1
|
Lan YL, Zou S, Chen R. Update on the intriguing roles of AQP4 expression and redistribution in the progression and treatment of glioma. Ann Med 2024; 56:2401111. [PMID: 39247976 PMCID: PMC11385637 DOI: 10.1080/07853890.2024.2401111] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2023] [Revised: 04/26/2024] [Accepted: 05/02/2024] [Indexed: 09/10/2024] Open
Abstract
Aquaporin 4 (AQP4) is abundant in the human brain and has an important role in brain homeostasis and diseases. AQP4 expression has been found to be associated with glioma malignancies. However, the complete understanding of the biological processes and curative importance of AQP4 in glioma remains unclear. The impact of AQP4 subcellular mislocalization on glioma progression and the precise mechanisms regarding AQP4 translocation in glioma need further investigation. In this review, we update recent findings about disturbed AQP4 expression in glioma and explore targeting AQP4 to modulate the glioma progression. Thereafter we discuss some possible mechanisms of action of AQP4 translocations in glioma. The present article offers an appropriate introduction to the potential involvement of AQP4 in the emergence and progression of glioma. Both comprehensive research into the mechanisms and systematically intervention studies focusing on AQP4 are essential. By embracing this strategy, we can obtain a new and insightful outlook on managing cancerous glioma. Although the observations summarized in this review should be confirmed with more studies, we believe that they could provide critical information for the design of more focused research that will allow for systematic and definitive evaluation of the role of AQP4 in glioma treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu-Long Lan
- Department of Neurosurgery, Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Key Laboratory of Precise Treatment and Clinical Translational Research of Neurological Diseases, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Shuang Zou
- Key Laboratory of Neuropharmacology and Translational Medicine, School of Pharmaceutical Science, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Ruoli Chen
- School of Pharmacy and Bioengineering, Keele University, Staffordshire, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Steindl A, Valiente M. Potential of ex vivo organotypic slice cultures in neuro-oncology. Neuro Oncol 2024:noae195. [PMID: 39504579 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noae195] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2024] Open
Abstract
Over recent decades, in vitro and in vivo models have significantly advanced brain cancer research; however, each presents distinct challenges for accurately mimicking in situ conditions. In response, organotypic slice cultures have emerged as a promising model recapitulating precisely specific in vivo phenotypes through an ex vivo approach. Ex vivo organotypic brain slice models can integrate biological relevance and patient-specific variability early in drug discovery, thereby aiming for more precise treatment stratification. However, the challenges of obtaining representative fresh brain tissue, ensuring reproducibility, and maintaining essential central nervous system (CNS)-specific conditions reflecting the in situ situation over time have limited the direct application of ex vivo organotypic slice cultures in robust clinical trials. In this review, we explore the benefits and possible limitations of ex vivo organotypic brain slice cultures in neuro-oncological research. Additionally, we share insights from clinical experts in neuro-oncology on how to overcome these current limitations and improve the practical application of organotypic brain slice cultures beyond academic research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ariane Steindl
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Brain Metastasis Group, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO), Madrid, Spain
| | - Manuel Valiente
- Brain Metastasis Group, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO), Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Mu Y, Zhang Z, Zhou H, Jin M, Ma L, Liu B, Ma C, Hu X, Zhang Y, Wang DA. A biomimetic targeted nanosystem delivering synergistic inhibitors for glioblastoma immune microenvironment reprogramming and treatment. Mater Today Bio 2024; 28:101222. [PMID: 39296357 PMCID: PMC11407969 DOI: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2024.101222] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2024] [Revised: 08/29/2024] [Accepted: 08/31/2024] [Indexed: 09/21/2024] Open
Abstract
Efficient drug delivery across the blood-brain barrier is imperative for treating glioblastoma (GBM). This study utilized the GBM cell membrane to construct a biomimetic targeted nanosystem (GMNPs@AMD/RAPA) that hierarchically releases the CXCR4 antagonist AMD3100 and the mTOR pathway inhibitor rapamycin (RAPA) for reprogramming the tumor immune microenvironment and suppressing the progression of GBM. By initially inhibiting the CXCL12/CXCR4 axis, the tumor microenvironment (TME) was reprogrammed to enhance the infiltration of cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) into the TME while suppressing tumor cell survival, proliferation, and angiogenesis. Subsequently, through further cellular uptake and degradation of the nanoparticles, the mTOR pathway inhibitor RAPA was released, further suppressing the tumor progression. This study successfully combined chemotherapy and immunotherapy, achieving effective synergistic therapeutic effects, and suppressing the progression of GBM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yulei Mu
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, City University of Hong Kong, 83 Tat Chee Avenue, Kowloon, Hong Kong
| | - Zhen Zhang
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, City University of Hong Kong, 83 Tat Chee Avenue, Kowloon, Hong Kong
| | - Huiqun Zhou
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, City University of Hong Kong, 83 Tat Chee Avenue, Kowloon, Hong Kong
- Karolinska Institutet Ming Wai Lau Centre for Reparative Medicine, HKSTP, Sha Tin, Hong Kong
| | - Min Jin
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, City University of Hong Kong, 83 Tat Chee Avenue, Kowloon, Hong Kong
- Karolinska Institutet Ming Wai Lau Centre for Reparative Medicine, HKSTP, Sha Tin, Hong Kong
| | - Liang Ma
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, City University of Hong Kong, 83 Tat Chee Avenue, Kowloon, Hong Kong
| | - Bangheng Liu
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, City University of Hong Kong, 83 Tat Chee Avenue, Kowloon, Hong Kong
- Karolinska Institutet Ming Wai Lau Centre for Reparative Medicine, HKSTP, Sha Tin, Hong Kong
| | - Cheng Ma
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, City University of Hong Kong, 83 Tat Chee Avenue, Kowloon, Hong Kong
- Karolinska Institutet Ming Wai Lau Centre for Reparative Medicine, HKSTP, Sha Tin, Hong Kong
| | - Xu Hu
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, City University of Hong Kong, 83 Tat Chee Avenue, Kowloon, Hong Kong
| | - Yi Zhang
- School of Integrated Circuit Science and Engineering, University of Electronic Science and Engineering of China, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Dong-An Wang
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, City University of Hong Kong, 83 Tat Chee Avenue, Kowloon, Hong Kong
- Karolinska Institutet Ming Wai Lau Centre for Reparative Medicine, HKSTP, Sha Tin, Hong Kong
- Shenzhen Research Institute, City University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hotchkiss KM, Karschnia P, Schreck KC, Geurts M, Cloughesy TF, Huse J, Duke ES, Lathia J, Ashley DM, Nduom EK, Long G, Singh K, Chalmers A, Ahluwalia MS, Heimberger A, Bagley S, Todo T, Verhaak R, Kelly PD, Hervey-Jumper S, de Groot J, Patel A, Fecci P, Parney I, Wykes V, Watts C, Burns TC, Sanai N, Preusser M, Tonn JC, Drummond KJ, Platten M, Das S, Tanner K, Vogelbaum MA, Weller M, Whittle JR, Berger MS, Khasraw M. A brave new framework for glioma drug development. Lancet Oncol 2024; 25:e512-e519. [PMID: 39362262 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(24)00190-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2024] [Revised: 03/26/2024] [Accepted: 03/28/2024] [Indexed: 10/05/2024]
Abstract
Patients with brain tumours are motivated to participate in clinical trials involving repeat tissue sampling. Normalising the use of neoadjuvant and staged surgical trials necessitates collaboration among patients, regulatory agencies, and researchers. Initial and repetitive tissue sampling plays a crucial role in enhancing our understanding of resistance mechanisms and vulnerabilities in brain tumour therapy. Standardising biopsy techniques and ensuring technical uniformity across institutions are vital for effective interinstitutional collaboration. Although liquid biopsy technologies hold promise, they are not yet ready to replace tissue analysis. Clear communication about the risks and benefits of biopsies is essential, particularly regarding potential postoperative deficits. Changes in mindset and neurosurgical culture are imperative to achieve much needed breakthroughs in the development of new, effective therapies for brain tumours.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelly M Hotchkiss
- The Preston Robert Tisch Brain Tumor Center at Duke, Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Philipp Karschnia
- Department of Neurosurgery, Friedrich-Alexander University, Erlangen, Germany; Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Karisa C Schreck
- Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Marjolein Geurts
- Department of Neurology, Erasmus MC Cancer Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands; Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | | | - Jason Huse
- Department of Pathology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA; Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Elizabeth S Duke
- Division of Oncology 2, Office of Oncologic Diseases, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA
| | - Justin Lathia
- Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA; Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA; Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - David M Ashley
- The Preston Robert Tisch Brain Tumor Center at Duke, Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Edjah K Nduom
- Department of Neurosurgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Georgina Long
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Mater and Royal North Shore Hospitals, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Kirit Singh
- The Preston Robert Tisch Brain Tumor Center at Duke, Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | | | | | - Amy Heimberger
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Stephen Bagley
- University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Tomoki Todo
- Department of Surgical Neuro-Oncology, The Institute of Medical Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Roel Verhaak
- Department of Surgical Neuro-Oncology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Patrick D Kelly
- Department of Neurosurgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Shawn Hervey-Jumper
- Department of Neurological Surgery, UCSF Brain Tumor Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA; Weill Institute for Neuroscience, Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - John de Groot
- Department of Neurological Surgery, UCSF Brain Tumor Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA; Weill Institute for Neuroscience, Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Anoop Patel
- The Preston Robert Tisch Brain Tumor Center at Duke, Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Peter Fecci
- The Preston Robert Tisch Brain Tumor Center at Duke, Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Ian Parney
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Victoria Wykes
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK; Department of Neurosurgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Colin Watts
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK; Department of Neurosurgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Terry C Burns
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Nader Sanai
- Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Matthias Preusser
- Department of Medicine I, Division of Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Joerg Christian Tonn
- Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Katharine J Drummond
- Department of Neurosurgery, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, VIC, Australia; Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Michael Platten
- Department of Neurology, Mannheim Center for Translational Neuroscience, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany; Clinical Cooperation Unit Brain Tumor Immunology (D170), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sunit Das
- Division of Neurosurgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Kirk Tanner
- National Brain Tumor Society, Newton, MA, USA
| | | | - Michael Weller
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA; Department of Neurology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - James R Whittle
- Department of Medical Biology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia; Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Personalised Oncology Division, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Mitchel S Berger
- Department of Neurological Surgery, UCSF Brain Tumor Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA; Weill Institute for Neuroscience, Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Mustafa Khasraw
- The Preston Robert Tisch Brain Tumor Center at Duke, Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ghosh S, Bhaskar R, Mishra R, Arockia Babu M, Abomughaid MM, Jha NK, Sinha JK. Neurological insights into brain-targeted cancer therapy and bioinspired microrobots. Drug Discov Today 2024; 29:104105. [PMID: 39029869 DOI: 10.1016/j.drudis.2024.104105] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2024] [Revised: 07/03/2024] [Accepted: 07/12/2024] [Indexed: 07/21/2024]
Abstract
Cancer, a multifaceted and pernicious disease, continuously challenges medicine, requiring innovative treatments. Brain cancers pose unique and daunting challenges due to the intricacies of the central nervous system and the blood-brain barrier. In this era of precision medicine, the convergence of neurology, oncology, and cutting-edge technology has given birth to a promising avenue - targeted cancer therapy. Furthermore, bioinspired microrobots have emerged as an ingenious approach to drug delivery, enabling precision and control in cancer treatment. This Keynote review explores the intricate web of neurological insights into brain-targeted cancer therapy and the paradigm-shifting world of bioinspired microrobots. It serves as a critical and comprehensive overview of these evolving fields, aiming to underscore their integration and potential for revolutionary cancer treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shampa Ghosh
- GloNeuro, Sector 107, Vishwakarma Road, Noida, Uttar Pradesh 201301, India
| | - Rakesh Bhaskar
- School of Chemical Engineering, Yeungnam University, Gyeonsang 38541, Republic of Korea; Research Institute of Cell Culture, Yeungnam University, Gyeonsang 38541, Republic of Korea
| | - Richa Mishra
- Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Parul University, Vadodara, Gujrat 391760, India
| | - M Arockia Babu
- Institute of Pharmaceutical Research, GLA University, Mathura, India
| | - Mosleh Mohammad Abomughaid
- Department of Medical Laboratory Sciences, College of Applied Medical Sciences, University of Bisha, Bisha 61922, Saudi Arabia
| | - Niraj Kumar Jha
- Centre of Research Impact and Outcome, Chitkara University, Rajpura 140401, Punjab, India; Centre for Global Health Research, Saveetha Medical College, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai, India; School of Bioengineering & Biosciences, Lovely Professional University, Phagwara 144411, India; Department of Biotechnology Engineering and Food Technology, Chandigarh University, Mohali, India.
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Rahman R, Shi DD, Reitman ZJ, Hamerlik P, de Groot JF, Haas-Kogan DA, D’Andrea AD, Sulman EP, Tanner K, Agar NYR, Sarkaria JN, Tinkle CL, Bindra RS, Mehta MP, Wen PY. DNA damage response in brain tumors: A Society for Neuro-Oncology consensus review on mechanisms and translational efforts in neuro-oncology. Neuro Oncol 2024; 26:1367-1387. [PMID: 38770568 PMCID: PMC11300028 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noae072] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/22/2024] Open
Abstract
DNA damage response (DDR) mechanisms are critical to maintenance of overall genomic stability, and their dysfunction can contribute to oncogenesis. Significant advances in our understanding of DDR pathways have raised the possibility of developing therapies that exploit these processes. In this expert-driven consensus review, we examine mechanisms of response to DNA damage, progress in development of DDR inhibitors in IDH-wild-type glioblastoma and IDH-mutant gliomas, and other important considerations such as biomarker development, preclinical models, combination therapies, mechanisms of resistance and clinical trial design considerations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rifaquat Rahman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Diana D Shi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Zachary J Reitman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Petra Hamerlik
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - John F de Groot
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Daphne A Haas-Kogan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Alan D D’Andrea
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Erik P Sulman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, New York University, New York, New York, USA
| | - Kirk Tanner
- National Brain Tumor Society, Newton, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Nathalie Y R Agar
- Department of Neurosurgery and Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Jann N Sarkaria
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Christopher L Tinkle
- Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA
| | - Ranjit S Bindra
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Minesh P Mehta
- Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Hospital, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Patrick Y Wen
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ahluwalia MS, Ozair A, Drappatz J, Ye X, Peng S, Lee M, Rath S, Dhruv H, Hao Y, Berens ME, Walbert T, Holdhoff M, Lesser GJ, Cloughesy TF, Sloan AE, Takebe N, Couce M, Peereboom DM, Nabors B, Wen PY, Grossman SA, Rogers LR. Evaluating the Base Excision Repair Inhibitor TRC102 and Temozolomide for Patients with Recurrent Glioblastoma in the Phase 2 Adult Brain Tumor Consortium Trial BERT. Clin Cancer Res 2024; 30:3167-3178. [PMID: 38836759 PMCID: PMC11293959 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-23-4098] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2024] [Revised: 03/20/2024] [Accepted: 05/10/2024] [Indexed: 06/06/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Patients with glioblastoma (GBM) have a dismal prognosis. Although the DNA alkylating agent temozolomide (TMZ) is the mainstay of chemotherapy, therapeutic resistance rapidly develops in patients. Base excision repair inhibitor TRC102 (methoxyamine) reverses TMZ resistance in preclinical glioma models. We aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of oral TRC102+TMZ in recurrent GBM (rGBM). PATIENTS AND METHODS A preregistered (NCT02395692), nonrandomized, multicenter, phase 2 clinical trial (BERT) was planned and conducted through the Adult Brain Tumor Consortium (ABTC-1402). Arm 1 included patients with bevacizumab-naïve GBM at the first recurrence, with the primary endpoint of response rates. If sufficient activity was identified, a second arm was planned for the bevacizumab-refractory patients. The secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), PFS at 6 months (PFS6), and toxicity. RESULTS Arm 1 enrolled 19 patients with a median of two treatment cycles. Objective responses were not observed; hence, arm 2 did not open. The median OS was 11.1 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 8.2-17.9]. The median PFS was 1.9 months (95% CI, 1.8-3.7). The PFS6 was 10.5% (95% CI, 1.3%-33.1%). Most toxicities were grades 1 and 2, with two grade 3 lymphopenias and one grade 4 thrombocytopenia. Two patients with PFS ≥ 17 months and OS > 32 months were deemed "extended survivors." RNA sequencing of tumor tissue, obtained at diagnosis, demonstrated significantly enriched signatures of DNA damage response (DDR), chromosomal instability (CIN70, CIN25), and cellular proliferation (PCNA25) in "extended survivors." CONCLUSIONS These findings confirm the safety and feasibility of TRC102+TMZ in patients with rGBM. They also warrant further evaluation of combination therapy in biomarker-enriched trials enrolling GBM patients with baseline hyperactivated DDR pathways.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manmeet S. Ahluwalia
- Rose and Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
- Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL, USA
- Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Ahmad Ozair
- Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL, USA
- Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Jan Drappatz
- Department of Neurology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Xiaobu Ye
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Sen Peng
- Brain Tumor Unit, Translational Genomics Research Institute, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Matthew Lee
- Brain Tumor Unit, Translational Genomics Research Institute, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Sanhita Rath
- Brain Tumor Unit, Translational Genomics Research Institute, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Harshil Dhruv
- Brain Tumor Unit, Translational Genomics Research Institute, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Yue Hao
- Brain Tumor Unit, Translational Genomics Research Institute, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Michael E. Berens
- Brain Tumor Unit, Translational Genomics Research Institute, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Tobias Walbert
- Department of Neurosurgery, Henry Ford Health, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Matthias Holdhoff
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Glenn J. Lesser
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Wake Forest Medical Center, Winston, NC, USA
| | | | - Andrew E. Sloan
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, Piedmont Healthcare, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Naoko Takebe
- Developmental Therapeutics Clinic, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Marta Couce
- Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - David M. Peereboom
- Rose and Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Burt Nabors
- Department of Neurology, Heersink School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Patrick Y. Wen
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Stuart A. Grossman
- Department of Neurology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Lisa R. Rogers
- Department of Neurosurgery, Henry Ford Health, Detroit, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Satomi K, Ichimura K, Shibahara J. Decoding the DNA methylome of central nervous system tumors: An emerging modality for integrated diagnosis. Pathol Int 2024; 74:51-67. [PMID: 38224248 DOI: 10.1111/pin.13402] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2023] [Revised: 12/16/2023] [Accepted: 12/18/2023] [Indexed: 01/16/2024]
Abstract
The definitive diagnosis and classification of individual cancers are crucial for patient care and cancer research. To achieve a robust diagnosis of central nervous system (CNS) tumors, a genotype-phenotype integrated diagnostic approach was introduced in recent versions of the World Health Organization classification, followed by the incorporation of a genome-wide DNA methylome-based classification. Microarray-based platforms are widely used to obtain DNA methylome data, and the German Cancer Research Center (Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum [DKFZ]) has a webtool for a DNA methylation-based classifier (DKFZ classifier). Integration of DNA methylome will further enhance the precision of CNS tumor classification, especially in diagnostically challenging cases. However, in the clinical application of DNA methylome-based classification, challenges related to data interpretation persist, in addition to technical caveats, regulations, and limited accessibility. Dimensionality reduction (DMR) can complement integrated diagnosis by visualizing a profile and comparing it with other known samples. Therefore, DNA methylome-based classification is a highly useful research tool for auxiliary analysis in challenging diagnostic and rare disease cases, and for establishing novel tumor concepts. Decoding the DNA methylome, especially by DMR in addition to DKFZ classifier, emphasizes the capability of grasping the fundamental biological principles that provide new perspectives on CNS tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kaishi Satomi
- Department of Pathology, Kyorin University Faculty of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Koichi Ichimura
- Department of Brain Disease Translational Research, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Junji Shibahara
- Department of Pathology, Kyorin University Faculty of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Ahluwalia MS, Rogers LR, Chaudhary R, Newton H, Ozair A, Khosla AA, Nixon AB, Adams BJ, Seon BK, Peereboom DM, Theuer CP. Endoglin inhibitor TRC105 with or without bevacizumab for bevacizumab-refractory glioblastoma (ENDOT): a multicenter phase II trial. COMMUNICATIONS MEDICINE 2023; 3:120. [PMID: 37684373 PMCID: PMC10491825 DOI: 10.1038/s43856-023-00347-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2023] [Accepted: 08/04/2023] [Indexed: 09/10/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Glioblastoma (GBM), the most lethal primary brain tumor, has limited treatment options upon recurrence after chemoradiation and bevacizumab. TRC105 (carotuximab), a chimeric anti-endoglin (CD105) antibody, inhibits angiogenesis and potentiates activity of VEGF inhibitor bevacizumab in preclinical models. This study sought to assess safety, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy of TRC105 for bevacizumab-refractory GBM. METHODS We conducted a pre-registered (NCT01564914), multicenter, open-label phase II clinical trial (ENDOT). We administered 10 mg/kg TRC105 monotherapy (first cohort) in adults with GBM and radiographic progression following radiation, temozolomide and bevacizumab therapy. Primary outcome was median time-to-progression (TTP), amended after first cohort's enrollment to median overall survival (mOS). Secondary outcomes were objective response rate, safety and tolerability, and progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS 6 patients were enrolled in TRC105 monotherapy cohort. Median TTP and PFS of 5 evaluable patients receiving monotherapy was 1.4 months, in whom plasma VEGF-A levels were elevated post-therapy. Lack of response led to protocol amendment, and second cohort's addition of bevacizumab+TRC105 with primary endpoint of mOS. 16 patients were enrolled in bevacizumab+TRC105 cohort. mOS of 15 evaluable patients was 5.7 (95%CI: 4.2-9.8) months. All 22 patients had measurable disease at baseline. Median PFS of 14 evaluable patients receiving bevacizumab+TRC105 was 1.8 months (95%CI 1.2-2.1). Serum TRC105 was measurable above target concentration of 25 ug/mL in all evaluable patients. Study medications were well-tolerated in both cohorts. Combined administration did not potentiate known toxicities of either medication, with cerebral hemorrhage not observed. CONCLUSIONS Single-agent TRC105 lacks activity in bevacizumab-refractory GBM, possibly secondary to upregulated VEGF-A expression. Meaningful mOS in bevacizumab+TRC105 cohort warrants further trials to investigate efficacy of combination therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manmeet S Ahluwalia
- Rose and Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
- Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL, USA.
- Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, FL, USA.
| | - Lisa R Rogers
- Department of Neurosurgery, Henry Ford Health, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Rekha Chaudhary
- Division of Hematology & Oncology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Herbert Newton
- Department of Neurology, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
- Department of Neurology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Ahmad Ozair
- Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL, USA
- Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Atulya A Khosla
- Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL, USA
- Department of Internal Medicine, William Beaumont University Hospital, Royal Oak, MI, USA
| | | | | | - Ben K Seon
- Department of Immunology, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - David M Peereboom
- Rose and Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|