Lurbinectedin as second-line treatment for patients with small-cell lung cancer: a single-arm, open-label, phase 2 basket trial

A Phase I First-in-Human Study of ABBV-011, a Seizure-Related Homolog Protein 6-Targeting Antibody-Drug Conjugate, in Patients with Small Cell Lung Cancer

PURPOSE

Seizure-related homolog protein 6 (SEZ6) is a novel target expressed in small cell lung cancer (SCLC). ABBV-011, a SEZ6-targeted antibody conjugated to calicheamicin, was evaluated in a phase I study (NCT03639194) in patients with relapsed/refractory SCLC. We report initial outcomes of ABBV-011 monotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

ABBV-011 was administered intravenously once every 3 weeks during dose escalation (0.3-2 mg/kg) and expansion. Patients with SEZ6-positive tumors (≥25% of tumor cells with ≥1+ staining intensity by IHC) were preselected for expansion. Safety, tolerability, antitumor activity, and pharmacokinetics were evaluated.

RESULTS

As of August 2022, 99 patients received ABBV-011 monotherapy [dose escalation, n = 36; Japanese dose evaluation, n = 3; dose expansion, n = 60 (1 mg/kg, n = 40)]; the median age was 63 years (range, 41-79 years). Also, 32%, 41%, and 26% of patients received 1, 2, and ≥3 prior therapies, respectively. The maximum tolerated dose was not reached through 2.0 mg/kg. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events were fatigue (50%), nausea (42%), and thrombocytopenia (41%). The most common hepatic treatment-emergent adverse events were increased aspartate aminotransferase (22%), increased γ-glutamyltransferase (21%), and hyperbilirubinemia (17%); two patients experienced veno-occlusive liver disease. The objective response rate was 19% (19/98). In the 1-mg/kg dose-expansion cohort (n = 40), the objective response rate was 25%; the median response duration was 4.2 months (95% confidence interval, 2.6-6.7); and the median progression-free survival was 3.5 months (95% confidence interval, 1.5-4.2).

CONCLUSIONS

ABBV-011 1.0 mg/kg every 3 weeks monotherapy was well tolerated and demonstrated encouraging antitumor activity in heavily pretreated patients with relapsed/refractory SCLC. SEZ6 is a promising novel SCLC target and warrants further investigation.

Recent advances in immunotherapy for small cell lung cancer

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review aims to provide an overview of recent advances in immunotherapy for small cell lung cancer (SCLC), with a focus on the current status of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), novel combination strategies, and key biomarkers.

RECENT FINDINGS

The integration of ICIs into standard chemotherapy has established them as the first-line treatment for extensive-stage SCLC (ES-SCLC). The ADRIATIC trial further demonstrated the efficacy of ICI maintenance therapy in limited-stage SCLC. Additionally, combining radiotherapy with ICIs has shown promising synergistic effects, including the abscopal and radscopal effects. Ongoing investigations into the combination of ICIs with targeted therapies, such as antiangiogenic agents and DNA damage response inhibitors, have yielded encouraging preliminary results. Notably, the novel therapeutic agent tarlatamab, the first bispecific DLL3-directed CD3 T-cell engager, has recently received FDA approval for second-line treatment of ES-SCLC. Advances in omics technologies have shed light on the intra-tumor and inter-tumor heterogeneity of SCLC, leading to the identification of new molecular subtypes and biomarkers, thereby paving the way for precision medicine.

SUMMARY

Despite the improved outcomes associated with immunotherapy in SCLC, the overall clinical benefit remains modest. Further preclinical and clinical studies are essential to identify optimal treatment regimens and enhance therapeutic efficacy.

Efficacy and toxicity of lurbinectedin in subsequent systemic therapy of extensive-stage small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to systematically analyze the efficacy and toxicity of lurbinectedin as a second-line or subsequent treatment for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC).

METHODS

Candidate studies were identified in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, CNKI, and Wanfang databases up to 1 May 2024. Objective remission rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events (AEs) were extracted, respectively. The efficacy and toxicity of lurbinectedin in ES-SCLC were analyzed by meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Six eligible prospective studies were included in this meta-analysis, including 536 patients with ES-SCLC who received second-line or subsequent treatment. In pooled analysis, the ORR of lurbinectedin was 35% (95% confidence interval [CI] 29-41), DCR was 67% (95%CI 58-76), DOR was 5.33 months (95%CI 4.51-6.16), PFS was 3.38 months (95%CI 2.59-4.17), and OS was 7.49 months (95%CI 5.11-9.87). The incidence of AEs and severe adverse events (SAEs) was 92% (95%CI 78-100) and 37% (95%CI 19-57), respectively. The most common AEs were leukopenia, neutropenia, anemia, and thrombocytopenia, with incidences of 81% (68-91), 74% (57-88), 73% (35-98) and 57% (46-68), respectively.

CONCLUSION

As a promising alternative for second-line treatment for ES-SCLC, lurbinectedin has a certain level of efficacy and a favorable safety profile. The integration of lurbinectedin with other therapeutic modalities presents an emerging area warranting further investigation.

Review of real-world experience with lurbinectedin in relapsed/refractory small cell lung cancer

Lurbinectedin, a novel antineoplastic agent, was granted the orphan drug designation by the United States Food and Drug Administration (US FDA) and approved for use in relapsed/refractory small cell lung cancer in June 2020. The approval was granted after its efficacy was demonstrated in a multicenter open-label, multi-cohort study enrolling 105 participants. Since then, real-world studies have examined the efficacy and safety profiles of lurbinectedin in clinical practice. By examining these outcomes, this review aims to provide clinicians with the tools necessary to make informed clinical decisions.

Real-World Outcomes with Lurbinectedin in Second Line and Beyond for Extensive Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer in Korea

Purpose

Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) accounts for approximately 10-15% of all lung cancers and is characterized by a high recurrence rate, early metastasis, and poor prognosis. Before the FDA approved lurbinectedin for SCLC that progressed on or after platinum-based chemotherapy in 2020, topotecan was the sole second-line option associated with hematological toxicities and modest efficacy. Lurbinectedin received conditional approval in Korea in September 2022 for metastatic SCLC progression, with the same indications. Real-world data on its efficacy remains scarce owing to its recent implementation.

Patients and Methods

Patients with metastatic SCLC who progressed on or after first-line therapy (n = 51) at Yonsei Cancer Center, Seoul, received lurbinectedin at 3.2 mg/m². Efficacy data, including tumor response, progression, survival, and demographics, were recorded.

Results

A total of fifty-one patients received lurbinectedin between April 2023 and March 2024, with thirty-four patients being eligible for the assessment. At diagnosis, approximately one-third of the patients were female, 3% had a poor performance status with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Score (ECOG PS ≥ 2), and the median age was 68. Most patients (80%) had extensive disease. Overall objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were 20% and 47%, respectively. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 2.8 months, and the median overall survival (OS) was 3.3 months. Never smokers showed prolonged OS compared with current/former smokers (Smokers; 3.0 vs 7.3 months). Common adverse effects were nausea (53%), loss of appetite (24%), general weakness (18%), anemia (29%), neutropenia (12%), dizziness (6%), alopecia (6%), thrombocytopenia (3%), and pneumonia (3%). Overall, 24% of the patients experienced grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs), with the most common being anemia (9%) and neutropenia (9%).

Conclusion

Real-world data suggest that lurbinectedin is a viable option for patients with SCLC who have progressed on or after platinum-based chemotherapy.

Strategies to Target Chemoradiotherapy Resistance in Small Cell Lung Cancer

Background: Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a lethal form of lung cancer with few treatment options and a high rate of relapse. While SCLC is initially sensitive to first-line DNA-damaging chemo- and radiotherapy, relapse disease is almost universally therapy-resistant. As a result, there has been interest in understanding the mechanisms of therapeutic resistance in this disease. Conclusions: Progress has been made in elucidating these mechanisms, particularly as they relate to the DNA damage response and SCLC differentiation and transformation, leading to many clinical trials investigating new therapies and combinations. Yet there remain many gaps in our understanding, such as the effect of epigenetics or the tumor microenvironment on treatment response, and no single mechanism has been found to be ubiquitous, suggesting a significant heterogeneity in the mechanisms of acquired resistance. Nevertheless, the advancement of techniques in the laboratory and the clinic will improve our ability to study this disease, especially in patient populations, and identify methods to surmount therapeutic resistance.

Sustained Clinical Benefit and Intracranial Activity of Tarlatamab in Previously Treated Small Cell Lung Cancer: DeLLphi-300 Trial Update

Clinical trials frequently include multiple end points that mature at different times. The initial report, typically based on the primary end point, may be published when key planned co-primary or secondary analyses are not yet available. Clinical Trial Updates provide an opportunity to disseminate additional results from studies, published in JCO or elsewhere, for which the primary end point has already been reported.Tarlatamab, a bispecific T-cell engager immunotherapy targeting delta-like ligand 3, has shown durable anticancer activity and manageable safety in previously treated small cell lung cancer (SCLC) in DeLLphi-300 phase I and DeLLphi-301 phase II trials. Here, we report extended follow-up of DeLLphi-300 (median follow-up, 12.1 months [range, 0.2-34.3]) in fully enrolled cohorts treated with tarlatamab ≥10 mg dose administered once every two weeks, once every three weeks, or once on day 1 and once on day 8 of a 21-day cycle (N = 152). Overall, the objective response rate (ORR) was 25.0%; the median duration of response (mDOR) was 11.2 months (95% CI, 6.6 to 22.3), and the median overall survival (mOS) was 17.5 months (95% CI, 11.4 to not estimable [NE]). Among 17 patients receiving 10 mg tarlatamab once every two weeks, the ORR was 35.3%, the mDOR was 14.9 months (95% CI, 3.0 to NE), the mOS was 20.3 months (95% CI, 5.1 to NE), and 29.4% had sustained disease control with time on treatment ≥52 weeks. No new safety signals were identified. In modified Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology Brain Metastases analyses, CNS tumor shrinkage of ≥30% was observed in 62.5% of patients (10 of 16) who had a baseline CNS lesion of ≥10 mm, including in a subset of patients with tumor shrinkage long after previous brain radiotherapy. In DeLLphi-300 extended follow-up, tarlatamab demonstrated unprecedented survival and potential findings of intracranial activity in previously treated SCLC.

Neuroendocrine transdifferentiation in human cancer: molecular mechanisms and therapeutic targets

Neuroendocrine transdifferentiation (NEtD), also commonly referred to as lineage plasticity, emerges as an acquired resistance mechanism to molecular targeted therapies in multiple cancer types, predominately occurs in metastatic epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant non-small cell lung cancer treated with EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors and metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer treated with androgen receptor targeting therapies. NEtD tumors are the lethal cancer histologic subtype with unfavorable prognosis and limited treatment. A comprehensive understanding of molecular mechanism underlying targeted-induced plasticity could greatly facilitate the development of novel therapies. In the past few years, increasingly elegant studies indicated that NEtD tumors share key the convergent genomic and phenotypic characteristics irrespective of their site of origin, but also embrace distinct change and function of molecular mechanisms. In this review, we provide a comprehensive overview of the current understanding of molecular mechanism in regulating the NEtD, including genetic alterations, DNA methylation, histone modifications, dysregulated noncoding RNA, lineage-specific transcription factors regulation, and other proteomic alterations. We also provide the current management of targeted therapies in clinical and preclinical practice.

FZ-AD005, a Novel DLL3-Targeted Antibody-Drug Conjugate with Topoisomerase I Inhibitor, Shows Potent Antitumor Activity in Preclinical Models

Delta-like ligand 3 (DLL3) is overexpressed in small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and has been considered an attractive target for SCLC therapy. Rovalpituzumab tesirine was the first DLL3-targeted antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) to enter clinical studies. However, serious adverse events limited progress in the treatment of SCLC with rovalpituzumab tesirine. In this study, we developed a novel DLL3-targeted ADC, FZ-AD005, by using DXd with potent cytotoxicity and a relatively better safety profile to maximize the therapeutic index. FZ-AD005 was generated by a novel anti-DLL3 antibody, FZ-A038, and a valine-alanine (Val-Ala) dipeptide linker to conjugate DXd. Moreover, Fc-silencing technology was introduced in FZ-AD005 to avoid off-target toxicity mediated by FcγRs and showed negligible Fc-mediated effector functions in vitro. In preclinical evaluation, FZ-AD005 exhibited DLL3-specific binding and demonstrated efficient internalization, bystander killing, and excellent in vivo antitumor activities in cell line-derived xenograft and patient-derived xenograft models. FZ-AD005 was stable in circulation with acceptable pharmacokinetic profiles in cynomolgus monkeys. FZ-AD005 was well tolerated in rats and monkeys. The safety profile of FZ-AD005 was favorable, and the highest nonseverely toxic dose was 30 mg/kg in cynomolgus monkeys. In conclusion, FZ-AD005 has the potential to be a superior DLL3-targeted ADC with a wide therapeutic window and is expected to provide clinical benefits for the treatment of patients with SCLC.

Small cell lung cancer profiling: an updated synthesis of subtypes, vulnerabilities, and plasticity

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a devastating disease with high proliferative and metastatic capacity. SCLC has been classified into molecular subtypes based on differential expression of lineage-defining transcription factors. Recent studies have proposed new subtypes that are based on both tumor-intrinsic and -extrinsic factors. SCLC demonstrates substantial intratumoral subtype heterogeneity characterized by highly plastic transcriptional states, indicating that the initially dominant subtype can shift during disease progression and in association with resistance to therapy. Strategies to promote or constrain plasticity and cell fate transitions have nominated novel targets that could prompt the development of more durably effective therapies for patients with SCLC. In this review, we describe the latest advances in SCLC subtype classification and their biological and clinical implications.

The Use of Lurbinectedin for the Treatment of Small Cell and Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of the Prostate

INTRODUCTION

Lurbinectedin is FDA approved for treatment of metastatic small cell lung cancer (SCLC) following progression on or after platinum-based chemotherapy. Prostatic small cell or neuroendocrine carcinoma (SC/NEPC) behaves like SCLC; however, no safety or efficacy data for lurbinectedin in SC/NEPC exists.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

All SC/NEPC patients treated with lurbinectedin across 4 academic oncology centers were identified. Baseline patient data and lurbinectedin outcomes including radiographic responses (complete response [CR], partial response [PR], stable disease [SD], progressive disease [PD]), progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and treatment-related adverse events (trAEs) were described. Clinical benefit rate (CBR) included CR, PR, or SD on imaging. Descriptive statistics were performed.

RESULTS

At first lurbinectedin dose, all 18 patients had metastatic disease. Median age was 63.5 (Range: 53-84), number of prior systemic therapies was 4 (Range: 2-7), and lurbinectedin cycles completed was 5 (Range: 1-10). ADT was administered during lurbinectedin treatment in 9/18 patients. CBR was 9/16 (56%). The most common trAEs were fatigue and anemia. Median OS and PFS were 6.01 (0.23-16.69) and 3.35 (0.16-7.79) months.

CONCLUSIONS

Lurbinectedin showed modest but significant clinical benefit in some patients with SC/NEPC and demonstrated an acceptable toxicity profile with no hospitalizations from trAEs. SC/NEPC is an aggressive disease with a poor prognosis for which more treatment options are needed. Evidence for subsequent treatments after platinum-based chemotherapy is lacking. Lurbinectedin is an active treatment option for SC/NEPC; however, larger confirmatory studies are needed.

Anlotinib plus oral fluoropyrimidine S-1 in refractory or relapsed small-cell lung cancer (SALTER TRIAL): a multicenter, single-arm, phase II trial

BACKGROUND

Patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) have few treatment options and dismal overall survival (OS) after failed platinum-based chemotherapy.

METHODS

The eligibility criteria of this phase II clinical trial included patients with measurable disease, age of 18 to 75 years, a confirmed diagnosis of disease progression or recurrence after prior platinum-based chemotherapy with a pathologically proven diagnosis of SCLC. Patients were treated with anlotinib at a dosage of 12 mg once daily (QD) and S-1 at 60 mg twice daily (BID) for 2 weeks, followed by a 1-week treatment-free interval. After six cycles of the above treatment, patients continued the maintenance therapy using S-1 monotherapy at 60 mg/ BID for 2 weeks, followed by a 1-week treatment-free interval until disease progression.

RESULTS

From March 2019 to June 2020, a total of 71 patients were initially assessed for eligibility in this study. Out of these, 52 patients who met the inclusion criteria were enrolled, and 48 patients received at least two doses of the study drug. The median follow-up time was 25.1 months. The ORR was seen in 21 patients (43.8%). The median PFS was 4.5 months (95% CI, 3.5-5.5 months), and the median OS was 5.9 months (95% CI, 4.6-7.3 months). The most common grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events were thrombocytopenia (16.7%), anemia (14.6%), neutropenia (14.6%), and hypertension (10.4%). No treatment-related death occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of anlotinib with oral fluoropyrimidine S-1 demonstrated notable activity in relapsed or refractory SCLC, showing a favorable ORR and an acceptable, manageable safety profile.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This trial was registered with ClinicalTrial.gov (NCT03823118) on 3 January 2019.

Efficacy of carboplatin-etoposide rechallenge after first-line chemo-immunotherapy in ES-SCLC: an international multicentric analysis

Background and objectives

Second-line treatment for small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is primarily guided by the time elapsed since the last platinum dose. Rechallenge with carboplatin and etoposide has demonstrated superior outcomes compared to topotecan if the platinum-free interval (PFI) is longer than 90 days and is considered the standard of care. However, these findings predate the chemo-immunotherapy era. This study investigates the effectiveness of the rechallenge strategy after chemo-immunotherapy in a real-world setting.

Design and methods

We retrospectively reviewed patients with the extensive stage (ES)-SCLC who received rechallenge with carboplatin and etoposide after first-line chemoimmunotherapy between September 2020 and August 2023 in nine European centres. Demographic and clinical data were collected and analysed.

Results

A total of 93 patients were included. Sixty-six (71%) patients had a PFI between 3 and 6 months. Consolidation thoracic radiotherapy and prophylactic cranial irradiation had been administered in 31 (33.3%) patients and 20 (21.5%) patients, respectively. Overall response rate was 59.1%. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 5 months (95% confidence interval (CI) 4.3-5.7) and median overall survival (OS) was 7 months (95% CI 5.7-8.3). Notably, PFS and OS were not different according to PFI (3-6 m vs > 6 m).

Conclusion

Rechallenge with carboplatin and etoposide is a valid second-line option in patients with ES-SCLC whose disease progresses after first-line chemoimmunotherapy. Our analysis shows similar results to previous studies. Furthermore, outcomes were consistent across patients with different PFIs, confirming its efficacy in patients with a PFI longer than 3 months.

Synthesis and biological evaluation of novel penindolone derivatives as potential antiproliferative agents against SCLC in vitro

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) keeps on the leading cause of cancer mortality world widely, while there is lack of efficient therapeutic drugs especially for the resistant ones. In this work, a compound named penindolone (PND) with new skeleton was found to show weak inhibitory effect (IC50 = 42.5 µM) on H69AR cells (SCLC, adriamycin-resistant) proliferation by screening our in-house compound library. With the aim of improving its low potency, a series of PND derivatives were synthesized and biologically evaluated by the Sulforhodamine B (SRB) assay. Among all tested derivatives, compound 5h possessed higher antiproliferation potency (IC50 = 1.6 µM). Furthermore, preliminary mechanism investigation revealed that 5h was able to induce apoptosis and arrest the cell cycle at G0/G1 phase. These findings suggest that this novel skeleton has expanded the anti-SCLC compound reservoir and provided a new drug lead.

A Phase I/II Study of Valemetostat (DS-3201b), an EZH1/2 Inhibitor, in Combination with Irinotecan in Patients with Recurrent Small-Cell Lung Cancer

PURPOSE

Recurrent small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) has few effective treatments. The EZH2-SLFN11 pathway is a driver of acquired chemoresistance that may be targeted.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This phase I/II trial investigated valemetostat, an EZH1/2 inhibitor, with fixed-dose irinotecan in patients with recurrent SCLC. Phase I primary objectives were to assess safety, tolerability, and a recommended phase II dose (RP2D). The phase II primary objective was overall response rate (ORR), with secondary objectives of determining duration of response (DoR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Correlative analyses included immunohistochemistry of pretreatment and on-treatment tumor biopsies and pharmacokinetics analysis.

RESULTS

Twenty-two patients were enrolled (phase I, n = 12; phase II, n = 10); one withdrew consent prior to treatment. Three dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) in dose-escalation resulted in valemetostat 100 mg orally daily selected as RP2D. Among 21 evaluable patients, the most frequent (≥20%) treatment-related adverse events were diarrhea, fatigue, nausea, and rash; three patients discontinued treatment for toxicity. Three of the first 10 patients in phase II experienced DLTs triggering a stopping rule. The ORR was 4/19 or 21% [95% confidence interval (CI), 6%-46%]. The median DoR, PFS, and OS were 4.6 months, 2.2 months (95% CI, 1.3-7.6 months), and 6.6 months (95% CI, 4.3 to not reached), respectively. SLFN11/EZH2 expression and SCLC subtyping markers did not correlate with response, but MHC-I expression did increase with treatment. Two responders demonstrated subtype switching on treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Combination valemetostat and irinotecan was not tolerated but demonstrated efficacy in recurrent SCLC. Valemetostat, combined with agents without overlapping toxicity, warrants further investigation in SCLC.

Phase Ib/II study on the safety, tolerability, and preliminary efficacy of pegylated irinotecan (JK1201I) as second-line monotherapy for patients with small-cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

To evaluate the safety, tolerability, and preliminary efficacy of multiple doses of pegylated irinotecan (JK1201I) as a second-line monotherapy for treating small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients.

METHODS

According to the "3 + 3" dose-escalation principle, patients received intravenous JK1201I at 180 or 220 mg/m2 once every 3 weeks for four cycles. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), median progression-free survival (mPFS), and median overall survival (mOS) were evaluated. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to analyze PFS and overall OS. Brookmeyer and Crowley's method was used for mPFS and mOS.

RESULTS

This study included 29 patients with stage III-IV SCLC (stage IIIa, n = 1; stage IIIb, n = 1; and stage IV, n = 27). Of these, 26 patients were enrolled in the 180 mg/m2 dose group, and 3 patients were enrolled in the 220 mg/m2 dose group. No dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was noted during the first 28 days of treatment. Grade 3 or higher adverse events were recorded in the 180 mg/m2 group, including diarrhea (11.5%, 3/26), neutropenia (7.7%, 2/26), and leukopenia (7.7%, 2/26). In the 220 mg/m2 group, one patient (33.3%, 1/3) experienced neutropenia or leukopenia. In the 180 mg/m2 group, 38.5% (10/26) of patients achieved an objective response rate (ORR), with a disease control rate (DCR) of 73.1% (19/26). The mPFS and mOS were 3.4 and 12.1 months, respectively. In the 220 mg/m2 group, one patient had stable disease, and one had progressive disease (PD). The ORR, DCR, mPFS, and mOS were 0% (0/3) and 33.3% (1/3), 2.7 months and 2.7 months, respectively.

CONCLUSION

JK1201I exhibits promising efficacy and relatively low toxicities as a second-line monotherapy for SCLC, warranting further large-scale clinical studies to evaluate its efficacy in greater detail.

Phase 2 dose-ranging study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of liposomal irinotecan (LY01610) as a second-line treatment for patients with relapsed small cell lung cancer

Background

This was a multicenter, single-arm dose-ranging phase 2 study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of LY01610, a liposomal irinotecan, at various doses for patients with relapsed small cell lung cancer (SCLC).

Methods

This study (NCT04381910) enrolled patients with relapsed SCLC at 10 hospitals across China, who have failed with previous platinum-based treatments. LY01610 was administered at doses of 60 mg/m2, 80 mg/m2, and 100 mg/m2. Primary endpoints were investigator-assessed objective response rate (ORR) and investigator-assessed duration of response (DoR). Secondary endpoints included investigator-assessed disease control rate (DCR), investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety.

Findings

From September 3, 2020 to March 3, 2022, a total of 66 patients were enrolled, with 6, 30, and 30 allocated to the 60 mg/m2, 80 mg/m2, and 100 mg/m2 dose groups, respectively, with 68% (45/66) having a chemotherapy-free interval <90 days. In all 66 patients, the ORR was 32% (21/66, 95% confidence interval [CI], 21-44), with a median DoR of 5.2 months (95% CI, 3.0-8.3). Median PFS and OS were 4.0 (95% CI, 2.9-5.5) and 9.7 (95% CI, 7.2-12.3) months, respectively. The ORR of 60 mg/m2, 80 mg/m2, and 100 mg/m2 dose group were 33% (2/6), 33% (10/30), and 30% (9/30), respectively. The median DoR of 60 mg/m2, 80 mg/m2, and 100 mg/m2 dose group were 4.2 (95% CI, 2.8-not reached), 6.9 (95% CI, 2.5-9.9), and 4.0 (95% CI, 2.7-6.8) months, respectively. The incidence of ≥ grade 3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) in the 60 mg/m2, 80 mg/m2, and 100 mg/m2 dose group were 33% (2/6), 47% (14/30), and 50% (15/30), respectively. The most common ≥ grade 3 TRAEs of all 66 patients were neutropenia (27%), leukopenia (24%) and anemia (15%).

Interpretation

LY01610 exhibited promising clinical efficacy and manageable safety profiles in patients with relapsed SCLC, the 80 mg/m2 dose group had the best benefit-risk ratio.

Funding

This study was supported by Luye Pharma Group Ltd.

Phase I/II trial of plinabulin in combination with nivolumab and ipilimumab in patients with recurrent small cell lung cancer (SCLC): Big ten cancer research consortium (BTCRC-LUN17-127) study

BACKGROUND

Plinabulin is a GEF-H1 releasing agent with an immune-enhancing function. We report results from a multicenter Phase I/II study (NCT03575793) assessing plinabulin in combination with nivolumab and ipilimumab for the treatment of recurrent SCLC.

METHODS

In Phase I, patients were enrolled using a 3 + 3 design to determine dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) and recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D). Patients received nivolumab (1 mg/kg), ipilimumab (3 mg/kg), and plinabulin (in escalating doses) on day 1 of each 21-day cycle for 4 cycles followed by maintenance with plinabulin and nivolumab. In phase II, patients with recurrent PD(L)1 inhibitor resistant SCLC were enrolled. The primary objective was median progression-free survival (PFS).

RESULTS

Between 9/2018 and 2/2023, 39 patients were enrolled, and 36 patients received study treatment and were evaluable for safety (16 in Phase I; 20 in Phase II). In the phase I dose-escalation, there were 2 DLTs; grade 3 altered mental status lasting <24 h and grade 3 infusion reaction. The Plinabulin RP2D was determined to be 30 mg/m2. Common TRAEs were vomiting (44 %), nausea (42 %), and infusion reaction (36 %); 6 % of patients had a ≥grade 3 TRAE. Five patients (14 %) had ≥grade 3 irAEs; there were no cases of immune-related pneumonitis. In the efficacy analysis in 27 patients, the median PFS was 1.6 months (95 % CI 1.2 to 2.7) and the trial did not meet the pre-specified target median PFS of 3.5 months. Four patients treated at 30 mg/m2 had PR (confirmed 1, unconfirmed 3); 5 patients had SD with a CBR of 33 %. Two of 8 patients treated in phase I at the lower 20 mg/m2 dose had confirmed PR, with 1 patient on the drug regimen for >90 cycles. The median OS and follow-up time were 5.5 months and 2.5 months respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Plinabulin in combination with nivolumab and ipilimumab was tolerable at the dose of 30 mg/m2. While the clinical responses in PD-1 resistant SCLC were limited, some patients had a long duration of response. The number of ≥grade 3 irAE with the combination were lower than expected.

Challenges and future perspectives for the use of temozolomide in the treatment of SCLC

Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC), accounting for 10-20 % of all lung tumors, represents the most aggressive high-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma. Most patients are diagnosed with extensive-stage SCLC (ES-SCLC), with brian metastases identified in ∼ 80 % of cases during the disease cours, and the prognosis is dismal, with a 5-year survival rate of less than 5 %. Current available treatments in the second-line setting are limited, and topotecan has long been the only FDA-approved drug in relapsed or refractory ES-SCLC, until the recent approval of lurbinectedin, a selective inhibitor of RNA polymerase II. Temozolomide (TMZ) is an oral alkylating agent, which showed single-agent activity in SCLC, particularly among patients with O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation. Several studies have revealed the synergistic activity of temozolomide with poly-ADP-ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors, that prevent repair of TMZ-induced DNA damage. This review focuses on the rationale for the use of TMZ in ES-SCLC and provides an overview of the main trials that have evaluated and are currently investigating its role, both as a single-agent and in combinations, in relapse or refractory disease.

ERCC1 and ERCC2 Polymorphisms Predict the Efficacy and Toxicity of Platinum-Based Chemotherapy in Small Cell Lung Cancer

Standard first-line chemotherapy in small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is based on the platinum plus etoposide combination. Despite a high objective response rate, responses are not durable and chemotherapy-induced toxicity may compromise treatment. Genetic variants in genes involved in the DNA-repair pathways and in etoposide metabolization could predict treatment efficacy and safety and help personalize platinum-based chemotherapy. Germline polymorphisms in XRCC1, ERCC1, ERCC2, ABCB1, ABCC3, UGT1A1 and GSTP1 genes were investigated in 145 patients with SCLC. The tumor expression of ERCC1 was determined using immunohistochemistry, and the tumor expression of ERCC1-XPF was determined via a proximity ligation assay. Survival analyses showed a statistically significant association between the ERCC1 rs11615 variant and median progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with limited-stage (LS) SCLC (multivariate: hazard ratio 3.25, [95% CI 1.38-7.70]; p = 0.007). Furthermore, we observed differences between the ERCC1-XPF complex and median PFS in LS-SCLC, although statistical significance was not reached (univariate: positive expression 10.8 [95% CI 4.09-17.55] months versus negative expression 13.3 [95% CI 7.32-19.31] months; p = 0.06). Safety analyses showed that the ERCC2 rs1799793 variant was significantly associated with the risk of grade ≥ 3 thrombocytopenia in the total cohort (multivariate: odds ratio 3.15, [95% CI 1.08-9.17]; p = 0.04). Our results provide evidence that ERCC1 and ERCC2 variants may predict the efficacy and safety of platinum-based chemotherapy in SCLC patients. LS-SCLC patients may benefit most from ERCC1 determination, but prospective studies are needed.

Small Cell Lung Cancer-An Update on Chemotherapy Resistance

OPINION STATEMENT

Compared to other types of lung cancer, small cell lung cancer (SCLC) exhibits aggressive characteristics that promote drug resistance. Despite platinum-etoposide chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy being the current standard treatment, the rapid development of drug resistance has led to unsatisfactory clinical outcomes. This review focuses on the mechanisms contributing to the chemotherapy resistance phenotype in SCLC, such as increased intra-tumoral heterogeneity, alterations in the tumor microenvironment, changes in cellular metabolism, and dysregulation of apoptotic pathways. A comprehensive understanding of these drug resistance mechanisms in SCLC is imperative for ushering in a new era in cancer research, which will promise revolutionary advancements in cancer diagnosis and treatment methodologies.

Second-line treatment outcomes after first-line chemotherapy plus immunotherapy in Extensive-Stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) patients: A large French multicenter study

INTRODUCTION

Chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy (CT-IO) is the standard treatment for patients with Extensive-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer (ES-SCLC). This study evaluates the effectiveness of second-line (2L) following CT-IO.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

All patients from 10 centers who received a 2L after a first-line CT-IO were included. They were divided into 3 groups: platinum-based, lurbinectedin or others (topotecan, CAV, taxanes). We assessed overall survival (OS) and 2L progression-free survival (2L-PFS) according to treatment and platinum free-interval (PFI) < or ≥ 90 days.

RESULTS

Among 82 patients included, median age was 67.0 years, 29.3 % had a Performans Status ≥ 2, 36.6 % had brain progression, 69.5 % were considered "platine-sensitive" and 30.5 % "platine-resistant" (PFI ≥ or < 90 days, respectively). As 2L, 37/82 patients (45.1 %) received platinum-doublet, 21/82 (25.6 %) lurbinectedin and 24/82 (29.3 %) others. Patients with a PFI ≥ 90 days received mainly platinum-based rechallenge (34/57, 59.6 %). With a median follow-up of 18.5 months, the median OS was 5.0 months (95 %CI, 1.5-7.9) / 6.8 months (95 %CI, 5.5-8.7) for platinum-resistant / sensitive, respectively (log rank p = 0.017). The median 2L-PFS was 1.9 months (95 %CI, 1.2-4.7) / 3.9 months (95 %CI, 2.9-6.0) for platinum-resistant / sensitive, respectively. Median OS was 8.1 (95 %CI, 6.3-12.9) / 4.9 (95 %CI, 3.7-6.8) / 5.1 months (95 %CI, 2.5-7.8) with platinum rechallenge / lurbinectedin / others, respectively (p = 0.017). Median 2L-PFS was 4.6 (95 %CI, 3.9-7.2) / 2.7 (95 %CI, 1.6-3.9) / 2.2 months (95 %CI, 1.5-4.1) with platinum rechallenge / lurbinectedin / others, respectively (p = 0.025).

DISCUSSION

Platinum-based rechallenge after a first-line CT-IO showed promising results despite particularly unfavorable characteristics within our real-word population. Lurbinectedin when used after IO demonstrated as low efficacy as other platinum-free regimens.

Phase II study of nab-paclitaxel with gemcitabine for relapsed/refractory small cell lung cancer

Background

Patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) often respond to first-line chemoimmunotherapy. However, relapse is inevitable and is associated with a poor prognosis. Treatments for relapsed SCLC, such as lurbinectedin and topotecan, are limited by modest efficacy and significant hematologic adverse events, leaving a need for newer therapeutic agents or regimens. The combination of gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel is active and safe in other types of malignancies, such as pancreatic cancer.

Patients and methods

We conducted a phase II trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel in patients with relapsed/refractory SCLC. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR), defined as the proportion of patients with confirmed complete or partial response. Secondary endpoints included time to progression (TTP), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety.

Results

Between October 2016 and May 2021, 32 patients were enrolled. Patients were followed for a median of 9.3 months (range 1.8-65.2). Median age was 65 years (range 48-81). Fifty percent of patients were female. Fifty-three percent of patients had platinum-resistant/refractory relapsed SCLC. The ORR was 28.1% (95% confidence interval [CI] 15.5-100%). Median PFS was 2.9 months (95% CI 2.4-3.6), and median OS was 9.3 months (95% CI 5.2-12.4). Seven patients (21.9%) developed grade 3 or 4 neutropenia.

Conclusion

Our study showed that the combination of gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel led to encouraging outcomes in relapsed/refractory SCLC. Further studies are needed to compare this combination with other treatments used for relapsed SCLC, including lurbinectedin, temozolomide, and topotecan.

Clinical trial registration

https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02769832?cond=NCT02769832&rank=1, identifier NCT02769832.

Camrelizumab combined with anlotinib as second-line therapy for metastatic or recurrent small cell lung cancer: a retrospective cohort study

Introduction

This retrospective study evaluates the efficacy of camrelizumab combined with anlotinib versus chemotherapy in patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) undergoing second-line treatment.

Methods

Data were sourced from medical records at a Chinese medical facility, involving 34 patients diagnosed with ES-SCLC after failing first-line treatment. Patients were divided into two groups: one received camrelizumab (200 mg every 3 weeks) with anlotinib (12 mg daily for 14 days followed by a 7-day rest), while the other group received physician-chosen chemotherapy administered every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), with secondary endpoints including overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and disease control rate (DCR).

Results

The combination therapy group showed a significant improvement in PFS compared to the chemotherapy group (median PFS: 7 months vs. 3 months; hazard ratio (HR): 0.34; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.15-0.77; p<0.001). However, there was no statistically significant difference in OS between the groups (16.3 months vs. 17.3 months; p=0.82). The ORR was 52.9% in the combination therapy group versus 23.5% in the chemotherapy group (p=0.08), and the DCR was 82.4% compared to 58.8% (p=0.26). Grade 3 or higher adverse events were observed in 17.6% of the combination therapy group and 29.4% of the chemotherapy group.

Conclusions

The findings suggest that the combination of camrelizumab and anlotinib offers a superior anti-tumor response with a manageable safety profile in a second-line setting for ES-SCLC patients. This combination regimen may be a viable option for second-line ES-SCLC treatment.

Real-world comparison of chemo-immunotherapy and chemotherapy alone in the treatment of extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer

INTRODUCTION

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a high-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma responsible for 200,000 deaths per year worldwide. Platinum-etoposide-based chemotherapy has been the standard of treatment for the past 40 years, with an overall survival of 10 months. Since 2019, the addition of immunotherapy (atezolizumab or durvalumab) to chemotherapy has become the standard of care for first-line treatment of extensive-stage SCLC following the demonstration of an improvement in overall survival in phase 3 studies. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of chemo-immunotherapy compared with chemotherapy alone in a "real-world" setting.

METHODS

Retrospective observational study including patients undergoing first-line treatment for extensive-stage SCLC between 2014 and 2022. We separated the study population into two arms (chemo-immunotherapy/chemotherapy). For each arm, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and serious side effects were collected. Associations between treatments and survival outcomes were adjusted for potential confounders. Consolidative palliative thoracic radiotherapy was introduced in the models as a time-dependent variable.

RESULTS

A total of 118 patients with a median age of 63 years were included. 65.2 % of patients were performance status 0 or 1. In univariate analysis, PFS and OS were not significantly different between the chemo-immunotherapy and chemotherapy alone groups (p = 0.70 and 0.24 respectively). In multivariate analysis, the addition of immunotherapy to chemotherapy was not significantly associated with better PFS (HR 0.76, IC (0.49 - 1.19), p = 0.23), but it was significantly associated with better OS (HR 0.61, IC (0.38 - 0.98), p = 0.04). Consolidative palliative thoracic radiotherapy (time-dependent variable), when applied (almost only in the chemotherapy alone group), was significantly associated with better PFS and OS.

DISCUSSION

In this real-world study, chemo-immunotherapy was associated with slightly better OS compared to chemotherapy alone as a first-line treatment in ES-SCLC patients in multivariate analysis, which is not explained by a benefit in PFS. However, consolidative palliative thoracic radiotherapy seems to be significantly associated with better OS and PFS, suggesting that we should also consider using it in patients receiving chemo-immunotherapy.

Lurbinectedin in small cell lung cancer: real-world experience of a multicentre national early access programme

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Lurbinectedin is a novel oncogenic transcription inhibitor active in several cancers, including small cell lung cancer (SCLC). We aimed to describe the first Australian experience of the clinical efficacy and tolerability of lurbinectedin for the treatment of SCLC after progression on platinum-containing therapy.

METHODS

Multicentre real-world study of individuals with SCLC initiating lurbinectedin monotherapy (3.2 mg/m2 three-weekly) on an early access programme between May 2020 and December 2021. Key outcomes were clinical utilisation, efficacy and tolerability. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Outcome data were collected within the AUstralian Registry and biObank of thoRacic cAncers (AURORA).

RESULTS

Data were analysed for 46 individuals across seven sites. Lurbinectedin was given as second- (83%, 38/46) or subsequent- (17%, 8/46) line therapy, mostly with prior chemoimmunotherapy (87%, 40/46). We report dose modifications (17%, 8/46), interruptions/delays (24%, 11/46), high-grade toxicities (28%, 13/46) and hospitalisations (54%, 25/46) during active treatment. The overall response rate was 33% and the disease control rate was 50%. Six-month OS was 44% (95% confidence interval (CI): 29.0-57.1). Twelve-month OS was 15% (95% CI: 6.5-26.8). From lurbinectedin first dose, the median PFS was 2.5 months (95% CI: 1.8-2.9) and OS was 4.5 months (95% CI: 3.5-7.2). From SCLC diagnosis, the median OS was 12.9 months (95% CI: 11.0-17.2). Individuals with a longer chemotherapy-free interval prior to lurbinectedin had longer PFS and OS.

CONCLUSION

This real-world national experience of lurbinectedin post-platinum chemotherapy and immunotherapy for individuals with SCLC was similar to that reported in clinical trials.

RESILIENT Part 2: A Randomized, Open-Label Phase III Study of Liposomal Irinotecan Versus Topotecan in Adults With Relapsed Small Cell Lung Cancer

PURPOSE

The phase III RESILIENT trial compared second-line liposomal irinotecan with topotecan in patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with SCLC and progression on or after first-line platinum-based chemotherapy were randomly assigned (1:1) to intravenous (IV) liposomal irinotecan (70 mg/m2 every 2 weeks in a 6-week cycle) or IV topotecan (1.5 mg/m2 daily for 5 consecutive days, every 3 weeks in a 6-week cycle). The primary end point was overall survival (OS). Key secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rate (ORR).

RESULTS

Among 461 randomly assigned patients, 229 received liposomal irinotecan and 232 received topotecan. The median follow-up was 18.4 months. The median OS was 7.9 months with liposomal irinotecan versus 8.3 months with topotecan (hazard ratio [HR], 1.11 [95% CI, 0.90 to 1.37]; P = .31). The median PFS per blinded independent central review (BICR) was 4.0 months with liposomal irinotecan and 3.3 months with topotecan (HR, 0.96 [95% CI, 0.77 to 1.20]; nominal P = .71); ORR per BICR was 44.1% (95% CI, 37.6 to 50.8) and 21.6% (16.4 to 27.4), respectively. Overall, 42.0% and 83.4% of patients receiving liposomal irinotecan and topotecan, respectively, experienced grade ≥3 related treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). The most common grade ≥3 related TEAEs were diarrhea (13.7%), neutropenia (8.0%), and decreased neutrophil count (4.4%) with liposomal irinotecan and neutropenia (51.6%), anemia (30.9%), and leukopenia (29.1%) with topotecan.

CONCLUSION

Liposomal irinotecan and topotecan demonstrated similar median OS and PFS in patients with relapsed SCLC. Although the primary end point of OS was not met, liposomal irinotecan demonstrated a higher ORR than topotecan. The safety profile of liposomal irinotecan was consistent with its known safety profile; no new safety concerns emerged.

Teriflunomide/leflunomide synergize with chemotherapeutics by decreasing mitochondrial fragmentation via DRP1 in SCLC

Although up to 80% small cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients' response is good for first-line chemotherapy regimen, most patients develop recurrence of the disease within weeks to months. Here, we report cytostatic effect of leflunomide (Leflu) and teriflunomide (Teri) on SCLC cell proliferation through inhibition of DRP1 phosphorylation at Ser616 and decreased mitochondrial fragmentation. When administered together, Teri and carboplatin (Carbo) act synergistically to significantly inhibit cell proliferation and DRP1 phosphorylation, reduce abundance of intermediates in pyrimidine de novo pathway, and increase apoptosis and DNA damage. Combination of Leflu&Carbo has anti-tumorigenic effect in vivo. Additionally, lurbinectedin (Lur) and Teri potently and synergistically inhibited spheroid growth and depleted uridine and DRP1 phosphorylation in mouse tumors. Our results suggest combinations of Carbo and Lur with Teri or Leflu are efficacious and underscore how the relationship between DRP1/DHODH and mitochondrial plasticity serves as a potential therapeutic target to validate these treatment strategies in SCLC clinical trials.

Durable Objective Response to Lurbinectedin in Small Cell Bladder Cancer with TP53 Mutation: A Molecular-Directed Strategy

Small cell bladder cancer (SCBC) is a rare and aggressive disease, often treated with platinum/etoposide-based chemotherapy. Key molecular drivers include the inactivation of onco-suppressor genes (TP53, RB1) and amplifications in proto-oncogenes (MYC). We report a patient with SCBC who achieved an objective and prolonged response to lurbinectedin, which has been approved for metastatic small cell lung cancer, after developing disease progression on cisplatin/etoposide and nivolumab/ipilimumab. A genomic analysis of a metastatic biopsy prior to lurbinectedin initiation revealed a TP53 mutation and amplification of the cell cycle regulators E2F3 and MYCL. A repeat biopsy following the development of lurbinectedin resistance showed a new actionable ERBB2 alteration without significant change in the tumor mutation burden (six mutations/Mb). The present report suggests that lurbinectedin may be active and should be further explored in SCBC harboring TP53 mutations and amplifications in E2F3 and MYC family complexes.

Cardiovascular comorbidities and their prognostic value in small cell lung cancer patients with chemoradiotherapy

BACKGROUND

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is an extremely malignant subtype of lung cancer because of its high potential for metastases. Cardiac invasion of SCLC is a serious concern that may lead to systemic embolism or tract obstruction. It has aroused much concern that cardiovascular comorbidities may significantly affect the survival of SCLC patients and their treatment decisions.

METHODS

We consecutively recruited 772 small cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients between January 2011 and December 2018 from 4 cancer specialty hospitals in China. Only newly diagnosed primary cancer inpatients were included. Univariable and multivariable adjusted Cox proportional hazard models were conducted to evaluate the risk factors associated with mortality. Hazard ratios (HRs) for mortality and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated.

RESULTS

The prevalence of cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) was 34.6% in all SCLC patients. Log-rank analysis presented statistically significant differences in median survival time (MST) between patients with CVD and without CVD in all SCLC patients (9.0 months vs. 15.0 months, P = 0.005) and patients with chemotherapy only (12.0 months vs. 18.0 months, P = 0.048). Pericardial effusion (HR 1.671, 95% CI 1.082-2.580, P = 0.021) and heart failure (HR 1.752, 95% CI 1.290-2.379, P < 0.001) were independent risk factors associated with mortality in all SCLC patients. VTE is related to poorer prognosis in patients with chemotherapy only (HR 5.558, 95% CI 1.335-23.135, P = 0.018) and chemoradiotherapy (HR 3.057, 95% CI 1.270-7.539, P = 0.013).

CONCLUSIONS

Comprehensive management of CVD comorbidities is of vital importance for the long-term prognosis of SCLC patients.

Potential therapeutic targets in myeloid cell therapy for overcoming chemoresistance and immune suppression in gastrointestinal tumors

In the tumor microenvironment (TME), myeloid cells play a pivotal role. Myeloid-derived immunosuppressive cells, including tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) and myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs), are central components in shaping the immunosuppressive milieu of the tumor. Within the TME, a majority of TAMs assume an M2 phenotype, characterized by their pro-tumoral activity. These cells promote tumor cell growth, angiogenesis, invasion, and migration. In contrast, M1 macrophages, under appropriate activation conditions, exhibit cytotoxic capabilities against cancer cells. However, an excessive M1 response may lead to pro-tumoral inflammation. As a result, myeloid cells have emerged as crucial targets in cancer therapy. This review concentrates on gastrointestinal tumors, detailing methods for targeting macrophages to enhance tumor radiotherapy and immunotherapy sensitivity. We specifically delve into monocytes and tumor-associated macrophages' various functions, establishing an immunosuppressive microenvironment, promoting tumorigenic inflammation, and fostering neovascularization and stromal remodeling. Additionally, we examine combination therapeutic strategies.

Big Decisions on Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Focus on Clinical Care Updates and Patient Perspectives

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is an uncommon, aggressive high-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma, associated with tobacco use. It is a highly chemosensitive disease that initially responds quickly to systemic therapy, although patients with SCLC tend to develop relapse. Although the landscape of SCLC treatment has remained stagnant for many decades, the field has seen notable advances in the past few years, including the use of immunotherapy, the development of further lines of systemic therapy, the refinement of thoracic and intracranial radiotherapy, and-most recently-the promise of more targeted therapies. Patients with SCLC also must face unique psychosocial burdens in their experience with their cancer, distinct from patients with other lung cancer. In this article, we review the latest literature and future directions in the management and investigation of SCLC, as well as the critical decisions that providers and patients must navigate in the current landscape. We also present the perspectives of several patients with SCLC in conjunction with this summary, to spotlight their individual journeys in the context of this challenging disease.

Delta-like ligand 3: A promising target against small cell lung cancer

This commentary highlighted the current knowledge about novel DLL3-targeting agents for refractory small cell lung cancer.

Follistatin-like 1 protects against doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity by preventing mitochondrial dysfunction through the SIRT6/Nrf2 signaling pathway

Mitochondrial dysfunction and myocardial remodeling have been reported to be the main underlying molecular mechanisms of doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity. SIRT6 is a nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide-dependent enzyme that plays a vital role in cardiac protection against various stresses. Moreover, previous studies have demonstrated that FSTL1 could alleviate doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity by inhibiting autophagy. The present study investigated the probable mechanisms of FSTL1 on doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity in vivo and in vitro. We confirmed that FSTL1 exerted a pivotal protective role on cardiac tissue in vivo and on doxorubicin-induced cell injury in vitro. Furthermore, FSTL1 can alleviate doxorubicin-induced mitochondrial dysfunction by inhibiting autophagy and apoptosis. Further studies demonstrated that FSTL1 can activate SIRT6 signaling by restoring the SIRT6 protein expression in doxorubicin-induced myocardial injury. SIRT6 activation elevated the protein expression of Nrf2 in doxorubicin-induced H9C2 injury. Treatment with the Nrf2 inhibitor ML385 partially antagonized the cardioprotective role of SIRT6 on doxorubicin-induced autophagy or apoptosis. These results suggested that the protective mechanism of FSTL1 on doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity may be related with the inhibition of autophagy and apoptosis, partly through the activation of SIRT6/Nrf2.

The Evolving Scenario of ES-SCLC Management: From Biology to New Cancer Therapeutics

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is an aggressive neuroendocrine carcinoma accounting for 15% of lung cancers with dismal survival outcomes. Minimal changes in therapy and prognosis have occurred in SCLC for the past four decades. Recent progress in the treatment of extensive-stage disease (ES-SCLC) has been marked by incorporating immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) into platinum-based chemotherapy, leading to modest improvements. Moreover, few second-line-and-beyond treatment options are currently available. The main limitation for the molecular study of SCLC has been the scarcity of samples, because only very early diseases are treated with surgery and biopsies are not performed when the disease progresses. Despite all these difficulties, in recent years we have come to understand that SCLC is not a homogeneous disease. At the molecular level, in addition to the universal loss of retinoblastoma (RB) and TP53 genes, a recent large molecular study has identified other mutations that could serve as targets for therapy development or patient selection. In recent years, there has also been the identification of new genetic subtypes which have shown us how intertumor heterogeneity exists. Moreover, SCLC can also develop intratumoral heterogeneity linked mainly to the concept of cellular plasticity, mostly due to the development of resistance to therapies. The aim of this review is to quickly present the current standard of care of ES-SCLC, to focus on the molecular landscapes and subtypes of SCLC, subsequently present the most promising therapeutic strategies under investigation, and finally recap the future directions of ongoing clinical trials for this aggressive disease which still remains a challenge.

Challenges and opportunities in the immunotherapy era: balancing expectations with hope in small-cell lung cancer

Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a biologically aggressive subtype of lung cancer, a lethal disease characterized by rapid tumor growth, early relapse, a strong tendency for early widespread metastasis, and high genomic instability, making it a formidable foe in modern oncology practice. While the management of non-SCLC has been revolutionized in the era of immunotherapy, progress in SCLC has been more muted. Recent randomized phase III clinical trials have combined programmed death ligand-1 inhibitors to a chemotherapy backbone and demonstrated improved survival; however, the absolute benefit observed is short months. There is an undeniable urgent need for better responses, better agents, novel therapeutic approaches, and more rational, biomarker-driven clinical trials in SCLC. In this review, we discuss the rationale and current understanding of the biology of SCLC in the modern era of immunotherapy, discuss recent advances in front-line immunotherapeutic approaches that have changed clinical practice globally, provide an overview of some of the challenges and limitations that have staggered immune checkpoint blockade in SCLC, and explore some of the novel immunotherapeutic approaches currently being investigated.

Preclinical Evaluation of JAB-2485, a Potent AURKA Inhibitor with High Selectivity and Favorable Pharmacokinetic Properties

As a critical mitotic regulator, Aurora kinase A (AURKA) is aberrantly activated in a wide range of cancers. Therapeutic targeting of AUKRA is a promising strategy for the treatment of solid tumors. In this study, we evaluated the preclinical characteristics of JAB-2485, a small-molecule inhibitor of AURKA currently in Phase I/IIa clinical trial in the US (NCT05490472). Biochemical studies demonstrated that JAB-2485 is potent and highly selective on AURKA, with subnanomolar IC50 and around 1500-fold selectivity over AURKB or AURKC. In addition, JAB-2485 exhibited favorable pharmacokinetic properties featured by low clearance and good bioavailability, strong dose-response relationship, as well as low risk for hematotoxicity and off-target liability. As a single agent, JAB-2485 effectively induced G2/M cell cycle arrest and apoptosis and inhibited the proliferation of small cell lung cancer, triple-negative breast cancer, and neuroblastoma cells. Furthermore, JAB-2485 exhibited robust in vivo antitumor activity both as monotherapy and in combination with chemotherapies or the bromodomain inhibitor JAB-8263 in xenograft models of various cancer types. Together, these encouraging preclinical data provide a strong basis for safety and efficacy evaluations of JAB-2485 in the clinical setting.

Acquired Cross-Resistance in Small Cell Lung Cancer due to Extrachromosomal DNA Amplification of MYC Paralogs

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) presents as a highly chemosensitive malignancy but acquires cross-resistance after relapse. This transformation is nearly inevitable in patients but has been difficult to capture in laboratory models. Here, we present a preclinical system that recapitulates acquired cross-resistance, developed from 51 patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models. Each model was tested in vivo against three clinical regimens: cisplatin plus etoposide, olaparib plus temozolomide, and topotecan. These drug-response profiles captured hallmark clinical features of SCLC, such as the emergence of treatment-refractory disease after early relapse. For one patient, serial PDX models revealed that cross-resistance was acquired through MYC amplification on extrachromosomal DNA (ecDNA). Genomic and transcriptional profiles of the full PDX panel revealed that MYC paralog amplifications on ecDNAs were recurrent in relapsed cross-resistant SCLC, and this was corroborated in tumor biopsies from relapsed patients. We conclude that ecDNAs with MYC paralogs are recurrent drivers of cross-resistance in SCLC.

SIGNIFICANCE

SCLC is initially chemosensitive, but acquired cross-resistance renders this disease refractory to further treatment and ultimately fatal. The genomic drivers of this transformation are unknown. We use a population of PDX models to discover that amplifications of MYC paralogs on ecDNA are recurrent drivers of acquired cross-resistance in SCLC. This article is featured in Selected Articles from This Issue, p. 695.

Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Lurbinectedin Administrated with Itraconazole in Cancer Patients: A Drug-Drug Interaction Study

This open-label, two-part, phase Ib drug-drug interaction study investigated whether the pharmacokinetic (PK) and safety profiles of lurbinectedin (LRB), a marine-derived drug, are affected by co-administration of itraconazole (ITZ), a strong CYP3A4 inhibitor, in adult patients with advanced solid tumors. In Part A, three patients were sequentially assigned to Sequence 1 (LRB 0.8 mg/m2, 1-h intravenous [IV] + ITZ 200 mg/day oral in Cycle 1 [C1] and LRB alone 3.2 mg/m2, 1 h, IV in Cycle 2 [C2]). In Part B, 11 patients were randomized (1:1) to receive either Sequence 1 (LRB at 0.9 mg/m2 + ITZ in C1 and LRB alone in C2) or Sequence 2 (LRB alone in C1 and LRB + ITZ in C2). Eleven patients were evaluable for PK analysis: three in Part A and eight in Part B (four per sequence). The systemic total exposure of LRB increased with ITZ co-administration: 15% for Cmax, area under the curve (AUC) 2.4-fold for AUC0-t and 2.7-fold for AUC0-∞. Co-administration with ITZ produced statistically significant modifications in the unbound plasma LRB PK parameters. The LRB safety profile was consistent with the toxicities described in previous studies. Co-administration with multiple doses of ITZ significantly altered LRB systemic exposure. Hence, to avoid LRB overexposure when co-administered with strong CYP3A4 inhibitors, an LRB dose reduction proportional to CL reduction should be applied.

Sintilimab plus anlotinib as second or further-line therapy for extensive disease small cell lung cancer: a phase 2 investigator-initiated non-randomized controlled trial

Background

Treatment options remain rather limited for extensive disease small cell lung cancer (ED-SCLC) patients in second or further-line setting.

Methods

The phase 2 investigator-initiated non-randomized study enrolled patients who had disease progression on at least one line of platinum-based chemotherapy. Participants received intravenous sintilimab 200 mg on day one and oral daily anlotinib 12 mg on days 1-14 once every three weeks per cycle. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). The secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR) and safety. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04055792).

Findings

Forty-two patients were enrolled between August 29, 2019 and December 26, 2021 at Henan Cancer Hospital in China. 37 patients were evaluable for efficacy. The median follow-up was 24.8 months (IQR: 16.9-28.2). The median PFS was 6.1 months (95% CI: 5.0-7.3). The OS was 12.7 months (95% CI: 7.1-18.2). The ORR was 56.8% (21/37, 95% CI: 40.0-73.5) and the DCR was 89.2% (33/37, 95% CI: 78.7-99.7). Forty patients (40/42, 95%) had at least one treatment-related adverse event (TRAE). Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) were reported in 39 patients (39/42, 93%), while grade 3 or higher irAEs occurred in 11 patients (11/42, 26%). The most frequent irAEs were hypothyroidism (16/42, 38%), elevated gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (15/42, 36%) and elevated creatine kinase MB (15/42, 36%). The most frequent grade 3 or higher irAEs were elevated gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (5/42, 12%) and increased aspartate aminotransferase (3/42, 7%).

Interpretation

Sintilimab plus anlotinib demonstrated promising antitumor activities as second or further-line therapy for ED-SCLC and had manageable toxicities. The findings support further randomized controlled trials of this combination regimen for ED-SCLC.

Funding

Henan Province Health and Youth Subject Leader Training Project, Henan Health Science and Technology Innovation Talents, ZHONGYUAN QIANREN JIHUA, Henan International Joint Laboratory of drug resistance and reversal of targeted therapy for lung cancer, Tumor Research Fund of Anti-Angiogenesis Targeted Therapy of China Anti-Cancer Association.

A review on marine source as anticancer agents

This review investigates the potential of natural compounds obtained from marine sources for the treatment of cancer. The oceans are believed to contain physiologically active compounds, such as alkaloids, nucleosides, macrolides, and polyketides, which have shown promising effects in slowing human tumor cells both in vivo and in vitro. Various marine species, including algae, mollusks, actinomycetes, fungi, sponges, and soft corals, have been studied for their bioactive metabolites with diverse chemical structures. The review explores the therapeutic potential of various marine-derived substances and discusses their possible applications in cancer treatment.

Immunogenic cell stress and death in the treatment of cancer

The successful treatment of oncological malignancies which results in long-term disease control or the complete eradication of cancerous cells necessitates the onset of adaptive immune responses targeting tumor-specific antigens. Such desirable anticancer immunity can be triggered via the induction of immunogenic cell death (ICD) of cancer cells, thus converting malignant cells into an in situ vaccine that elicits T cell mediated adaptive immune responses and establishes durable immunological memory. The exploration of ICD for cancer treatment has been subject to extensive research. However, functional heterogeneity among ICD activating therapies in many cases requires specific co-medications to achieve full-blown efficacy. Here, we described the hallmarks of ICD and classify ICD activators into three distinct functional categories namely, according to their mode of action: (i) ICD inducers, which increase the immunogenicity of malignant cells, (ii) ICD sensitizers, which prime cellular circuitries for ICD induction by conventional cytotoxic agents, and (iii) ICD enhancers, which improve the perception of ICD signals by antigen presenting dendritic cells. Altogether, ICD induction, sensitization and enhancement offer the possibility to convert well-established conventional anticancer therapies into immunotherapeutic approaches that activate T cell-mediated anticancer immunity.

Recent advances and future strategies in first-line treatment of ES-SCLC

Recent advancements in treating extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) have been significantly marked by incorporating immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) into platinum-based chemotherapy, leading to modest yet notable improvements in patient outcomes, which become more evident with longer follow-up. However, critical challenges persist, such as identifying effective biomarkers for accurate patient selection or finding more effective drugs. This review delves into the current and evolving treatment landscape for ES-SCLC, focusing on the most promising therapeutic strategies under investigation. We discuss the latest developments in the use of newer ICIs, antiangiogenic agents, PARP inhibitors (PARPi), lurbinectedin, and anti-DLL3 agents, offering insights into potential future directions in the management of this aggressive cancer.

Considerations for selecting second-line treatment in patients with progressive small cell lung cancer and the use of Lurbinectedin in this setting

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is characterized by high initial responses to platinum-based chemotherapy plus immune checkpoint inhibitors; however, most patients quickly relapse and require subsequent treatment. Second-line treatment options in SCLC remain limited, and treatment algorithms are not completely consistent across the available guidelines in this setting. This review highlights key considerations regarding selection of second-line treatment for patients with relapsed SCLC. In particular, the role of lurbinectedin, which was first approved in 2020, representing the first significant addition to treatment algorithms in this setting for decades, is summarized. Future directions, including the identification of SCLC subtypes and the need for predictive biomarkers to guide patient selection and targeted therapy, are also discussed.

Small cells - big issues: biological implications and preclinical advancements in small cell lung cancer

Current treatment guidelines refer to small cell lung cancer (SCLC), one of the deadliest human malignancies, as a homogeneous disease. Accordingly, SCLC therapy comprises chemoradiation with or without immunotherapy. Meanwhile, recent studies have made significant advances in subclassifying SCLC based on the elevated expression of the transcription factors ASCL1, NEUROD1, and POU2F3, as well as on certain inflammatory characteristics. The role of the transcription regulator YAP1 in defining a unique SCLC subset remains to be established. Although preclinical analyses have described numerous subtype-specific characteristics and vulnerabilities, the so far non-existing clinical subtype distinction may be a contributor to negative clinical trial outcomes. This comprehensive review aims to provide a framework for the development of novel personalized therapeutic approaches by compiling the most recent discoveries achieved by preclinical SCLC research. We highlight the challenges faced due to limited access to patient material as well as the advances accomplished by implementing state-of-the-art models and methodologies.

A pivotal bridging study of lurbinectedin as second-line therapy in Chinese patients with small cell lung cancer

This single-arm, multi-center clinical trial aimed to evaluate the safety, tolerability, DLT, recommended dose (RD), preliminary efficacy, and pharmacokinetics (PK) characteristics of lurbinectedin, a selective inhibitor of oncogenic transcription, in Chinese patients with advanced solid tumors, including relapsed SCLC. Patients with advanced solid tumors were recruited in the dose-escalation stage and received lurbinectedin in a 3 + 3 design (two cohorts: 2.5 mg/m2 and 3.2 mg/m2, IV, q3wk). The RD was expanded in the following dose-expansion stage, including relapsed SCLC patients after first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. The primary endpoints included safety profile, tolerability, DLT, RD, and preliminary efficacy profile, while the secondary endpoints included PK characteristics. In the dose-escalation stage, ten patients were included, while one patient had DLT in the 3.2 mg/m2 cohort, which was also the RD for the dose-expansion stage. At cutoff (May 31, 2022), 22 SCLC patients were treated in the ongoing dose-expansion stage, and the median follow-up was 8.1 months (range 3.0-11.7). The most common grade ≥ 3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) included neutropenia (77.3%), leukopenia (63.6%), thrombocytopenia (40.9%), anemia (18.2%), and ALT increased (18.2%). The most common severe adverse events (SAEs) included neutropenia (27.3%), leukopenia (22.7%), thrombocytopenia (18.2%), and vomiting (9.1%). No treatment-related deaths occurred. The Independent Review Committee (IRC)-assessed ORR was 45.5% (95% CI 26.9-65.3). Lurbinectedin at the RD (3.2 mg/m2) showed manageable safety and acceptable tolerability in Chinese patients with advanced solid tumors, and demonstrates promising efficacy in Chinese patients with SCLC as second-line therapy.Trial registration: This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04638491, 20/11/2020.

β-Carboline alkaloids from the roots of Peganum harmala L

This study reports the isolation of four new β-carboline alkaloids (1-4) and six previously identified alkaloids (5-10) from the roots of Peganum harmala L. Among these compounds, 1 and 2 were characterized as rare β-carboline-quinazoline dimers exhibiting axial chirality. Compound 3 possessed a unique 6/5/6/7 tetracyclic ring system with an azepine ring, and compound 4 was a novel annomontine β-carboline. The structures of these compounds were elucidated by spectroscopic data and quantum mechanical calculations. The biosynthetic pathways of 1-3 were proposed. Additionally, the cytotoxicity of some isolates against four cancer cell lines (HL-60, A549, MDA-MB-231, and DU145) was evaluated. Notably, compound 4 exhibited significant cytotoxicity against HL-60, A549, and DU145 cells with IC50 values of 12.39, 12.80, and 30.65 μmol·L-1, respectively. Furthermore, compound 2 demonstrated selective cytotoxicity against HL-60 cells with an IC50 value of 17.32 μmol·L-1.