Induction of follicular growth and ovulation with urinary and recombinant gonadotrophins

Comparison of the combination of recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone and recombinant luteinizing hormone protocol versus human menopausal gonadotropin protocol in controlled ovarian stimulation: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To systematically review the efficacy of a combination of recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone (rFSH) and recombinant luteinizing hormone (rLH) protocol versus human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG) protocol in controlled ovarian stimulation (COS).

METHODS

PubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and WanFang Data were searched to collect studies published prior to January 2019 on the efficacy of rFSH combined with rLH versus hMG alone in COS. Two reviewers independently screened the literature, conducted the data extraction, and assessed the risk of bias for all selected studies. Then, Review Manager 5.3 software was used for the meta-analysis.

RESULTS

There were 2767 patients from 9 studies. The results showed that among patients aged >30 years for IUI, the combination of rFSH and rLH was superior to hMG alone in clinical pregnancy rate per patient (relative risk [RR] = 1.47, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02 to 2.12) and endometrial thickness (mean difference [MD] = 0.34, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.64). In patients over 30 years old who received IVF, the results tended to favor the combination of rFSH and rLH in clinical pregnancy rate per patient (RR = 4.48, 95% CI 1.15 to 17.46) and live birth rate per started cycle (RR = 1.69, 95% CI 1.96 to 2.71). In patients less than 30 years old who received IVF, the combination of rFSH and rLH was superior to hMG in the number of retrieved oocytes (MD = 3.70, 95% CI 3.27 to 4.13) and inferior to hMG in number of high-quality embryos (MD = -0.60, 95% CI -0.91 to -0.29).

CONCLUSION

The combination of rFSH and rLH may have better efficacy than hMG alone in COS. However, considering the limited sample size of the included studies, the current evidence is not definitive.

Ovarian stimulation: from basic science to clinical application

Treatment for infertility, including ovarian stimulation, was first introduced almost 100 years ago. At this time, radiation therapy became an established treatment, and it was only some decades later that the problem of radiation-induced cancer emerged. Non-human gonadotrophins, such as pregnant mare serum gonadotrophin (PMSG), and human pituitary gonadotrophins (HPG), were commonly used for hormonal stimulation procedures. However, use of PMSG led to antibody formation, and it was therefore only useful for the first treatment cycle. HPG produced good results, but its use came to an end in the late 1980s when it was linked to the development of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. The first hormonal product from human menopausal urine to be used was human menopausal gonadotrophin (HMG), followed later by purified preparations of this product. All of these preparations contained a high percentage of unknown urinary proteins, which interfered with batch-to-batch consistency. This changed with the introduction of recombinant gonadotrophins, produced from an immortalized/standardized mammalian cell line (CHO). More recent developments include the introduction of long-acting gonadotrophin formulations. The development of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogues and more recently the use of GnRH antagonists has helped to improve ovarian stimulation protocols by optimizing their efficacy, and making them easier to administer.

Improving results with assisted reproductive technologies: individualized patient-tailored strategies for ovulation induction

Infertility treatment should be made as efficacious as possible while being simple for patients. Although the treatment paradigm may be, at times, complex, patients deserve pure products that simplify protocol implementation while providing reliable outcomes. The more the treatment experience is simplified and improved, the more patients will benefit from the technology.

Ovarian stimulation: from basic science to clinical application

Treatment for infertility, including ovarian stimulation, was first introduced almost 100 years ago. At this time, radiation therapy became an established treatment, and it was only some decades later that the problem of radiation-induced cancer emerged. Non-human gonadotrophins, such as pregnant mare serum gonadotrophin (PMSG), and human pituitary gonadotrophins (HPG), were commonly used for hormonal stimulation procedures. However, use of PMSG led to antibody formation, and it was therefore only useful for the first treatment cycle. HPG produced good results, but its use came to an end in the late 1980s when it was linked to the development of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. The first hormonal product from human menopausal urine to be used was human menopausal gonadotrophin (HMG), followed later by purified preparations of this product. All of these preparations contained a high percentage of unknown urinary proteins, which interfered with batch-to-batch consistency. This changed with the introduction of recombinant gonadotrophins, produced from an immortalized/standardized mammalian cell line (CHO). More recent developments include the introduction of long-acting gonadotrophin formulations. The development of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogues and more recently the use of GnRH antagonists has helped to improve ovarian stimulation protocols by optimizing their efficacy, and making them easier to administer.

Assessment of the biopotency of follitropin alfa and lutropin alfa combined in one injection: a comparative trial in Sprague-Dawley rats

BACKGROUND

The current study was designed to determine if follitropin alfa (recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone; r-hFSH) and lutropin alfa (recombinant human luteinizing hormone; r-hLH) biopotencies were unchanged by reconstituting in sterile water for injection and mixing prior to injection.

METHODS

The biopotencies of r-hFSH and r-hLH were determined following injection of female Sprague-Dawley rats with a mixture of follitropin alfa revised formulation female (RFF) and lutropin alfa (1:1, r-hFSH:r-hLH). Biopotencies of follitropin alfa RFF and lutropin alfa were measured using ovarian weight and ascorbic acid depletion assays, respectively, and compared with a reference standard. Stock mixtures of follitropin alfa RFF and lutropin alfa (1:1) were prepared within 1 h prior to each respective assay's injection and stored at 6 +/- 2 degrees C. Separate low dose (follitropin alfa RFF 1.5 IU/rat, lutropin alfa 2 IU/rat) and high dose (follitropin alfa RFF 3 IU/rat, lutropin alfa 8 IU/rat) treatments were prepared from stock mixtures or individual solutions by diluting with 0.22% bovine serum albumin saline solution and injected within 1 h of preparation. The main outcome measures were ovarian weight and ovarian ascorbic acid depletion.

RESULTS

FSH bioactivities were similar (p > 0.10) between the individual follitropin alfa RFF test solution (84.2 IU) and follitropin alfa RFF/lutropin alfa (87.6 IU) mixtures prepared within 1 h of injection and stored at 6 +/- 2 degrees C. LH bioactivities were similar (p > 0.10) between lutropin alfa (94.7 IU) test solution and lutropin alfa/follitropin alfa RFF (85.3 IU) mixtures prepared within 1 h of injection and stored at 6 +/- 2 degrees C for not more than 1 h prior to injection.

CONCLUSION

Mixing follitropin alfa RFF and lutropin alfa did not alter the bioactivity of either FSH or LH.

Insights on blastomere nuclearity

PURPOSE

To analyze the results of our transferred embryos, especially those that "changed" their blastomere nuclearity from Multinucleated (MN) to Mono-nucleated during development.

METHODS

Pregnancies where at least one MN embryo was transferred were retrospectively evaluated and categorized in order to record and follow-up on the ones that were implanted. Embryos were classified as normal (when all blastomeres were mono-nucleated on day one and two of development), corrected (multinucleated embryos on day one that became mono-nucleated on day two) and non-corrected (multinucleated either on day one, on day two or both days).

RESULTS

There were 633 transfer cycles analyzed. Thirty-three percent (206) had at least one embryo with a MN blastomere at a given stage of development. Pregnancy and implantation rates were 29.0% and 19.0% for the group of exclusively mono-nucleated embryo transfers, and 28.6% and 15.8% for the group with at least one MN embryo transferred. The pregnancy outcome for "corrected" and "non-corrected" embryos could be corroborated unequivocally in only 9 cases, with an outcome of 8 and 4 normal babies, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Because the amount of data analyzed is not satisfactorily large, differences were not significantly different; however, a trend may exist showing that normal at term pregnancies obtained from corrected embryos are more likely to occur than those from non-corrected embryos. Nuclear observation on a daily basis should be one of the strategies used to select the best embryos for transferring, to improve implantation rates and avoid multiple pregnancies.

Recombinant versus highly-purified, urinary follicle-stimulating hormone (r-FSH vs. HP-uFSH) in ovulation induction: a prospective, randomized study with cost-minimization analysis

BACKGROUND

Both recombinant FSH (r-FSH) and highly-purified, urinary FSH (HP-uFSH) are frequently used in ovulation induction associated with timed sexual intercourse. Their effectiveness is reported to be similar, and therefore the costs of treatment represent a major issue to be considered. Although several studies about costs in IVF have been published, data obtained in low-technology infertility treatments are still scarce.

METHODS

Two hundred and sixty infertile women (184 with unexplained infertility, 76 with CC-resistant polycystic ovary syndrome) at their first treatment cycle were randomized and included in the study. Ovulation induction was accomplished by daily administration of rFSH or HP-uFSH according to a low-dose, step-up regimen aimed to obtain a monofollicular ovulation. A bi- or tri-follicular ovulation was anyway accepted, whereas hCG was withdrawn and the cycle cancelled when more than three follicles greater than or equal to 18 mm diameter were seen at ultrasound. The primary outcome measure was the cost of therapy per delivered baby, estimated according to a cost-minimization analysis. Secondary outcomes were the following: monofollicular ovulation rate, total FSH dose, cycle cancellation rate, length of the follicular phase, number of developing follicles (>12 mm diameter), endometrial thickness at hCG, incidence of twinning and ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome, delivery rate.

RESULTS

The overall FSH dose needed to achieve ovulation was significantly lower with r-FSH, whereas all the other studied variables did not significantly differ with either treatments. However, a trend toward a higher delivery rate with r-FSH was observed in the whole group and also when results were considered subgrouping patients according to the indication to treatment.

CONCLUSION

Considering the significantly lower number of vials/patient and the slight (although non-significant) increase in the delivery rate with r-FSH, the cost-minimization analysis showed a 9.4% reduction in the overall therapy cost per born baby in favor of r-FSH.

Compositional analyses of a human menopausal gonadotrophin preparation extracted from urine (menotropin). Identification of some of its major impurities

Recently, a highly purified human menopausal gonadotrophin preparation (HMG) was launched. The composition and purity of this HMG (Menopur); Ferring Pharmaceuticals) with a claimed 1:1 ratio of FSH and LH was determined. Three gonadotrophins were observed: FSH, LH and human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG). The immunoactivity for HCG was three-fold higher than the immunoactivity for LH. Because of the longer half-life of HCG as compared with LH, about 95% of the in-vivo LH-receptor-mediated bioactivity is attributable to the presence of HCG. This is substantiated by biochemical analyses. To the best of the authors' knowledge, this relatively high amount of HCG can only be explained by assuming the addition of HCG from external sources, which is a well established practice for standardization purposes. In addition to gonadotrophins, a number of other proteins were detected. The amount of these impurities, as determined by reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography on a peak-area basis, is at least 30%. Therefore, it is concluded that this HMG preparation contains at most 70% gonadotrophins. Via a proteomics approach three major impurities were identified: leukocyte elastase inhibitor, protein C inhibitor, and zinc-alpha(2)-glycoprotein. On the basis of the results obtained in this study, a comparison is made with recombinant FSH.

Improving results with assisted reproductive technologies: individualized patient-tailored strategies for ovulation induction

Infertility treatment should be made as efficacious as possible while being simple for patients. Although the treatment paradigm may be, at times, complex, patients deserve pure products that simplify protocol implementation while providing reliable outcomes. The more the treatment experience is simplified and improved, the more patients will benefit from the technology.

Monochorionic triplets after single embryo transfer

A 40-year-old patient underwent intracytoplasmic sperm injection and assisted hatching, and a single embryo was transferred. Ultrasonography demonstrated a single gestational sac containing monochorionic tri-amniotic pregnancy. Several factors that have been implicated in the aetiology of monozygotic triple pregnancies after IVF appear to be present in this case. To avoid multiple pregnancies after IVF, it is time to have definite predictive factors for the occurrence of monozygotic multiple pregnancies as well as transferring only a single embryo.

Ovarian responses to recombinant FSH or HMG in normogonadotrophic women following pituitary desensitization by a depot GnRH agonist for assisted reproduction

At present, there is considerable debate about the utility of supplemental LH in assisted reproduction treatment. In order to explore this, the present authors used a depot gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) protocol combined with recombinant human FSH (rhFSH) or human menopausal gonadotrophin (HMG) in patients undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). The response to either rhFSH (75 IU FSH/ampoule; group rhFSH, 25 patients) or HMG (75 IU FSH and 75 IU LH/ampoule; group HMG, 25 patients) was compared in normo-ovulatory women suppressed with a depot triptorelin injection and candidates for ICSI. A fixed regimen of 150 IU rhFSH or HMG was administered in the first 14 days of treatment. Treatment was monitored with transvaginal pelvic ultrasonographic scans and serum measurement of FSH, LH, oestradiol, androstenedione, testosterone, progesterone, inhibin A, inhibin B and human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) at 2-day intervals. Although oestradiol serum concentrations on the day of HCG injection were similar, both the duration of treatment and the per cycle gonadotrophin dose were lower in group HMG. In the initial 16 days of gonadotrophin treatment, the area under the curve (AUC) of LH, oestradiol, androstenedione and inhibin B were higher in group HMG; no differences were seen for the remaining hormones measured, including the inhibin B:inhibin A ratio. The dynamics of ovarian follicle development during gonadotrophin treatment were similar in both study groups, but there were more leading follicles (>17 mm in diameter) on the day of HCG injection in the rhFSH group. The number of oocytes, mature oocytes and good quality zygotes and embryos obtained were significantly increased in the rhFSH group. It is concluded that in IVF patients undergoing pituitary desensitization with a depot agonist preparation, supplemental LH may be required in terms of treatment duration and gonadotrophin consumption. However, both oocyte, embryo yield and quality were significantly higher with the use of rhFSH.

Fundamentals of human embryonic growth in vitro and the selection of high-quality embryos for transfer

Knowledge of the nature of embryo growth, and the handling and scoring of quality in human embryos are significant aspects for embryologists in IVF clinics. This review describes the formation, growth and maturation of human oocytes, many aspects of fertilization in vitro, embryonic transcription during preimplantation stages, and the formation of polarities, timing controls, role of mitochondria and functions of endocrine and paracrine systems. Modern concepts are fully discussed, together with their significance in the practice of IVF. This knowledge is essential for the correct clinical care of human embryos growing in vitro, especially in view of their uncharacteristic tendency to vary widely in implantation potential. Underlying causes of such variation have not been identified. Stringent tests must be enforced to ensure human embryos develop under optimal conditions, and are scored for quality using the most advanced techniques. Optimal methods of culture are described, including methods such as co-culture introduced to improve embryo quality but less important today. Detailed attention is given to quality as assessed from embryonic characteristics determined by timers, polarities, disturbed embryo growth and anomalous cell cycles. Methods for classification are described. Approaches to single embryo transfers are described, including the use of sequential media to produce high-quality blastocysts. These approaches, and others involved in surgical methods to remove fragments, transfer ooplasm or utilize newer approaches such as preimplantation diagnosis of chromosomal complements in embryos are covered. New outlooks in this field are summarized.

Use of recombinant LH in a group of unselected IVF patients

The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of recombinant luteinizing hormone (rLH) supplementation in an unselected group of IVF patients undergoing follicular stimulation with recombinant follicle stimulating hormone (rFSH) after pituitary down-regulation. Group A comprised 122 cycles administered rFSH and rLH while group B included 331 cycles using rFSH only during the same period of treatment. There was no significant difference in any of the endocrine, embryological and outcome parameters measured. The implantation rate of 14.2% for group A compared with 9.8% for group B showed a positive trend (P = 0.055), but for patients in whom LH concentration was <1.0 IU/l at down-regulation or required excessive FSH stimulation, there was an increased incidence of implantation if rLH was supplemented. It was concluded that the addition of exogenous rLH to an unselected group of 'down-regulated' patients stimulated with rFSH appears to offer little benefit, but in the event of profound LH down-regulation or requirement for excessive exogenous FSH (>2500 IU), the rate of implantation might be improved.