Role of LH in ovarian stimulation: considerations

Lower serum LH level was related to poor embryo quality and adverse pregnancy outcomes in fixed GnRH antagonist protocol with estradiol pretreatment

OBJECTIVE

To disclose the relationships between serum LH and reproductive outcomes in Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocol pretreated with luteal estradiol.

METHODS

371 patients, pretreated with estradiol, followed the GnRH antagonist protocol. They were divided into four groups based on the quartiles of serum LH levels on the day of gonadotropin (Gn) initiation(LHGI) and trigger (LHtrigger). Data on various pregnancy outcomes were collected.

RESULTS

As serum LHGI increased, anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) level, antral follicle count (AFC), LHtrigger, estradiol (E2) and P on the trigger day, E2/oocytes, and oocyte numbers increased and peaked in Q4, while Gn dose decreased. Good-quality embryo and blast formation rates increased and peaked in Q3. LHGI <3.93 mIU/ml impaired ongoing pregnancy rate and LBR. After adjusting for AMH and AFC, the impacts were not significant. As LHtrigger increased, E2/oocytes and good-quality embryo rate increased and peaked in T4 and implantation rate increased and peaked in T3. LHtrigger <1.49 mIU/ml independently influenced clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) after adjusting for AMH and AFC. LHGI was positively related to AMH, AFC, LHtrigger, blast formation rate and negatively related to BMI, age and Gn dose. LHtrigger was positively related to E2/oocytes and good quality embryo rate.

CONCLUSIONS

Lower serum LH represents as a potential indicator for embryo quality and reproductive outcomes in GnRH antagonist fixed protocol pretreated with estradiol. Early identification of excessive suppression of LH levels will benefit individuals with normal ovarian reserve more.

Association between serum LH levels on hCG trigger day and live birth rate after fresh embryo transfer with GnRH antagonist regimen in different populations

Objective

To investigate whether serum LH levels on hCG trigger day are associated with live birth rate (LBR) after fresh embryo transfer with GnRH antagonist regimen in different populations.

Methods

This study was a retrospective study. A total of 3059 fresh embryo transfers were divided into three populations: predicted normal ovarian responders (NOR) (n=2049), patients with PCOS (n=533), and predicted poor ovarian responders (POR) (n=477). Each population was stratified into three groups based on LH levels: < 25th percentile, 25-75th percentile, and > 75th percentile. The primary outcome of the study was LBR, and secondary outcomes included implantation, clinical pregnancy, and early pregnancy loss rates. Univariable and multivariable regression analyses were performed to adjust for potential confounders.

Results

In NOR, compared to the reference group (>75th percentile), LBR was significantly lower in the < 25th percentile group (adjusted OR=0.662; 95%CI, 0.508-0.863) and 25-75th percentile group (adjusted OR=0.791; 95%CI, 0.633-0.988). In PCOS patients, LBR decreased significantly in the < 25th percentile group (41.4%) compared to the 25-75th percentile group (53.7%) and > 75th percentile group (56.1%). In addition, the LBR was lower in the < 25th percentile group (33.6%) compared with the 25-75th percentile group (43.4%) and the>75th percentile group (42.0%) in POR, but this was not statistically significant.

Conclusions

High serum LH levels are associated with increased LBR after fresh embryo transfer in GnRH antagonist cycles, which may be attributable to higher implantation rate. LH may be a predictor of whether to schedule fresh embryo transfer in IVF cycles for better clinical outcomes.

Association between endogenous LH level prior to progesterone administration and live birth rate in artificial frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer cycles of ovulatory women

STUDY QUESTION

Is there an association between serum LH levels prior to progesterone administration and live birth rate (LBR) in artificial frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) cycles?

SUMMARY ANSWER

: Low serum LH levels on the day before progesterone initiation in artificial frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer cycles of ovulatory women are associated with a lower LBR.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

In artificial FET cycles, exogenous oestrogen and progesterone are administered sequentially to mimic the serum hormone pattern similar to the natural cycle. In oestrogen-only phase, the supplemental oestrogen causes thickening of the endometrium and is sometimes accompanied by a rise in serum LH. However, whether the endogenous LH level in artificial FET cycles is related to clinical outcomes remains unclear.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

A retrospective cohort study including 3469 artificial frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer cycles was conducted at a tertiary-care academic medical centre between February 2014 and January 2020.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

A total of 3469 frozen blastocyst transfer cycles were stratified into four groups based on the quartiles of serum LH level before progesterone initiation: <25th percentile (LH < 8.79 mIU/ml), 25-50th percentile (8.79 ≤ LH ≤ 13.91 mIU/ml), 51-75th percentile (13.91 < LH ≤ 20.75 mIU/ml) and >75th percentile (LH > 20.75 mIU/ml). The serum LH level >75th percentile group was considered as the reference group. Patients with polycystic ovarian syndrome or other ovulatory disorders were excluded from the study. We also excluded cycles with an endometrial thickness <7 mm before progesterone initiation and patients with intrauterine adhesions and uterine abnormalities. In order to avoid the interference of BMI, all patients were divided into two categories based on the overweight threshold: BMI <25 kg/m2 and ≥25 kg/m2, and the impacts of serum LH levels on LBR were investigated separately. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analysis were performed to adjust for potential confounders. EmpowerStats software and R-project were used to build smooth curve fitting models.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

Compared with the reference group, the implantation rate significantly decreased with low LH levels (<25th percentile) on the day before progesterone initiation (odds ratio [OR] = 0.74; 95% CI, 0.64-0.86; P = 0.001). Accounting for major covariates, low LH levels were associated with a relatively lower LBR (adjusted OR = 0.649; 95% CI, 0.531-0.794; P < 0.001), mainly due to a lower implantation rate, lower clinical pregnancy rate and higher pregnancy loss rate. Moreover, in the patients with BMI <25 kg/m2, low LH was associated with a lower LBR (P < 0.001); while in the overweight subgroup, LBR and LH were not correlated (P = 0.823).

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

The main limitation of this study is its retrospective design. Owing to the relatively small number in the overweight group, the results of the overweight subgroup should be interpreted with caution.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

The evidence provided in this study shows the importance of serum LH levels on the day before progesterone initiation in patients undergoing artificial FET cycles. Hypothalamic dysfunction may be one of the important causes of a relatively low LH, which is related to impaired pregnancy outcomes. Serum LH levels may be used as one of the clinical indicators to predict pregnancy outcomes.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

No funding and no competing interest were involved in this study.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NA.

Individualized Treatment from Theory to Practice: The Private Case of Adding LH during GnRH Antagonist-based Stimulation Protocol

The study evaluated the proportion of patients whose pituitary glands respond with a sharp decrease in luteinizing hormone (LH) levels when exposed to a conventional dose of 0.25 mg gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist in a prospective, single-center, non-randomized, proof-of-concept study. Fifty women eligible for in vitro fertilization (IVF) received recFSH (Gonal-F) from day 2 or 3 of menstrual period. Basal estradiol, progesterone, and LH were measured on the same day and 4–5 days later—immediately before GnRH antagonist 0.25 mg administration, and 24 hours after its administration. Responders were defined as “normal” if 24 hours after the first GnRH antagonist injection, LH level was ≥50% of the pre-injection level and as “over-suppressed” if it was <50% of the pre-injection level. Twelve patients (26% of the total) were “over-suppressed” with a mean LH level of 37% of the level 24 hours earlier. These patients also demonstrated a significant decrease in estradiol rise during the first 24 hours after initial antagonist administration. This effect was reversed for the rest of the stimulation period during which recLH (Luveris, 150 IU/day) was added to the “over-suppressed.” If proven advantageous in terms of pregnancy rate, this approach to individualized treatment would be easy to implement. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials. gov Identifier: NCT01936077.

Exogenous hCG activity, but not endogenous LH activity, is positively associated with live birth rates in anovulatory infertility

Objective

To evaluate, retrospectively, the roles of endogenous and exogenous luteinising hormone (LH) activity on live birth rate in ovulation induction cycles.

Methods

Associations between LH activity at baseline, end of stimulation and live birth rate were analysed in relation to patient characteristics, baseline and end of stimulation variables in WHO group II anovulatory women (n=155) stimulated with recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone (rFSH) or highly purified human menopausal gonadotrophin (HP-hMG). HP-hMG provides FSH and exogenous LH activity mainly in the form of human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG).

Results

Serum LH concentrations at baseline or end of stimulation were not predictive of live birth rate in the rFSH group (n=79) or HP-hMG group (n=76). Serum hCG concentration at end of stimulation was a significant positive predictor in HP-hMG-treated women. Other variables were not independently predictive of live birth in either of the groups, except for a negative association between serum FSH concentrations at the start of stimulation and live birth in the rFSH-treated group.

Conclusions

Endogenous LH concentrations are not predictive of live birth in anovulatory WHO group II patients undergoing ovulation induction with rFSH or HP-hMG. On the other hand, exogenous hCG activity during HP-hMG stimulation is positively associated with treatment outcome.

Relationship between visualization of meiotic spindle in human oocytes and ICSI outcomes: a meta-analysis

The objective of this meta-analysis was to investigate the influence of meiotic spindle visualization in human oocytes on intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) outcomes. Search strategies included on-line surveys of databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Science Citation Index, Cochrane Controlled Trials Register and Ovid). The fixed effect was used for odds ratio. Ten trials fulfilled the inclusion criteria comparing in-vitro and clinical ICSI outcomes with or without visualization of meiotic spindle in fresh and in-vivo matured oocytes. According to the meta-analysis, the results showed statistically significant higher fertilization rate (P < 0.0001) when the meiotic spindle was viewed than when it was not. Moreover, the percentage of pro-nuclear-stage embryos with good morphology (P = 0.003), cleavage rate (P < 0.0001), percentage of day-3 top-quality embryos (P = 0.003) and percentage of embryos that reached the blastocyst stage (P < 0.0001) were statistically significantly better among embryos derived from oocytes in which meiotic spindle was viewed compared with those in which meiotic spindle was not observed. However, these differences were not observed in the clinical pregnancy or implantation rates. This observation has clinical relevance mainly in countries where there is a legal limit on the number of oocytes to be fertilized. However, additional controlled trials are needed to further confirm these results.

Bioequivalence of recombinant human FSH and recombinant human LH in a fixed 2:1 combination: two phase I, randomised, crossover studies

OBJECTIVES

To assess bioequivalence of recombinant human follicle stimulating hormone (r-hFSH, follitropin alfa) and recombinant human luteinising hormone (r-hLH, lutropin alfa) in a fixed 2:1 combination (Pergoveris) compared with injection of each of the hormones separately.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Two, two-way crossover, phase I studies in healthy female volunteers after gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist down-regulation. Volunteers were randomised to the order in which they received subcutaneous injections. In the r-hFSH study, volunteers received one injection of r-hFSH (300 IU) and one of r-hFSH (300 IU)/r-hLH (150 IU) > or = 7 days apart; in the r-hLH study they received r-hLH (450 IU) and r-hFSH (900 IU)/r-hLH (450 IU) > 21 days apart.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The serum concentration-time profiles of FSH in the r-hFSH study and LH in the r-hLH study from zero to the last measurable concentration (AUC(0-last)) and the peak FSH/LH serum concentrations (C(max)) were assessed by non-compartmental analysis. The pre-defined range for bioequivalence was 0.8-1.25 for 90% confidence intervals (CI) of the ratio (fixed combination/single gonadotrophin) of the mean for each pharmacokinetic parameter.

RESULTS

Bioequivalence criteria were met for the r-hFSH study (n = 34) for C(max) (ratio of means 1.0024, 90% confidence interval (CI) 0.9611-1.0454) and AUC(0-last) (ratio of means 1.0167, 90% CI 0.9933-1.0407), and for the r-hLH study (n = 63) for C(max) (ratio of means 0.9687, 90% CI 0.9194-1.0207) and AUC(0-last) (ratio of means 0.9753, 90% CI 0.8990-1.0581). In the r-hFSH study, 20 adverse events (AEs) were reported after injection of r-hFSH and 20 after r-hLH/r-hFSH. In the r-hLH study, 179 AEs were reported after injection of r-hLH and 193 after the fixed-dose combination. Across both studies, headache was the most commonly reported AE. No serious AEs occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

These studies demonstrated bioequivalence between r-hFSH and r-hLH administered alone or in fixed 2:1 combination. The 2:1 combination of follitropin alfa and lutropin alfa allows administration of both recombinant gonadotrophins in a single injection.

Change, change, change: hormonal actions depend on changes in blood levels

The main hypothesis outlined in this communication is that changes in hormonal levels are of utmost importance in the female reproductive system physiology. Hormone measurements must be assessed in the context of time and change. We hypothesize that changes in hormone concentrations carry significant biological messages, much more than a given level at a given time point and if proved, this theory could give rise to better approaches to treatment, and risk assessment.

Predictors of ovarian response: progress towards individualized treatment in ovulation induction and ovarian stimulation

Ovarian stimulation is applied in the clinic to restore mono-ovulatory cycles in anovulatory women (ovulation induction) or to induce the development of multiple dominant follicles for assisted reproduction. Ovarian response is the endocrine and follicular reaction of the ovaries to stimulation. Achieving an appropriate ovarian response to anti-estrogens or exogenous gonadotrophins is central to ovulation induction and ovarian stimulation protocols. However, achieving an adequate response, without cycle cancellation or adverse events related to under- or over-stimulation, is complicated by high intra- and inter-individual variability. To predict each patient's ovarian response to medication for ovarian stimulation and to individualize the starting dose of exogenous gonadotrophin or the need for exogenous luteinizing hormone, various clinical, endocrine, ovarian ultrasonographic and genetic characteristics have been explored. Some of these features have been incorporated into prediction models. In this review, the methodology behind predictive factors and prediction models and their potential clinical applicability across ovulation induction and ovarian stimulation are explored.

The impact of luteinizing hormone in assisted reproduction: a review

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Although the key role of luteinizing hormone in ovarian function, the promotion of follicular growth and maturation, is widely acknowledged, its usefulness as a predictor of ovarian status, and as a supplement during fertility treatment, remains controversial.

RECENT FINDINGS

Luteinizing hormone alone is not an effective predictor of ovarian function. In combination with follicle-stimulating hormone, as the so-called follicle-stimulating hormone: luteinizing hormone ratio, it serves as a useful marker of ovarian status. Although published data on luteinizing hormone supplementation during ovarian hyperstimulation are somewhat limited, recent well-designed studies suggest a beneficial effect of: (1) luteinizing hormone supplementation for women with inadequate responses to follicle-stimulating hormone-only stimulation; (2) in primarily young patients with low baseline luteinizing hormone levels and, consequently, insufficient remaining endogenous luteinizing hormone concentration during pituitary suppression; and (3) in older women with higher baseline luteinizing hormone levels and age-appropriate ovarian function, who require higher luteinizing hormone thresholds, even during pituitary suppression.

SUMMARY

Luteinizing hormone levels, as a component of the follicle-stimulating hormone: luteinizing hormone ratio, contribute to the assessment of ovarian function, whereas the supplementation of luteinizing hormone on an individualized basis, in carefully selected patients, improves outcomes of ovarian stimulation with gonadotropins.

Effects of rhFSH dose on ovarian follicular response, oocyte recovery and embryo development in rhesus monkeys

The objective was to study the effects of dose of recombinant human follicular stimulating hormone (rhFSH) for ovarian stimulation in rhesus monkeys. Nineteen pubertal and 109 adult female rhesus monkeys were given 37.5, 18, or 9 IU of rhFSH twice-daily for 8 days (total of 600, 300, or 150 IU of rhFSH per cycle, respectively; designated Regimens 1, 2 and 3). Ovarian responses were assessed with ultrasonography, serum concentrations of E2 and FSH, and by in vitro developmental potential (following IVF) of retrieved oocytes. Regimen 1 had more monkeys with very large follicles (diameter>8 mm) than Regimen 2 (P<0.05), which impaired development potential. However, there were no differences between Regimens 1 and 2 in oocyte recovery, whereas Regimen 3 did not elicit superovulation. The developmental potential of embryos obtained from Regimen 2 was higher than that of Regimen 1, as determined by culture to the blastocyst stage in vitro (proportion of blastocysts relative to collected MII oocytes was 55.8% versus 36.8% in pubertal and 63.8% versus 44.2% in adult monkeys; P<0.05 for each), and the results of embryo transfer from Regimen 2 were acceptable. In conclusion, we inferred that the optimal rhFSH dose for ovarian stimulation in rhesus monkeys was a total of 300 IU; this dose should be efficacious for ovarian stimulation as the quality or recovered oocytes was higher and the risk of overstimulation was reduced.

Recombinant LH supplementation to recombinant FSH during induced ovarian stimulation in the GnRH-antagonist protocol: a meta-analysis

This study aims to compare the efficacy of recombinant LH (rLH) supplementation for ovarian stimulation in gonadotrophin-releasing hormone-antagonist protocol for IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles. Search strategies included online surveys of databases. The fixed effects model was used for odds ratio (OR) and effect size (weighted mean difference, WMD). Five trials fulfilled the inclusion criteria. When the meta-analysis was carried out, advantages were observed for the LH supplementation protocol with respect to higher serum oestradiol concentrations on the day of human chorionic gonadotrophin administration P < 0.0001; WMD: 514, 95% CI 368, 660) and higher number of mature oocytes (P = 0.0098; WMD: 0.88, 95% CI 0.21, 1.54). However, these differences were not observed in the total amount of recombinant FSH (rFSH) administered, days of stimulation, number of oocyets retrieved, the clinical pregnancy rate per oocyte retrieval, the implantation rate and miscarriage rate. This result demonstrates that the association of rLH with rFSH may prevent any decrease in oestradiol after antagonist administration and that a significantly higher number of mature oocytes was available for laboratory work. Nevertheless, it failed to show any statistically significant difference in clinically significant end-points in IVF (implantation and pregnancy rates). Additional randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm these results further.

High-dose recombinant LH add-back strategy using high-dose GnRH antagonist is an innovative protocol compared with standard GnRH antagonist

High daily doses of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonists during the follicular phase of ovarian stimulation were associated with low implantation rates. To test if this occurred because of profound pituitary suppression, the pituitary response was suppressed with a high-dose GnRH antagonist and recombinant LH (rLH) was added back to correct the implantation rate. An open-label, randomized, controlled, prospective clinical study in 60 patients undergoing IVF was performed. GnRH antagonist was initiated on day 6 of stimulation (2 mg/day) together with 375 IU rLH, and maintained until the day of HCG administration. Controls received 0.25 mg/day GnRH antagonist. Fluctuating LH concentrations were present on days 3 and 6 in both groups. This strong fluctuation continued on day 8 and on the day of HCG administration in the control (low-dose) group, where 30% of patients had LH concentrations <1 IU/l on the HCG day. The study (high-dose) group showed stable LH concentrations on day 8 and on the HCG day, with no LH surges. No clinical differences were found between groups. The LH add-back strategy (375 IU/day) rescued the adverse effects that high doses of GnRH imposed on implantation. These results suggest that rLH should be considered during ovarian stimulation with GnRH antagonist.