1
|
Strich JR, Mishuk A, Diao G, Lawandi A, Li W, Demirkale CY, Babiker A, Mancera A, Swihart BJ, Walker M, Yek C, Neupane M, De Jonge N, Warner S, Kadri SS. Assessing Clinician Utilization of Next-Generation Antibiotics Against Resistant Gram-Negative Infections in U.S. Hospitals : A Retrospective Cohort Study. Ann Intern Med 2024; 177:559-572. [PMID: 38639548 DOI: 10.7326/m23-2309] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/20/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The U.S. antibiotic market failure has threatened future innovation and supply. Understanding when and why clinicians underutilize recently approved gram-negative antibiotics might help prioritize the patient in future antibiotic development and potential market entry rewards. OBJECTIVE To determine use patterns of recently U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved gram-negative antibiotics (ceftazidime-avibactam, ceftolozane-tazobactam, meropenem-vaborbactam, plazomicin, eravacycline, imipenem-relebactam-cilastatin, and cefiderocol) and identify factors associated with their preferential use (over traditional generic agents) in patients with gram-negative infections due to pathogens displaying difficult-to-treat resistance (DTR; that is, resistance to all first-line antibiotics). DESIGN Retrospective cohort. SETTING 619 U.S. hospitals. PARTICIPANTS Adult inpatients. MEASUREMENTS Quarterly percentage change in antibiotic use was calculated using weighted linear regression. Machine learning selected candidate variables, and mixed models identified factors associated with new (vs. traditional) antibiotic use in DTR infections. RESULTS Between quarter 1 of 2016 and quarter 2 of 2021, ceftolozane-tazobactam (approved 2014) and ceftazidime-avibactam (2015) predominated new antibiotic usage whereas subsequently approved gram-negative antibiotics saw relatively sluggish uptake. Among gram-negative infection hospitalizations, 0.7% (2551 [2631 episodes] of 362 142) displayed DTR pathogens. Patients were treated exclusively using traditional agents in 1091 of 2631 DTR episodes (41.5%), including "reserve" antibiotics such as polymyxins, aminoglycosides, and tigecycline in 865 of 1091 episodes (79.3%). Patients with bacteremia and chronic diseases had greater adjusted probabilities and those with do-not-resuscitate status, acute liver failure, and Acinetobacter baumannii complex and other nonpseudomonal nonfermenter pathogens had lower adjusted probabilities of receiving newer (vs. traditional) antibiotics for DTR infections, respectively. Availability of susceptibility testing for new antibiotics increased probability of usage. LIMITATION Residual confounding. CONCLUSION Despite FDA approval of 7 next-generation gram-negative antibiotics between 2014 and 2019, clinicians still frequently treat resistant gram-negative infections with older, generic antibiotics with suboptimal safety-efficacy profiles. Future antibiotics with innovative mechanisms targeting untapped pathogen niches, widely available susceptibility testing, and evidence demonstrating improved outcomes in resistant infections might enhance utilization. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE U.S. Food and Drug Administration; NIH Intramural Research Program.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey R Strich
- Critical Care Medicine Department, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda; and Critical Care Medicine Branch, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Bethesda, Maryland (J.R.S., A.Mishuk, C.Y.D., A.Mansera, B.J.S., M.W., C.Y., M.N., S.W., S.S.K.)
| | - Ahmed Mishuk
- Critical Care Medicine Department, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda; and Critical Care Medicine Branch, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Bethesda, Maryland (J.R.S., A.Mishuk, C.Y.D., A.Mansera, B.J.S., M.W., C.Y., M.N., S.W., S.S.K.)
| | - Guoqing Diao
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, George Washington University, Washington, DC (G.D.)
| | - Alexander Lawandi
- Critical Care Medicine Department, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland (A.L., N.D.J.)
| | - Willy Li
- Critical Care Medicine Department, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda; and Department of Pharmacy, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland (W.L.)
| | - Cumhur Y Demirkale
- Critical Care Medicine Department, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda; and Critical Care Medicine Branch, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Bethesda, Maryland (J.R.S., A.Mishuk, C.Y.D., A.Mansera, B.J.S., M.W., C.Y., M.N., S.W., S.S.K.)
| | - Ahmed Babiker
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia (A.B.)
| | - Alex Mancera
- Critical Care Medicine Department, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda; and Critical Care Medicine Branch, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Bethesda, Maryland (J.R.S., A.Mishuk, C.Y.D., A.Mansera, B.J.S., M.W., C.Y., M.N., S.W., S.S.K.)
| | - Bruce J Swihart
- Critical Care Medicine Department, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda; and Critical Care Medicine Branch, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Bethesda, Maryland (J.R.S., A.Mishuk, C.Y.D., A.Mansera, B.J.S., M.W., C.Y., M.N., S.W., S.S.K.)
| | - Morgan Walker
- Critical Care Medicine Department, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda; and Critical Care Medicine Branch, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Bethesda, Maryland (J.R.S., A.Mishuk, C.Y.D., A.Mansera, B.J.S., M.W., C.Y., M.N., S.W., S.S.K.)
| | - Christina Yek
- Critical Care Medicine Department, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda; and Critical Care Medicine Branch, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Bethesda, Maryland (J.R.S., A.Mishuk, C.Y.D., A.Mansera, B.J.S., M.W., C.Y., M.N., S.W., S.S.K.)
| | - Maniraj Neupane
- Critical Care Medicine Department, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda; and Critical Care Medicine Branch, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Bethesda, Maryland (J.R.S., A.Mishuk, C.Y.D., A.Mansera, B.J.S., M.W., C.Y., M.N., S.W., S.S.K.)
| | - Nathaniel De Jonge
- Critical Care Medicine Department, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland (A.L., N.D.J.)
| | - Sarah Warner
- Critical Care Medicine Department, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda; and Critical Care Medicine Branch, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Bethesda, Maryland (J.R.S., A.Mishuk, C.Y.D., A.Mansera, B.J.S., M.W., C.Y., M.N., S.W., S.S.K.)
| | - Sameer S Kadri
- Critical Care Medicine Department, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda; and Critical Care Medicine Branch, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Bethesda, Maryland (J.R.S., A.Mishuk, C.Y.D., A.Mansera, B.J.S., M.W., C.Y., M.N., S.W., S.S.K.)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Outterson K, Orubu ESF, Rex J, Årdal C, Zaman MH. Patient Access in 14 High-Income Countries to New Antibacterials Approved by the US Food and Drug Administration, European Medicines Agency, Japanese Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency, or Health Canada, 2010-2020. Clin Infect Dis 2022; 74:1183-1190. [PMID: 34251436 PMCID: PMC8994582 DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciab612] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Inaccessibility of medicines in low- and middle-income countries is a frequent challenge. Yet it is typically assumed that high-income countries have complete access to the full arsenal of medicines. This study tests this assumption for new antibacterials, which are saved as a last resort in order to prevent the development of resistance, resulting in insufficient revenues to offset costs. Prior studies report only regulatory approval, missing the important lag that occurs between approval and commercial launch, although some antibiotics never launch in some countries. METHODS We identified all antibacterials approved and launched in the G7 and 7 other high-income countries in Europe for the decade beginning 1 January 2010, using quantitative methods to explore associations. RESULTS Eighteen new antibacterials were identified. The majority were accessible in only 3 countries (United States, United Kingdom, and Sweden), with the remaining 11 high-income countries having access to less than half of them. European marketing authorization did not lead to automatic European access, as 14 of the antibacterials were approved by the European Medicines Agency but many fewer were commercially launched. There was no significant difference in access between "innovative" and "noninnovative" antibacterials. Median annual sales in the first launched market (generally the United States) for these 18 antibiotics were low, $16.2M. CONCLUSIONS Patient access to new antibacterials is limited in some high-income countries including Canada, Japan, France, Germany, Italy, and Spain. With low expected sales, companies may have decided to delay or forego commercialization due to expectations of insufficient profitability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin Outterson
- Boston University School of Law, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- CARB-X, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Ebiowei S F Orubu
- Social Innovation on Drug Resistance Program, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - John Rex
- F2G Limited, Eccles, Cheshire, United Kingdom
- McGovern Medical School at The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Christine Årdal
- Antimicrobial Resistance Centre, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway
| | - Muhammad H Zaman
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Gomes NGM, Madureira-Carvalho Á, Dias-da-Silva D, Valentão P, Andrade PB. Biosynthetic versatility of marine-derived fungi on the delivery of novel antibacterial agents against priority pathogens. Biomed Pharmacother 2021; 140:111756. [PMID: 34051618 DOI: 10.1016/j.biopha.2021.111756] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2021] [Revised: 05/13/2021] [Accepted: 05/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Despite the increasing number of novel marine natural products being reported from fungi in the last three decades, to date only the broad-spectrum cephalosporin C can be tracked back as marine fungal-derived drug. Cephalosporins were isolated in the early 1940s from a strain of Acremonium chrysogenum obtained in a sample collected in sewage water in the Sardinian coast, preliminary findings allowing the discovery of cephalosporin C. Since then, bioprospection of marine fungi has been enabling the identification of several metabolites with antibacterial effects, many of which proving to be active against multi-drug resistant strains, available data suggesting also that some might fuel the pharmaceutical firepower towards some of the bacterial pathogens classified as a priority by the World Health Organization. Considering the success of their terrestrial counterparts on the discovery and development of several antibiotics that are nowadays used in the clinical setting, marine fungi obviously come into mind as producers of new prototypes to counteract antibiotic-resistant bacteria that are no longer responding to available treatments. We mainly aim to provide a snapshot on those metabolites that are likely to proceed to advanced preclinical development, not only based on their antibacterial potency, but also considering their targets and modes of action, and activity against priority pathogens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nelson G M Gomes
- REQUIMTE/LAQV, Laboratório de Farmacognosia, Departamento de Química, Faculdade de Farmácia, Universidade do Porto, R. Jorge Viterbo Ferreira, nº 228, 4050-313 Porto, Portugal.
| | - Áurea Madureira-Carvalho
- REQUIMTE/LAQV, Laboratório de Farmacognosia, Departamento de Química, Faculdade de Farmácia, Universidade do Porto, R. Jorge Viterbo Ferreira, nº 228, 4050-313 Porto, Portugal; IINFACTS-Institute of Research and Advanced Training in Health Sciences and Technologies, Department of Sciences, University Institute of Health Sciences (IUCS), CESPU, CRL, Gandra, Portugal.
| | - Diana Dias-da-Silva
- IINFACTS-Institute of Research and Advanced Training in Health Sciences and Technologies, Department of Sciences, University Institute of Health Sciences (IUCS), CESPU, CRL, Gandra, Portugal; UCIBIO, REQUIMTE, Laboratory of Toxicology, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Porto, R. Jorge Viterbo Ferreira, nº 228, 4050-313 Porto, Portugal.
| | - Patrícia Valentão
- REQUIMTE/LAQV, Laboratório de Farmacognosia, Departamento de Química, Faculdade de Farmácia, Universidade do Porto, R. Jorge Viterbo Ferreira, nº 228, 4050-313 Porto, Portugal.
| | - Paula B Andrade
- REQUIMTE/LAQV, Laboratório de Farmacognosia, Departamento de Química, Faculdade de Farmácia, Universidade do Porto, R. Jorge Viterbo Ferreira, nº 228, 4050-313 Porto, Portugal.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Vehreschild MJGT, Tacconelli E, Giske CG, Peschel A. Beyond COVID-19-a paradigm shift in infection management? THE LANCET. INFECTIOUS DISEASES 2021; 21:e117. [PMID: 33045187 PMCID: PMC7546645 DOI: 10.1016/s1473-3099(20)30789-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2020] [Accepted: 09/23/2020] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Maria J G T Vehreschild
- German Centre for Infection Research, Partner Site Bonn-Cologne, Germany; University of Cologne, Department I of Internal Medicine, Cologne, Germany; Department of Internal Medicine, Infectious Diseases, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Evelina Tacconelli
- Infectious Diseases Unit, Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, Verona University Hospital, Verona, Italy; Cluster of Excellence EXC2124 "Controlling Microbes to Fight Infections", University of Tübingen, Tübingen 72076, Germany; German Centre for Infection Research, Partner Site Tübingen, Germany
| | - Christian G Giske
- Division of Clinical Microbiology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden; Division of Clinical Microbiology, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Andreas Peschel
- Interfaculty Institute of Microbiology and Infection Medicine, University of Tübingen, Tübingen 72076, Germany; Cluster of Excellence EXC2124 "Controlling Microbes to Fight Infections", University of Tübingen, Tübingen 72076, Germany; German Centre for Infection Research, Partner Site Tübingen, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|