To add or not to add LH: consideration of LH concentration changes in individual patients

Recombinant luteinizing hormone supplementation in assisted reproductive technology: a review of literature

Background

Luteinizing hormone (LH) has the main role in ovarian function in both natural and artificial cycles. A normal LH concentration during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation is positively correlated to the number and quality of retrieved oocytes and resulting embryos.

Main body of the abstract

In this study, we reviewed whether rLH administration, adjunct to the ovarian stimulation regimen, could improve clinical outcomes. The literature review showed that rLH supplementation improves assisted reproductive technology (ART) outcomes among women with hypogonadotropic hypogonadism, and hyporesponsive women to follicle-stimulating hormone monotherapy. Besides, rLH supplementation has advantages for poor responder women 36–39 years of age. Even though the data suggested no priority regarding the LH source for improving ART outcome, women with different LH polymorphisms who did not respond similarly to ovarian stimulation may benefit from adjuvant rLH therapy.

Conclusion

rLH usage for improving ART outcome should be scrutinized via well-designed studies considering the subgroups of infertile women who benefit the most from rLH adjuvant therapy, the type of ovarian stimulation protocol to which rLH would be added, and also the exact dosage, as well as the proper timing (during or prior to a cycle).

Association between endogenous LH level prior to progesterone administration and live birth rate in artificial frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer cycles of ovulatory women

STUDY QUESTION

Is there an association between serum LH levels prior to progesterone administration and live birth rate (LBR) in artificial frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) cycles?

SUMMARY ANSWER

: Low serum LH levels on the day before progesterone initiation in artificial frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer cycles of ovulatory women are associated with a lower LBR.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

In artificial FET cycles, exogenous oestrogen and progesterone are administered sequentially to mimic the serum hormone pattern similar to the natural cycle. In oestrogen-only phase, the supplemental oestrogen causes thickening of the endometrium and is sometimes accompanied by a rise in serum LH. However, whether the endogenous LH level in artificial FET cycles is related to clinical outcomes remains unclear.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

A retrospective cohort study including 3469 artificial frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer cycles was conducted at a tertiary-care academic medical centre between February 2014 and January 2020.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

A total of 3469 frozen blastocyst transfer cycles were stratified into four groups based on the quartiles of serum LH level before progesterone initiation: <25th percentile (LH < 8.79 mIU/ml), 25-50th percentile (8.79 ≤ LH ≤ 13.91 mIU/ml), 51-75th percentile (13.91 < LH ≤ 20.75 mIU/ml) and >75th percentile (LH > 20.75 mIU/ml). The serum LH level >75th percentile group was considered as the reference group. Patients with polycystic ovarian syndrome or other ovulatory disorders were excluded from the study. We also excluded cycles with an endometrial thickness <7 mm before progesterone initiation and patients with intrauterine adhesions and uterine abnormalities. In order to avoid the interference of BMI, all patients were divided into two categories based on the overweight threshold: BMI <25 kg/m2 and ≥25 kg/m2, and the impacts of serum LH levels on LBR were investigated separately. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analysis were performed to adjust for potential confounders. EmpowerStats software and R-project were used to build smooth curve fitting models.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

Compared with the reference group, the implantation rate significantly decreased with low LH levels (<25th percentile) on the day before progesterone initiation (odds ratio [OR] = 0.74; 95% CI, 0.64-0.86; P = 0.001). Accounting for major covariates, low LH levels were associated with a relatively lower LBR (adjusted OR = 0.649; 95% CI, 0.531-0.794; P < 0.001), mainly due to a lower implantation rate, lower clinical pregnancy rate and higher pregnancy loss rate. Moreover, in the patients with BMI <25 kg/m2, low LH was associated with a lower LBR (P < 0.001); while in the overweight subgroup, LBR and LH were not correlated (P = 0.823).

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

The main limitation of this study is its retrospective design. Owing to the relatively small number in the overweight group, the results of the overweight subgroup should be interpreted with caution.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

The evidence provided in this study shows the importance of serum LH levels on the day before progesterone initiation in patients undergoing artificial FET cycles. Hypothalamic dysfunction may be one of the important causes of a relatively low LH, which is related to impaired pregnancy outcomes. Serum LH levels may be used as one of the clinical indicators to predict pregnancy outcomes.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

No funding and no competing interest were involved in this study.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NA.

Optimising Follicular Development, Pituitary Suppression, Triggering and Luteal Phase Support During Assisted Reproductive Technology: A Delphi Consensus

BACKGROUND

A Delphi consensus was conducted to evaluate global expert opinions on key aspects of assisted reproductive technology (ART) treatment.

METHODS

Ten experts plus the Scientific Coordinator discussed and amended statements plus supporting references proposed by the Scientific Coordinator. The statements were distributed via an online survey to 35 experts, who voted on their level of agreement or disagreement with each statement. Consensus was reached if the proportion of participants agreeing or disagreeing with a statement was >66%.

RESULTS

Eighteen statements were developed. All statements reached consensus and the most relevant are summarised here. (1) Follicular development and stimulation with gonadotropins (n = 9 statements): Recombinant human follicle stimulating hormone (r-hFSH) alone is sufficient for follicular development in normogonadotropic patients aged <35 years. Oocyte number and live birth rate are strongly correlated; there is a positive linear correlation with cumulative live birth rate. Different r-hFSH preparations have identical polypeptide chains but different glycosylation patterns, affecting the biospecific activity of r-hFSH. r-hFSH plus recombinant human LH (r-hFSH:r-hLH) demonstrates improved pregnancy rates and cost efficacy versus human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG) in patients with severe FSH and LH deficiency. (2) Pituitary suppression (n = 2 statements): Gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonists are associated with lower rates of any grade ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) and cycle cancellation versus GnRH agonists. (3) Final oocyte maturation triggering (n=4 statements): Human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) represents the gold standard in fresh cycles. The efficacy of hCG triggering for frozen transfers in modified natural cycles is controversial compared with LH peak monitoring. Current evidence supports significantly higher pregnancy rates with hCG + GnRH agonist versus hCG alone, but further evidence is needed. GnRH agonist trigger, in GnRH antagonist protocol, is recommended for final oocyte maturation in women at risk of OHSS. (4) Luteal-phase support (n = 3 statements): Vaginal progesterone therapy represents the gold standard for luteal-phase support.

CONCLUSIONS

This Delphi consensus provides a real-world clinical perspective on the specific approaches during the key steps of ART treatment from a diverse group of international experts. Additional guidance from clinicians on ART strategies could complement guidelines and policies, and may help to further improve treatment outcomes.

LH Supplementation in Ovarian Stimulation for IVF: The Individual, LH Deficient, Patient Perspective

The availability of recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) and luteinizing hormone (LH) opens an opportunity to individualize ovarian stimulation. While the need for FSH in ovarian stimulation is universal, a question remains whether exogenous LH is beneficial. Previous population-based research showed that added LH is indicated in elderly and in profoundly LH depressed patients. This commentary explores potential individual patient parameters that may hint that this specific individual may prospectively need supplemented LH, irrespective of her age or experience from previous cycles. Specifically, it is suggested that in an antagonist protocol, the degree of LH recovery 24 h post first GnRH antagonist injection can identify those patients who may benefit from added LH. In addition, rising LH during the first 5 days of stimulation may predispose patients to a sharp LH drop following the first GnRH antagonist dose, and the need for added LH.

[Effects of luteinizing hormone supplementation on outcomes of in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer in patients undergoing GnRH-agonist long protocol]

OBJECTIVE

To compare the clinical outcomes of in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET) among patients in different conditions receiving luteinizing hormone supplementation in GnRH-agonist long protocol.

METHODS

Between June, 2010 and December, 2015, 671 IVF-ET cycles with GnRH-agonist long protocol were performed at our center. These cycles were divided into group A with FSH only and group B with FSH and recombinant luteinizing hormone (r-LH) supplementation, and each group was divided into 4 subgroups according to age (<35 or ≥35) and the LH level on the initial day (<1.0 U/L or ≥1.0 U/L). The effects of LH supplementation on the clinical pregnancy rate and implantation rate were compared among different subgroups.

RESULTS

No statistical significances were found between groups A and B in age, body mass index (BMI), basal FSH, basal LH, basal E2, Gn dosage, Gn day, LH on HCG day, E2 on HCG day, P on HCG day, number of oocytes, fertilization rate, available embryo rate or good quality embryo rate per oocyte, but the endometrium thickness on HCG day differed significantly between the two groups. In women below 35 years of age with a LH level on HCG day over 1.0 U/L, r-LH supplementation resulted in a clinical pregnancy rate of 60%, significantly lower than the rate of 79.55% in women without r-LH supplementation (P<0.05). In women over 35 years with a LH level below 1.0 U/L, r-LH supplementation resulted in an implantation rate of 44.74%, as compared with 24.74% in women without r-LH supplementation (P<0.05).

CONCLUSION

In the long protocol, LH supplementation does not improve the oocyte number, fertilization rate, or good quality embryo per oocyte, and does not bring benefits to women below 35 years with a low LH level (<1.0 U/L) or those over 35 years with normal LH level (≥1.0 U/L) after GnRH-agonist administration. But for women over 35 years with low LH levels, r-LH supplementation may improve the clinical pregnancy rate and implantation rate of IVF-ET cycles.

Individualized Treatment from Theory to Practice: The Private Case of Adding LH during GnRH Antagonist-based Stimulation Protocol

The study evaluated the proportion of patients whose pituitary glands respond with a sharp decrease in luteinizing hormone (LH) levels when exposed to a conventional dose of 0.25 mg gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist in a prospective, single-center, non-randomized, proof-of-concept study. Fifty women eligible for in vitro fertilization (IVF) received recFSH (Gonal-F) from day 2 or 3 of menstrual period. Basal estradiol, progesterone, and LH were measured on the same day and 4–5 days later—immediately before GnRH antagonist 0.25 mg administration, and 24 hours after its administration. Responders were defined as “normal” if 24 hours after the first GnRH antagonist injection, LH level was ≥50% of the pre-injection level and as “over-suppressed” if it was <50% of the pre-injection level. Twelve patients (26% of the total) were “over-suppressed” with a mean LH level of 37% of the level 24 hours earlier. These patients also demonstrated a significant decrease in estradiol rise during the first 24 hours after initial antagonist administration. This effect was reversed for the rest of the stimulation period during which recLH (Luveris, 150 IU/day) was added to the “over-suppressed.” If proven advantageous in terms of pregnancy rate, this approach to individualized treatment would be easy to implement. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials. gov Identifier: NCT01936077.

The ratio of late-follicular to mid-follicular phase LH concentrations efficiently predicts ART outcomes in women undergoing ART treatment with GnRH-agonist long protocol and stimulation with recombinant FSH

PURPOSE

To establish an index to predict ART outcomes and to identify infertile patients who need LH supplementation during ovarian stimulation.

METHODS

Serum LH concentrations were measured during the mid- and late-follicular phase in 86 normogonadotropic infertile patients who underwent ART treatment using GnRH-agonist long protocol with recombinant-FSH. The relationships between serum LH concentrations at both time points and ART outcomes were retrospectively analyzed, and the relationships between the ratio of late-follicular to mid-follicular LH concentrations and ART outcomes were also evaluated.

RESULTS

There were no significant correlations between the mid- or late-follicular LH concentrations and ART outcomes. The ratio of late-follicular to mid-follicular LH concentrations <1.0 was considered the relatively LH decreased group (RD group) and ratio >or= 1.0 was considered the relatively LH increased group (RI group). The number of usable embryos in RD group was similar to that in RI group, but the pregnancy and implantation rates in the RD group (9.7% and 5.8%) were significantly lower than those in the RI group (31.1% and 17.2%; p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Relatively decreased LH concentrations during ovarian stimulation using GnRH-agonist long protocol with rec-FSH had a negative effect on ART outcomes. Therefore, the ratio of mid- to late-follicular phase LH concentrations is suggested to be an efficient index to identify patients who might benefit from LH supplementation.

Predictors of ovarian response: progress towards individualized treatment in ovulation induction and ovarian stimulation

Ovarian stimulation is applied in the clinic to restore mono-ovulatory cycles in anovulatory women (ovulation induction) or to induce the development of multiple dominant follicles for assisted reproduction. Ovarian response is the endocrine and follicular reaction of the ovaries to stimulation. Achieving an appropriate ovarian response to anti-estrogens or exogenous gonadotrophins is central to ovulation induction and ovarian stimulation protocols. However, achieving an adequate response, without cycle cancellation or adverse events related to under- or over-stimulation, is complicated by high intra- and inter-individual variability. To predict each patient's ovarian response to medication for ovarian stimulation and to individualize the starting dose of exogenous gonadotrophin or the need for exogenous luteinizing hormone, various clinical, endocrine, ovarian ultrasonographic and genetic characteristics have been explored. Some of these features have been incorporated into prediction models. In this review, the methodology behind predictive factors and prediction models and their potential clinical applicability across ovulation induction and ovarian stimulation are explored.

The impact of luteinizing hormone in assisted reproduction: a review

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Although the key role of luteinizing hormone in ovarian function, the promotion of follicular growth and maturation, is widely acknowledged, its usefulness as a predictor of ovarian status, and as a supplement during fertility treatment, remains controversial.

RECENT FINDINGS

Luteinizing hormone alone is not an effective predictor of ovarian function. In combination with follicle-stimulating hormone, as the so-called follicle-stimulating hormone: luteinizing hormone ratio, it serves as a useful marker of ovarian status. Although published data on luteinizing hormone supplementation during ovarian hyperstimulation are somewhat limited, recent well-designed studies suggest a beneficial effect of: (1) luteinizing hormone supplementation for women with inadequate responses to follicle-stimulating hormone-only stimulation; (2) in primarily young patients with low baseline luteinizing hormone levels and, consequently, insufficient remaining endogenous luteinizing hormone concentration during pituitary suppression; and (3) in older women with higher baseline luteinizing hormone levels and age-appropriate ovarian function, who require higher luteinizing hormone thresholds, even during pituitary suppression.

SUMMARY

Luteinizing hormone levels, as a component of the follicle-stimulating hormone: luteinizing hormone ratio, contribute to the assessment of ovarian function, whereas the supplementation of luteinizing hormone on an individualized basis, in carefully selected patients, improves outcomes of ovarian stimulation with gonadotropins.

LH in the follicular phase: neither too high nor too low

The role of LH in the natural menstrual cycle is not disputed. However, there are a variety of opinions regarding the potential role of exogenous LH in ovulation induction and whether it is actually needed. Recent years have seen renewed interest in this issue for several reasons. First, ovulation-inducing drugs are increasingly being administered to normally ovulating women. Second, recombinant human FSH products completely devoid of LH activity are now available. Third, gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogues (agonists and antagonists) prevent the untimely LH surge but also suppress endogenous LH activity during the follicular phase. This review analyses whether or not all patients need LH for follicular growth stimulation and new opportunities for improved treatment as a result of the availability of recombinant human LH both in patients with ovulatory disorders (World Health Organization (WHO) groups I and II anovulatory patients) and those undergoing multiple follicular development for assisted reproduction.

To add or not to add LH: comments on recent commentaries

Human reproductive evolution, involving a complex interaction of the hypothalamic-pituitary-ovarian axis, the release of pulsatile and threshold concentrations of gonadotrophins and positive and negative feedback systems, has ensured the release of a single viable egg and functioning corpora lutea in the natural menstrual cycle. The use of follicular stimulation regimens to obtain multiple eggs has resulted in a compromise - in terms of the risk of ovarian hyperstimulation, cost, multiple pregnancies, wastage of or the need for cryopreservation of surplus embryos. Even some women with apparently normal menstrual cycles might become 'poor responders' when administered with follicular stimulants, and we still do not know if the incidence of oocyte aneuploidy is artificially raised after stimulation. After the advent of recombinant FSH and LH, the precise roles of these hormones individually needs to be elucidated to understand the physiological requirements for successful ovarian stimulation in each woman undergoing IVF, to maximize her chance and minimise attendant risks. One of the key debates is the role of LH, which in the natural cycle is significant, but may be redundant during ovarian stimulation for IVF. Current outcome indicators are crude when attempting to understand the physiology, and more basic research and randomized, focused clinical trials are needed.

To add or not to add LH: comments on a recent commentary

From a period of time when LH activity supplementation in stimulation protocols for assisted reproductive technology was questioned, recent scientific evidence seems to prove a role of LH activity in optimizing the clinical results of certain subgroups. Until now, apart from the hypogonadotrophic hypogonadal patient, two subgroups of patients have attracted attention: patients over 35 years of age, and normogonadotrophic patients with an initial low response to recombinant FSH (rFSH). However, in a recent paper, another subgroup of patients has been identified: normogonadotrophic patients with high endogenous LH levels (>1.99 IU/l) on day 8 of stimulation after a long GnRH agonist down-regulation. By adding recombinant LH (rLH) from day 8 to the stimulation protocol, this subgroup of patients achieved good implantation rates, similar to those of patients with lower LH levels. Interestingly, the dynamics of the endogenous LH levels during down-regulation in this group of patients differed from those of patients with lower LH levels. The immunoreactivity of the LH molecule does not necessarily reflect the bioactivity, which might explain the beneficial effect of LH activity supplementation in patients with high endogenous LH levels after down-regulation. Future studies should be focused on subgroups to further explore the effect of LH activity supplementation in assisted reproduction techniques.

Effect of an oral contraceptive pill on follicular development in IVF/ICSI patients receiving a GnRH antagonist: a randomized study

This randomized controlled study compared the effectiveness of a gonadotrophin releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocol with or without oral contraceptive (OC) pretreatment on the number of oocytes retrieved in IVF or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) patients. Sixty-four patients were randomized to start recombinant human FSH (r-hFSH) on day 2 or 3 after OC withdrawal (OC group) or on day 2 of a natural cycle (control group). From stimulation day 6 onwards, all patients were treated with daily (0.5 mg/ml) GnRH antagonist (Antide). OC pretreatment resulted in significantly lower starting concentrations of FSH, LH and oestradiol (P < 0.001) and a thinner endometrium (P < 0.0001). In the early stimulation period, fewer large follicles were found after OC pretreatment, leading to a significantly extended stimulation period (11.6 versus 8.7 days, P < 0.0001) with more follicles on the day of recombinant human chorionic gonadotrophin administration (15.4 versus 12.5, P = 0.02) and more oocytes retrieved (13.5 versus 10.2, P < 0.001) as compared with the control group. GnRH antagonist regimen, pretreated with OC, prevented the early endogenous FSH rise and improved follicular homogeneity, resulting in more oocytes. As a consequence of the extended treatment period, more rhFSH was required.

Role of LH in ovarian stimulation: considerations

The role of LH in ovarian stimulation continues to be controversial. Most observational studies on both gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist and GnRH antagonist protocols failed to show an effect on ongoing pregnancy likelihood of punctually measured 'low' or 'high' endogenous LH concentrations during ovarian stimulation. As yet, it is still unknown whether individual patients with strongly suppressed levels of immunoreactive LH would actually benefit from additional LH administration. This can only be explored by means of interventional trials. Most trials on LH supplementation in general populations in both GnRH agonist and GnRH antagonist protocols have not found a benefit of LH supplementation, although it has been indicated that some subgroups, such as older age patients, or patients with a low ovarian response might benefit from LH. These concepts need to be explored further before recommendations can be given as to in who, in what protocol, at what time point and in what doses LH should be supplemented.