Direct ovarian effects and safety aspects of GnRH agonists and antagonists

Impact of an oral gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist on severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in a patient with breast cancer who received a sustained-release gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist: A case report

Postoperative hormone therapy for hormone-sensitive patients with breast cancer is important to prevent a recurrence. As hormone therapy does not induce infertility in patients, fertility-preserving therapy is not provided during treatment. Here, however, we performed controlled ovarian stimulation and embryo freezing for fertility preservation under the influence of a sustained-release gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist in a patient with breast cancer whose postoperative treatment plan was changed from hormone therapy to chemotherapy. After oocyte retrieval, the patient developed treatment-resistant severe symptomatic ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Following treatment with oral gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist, her symptoms immediately improved, and she could receive chemotherapy on schedule.

Role of GnRH Isoforms in Paracrine/Autocrine Control of Zebrafish (Danio rerio) Spermatogenesis

It is well established that hypothalamic GnRH (gonadotropin-releasing hormone) is one of the key peptides involved in the neuroendocrine control of testicular development and spermatogenesis. However, the role of GnRH as a paracrine regulator of testicular function has not been fully investigated. The present study demonstrates the presence of GnRH and its receptors in the zebrafish (Danio rerio) testis, and provides information on direct action of native GnRH isoforms (GnRH2 and GnRH3) on different stages of spermatogenesis in this model. Both GnRH2 and GnRH3 stimulated basal spermatogenesis by increasing numbers of type Aund spermatogonia, spermatozoa, and testosterone release, and in this study GnRH2 exerted higher relative activity than GnRH3. Next, we evaluated the effects of GnRH isoforms on human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG)- and follicle-stimulating hormone (Fsh)-induced spermatogenesis. The 2 GnRH isoforms were found to have different effects on Fsh- and hCG-induced response depending on the stage of spermatogenesis and concentration of the peptides. The results provide strong support for the hypothesis that locally produced GnRH2 and GnRH3 are important components of the complex multifactorial system that regulates testicular germinal cell development and function in adult zebrafish.

Morphometric and ultrastructural analysis of human granulosa cells after gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist or antagonist

Morphological features of granulosa cells can reflect their functional status. The present study was aimed at comparing possible differences in the fine structure of human granulosa cells exposed to gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist or antagonist treatment during ovarian stimulation. Cells were obtained from follicular aspirates of 21 women treated with recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone (rFSH) plus either a GnRH agonist or a GnRH antagonist. Conventional light microscopy procedures and computerized image analysis systems were used to identify different cell type morphological patterns and to quantify different cells distribution. Two morphologically distinct granulosa cell populations, defined as large/pale and small/dark cells, were identified and a different distribution in the two groups of women under investigation was found: a significantly higher percentage in large/pale cells was detected in the agonist-treated women (P<0.05), whereas the percentage of small/dark cells was significantly higher in the antagonist-treated group (P<0.05). Ultrastructural observations showed the presence in both cell populations of typical hallmarks of steroidogenic cells, highlighting signs of functional activity in the large/pale cell population. Further investigations are needed to define the possible clinical significance of these morphological findings.

Leuprolide acetate reduces both in vivo and in vitro ovarian steroidogenesis in infertile women undergoing assisted reproduction

Despite the probable inhibitory effects of GnRH analogues on ovarian steroidogenesis in vitro, their association with assisted reproduction protocols shows favorable results. This suggests that there are important differences in the behaviors of these drugs when administered in vivo versus in vitro. To clarify these differences, this study was designed to analyze the effect of leuprolide acetate (LA) on ovarian steroidogenesis in women undergoing In Vitro Fertilization (IVF). A prospective, randomized open label study was conducted on 14 women (26-35 years): seven receiving only gonadotrophins (Group 1) and seven receiving gonadotrophin plus LA at 1mg/day (Group 2). The LA in vivo effect was determined with serum and follicular fluid (FF) samples and via luteinized granulosa cell cultivation (GCC), where cells were obtained during oocyte retrieval after ovarian hyperstimulation. In vitro analysis was performed via addition of LA to GCC only for Group 1 (without LA) at progressively higher concentrations (0, 10(-12), 10(-9) and 10(-6)M). In vivo, the main observation was a reduction in androgen production in Group 2, represented by lower androstenedione production in FF (G1=6479+/-3458; G2=3021+/-1119 ng/ml; p=0.04) and a lower testosterone peak in GC at 96h (G1=0.64+/-0.12 ng/ml; G2=0.50+/-0.19 ng/ml; P=0.02), but a higher fertilization rate (G1=67%; G2=83%; p=0.009). In vitro, testosterone, estradiol and progesterone were also reduced by LA, even though this reduction occurred for progesterone only at the highest LA dosage (10(-6)M; 606.0+/-114.3 ng/ml versus 1524.0+/-246.5 ng/ml; p=0.02). Results show that LA reduces ovarian steroidogenesis in vivo by essentially inhibiting androgen synthesis; whereas, in vitro, ovarian steroidogenesis is reduced overall.

Similar outcome for cryopreserved embryo transfer following GnRH-antagonist/GnRH-agonist, GnRH-antagonist/HCG or long protocol ovarian stimulation

The pregnancy rates after triggering of final oocyte maturation with gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist in GnRH-antagonist ovarian stimulation protocols are lower than those following triggering with human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG). Furthermore, lower pregnancy rates following GnRH-antagonist protocols compared with long GnRH-agonist protocols have been reported. The differences might be due to an impact on oocyte number and quality or on the endometrium. If any stimulation protocol had a negative impact on oocyte quality, then further evidence of this effect would be observed following frozen-thawed embryo transfer originating from that stimulation cycle. The outcome of frozen-thawed embryo transfer was retrospectively analysed using the long protocol with triptorelin depot 3.75 mg (n = 215) or 0.1 mg/day (n = 83), or GnRH-antagonist protocol with either HCG (n = 69) or GnRH-agonist (n = 25) for final oocyte maturation. The outcomes measured were implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate, ongoing pregnancy rate and embryo survival rate. All outcomes were similar in the four groups. It is concluded that the potential for frozen-thawed embryos to implant and develop following transfer is independent of the GnRH-analogue and the final oocyte maturation protocol used in the collection cycle. Lower IVF embryo transfer success using GnRH-antagonist/GnRH-agonist protocol does not appear to be related to an adverse effect on oocyte quality.

Gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist in in vitro fertilization superovulation

The use of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonists in in vitro fertilization superovulation remains controversial. The GnRH agonist 'long protocol' has been seen as the gold standard for many years. Comparisons and meta-analyses of the efficacy of GnRH antagonists and agonists have been largely inconclusive, with the dataset being contaminated with outdated reports of poorer efficacy with GnRH antagonists, which have stemmed from studies of their use as a second-line drug in older women and women who were poor responders. This work cannot reflect the actual clinical effectiveness of GnRH antagonist and must be interpreted with care. The major advantages of GnRH antagonists use in superovulation include a gentler and more patient-friendly stimulation cycle with less hypoestrogenic side effects, with the potential to lower the risk of ovarian hyperstimulation and enhanced embryo growth. Our current clinical experience with GnRH antagonists in in vitro fertilization is limited, although there are a growing number of in vitro fertilization centers embracing this new technology. There is a clear need for a modern, suitably powered clinical trial to demonstrate the place of GnRH antagonist-based superovulation protocols and in subgroups of patients, such as polycystic ovary syndrome or poor responders.

Does hormone replacement therapy prevent epithelial ovarian cancer?

Two much-debated hypotheses regarding the aetiology of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) are incessant ovulation and gonadotrophin stimulation. A significant inverse correlation is found between the risk of EOC and number of pregnancies, duration of oral contraceptive use (about 10% risk reduction per year) and duration of breastfeeding. Whereas ovulation in the 20-29 year age group was associated with a 20% increase in risk for each year of ovulation, maximum protective effect was noticed in late childbirth (>35 years). Although both in-vitro and in-vivo studies showed that gonadotrophins may initiate and stimulate the growth of EOC, it is not known whether gonadotrophins promote EOC. FSH and LH receptors have been detected by ligand-binding assay and by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction in ovarian surface epithelium (OSE) and in malignant epithelial ovarian tissue. Key aetiological events for this cancer may occur in the premenopausal period. Although hormone replacement therapy (HRT) can lower FSH and LH concentrations substantially, it cannot reduce EOC. The ideal time of ovulation and/or gonadotrophin suppression for prevention of EOC, and why oral contraceptives (OC) can but HRT cannot reduce EOC effectively, are unknown. Various growth-related genes, factors, adhesion molecules and angiogenic factors are present in OSE. Pituitary ovarian axis hormones seem to maintain a delicate balance towards growth control whilst the resultant chain of abnormal growth-promoting events occur at cellular level. Reports regarding the relation of exogenous and endogenous hormones, especially oestrogen, and post-menopausal EOC are reviewed.

Recombinant LH in ovarian stimulation

The advent of recombinant gonadotrophins brought significant changes in fertility therapy. Treatment options with recombinant gonadotrophins add more to knowledge on folliculogenesis and ovarian steroidogenesis. Over a decade, recombinant LH (rLH) has been used for clinical trials, and the amount of peripheral LH that is necessary for optimal follicular growth, oocyte maturation, subsequent embryo development and assisted reproduction outcome during ovulation induction can now be better evaluated. This review evaluates the effect of rLH supplementation on ovarian stimulation and assisted reproduction outcome. The studies conducted with rLH supplementation in ovarian stimulation in different groups of patients and in cases of controlled ovarian stimulation are clearly discussed in this review.

GnRH antagonists in IVF

The present review summarizes existing knowledge on the use of gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonists based on experience gathered after the completion of phase III comparative trials with GnRH agonists. Available data suggest that prolongation of the follicular phase significantly decreases the probability of pregnancy. Moreover, patients with elevated progesterone at initiation of stimulation have significantly fewer chances of achieving an ongoing pregnancy. Luteal support remains mandatory, while the replacement of human chorionic gonadotrophin by GnRH agonist does not appear to be feasible. Although not conclusive, existing data are not in favour of increasing the starting dose of gonadotrophins, of LH supplementation or of using a flexible antagonist protocol.

Beneficial effects of GnRH agonist administration prior to ovarian stimulation for patients with a short follicular phase

A short follicular phase is an early clinical feature of declining reproductive competence. The shortening of the follicular phase length is related to both advanced recruitment and selection of the dominant follicle secondary to an earlier and higher FSH rise during the luteal-follicular transition, while the late follicular growth is normal. As a short follicular phase may be detrimental for reproduction, it was postulated that increasing the duration of follicular phase could improve conception rate. For that purpose, gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist minidoses were administered in the mid-luteal phase to prevent the intercycle FSH rise before tailoring follicular growth by controlled exogenous FSH administration. This regimen, applied to 69 infertile ovulatory women with a short follicular phase (9.6 +/- 1.2 days) actually lengthened the follicular phase by about 3 days. It proved to be effective in 179 cycles to induce paucifollicular development (1.8 +/- 0.9 follicles) with a low cancellation rate (4%) and a moderate requirement for gonadotrophins [13.3 +/- 6.3 ampoules (75 IU)]. In those women with a high frequency (80%) of elevated basal FSH or oestradiol concentrations, the pregnancy rate reached 15.1%/cycle but the miscarriage rate remained high (44%). Thus, increasing the follicular phase length in patients with a short follicular phase may partially restore fecundity.