1
|
Chen R, Yu Y, Zhang J, Song C, Wang C. Efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant therapy for HR-positive/HER2-negative early breast cancer: a Bayesian network meta-analysis. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2024; 24:599-611. [PMID: 38693054 DOI: 10.1080/14737140.2024.2350105] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2023] [Accepted: 04/25/2024] [Indexed: 05/03/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Neoadjuvant treatment for hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HR+/HER2-) breast cancer is controversial and requires a comprehensive analysis for optimal therapy assessment. Therefore, a two-step Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) was performed to compare the efficacy and safety of different neoadjuvant regimens. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Phase II/III randomized clinical trials comparing various neoadjuvant therapies for HR+/HER2- breast cancer were included. NMA and pairwise meta-analyses were conducted using Stata (version 14), R (version 4.2.3), and Review Manager 5.4. RESULTS Twenty-eight studies (5,625 patients) were eligible. NMA of objective response rate (ORR) indicated the highest SUCRA for chemotherapy (CT) and chemotherapy with anthracycline (CT(A)). Pathologic complete response (PCR) NMA demonstrated significant PCR improvement with chemotherapy regimens containing programmed cell death protein-1 and programmed cell death ligand-1 inhibitors (PD-1i/PD-L1i) and poly ADP-ribose polymerase inhibitors (PARPi). Combined analysis considering both the ORR and safety highlighted CT(A)'s efficacy and toxicity balance. CONCLUSIONS CT(A) and CT showed improved ORR compared with alternative regimens. CT(A) combined with PD-1/PD-L1 or PARP inhibitors significantly increased PCR rates. Comprehensive assessment of both ORR and safety indicated that CT(A) represents an optimal neoadjuvant therapy for HR+/HER2- breast cancer, whereas AI + CDK4/6 inhibitors rank solely behind chemotherapy. REGISTRATION PROSPERO Registration: CRD42024538948. International Platform of Registered Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (INPLASY) registration number INPLASY202440092.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruiliang Chen
- Department of Breast Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian Province, China
- Department of General Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian Province, China
- Breast Cancer Institute, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian Province, China
| | - Yushuai Yu
- Breast Cancer Institute, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian Province, China
- Department of Breast Surgery, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian Province, China
| | - Jie Zhang
- Department of Breast Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian Province, China
- Department of General Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian Province, China
- Breast Cancer Institute, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian Province, China
| | - Chuangui Song
- Breast Cancer Institute, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian Province, China
- Department of Breast Surgery, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian Province, China
| | - Chuan Wang
- Department of Breast Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian Province, China
- Department of General Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian Province, China
- Breast Cancer Institute, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Apostolidou K, Zografos E, Papatheodoridi MA, Fiste O, Dimopoulos MA, Zagouri F. Oral SERDs alone or in combination with CDK 4/6 inhibitors in breast cancer: Current perspectives and clinical trials. Breast 2024; 75:103729. [PMID: 38599049 PMCID: PMC11011217 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2024.103729] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2023] [Revised: 03/25/2024] [Accepted: 04/03/2024] [Indexed: 04/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Over the past few decades, first-line therapy for treating advanced and metastatic HR+/HER2-breast cancer has transformed due to the introduction of adjuvant endocrine therapy with cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK 4/6i). However, there is an unmet need for novel classes of endocrine therapy with superior efficacy to improve treatment outcomes and overcome CDK4/6i resistance. New generation selective estrogen receptor degraders (SERDs), orally administered and with higher bioavailability, could potentially be the novel compounds to meet this emerging need. In this paper, we review accredited clinical studies on the combining effects of CDK4/6 inhibitors and oral SERDs, report efficacy of treatment data when available, and provide a framework for future research focusing on these promising agents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kleoniki Apostolidou
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, Alexandra Hospital, Medical School, Athens, 11528, Greece.
| | - Eleni Zografos
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, Alexandra Hospital, Medical School, Athens, 11528, Greece
| | | | - Oraianthi Fiste
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, Alexandra Hospital, Medical School, Athens, 11528, Greece
| | | | - Flora Zagouri
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, Alexandra Hospital, Medical School, Athens, 11528, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Corti C, Batra-Sharma H, Kelsten M, Shatsky RA, Garrido-Castro AC, Gradishar WJ. Systemic Therapy in Breast Cancer. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book 2024; 44:e432442. [PMID: 39013124 DOI: 10.1200/edbk_432442] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/18/2024]
Abstract
Therapeutic advances in breast cancer have significantly improved outcomes in recent decades. In the early setting, there has been a gradual shift from adjuvant-only to neoadjuvant strategies, with a growing focus on customizing post-neoadjuvant treatments through escalation and de-escalation based on pathologic response. At the same time, the transition from a pre-genomic to a post-genomic era, utilizing specific assays in the adjuvant setting and targeted sequencing in the advanced stage, has deepened our understanding of disease biology and aided in identifying molecular markers associated with treatment benefit. Finally, the introduction of new drug classes such as antibody-drug conjugates, and the incorporation in the (neo)adjuvant setting of therapies previously investigated in the advanced stage, like immunotherapy and CDK4-6 inhibitors, poses new challenges in treatment sequencing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chiara Corti
- Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard University, Boston, MA
| | | | - Max Kelsten
- Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
| | | | | | - William J Gradishar
- Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Toska E. Epigenetic mechanisms of cancer progression and therapy resistance in estrogen-receptor (ER+) breast cancer. Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer 2024; 1879:189097. [PMID: 38518961 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbcan.2024.189097] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2024] [Revised: 03/16/2024] [Accepted: 03/19/2024] [Indexed: 03/24/2024]
Abstract
Estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancer is the most frequent breast cancer subtype. Agents targeting the ER signaling pathway have been successful in reducing mortality from breast cancer for decades. However, mechanisms of resistance to these treatments arise, especially in the metastatic setting. Recently, it has been recognized that epigenetic dysregulation is a common feature that facilitates the acquisition of cancer hallmarks across cancer types, including ER+ breast cancer. Alterations in epigenetic regulators and transcription factors (TF) coupled with changes to the chromatin landscape have been found to orchestrate breast oncogenesis, metastasis, and the development of a resistant phenotype. Here, we review recent advances in our understanding of how the epigenome dictates breast cancer tumorigenesis and resistance to targeted therapies and discuss novel therapeutic interventions for overcoming resistance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eneda Toska
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center and Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Stravodimou A, Voutsadakis IA. Neo-adjuvant therapies for ER positive/HER2 negative breast cancers: from chemotherapy to hormonal therapy, CDK inhibitors, and beyond. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2024; 24:117-135. [PMID: 38475990 DOI: 10.1080/14737140.2024.2330601] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2023] [Accepted: 02/02/2024] [Indexed: 03/14/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Chemotherapy has been traditionally used as neo-adjuvant therapy in breast cancer for down-staging of locally advanced disease in all sub-types. In the adjuvant setting, genomic assays have shown that a significant proportion of ER positive/HER2 negative patients do not derive benefit from the addition of chemotherapy to adjuvant endocrine therapy. An interest in hormonal treatments as neo-adjuvant therapies in ER positive/HER2 negative cancers has been borne by their documented success in the adjuvant setting. Moreover, cytotoxic chemotherapy is less effective in ER positive/HER2 negative disease compared with other breast cancer subtypes in obtaining pathologic complete responses. AREAS COVERED Neo-adjuvant therapies for ER positive/HER2 negative breast cancers and associated biomarkers are reviewed, using a Medline survey. A focus of discussion is the prediction of patients that are unlikely to derive extra benefit from chemotherapy and have the highest probabilities of benefiting from hormonal and other targeted therapies. EXPERT OPINION Predictive biomarkers of response to neo-adjuvant chemotherapy and hormonal therapies are instrumental for selecting ER positive/HER2 negative breast cancer patients for each treatment. Chemotherapy remains the standard of care for many of those patients requiring neo-adjuvant treatment, but other neo-adjuvant therapies are increasingly used.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Athina Stravodimou
- Department of Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Ioannis A Voutsadakis
- Algoma District Cancer Program, Sault Area Hospital, Sault Ste Marie, Ontario, Canada
- Division of Clinical Sciences, Northern Ontario School of Medicine, Sudbury, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Malhi V, Agarwal P, Gates MR, Liu L, Wang J, De Bruyn T, Lam S, Eng-Wong J, Perez-Moreno P, Chen YC, Yu J. Optimizing Early-stage Clinical Pharmacology Evaluation to Accelerate Clinical Development of Giredestrant in Advanced Breast Cancer. CANCER RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS 2023; 3:2551-2559. [PMID: 38019116 PMCID: PMC10722959 DOI: 10.1158/2767-9764.crc-23-0324] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2023] [Revised: 10/11/2023] [Accepted: 11/22/2023] [Indexed: 11/30/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE We describe the clinical pharmacology characterization of giredestrant in a first-in-human study. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN This phase Ia/Ib dose-escalation/-expansion study (NCT03332797) evaluated the safety, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and preliminary antitumor activity of giredestrant in estrogen receptor-positive HER2-negative locally advanced/metastatic breast cancer. The single-agent dose-escalation stage evaluated giredestrant 10, 30, 90, or 250 mg once daily. The dose-expansion stage evaluated single-agent giredestrant at 30, 100, and 250 mg once daily. Dose-escalation and -expansion phases also evaluated giredestrant 100 mg combined with palbociclib 125 mg. RESULTS Following single-dose oral administration, giredestrant was rapidly absorbed and generally showed a dose-proportional increase in exposure at doses ranging from 10 to 250 mg. At the 30 mg clinical dose, maximum plasma concentration was 266 ng/mL (50.1%) and area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 hours at steady state was 4,320 ng·hour/mL (59.4%). Minimal giredestrant concentrations were detected in urine, indicating that renal excretion is unlikely to be a major elimination route for giredestrant. Mean concentration of 4beta-hydroxycholesterol showed no apparent increase over time at both the clinical dose (30 mg) and a supratherapeutic dose (90 mg), suggesting that giredestrant may have low CYP3A induction potential in humans. No clinically relevant drug-drug interaction was observed between giredestrant and palbociclib. Giredestrant exposure was not affected by food and was generally consistent between White and Asian patients. CONCLUSIONS This study illustrates how the integration of clinical pharmacology considerations into early-phase clinical trials can inform the design of pivotal studies and accelerate oncology drug development. SIGNIFICANCE This work illustrates how comprehensive clinical pharmacology characterization can be integrated into first-in-human studies in oncology. It also demonstrates the value of understanding clinical pharmacology attributes to inform eligibility, concomitant medications, and combination dosing and to directly influence late-stage trial design and accelerate development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vikram Malhi
- Clinical Pharmacology, Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, California
| | - Priya Agarwal
- Clinical Pharmacology, Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, California
| | - Mary R. Gates
- Early Clinical Development, Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, California
| | - Lichuan Liu
- Clinical Pharmacology, Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, California
| | - Jianshuang Wang
- Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics, Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, California
| | - Tom De Bruyn
- Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics, Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, California
| | - Scott Lam
- BioAnalytical Sciences, Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, California
| | - Jennifer Eng-Wong
- Early Clinical Development, Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, California
| | - Pablo Perez-Moreno
- Product Development Oncology, Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, California
| | - Ya-Chi Chen
- Clinical Pharmacology, Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, California
| | - Jiajie Yu
- Clinical Pharmacology, Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, California
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Toi M, Aruga T. SERDs for primary breast cancer. Lancet Oncol 2023; 24:947-949. [PMID: 37657466 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(23)00291-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2023] [Revised: 06/13/2023] [Accepted: 06/14/2023] [Indexed: 09/03/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Masakazu Toi
- Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Disease Centre, Komagome Hospital, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8677, Japan.
| | - Tomoyuki Aruga
- Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Disease Centre, Komagome Hospital, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8677, Japan
| |
Collapse
|