Are drugs for multiple sclerosis fatigue just placebos?

Current perspectives on the diagnosis and management of fatigue in multiple sclerosis

INTRODUCTION

Fatigue is a common and debilitating symptom among multiple sclerosis (MS) patients with a prevalence up to 81% and with a considerable impact on quality of life. However, its subjective nature makes it difficult to define and quantify in clinical practice. Research aimed at a more precise definition and knowledge of this construct is thus continuously growing.

AREAS COVERED

This review summarizes the most relevant updates available on PubMed up to July 1^st 2022 regarding: the assessment methods that aim to measure the concept of fatigue (as opposed to fatigability), the possible treatment pathways currently available to clinicians, interconnection with the pathophysiological substrates and with the common comorbidities of MS, such as depression and mood disorders.

EXPERT OPINION

The in-depth study of fatigue can help to better understand its actual impact on MS patients and can stimulate clinicians towards a more valid approach, through a targeted analysis of this symptom. Considering fatigue from a multidimensional perspective allows the use of patient-tailored methods for its identification and subsequent treatment by different professional figures. Better identification of methods and treatment pathways would reduce the extremely negative impact of fatigue on MS patients' quality of life.

Treatment of multiple sclerosis fatigue with the synthetic psychoactive drug modafinil

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a complex disorder characterized by a broad spectrum of symptoms that evolve throughout the disease. Symptoms can be categorized as visible and invisible based on external sight recognition. However, although others poorly recognize it, invisible symptoms such as mood dysfunction, neuropathic pain, or fatigue can significantly affect activities of daily living and the quality of life of people with MS (PwMS). PwMS frequently complain of fatigue, which has physical or cognitive manifestations. Fatigue in MS does not improve or resolve with rest, and it is disproportionate with respect to the exerted effort. Fatigue management in MS is challenging, and a few pharmacological approaches have been successfully proposed. Among them, the drug modafinil has attracted attention because of its properties as a synthetic psychoactive drug. In this review, we focus on the evidence available to date, supporting the use of modafinil in MS fatigue. However, despite the availability of some trials evaluating the effects of modafinil on fatigue, their contrasting results failed to support its usefulness in fatigue management in MS.

tDCS randomized controlled trials in no-structural diseases: a quantitative review

The increasing number and quality of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) employing transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) denote the rising awareness of neuroscientific community about its electroceutical potential and opening to include these treatments in the framework of medical therapies under the indications of the international authorities. The purpose of this quantitative review is to estimate the recommendation strength applying the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) criteria and PICO (population, intervention, comparison, outcome) model values for effective tDCS treatments on no-structural diseases, and to provide an estimate of Sham effect for future RCTs. Applying GRADE evaluation pathway, we searched in literature the tDCS-based RCTs in psychophysical diseases displaying a major involvement of brain electrical activity imbalances. Three independent authors agreed on Class 1 RCTs (18 studies) and meta-analyses were carried out using a random-effects model for pathologies sub-selected based on PICO and systemic involvement criteria. The meta-analysis integrated with extensive evidence of negligible side effects and low-cost, easy-to-use procedures, indicated that tDCS treatments for depression and fatigue in Multiple Sclerosis ranked between moderately and highly recommendable. For these interventions we reported the PICO variables, with left vs. right dorsolateral prefrontal target for 30 min/10 days against depression and bilateral somatosensory vs occipital target for 15 min/5 days against MS fatigue. An across-diseases meta-analysis devoted to the Sham effect provided references for power analysis in future tDCS RCTs on these clinical conditions. High-quality indications support tDCS as a promising tool to build electroceutical treatments against diseases involving neurodynamics alterations.