Epilepsy genetics and the precision medicine matrix

Ketogenic therapy towards precision medicine for brain diseases

Precision nutrition and nutrigenomics are emerging in the development of therapies for multiple diseases. The ketogenic diet (KD) is the most widely used clinical diet, providing high fat, low carbohydrate, and adequate protein. KD produces ketones and alters the metabolism of patients. Growing evidence suggests that KD has therapeutic effects in a wide range of neuronal diseases including epilepsy, neurodegeneration, cancer, and metabolic disorders. Although KD is considered to be a low-side-effect diet treatment, its therapeutic mechanism has not yet been fully elucidated. Also, its induced keto-response among different populations has not been elucidated. Understanding the ketone metabolism in health and disease is critical for the development of KD-associated therapeutics and synergistic therapy under any physiological background. Here, we review the current advances and known heterogeneity of the KD response and discuss the prospects for KD therapy from a precision nutrition perspective.

Steps to Improve Precision Medicine in Epilepsy

Precision medicine is an old concept, but it is not widely applied across human health conditions as yet. Numerous attempts have been made to apply precision medicine in epilepsy, this has been based on a better understanding of aetiological mechanisms and deconstructing disease into multiple biological subsets. The scope of precision medicine is to provide effective strategies for treating individual patients with specific agent(s) that are likely to work best based on the causal biological make-up. We provide an overview of the main applications of precision medicine in epilepsy, including the current limitations and pitfalls, and propose potential strategies for implementation and to achieve a higher rate of success in patient care. Such strategies include establishing a definition of precision medicine and its outcomes; learning from past experiences, from failures and from other fields (e.g. oncology); using appropriate precision medicine strategies (e.g. drug repurposing versus traditional drug discovery process); and using adequate methods to assess efficacy (e.g. randomised controlled trials versus alternative trial designs). Although the progress of diagnostic techniques now allows comprehensive characterisation of each individual epilepsy condition from a molecular, biological, structural and clinical perspective, there remain challenges in the integration of individual data in clinical practice to achieve effective applications of precision medicine in this domain.

Detection of Deregulated miRNAs in Childhood Epileptic Encephalopathies

The term "epileptic encephalopathy" is used to describe a possible relationship between epilepsy and developmental delay. The pathogenesis of developmental encephalopathies, independent of epilepsy, can be defined by genetic control mechanisms. The aim of this study was to investigate the use of miRNAs as serum biomarkers for the determination and discrimination of epileptic encephalopathies. Whole blood samples obtained from 54 individuals in 2 groups designated as epileptic encephalopathy patients' group (n = 24) and healthy controls (n = 30) were included in this study. The expression levels of 10 miRNAs were determined using qRT-PCR. After the determination of expression levels, the correlation of upregulated miRNA levels and Ki67 index was calculated using Pearson correlation test. The comparison of epileptic encephalopathy patients' group with healthy controls revealed the upregulation of one miRNAs (hsa-miR-324-5p) and downregulation of three miRNAs (hsa-miR-146a-5p, hsa-miR-138-5p, hsa-miR-187-3p). It has been determined that miRNAs with altered expression are an important factor in the formation of epileptic seizures and seizure-induced neuronal death. The fact that processes that play a key role in epiloptogenesis are under the control of miRNAs causes miRNAs to become meta-controllers of gene expression in the brain. We thought that further studies are needed to prove that especially hsa-miR-146a-5p, hsa-miR-138-5p, and hsa-miR-187-3p can be used as epileptic encephalopathy biomarkers. The detection of disease-specific miRNAs could contribute to the development of precision treatments.

Epilepsy Genetics and Precision Medicine in Adults: A New Landscape for Developmental and Epileptic Encephalopathies

This review aims to provide an updated perspective of epilepsy genetics and precision medicine in adult patients, with special focus on developmental and epileptic encephalopathies (DEEs), covering relevant and controversial issues, such as defining candidates for genetic testing, which genetic tests to request and how to interpret them. A literature review was conducted, including findings in the discussion and recommendations. DEEs are wide and phenotypically heterogeneous electroclinical syndromes. They generally have a pediatric presentation, but patients frequently reach adulthood still undiagnosed. Identifying the etiology is essential, because there lies the key for precision medicine. Phenotypes modify according to age, and although deep phenotyping has allowed to outline certain entities, genotype-phenotype correlations are still poor, commonly leading to long-lasting diagnostic odysseys and ineffective therapies. Recent adult series show that the target patients to be identified for genetic testing are those with epilepsy and different risk factors. The clinician should take active part in the assessment of the pathogenicity of the variants detected, especially concerning variants of uncertain significance. An accurate diagnosis implies precision medicine, meaning genetic counseling, prognosis, possible future therapies, and a reduction of iatrogeny. Up to date, there are a few tens of gene mutations with additional concrete treatments, including those with restrictive/substitutive therapies, those with therapies modifying signaling pathways, and channelopathies, that are worth to be assessed in adults. Further research is needed regarding phenotyping of adult syndromes, early diagnosis, and the development of targeted therapies.

Single-Target Versus Multi-Target Drugs Versus Combinations of Drugs With Multiple Targets: Preclinical and Clinical Evidence for the Treatment or Prevention of Epilepsy

Rationally designed multi-target drugs (also termed multimodal drugs, network therapeutics, or designed multiple ligands) have emerged as an attractive drug discovery paradigm in the last 10-20 years, as potential therapeutic solutions for diseases of complex etiology and diseases with significant drug-resistance problems. Such agents that modulate multiple targets simultaneously are developed with the aim of enhancing efficacy or improving safety relative to drugs that address only a single target or to combinations of single-target drugs. Although this strategy has been proposed for epilepsy therapy >25 years ago, to my knowledge, only one antiseizure medication (ASM), padsevonil, has been intentionally developed as a single molecular entity that could target two different mechanisms. This novel drug exhibited promising effects in numerous preclinical models of difficult-to-treat seizures. However, in a recent randomized placebo-controlled phase IIb add-on trial in treatment-resistant focal epilepsy patients, padsevonil did not separate from placebo in its primary endpoints. At about the same time, a novel ASM, cenobamate, exhibited efficacy in several randomized controlled trials in such patients that far surpassed the efficacy of any other of the newer ASMs. Yet, cenobamate was discovered purely by phenotype-based screening and its presumed dual mechanism of action was only described recently. In this review, I will survey the efficacy of single-target vs. multi-target drugs vs. combinations of drugs with multiple targets in the treatment and prevention of epilepsy. Most clinically approved ASMs already act at multiple targets, but it will be important to identify and validate new target combinations that are more effective in drug-resistant epilepsy and eventually may prevent the development or progression of epilepsy.

Real-life survey of pitfalls and successes of precision medicine in genetic epilepsies

OBJECTIVE

The term 'precision medicine' describes a rational treatment strategy tailored to one person that reverses or modifies the disease pathophysiology. In epilepsy, single case and small cohort reports document nascent precision medicine strategies in specific genetic epilepsies. The aim of this multicentre observational study was to investigate the deeper complexity of precision medicine in epilepsy.

METHODS

A systematic survey of patients with epilepsy with a molecular genetic diagnosis was conducted in six tertiary epilepsy centres including children and adults. A standardised questionnaire was used for data collection, including genetic findings and impact on clinical and therapeutic management.

RESULTS

We included 293 patients with genetic epilepsies, 137 children and 156 adults, 162 females and 131 males. Treatment changes were undertaken because of the genetic findings in 94 patients (32%), including rational precision medicine treatment and/or a treatment change prompted by the genetic diagnosis, but not directly related to known pathophysiological mechanisms. There was a rational precision medicine treatment for 56 patients (19%), and this was tried in 33/56 (59%) and was successful (ie, >50% seizure reduction) in 10/33 (30%) patients. In 73/293 (25%) patients there was a treatment change prompted by the genetic diagnosis, but not directly related to known pathophysiological mechanisms, and this was successful in 24/73 (33%).

SIGNIFICANCE

Our survey of clinical practice in specialised epilepsy centres shows high variability of clinical outcomes following the identification of a genetic cause for an epilepsy. Meaningful change in the treatment paradigm after genetic testing is not yet possible for many people with epilepsy. This systematic survey provides an overview of the current application of precision medicine in the epilepsies, and suggests the adoption of a more considered approach.

Drug Resistance in Epilepsy: Clinical Impact, Potential Mechanisms, and New Innovative Treatment Options

Epilepsy is a chronic neurologic disorder that affects over 70 million people worldwide. Despite the availability of over 20 antiseizure drugs (ASDs) for symptomatic treatment of epileptic seizures, about one-third of patients with epilepsy have seizures refractory to pharmacotherapy. Patients with such drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) have increased risks of premature death, injuries, psychosocial dysfunction, and a reduced quality of life, so development of more effective therapies is an urgent clinical need. However, the various types of epilepsy and seizures and the complex temporal patterns of refractoriness complicate the issue. Furthermore, the underlying mechanisms of DRE are not fully understood, though recent work has begun to shape our understanding more clearly. Experimental models of DRE offer opportunities to discover, characterize, and challenge putative mechanisms of drug resistance. Furthermore, such preclinical models are important in developing therapies that may overcome drug resistance. Here, we will review the current understanding of the molecular, genetic, and structural mechanisms of ASD resistance and discuss how to overcome this problem. Encouragingly, better elucidation of the pathophysiological mechanisms underpinning epilepsies and drug resistance by concerted preclinical and clinical efforts have recently enabled a revised approach to the development of more promising therapies, including numerous potential etiology-specific drugs (“precision medicine”) for severe pediatric (monogenetic) epilepsies and novel multitargeted ASDs for acquired partial epilepsies, suggesting that the long hoped-for breakthrough in therapy for as-yet ASD-resistant patients is a feasible goal.