Effect of endometrioma cystectomy on IVF outcome: a prospective randomized study

Impact of Endometriosis Surgery on In Vitro Fertilization/Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection Outcomes: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Endometriosis-related infertility remains a therapeutic challenge. A burning issue in this field of research is determining whether pre-assisted reproductive technology (ART) surgery may be of some benefit in terms of reproductive outcomes. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed at comparing ongoing pregnancy rates (OPR) and/or live birth rates (LBR) in patients who underwent endometriosis surgery before ART (IVF/ICSI) in comparison with patients who underwent first-line ART (IVF/ICSI). Searches were conducted from January 1990 to June 2021 on PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library using the following search terms: endometriosis, surgery, reproductive outcomes, and IVF/ICSI. The primary outcomes were OPR or LBR. A total of 19 studies were included in the meta-analysis. No statistically significant differences in LBR [0.91[0.63, 1.30]; I2 = 66%; n = 11], OPR [1.28[0.66, 2.49]; I2 = 60%; n = 3], and early pregnancy loss rate [0.88[0.62, 1.25]; I2 = 0%; n = 7] per cycle were found when comparing patients who underwent endometriosis surgery before IVF/ICSI and those who did not. After the exclusion of the studies with high risks of bias, the LBR per cycle was significantly reduced in the case of surgical treatment before IVF/ICSI [0.53[0.33, 0.86]; I2 = 30%; n = 4]. These data urge the clinician to carefully weigh the pros and cons before referring infertile patients with endometriosis to surgery before IVF, highlighting the key role of multidisciplinary referral centers.

Cumulative pregnancy rate via multiple fresh or frozen embryo transfers in women with current, resected, or recurred endometrioma

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to retrospectively analyze the cumulative pregnancy rate (PR) via multiple fresh or frozen embryo transfers (ET) in women with current, resected, or recurred endometrioma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The IVF data including oocyte pick-up (OPU) and fresh or frozen ET in women with current (37 women; 56 OPU, 18 fresh and 14 frozen ET), resected (24 women; 50 OPU, 17 fresh and 42 frozen ET), or recurred endometrioma (28 women; 49 OPU, 22 fresh and 24 frozen ET) were obtained. All cycles were performed from 2015 to 2022 in a single university hospital.

RESULTS

The median serum AMH level (ng/mL) was 1.44, 1.47, and 0.98, respectively. The number of total or mature oocytes, fertilized oocytes, cleavage embryos at day-3, and top-quality embryos at day-3 were all similar in the three groups. Cycles with no oocyte occurred in 2 (3.6%), 1 (2%), and 3 cycles (6.1%), respectively. Freeze-all was performed in 46.3%, 59.2%, and 47.8% of the cycles, respectively (p > 0.05). The cumulative clinical PR per total ET (43.8%, 25.4%, and 21.7%), per OPU (25%, 30%, and 20.4%), and per woman (37.8%, 62.5%, and 35.7%) were all similar in the three groups. The cumulative ongoing pregnancy and live birth rate per total ET, per OPU, and per woman were also similar in the three groups.

CONCLUSION

Similarity in ovarian reserve, number of oocytes, number of embryos, cumulative clinical PR, and live birth in the three endometriosis groups indicates that the IVF outcomes in the 'recurrent endometrioma' group are not inferior to 'current' or 'resected' group.

Development and validation of a conventional in vitro total fertilization failure prediction model

BACKGROUND

Conventional total fertilization failure (TFF) is a challenging problem for clinicians. The predictive model developed in this study aims to predict the individual probability of conventional in vitro total fertilization failure.

METHODS

The prediction model was developed based on 1635 patients who underwent first-attempt in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles from January 2018 to January 2020. Total fertilization failure and normal fertilization occurred in 218 and 1417 cycles, respectively. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to develop the prediction model. Performance of our model was evaluated using calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow test) and discrimination (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC]).

RESULTS

Thirteen risk factors for TFF were included in the prediction model, as follows: female age; female body mass index; infertility duration; number of oocytes retrieved; stimulation protocol; infertility etiology; infertility diagnosis; male age; sperm concentration; total sperm motility; normal sperm morphology percentage; swim-up sperm motility; and swim-up sperm concentration. The AUC of our model was 0.815 (95% CI: 0.783-0.846), indicating satisfactory discrimination performance.

CONCLUSION

Considering female and male factors (especially sperm parameters), we established a model that predicts the probability of TFF in conventional IVF procedures that will be helpful in the laboratory supporting IVF to facilitate physicians in determining optimal treatment.

The Impact of Endometrioma on Embryo Quality in In Vitro Fertilization: A Retrospective Cohort Study

The influence of endometrioma on oocyte and embryo competence is inconclusive. Furthermore, the benefits of surgical treatment remain uncertain. This study aimed to investigate the effect of endometrioma on oocyte and embryo quality from a morphological perspective and further explore whether surgery could contribute to improving oocyte and embryo competence. A total of 664 IVF cycles with endometrioma (538 cycles underwent surgeries) and 3133 IVF cycles from the control group were included. The propensity score matching was used to balance the baseline differences between groups. There was a lower MII oocyte rate (85.0% versus 87.8%, p < 0.001; 84.9% versus 87.6%, p = 0.001) and a similar good-quality embryos rate in women with endometrioma (and those who underwent surgeries) compared with control group. For women with endometrioma, the rates of blastocyst development (67.1% versus 60.2%; p = 0.013) and good blastocyst development (40.7% versus 35.2%; p = 0.049) were significantly higher in those who had undergone surgical treatment compared with those who had not, but the rates of MII oocytes (79.9% versus 87.7%; p < 0.001) and normal fertilization (55.2% versus 66.2%; p < 0.001) were lower. The study indicates that endometrioma, including its surgical treatment, compromises the oocyte maturity not the embryo quality at the cleavage stage; however, the surgery seems to contribute to improving blastocyst development.

Impacts of endometrioma on ovarian aging from basic science to clinical management

Endometriosis is a common reproductive disorder characterized by the presence of endometrial implants outside of the uterus. It affects ~1 in 10 women of reproductive age. Endometriosis in the ovary, also known as endometrioma (OMA), is the most frequent implantation site and the leading cause of reproductive failure in affected women. Ovarian aging is one of the characteristic features of OMA, however its underlying mechanism yet to be determined. Accumulated evidence has shown that pelvic and local microenvironments in women with OMA are manifested, causing detrimental effects on ovarian development and functions. Whilst clinical associations of OMA with poor ovarian reserve, premature ovarian insufficiency, and early menopause have been reported. Moreover, surgical ablation, fenestration, and cystectomy of OMA can further damage the normal ovarian reservoir, and trigger hyperactivation of primordial follicles, subsequently resulting in the undesired deterioration of ovarian functions. Nevertheless, there is no effective treatment to delay or restore ovarian aging. This review comprehensively summarised the pathogenesis and study hypothesis of ovarian aging caused by OMA in order to propose potential therapeutic targets and interventions for future studies.

Impact of cystectomy versus ablation for endometrioma on ovarian reserve: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether cystectomy or ablation for endometrioma has less impact on ovarian reserve as evaluated by antral follicle count (AFC) and antimüllerian hormone (AMH) levels.

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

SETTING

Not applicable.

PATIENT(S)

Patients with endometriomas undergoing cystectomy or ablation.

INTERVENTION(S)

All prospective studies comparing cystectomy with ablation for endometrioma in the PubMed, EMBASE, MEDLINE and Web of Science until April 3, 2022 were retrieved and reviewed. Medical treatment used as adjuvant therapy for the surgery was excluded. Two authors assessed eligibility and risk of bias independently. The statistical data were pooled using the Review Manager software.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

The changes of AMH levels and AFC values in cystectomy group and ablation group, including intergroup comparisons and intragroup comparisons.

RESULT(S)

Four randomized clinical trials and 2 prospective cohort studies were eligible for the meta-analysis, with a total of 294 patients. In the intergroup comparisons, preoperative AFC values were similar with low heterogeneity, but postoperative AFC values were significantly lower in cystectomy than ablation (mean differences [MD], -1.33; 95% credible interval, -2.15 to -0.51; I² = 57%). In the intragroup comparisons of AFC values, sensitivity analyses showed a significant decrease in cystectomy (MD, -1.93; 95% credible interval, -2.40 to -1.45; I² = 0%) at 6-month follow-up, compared with no reduction in ablation. The intragroup comparisons of AMH levels supported negative effects on ovarian reserve of both cystectomy (MD, -1.26; 95% credible interval, -1.64 to -0.88; I² = 45%) and ablation (MD, -0.70; 95% credible interval, -1.07 to -0.32; I² = 0%).

CONCLUSION(S)

Both ablation and cystectomy have significantly detrimental effects on ovarian reserve as evaluated by AMH, but the ablation causes relatively less damage to ovarian reserve as appraised by AFC.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42020152823;PROSPERO (york.ac.uk).

Endometrioma and assisted reproductive technology: a review

PURPOSE

Endometriomas are a common cause of infertility necessitating assisted reproductive technology (ART). It had been previously thought that surgical removal of the endometriomas prior to ART would improve reproductive outcomes, but recent data suggests that surgical cystectomy might affect the ovarian reserve, decreasing the chances of ART success. The aim of this article is to review the literature on the effects of endometrioma surgery on ART outcomes providing an overview of the current evidence and assessing the need for further studies.

METHODS

A literature search was performed using PubMed and MEDLINE databases to identify studies that discuss endometriomas and assisted reproductive technology before versus after surgery.

RESULTS

In women with an endometrioma requiring ART, growing evidence suggests that surgery might result in damage to the ovarian reserve and further decrease chances of fertility. However, pregnancy rates, implantation rates, fertilization rates, and live birth rates seemed to be consistently similar across both groups.

CONCLUSION

The current evidence is inconclusive on whether endometriomas should be surgically removed prior to ART. Further large randomized controlled trials are needed for a definite answer, and until then, management should be individualized.

Assisted reproductive treatment outcomes of women with endometriomas: Either with or without previous ovarian surgery

OBJECTIVE

The present study aimed to evaluate and compare the assisted reproductive technique (ART) outcomes of women with endometriomas either with or without prior endometrioma surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 122 women with endometriomas underwent intracytoplasmic sperm injection-embryo transfer (ICSI-ET) at a tertiary IVF Center, between 2014 and 2019, were included in this retrospective study. Of this group, 38 patients had recurrent endometriomas and 84 patients had primary endometrioma without a previous endometrioma surgery. The outcomes of ART treatment including cancellation rates before ET, numbers of oocytes obtained, implantation, clinical pregnancy and live birth rates were compared between the groups. A logistic regression model including potential confounders as age and presence of male factor infertility was used to evaluate the possible effect of recurrent endometriomas on the live birth.

RESULTS

The baseline characteristics of the groups were similar. The poor ovarian response rate, defined as the harvest of fewer than four oocytes, was identified in 35.7% and 42.1% of primary and recurrent endometrioma groups, respectively. The implantation (27.2 ± 42.7% vs 24.1 ± 41.4%, P = .74), clinical pregnancy/ET (30.9% vs 27.6%, P = .93 ) and live birth rates/ET (22.1% vs 17.2%, P = .79) CONCLUSION: The ART outcomes of patients with primary and recurrent endometriomas do not seem different in terms of response to ovarian stimulation and live birth rates after ICSI. These results may indicate that the recurrence of the endometrioma might not have a further detrimental effect on ART outcome than the disease itself.

Effects of ovarian endometrioma aspiration on in vitro fertilization-intracytoplasmic sperm injection and embryo transfer outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effect of ovarian endometrioma aspiration on IVF/ICSI outcomes.

METHODS

The PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Wanfang databases were searched to identify studies related to the treatment of endometrioma up to October 1, 2020, and the data of 1207 patients from 10 studies were analyzed using STATA.

RESULTS

The 10 studies in our analysis included 7 comparing aspiration and surgery and 6 comparing aspiration with no intervention. In the aspiration versus surgery groups, live birth rate [OR 0.97 (95% CI 0.51, 1.85), P = 0.925] and clinical pregnancy rate [OR 1.30 (95% CI 0.95, 1.80), P = 0.105] showed no significant difference between the two groups. Abortion rate [OR 4.26 (95% CI 1.38, 13.08), P = 0.011], the number of oocytes retrieved [mean difference 1.95 (95% CI 0.10, 3.81), P = 0.039], and the estradiol peak on hCG day [mean difference 392.16 (95% CI 230.14, 554.18), P < 0.001] were significantly higher in the aspiration group compared to the surgical group. In the aspiration versus the no intervention group, live birth rate [OR 0.84 (95% CI 0.45, 1.59), P = 0.602] and clinical pregnancy rate [OR 1.25 (95% CI 0.88, 1.77), P = 0.206] were not significantly different between the two groups. The abortion rate [OR 0.31 (95% CI 0.11, 0.88), P = 0.028] and the number of gonadotropin ampoules [mean difference - 3.13 ampoules (95% CI - 4.90, - 1.37), P < 0.001] were significantly lower in the aspiration group compared to the no intervention group.

CONCLUSION

Compared with surgical treatment or no intervention treatment, aspiration has less effect on ovarian response, ovarian reserve, and pregnancy outcomes.

Endometrioma and reproductive issues: a well-informed patient may be the driver for change

Endometriosis affects a great proportion of women during their reproductive years and may impair female fertility in several ways. Ovarian endometrioma (OE) is the most frequent phenotype and growing evidence suggest an endometrioma-mediated damage to the ovary, ovarian reserve and oocyte quality. Traditionally, surgery has been the first-line treatment in cases of OE. Great advances in assisted reproduction and fertility preservation techniques opened new possibilities towards a more conservative approach. Herein we discuss multiple mechanisms responsible for the deterioration of the reproductive capacity in cases of OE as well as the pros and cons of different treatment options. The management of endometrioma-related subfertility remains controversial and it will depend on patient's intentions and priorities. In the "internet era" patients tend to be hyper-informed and more participative, but they are often misguided and misinformed. Thus, doctors should be able to convert these individuals into well-informed patients in order to facilitate the process of shared decision making, which is extremely relevant in the context of OEs.

Surgery for women with endometrioma prior to in vitro fertilisation: proposal for a feasible multicentre randomised clinical trial in the UK

STUDY QUESTION

Is it feasible to undertake a randomised controlled trial to establish whether surgical removal of endometrioma or not, improves live birth rates from IVF?

SUMMARY ANSWER

A randomised controlled trial (RCT) comparing surgery versus no surgery to endometrioma prior to IVF is only feasible in UK if an adaptive rather than traditional study design is used; this would minimise resource wastage and complete the trial in an acceptable time frame.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

There is wide variation in the management of endometriomas prior to IVF, with decisions about treatment being influenced by personal preferences.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, AND DURATION

This was a mixed-methods study consisting of an online survey of clinicians, a focus group and individual interviews with potential trial participants.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

Endometriosis and fertility experts across the UK were invited to participate in an online anonymised questionnaire. Potential future trial participants were recruited from a tertiary care fertility centre and invited to participate in either individual interviews or focus groups.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

Clinicians and potential trial participants confirmed the need for an RCT to inform the management of an endometrioma prior to IVF. There were 126 clinicians who completed the survey, and the majority (70%) were willing to recruit to a trial. Half of those who responded indicated that they see at least 10 eligible women each year. The main barriers to recruitment were waiting lists for surgery and access to public funding for IVF. One focus group (n = 7) and five interviews were conducted with potential trial participants (n = 3) and their partners (n = 2). The findings from these discussions highlighted that recruitment and retention in a potential RCT could be improved by coordination between IVF and surgical services such that an operation does not delay IVF or affect access to public funding. Live birth was considered the most important outcome with an improvement of at least 10% considered the minimum acceptable by both patients and clinicians.

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

This feasibility study captured views of clinicians across the UK, but as patients were from a single Scottish centre, their views may not be representative of other areas with limited public funding for IVF.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

There is a need for an appropriately powered RCT to establish whether or not surgical treatment of endometrioma prior to IVF improves live birth rates. There are logistical issues to be considered due to limited number of participants, funding of IVF and waiting times. These could be overcome in a RCT by using an adaptive design which would include a prospectively planned opportunity for modification of specified aspects of the study design based on interim analysis of the data, coordination of IVF treatments and endometriosis surgeries and international collaboration. Similar principles could be used for other questions in fertility where a traditional approach for randomised trials is not feasible.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

Funding was received from the NHS Grampian R&D pump priming fund (RG14437-12). S.B. is Editor-in-Chief of HROPEN, and A.W.H. is Deputy Editor of HROPEN. Neither was involved in the review of this manuscript. L.S. reports grants from CSO and NIHR to do endometriosis research, outside the submitted work. K.C. reports grants from NIHR/HTA and CSO during the conduct of the study. J.H.e., A.W.H., J.D., S.B.r., K.B., G.B., J.H.u. and K.G. report no conflict of interest.

The success of various endometrioma treatments in infertility: A systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies

BACKGROUND

Endometriosis is seen in 0.5%-5% of fertile and 25%-40% of infertile women. To investigate this conflict between gynecologists that ovarian endometriomas should be removed or not before making any decision about pregnancy among infertile women, the authors decided to carry out a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the effect of various available therapeutic methods and notice the impact of these options on women's pregnancy rate.

METHODS

This review is based on PRISMA recommendations with an electronic search using the following databases: PubMed, Scopus, Google scholar, etc, from 2000 to 2018, in the English language. The studies compare pregnancy rate based on four different treatment types of OMAs between infertile women: (surgery + ART, surgery + spontaneous pregnancy, aspiration ± sclerotherapy + ART, and ART alone).

MAIN FINDINGS

At least eight prospective studies were included, in which 553 infertile women were compared in terms of treatment methods of OMAs before trying to become pregnant.

CONCLUSION

Treatments are usually based on the patient's clinical condition and must be individual, with the purpose of relieving pain, improving fertility, or both. The authors do not have not any significant difference between our four groups of study; however, the success of surgical procedure compared to other methods was higher and the success of ART alone was the least.

When more is not better: 10 'don'ts' in endometriosis management. An ETIC * position statement

A network of endometriosis experts from 16 Italian academic departments and teaching hospitals distributed all over the country made a critical appraisal of the available evidence and definition of 10 suggestions regarding measures to be de-implemented. Strong suggestions were made only when high-quality evidence was available. The aim was to select 10 low-value medical interventions, characterized by an unfavorable balance between potential benefits, potential harms, and costs, which should be discouraged in women with endometriosis. The following suggestions were agreed by all experts: do not suggest laparoscopy to detect and treat superficial peritoneal endometriosis in infertile women without pelvic pain symptoms; do not recommend controlled ovarian stimulation and IUI in infertile women with endometriosis at any stage; do not remove small ovarian endometriomas (diameter <4 cm) with the sole objective of improving the likelihood of conception in infertile patients scheduled for IVF; do not remove uncomplicated deep endometriotic lesions in asymptomatic women, and also in symptomatic women not seeking conception when medical treatment is effective and well tolerated; do not systematically request second-level diagnostic investigations in women with known or suspected non-subocclusive colorectal endometriosis or with symptoms responding to medical treatment; do not recommend repeated follow-up serum CA-125 (or other currently available biomarkers) measurements in women successfully using medical treatments for uncomplicated endometriosis in the absence of suspicious ovarian cysts; do not leave women undergoing surgery for ovarian endometriomas and not seeking immediate conception without post-operative long-term treatment with estrogen-progestins or progestins; do not perform laparoscopy in adolescent women (<20 years) with moderate-severe dysmenorrhea and clinically suspected early endometriosis without prior attempting to relieve symptoms with estrogen-progestins or progestins; do not prescribe drugs that cannot be used for prolonged periods of time because of safety or cost issues as first-line medical treatment, unless estrogen-progestins or progestins have been proven ineffective, not tolerated, or contraindicated; do not use robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery for endometriosis outside research settings. Our proposal is to better address medical and surgical approaches to endometriosis de-implementing low-value interventions, with the aim to prevent unnecessary morbidity, limit psychological distress, and reduce the burden of treatment avoiding medical overuse and allowing a more equitable distribution of healthcare resources.

Endometrioma, fertility, and assisted reproductive treatments: connecting the dots

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Surgery has traditionally been the primary treatment option for endometriosis-related infertility of any phenotype. However, advances and refinements of assisted reproductive technologies (ART) permit a more conservative approach in many scenarios. This review summarizes the latest findings in the field of reproductive medicine, which have supported a paradigm shift towards more conservative management of ovarian endometrioma.

RECENT FINDINGS

The presence of ovarian endometrioma per se is likely to impair ovarian reserve and alter ovarian functional anatomy. Conventional laparoscopic surgery is associated with significant risk of additional damage, and less invasive treatment approaches require further evaluation. With regard to infertile women with ovarian endometrioma who are scheduled for ART treatment, current data indicate that prior surgical intervention does not improve ART outcomes, and that controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) does not affect quality of life or pain symptoms.

SUMMARY

Reproductive medicine physicians frequently encounter patients with ovarian endometrioma. The current evidence does not support the postponement of infertility treatment in favour of surgery, except in cases with severe symptoms or to improve follicle accessibility. Although these patients may exhibit diminished ovarian response to COH, their endometrial receptivity, aneuploidy rates, and fertility outcomes are similar to healthy controls. Surgery for ovarian endometrioma provides no benefits in ART treatments.

Live Birth Rate after Surgical and Expectant Management of Endometriomas after In Vitro Fertilization: A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Critical Appraisal of Current Guidelines and Previous Meta-Analyses

Controversy exists regarding surgical management of endometriomas in infertile women before in vitro fertilization (IVF) because growing evidence indicates that surgery may impair the ovarian response. The objective of the present systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare surgical and expectant management of endometriomas regarding IVF outcomes. Prospective and retrospective controlled studies were found via the Cochrane Library, Embase, and MEDLINE databases. Thirteen studies (1 randomized controlled trial and 12 observational studies, N = 2878) were pooled, and similar live birth rates were observed in the surgically and expectantly managed groups (odds ratio = 0.83; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.56-1.22; p = .98). The clinical pregnancy rates (odds ratio = 0.83; 95% CI, 0.66-1.05; p = .86), the number of mature oocytes retrieved, and the miscarriage rates were not statistically different between study groups. However, the total number of oocytes retrieved was lower in the surgery group (mean difference = -1.51; 95% CI, -2.60 to -0.43; p = .02). Findings suggest that surgical management of endometriomas before IVF therapy yields similar live birth rates as expectant management. However, future properly designed randomized controlled trials are warranted.

Endometriosis and ART: A prior history of surgery for OMA is associated with a poor ovarian response to hyperstimulation

Background

Many women whose fertility may have been impaired by endometriosis require assisted reproductive technology (ART) in order to become pregnant. However, the influence of ovarian endometriosis (OMA) on ovarian responsiveness to hyperstimulation has not been clearly established.

Objective

To evaluate the risk of a poor ovarian response (POR) to stimulation and ART outcomes in women with OMA.

Materials and methods

We conducted a large observational controlled matched cohort study in a tertiary care university hospital between 01/10/2012 and 31/12/2015. After matching by age and anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) levels, 201 infertile women afflicted with OMA (the OMA group) and 402 disease-free women (the control group) undergoing an ART procedure were included in the study. The main outcomes that we measured were a POR to hyperstimulation (i.e., ≤ 3 oocytes retrieved, or cancelled cycles), the clinical pregnancy rate, and the live birth rate.

All of the women with endometriosis underwent a pre-ART work-up, in order to obtain an accurate diagnosis and staging of their disease. An OMA diagnosis was based on published imaging criteria (obtained by transvaginal sonography or magnetic resonance imaging) or on histological analysis for patients with a prior history of endometriosis surgery. The statistical analyses were conducted using univariate and multivariate logistic regression models.

Results

The incidence of a POR to hyperstimulation was significantly higher for the OMA group than for the control group [62/201 (30.8%) versus 90/402 (22.3%), respectively; p = 0.02]. However, no significant differences were found between the OMA and the control group in terms of the clinical pregnancy rate [53/151 (35%) versus 134/324 (41.3%), respectively; p = 0.23] and the live birth rate [39/151 (25.8%) versus 99/324 (30.5%), respectively; p = 0.33]. By multivariate analysis, a prior history of surgery for OMA was found to be an independent factor associated with a POR to stimulation [OR = 2.1; 95% CI: 1.1–4.0], unlike OMA without a prior history of surgery [OR: 1.5; 95% CI: 0.9–2.2].

Conclusion

The presence of OMA during ART treatment increased the risk of a POR to hyperstimulation, although the live birth rate was not affected. Furthermore, having OMA and having previously undergone surgery for OMA was identified as an independent risk factor for a POR.

EndoART: A proposed randomized controlled trial on endometriomas in assisted reproductive technologies, comparing the effect of no intervention, surgery, and prolonged GnRH downregulation on pregnancy rates

Background:

Clinical management of endometriomas, prior to starting treatment with assisted reproductive technologies (ART), has since long been a matter of debate. Whereas cystectomy has been advocated in the past, recently more evidence has emerged on the potential negative effect of surgery on ovarian reserve. Parallel to this, prolonged downregulation with GnRH-a (gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists) has been described to improve ART pregnancy rates in women with endometriosis. However, none of these strategies have been assessed in a large randomized controlled trial. The aim of the EndoART study is to assess whether ovarian surgery or prolonged GnRH-a downregulation result in higher pregnancy rates after ART compared to no intervention in women with endometrioma(s).

Methods/design:

A parallel randomized multi-center trial has been designed to compare ART pregnancy rates in three different treatment groups: no intervention, ovarian surgery, and prolonged hormonal suppression by GnRH-a prior to ART. The primary outcome measure studied is the clinical pregnancy rate with fetal heart-beat within 6 months after initiation of a fresh ART cycle. Secondary outcome measures studied include live birth rate after one initiated fresh ART cycle, cumulative clinical pregnancy rate with fetal heart-beat and live birth rates (after one fully completed ART cycle: initiated fresh + eventual associated frozen embryo transfer cycles), ART–specific data (e.g. number of oocytes, number of good quality embryos), complications, pelvic pain, and quality of life.

Conclusion:

This trial may answer the most frequently asked questions by both women with endometriosis and physicians: how do you treat endometrioma in women prior to treatment with ART?

[Surgical management of endometrioma: Different alternatives in term of pain, fertility and recurrence. CNGOF-HAS Endometriosis Guidelines]

Surgical management of ovarian endometrioma is most often part of a global approach of endometriosis pathology. Isolated endometrioma are rare. Laparoscopic cystectomy is the gold standard for surgical management of endometrioma. Nevertheless, this technique impacts the ovarian function. The hemostasis of the ovarian cyst bed should be performed to conserve the ovarian stroma. Ultrasonography-guided cyst aspiration, laparoscopic drainage and simple bipolar coagulation are not recommended as first line of treatment. Based on the actual literature, we cannot state the place of laser-vaporization and plasma-energy ablation in surgical management. Ethanol sclerotherapy could be an alternative to treat recurrent endometrioma. Uncompleted surgical removal of endometriosis lesions increases the recurrence rate. Endometriosis management should take into account the research and treatment of all the pelvic lesion, especially before surgical management of endometrioma. In this context, the evaluation of ovarian reserve could be useful before surgery.

The effect of surgical management of endometrioma on the IVF/ICSI outcomes when compared with no treatment? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective

To assess the impact of surgical management of endometrioma on the outcome of assisted reproduction treatment (ART).

Design

A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Setting

Department of reproductive medicine at teaching university hospital, UK.

Patients

Subfertile women with endometrioma undergoing ART.

Interventions

Surgical removal of endometrioma or expectant management.

Main outcome measures

Clinical pregnancy rate, pregnancy rate, live birth rate, number of oocytes retrieved and number of embryos available and ovarian response to gonadotrophins.

Results

An extensive search of electronic databases for articles published from inception to September 2016 yielded 11 eligible studies for meta-analysis. Meta-analysis was conducted comparing surgery versus no treatment of endometrioma. There were no significant differences in pregnancy rate per cycle, clinical pregnancy rate and live birth rate between women who underwent surgery for endometrioma and those who did not.

Conclusion

Current evidence suggests that women with endometriosis-related infertility have similar cycle outcomes to other patients going through ART. It is pertinent for clinicians to assess the risks of surgical intervention on ovarian reserve prior to initiating therapy.

Surgical outcomes of laparoscopic endometriosis surgery: a 6 year experience

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the present study was to review 6 year experience on the surgical outcomes of laparoscopic endometriosis surgery.

METHODS

A cohort study was performed in Shiraz University of Medical Sciences using data from medical records of 1315 cases of patients with endometriosis undergoing laparoscopic surgery with follow-up of 6 to 72 months.

RESULTS

This study concerned a cohort of 1315 patients diagnosed with endometriosis operated between April 2010 and April 2016, 1086 (82.5%) of whom were in stage III and IV; 968 (73.61%) had endometrioma (regardless of having deep infiltrative endometriosis [DIE] or peritoneal involvement) and 347 (26.39%) of patients had either DIE or peritoneal involvement without endometrioma. Regarding the patients, unilateral endometrioma was statistically significant in the left ovary (p = .002). One hundred and thirty-three (10.7%) rectal wall, 7 (0.32%) sigmoid colon, 4 (0.18%) vagina, 125 (5.6%) ureter and 33 (1.52) bladder involvements were detected. Prior to operation, the pain VAS score was 8.23 ± 2.03, which decreased to 4.46 ± 2.47 in 93.07% of patients. Fifty-three patients (6.56%) needed reoperation. Sixty-six (33.1%) infertile women had spontaneous pregnancy and 15 (25%) became pregnant using intrauterine insemination (IUI) or assisted reproductive technique (ART) post-operatively.

CONCLUSION

Surgical treatment of endometriosis seems to be an effective treatment. DIE can be present in the absence of endometrioma. The rate of left endometrioma is higher due to the pressure effect of the sigmoid colon. Nonetheless, if an expert surgeon performs this procedure, not only the rate of post-operative complications, but also the possibility of recurrence would decrease.

Endometriosis and Infertility: A Systematic Review

Endometriosis is one of the most common gynaecological conditions affecting 6% to 12% of women in the reproductive age group. It can be found in 35% to 45% of women who are trying to conceive and are infertile. Infertility is one of the most common problems associated with endometriosis. This review will look at the evidence that endometriosis may lead to infertility and the data looking at whether surgical correction of endometriosis may improve fertility outcomes.

Weigh the pros and cons to ovarian reserve before stripping ovarian endometriomas prior to IVF/ICSI: A meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To explore the effects of conservative surgery for endometriomas on ovarian responsiveness during assisted reproductive technology (ART) and provide reproductive and gynecological doctors with a more reliable reference program for the treatment of endometriomas.

METHODS

A literature search was performed by searching the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science and Science Direct databases. Studies with inter- and intra-patient comparisons of ovarian responses and oocyte quality between operated and unoperated ovaries and that met the inclusion criteria were retrieved, and the data from the outcome measures were extracted and pooled for this meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Twenty-one published studies (2649 ART cycles) were included. The total amount of gonadotropin (Gn) used (inverse variance (IV):0.48; 95% confidence interval (CI): [0.13, 1.82], P = 0.0007) was significantly increased in the women with endometriomas who had a history of cystectomy. The estrogen (E) level on the day of hCG administration (IV: -0.29; 95% CI: [-0.41, -0.17], P<0.00001), the number of mature or dominant follicles (IV: -1.17; 95% CI: [-1.51, -0.82], P<0.00001) and the total number of oocytes retrieved (IV: -1.78; 95% CI: [-2.38, -1.17], P<0.00001) were significantly decreased in the women with endometriomas who had a history of cystectomy. The duration of stimulation (IV: 0.02; 95% CI: [-0.09, 0.13], P = 0.77), the total number of formed embryos (IV: -0.06; 95% CI: [-0.17, 0.04], P = 0.25), the pregnancy rate(IV:0.98;95%CI[0.82,1.18], P = 0.83) and the live birth rate(IV:0.93;95%CI[0.70,1.23], P = 0.61)were not statistically different between the two groups. Similar intra-patient results were found in the number of mature or dominant follicles (IV: -0.88; 95% CI: [-1.25, -0.52], P<0.00001) and the total number of oocytes retrieved (IV: -3.48; 95% CI: [-4.77, -2.19], P<0.00001).

CONCLUSION

ART might be a better therapeutic method for ovarian endometrioma-related infertility than cystectomy.

Involvement of mesosalpinx in endometrioma is a possible risk factor for decrease of ovarian reserve after cystectomy: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Serum anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) concentration has been used to assess ovarian reserve in patients with endometriosis, especially when endometrioma surgery is involved. Previously, we reported that decreased serum AMH levels after cystectomy for endometriomas can recover to preoperative levels in some cases. In this present study, we assessed the sequential changes in serum AMH levels before and after cystectomy in terms of the state of the mesosalpinx prior to surgery.

METHODS

The retrospective cohort study recruited 53 patients from a series of prospective studies conducted from 2009 to 2015. All patients underwent laparoscopic cystectomy for endometriomas. If either mesosalpinx was involved in the endometrioma or adnexal adhesion before cystectomy, the case was defined as 'involved mesosalpinx' (n = 14). If both mesosalpinx remained anatomically correct, the case was classified as 'intact mesosalpinx' (n = 39). Blood samples were obtained from the patients 2 weeks before surgery, and at 1 month and 1 year after surgery to assess serum AMH levels.

RESULTS

The serum AMH levels (the involved group vs. the intact group) were 1.92 vs. 0.98 (P = 0.552) preoperatively, 0.59 vs. 1.99 (P = 0.049) at 1 month postoperatively, and 0.48 vs. 2.37 ng/mL (P = 0.007) at 1 year postoperatively. The involved mesosalpinx group showed a further decrease in serum AMH levels at 1 year postoperatively, while serum AMH levels in the intact mesosalpinx group tended to recover.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that pre-existing mesosalpinx disturbance, in combination with adhesiolysis, may be involved in the medium- and long-term decrease in ovarian reserve after endometrioma surgery. A disturbance in ovarian blood supply via the mesosalpinx may underlie this.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

UMIN-CTR UMIN000019369 . Retrospectively registered October 15, 2015.

Diagnostic potential of tumor DNA from ovarian cyst fluid

We determined whether the mutations found in ovarian cancers could be identified in the patients' ovarian cyst fluids. Tumor-specific mutations were detectable in the cyst fluids of 19 of 23 (83%) borderline tumors, 10 of 13 (77%) type I cancers, and 18 of 18 (100%) type II cancers. In contrast, no mutations were found in the cyst fluids of 18 patients with benign tumors or non-neoplastic cysts. Though large, prospective studies are needed to demonstrate the safety and clinical utility of this approach, our results suggest that the genetic evaluation of cyst fluids might be able to inform the management of the large number of women with these lesions.

DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.15175.001

More than a third of women develop ovarian cysts during their lifetimes. The vast majority of these cysts are harmless, but a small number are caused by ovarian cancers. These cancers often produce no symptoms until the disease has spread throughout the abdomen or to other organs, so many women go undiagnosed until their chances of being successfully treated are low. Currently, there is no reliable way to determine whether an ovarian cyst is cancerous without performing surgery. As a result, many women undergo unnecessary, invasive surgeries for harmless ovarian cysts.

Tumors shed cells and cell fragments into any fluid that surrounds them. Fluids from cysts in the pancreas, kidney, and thyroid are routinely examined to identify whether they contain cancerous cells. Now, Wang, Sundfeldt et al. show that ovarian cancers also shed DNA into the surrounding cyst fluid. Furthermore, mutations found in this DNA can provide valuable information about whether the cysts are cancerous.

The study was performed by extracting DNA from the fluid in ovarian cysts that had been surgically removed from 77 women. Of these cysts, 10 were harmless cysts, 12 were benign tumors, 31 were invasive cancers, and 24 were so-called borderline tumors, which fall somewhere between the benign tumors and invasive cancers. Only cysts associated with the borderline tumors and invasive cancers need to be surgically removed. Here, Wang, Sundfeldt et al. report that DNA mutations that are characteristic of ovarian cancers were found in 87% of the cysts associated with borderline tumors and invasive cancers. In contrast, these mutations were not found in any of the cysts that do not require surgery.

Fluid can be extracted from an ovarian cyst with a needle during an outpatient visit. Therefore, the results presented by Wang, Sundfeldt et al. suggest a relatively straightforward way of testing the DNA from ovarian cysts before deciding whether surgery is really necessary. First, however, larger studies that follow women with cysts over time will be necessary to confirm that this type of testing is effective and safe.

DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.15175.002

Clinical management of endometriosis-associated infertility

Endometriosis is a common chronic benign disease that affects reproductive age women and causes chronic pelvic pain and infertility. Despite its prevalence, the exact mechanisms of the pathogenesis of endometriosis-associated infertility are unknown, and precise standards of management have not yet been established. Medical and surgical treatments for endometriosis have different effects on the chance of conception, either spontaneously or via assisted reproductive technologies (ART). In this manuscript, we review the literature from years 1979 to 2015 to report on the proposed mechanism of endometriosis-associated infertility, the staging system of endometriosis for pregnancy outcomes and the current management of patients with endometriosis-associated infertility.

Anti-Müllerian hormone levels after laparoscopic cystectomy for endometriomas as a possible predictor for pregnancy in infertility treatments

We assessed the associations between preoperative and postoperative serum anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) levels and parameters of endometriosis and endometriomas surgery with the success of infertility treatments after cystectomy. Seventeen out of 54 patients got pregnant during the infertility treatments. In these patients, the median interval from surgery to conception was 16.3 months. The serum AMH levels 1-year postoperatively were significantly higher in the pregnant group compared to the non-pregnant group (3.44 ± 1.78 versus 2.17 ± 2.24 ng/ml, p = 0.049). The median interval from surgery to recurrence was 34.4 months, and no significant differences were found in the serum AMH levels at any time point between the recurrence and non-recurrence groups. Serum AMH levels 1 year after laparoscopic cystectomy for endometriomas may predict the success of postoperative infertility treatments, but not a recurrence of endometriomas.

In vitro fertilization for endometriosis-associated infertility

Endometriosis is an enigmatic disease affecting 10-15% of reproductive aged women and is encountered in 25-35% of women suffering from infertility. IVF is an effective tool to overcome endometriosis-associated infertility when expectant management or surgery fails. Direct IVF should be envisioned if the female age is greater than 38 year and infertility is long lasting. Likewise, semen characteristics or tubal status that is incompatible with natural conception mandates going straight to IVF. IVF, not only bypasses the distortion of pelvic anatomy associated with advanced stage endometriosis, but also removes gametes from a hostile peritoneal environment. In this article, we address the impact, if any, of endometriosis and endometriomason IVF outcome, whether surgical treatment of early-stage disease, endometriomas or deep infiltrating endometriosis would enhance pregnancy rates in IVF, which protocol to employ for controlled ovarian hyperstimulation for IVF and finally the impact, if any, of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation for IVF on progression of endometriosis.

Reproductive endocrinology and infertility fellowships: is the 'reproductive endocrinology' portion obsolete?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To take inventory of the past and present and project the future direction of our field to help train the next generation of providers.

RECENT FINDINGS

Review the history of the subspecialty and factors contributing to its evolution.

SUMMARY

Reproductive endocrinology and infertility's in-vitro fertilization future is shaping the intellectual priorities and surgical skill requirements of the next generation.

Laparoscopic endometrioma resection increases peri-implantation endometrial HOXA-10 and HOXA-11 mRNA expression

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether laparoscopic endometrioma resection alters peri-implantation endometrial HOXA-10, HOXA-11, LIF, ITGB3 and ITGAV mRNA expression.

DESIGN

Case-control study.

SETTING

Medical school.

PATIENT(S)

Twenty infertile patients with uni- or bilateral endometrioma, five infertile patients having nonendometriotic benign ovarian cyst, and five fertile control subjects.

INTERVENTION(S)

Mid-luteal-phase endometrial sampling was performed at the time of surgery. Second endometrial biopsies were obtained 3 months after laparoscopic endometrioma resection during the mid-luteal phase of the cycle.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Endometrial HOXA-10, HOXA-11, LIF, ITGAV, and ITGB3 mRNA expressions were evaluated with the use of reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction.

RESULT(S)

Significantly decreased endometrial ITGAV mRNA expression was noted in biopsies obtained from endometrioma and nonendometriotic cyst groups before surgery. Trends toward decreased endometrial HOXA-10, HOXA-11, LIF, and ITGB3 mRNA expressions were noted in the endometrioma and nonendometriotic cyst groups before surgery compared with the fertile subjects. However, the differences failed to show statistical significance. Compared with preoperative values, significantly increased HOXA-10 (12.1-fold change) and HOXA-11 (17.2-fold change) mRNA expressions were noted in endometrial biopsies obtained from subjects who were undergoing endometrioma surgery. Fold change in endometrial ITGAV mRNA after endometrioma surgery was found to be 30.1 and indicated a positive regulation. However, this fold increase was statistically insignificant. Expressions of these endometrial receptivity markers did not change significantly after surgical removal of nonendometriotic benign ovarian cysts.

CONCLUSION(S)

Laparoscopic endometrioma resection increases peri-implantation endometrial HOXA-10 and HOXA-11 mRNA expression, suggesting an improvement in endometrial receptivity.

Impact of ovarian endometrioma on ovarian responsiveness and IVF: a systematic review and meta-analysis

In this systematic review and meta-analysis, the effect of ovarian endometrioma on ovarian responsiveness to stimulation and on assisted reproduction outcomes was evaluated. Nine published studies (1039 cases) were included. The number of oocytes retrieved (mean difference [MD] -1.50; 95% CI, -2.84 to -0.15, P = 0.03), metaphase II (MII) oocytes retrieved (MD -3.61; 95% CI -4.44 to -2.78, P < 0.00001) and total embryos formed (MD -0.66; 95% CI -1.13 to -0.18, P = 0.007) were significantly lower in women with ovarian endometrioma than the control group. Gonadotrophin dose, duration of stimulation, number of good-quality embryos, implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate and live birth rate were similar. Comparisons between ovaries with endometriomas and healthy ovaries of the same individuals were also made. Number of oocytes retrieved, MII oocytes retrieved and total embryos formed were not statistically significantly different between the affected ovaries and contralateral normal ovaries. Observational studies showed that ovarian endometrioma was associated with fewer oocytes retrieved, fewer MII oocytes retrieved and fewer total formed embryos. Clinical pregnancy rate and live birth rates were not affected. Intra-patient comparisons in women with unilateral endometrioma suggested the number of oocytes retrieved, MII oocytes retrieved and total embryos formed were similar.

Treatment of endometriosis in women desiring fertility

Endometriosis is a common condition affecting a significant proportion of women in their reproductive age. Apart from the impact of endometriosis on the quality of life of these patients, it also can have an impact on the potential of these women to have a family. The options for treating women with endometriosis desiring a family include surgery or assisted reproduction techniques. The choice of treatment will depend on the stage of disease and the characteristics of the couple seeking help. We review here the latest evidence on the management of endometriosis in women desiring fertility and describe our current practice.

Impact of endometriosis and its staging on assisted reproduction outcome: systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether the presence or severity of endometriosis affects the outcome of assisted reproductive techniques (ART).

METHODS

In this systematic review, all studies comparing the outcome of ART in women with and those without endometriosis, or at different stages of the disease, were considered eligible. We used either risk ratio (RR) or mean difference (MD) and their 95%CIs for comparisons. The primary outcome was live birth; the secondary outcome was clinical pregnancy. Miscarriage and the number of oocytes retrieved were examined as additional outcomes.

RESULTS

We included 92 studies in the review and 78 in the meta-analysis: 20,167 women with endometriosis were compared with 121,931 women without endometriosis, and 1703 women with Stage-III/IV endometriosis were compared with 2227 women with Stage-I/II endometriosis. The following results were observed for the comparison of women with endometriosis vs women without endometriosis: live birth, RR = 0.99 (95%CI, 0.92-1.06); clinical pregnancy, RR = 0.95 (95%CI, 0.89-1.02); miscarriage, RR = 1.31 (95%CI, 1.07-1.59); number of oocytes retrieved, MD = -1.56 (95%CI, -2.05 to -1.08). The following results were observed for the comparison of women with Stage-III/IV vs Stage-I/II endometriosis: live birth, RR = 0.94 (95%CI, 0.80-1.11); clinical pregnancy, RR = 0.90 (95%CI, 0.82-1.00); miscarriage, RR = 0.99 (95%CI, 0.73-1.36); number of oocytes retrieved, MD = -1.03 (95%CI, -1.67 to -0.39).

CONCLUSIONS

Women with endometriosis undergoing ART have practically the same chance of achieving clinical pregnancy and live birth as do women with other causes of infertility. No relevant difference was observed in the chance of achieving clinical pregnancy and live birth following ART when comparing Stage-III/IV with Stage-I/II endometriosis. The quality of the evidence for the additional examined outcomes was very low, not allowing meaningful conclusions to be drawn.

Endometriosis and infertility: how and when to treat?

Endometriosis is defined as the presence of endometrial-like tissue (glands or stroma) outside the uterus, which induces a chronic inflammatory reaction. Although endometriosis impairs fertility, it does not usually completely prevent conception. The question of evidence based-medicine guidelines in endometriosis-associated infertility is weak in many situations. Therefore, we will highlight in this issue where the challenges are.