrated a median overall survival (mOS) of 71.9 months in advanced melanoma, establishing it as the standard first-line (1L) therapy. However, the approval of this combination by the Portuguese Regulatory Authority occurred 76 months after its approval by the European Authority, leaving tyrosine kinase inhibitors as the only 1L option available for the BRAF-mutated melanoma population. Our study aims to evaluate real-world data from patients with advanced melanoma and assess the potential prognostic impact of the delayed availability of ipilimumab/nivolumab combination therapy on this population. Methods This was an observational, retrospective cohort study conducted at a Portuguese Comprehensive Cancer Center. The study included adult patients with melanoma who received innovative therapies in the 1L between May 2016 and December 2021 and who would meet the criteria for treatment with ipilimumab/nivolumab. The primary outcome measure was mOS; secondary outcome measures included median progression-free survival (mPFS), objective response rate (ORR), and safety data. Results Our study included 172 patients, of which 50% were male, and 32.6% (n = 56) had BRAF-mutated melanoma. In 1L setting, 70.9% received anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (anti-PD-1) monotherapy, while the rest were treated with targeted therapies. The median follow-up time was 57 months. Patients treated with anti-PD-1 had ORR of 36.0%, mPFS of seven months (95% CI 2.9-11.1), and mOS of 19 months (95% CI 7.5-30.4). Among patients treated with targeted therapies, the ORR was 56.0%, mPFS seven months (95% CI 5.1-8.9), and mOS 14 months (95% CI 5.9-22.1). In our population, 10% presented grade 3 or higher adverse events, with no drug-related deaths reported. Conclusion These findings underscore significant disparities in access to innovative therapies in Portugal, which may have adversely impacted patients' outcomes. The delay raises ethical concerns regarding equity in healthcare access and highlights the need for policy measures to expedite the approval and availability of life-extending treatments.

The Olive Oil Monophenolic Secoiridoid Ligstroside Aglycone Suppresses Melanoma Progression by Targeting the BRAF Signaling Pathway

Melanoma is among the most abundant malignancies in the US and worldwide. Ligstroside aglycone (LA) is a rare extra-virgin olive oil-derived monophenolic secoiridoid with diverse bioactivities. LA dose-response screening at the NCI 60 cancer cells panel identified the high sensitivity of the Malme-3M cell line, which harbors a BRAF V600E mutation. Daily oral 10 mg/kg LA exhibited potent in vivo antitumor effects against Malme-3M cells xenograft in a nude mouse model by targeting the BRAF signaling pathway. A human Clariom S microarray analysis of the collected Malme- 3M tumors identified 571 dysregulated genes, with the downregulation of pathways critical for melanoma cells growth and survival. A Western blot analysis of the collected animal tumors further validated the downregulation of the mutated BRAF-MAPK axis, as well as the GPD1 and ELOVL6 expression levels. A histopathological analysis of Malme-3M tumor sections showed extensive focal tumor necrosis in treated mice. An immunofluorescence study of tumor sections showed notable reductions in proliferation marker ki67 and the vasculogenesis marker CD31 in treated tumors. These findings promote LA as a potential nutraceutical lead for the control of the BRAF V600E mutant melanoma.

National Trends in Healthcare Expenditures for the Management of Skin Cancer in the United States

BACKGROUND

Malignant melanoma and keratinocyte carcinomas account for a substantial proportion of healthcare expenditures in the United States.

OBJECTIVE

To estimate trends in the economic burden of skin cancer in the United States between 1996 and 2016.

METHODS

The Disease Expenditure Project and Global Burden of Disease databases were used to estimate annual total costs and population-standardized rates of change for skin cancer-related healthcare spending.

RESULTS

Skin cancer expenditures totaled $23.4 billion in 2016, of which $1.4 billion (95% CI: $1.3-$1.6 billion) was melanoma-related and $22 billion (95% CI: $18-$28 billion) was keratinocyte carcinoma-related. Most spending on skin cancer management occurred in ambulatory care settings [60.7% (95% CI: 57.7%-64.3%) for melanoma and 87.8% (95% CI: 87.2%-88.2%) for keratinocyte carcinoma]. Pharmaceutical costs for melanoma have increased since 2010 to $365 million (95% CI: $327-$416 million), which represents 26.1% (95% CI: 22.6%-29.3%) of total melanoma expenditure.

CONCLUSIONS

Skin cancer management in the United States is costly. Expenditures have increased substantially since 1996 without signs of plateauing in recent years.

The Evolving Role of Genomics in Colorectal Cancer

Approximately 75% of colorectal cancers (CRCs) harbour an identifiable driver mutation, 5% of which are heritable. These drivers have recognised implications for prognosis and therapy selection. In addition, potential germline mutations require investigations to inform testing of relatives, as well as surveillance for other malignancies. With increasing numbers of targeted drugs being approved, judicious testing is required to ensure sufficient tumour sample is available for testing and at the right point in the cancer pathway. Liquid biopsy with circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) in the blood presents an exciting adjunct to tumour tissue testing for molecular drivers, as well as escalation and de-escalation of therapy. Here, we review the most frequent molecular alterations in CRC, how genomic testing should be integrated into the treatment pathway for CRC, and sources of further education.

Specific BCG-related gene expression levels correlate with immune cell infiltration and prognosis in melanoma

Melanoma, caused by malignant melanocytes, is known for its invasiveness and poor prognosis. Therapies are often ineffective due to their heterogeneity and resistance. Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG), primarily a tuberculosis vaccine, shows potential in treating melanoma by activating immune responses. In this study, data from The Cancer Genome Atlas and the National Center for Biotechnology Information Gene Expression Omnibus database were utilized to determine pivotal DEGs such as DSC2, CXCR1, BOK, and CSTB, which are significantly upregulated in BCG-treated blood samples and are strongly associated with the prognosis of melanoma. We employ tools like edgeR and ggplot2 for functional and pathway analysis and develop a prognostic model using LASSO Cox regression analysis to predict patient survival. A notable finding is the correlation between BCG-related genes and immune cell infiltration in melanoma, highlighting the potential of these genes as both biomarkers and therapeutic targets. Additionally, the study examines genetic alterations in these genes and their impact on the disease. This study highlights the necessity of further exploring BCG-related genes for insights into melanoma pathogenesis and treatment enhancement, suggesting that BCG's role in immune activation could offer novel therapeutic avenues in cancer treatment.

Cutaneous adverse events associated with BRAF and MEK inhibitors: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Aim

Cutaneous adverse events (CAEs) after treatment with BRAF and MEK inhibitors in patients with melanoma remain incompletely characterized. To determine the association of BRAF and MEK inhibitor treatment with CAEs in patients with melanoma compared with BRAF inhibitor alone.

Method

PubMed, Cochrane, Embase and Web of Science were systematically searched for BRAF and MEK inhibitors from database inception through 10 May 2024. Randomized clinical trials reporting on CAEs in patients with melanoma being treated with BRAF and MEK inhibitors compared with patients with melanoma being treated with BRAF inhibitor monotherapy were selected. Pooled Risk ratios (RRs) and 95% CIs were determined using random-effects analyses. The selected end points were alopecia, cutaneous squamous-cell carcinoma, hyperkeratosis, keratoacanthoma, palmoplantar erythrodysaesthesia syndrome, palmoplantar keratoderma, rash, photosensitivity reaction, and skin papilloma. All-grade and high-grade (≥3) CAEs were recorded.

Results

Comparing with BRAF and MEK inhibitors, treatment with BRAF inhibitors alone was associated with an increased risk of rash (RR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.54-0.99; p = 0.039; I2 = 88%), alopecia (RR, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.20-0.41; P < 0.001; I2 = 76%), hyperkeratosis (RR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.22-0.41; P < 0.001; I2 = 56%), palmoplantar erythrodysaesthesia syndrome (RR, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.10-0.47; P < 0.001; I2 = 81%), palmoplantar keratoderma (RR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.26-0.57; P < 0.001; I2 = 29%), Skin papilloma (RR, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.12-0.52; P < 0.001; I2 = 77%), cutaneous squamous-cell carcinoma (RR, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.11-0.42; P < 0.001; I2 = 50%), and keratoacanthoma (RR, 0.22; 95% CI, 0.12-0.40; P < 0.001; I2 = 0%).

Conclusion

Therapy with BRAF and MEK inhibitors was associated with a lower risk of CAEs, especially rash, alopecia, hyperkeratosis, palmoplantar erythrodysaesthesia syndrome, palmoplantar keratoderma, skin papilloma, cutaneous squamous-cell carcinoma, and keratoacanthoma, compared with BRAF inhibitor alone. The risks of photosensitivity reaction was similar between the assessed groups. The findings may help to balance between beneficial melanoma treatment and cutaneous morbidity and mortality.

Precision Oncology in Melanoma: Changing Practices

Over the last 2 decades, significant progress has been made in our understanding of the genomics, tumor immune microenvironment, and immunogenicity of malignant melanoma. Historically, the prognosis for metastatic melanoma was poor because of limited treatment options. However, after multiple landmark clinical trials displaying the efficacy of combined BRAF/MEK inhibition for BRAF-mutant melanoma and the application of immune checkpoint inhibitors targeting the programmed death-1, cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4, and lymphocyte activation gene-3 molecules, overall survival rates have dramatically improved. The role of immune checkpoint inhibition has since expanded to the neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings with multiple regimens in routine use. Personalized therapies, including tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes that are extracted from a patient's melanoma and eventually reinfused into the patient, and messenger RNA vaccines used to target neoantigens unique to a patient's tumor, show promise. Improvements in accompanying imaging modalities, particularly within the field of nuclear medicine, have allowed for more accurate staging of disease and assessment of treatment response. Continued growth in the role of nuclear medicine in the evaluation of melanoma, including the incorporation of artificial intelligence into image interpretation and use of radiolabeled tracers allowing for intricate imaging of the tumor immune microenvironment, is expected in the coming years.

Current status of precision oncology in adult glioblastoma

The concept of precision oncology, the application of targeted drugs based on comprehensive molecular profiling, has revolutionized treatment strategies in oncology. This review summarizes the current status of precision oncology in glioblastoma (GBM), the most common and aggressive primary brain tumor in adults with a median survival below 2 years. Targeted treatments without prior target verification have consistently failed. Patients with BRAF V600E-mutated GBM benefit from BRAF/MEK-inhibition, whereas targeting EGFR alterations was unsuccessful due to poor tumor penetration, tumor cell heterogeneity, and pathway redundancies. Systematic screening for actionable molecular alterations resulted in low rates (< 10%) of targeted treatments. Efficacy was observed in one-third and currently appears to be limited to BRAF-, VEGFR-, and mTOR-directed treatments. Advancing precision oncology for GBM requires consideration of pathways instead of single alterations, new trial concepts enabling rapid and adaptive drug evaluation, a focus on drugs with sufficient bioavailability in the CNS, and the extension of target discovery and validation to the tumor microenvironment, tumor cell networks, and their interaction with immune cells and neurons.

Efficacy of Combined Encorafenib and Binimetinib Treatment for Erdheim-Chester Disease Harboring Concurrent BRAFV600E and KRASG12R Mutations: A Case Report

BACKGROUND

Erdheim-Chester disease (ECD) is a rare form of non-Langerhans cell histiocytosis with diverse clinical manifestations, often associated with mutations in the mitogen-activated protein kinase/extracellular signal-regulated kinase (MAPK/ERK) pathway. BRAF and KRAS mutations, which are driver mutations of oncogenes, participate in the same signaling pathway (MAPK/ERK pathway) and are usually mutually exclusive. We report a case of ECD with concurrent BRAFV600E and KRASG12R mutations treated using BRAF and MEK inhibitors.

CASE

A 70-year-old man was referred to our hospital with a mesenteric nodal lesion on computed tomography scan. The patient experienced symptoms consistent with ECD, including central diabetes insipidus. Biopsy revealed histiocytes positive for CD68 and CD163, negative for S100, CD1a, and CD21. Liquid-based comprehensive genomic profiling and tissue-based cancer gene panel test identified BRAFV600E and KRASG12R mutations with different variant allele fraction. Additional immunohistochemistry with an antibody specific to mutant BRAFV600E protein stained some proliferating histiocytes, consistent with ECD. Based on the genomic profiling results, we hypothesized that there was a coexistence of a clone harboring BRAFV600E and another clone harboring KRASG12R, and planned a combination therapy with BRAF and MEK inhibitors targeting each clone, respectively. The patient received oral encorafenib at 100 mg once daily and oral binimetinib at 15 mg twice daily. The combination therapy resulted in rapid resolution of symptoms and significant improvement in imaging findings.

CONCLUSION

This case represents a unique presentation of ECD with concurrent BRAFV600E and KRASG12R mutations. Combination therapy with encorafenib and binimetinib targeting each clone resulted in a remarkable therapeutic effect and was well-tolerated. This is the first reported case of ECD treated with encorafenib and binimetinib. The combination therapy with BRAF and MEK inhibitors is one of the rational treatment options for cases of ECD with a suspicion of multiple clones.

Multigene Copy Number Alteration Risk Score Biomarker-Based Enrichment Study Designs in Metastatic Castrate-Resistant Prostate Cancer

PURPOSE

A composite multigene risk score derived from tumor-biology alterations specific to metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) state was evaluated as a classifier to design biomarker-based enrichment clinical trials.

METHODS

A plasma cell-free DNA copy number alteration risk score based on alterations in 24 genes was simulated to develop a biomarker classifier-based clinical trial design enriched for high-risk patients to detect a survival advantage of a novel treatment (hazard ratio of 0.70 with 80% power). We determined the design trade-offs between the number of patients screened and enrolled when varying the type of patients to enrich and the extent of enrichment needed.

RESULTS

For a 2-year overall survival end point in mCRPC state, fully enriching patients with mCRPC having a high-risk score of 3 or more (the 95th percentile of a range of risk scores in patients with mCRPC) was determined to require screening to a maximum of 4,149 patients to enroll 259 patients for the targeted effect size. A nonenriched trial was determined to require enrolling 689 patients to be equivalently powered. We identified a pragmatic alternative, which is to enrich patients with mCRPC with a risk score of 1 or more (the 67th percentile) and an enrichment fraction of 0.25. This would require screening 658 patients to enroll 584 patients, and it maximizes the ability to detect a difference in treatment effect by risk score.

CONCLUSION

A plasma multi-CNA risk score classifier can feasibly be leveraged to design an enrichment trial in mCRPC. Enriching 25% of patients screened with a risk score >1 was observed to be optimal for obtaining an adequately powered, biomarker-based mCRPC-enriched clinical trial.

Safety and Efficacy Analysis of Targeted and Immune Combination Therapy in Advanced Melanoma-A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

The combinations of BRAF inhibitor-based targeted therapies with immune checkpoint inhibitors currently represent less common therapeutic approaches in advanced melanoma. The aim of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of currently available melanoma treatments by conducting a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Four databases were systematically searched for randomized clinical studies that included patients with advanced/metastatic melanoma receiving chemotherapy, immune checkpoint inhibitors, BRAF/MEK inhibitor therapy, or combinations thereof. The primary endpoints were treatment-related adverse events (TRAE), serious adverse events (SAE) of grade ≥ 3 adverse events, therapy discontinuation, progression-free survival (PFS), as well as objective response rate (ORR) and complete response rate (CRR). A total of 63 articles were eligible for our systematic review; 59 of them were included in the statistical analysis. A separate subgroup analysis was conducted to evaluate the efficacy outcomes, specifically in BRAF-positive patients. Triple combination therapy or triple therapy (inhibiting BRAF, MEK and PD1/PDL1 axis) showed significantly longer progression-free survival compared to BRAF + MEK combination therapies (HR = 0.76; 95% CI 0.64-0.9), but similar objective and complete response rates in BRAF-mutated melanoma. This safety analysis suggests that triple therapy is not inferior to combined immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) and BRAF/MEK therapies in terms of serious adverse events and therapy discontinuation rates. However, monotherapies and BRAF/MEK combinations showed notable advantage over triple therapy in terms of treatment-related adverse events. Combination strategies including BRAF/MEK-targeted therapies with ICI therapies are effective first-line options for advanced, BRAF-mutant melanoma; however, they are associated with more frequent side effects. Therefore, future RCTs are required to evaluate and identify high-risk subpopulations where triple therapy therapies should be considered.

The Role of Radiation, Immunotherapy, and Chemotherapy in the Management of Locally Advanced or Metastatic Cutaneous Malignancies

INTRODUCTION

Skin cancer impacts a significant proportion of the population. While surgical management is often the mainstay of treatment, advanced or metastatic cutaneous malignancies require additional local and/or systemic therapies.

METHODS

A review of the literature was performed studying the use of radiation therapy, chemotherapy, and immunotherapy for locally advanced or metastatic cutaneous malignancies.

RESULTS

A summary of the present literature on the management of locally advanced or metastatic cutaneous malignancies is presented across cutaneous head and neck basal cell carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, melanoma, and Merkel cell carcinoma. The addition of multidisciplinary therapies to resection is often associated with improved outcomes.

CONCLUSION

The management of cutaneous head and neck malignancies requires an approach integrating multiple specialties, to optimize outcomes and minimize toxicities.

RAS signaling in carcinogenesis, cancer therapy and resistance mechanisms

Variants in the RAS family (HRAS, NRAS and KRAS) are among the most common mutations found in cancer. About 19% patients with cancer harbor RAS mutations, which are typically associated with poor clinical outcomes. Over the past four decades, KRAS has long been considered an undruggable target due to the absence of suitable small-molecule binding sites within its mutant isoforms. However, recent advancements in drug design have made RAS-targeting therapies viable, particularly with the approval of direct KRASG12C inhibitors, such as sotorasib and adagrasib, for treating non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with KRASG12C mutations. Other KRAS-mutant inhibitors targeting KRASG12D are currently being developed for use in the clinic, particularly for treating highly refractory malignancies like pancreatic cancer. Herein, we provide an overview of RAS signaling, further detailing the roles of the RAS signaling pathway in carcinogenesis. This includes a summary of RAS mutations in human cancers and an emphasis on therapeutic approaches, as well as de novo, acquired, and adaptive resistance in various malignancies.

The evolution of BRAF-targeted therapies in melanoma: overcoming hurdles and unleashing novel strategies

Melanoma, a highly aggressive form of skin cancer, poses a significant global health burden, with 331,647 new cases and 58,645 deaths reported in 2022. The development of melanoma is influenced by various factors, including sunlight exposure and BRAFV600 mutations that activate the MAPK/ERK pathway. The introduction of BRAF and MEK inhibitors has revolutionized the treatment landscape for melanoma patients. However, innate and acquired therapeutic resistance remains a significant challenge. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the current state of BRAF-targeted therapies in melanoma, highlighting the efficacy and limitations of FDA-approved combinations of BRAF and MEK inhibitors such as vemurafenib, dabrafenib, trametinib, and cobimetinib. The review also explores the off-target effects of BRAF inhibitors on endothelial cells, emphasizing the need for more selective therapies to minimize vascular complications and metastatic potential. The article also discusses potential druggable targets, including ERK5, CD73, ALDH1A1, PLA1A, and DMKN, which are promising in addressing diagnostic hurdles and guiding personalized therapeutic decisions. Recent studies on regorafenib, ERK5 signaling, and CD73 inhibition are highlighted as novel strategies to overcome resistance and improve treatment outcomes. The review also delves into the role of advanced therapeutic tools, such as mRNA vaccines and CRISPR-Cas9, in revolutionizing personalized oncology by targeting specific genetic mutations and enhancing immune responses against melanoma. The ongoing synergy between advancing research, targeted interventions, strategic treatment combinations, and cost-effectiveness evaluations offers a promising pathway to elevate patient outcomes in the persistent battle against melanoma significantly.

Expert consensus on the diagnosis and treatment of solid tumors with BRAF mutations

The BRAF gene is an important signaling molecule in human cells that is involved in the regulation of cell growth, differentiation, and survival. When the BRAF gene mutates, it can lead to abnormal activation of the signaling pathway, which promotes cell proliferation, inhibits cell apoptosis, and ultimately contributes to the occurrence and development of cancer. BRAF mutations are widely present in various cancers, including malignant melanoma, thyroid cancer, colorectal cancer, non-small cell lung cancer, and hairy cell leukemia, among others. BRAF is an important target for the treatment of various solid tumors, and targeted combination therapies, represented by BRAF inhibitors, have become one of the main treatment modalities for a variety of BRAF-mutation-positive solid tumors. Dabrafenib plus trametinib, as the first tumor-agnostic therapy, has been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of adult and pediatric patients aged 6 years and older harboring a BRAF V600E mutation with unresectable or metastatic solid tumors that have progressed following prior treatment and who have no satisfactory alternative treatment options. This is also the first time a BRAF/MEK inhibitor combination has been approved for use in pediatric patients. As research into the diagnosis and treatment of BRAF mutations advances, standardizing the detection of BRAF mutations and the clinical application of BRAF inhibitors becomes increasingly important. Therefore, we have established a universal and systematic strategy for diagnosing and treating solid tumors with BRAF mutations. In this expert consensus, we (1) summarize the epidemiology and clinical characteristics of BRAF mutations in different solid tumors, (2) provide recommendations for the selection of genetic testing methods and platforms, and (3) establish a universal strategy for the diagnosis and treatment of patients with solid tumors harboring BRAF mutations.

Impact on Survival with Immunotherapy and Evaluation of Biomarkers in Peruvian Patients with Advanced Melanoma

INTRODUCTION

Advanced malignant melanoma is a very aggressive disease, historically with poor prognosis before the new advances with immunotherapy and targeted therapies that have changed the standard of care, especially in cutaneous melanoma. Peru has aggressive features such as higher rates of acral lentiginous melanoma (ALM) subtype with historically shorter survival.

METHODS

This study describes Peruvian patients with advanced melanoma treated with immunotherapy (nivolumab) in two oncological institutions (public and private), including the discussion of the impact on overall survival (OS) divided by subtype (with incidence in ALM histology) and potential biomarkers that could be related to prognosis.

RESULTS

We found that immunotherapy is safe, and improves progression-free survival (PFS), OS and objective response rate (ORR) in our patients, with lower benefit in ALM histology. No prognostic blood inflammatory biomarkers were detected.

DISCUSSION

There is very limited data of Peruvian patients with metastatic melanoma treated with immunotherapy, especially the outcomes in ALM histology. Our goal is to share an example of the impact of immunotherapy in a Latin American (LATAM) population considered as an unsatisfied group with an enormous need of novel treatments and biomarkers.

Risk Stratification, Screening and Treatment of BRAF/MEK Inhibitors-Associated Cardiotoxicity

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

In this review article we describe the cardiovascular adverse events associated with BRAF and MEK inhibitors as well as their pathophysiologic mechanisms and provide up to date guidance for risk stratified surveillance of patients on treatment and the optimal management of emergent cardiotoxicities.

RECENT FINDINGS

Combination BRAF/MEK inhibition has become an established standard treatment option for patients with a wide variety of BRAF mutant haematological and solid organ cancers, its use is most commonly associated with stage three and metastatic melanoma. The introduction of these targeted drugs has significantly improved the prognosis of previously treatment resistant cancers. It is increasingly recognised that these drugs have a number of cardiovascular toxicities including left ventricular systolic dysfunction, hypertension and QTc interval prolongation. Whilst cardiotoxicity is largely reversible and manageable with medical therapy, it does limit the effective use of these highly active agents.