Small-for-size syndrome in living donor liver transplantation

International multicenter study of ultralow graft-to-recipient weight ratio grafts in adult living donor liver transplantation

Decreasing the graft size in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) increases the risk of early allograft dysfunction. Graft-to-recipient weight ratio (GRWR) of 0.8 is considered the threshold. There is evidence that smaller volume grafts may also provide equally good outcomes, the cut-off of which remains unknown. In this retrospective multicenter study, 92 adult LDLTs with a final GRWR ≤0.6 performed at 12 international liver transplant centers over a 3-year period were included. Perioperative data including preoperative status, portal flow hemodynamics (PFH) and portal flow modulation, development of small for size syndrome (SFSS), morbidity, and mortality was collated and analyzed. Thirty-two (36.7%) patients developed SFSS and this was associated with increased 30-day, 90-day, and 1-year mortality. The preoperative model for end-stage liver disease and inpatient status were independent predictors for SFSS (P < .05). Pre-liver transplant renal dysfunction was an independent predictor of survival (hazard ratio 3.1; 95% confidence intervals 1.1, 8.9, P = .035). PFH or portal flow modulation were not predictive of SFSS or survival. We report the largest ever multicenter study of LDLT outcomes using ultralow GRWR grafts and for the first time validate the International Liver Transplantation Society-International Living donor liver transplantation study group-Liver Transplantation Society of India consensus definition and grading of SFSS. Preoperative recipient condition rather than GRWR and PFH were independent predictors of SFSS. Algorithms to predict SFSS and LT outcomes should incorporate recipient factors along with GRWR.

Normothermic Liver Machine Perfusion and Successful Transplantation of Split Liver Grafts: From Proof of Concept to Clinical Implementation

BACKGROUND

Normothermic liver machine perfusion (NLMP) is advancing the field of liver transplantation (LT). Beyond improved preservation and organ assessment, NLMP helps to increase organ utilization. We herein address the feasibility and merit of NLMP in split liver transplantation (SLT) to postpone the transplantation of the second split graft to the following day.

METHODS

We analyzed the perfusion characteristics and outcomes of all consecutive adult recipients who underwent SLT following NLMP from February 1, 2018, to June 30, 2023. The primary endpoint was 90-d graft and patient survival. Secondary endpoints were posttransplant complications and 90-d morbidity.

RESULTS

Three right and 3 extended right SLT following NLMP have been performed. NLMP was uneventful in all cases. Perfusion characteristics differed according to graft volume. Mean perfusion time was 17:00 h (±05:13) and bile production ranged between 8 and 21 mL/h. All split grafts fulfilled predefined center viability criteria during NLMP and were transplanted on the following day. The 90-d graft and patient survival rate was 100%. Three patients (50%) required an early relaparotomy, and 2 patients (33.3%) developed biliary complications. The 90-d morbidity as recorded by the comprehensive complication index was 62.7 (±24.7).

CONCLUSIONS

NLMP of split liver grafts is technically feasible and safe. Through prolongation of preservation time, NLMP allows to safely postpone transplantation of the second split liver graft to the next day.

The short- and long-term outcomes in living-donor liver transplantation using small-for-size graft: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

A standard graft-to-recipient weight ratio (GRWR) ≥0.8% is widely accepted in living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT); however, the potential donor pool is expanded to patients adopting small-for-size graft (SFSGs) with GRWR <0.8%. This study aimed to investigate the effect of SFSG on short- and long-term outcomes following LDLT.

METHODS

Electronic databases were searched from January 1995 to January 2022 for studies comparing short- or long-term outcomes between patients with SFSG (GRWR <0.8%, SFSG group) and sufficient volume graft (GRWR ≥0.8%, non-SFSG group). The primary outcomes were one-, three-, and five-year overall survival (OS) and graft survival (GS), while the secondary outcome was postoperative complications.

RESULTS

Twenty-four studies comprising 7996 patients were included. In terms of OS, SFSG group had poor three-year OS (HR: 1.48, 95% CI [1.01, 2.15], p = 0.04), but there were no significant differences between two groups in one-year OS (HR: 1.50, 95% CI [0.98, 2.29], p = 0.06) and five-year OS (HR: 1.40, 95% CI [0.95, 2.08], p = 0.02). In GS, there were no significant differences in one-year (HR 1.31, 95% CI [1.00, 1.72], p = 0.05), three-year (HR 1.33, 95% CI [0.97, 1.82], p = 0.07), and five-year GS (HR 1.17, 95% CI [0.95, 1.44], p = 0.13). The SFSG group had comparable postoperative complications, except for a high incidence of vascular complications and small-for-size syndromes.

CONCLUSIONS

Expanding the potential donor pool in LDLT to SFSG with GRWR <0.8% can be acceptable in terms of comparable long-term OS and GS, despite the risk for vascular complications and small-for-size syndrome.

Does modification of portal pressure and flow enhance recovery of the recipient after living donor liver transplantation? A systematic review of literature and expert panel recommendations

BACKGROUND

Portal inflow modulation (PIM) aimed at reducing portal hyperperfusion is commonly used in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) to reduce the risk of small-for-size syndrome (SFSS). Many different techniques, both pharmacological and surgical have been used for this purpose. There is, however, little consensus on the best method of PIM, its exact role in preventing SFSS and on early post-LDLT recovery.

OBJECTIVES

To identify whether modifications of portal pressures and flows enhance recovery after LDLT and to provide international expert panel recommendations.

DATA SOURCES

Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Central.

METHODS

Systematic review following PRISMA guidelines and recommendations using the GRADE approach derived from an international expert panel.

PROSPERO ID

CRD42021260997.

RESULTS

Five hundred and ninety four articles were identified through databases' search. Of the 24 included for a final review by the working group (WG), there were five randomized control trials, four prospective studies and 15 retrospective series. Six outcome measures which were likely to influence early recovery after LDLT, especially in small-for-size grafts (SFSG) were shortlisted. These included acute kidney injury, SFSS, morbidity including sepsis, length of ICU and hospital stay, morbidity of the PIM technique and overall mortality. The WG noted that PIM in this subset of LDLT recipients had a beneficial effect on all the outcomes measures.

CONCLUSIONS

Considering all decision domains, the panel recommends pre- and intraoperative actual graft weight validation, portal pressure/flow measurements, and a comprehensive donor evaluation for the determination of potentially small-for-size/ small-for-flow grafts as mandatory. (Quality of Evidence: Moderate | Grade of Recommendation: Strong) Pharmacological PIM helps improve early renal function in LDLT recipients. (Quality of Evidence: High | Grade of Recommendation: Strong) In selected patients with SFSG, PIM helps reduce SFSS/EAD and sepsis. (Quality of Evidence: Moderate | Grade of Recommendation: Strong) PIM in the form of splenectomy has increased morbidity compared to splenic artery ligation (SAL). (Quality of Evidence: Low | Grade of Recommendation: Strong) In LDLT recipients with SFSG, PIM may help reduce morbidity/mortality. (Quality of Evidence: Low | Grade of Recommendation: Strong) In LDLT recipients with SFSG, modification of portal pressures and flows enhances recovery after LDLT. (Quality of Evidence: Moderate | Grade of Recommendation: Strong).

HOXA13 promotes liver regeneration through regulation of BMP-7

In-depth knowledge of liver regeneration could facilitate the development of therapies for liver injury and liver failure. As a member of the homeobox superfamily, HOXA13 plays an important role in regulating tumorigenesis and development. However, the exact role of HOXA13 in liver regeneration remains unclear. In this study, we confirmed that HOXA13 promotes hepatocyte proliferation both in vivo and in vitro. HOXA13 was upregulated during liver regeneration, and its overexpression further accelerated hepatocyte proliferation and liver function recovery during liver regeneration. Furthermore, we found that HOXA13 promoted hepatocyte proliferation and liver regeneration by upregulating bone morphogenetic protein-7 (BMP-7) mRNA. These findings provide a new potential target for the treatment of liver failure.

Triphase contrast-enhanced CT to evaluate indications for autologous liver transplantation in patients with end-stage hepatic alveolar echinococcosis

Autologous liver transplantation (ALT) to cure end-stage hepatic alveolar echinococcosis (HAE) requires that hepatobiliary surgeons understand the invasion of intrahepatic structure and adjacent tissues or organs. Triphase contrast-enhanced CT of the liver has been widely used for diagnosis and preoperative evaluation of HAE. Three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction allows for accurate measurement of remnant liver volume (RLV). The objective of the study was to evaluate value of triphase contrast-enhanced CT together with 3D reconstruction in preoperative evaluation of indications for ALT in patients with end-stage HAE. This cohort include twenty-one consecutive patients with end-stage HAE, who preoperatively underwent triphase enhanced CT together with 3D reconstruction for ALT. To depict the indications, the 2D image data were reviewed statistically focusing on porta hepatis invasion, retrohepatic vena cava (RHVC) involvement and degrees of intrahepatic vessel invasion, and the 3D reconstruction was performed to obtain ratio of RLV to standard liver volume (SLV). The results showed that 95.24% patients (20/21) had porta hepatis invasion. When lesions located in right liver lobe, porta hepatis invasion occurred most commonly in the second and third porta hepatis (7/10), whereas the first, second and third porta hepatis were most commonly invaded by lesions in the right and caudate / left medial liver lobes (7/11) (P < 0.05). The mean value of longitudinal invasion of RHVC was 8.0 cm, and 95.2% (20/21) of patients had RHVC invasion with ≥ 180° circumferential invasion. As for the important vascular events, moderate and severe invasion occurred most commonly in the right hepatic vein, right branch of portal vein and RHVC each in 95.2% (20/21) patients (P < 0.05). We also found that preoperative CT had a good agreement with intraoperative findings in assessing intrahepatic vascular involvement by HAE (kappa index = 0.77). The estimated average ratio of RLV to SLV was 0.95 (range, 0.43–1.62). In conclusion, the 2D contrast-enhanced CT could well depict anatomic location and size of HAE, and invasion of porta hepatis and vascular by this disease, and involvement of other adjacent organs and tissues. Above all, 3D reconstruction could accurately measure RLV in patients with end-stage HAE for ALT.

Is 0.6% Reasonable as the Minimum Requirement of the Graft-to-recipient Weight Ratio Regardless of Lobe Selection in Adult Living-donor Liver Transplantation?

BACKGROUND

Several studies reported favorable outcomes of small-for-size grafts with graft-to-recipient weight ratio (GRWR) <0.8% in living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT). However, their indications should be carefully determined because they must have been indicated for low-risk cases over larger grafts with 0.8% ≤ GRWR. Furthermore, evidence for minimum requirements of GRWR remains inconclusive. We investigated the safety of small-for-size grafts against larger grafts by adjusting for confounding risk factors, and minimum requirement of graft volume in adult LDLT.

METHODS

We enrolled 417 cases of primary adult-to-adult LDLT in our center between 2006 and 2019. The outcomes of small grafts (0.6% ≤ GRWR < 0.8%, n = 113) and large grafts (0.8% ≤ GRWR, n = 289) were mainly compared using a multivariate analysis and Kaplan-Meier estimates.

RESULTS

The multivariate analysis showed that small grafts were not a significant risk factor for overall graft survival (GS). In the Kaplan-Meier analysis, small grafts did not significantly affect overall GS regardless of lobe selection (versus large grafts). However, GRWR < 0.6% was associated with poor overall GS. Although there were no significant differences between the 2 groups, unadjusted Kaplan-Meier curves of small grafts were inferior to those of large grafts in subcohorts with ABO incompatibility, and donor age ≥50 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Similar outcomes were observed for small and large graft use regardless of lobe selection. 0.6% in GRWR was reasonable as the minimum requirement of graft volume in LDLT. However, small grafts should be indicated carefully for high-risk cases.

Protection of liver sinusoids by intravenous administration of human Muse cells in a rat extra-small partial liver transplantation model

Small-for-size syndrome (SFSS) has a poor prognosis due to excessive shear stress and sinusoidal microcirculatory disturbances in the acute phase after living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT). Multilineage-differentiating stress enduring (Muse) cells are reparative stem cells found in various tissues and currently under clinical trials. These cells selectively home to damaged sites via the sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P)-S1P receptor 2 system and repair damaged tissue by pleiotropic effects, including tissue protection and damaged/apoptotic cell replacement by differentiating into tissue-constituent cells. The effects of intravenously administered human bone marrow-Muse cells and -mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) (4 × 105 ) on liver sinusoidal endothelial cells (LSECs) were examined in a rat SFSS model without immunosuppression. Compared with MSCs, Muse cells intensively homed to the grafted liver, distributed to the sinusoids and vessels, and delivered improved blood chemistry and Ki-67(+) proliferative hepatocytes and -LSECs within 3 days. Tissue clearing and three-dimensional imaging by multiphoton laser confocal microscopy revealed maintenance of the sinusoid continuity, organization, and surface area, as well as decreased sinusoid interruption in the Muse group. Small-interfering RNA-induced knockdown of hepatocyte growth factor and vascular endothelial growth factor-A impaired the protective effect of Muse cells on LSECs. Intravenous injection of Muse cells might be a feasible approach for LDLT with less recipient burden.

Liver Regeneration after Hepatectomy and Partial Liver Transplantation

The liver is a unique organ with an abundant regenerative capacity. Therefore, partial hepatectomy (PHx) or partial liver transplantation (PLTx) can be safely performed. Liver regeneration involves a complex network of numerous hepatotropic factors, cytokines, pathways, and transcriptional factors. Compared with liver regeneration after a viral- or drug-induced liver injury, that of post-PHx or -PLTx has several distinct features, such as hemodynamic changes in portal venous flow or pressure, tissue ischemia/hypoxia, and hemostasis/platelet activation. Although some of these changes also occur during liver regeneration after a viral- or drug-induced liver injury, they are more abrupt and drastic following PHx or PLTx, and can thus be the main trigger and driving force of liver regeneration. In this review, we first provide an overview of the molecular biology of liver regeneration post-PHx and -PLTx. Subsequently, we summarize some clinical conditions that negatively, or sometimes positively, interfere with liver regeneration after PHx or PLTx, such as marginal livers including aged or fatty liver and the influence of immunosuppression.

Small-for-size graft, small-for-size syndrome and inflow modulation in living donor liver transplantation

The extended application of living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) has revealed the problem of graft size mismatching called "small-for-size syndrome (SFSS)." The initial trials to resolve this problem involved increasing the procured graft size, from left to right, and even extending to include a right lobe graft. Clinical cases of living right lobe donations have been reported since then, drawing attention to the risks of increasing the liver volume procured from a living donor. However, not only other modes of increasing graft volume (GV) such as auxiliary or dual liver transplantation, but also control of the increased portal pressure caused by a small-for-size graft (SFSG), such as a porto-systemic shunt or splenectomy and optimal outflow reconstruction, have been trialed with some positive results. To establish an effective strategy for transplanting SFSG and preventing SFSS, it is essential to have precise knowledge and tactics to evaluate graft quality and GV, when performing these LDLTs with portal pressure control and good venous outflow. Thus, we reviewed the updated literature on the pathogenesis of and strategies for using SFSG.

Association of Graft-to-Recipient Weight Ratio with the Prognosis Following Liver Transplantation: a Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Studies indicate that low graft-to-recipient weight ratio (GRWR) affect graft survival in adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation. However, the potential role of GRWR in the prognosis of patients following living donor liver transplantation according to patient characteristics remains controversial. This study aimed to update the role of GRWR in patients following living donor liver transplantation.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were comprehensively searched for studies comparing low GRWR (< 0.8%) with normal GRWR (≥ 0.8%) in the prognosis following living donor liver transplantation from inception to March 2019. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year summary survival rates, small-for-size syndrome (SFSS), perioperative mortality, biliary complications, postoperative bleeding, and acute rejection were calculated using the random-effects model.

RESULTS

Eighteen studies comprising 4001 patients were included. Patients with low GRWR were associated with lower 1-year and 3-year survival rates compared to patients with normal GRWR, while no significant difference was found in the association of 5-year survival rate with low and normal GRWRs. Moreover, the risk of SFSS significantly increased in patients with low GRWR. Finally, no significant differences were observed in the association of low and normal GRWRs with the risk of perioperative mortality, biliary complications, postoperative bleeding, and acute rejection.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study indicated that low GRWR was associated with poor prognosis for patients following living donor liver transplantation, especially in terms of 1- and 3-year survival rates and SFSS.

Post-transplant inflow modulation for early allograft dysfunction after living donor liver transplantation

Background

To treat small-for-size syndrome (SFSS) after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT), many procedures were described for portal flow modulation before, during, or after transplantation. The selection of the procedure as well as the best timing remains controversial.

Case presentation

A 43-year-old female with end-stage liver disease underwent LDLT with extended left with caudate lobe graft from her donor who was her 41-year-old brother (graft volume/standard liver volume (GV/SLV), 35.7%; graft to recipient weight ratio (GRWR), 0.67%). During the surgery, splenectomy could not be performed owing to severe peri-splenic adhesions to avoid the ruined bleedings. The splenic artery ligation was not also completely done because it was dorsal to the pancreas and difficult to be approached. Finally, adequate portal vein (PV) inflow was confirmed after portal venous thrombectomy. As having post-transplant optional procedures that are accessible for PV flow modulation, any other procedures for PV modulation during LDLT were not done until the postoperative assessment of the graft function and PV flow for possible postoperative modulation of the portal flow accordingly. Postoperative PV flow kept as high as 30 cm/s. By the end of the 1st week, there was a progressive deterioration of the total bilirubin profile (peak as 19.4 mg/dL) and ascitic fluid amount exceeded 1000 mL/day. Therefore, splenic artery embolization was done effectively and safely on the 10th postoperative day (POD) to reverse early allograft dysfunction as PV flow significantly decreased to keep within 20 cm/s and serum total bilirubin levels gradually declined with decreased amounts of ascites below 500 mL on POD 11 and thereafter. The patient was discharged on POD 28 with good condition.

Conclusions

SFSS can be prevented or reversed by the portal inflow modulation, even by post-transplant procedure. This case emphasizes that keeping accessible angiographic treatment options for PV modulation, such as splenic artery embolization, after LDLT is quite feasible.

The Impact of Biliary Reconstruction Methods on Small Partial Liver Grafts

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

Graft recipient weight ratios are lower in adult-to-adult living-donor liver transplantation than in adult-to-adult deceased-donor liver transplantation. Rapid liver regeneration is essential for increased recipient survival rates in adult-to-adult living-donor liver transplantation. However, the influence of biliary reconstruction methods, including choledocho-choledochostomy and choledocho-jejunostomy, on small partial liver grafts remains unknown. Herein, we investigate the impact of these biliary reconstruction methods on small partial liver grafts.

Conceptual changes in small-for-size graft and small-for-size syndrome in living donor liver transplantation

Early series in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) in adults demonstrated a lower safe limit of graft volume standard liver volume ratio 25%–45%. A subsequent worldwide large LDLT series proposed a 0.8 graft recipient weight ratio (GRWR) to define small-for-size graft (SFSG) in adult LDLT. Thereafter, researchers identified innate and inevitable factors including changes in liver volume during imaging studies and graft shrinkage due to perfusion solution. Although the definition of small-for-size syndrome (SFSS) advocated in the 2000s was mainly based on prolonged cholestasis and ascites output, the term SFSS was inadequate to describe clinical manifestations possibly caused by multiple factors. Thus, the term “early allograft dysfunction (EAD),” characterized by total bilirubin >10 mg/dL or coagulopathy with international normalized ratio >1.6 on day 7, has become prevalent to describe graft dysfunction including SFSS after LDLT. Although various efforts have been made to overcome EAD in LDLT, graft selection to maintain an expected GRWR >0.8 and full venous drainage, as well as inflow modulation using splenic artery ligation, have become standard in recent LDLT.

Is Portal Inflow Modulation Always Necessary for Successful Utilization of Small Volume Living Donor Liver Grafts?

Although the well-accepted lower limit of the graft-to-recipient weight ratio (GRWR) for successful living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) remains 0.80%, many believe grafts with lower GRWR may suffice with portal inflow modulation (PIM), resulting in equally good recipient outcomes. This study was done to evaluate the outcomes of LDLT with small-for-size grafts (GRWR <0.80%). Of 1321 consecutive adult LDLTs from January 2012 to December 2017, 287 (21.7%) had GRWR <0.80%. PIM was performed (hemiportocaval shunt [HPCS], n = 109; splenic artery ligation [SAL], n = 14) in 42.9% patients. No PIM was done if portal pressure (PP) in the dissection phase was <16 mm Hg. Mean age of the cohort was 49.3 ± 9.1 years. Median Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score was 14, and the lowest GRWR was 0.54%. A total of 72 recipients had a GRWR <0.70%, of whom 58 underwent HPCS (1 of whom underwent HPCS + SAL) and 14 underwent no PIM, whereas 215 had GRWR between 0.70% and 0.79%, of whom 51 and 14 underwent HPCS and SAL, respectively. During the same period, 1034 had GRWR ≥0.80% and did not undergo PIM. Small-for-size syndrome developed in 2.8% patients. Three patients needed shunt closure at 1 and 4 weeks and 60 months. The 1-year patient survival rates were comparable. In conclusion, with PIM protocol that optimizes postperfusion PP, low-GRWR grafts can be used for appropriately selected LDLT recipients with acceptable outcomes.

Dual graft living donor liver transplantation - a case report

Background

Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) has emerged as an equally viable option to deceased donor liver transplant for treating end stage liver disease patients. Optimising the recipient outcome without compromising donor safety is the primary goal of LDLT. Achieving the adequate graft to recipient weight ratio (GRWR) is important to prevent small for size syndrome which is an uncommon but potentially lethal complication of LDLT.

Case presentation

Here we describe a case of successful dual lobe liver transplant for a 32 years old patient with ethanol related end stage liver disease. A right lobe graft without middle hepatic vein and another left lateral sector graft were transplanted successfully. Recipient and both donors recovered uneventfully.

Conclusion

Dual lobe liver transplant is a feasible strategy to achieve adequate GRWR without compromising donor safety.

Older Donor Age Is a Risk Factor for Negative Outcomes After Adult Living Donor Liver Transplantation Using Small-for-Size Grafts

Adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation (ALDLT) using small-for-size grafts (SFSGs), ie, a graft with a graft-to-recipient weight ratio (GRWR) <0.8%, has been a challenge that should be carefully dealt with, and risk factors in this category are unclear. Therefore, we aimed to examine the risk factors and outcomes of ALDLT using SFSGs over a 13-year period in 121 patients who had undergone their first ALDLT using SFSGs. Small-for-size syndrome (SFSS), early graft loss, and 1-year mortality were encountered in 21.6%, 14.9%, and 18.4% of patients, respectively. By multivariate analysis, older donor age (≥45 years) was an independent risk factor for SFSS (odds ratio [OR], 4.46; P = 0.004), early graft loss (OR, 4.11; P = 0.02), and 1-year mortality (OR, 3.76; P = 0.02). Child-Pugh C class recipients were associated with a higher risk of SFSS development (P = 0.013; OR, 7.44). Despite no significant difference between GRWR categories in the multivariate outcome analysis of the whole population, in the survival analysis of the 2 donor age groups, GRWR <0.6% was associated with significantly lower 1-year survival than the other GRWR categories in the younger donor group. Moreover, in the high final portal venous pressure (PVP) group (>15 mm Hg), younger ABO-compatible donors showed 100% 1-year survival with a significant difference from the group of other donors. Older donor age was an independent risk factor for SFSS, early graft loss, and 1-year mortality after ALDLT using SFSGs. GRWR should not be <0.6%, and PVP modulation is indicated when grafts from older or ABO-incompatible donors are used.

Impact of small-for-size liver grafts on medium-term and long-term graft survival in living donor liver transplantation: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Small-for-size grafts (SFSGs) in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) could optimize donor postoperative outcomes and also expand the potential donor pool. Evidence on whether SFSGs would affect medium-term and long-term recipient graft survival is lacking.

AIM

To evaluate the impact of small-for-size liver grafts on medium-term and long-term graft survival in adult to adult LDLT.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed by searching eligible studies published before January 24, 2019 on PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases. The primary outcomes were 3-year and 5-year graft survival. Incidence of small-for-size syndrome and short term mortality were also extracted.

RESULTS

This meta-analysis is reported according to the guidelines of the PRISMA 2009 Statement. Seven retrospective observational studies with a total of 1821 LDLT recipients were included in the meta-analysis. SFSG is associated with significantly poorer medium-term graft survival. The pooled odds ratio for 3-year graft survival was 1.58 [95% confidence interval 1.10-2.29, P = 0.014]. On the other hand, pooled results of the studies showed that SFSG had no significant discriminatory effect on 5-year graft survival with an odds ratio of 1.31 (95% confidence interval 0.87-1.97, P = 0.199). Furthermore, incidence of small-for-size syndrome detected in recipients of SFSG ranged from 0-11.4% in the included studies.

CONCLUSION

SFSG is associated with inferior medium-term but not long-term graft survival. Comparable long-term graft survival based on liver graft size shows that smaller grafts could be accepted for LDLT with appropriate flow modulatory measures. Close follow-up for graft function is warranted within 3 years after liver transplantation.

Impact of Graft Quality and Fluid Overload on Postoperative Massive Ascites After Living Donor Liver Transplantation

After living donor liver transplantation, we encounter cases with massive ascites, which is difficult to manage. We analyzed the risk factors for massive ascites after living donor liver transplantation. The subjects were 100 adult recipients who underwent living donor liver transplantation at Kyoto University Hospital from 2013 to 2017. We retrospectively assessed patient, graft, operative factors, and percent fluid overload, which were defined as [(weight on the day - preoperative weight)/preoperative weight] × 100%. We defined the massive ascites group as having a14-day average ascites ≥ 2500 mL and the mild ascites group as having a 14-day average ascites < 2500 mL. Forty-seven patients were included in the massive group, and 53 patients were included in the mild group. There was no difference in short- and long-term survival. In multivariate analysis, the presence of preoperative ascites (P = .0008), 14-day average percent fluid overload ≥ 14.5% (P = .0095), graft-to-recipient weight ratio < 0.86 (P = .0253), and donors' age ≥ 47 years (P = .0466) were identified as independent risk factors for massive ascites after living donor liver transplantation. A liver graft with a small graft-to-recipient weight ratio or from an elderly donor, which may indicate poor graft quality, presence of preoperative ascites, and postoperative fluid overload were associated with massive ascites after living donor liver transplantation.

Dicer1 facilitates liver regeneration in a manner dependent on the inhibitory effect of miR-21 on Pten and Rhob expression

AIMS

Tamoxifen-induced liver-specific Dicer1 deletion (iDicer1^-/-) in mature mice may provide clues demonstrating the genuine effects of acute loss of Dicer1 and miRNAs in the liver regeneration process.

MAIN METHODS

In this study, mice with tamoxifen-induced Dicer1 deletion through the Cre/LoxP system were constructed and then underwent classic 70% partial hepatectomy or CCl4-induced liver injury. To rescue the inhibitory effect of Dicer1 ablation on liver regeneration, miR-21 agomir was injected into the tail vein of iDicer1^-/- mice.

KEY FINDINGS

Unlike constitutive embryonic deletion of Dicer1, tamoxifen-induced Dicer1 deletion did not result in severe liver injury or lesions, providing an ideal model for investigating acute loss of Dicer1 and miRNAs in liver regeneration. Dicer1 deletion led to impaired liver regeneration through the inhibitory effect of miR-21 on PTEN and Rhob expression.

SIGNIFICANCE

In our previous study, we found that embryonic loss of Dicer1 impairs hepatocyte survival and leads to chronic inflammation and progenitor cell activation, while the role of Dicer1 in liver regeneration remains largely unknown. We clearly identified the promotion effect of Dicer1 on liver regeneration by increasing miR-21 expression, which inhibits the expression of two negative cell proliferation regulators, Pten and Rhob.

Coexistence of Bilirubin ≥10 mg/dL and Prothrombin Time-International Normalized Ratio ≥1.6 on Day 7: A Strong Predictor of Early Graft Loss After Living Donor Liver Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Early allograft dysfunction (EAD) defined by serum total bilirubin (TB) of 10 mg/dL or greater or prothrombin time-international normalized ratio (PT-INR) of 1.6 or greater on postoperative day 7 (POD 7) or aminotransferase greater than 2000 IU/L within the first week, is associated with early graft loss after deceased-donor liver transplantation. We aimed to determine the prognostic impact of the EAD definition in living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT).

METHODS

We analyzed the validity of the EAD definition and its impact on early graft survival in 260 adult recipients who underwent primary LDLT.

RESULTS

Eighty-four (32.3%) patients met the EAD criteria; 59 (22.7%) and 46 (17.7%) patients had TB of 10 mg/dL or greater and PT-INR of 1.6 or greater on POD 7, respectively, and 22 (8.5%) patients satisfied both criteria. Graft survival differed significantly when stratified according to TB of 10 mg/dL or greater and PT-INR of 1.6 or greater (P < 0.0001). PT-INR of 1.6 or greater resulted in higher graft mortality (risk ratio [RR], 3.87; P < 0.0001 at 90 days; RR, 2.97; P < 0.0001 at 180 days), as did TB of 10 mg/dL or greater (RR, 1.89; P = 0.027 at 90 days; RR, 1.91; P = 0.006 at 180 days). Coexistence of TB of 10 mg/dL or greater and PT-INR of 1.6 or greater was strongly associated with early graft loss (59.1%, RR, 6.97 at 90 days; 68.2%; RR, 5.75 at 180 days). In Cox regression analysis, PT-INR of 1.6 or greater and TB of 10 mg/dL or greater on POD 7 were significant risk factors for early graft loss (hazard ratio, 4.10; 95% confidence interval, 2.35-7.18; P < 0.0001, and hazard ratio, 2.43; 95% confidence interval, 1.39-4.24; P = 0.0018, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

TB of 10 mg/dL or greater and/or PT-INR of 1.6 or greater on POD 7 predicted early graft loss after LDLT, and their coexistence worsened patient outcomes.

Survival Outcomes in Split Compared With Whole Liver Transplantation

Split-liver transplantation (SLT) should be cautiously considered because the right trisection (RTS) graft can be a marginal graft in adult recipients. Herein, we analyzed the outcomes of RTS-SLT in Korea, where >75% of adult liver transplantations are performed with living donor liver transplantation. Among 2462 patients who underwent deceased donor liver transplantations (DDLTs) from 2005 to 2014, we retrospectively reviewed 86 (3.5%) adult patients who received a RTS graft (RTS-SLT group). The outcomes of the RTS-SLT group were compared with those of 303 recipients of whole liver (WL; WL-DDLT group). Recipient age, laboratory Model for End-Stage-Liver Disease (L-MELD) score, ischemia time, and donor-to-recipient weight ratio (DRWR) were not different between the 2 groups (P > 0.05). However, malignancy was uncommon (4.7% versus 36.3%), and the donor was younger (25.2 versus 42.7 years) in the RST-SLT group than in the WL-DDLT group (P < 0.05). The technical complication rates and the 5-year graft survival rates (89.0% versus 92.8%) were not different between the 2 groups (P > 0.05). The 5-year overall survival (OS) rate (63.1%) and graft-failure-free survival rate (63.1%) of the RTS-SLT group were worse than that of the WL-DDLT group (79.3% and 79.3%; P < 0.05). The factors affecting graft survival rates were not definite. However, the factors affecting OS in the RTS-SLT group were L-MELD score >30 and DRWR ≤1.0. In the subgroup analysis, OS was not different between the 2 groups if the DRWR was >1.0, regardless of the L-MELD score (P > 0.05). In conclusion, a sufficient volume of the graft estimated from DRWR-matching could lead to better outcomes of adult SLTs with a RTS graft, even in patients with high L-MELD scores.

Impact of Functional Hepatic Venous Outflow Obstruction on Perioperative Outcome After Living-Donor Liver Transplant

OBJECTIVES

An optimal initial graft function after living-donor liver transplant depends on optimal graft hemodynamics. Nonmechanical impediments to free hepatic venous outflow, due to elevated central venous pressure, may obstruct the "functional" hepatic venous outflow. Here, we evaluated whether central venous pressure affected early graft function and outcomes in adult living-donor liver transplant recipients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This prospective observational study included 61 living-donor liver transplant recipients without technical complications who received transplants from August 2013 to November 2014. Hemodynamic variables were measured preoperatively, at anhepatic phase, 30 minutes postreperfusion, at end of surgery, and during postoperative days 1-5.

RESULTS

Patients with high central venous pressure showed functional hepatic venous outflow obstruction, which caused delayed recovery of graft function. Although postoperative central venous pressure was the only identified independent risk factor for mortality, all 5 deaths in our study group occurred in those who had high central venous pressure at the anhepatic, postreperfusion, end of surgery, and postoperative phases. A postoperative central venous pressure value of ~11 mm Hg was determined to be the cutoff for high-risk mortality, with area under the curve of 0.859 (sensitivity of 80%, specificity of 68%). Increased central venous pressure was associated with increased portal venous pressure (increase of 45%, range, 28%-89%; P = .001). Central venous pressure at end of surgery (r = 0.45, P ≤ .001) and at posttransplant time points (r = 0.29, P = .02) correlated well with portal venous pressure at end of surgery. Other risk factors for early allograft dysfunction were Model for End-Stage Liver Disease and cardiac output posttransplant.

CONCLUSIONS

High central venous pressure, modulating portal venous pressure, can result in functional hepatic venous outflow obstruction, causing delayed graft function recovery and increased risk of mortality. Maintaining a central venous pressure below 11 mm Hg is beneficial.

Hepatic stimulator substance resists hepatic ischemia/reperfusion injury by regulating Drp1 translocation and activation

Ischemia/reperfusion injury, induced by abnormal mitochondrial fission-related apoptosis, is a major concern in liver transplantation settings. Our previous studies have demonstrated that hepatic stimulator substance (HSS) is an antiapoptotic effector and could protect liver from ischemia/reperfusion injury. However, the underlying mechanism remains unclear. In the present study, we report that in vitro and in vivo HSS could regulate mitochondrial fission and hepatocyte apoptosis during liver ischemia/reperfusion injury by orchestrating the translocation and activation of dynamin-related protein 1 (Drp1). Using a mouse model of ischemia/reperfusion-induced liver injury, we found that HSS-haploinsufficient (HSS^+/- ) mice displayed exacerbated liver damage based on their increased serum aminotransferase levels, cell structural destruction, and apoptosis levels compared to wild-type (HSS^+/+ ) littermates. Disruption of HSS markedly increased cyclin-dependent kinase 1 (CDK1) and Bax expression, accompanied by elevated phosphorylated Drp1 and release of cytochrome c. In parallel in vitro studies, we found that HSS could inhibit the expression of CDK1 and that HSS inhibits hepatocyte apoptosis through its suppression of CDK1/cyclin B-mediated phosphorylation at Ser-616 of Drp1, thereby decreasing Drp1 accumulation in mitochondria and Drp1-mediated activation of the mitochondrial fission program. On the contrary, knockdown of HSS increased CDK1 as well as Drp1 phosphorylation and aggravated hepatocellular apoptosis. Mechanistic investigation showed that HSS was able to reduce the stability and translation of CDK1 mRNA by modulating the expression of several microRNAs (miRs), including miR-410-3p, miR-490-3p, and miR-582-5p.

CONCLUSION

Our data reveal a novel mechanism for HSS in regulating the mitochondrial fission machinery and further suggest that modulation of HSS may provide a therapeutic approach for combating liver damage. (Hepatology 2017;66:1989-2001).

Small for size syndrome difficult dilemma: Lessons from 10 years single centre experience in living donor liver transplantation

AIM

To analyze the incidence, risk factors, prevention, treatment and outcome of small for size syndrome (SFSS) after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT).

METHODS

Through-out more than 10 years: During the period from April 2003 to the end of 2013, 174 adult-to-adults LDLT (A-ALDLT) had been performed at National Liver Institute, Menoufiya University, Shibin Elkoom, Egypt. We collected the data of those patients to do this cohort study that is a single-institution retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected database analyzing the incidence, risk factors, prevention, treatment and outcome of SFSS in a period started from the end of 2013 to the end of 2015. The median period of follow-up reached 40.50 m, range (0-144 m).

RESULTS

SFSS was diagnosed in 20 (11.5%) of our recipients. While extra-small graft [small for size graft (SFSG)], portal hypertension, steatosis and left lobe graft were significant predictors of SFSS in univariate analysis (P = 0.00, 0.04, 0.03, and 0.00 respectively); graft size was the only independent predictor of SFSS on multivariate analysis (P = 0.03). On the other hand, there was lower incidence of SFSS in patients with SFSG who underwent splenectomy [4/10 (40%) SFSS vs 3/7 (42.9%) no SFSS] but without statistical significance, However, there was none significant lower incidence of the syndrome in patients with right lobe (RL) graft when drainage of the right anterior and/or posterior liver sectors by middle hepatic vein, V5, V8, and/or right inferior vein was done [4/10 (28.6%) SFSS vs 52/152 (34.2%) no SFSS]. The 6-mo, 1-, 3-, 5-, 7- and 10-year survival in patients with SFSS were 30%, 30%, 25%, 25%, 25% and 25% respectively, while, the 6-mo, 1-, 3-, 5-, 7- and 10-year survival in patients without SFSS were 70.1%, 65.6%, 61.7%, 61%, 59.7%, and 59.7% respectively, with statistical significant difference (P = 0.00).

CONCLUSION

SFSG is the independent and main factor for occurrence of SFSS after A-ALDLT leading to poor outcome. However, the management of this catastrophe depends upon its prevention (i.e., selecting graft with proper size, splenectomy to decrease portal venous inflow, and improving hepatic vein outflow by reconstructing large draining veins of the graft).

The error analysis of Lobular and segmental division of right liver by volume measurement

The aim of this study is to explore the inconsistencies between right liver volume as measured by imaging and the actual anatomical appearance of the right lobe. Five healthy donated livers were studied. The liver slices were obtained with hepatic segments multicolor-infused through the portal vein. In the slices, the lobes were divided by two methods: radiological landmarks and real anatomical boundaries. The areas of the right anterior lobe (RAL) and right posterior lobe (RPL) on each slice were measured using Photoshop CS5 and AutoCAD, and the volumes of the two lobes were calculated. There was no statistically significant difference between the volumes of the RAL or RPL as measured by the radiological landmarks (RL) and anatomical boundaries (AB) methods. However, the curves of the square error value of the RAL and RPL measured using CT showed that the three lowest points were at the cranial, intermediate, and caudal levels. The U- or V-shaped curves of the square error rate of the RAL and RPL revealed that the lowest value is at the intermediate level and the highest at the cranial and caudal levels. On CT images, less accurate landmarks were used to divide the RAL and RPL at the cranial and caudal layers. The measured volumes of hepatic segments VIII and VI would be less than their true values, and the measured volumes of hepatic segments VII and V would be greater than their true values, according to radiological landmarks. Clin. Anat. 30:585-590, 2017. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Update on the Mechanisms of Liver Regeneration

Liver possesses many critical functions such as synthesis, detoxification, and metabolism. It continually receives nutrient-rich blood from gut, which incidentally is also toxin-rich. That may be why liver is uniquely bestowed with a capacity to regenerate. A commonly studied procedure to understand the cellular and molecular basis of liver regeneration is that of surgical resection. Removal of two-thirds of the liver in rodents or patients instigates alterations in hepatic homeostasis, which are sensed by the deficient organ to drive the restoration process. Although the exact mechanisms that initiate regeneration are unknown, alterations in hemodynamics and metabolism have been suspected as important effectors. Key signaling pathways are activated that drive cell proliferation in various hepatic cell types through autocrine and paracrine mechanisms. Once the prehepatectomy mass is regained, the process of regeneration is adequately terminated. This review highlights recent discoveries in the cellular and molecular basis of liver regeneration.

Impact of Portal Hemodynamic Changes in Partial Liver Grafts on Short-Term Graft Regeneration in Living Donor Liver Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Regeneration of partial liver grafts is critical for successful living donor liver transplantation (LDLT), especially in adult recipients. The purpose of this study was to investigate the intraoperative hemodynamic changes in partial liver grafts and characterize their potential impact on post-transplant liver regeneration in LDLT.

METHODS

We examined the portal venous flow (PVF) and hepatic arterial flow (HAF) to partial liver grafts by means of ultrasonic transit time flowmeter of donors immediately before graft retrieval and of the corresponding recipients after vascular reconstruction in 48 LDLT cases. We evaluated post-transplant liver regeneration according to the changes in graft liver volume between the time of transplantation and the 7th post-transplant day.

RESULTS

There was a significant increase in PVF to the partial liver grafts in recipients (rPVF) compared with that in donors. In contrast, graft HAF in recipients significantly decreased compared with that in donors. The rPVF inversely correlated with graft weight (GW)-recipient body weight ratio (GRWR), whereas HAF volume showed no significant correlation. The rPVF/GW positively correlated with the rate of liver regeneration (GRR), which inversely correlated with GRWR. The rPVF/GW was significantly higher, and GRR tended to be larger in the small graft group than in the non-small graft group.

CONCLUSIONS

Intraoperative portal hemodynamic changes in partial liver grafts strongly affect their post-transplant regeneration. In particular, in small liver grafts, an immediate and remarkable increase in graft PVF may contribute to rapid liver regeneration after LDLT if the increased PVF remains within a safe range.

Graft inflow modulation in adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation: A systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Small-for-size syndrome (SFSS) has an incidence between 0 and 43% in small-for-size graft (SFSG) adult living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). Portal hypertension following reperfusion and the hyperdynamic splanchnic state are reported as the major triggering factors of SFSS. Intra- and postoperative strategies to prevent or to reduce its onset are still under debate. We analyzed graft inflow modulation (GIM) during adult LDLT considering the indications, efficacy of the available techniques, changes in hemodynamics and outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed using PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus and the Cochrane Library Central. Treatment outcomes including in-hospital mortality and morbidity, re-transplantation rate, 1-, 3-, and 5-year patient overall survival and 1-, 3-, and 5-year graft survival rates, hepatic artery and portal vein flows and pressures before and after inflow modulation were analyzed.

RESULTS

From 563 articles, 12 studies dated between 2003 and 2014 fulfilled the selection criteria and were therefore included in the study. These comprised a total of 449 adult patients who underwent inflow modulation during adult-to-adult LDLT. Types of GIM described were splenic artery ligation, splenectomy, meso-caval shunt, spleno-renal shunt, portocaval shunt, and splenic artery embolization. Mortality and morbidity ranged between 0 and 33% and 17% and 70%, respectively. Re-transplantation rates ranged between 0% and 25%. GIM was associated with good survival for both graft and recipients, reaching an 84% actuarial rate at 5 years. Through the use of GIM, irrespective of the technique, a statistically significant reduction of PVF and PVP was obtained.

CONCLUSIONS

GIM is a safe and efficient technique to avoid or limit portal hyperperfusion, especially in cases of SFSG, decreasing overall morbidity and improving outcomes.

Living donor liver transplantation using dual grafts: Experience and lessons learned from cases worldwide

In living donor liver transplantation (LDLT), insufficient graft volume could result in small-for-size syndrome in recipients, whereas major liver donation predisposes the donor to a high risk of posthepatectomy liver failure. Dual graft LDLT is therefore introduced to obtain combined graft sufficiency. To date, 367 patients have been reported worldwide. We reviewed all the relevant literature, with a special focus on 43 case reports containing enough data to extract and analyze. A simple decision-making algorithm was developed. Dual graft LDLT is indicated when (1) a single donation is unacceptable due to graft-to-recipient size mismatch; (2) the future liver remnant is insufficient in the single donor after major resection; or (3) there is a significant underlying disorder or anatomical variation within the donor liver. The outcome of dual graft LDLT is reported to be comparable with that of single donor LDLT. Unilateral graft atrophy was found in 7 of the 43 patients, predominantly in the right-sided, heterotopic and initially smaller grafts. Technically, the heterotopic implantation and complex vascular reconstruction are the most demanding. Elaborate surgical planning and modification are needed. Ethical concerns about involving a second living donor need to be addressed. In conclusion, dual graft LDLT should be prudently performed in select cases by surgeons of proven expertise when single donation is unacceptable and a second living donor is available. The decision-making criteria need to be standardized. More surgical modification and clinical research are needed.

Engineering point of view on liver transplantation strategies: multi-level modeling of hepatic perfusion

BACKGROUND

Hepatic perfusion plays a crucial role in liver transplantation strategies, for example, when preserving procured organs with the use of machine perfusion preservation (MP) and in the case of living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). Liver hemodynamics are not yet fully understood because of insufficient knowledge on the hepatic vascular morphology and its perfusion characteristics, hampering the optimization of liver transplantation procedures. To this end, we developed computer models to simulate the complex blood circulation through the liver from the macro-scale down to the terminal micro-scale level.

METHODS

A combination of state-of-the-art techniques (vascular corrosion casting, micro-CT scanning up to a 2.6-μm resolution, and image processing) led to 3D visualizations and detailed geometrical analyses of the complex architecture of the liver's 3 vascular trees, ranging from the largest vessels (macrocirculation) down to the sinusoids (microcirculation).

RESULTS

On the basis of these data, we developed various computational models (electrical analog models and 3D computational fluid dynamics models) to study the blood flow-induced forces acting on the hepatic blood vessels. The latter was done for physiological blood flow through the liver as well as for livers undergoing MP or LDLT procedures. Hereby, several scenarios were simulated to study the behavior of livers in different hemodynamic circumstances.

CONCLUSIONS

A novel, multi-level modeling framework was developed to simulate hepatic perfusion in support of liver transplantation strategies. We obtained unique anatomical data on the vascular architecture of both human and rat livers. These data formed the building blocks of electrical analog models of hepatic perfusion and numerical models of the liver microcirculation. The results revealed novel insights into the hemodynamic impact of liver MP and LDLT procedures as well as into the microcirculatory perfusion characteristics. The presented methodology is also applicable to other tree-like structures (eg, the biliary tree) or organs (eg, kidneys, lungs).

Application of a Three-Dimensional Reconstruction Technique in Liver Autotransplantation for End-Stage Hepatic Alveolar Echinococcosis

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to determine the clinical value of three-dimensional (3D) computer reconstruction technology in pre-operative assessment and surgical planning for liver autotransplantation in patients with end-stage hepatic alveolar echinococcosis (HAE).

STUDY DESIGN

Fifteen end-stage HAE patients received surgical treatment in our hospital between May 2011 and July 2014. 3D reconstruction and virtual surgeries were performed on diseased livers using a 3D reconstruction system for liver (IQQA-Liver). The feasibility and safety of liver autotransplantation were assessed for successful implementation of surgery. The results were compared with intraoperative conditions and computed tomography (CT) to verify the accuracy of pre-operative evaluation.

RESULTS

Fifteen patients underwent liver resections and liver autotransplantation using surgical strategies consistent with pre-operative surgical planning in 3D reconstruction. Furthermore, there was no significant difference between whole-liver volume (2848.26 ± 798.41 vs. 2598.70 ± 822.45 cm(3), t = -4.635, P > 0.05) and lesion volume (1159.09 ± 789.47 vs. 1213.14 ± 813.76 cm(3), t = -1.959, P > 0.05) measured by 3D and traditional two-dimensional (2D) manual tracing from CT. The remaining liver volumes calculated by 3D and 2D CT were 810.47 ± 214.05 and 892.00 ± 262.36 cm(3) (t = -3.275, P > 0.05), with an average error rate of 6.2 and 16.5%, respectively. The pre-operative remaining liver volumes estimated by the two methods were positively correlated with the actual weight (783.67 ± 217.74 g) after the surgery (r three-dimensional = 0.976, r multislice CT = 0.883, P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

An individualized liver reconstruction technique can provide comprehensive anatomic information on livers of patients with end-stage HAE. Pre-operative virtual surgery can effectively improve the success rate of liver autotransplantation and reduce the risks of surgery.

Cilostazol improves hepatic blood perfusion, microcirculation, and liver regeneration after major hepatectomy in rats

Major hepatectomy or small-for-size liver transplantation may result in postoperative liver failure. So far, no treatment is available to improve liver regeneration. Herein, we studied whether cilostazol, a selective phosphodiesterase III inhibitor, is capable of improving liver regeneration after major hepatectomy. Sprague-Dawley rats (n = 74) were treated with cilostazol (5 mg/kg daily) or a glucose solution and underwent either 70% liver resection or a sham operation. Before and after surgery, hepatic arterial and portal venous blood flow and hepatic microvascular perfusion were analyzed. Liver morphology, function, and regeneration were studied with histology, immunohistochemistry, western blotting, and bile excretion analysis. Cilostazol significantly increased hepatic blood flow and microcirculation before and after hepatectomy in comparison with sham-operated controls. This was associated with an elevation of hepatic vascular endothelial growth factor expression, an increase of hepatocellular proliferation, and an acceleration of liver regeneration. Furthermore, cilostazol protected the tissue of the remnant liver as indicated by an attenuation of hepatocellular disintegration. In conclusion, cilostazol increases hepatic blood perfusion, microcirculation, and liver regeneration after a major hepatectomy. Thus, cilostazol may represent a novel strategy to reduce the rate of liver failure after both extended hepatectomy and small-for-size liver transplantation.

Complications and mortality after adult to adult living donor liver transplantation: A retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is widely performed for patients to resolve the critical shortage of organs from cadavers. Despite rapid implementation of the procedure, both complications and mortality of LDLT are annoying problems. The aim of this study was to analyze complications and mortality of patients after adult to adult LDLT (A-ALDLT) in a single center.

METHODS

Between April 2003 and November 2013, 167 (A-ALDLT) recipients in National Liver Institute, Egypt were included. We retrospectively analyzed complications and mortality in them.

RESULTS

The overall incidence of complications was 86.2% (n = 144) and classified as biliary 43.7% (n = 73), vascular 21.6% (n = 36), Small for size syndrome (SFSS) 12.6% (n = 21), Gastrointestinal tract (GIT) 19.8% (n = 33), wound 12.6% (n = 21), chest 19.8% (n = 33), neurological 26.3% (n = 44), renal 21% (n = 35), intra abdominal collection 21.6% (n = 36), recurrent hepatitis C virus (HCV) 16.8% (n = 28), recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) 2.4% (n = 4), acute rejection 19.2% (n = 32). 65 (45.1%) of 144 complicated patients died, while 10 (43.5%) of 23 non complicated died. The incidence of whole, in hospital and late mortalities were 44.9%, 28.7% and 16.2% respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Mortality was higher among complicated cases where vascular complications and SFSS had significant effect on it so prevention and treatment of them is required for improving outcome.

Complications and mortality after adult to adult living donor liver transplantation: A retrospective cohort study

Background and aims

Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is widely performed for patients to resolve the critical shortage of organs from cadavers. Despite rapid implementation of the procedure, both complications and mortality of LDLT are annoying problems. The aim of this study was to analyze complications and mortality of patients after adult to adult LDLT (A-ALDLT) in a single center. Methods: Between April 2003 and November 2013, 167 (A-ALDLT) recipients in National Liver Institute, Egypt were included. We retrospectively analyzed complications and mortality in them.

Results

The overall incidence of complications was 86.2% (n = 144) and classified as biliary 43.7% (n = 73), vascular 21.6% (n = 36), Small for size syndrome (SFSS) 12.6% (n = 21), Gastrointestinal tract (GIT) 19.8% (n = 33), wound 12.6% (n = 21), chest 19.8% (n = 33), neurological 26.3% (n = 44), renal 21% (n = 35), intra abdominal collection 21.6% (n = 36), recurrent hepatitis C virus (HCV) 16.8% (n = 28), recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) 2.4% (n = 4), acute rejection 19.2% (n = 32). 65 (45.1%) of 144 complicated patients died, while 10 (43.5%) of 23 non complicated died. The incidence of whole, in hospital and late mortalities were 44.9%, 28.7% and 16.2% respectively. Conclusions: Mortality was higher among complicated cases where vascular complications and SFSS had significant effect on it so prevention and treatment of them is required for improving outcome.

•

Mortality was higher among complicated cases.

•

Vascular complication was independent predictors of poor outcome.

•

Small for size syndrome was independent predictors of poor outcome.

•

Proper management of the previous complications improve outcome of LDLT.

Association between anesthesiologist experience and mortality after orthotopic liver transplantation

The anesthesiologist has been recognized as an integral member of the liver transplant team, and previous studies have demonstrated that inter-anesthesiologist variability can be a driver of outcomes for high-risk patients. We hypothesized that anesthesiologist experience, defined as the number of previous liver transplants performed at our institution, the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, would be independently associated with outcomes for liver transplant patients. Eight hundred forty-nine liver transplants performed between January 2003 and January 2013 with a total of 22 anesthesiologists were analyzed. Each transplant was assigned an incremental case number that corresponded to the number of transplants that the attending anesthesiologist had already performed at our institution. Several perioperative covariates were controlled for in the context of a generalized linear mixed effects model to detail the influence of threshold levels of the incremental case number on the primary outcome, 30-day mortality, and a secondary outcome, 30-day graft failure. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to confirm the robustness of these findings. An incremental case number ≤ 5 was associated with a significantly greater risk of 30-day mortality (odds ratio = 2.24, 95% confidence interval = 1.11-4.54, P = 0.025), and there was evidence suggestive of a greater risk of 30-day graft failure (odds ratio = 1.93, 95% confidence interval = 0.95-3.93, P = 0.071). Sensitivity analyses ruled out threats to the validity of these findings, including dropout effects and time trends in the overall performance of the transplantation unit. In conclusion, this study shows that an anesthesiologist's level of experience has a significant effect on outcomes for liver transplant recipients, with increased mortality and possibly graft failure during a provider's first 5 cases. These findings may indicate the need for increased training and supervision for anesthesiologists joining the liver transplant team.

Clinical significance of gastrointestinal bleeding after living donor liver transplantation

The clinical presentations of gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) occurring after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) have not been fully described. We performed a retrospective analysis of 297 LDLT cases. Nineteen patients (6.4%) experienced GIB after LDLT. The etiology of GIB included bleeding at the jejunojejunostomy following hepaticojejunostomy (n = 13), peptic ulcer disease (n = 2), portal hypertensive gastropathy (n = 2), and other causes (n = 2). Hemostasis was achieved in 13 patients (68.4%) by endoscopic (n = 3), surgical (n = 1), or supportive treatments (n = 15), but not in the other six patients. Graft dysfunction (P < 0.001), hepaticojejunostomy (P = 0.01), portal vein pressure at the end of surgery >20 mmHg (P = 0.002), and operative blood loss >10 L (P = 0.004) were risk factors. One-year graft survival rate was significantly lower in patients with GIB than in patients without GIB (P < 0.001). The inhospital mortality rate was 52.6% for patients with GIB, 75.0% for patients with graft dysfunction, and 14.3% for patients without graft dysfunction (P = 0.028). Despite its infrequency after LDLT, GIB has strong correlation with graft dysfunction and inhospital mortality.

Liver regeneration

The liver is unique in its ability to regenerate in response to injury. A number of evolutionary safeguards have allowed the liver to continue to perform its complex functions despite significant injury. Increased understanding of the regenerative process has significant benefit in the treatment of liver failure. Furthermore, understanding of liver regeneration may shed light on the development of cancer within the cirrhotic liver. This review provides an overview of the models of study currently used in liver regeneration, the molecular basis of liver regeneration, and the role of liver progenitor cells in regeneration of the liver. Specific focus is placed on clinical applications of current knowledge in liver regeneration, including small-for-size liver transplant. Furthermore, cutting-edge topics in liver regeneration, including in vivo animal models for xenogeneic human hepatocyte expansion and the use of decellularized liver matrices as a 3-dimensional scaffold for liver repopulation, are proposed. Unfortunately, despite 50 years of intense study, many gaps remain in the scientific understanding of liver regeneration.

Living donor liver transplantation for obese patients: challenges and outcomes

Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is an accepted option for end-stage liver disease, particularly in countries in which there are organ shortages. However, little is known about LDLT for obese patients. We sought to determine the effects of obesity on pretransplant living donor selection for obese recipients and their outcomes. On the basis of body mass index (BMI) values, 148 patients were classified as normal weight (N), 148 were classified as overweight (OW), and 74 were classified as obese (O). O recipients had significantly greater BMI values (32.1 ± 1.6 versus 23.2 ± 1.9 kg/m(2), P < 0.001) and received larger actual grafts (918.9 ± 173 versus 839.4 ± 162 g, P = 0.002) than recipients with normal BMI values. Donors who donated to O recipients had a greater mean BMI (26.3 ± 3.8 kg/m(2)) than those who donated to N recipients (24.4 ± 3.2 kg/m(2), P = 0.001). Although O recipients were more likely to face some challenges in finding a suitable living donor, there were no differences in graft survival [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.955, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.474-1.924, P = 0.90] or recipient survival (HR = 0.90, 95% CI = 0.56-1.5, P = 0.67) between the 3 groups according to an adjusted Cox proportional hazards model. There were no significant differences in posttransplant complication rates between the 3 recipient groups or in the morbidity rates for the donors who donated to O recipients versus the donors who donated to OW and N recipients (P = 0.26). Therefore, we recommend that obese patients undergo pretransplant evaluations. If they are adequately evaluated and selected, they should be considered for LDLT.

Ischemic preconditioning improves liver tolerance to congestion-reperfusion injury in mice

BACKGROUND

Congestion-reperfusion injury (CRI) is a common complication after living donor liver transplantation, which has not been fully understood. It causes more severe inflammatory response as compared with ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI). Ischemic preconditioning (IPC) has been endowed with powerful protective properties toward IRI. This study aimed to investigate whether IPC also has a protective effect against CRI and potential underlying mechanisms.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Mice were randomly divided into sham operation, CRI, IPC-CRI, and congestion precondition (CPC-CRI) group. The hepatic vein of the left anterior hepatic lobe was occluded for 75 min followed by reperfusion in the CRI group. The blood inflow was previously clamped for 10 min followed by 10 min of reperfusion just before occluding the hepatic vein in the IPC-CRI group. To imitating IPC in the CPC-CRI group, 10 min of congestion followed by 10 min of reperfusion just before CRI was performed. The animals were sacrificed at 2, 6, 24, 48 h, and 7 d after reperfusion. The blood and liver samples were collected for hepatic function assay, histology, terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick end labeling, myeloperoxidase, and real-time polymerase chain reaction analysis.

RESULTS

Mice in the CRI, IPC-CRI, and CPC-CRI group demonstrated elevated liver enzymes, histologic damage, cellular apoptosis, and inflammatory response compared with those in the sham operation group. Compared with the CRI group, mice in the IPC-CRI group expressed lower alanine transaminase activities (2 h: 839.2 ± 132.5 versus 384.2 ± 94.8, P < 0.01; and 6 h: 680 ± 142.4 versus 342.3 ± 99.7, P < 0.01) and lower myeloperoxidase levels (2 h: 7.1 ± 4.0 U/g versus 3.8 ± 1.6 U/g, P < 0.05; and 6 h: 8.1 ± 1.3 U/g versus 5.2 ± 3.0 U/g, P < 0.05). However, the alanine transaminase level in the CPC-CRI group was notably higher at 2 h (839.2 ± 132.5 versus 1087.5 ± 192.5, P < 0.05). Livers from mice in the IPC-CRI group showed better tissue integrity, diminished hepatocellular injury, and apoptosis at 2 and 6 h. The messenger RNA transcriptions of interleukin 1 and interleukin 6 were significantly lower after 2-24 h of reperfusion, whereas tumor necrosis factor α and monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 were significantly lower after 24 h of reperfusion in the IPC-CRI group.

CONCLUSIONS

IPC can significantly improve liver tolerance to CRI by attenuating neutrophil infiltration, proinflammatory cytokine formation, and hepatocytes apoptosis. This pretreatment strategy holds greater prospect of being translated into clinical use in living donor liver transplantation.

Defining indications to ALPPS procedure: technical aspects and open issues

The limit to surgical treatment of patients with hepatic tumors is represented by the proportion of residual hepatic parenchyma at the end of surgery (FLR, future liver remnant) that provides an estimation of the risk of postoperative liver failure. Recently, a new two-stage technique has been developed with the acronym (ALPPS) associating liver partitioning and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy with the aim of obtaining a more rapid and effective increase in FLR, even though indications are not clear yet. Between January and December 2012, eight patients were candidates to ALPPS at the Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit of San Raffaele Hospital, Milan. The first three patients (Series 1) underwent right trisectionectomy and were affected by tumors infiltrating biliary confluence, while the others (Series 2) were candidates to right hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases. Two patients were then excluded from Series 2 because intraoperative finding of irresectable disease. Intra- and postoperative outcome was evaluated with the aim of defining indications to ALPPS. All patients reached an adequate FLR after a median of 7.5 days from the first procedure (rate of program completion 100 %). In Series 1 two patients developed complications related to bile leakage from the raw surface of the liver to be resected and septic events secondary to ischemic necrosis of the liver segment IV. One patient died following multi-organ failure secondary to sepsis. In Series 2 postoperative course was uneventful in all the patients, and in particular no patient showed disease progression between the two procedures or signs of postoperative liver failure. ALPPS approach was initially considered suitable for patients affected by Klatskin tumors who require, despite a small tumor volume, extended hepatectomies associated with surgery of the biliary tract: the analysis of this first series of patients has led to a re-evaluation of the indication to this strategy, as a consequence of encountered criticisms. Actually only a subset of patients affected by colorectal liver metastases are candidates to ALPPS.