What is the preferred method for timing natural cycle frozen–thawed embryo transfer?

Does hCG-trigger in the mild stimulation protocol for endometrial preparation have any effect on pregnancy outcome in frozen-thawed embryo transfer?

BACKGROUND

Recent literature has explored the role of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) triggering in frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles with natural endometrial preparation. Despite this, the impact of hCG triggering on pregnancy outcomes following endometrial preparation with mild stimulation (mST) using Letrozole and Gonadotropins remains inadequately characterized. This study aimed to elucidate the effects of hCG-trigger on pregnancy outcomes in mST-FET cycles.

METHODS

In the present retrospective cohort study, the pregnancy outcomes of 409 eligible patients who underwent FET cycles with endometrial preparation using a mild ovarian stimulation protocol by letrozole plus low dose gonadotropins at the Royan Institute between 2020 and 2022, were investigated. The study population were segregated into two distinct groups according to type of ovulation: the spontaneous ovulation group (n = 138) and the hCG-trigger group (n = 271). The pregnancy outcomes including implantation and clinical pregnancy rates (CPR) and live birth rates (LBR) were compared between two groups. The multivariable logistic regression was performed to detect the most significant variables related to the LBR in the mST-FET cycles.

RESULTS

Demographic and baseline characteristics were comparable between groups. No significant difference was found in terms of implantation rate (0.65 ± 0.32 vs. 0.60 ± 0.30, P-value: 0.31), CPR (37% vs. 39.7%, P-value: 0.53), and LBR (35.5% vs. 37.3%, P-value: 0.74) in the spontaneous ovulation and hCG-trigger groups, respectively. The logistic regression analysis revealed that only the stage of the transferred embryo exhibited a significant relationship with LBR (blastocyst vs. cleavage: odds ratio (OR); 2.33, 95% confidence interval (CI):1.41-3.86, P-value = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Pregnancy outcomes in the mST-FET cycles, including implantation rate, CPR, and LBR are comparable in cycles with or without hCG triggering. Based on the findings from multivariate regression analysis, the sole significant predictive factor for the LBR was the transfer of blastocyst embryos. It is recommended that these results be examined and discussed in future prospective studies with a larger sample size, considering the lack of comparable research in this field.

Ideal frozen embryo transfer regime

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review aims to compare evidence on four criteria (embryo implantation, obstetric outcomes, patient convenience, and IVF-unit efficiency) by analyzing published research on different endometrial preparation methods for frozen embryo transfer (FET).

RECENT FINDINGS

While the artificial-FET cycle provides advantages in scheduling and implantation, it falls short in ensuring optimal obstetric outcomes. In contrast, natural-FET ensures embryo implantation conditions if ovulation is correctly identified. Supplementing with exogenous progesterone shields against low corpus luteum progesterone secretion, crucial for positive obstetric outcomes. In mNC-FET, ovulation is hCG-triggered, closely resembling natural cycles and reducing monitoring visits for enhanced patient convenience.Letrozole is a recommended option for anovulatory patients, preserving endometrial thickness. It is cost-effective, less likely to induce multifollicular development than gonadotropins, and better tolerated.In a novel approach, the natural-proliferative-phase-FET initiates progesterone in an unmediated ovulatory cycle at 7 mm endometrial thickness, combining the benefits of a natural proliferative endometrium with the convenience of scheduled artificial cycles.

SUMMARY

The artificial cycle offers scheduling advantages, but may compromise obstetric outcomes. Natural FET relies on accurate ovulation timing for successful implantation. mNC-FET simplifies the process using hCG induction, minimizing clinic visits for improved convenience. Letrozole is highlighted as a cost-effective and well tolerated option in anovulatory patients. A recent innovative approach combines elements of natural and artificial cycles, showing promise for FET procedures.

Home-based monitoring of ovulation to time frozen embryo transfers in the Netherlands (Antarctica-2): an open-label, nationwide, randomised, non-inferiority trial

BACKGROUND

The growing field of assisted reproductive techniques, including frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET), should lead the way to the best sustainable health care without compromising pregnancy chances. Correct timing of FET is crucial to allow implantation of the thawed embryo. Nowadays, timing based on hospital-controlled monitoring of ovulation in the natural cycle of a woman is the preferred strategy because of the assumption of favourable fertility prospects. However, home-based monitoring is a simple method to prevent patient travel and any associated environmental concerns. We compared ongoing pregnancy rates after home-based monitoring versus hospital-controlled monitoring with ovulation triggering.

METHODS

This open-label, multicentre, randomised, non-inferiority trial was undertaken in 23 hospitals and clinics in the Netherlands. Women aged between 18 and 44 years with a regular ovulatory menstrual cycle were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio via a web-based randomisation program to home-based monitoring or hospital-controlled monitoring. Those who analysed the data were masked to the groups; those collecting the data were not. All endpoints were analysed by intention to treat and per protocol. Non-inferiority was established when the lower limit of the 90% CI exceeded -4%. This study was registered at the Dutch Trial Register (Trial NL6414).

FINDINGS

1464 women were randomly assigned between April 10, 2018, and April 13, 2022, with 732 allocated to home-based monitoring and 732 to hospital-controlled monitoring. Ongoing pregnancy occurred in 152 (20·8%) of 732 in the home-based monitoring group and in 153 (20·9%) of 732 in the hospital-controlled monitoring group (risk ratio [RR] 0·99 [90% CI 0·81 to 1·22]; risk difference [RD] -0·14 [90% CI -3·63 to 3·36]). The per-protocol analysis confirmed non-inferiority (152 [21·0%] of 725 vs 153 [21·0%] of 727; RR 1·00 (90% CI 0·81 to 1·23); RD -0·08 [90% CI -3·60 to 3·44]).

INTERPRETATION

Home-based monitoring of ovulation is non-inferior to hospital-controlled monitoring of ovulation to time FET.

FUNDING

The Dutch Organisation for Health Research and Development.

Natural Cycle Frozen Embryo Transfer: Evaluating Optimal Protocols for Preparation and Timing

Background

While natural cycle frozen embryo transfer (NC-FET) is becoming increasingly common, significant practice variation exists in the use of ovulation induction medications, administration of ovulation trigger, and timing of embryo transfer without consensus as to the optimal protocol.

Aims

The objective of this study is to evaluate the association of key aspects of the NC-FET protocol with implantation, pregnancy and live birth.

Settings and Design

This was a retrospective cohort study of blastocyst stage NC-FET cycles from October 2019 to July 2021 at a single academic fertility centre.

Materials and Methods

Protocols varied between cycles across three key parameters which were evaluated as primary predictors of cycle outcomes: (1) use of letrozole for mild ovarian stimulation/ovulation induction, (2) administration of exogenous ovulation trigger versus spontaneous luteinising hormone surge and (3) transfer timing based on ovulation trigger versus sequential progesterone monitoring. Primary outcomes included implantation rate, clinical pregnancy and ongoing pregnancy.

Statistical Analysis Used

Generalised estimating equations were fitted to obtain adjusted odds ratios or rate ratios as appropriate with 95% confidence intervals for each outcome across the three primary predictors.

Results

A total of 183 cycles from 170 unique patients were eligible for inclusion. The average implantation rate was 0.58, resulting in an overall clinical pregnancy and ongoing pregnancy rate of 59.0% and 51.4%, respectively. After adjusting for age at embryo freeze and history of a failed embryo transfer, there were no significant associations between any predictor and implantation rate, clinical pregnancy, ongoing pregnancy, or live birth.

Conclusion

In NC-FET, a variety of preparation and timing protocols may lead to comparable cycle outcomes, potentially allowing for flexibility on the basis of patient and physician preference. These findings warrant validation in a larger, randomised trial.

Ovulatory-cycle frozen embryo transfer: spontaneous or triggered ovulation and the impact of LH elevation at hCG triggering

The effect of the luteinizing hormone (LH) elevation before the human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) trigger in ovulatory frozen-thawed embryo transfer (Ovu-FET) cycles has not been determined. We aimed to investigate whether triggering ovulation in Ovu-FET cycles affects the live birth rate (LBR), and the contribution of elevated LH at the time of hCG trigger. This retrospective study included Ovu-FET cycles performed in our center from August 2016 to April 2021. Modified Ovu-FET (hCG trigger) and true Ovu-FET (without hCG trigger) were compared. The modified group was divided according to whether hCG was administered, before or after LH increased to > 15 IU/L and was twice the baseline value. The modified (n = 100) and true (n = 246) Ovu-FET groups and both subgroups of the modified Ovu-FET, those who were triggered before (n = 67) or after (n = 33) LH elevation, had comparable characteristics at baseline. Comparison of true vs. modified Ovu-FET outcomes revealed similar LBR (35.4% vs. 32.0%; P = 0.62), respectively. LBR were similar between the modified Ovu-FET subgroups regardless of the hCG trigger timing (31.3% before vs. 33.3% after LH elevation; P = 0.84). In conclusion, LBR of Ovu-FET were not affected by hCG trigger or whether LH was elevated at the time of hCG trigger. These results add reassurance regarding hCG triggering even after LH elevation.

Comparing the success rate of natural cycle and modified natural cycle protocols for frozen-thawed embryo transfer

Objective: The aim of the present study is to compare the effects of Natural Cycle and modified Natural Cycle protocols for frozen-thawed embryo transfer on clinical pregnancy rate and live birth rate. Methods: This prospective randomized controlled trial comprised 145 patients scheduled for frozen-thawed embryo transfer and was conducted at a university hospital between 2019 and 2021. The Natural Cycle protocol was administered to 73 patients and the modified Natural Cycle protocol to 72 patients and the clinical outcome was compared between the groups. The main outcome measure was live birth rate. Results: Baseline characteristics and cycle parameters were similar in both groups. There was no difference in clinical pregnancy rate (58.9% and 54.2%, respectively; p = .565) and live birth rate between the Natural Cycle and modified Natural Cycle groups (49.3% and 48.6% respectively; p = .932). Conclusion: This study established that clinical pregnancy and live birth rates were not affected by natural cycle ovulation being spontaneous or hCG-triggered among patients undergoing frozen-thawed embryo transfer. Thus, the protocol for natural cycle frozen-thawed embryo transfers should be chosen according to the priorities of the patient and the physician.

Frozen-thawed embryo transfer in modified natural cycles: a retrospective analysis of pregnancy outcomes in ovulatory women with vs. without spontaneous luteinizing hormone surge

Background

Timing of frozen embryo transfer (FET) in natural endometrial preparation cycles is often based on luteinizing hormone (LH) surge. However, some patients do not show spontaneous LH surge despite follicular maturation. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of spontaneous LH surge on pregnancy outcomes in modified natural cycles (mNC).

Methods

This retrospective analysis included 1897 FET cycles with modified natural endometrial preparation in normo-ovulatory women between January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2019, at our center: 920 cycles with spontaneous LH surge (≥ 20 IU/L) and 977 without. For cleavage embryos, FET was conducted 4 and 5 days after hCG injection in women with and without LH surge, respectively. For blastocysts, FET was conducted 6 and 7 days after hCG injection in women with and without LH surge, respectively. Multivariate regression was conducted to examine the factors associated with live birth.

Results

Live birth rate was 43.7% in patients with spontaneous LH surge vs. 43.8% in women without LH surge (P = 0.961). The two groups also had similar implantation rate (36.2% vs. 36.7%, P = 0.772), biochemical pregnancy rate (54.8% vs. 55.4%, P = 0.796) and clinical pregnancy rate (50.9% vs. 51.7%, P = 0.721). In multivariate regression, live birth was not associated with LH surge (aOR, 0.947, 95% CI, 0.769, 1.166).

Conclusion

Pregnancy outcomes were similar in mNC-FET in cycles with vs. without spontaneous LH surge if FET timing is adjusted.

Natural cycles achieve better pregnancy outcomes than artificial cycles in non-PCOS women undergoing vitrified single-blastocyst transfer: a retrospective cohort study of 6840 cycles

PURPOSE

To identify the optimal method for endometrial preparation in vitrified single-blastocyst transfer (VSBT) cycles.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study for non-PCOS patients who underwent VSBT cycles from March 2015 to November 2019 in an academic reproductive medical center. A total of 6840 VSBT cycles were enrolled and classified into two groups according to different endometrial preparation methods.

RESULTS

The non-PCOS patients who underwent VSBT showed a significantly higher clinical pregnancy rate (61.96% vs 56.85%, p < 0.001) and live birth rate (49.09% vs 39.86%, p < 0.001), as well as a statistically lower early miscarriage rate (12.02% vs 18.08%, p < 0.001) in the natural cycle (NC) group compared with the artificial cycle (AC) group. Multivariable analysis further confirmed that NC was associated with an increased likelihood of clinical pregnancy (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 0.852, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.765-0.949, p = 0.004) and live birth (aOR 0.746, 95% CI 0.669-0.832, p < 0 .001), but decreased early miscarriage occurrence (aOR 1.447, 95% CI 1.215-1.724, p < 0.001) compared to AC.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrated that non-PCOS patients could benefit from NC in vitrified blastocyst transfer. Increased clinical pregnancy rate and decreased early miscarriage rate led to a significantly higher live birth rate in NC patients compared with AC with our present protocol.

A randomized controlled trial of vaginal progesterone for luteal phase support in modified natural cycle - frozen embryo transfer

OBJECTIVE

Our aim was to study whether luteal phase support (LPS) increases the live-birth rate (LBR) in women undergoing modified natural cycle (mNC) frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET).

METHODS

In a randomized controlled trial, conducted at a university-affiliated tertiary medical center, a total of 59 patients aged 18-45 years, underwent mNC-FET. FET was performed in mNC following ovulation triggering by hCG. Patients were randomized into two groups; The No-LPS Group included 28 women who did not receive LPS, and the LPS Group included 31 women who received vaginal progesterone for LPS. The main outcome measure was LBR.

RESULTS

Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics were comparable between the study groups. The no-LPS group and the LPS group did not differ with regard to clinical pregnancy rate (21.4% vs. 32.3%; respectively, p = .35), LBR (17.9% vs. 19.4%; respectively, p = .88), or spontaneous miscarriage rate (3.6% vs. 12.9%; respectively, p = .35). On multivariate logistic regression analysis, LPS was not associated with LBR after controlling for confounders.

CONCLUSION

The results of our study suggest that LPS after mNC-FET does not improve the reproductive outcome, and therefore, might not be necessary.C linicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT01483365.

Preparation of the Endometrium for Frozen Embryo Transfer: A Systematic Review

Despite the worldwide increase in frozen embryo transfer, the search for the best protocol to prime endometrium continues. Well-designed trials comparing various frozen embryo transfer protocols in terms of live birth rates, maternal, obstetric and neonatal outcome are urgently required. Currently, low-quality evidence indicates that, natural cycle, either true natural cycle or modified natural cycle, is superior to hormone replacement treatment protocol. Regarding warmed blastocyst transfer and frozen embryo transfer timing, the evidence suggests the 6th day of progesterone start, LH surge+6 day and hCG+7 day in hormone replacement treatment, true natural cycle and modified natural cycle protocols, respectively. Time corrections, due to inter-personal differences in the window of implantation or day of vitrification (day 5 or 6), should be explored further. Recently available evidence clearly indicates that, in hormone replacement treatment and natural cycles, there might be marked inter-personal variation in serum progesterone levels with an impact on reproductive outcomes, despite the use of the same dose and route of progesterone administration. The place of progesterone rescue protocols in patients with low serum progesterone levels one day prior to warmed blastocyst transfer in hormone replacement treatment and natural cycles is likely to be intensively explored in near future.

Effect of unplanned spontaneous follicular growth and ovulation on pregnancy outcomes in planned artificial frozen embryo transfer cycles: a propensity score matching study

STUDY QUESTION

Does unplanned spontaneous follicular growth and ovulation affect clinical outcomes after planned artificial frozen-thawed embryo transfer (AC-FET) cycles?

SUMMARY ANSWER

AC-FET and spontaneous follicular growth and ovulation events resulted in notably better pregnancy outcomes with a significantly higher implantation rate (IR), clinical pregnancy rate (CPR), ongoing pregnancy rate (OPR) and live birth rate (LBR) and a significantly lower miscarriage rate.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

The AC-FET protocol without GnRH agonist administration is associated with a low incidence of follicular growth and ovulation. In the literature, authors often refer to these types of cycles with concern due to possibly impaired FET outcomes. However, the real impact of such cycles has yet to be elucidated due to the lack of existing data.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

This was a retrospective clinical study involving 2256 AC-FET cycles conducted between January 2017 and August 2019. Propensity score (PS) matching was used to control for confounding variables.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

Subjects were divided into two groups: a study group: cycles with spontaneous follicular growth and ovulation (the maximum diameter of follicles in any ovary was ≥14 mm and ovulation was confirmed by consecutive ultrasound examinations) and a control group featuring cycles without growing follicles (the maximum diameter of follicles in both ovaries were <10 mm). The study group was matched by PS with the control group at a ratio of 1:2. The study group consisted of 195 patients before PS matching and 176 patients after matching. The numbers of participants in the control group before and after PS matching were 2061 and 329, respectively.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

This analysis showed that patient age (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.05; 95% CI 1.01-1.09; P=0.010) and basal FSH level (aOR 1.06; 95% CI 1.01-1.11; P=0.012) were significantly and positively related with the spontaneous follicular growth and ovulation event. In addition, this event was negatively correlated with BMI (aOR 0.92; 95% CI 0.87-0.97; P=0.002), AMH level (aOR 0.66; 95% CI 0.59-0.74; P<0.001) and a high starting oestrogen dose (aOR 0.53; 95% CI 0.38-0.76 for 6 mg vs. 4 mg; P<0.001). Baseline characteristics were similar between groups after PS matching. Patients in the study group had a significantly higher IR (28.8% vs. 21.8%, P=0.016), CPR (44.9% vs. 33.4%, P=0.011), OPR (39.2% vs. 26.1%, P=0.002) and LBR (39.2% vs. 24.9%, P=0.001) and a lower miscarriage rate (12.7% vs. 25.5%, P=0.030), compared with those in the control group.

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

This was a retrospective study carried out in a single centre and was therefore susceptible to bias. In addition, we only analysed patients with normal ovulation patterns and excluded those with follicular growth but without ovulation. Further studies remain necessary to confirm our results.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

It is not necessary to cancel cycles that experience spontaneous follicular growth and ovulation. Our data support promising clinical outcomes after this event. Our findings are important as they can better inform clinicians and patients.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

This research was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 81701507, 81801404, 81871210, 82071648), Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (grant no. BK20171126, BK20201123) and Jiangsu Province '333' project. The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

N/A.

To trigger or not to trigger ovulation in a natural cycle for frozen embryo transfer: a randomized controlled trial

STUDY QUESTION

Is the clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) following a frozen embryo transfer (FET) in a natural cycle (NC) higher after spontaneous ovulation than after triggered ovulation [natural cycle frozen embryo transfer (NC-FET) versus modified NC-FET]?

SUMMARY ANSWER

The CPR did not vary significantly between the two FET preparation protocols.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

Although the use of FET is continuously increasing, the most optimal endometrial preparation protocol is still under debate. For transfer in the NC specifically, conflicting results have been reported in terms of the outcome following spontaneous or triggered ovulation.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

In a tertiary hospital setting, subjects were randomized with a 1:1 allocation into two groups between January 2014 and January 2019. Patients in group A underwent an NC-FET, while in group B, a modified NC-FET was performed with a subcutaneous hCG injection to trigger ovulation. In neither group was additional luteal phase support administered. All embryos were vitrified-warmed on Day 3 and transferred on Day 4 of embryonic development. The primary outcome was CPR at 7 weeks. All patients were followed further until 10 weeks of gestation when the ongoing pregnancy rate (OPR) was defined by the observation of foetal cardiac activity on ultrasound scan. Other secondary outcomes included biochemical pregnancy rate, early pregnancy loss and the number of visits, blood samples and ultrasonographic examinations prior to FET.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

A total of 260 patients (130 per study arm) were randomized, of whom 12 withdrew consent after study arm allocation. A total of 3 women conceived spontaneously before initiating the study cycle and 16 did not start for personal or medical reasons. Of the 229 actually commencing monitoring for the study FET cycle, 7 patients needed to be switched to a hormonal replacement treatment protocol due to the absence of follicular development, 12 had no embryo available for transfer after warming and 37 had a spontaneous LH surge before the ovulation trigger could be administered, although they were allocated to group B. Given the above, an intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis was performed taking into account 248 patients (125 in group A and 123 in group B), as well as a per protocol (PP) analysis on a subset of 173 patients (110 in group A and 63 in group B).

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

Demographic features were evenly distributed between the study groups, as were the relevant fresh and frozen ET cycle characteristics. According to the ITT analysis, the CPR and OPR in group A (33.6% and 27.2%, respectively) and group B (29.3% and 24.4%, respectively) did not vary significantly [relative risk (RR) 0.87, 95% CI (0.60;1.26), P = 0.46 and RR 0.90, 95% CI (0.59;1.37), P = 0.61, respectively]. Biochemical pregnancy rate and early pregnancy loss were also found to be not statistically significantly different between the groups. In contrast, more clinic visits and blood samplings for cycle monitoring were required in the NC-FET group (4.05 ± 1.39) compared with the modified NC-FET group (3.03 ± 1.16, P = <0.001), while the number of ultrasound scans performed were comparable (1.70 ± 0.88 in group A versus 1.62 ± 1.04 in group B). The additional PP analysis was in line with the ITT results: CPR in group A was 36.4% versus 38.1% in group B [RR 1.05, 95% CI (0.70;1.56), P = 0.82].

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

The results are limited by the high drop-out rate for the PP analysis in the modified NC-FET group as more than one-third of the subjects allocated to this group ovulated spontaneously before ovulation triggering. Nonetheless, this issue is inherent to routine clinical practice and is an important observation of an event that can only be avoided by performing a very extensive monitoring that limits the practical advantages associated with modified NC-FET. Furthermore, although this is the largest randomized controlled trial (RCT) investigating this specific research question so far, a higher sample size would allow smaller differences in clinical outcome to be detected, since currently they may be left undetected.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

This RCT adds new high-quality evidence to the existing controversial literature concerning the performance of NC-FET versus modified NC-FET. Based on our results showing no statistically significant differences in clinical outcomes between the protocols, the treatment choice may be made according to the patient's and treating physician's preferences. However, the modified NC-FET strategy reduces the need for hormonal monitoring and may therefore be considered a more patient-friendly and potentially cost-effective approach.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

No specific funding was available for this study. None of the authors have a conflict of interest to declare with regard to this study.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT02145819.

TRIAL REGISTRATION DATE

8 January 2014.

DATE OF FIRST PATIENT’S ENROLMENT

21 January 2014.

Should women receive luteal support following natural cycle frozen embryo transfer? A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Spontaneous ovulation during a natural menstrual cycle is frequently used for timing frozen embryo transfer (FET). Nevertheless, it remains unclear whether or not women should receive luteal phase support (LPS) following natural cycle frozen embryo transfer (NC-FET).

OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE

The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to study whether the administration of LPS improves the reproductive outcome following NC-FET.

SEARCH METHODS

We conducted a systematic search of the literature published in Medline/PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library, from January 2000 until December 2020. We included all original English, peer-reviewed articles, irrespective of the study design. The search strategy included keywords related to NC-FET and luteal phase support. Studies reporting the results of artificial or stimulated FET cycles were excluded.

OUTCOMES

Our systematic search generated 416 records. After screening, eight studies were included in the review and seven studies were included in the meta-analysis. Two studies (n = 858) used hCG and six studies (n = 1507) used progesterone for luteal support. Four studies were randomised controlled trials (RCTs), whereas the other four were historic cohort studies. In a meta-analysis using a random effects model, hCG administration for LPS did not increase the clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) (two studies, odds ratio (OR) 0.85, 95% CI 0.64-1.14). On the other hand, progesterone LPS was associated with a higher CPR (five studies, OR 1.48, 95% CI 1.14-1.94), and a higher live birth rate (LBR) (three studies, OR 1.67, 95% CI 1.19-2.36). The association between progesterone LPS and the LBR remained significant after excluding non-randomised studies.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS

The available evidence indicates that progesterone administration for LPS is beneficial following NC-FET. There is no evidence to support the administration of hCG for LPS in these cases. Additional large RCTs are necessary to improve the quality of evidence and validate our findings.

Stimulated cycle versus artificial cycle for frozen embryo transfer in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome: a Meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Our aim is to conduct a meta-analysis comparing clinical outcomes between the mild ovarian stimulation cycle versus an artificial cycle (AC) for frozen embryo transfer (FET) in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS).

METHODS

We systematically searched the databases of PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library from inception to January 2020. The outcomes were live birth rate (LBR), ongoing pregnancy rate (OPR), clinical pregnancy rate (CPR), embryo implantation rate (IR) and miscarriage rate (MR). The mild ovarian stimulation cycle and AC were compared according to risk ratios and 95% confidence intervals using a fixed or random effects model.

RESULTS

Four retrospective studies describing the clinical outcomes were included. We found no significant difference in LBR, OPR, CPR, IR or MR between the mild ovarian stimulation cycle and AC protocols, whereas a lower MR was found for the letrozole-stimulated cycle than the AC.

CONCLUSIONS

The letrozole-stimulated cycle for endometrial preparation in PCOS patients undergoing FET may lower the MR more than the AC. PCOS patients using the mild ovarian stimulation cycle for endometrial preparation undergoing FET had similar LBR, OPR, CPR and IR compared with the AC. The letrozole-stimulated protocol may be a reasonable choice for endometrial preparation before FET for women with PCOS.

Clinical Outcomes of Frozen-Thawed Embryo Transfer in Natural Cycles with Spontaneous or Induced Ovulation: a Retrospective Cohort Study from 1937 Cycles

Our objective was to assess whether there is a difference in the pregnancy outcomes in the natural cycle (NC) with spontaneous LH rise compared with modified natural cycle controlled by hCG for final oocyte maturation and ovulation after frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET). In this retrospective cohort study, we analyzed the clinical outcomes of a total of 1937 patients undergoing FET followed by endometrial preparation with the natural cycle and modified natural cycle. The primary outcome was live birth, and secondary outcomes included miscarriage rate, clinical pregnancy rate, preterm birth rate, and ectopic pregnancy rate. The type of endometrial preparation did not impact live birth (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.92; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.69-1.23), miscarriage (aOR 0.83; 95%CI, 0.50-1.39), clinical pregnancy (aOR 0.88; 95%CI, 0.66-1.18), preterm birth (aOR 0.91; 95%CI, 0.56-1.50), or ectopic pregnancy (aOR 1.06; 95%CI, 0.29-3.94). In conclusion, in women undergoing FET, natural cycles and modified natural cycles resulted in comparable clinical outcomes.

Comparison of stimulated versus modified natural cycles for endometrial preparation prior to frozen embryo transfer: a randomized controlled trial

RESEARCH QUESTION

To compare stimulated cycle (STC) versus modified natural cycle (MNC) for endometrial preparation prior to frozen embryo transfer (FET) in terms of convenience and efficacy.

DESIGN

Prospective, open-label, randomized controlled study including 119 patients aged 20-38 years, undergoing intra-conjugal IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection, having regular cycles, at least two day 2 or day 3 frozen embryos, for whom it was the first or second FET performed, randomized to either MNC (n = 59) or STC (n = 60). Monitoring consisted of ultrasound and hormonal measurements. The number of monitoring visits required was compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

STC required a significantly lower number of monitoring visits compared with MNC (3.6 ± 0.9 versus 4.4 ± 1.1, respectively, P < 0.0001), a lower number of blood tests (2.7 ± 0.8 versus 3.5 ± 1.0, respectively, P < 0.0001) and of ultrasounds (1.2 ± 0.4 versus 1.5 ± 0.6, respectively, P = 0.0039). FET during 'non-opening' hours (22.6% versus 27.5%, respectively, P = 0.32) and cancellation rates (11.7% versus 11.9%, respectively, P = 0.97) were comparable between the STC and MNC groups. No difference concerning HCG-positive rates (34.0% versus 23.1%, respectively, P = 0.22) nor live birth rates (24.5% for STC versus 23.1% for MNC, respectively, P = 0.86) was observed. Quality of life as defined by the FertiQol score was not different (P > 0.05 for each item).

CONCLUSION

Altogether, these findings can be used for everyday clinical practice to better inform patients when deciding on the protocol to use for FET. These results suggest that MNC is a good option for patients reluctant to have injections, but requires increased monitoring. STC may offer more flexibility for patients and IVF centres.

Seven Years of Vitrified Blastocyst Transfers: Comparison of 3 Preparation Protocols at a Single ART Center

Introduction: Frozen-thawed embryo transfers (FET) have become a standard practice to increase cumulative pregnancy rates, however, the choice of the best preparation protocol remains a matter of debate. Design: Retrospective analysis of clinical pregnancy (CPR) and live birth rate (LBR) of FET in natural cycles (NC-FET), modified natural cycles with hCG-triggered ovulation (mNC-FET), and hormonal artificial replacement (AR-FET). Materials and Methods: For natural cycles, patients were monitored by ultrasound to evaluate the dominant follicle and by urinary LH kits (NC-FET). When the endometrial thickness reached at least 7 mm and the dominant follicle 16-20 mm, hCG was administered in absence of urinary LH surge (mNC-FET). Embryo thawing and transfer was planned 7 days after LH surge or hCG administration. For the AR-FET, oral estradiol valerate was administered from day 2 of menstrual cycle until endometrial thickness reached at least 7 mm and transfer was planned after 5 days of vaginal progesterone start. Only single vitrified blastocyst transfers were included. Results: In total 2,895 transfers were performed of which 561 (19.4%) carried out with NC-FET, 1,749 (60.4%) with mNC-FET and 585 (20.2%) with AR-FET. CPRs were 32.62, 43.05, and 37.26%, respectively. LBR were 24.06, 33.56, and 25.81%, respectively. A statistically significant (p < 0.001) higher LBR for mNC-FET vs. NC-FET (OR 0.49-0.78) and AR-FET (OR 0.47-0.74) was observed. A higher ectopic pregnancy rate (p = 0.002) was observed in NC-FET (3.28%) than in AR-FET (1.83%) and mNC-FET (0.40%). A higher abortion rate (p = 0.031) in pregnancies <12 weeks was observed in AR-FET (27.52%) than in NC-FET (19.67%) and in mNC-FET (19.39%). At Post hoc analysis only female age (OR 0.91-0.95), antimullerian hormone (AMH) (OR 1.01-1.07) and mNC-FET (OR 1.39-1.98) were statically significant prognostic factors for LBRs. Conclusions: These results demonstrate a superior CPR and LBR following FET in hCG-triggered ovulation cycles compared to NC and AR-FET, a higher ectopic pregnancy rate in NC-FET and a higher abortion rate in pregnancies <12 weeks in AR-FET. However, these data need to be confirmed in randomized and prospective studies before definitive conclusions can be drawn. Clinicaltrials.gov ID: NCT03581422.

Frozen embryo transfer: Endometrial preparation by letrozole versus hormone replacement cycle: A randomized clinical trial

Background

The endometrial preparation with stimulating natural cycles for frozen embryo transfer (FET) have benefits like lower cost and ease of use.

Objective

Comparing the clinical outcome of letrozole versus hormone replacement (HR) for endometrial preparation in women with normal menstrual cycles for FET in artificial reproduction techniques.

Materials and Methods

A total of 167 participants who had frozen embryos and regular ovulatory cycles were randomly divided into two groups for endometrial preparation. One group (82 women) was stimulated with letrozole 5mg/day and the other group (85 women) was hormonally stimulated by oral estradiol valerate (2 mg three times a day). All participants were followed serially by ultrasonography. Any patient who did not reach optimal endometrial thickness was excluded from the study. Implantation, biochemical and clinical pregnancy and abortion rate were reported.

Results

There was no significant difference in the mean age, duration, and primary or secondary infertility, cause of the infertility, number, and quality of transferred embryos between the groups. The mean estradiol level on the day of transfer was 643 ± 217 in the HR group and 547 ± 212 in the letrozole group (P = 0.01), which was significantly different. The clinical pregnancy rate was 38.7 in the letrozole group, higher than the HR group (25.3) but not significantly different (P = 0.06).

Conclusion

For endometrial preparation in women with a normal cycle, letrozole yields higher pregnancy rate although it is not significant; due to its cost, ease in use, and lower side effects, letrozole is a good choice.

Frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer in natural cycle increase implantation rates compared artificial cycle

Objective: To analyze global outcomes in frozen-thawed embryo transfer according to endometrial preparation with natural cycle and artificial cycle taking into account the developmental stage of the embryo.Methods: Retrospective cohort study, held in a tertiary-care university hospital with 1265 cycles for frozen-thawed embryo transfer of 860 patients, performed between January 2014 and December 2017. A total of 1097 embryo transfers were performed: 163 transfers in natural cycle (N), 531 in artificial cycle: transdermal estrogens and 403 with oral estrogens.Results: Demographical factors were similar in the three groups studied. When comparing the number of embryos transferred, the quality and the stage of embryos within the three groups there were no differences. Implantation rates were significantly higher in natural cycle. When adjusted depending on the developmental stage, blastocyst embryos transferred in natural cycle preparation had the highest implantation rate. Multiple pregnancies were also higher in natural cycle preparation. There were no significant difference between the groups in the clinical pregnancy rate, ongoing pregnancy, live birth, and miscarriages.Conclusions: Our results suggest that a natural cycle endometrial preparation assessing the disappearance of the dominant follicle by ultrasound increases implantation rates, especially when transferring blastocysts.

Modified natural-cycle cryopreserved embryo transfer: is a washout period needed after a failed fresh cycle?

RESEARCH QUESTION

Are the characteristics of the natural cycle or modified natural cycle (mNC), or live birth rates (LBR), affected by delaying frozen embryo transfer (FET) after a failed fresh IVF cycle?

DESIGN

In a retrospective study, conducted at a university-affiliated tertiary centre, 198 women aged 18-45 years undergoing their first FET cycle after a failed fresh embryo transfer attempt using an mNC were evaluated. Cycles were divided according to the time interval between oocyte retrieval and the start of the FET cycle into the immediate FET group (<22 days) and the delayed FET group (≥22 days). The main outcome measures were ovulation day and LBR.

RESULTS

The mean interval between oocyte retrieval and the start of the FET cycle was 15.6 ± 3.2 days in the immediate FET group and 84.8 ± 73.7 days in the delayed FET group (P < 0.001). Ovulation day was significantly delayed in the immediate FET group (day 17.1 ± 4.4 versus day 15.4 ± 3.7; P = 0.004). There was no difference between the immediate and delayed FET groups in terms of clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) (25.4% and 25.0%, respectively) or LBR (21.2% and 20.0%, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Natural-cycle characteristics are similar in immediate and delayed cycles, except for a slight delay in ovulation day. Deferring mNC-FET after a failed fresh IVF cycle does not improve the reproductive outcome. These results should encourage patients and clinicians who want to proceed with FET immediately after failure of fresh IVF.

A Comparison of the Miscarriage and Live Birth Rate for Frozen Embryo Transfer According to Two Endometrial Preparations: Natural or Primed with Estrogens

Objective The primary objective is to compare miscarriage rates in frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) cycles, according to the endometrial preparation used either artificial through the administration of exogenous estrogen and progesterone or natural without any treatment, during a spontaneous ovulatory cycle. The secondary objective is to compare the live birth rates between the two endometrial preparations.

Study design This is a retrospective study done at KK Women’s and Children’s Hospital Singapore. We included women who underwent FET cycles either with hormone replacement treatment (HRT) or no treatment (natural) for the endometrial preparation, regardless of their cycle number, from 1 January 2011 till 31 December 2015.

Results A total of 2,752 FET cycles were included in our analysis. The natural cycle followed by vaginal progesterone support was used in 1,221 cycles and the HRT cycle with estrogen and vaginal progesterone was used in 1,531 cycles. There is a significantly higher miscarriage rate in the HRT group (38.4%) compared with the natural group (22.3%). The live birth rate is significantly higher in the natural group (22.8%) compared with the HRT group (17.3%). The multivariate analysis further shows that the HRT therapy is independently associated with an increased risk of miscarriage (adjusted odds ratio 2.05; 95% confidence interval 1.45–2.90; [Formula: see text] <0.001) and hence lower odds of live birth (adjusted odds ratio 0.69; 95% confidence interval 0.56–0.84; [Formula: see text] <0.001) after adjusting for the patient’s age at which the embryo was cryopreserved, race, body mass index, main indications for in vitro fertilization, number of embryos transferred and type of embryo transferred.

Conclusion We have shown in this study that the miscarriage rate is higher in the HRT FET group and that this increased miscarriage rate translates into a lower live birth rate in the HRT group. Thus, we conclude that patients with regular menstrual cycles should be offered a natural FET cycle to achieve better outcomes in terms of live birth rate and reducing the miscarriage rate.

Modified hMG stimulated: an effective option in endometrial preparation for frozen-thawed embryo transfer in patients with normal menstrual cycles

To evaluate the clinical efficacy of modified human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG) stimulated, hormone replacement therapy (HRT), natural cycling and letrozole ovulation induction during endometrial preparation for frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) in patients with normal menstrual cycles. This retrospective analysis included a total of 5070 cycles of patients with normal menstrual patterns who underwent FET between October 2009 and September 2015. The patients were divided into four groups according to the method of endometrial preparation for FET: 1838 cycles were natural, 1666 underwent HRT, 340 underwent letrozole ovulation induction and 1226 underwent modified hMG stimulated. Reproduction-related clinical outcomes in the four groups were compared. The clinical pregnancy rates and live birth rates of patients in the modified hMG stimulated group were significantly higher than that in the other groups p < .05. While abortion rates were not significantly different among all four groups (all p >.05). Modified hMG stimulated resulted in a higher pregnancy rate compared to the other treatment groups. Therefore, modified hMG stimulated may be an effective option in endometrial preparation for FET in patients with normal menstrual cycles.

[Natural cycle for frozen-thawed embryo transfer: Spontaneous ovulation or triggering by HCG]

OBJECTIVE

To compare frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) outcomes in natural cycles according to ovulation induction: spontaneous versus recombinant human chorionic gonadotrophin (r-hCG) triggering.

METHODS

This retrospective study included all patients monitored for natural cycle FET during one year. When serial monitoring were performed until spontaneous LH rise, patients were included in group A (n=38) whereas those receiving r-hCG for ovulation triggering formed group B (n=43). All embryos had been cryopreserved by a vitrification method following a previous IVF cycle. No luteal phase support had been given. We compared outcomes between the 2 groups.

RESULTS

After checking groups comparability, we didn't find significant difference for the implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate and live birth (31% vs 45%, 32% vs 51% et 21% vs 32%, respectively for group A and B). The number of monitoring was significantly lower in group B (1,9±0,8 versus 2,5±1, P=0,006).

DISCUSSION

Although no consensus has been yet established, natural cycle seems indicated for normo-ovulating patients but the question of ovulation induction is still debated. In our study, triggering ovulation by r-hCG, respecting strict criteria, seems provide good results while reducing both protocol's constraints and cost.

Human chorionic gonadotropin-administered natural cycle versus spontaneous ovulatory cycle in patients undergoing two pronuclear zygote frozen-thawed embryo transfer

Objective

To compare human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG)-administered natural cycle with spontaneous ovulatory cycle in patients undergoing frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FTET) in natural cycles.

Methods

In this retrospective cohort study, we analyzed the clinical outcome of a total of 166 consecutive FTET cycles that were performed in either natural cycle controlled by HCG for ovulation triggering (HCG group, n=110) or natural cycle with spontaneous ovulation (control group, n=56) in 166 infertile patients between January 2009 and November 2013.

Results

There were no differences in patients' characteristics between the 2 groups. The numbers of oocytes retrieved, mature oocytes, fertilized oocytes, grade I or II embryos and frozen embryos in the previous in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycle in which embryos were frozen were comparable between the HCG and control groups. Significant differences were not also observed between the 2 groups in clinical pregnancy rate (CPR), embryo implantation rate, miscarriage rate, live birth rate and multiple CPR. However, the number of hospital visits for follicular monitoring was significantly fewer in the HCG group than in the control group (P<0.001).

Conclusion

Our results demonstrated that HCG administration for ovulation triggering in natural cycle reduces the number of hospital visits for follicular monitoring without any detrimental effect on FTET outcome when compared with spontaneous ovulatory cycles in infertile patients undergoing FTET in natural ovulatory cycles.

HCG administration after endogenous LH rise negatively influences pregnancy rate in modified natural cycle for frozen-thawed euploid blastocyst transfer: a pilot study

PURPOSE

The aim of the present study was to evaluate whether in a modified natural cycle (modified-NC) for a frozen-thawed single euploid blastocyst transfer, a critical LH value, above which human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) administration should be avoided, may be defined.

METHODS

One hundred and sixty-seven patients underwent modified natural cycle in order to transfer a single frozen-thawed euploid blastocyst. All embryos were obtained by intracytoplasmic sperm injection and were biopsied at the blastocyst stage and analyzed by means of array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH). Ovulation was induced using 10.000 IU hCG when the mean follicle diameter was at least of 17 mm, independently from LH values. The primary end points were the hCG-positive test and clinical pregnancy. The interim analysis showed that LH value ≥ 13 mIU/ml on the day of hCG injection may negatively influence the clinical results, suggesting that in this condition, it should be advisable waiting for spontaneous ovulation.

RESULTS

Among patients who received hCG for ovulation induction, the hCG-positive test and clinical pregnancy rates in modified-NC were significantly lower in cycles with LH ≥ 13 mIU/ml in respect to those with LH < 13 mIU/ml (45.4 vs 73.3 and 36.4 vs 65.9%, in LH ≥ 13 and LH < 13 groups, respectively). In patients with LH value ≥ 13 mIU/ml, hCG administration led to significantly lower rates of hCG-positive test (45.4 vs 74.5% in hCG administration and spontaneous ovulation groups, respectively) and clinical pregnancy (36.4 vs 64.7% in hCG administration and spontaneous ovulation groups, respectively). The baseline patient characteristics were comparable in all groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of this study highlight that LH elevation ≥ 13 mIU/ml prior to hCG administration may negatively affect clinical pregnancy rates in modified-NC for single euploid blastocyst transfer. The LH determination should be routinely performed during follicular monitoring. In the presence of LH level ≥ 13 mIU/ml, hCG administration should be avoided, and the embryo transfer should be planned only after spontaneous follicular rupture.

Frozen embryo transfer: a review on the optimal endometrial preparation and timing

STUDY QUESTION

What is the optimal endometrial preparation protocol for a frozen embryo transfer (FET)?

SUMMARY ANSWER

Although the optimal endometrial preparation protocol for FET needs further research and is yet to be determined, we propose a standardized timing strategy based on the current available evidence which could assist in the harmonization and comparability of clinic practice and future trials.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

Amid a continuous increase in the number of FET cycles, determining the optimal endometrial preparation protocol has become paramount to maximize ART success. In current daily practice, different FET preparation methods and timing strategies are used.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

This is a review of the current literature on FET preparation methods, with special attention to the timing of the embryo transfer.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

Literature on the topic was retrieved in PubMed and references from relevant articles were investigated until June 2017.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

The number of high quality randomized controlled trials (RCTs) is scarce and, hence, the evidence for the best protocol for FET is poor. Future research should compare both the pregnancy and neonatal outcomes between HRT and true natural cycle (NC) FET. In terms of embryo transfer timing, we propose to start progesterone intake on the theoretical day of oocyte retrieval in HRT and to perform blastocyst transfer at hCG + 7 or LH + 6 in modified or true NC, respectively.

LIMITATIONS REASONS FOR CAUTION

As only a few high quality RCTs on the optimal preparation for FET are available in the existing literature, no definitive conclusion for benefit of one protocol over the other can be drawn so far.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

Caution when using HRT for FET is warranted since the rate of early pregnancy loss is alarmingly high in some reports.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

S.M. is funded by the Research Fund of Flanders (FWO). H.T. and C.B. report grants from Merck, Goodlife, Besins and Abbott during the conduct of the study.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

Not applicable.

Interval between IVF stimulation cycle and frozen embryo transfer: Is there a benefit to a delay between cycles?

BACKGROUND

There is currently limited evidence available regarding ideal timing for frozen embryo transfer (FET). Demonstrating that delaying FETs has few clinical benefits would allow patients to proceed with FET at their earliest convenience.

AIMS

To examine whether the time interval between stimulation cycle and subsequent FET affects pregnancy and live birth rates.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective cohort study, based in a multi-site private in vitro fertilisation (IVF) clinic categorised women into two groups: those having FET cycles administered within 25-35 days or 50-70 days of IVF stimulation cycle and embryo freeze. Outcomes measured were clinical pregnancy and live birth rates.

RESULTS

When comparing the patients who have had a 25-35 days gap between embryo freeze and FET, to the matched patients who had a 50-70 days gap, the statistically significant results showed an adjusted odds ratio for live birth of 1.31 (1.02-1.67). The adjusted odds ratio for clinical pregnancy in matched case : control analysis was not statistically significant at 1.22 (0.97-1.53).

CONCLUSION

A gap of 25-35 days between embryo freeze and FET was associated with improved live birth rates compared to a gap of 50-70 days.

Impact of Endometrial Preparation Protocols for Frozen Embryo Transfer on Live Birth Rates

BACKGROUND

It has been reported that a natural cycle (NC) is similar to or even better than hormone replacement therapy (HRT) in patients with regular cycles who undergo frozen embryo transfer (FET). Hundreds of FETs are managed yearly in our clinic. Scheduling these cycles is critical in a busy unit like ours. This is why we have to prove if a NC really shows a better outcome than other endometrium preparation protocols.

METHODS

Hence we carried out a prospective study between June 2011 and June 2012, which included 530 patients (570 FET cycles) randomly allocated to two study groups: Group 1 (n=280 cycles), artificial cycle (HRT); or group 2 (n=290 cycles), natural cycle. Natural cycles were later divided into two groups: 169 patients scheduled with human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) and 121 with endogenous luteinizing hormone (LH) surge. The inclusion criteria were: age <39 years, regular menstrual cycles (26-35 days), and previous IVF cycle with embryo cryopreservation. The exclusion criteria were polycystic ovarian syndrome and endometriosis stage III/IV.

RESULTS

No statistical differences were found in the baseline characteristics among groups, nor between implantation or ongoing pregnancy rates (30.8% HRT group; 32.7% hCG group; 34.5% LH surge group). However, a higher miscarriage rate was observed in the HRT group when compared to hCG or LH surge (21.2% versus 12.9% versus 11.1%, P<0.01). Live birth rates were similar among groups, as were perinatal outcomes, for rates of natural delivery and weight and length of newborns.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that scheduling FET with HRT on weekdays and avoiding work overload at weekends prove efficient and safe in cycle outcome terms. Another reason for the convenience of an HRT protocol is having fewer visits to the clinic compared to natural cycle protocols.

Methods for endometrial preparation in frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles

Frozen-thawed (FT) embryo transfer is a procedure used for the storage and transfer of excess embryos obtained during in vitro fertilization- intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles. In recent years, improvements in laboratory conditions and limitations on the number of embryos to be transferred have led to a progressive increase in FT embryo transfer cycles. However, the best solution for endometrial preparation in these cycles is still a matter of debate. In this study, we aimed to review the current methods of endometrial preparation in FT embryo transfer cycles. In light of the current literature, it is hard to determine which method is the best for endometrial preparation. It is therefore necessary to conduct randomized controlled studies in a prospective design, which will also evaluate the above-mentioned factors.

Preparation of endometrium for frozen embryo replacement cycles: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the best protocol to prepare endometrium for frozen embryo replacement (FER) cycles.

METHODS

This study is a systematic review and meta-analysis. Following PubMed and OvidSP search, a total of 1166 studies published after 1990 were identified following removal of duplicates. Following exclusion of studies not matching our inclusion criteria, a total of 33 studies were analyzed. Primary outcome measure was live birth. The following protocols, including true natural cycle (tNC), modified natural cycle (mNC), artificial cycle (AC) with or without suppression, and mild ovarian stimulation (OS) with gonadotropin (Gn) or aromatase inhibitor (AI), were compared.

RESULTS

No statistically significant difference for both clinical pregnancy and live birth was noted between tNC and mNC groups. When tNC and AC without suppression groups are compared, there was a statistically significant difference in clinical pregnancy rate in favor of tNC, whereas it failed to reach statistical significance for live birth. When tNC and AC with suppression groups are compared, there was a statistically significant difference in live birth rate favoring the latter. Similar pregnancy outcome was noted among mNC versus AC with or without suppression groups. Similarly, no difference in clinical pregnancy and live birth was noted when ACs with or without suppression groups are compared.

CONCLUSIONS

There is no consistent superiority of any endometrial preparation for FER. However, mNC has several advantages (being patient-friendly; yielding at least equivalent or better pregnancy rates when compared with tNC and AC with or without suppression; may not require LPS). Mild OS with Gn or AI may be promising.

Frozen blastocyst embryo transfer using a supplemented natural cycle protocol has a similar live birth rate compared to a programmed cycle protocol

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to compare outcomes for a supplemented natural cycle with a programmed cycle protocol for frozen blastocyst transfer.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed of frozen autologous blastocyst transfers, at a single academic fertility center (519 supplemented natural cycles and 106 programmed cycles). Implantation, clinical pregnancy, miscarriage, and live birth and birth weight were compared using Pearson's Chi-squared test, T-test, or Fisher's exact test.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference between natural and programmed frozen embryo transfers with respect to implantation (21.9 vs. 18.1 %), clinical pregnancy (35.5 vs. 29.2 %), and live birth rates (27.7 vs. 23.6 %). Mean birth weights were also similar between natural and programmed cycles for singletons (3354 vs. 3340 g) and twins (2422 vs. 2294 g)

CONCLUSION

Frozen blastocyst embryo transfers using supplemented natural or programmed protocols experience similar success rates. Patient preference should be considered in choosing a protocol.

Natural cycle is superior to hormone replacement therapy cycle for vitrificated-preserved frozen-thawed embryo transfer

We undertook this retrospective variables-control analysis to compare the reproductive outcomes of frozen-thawed embryo transfer using endometrial preparation with either natural cycle or hormone replacement therapy cycle. Patients were divided into three subgroups. Subgroup A (n = 32) consisted of patients having three 8-cell post-thawed embryos transferred. Subgroup B (n = 404) consisted of patients having three good quality post-thawed embryos transferred. Subgroup C (n = 578) consisted of patients having two or three all intact and mitosis resumption post-thawed embryos transferred. Implantation rate, biochemical pregnancy rate, and clinical pregnancy rate were measured. In subgroup A, significantly higher implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate ongoing pregnancy rate, and lower biochemical pregnancy rate were observed in the natural cycle compared with hormone replacement therapy (HRT) cycle. Subgroup B, had a significantly higher rate of implantation, ongoing pregnancy, and a significantly lower rate of biochemical pregnancy in natural cycle compared with HRT cycle. The natural cycle had a higher trend of clinical pregnancy rate without reaching statistical significance. No statistical difference in reproductive outcomes between natural cycle and HRT cycle was observed in subgroup C. The results suggest the superiority of the natural cycle as compared with the HRT cycle under certain circumstances in a selected population of patients.

[Frozen embryo transfer protocol: does spontaneous cycle give good results?]

OBJECTIVE

Frozen embryos' transfer optimize the pregnancy rates per retrieval. In France, 60% of transfer cycles occur in stimulated cycles. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of frozen embryo transfers in spontaneous, substituted and stimulated cycle.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This retrospective study includes patients who are 18-43 years old and had a frozen embryo transfer between 1st January 2008 and 31st December 2008. Three transfer protocols have been used: the spontaneous cycle (group 1), substituted cycle (group 2), and stimulated cycle (group 3). The characteristics of couples, embryonic parameters and data transfer cycles, and their outcomes were evaluated.

RESULT(S)

Among the 333 patients, 132 were included in the first group, 24 in the second group and 177 in the third group. After checking the homogeneity of the three groups, we found pregnancy rates (respectively 20.49 vs 13.04% and 11.32%, P=0.0348), and deliveries (respectively 13.93 vs 8,7 and 6.29%, P=0.0314), significantly higher in spontaneous cycles.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

Currently there is no consensus on the best technique for endometrial preparation for frozen embryo transfer. Our results support transfers in spontaneous cycle for normo-ovulating patients. Natural cycles can achieve good pregnancy rates while minimizing the costs and side effects.

Spontaneous ovulation versus HCG triggering for timing natural-cycle frozen-thawed embryo transfer: a randomized study

In ovulatory patients, frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) is commonly performed during a natural cycle (NC). The objective was to compare serial monitoring until documentation of ovulation with human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) triggering, for timing NC-FET. Sixty women with regular menstrual cycles undergoing NC-FET were randomized into two groups: group A (n=30) had FET in a natural cycle after ovulation triggering with HCG; group B (n=30) had FET in a natural cycle after detection of spontaneous ovulation. The main outcome measure was the number of monitoring visits at the clinic per cycle. Secondary outcome measures included implantation rate, clinical pregnancy and live-birth rates. Both groups were similar in terms of demographic characteristics and reproductive history. Clinical and laboratory characteristics of fresh and frozen cycles and pregnancy and delivery rates were comparable for both groups. The number of monitoring visits in group A (3.2 ± 1.4) was significantly lower than in group B (4.7 ± 1.6) (P=0.002). In patients undergoing NC-FET, triggering ovulation by HCG can significantly reduce the number of visits necessary for cycle monitoring without an adverse effect on cycle outcome. Ovulation triggering can increase both patient convenience and cycle cost effectiveness.

Use of the natural cycle and vitrification thawed blastocyst transfer results in better in-vitro fertilization outcomes : cycle regimens of vitrification thawed blastocyst transfer

PURPOSE

To compare the IVF outcomes of vitrification-thawed blastocyst transfer cycles utilizing different endometrial preparation methods.

METHODS

We retrospectively assessed IVF outcomes in 611 patients (648 cycles) who underwent blastocyst frozen embryo transfer (FET) between January 2007 and December 2009. All embryos had been cryopreserved by a vitrification method following a previous IVF cycle. Patients were prepared for transfer by using either the natural cycle (n = 310/Group 1), the natural cycle with ovulation induction employing human chorionic gonadotropin (n = 134/Group 2), or a hormonally manipulated artificial cycle with estrogen and progesterone supplementation (n = 204/Group 3).

RESULTS

Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed a significant difference in clinical pregnancy rate between Groups 3 (30.4%) and 1 (41.9%) (odds ratio [OR], 0.567; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.379-0.847, P = 0.006) whereas the difference between Groups 2 and 1 was not significant (41.8% vs. 41.9%; OR, 0.683; 95% CI, 0.435-1.073; P = 0.098). Other significant variables affecting clinical pregnancy rate were the number of embryos transferred, the grade of transferred embryos, and maximal endometrial thickness.

CONCLUSION

The results showed that, using vitrification-thawed blastocyst transfer, employment of natural cycles with or without hCG treatment was associated with better outcomes than was the use of hormonally manipulated cycles.

Transfer of cryopreserved - thawed embryos in hCG induced natural or clomiphene citrate cycles yields similar live birth rates in normo-ovulatory women

INTRODUCTION

the purpose of this retrospective analysis is to compare the efficiency of hCG-induced natural and Clomiphene citrate (CC) cycles in normovulatory patients undergoing frozen embryo transfer (FET).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

it was retrospectively conducted in the Dutchspeaking Free University of Brussels and covered the period from April 2003 to August 2006. In particular, 428 day-three FET cycles belonging to the two comparative groups were recruited. Of these FET cycles, 261 were hCG-induced natural and 167 clomiphene citrate-induced cycles.

RESULTS

no statistically significant difference was observed in live birth rate between CC and natural group (22.2% versus 22.6%), respectively (P = 0.708). Except for the number of embryos transferred (1.72 ± 0.46 for cc group versus 1.63 ± 0.48 for natural group, p = 0.045), no other parameters seem to influence the outcome. discussion: To our knowledge, this is the first attempt to investigate which of the above mentioned regimens is optimal for normo-ovulatory women in FET cycles. A similar delivery outcome was observed for hCG-induced natural and CC-induced cycles used for endometrial preparation in FET.