1
|
Wu B, Bai Y, Yu S. Laparoscopic hepatopancreatoduodenectomy for synchronous intrahepatic and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: A case report. Oncol Lett 2023; 26:449. [PMID: 37720678 PMCID: PMC10502937 DOI: 10.3892/ol.2023.14036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2023] [Accepted: 08/02/2023] [Indexed: 09/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Laparoscopic hepatopancreatoduodenectomy (LHPD) is a complex surgical procedure with high rates of complications and mortality and is performed in a limited number of medical centers. The present study reports a case of a synchronous primary malignant tumor of the left hepatic common bile ducts. A 63-year-old male was admitted to Affiliated Jinhua Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine (Jinhua, China) with a 1 week history of right upper abdominal distension and pain associated with yellow sclera. Preoperative CT and MRI imaging demonstrated a synchronous primary malignant tumor of the left hepatic and common bile ducts; therefore, laparoscopic left hemihepatectomy and pancreaticoduodenectomy were performed. There was no biliary or pancreatic leakage following the operation and the patient was discharged 16 days later. Postoperative pathology verified that the synchronous primary cholangiocarcinoma originated in the left hepatic and common bile ducts. Therefore, LHPD for synchronous primary cholangiocarcinoma may be a safe and feasible treatment for this condition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bo Wu
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Affiliated Jinhua Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Jinhua, Zhejiang 321099, P.R. China
| | - Yang Bai
- Department of Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310009, P.R. China
| | - Shi'an Yu
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Affiliated Jinhua Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Jinhua, Zhejiang 321099, P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Porcu A, Deiana G, Feo CF, Ninniri C, Turilli D, Tanda L, Fancellu A. Hepatopancreatoduodenectomy for the treatment of extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 2023; 22:430-433. [PMID: 36041972 DOI: 10.1016/j.hbpd.2022.08.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2022] [Accepted: 08/16/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Alberto Porcu
- Department of Clinical, Surgical and Experimental Sciences, Unit of General Surgery 2 - Clinica Chirurgica, University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy
| | - Giulia Deiana
- Department of Clinical, Surgical and Experimental Sciences, Unit of General Surgery 2 - Clinica Chirurgica, University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy
| | - Claudio F Feo
- Department of Clinical, Surgical and Experimental Sciences, Unit of General Surgery 2 - Clinica Chirurgica, University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy
| | - Chiara Ninniri
- Department of Clinical, Surgical and Experimental Sciences, Unit of General Surgery 2 - Clinica Chirurgica, University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy
| | - Davide Turilli
- Unit of Radiological Sciences, AOU Sassari, Sassari, Italy
| | - Lorena Tanda
- Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy
| | - Alessandro Fancellu
- Department of Clinical, Surgical and Experimental Sciences, Unit of General Surgery 2 - Clinica Chirurgica, University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hepatopancreatoduodenectomy (HPD) has been considered the only curative treatment for metastatic cholangiocarcinoma and some locally advanced gallbladder cancers (GBCs). However, HPD has not yet been included in treatment guidelines as a standard surgical procedure in consideration of its morbidity and mortality rates. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of HPD in treating biliary malignancies. METHODS The medical records of 57 patients with advanced biliary cancer undergoing HPD from January 2009 to December 2019 were retrospectively retrieved. A case-control analysis was conducted at our department. Patients with advanced GBC who underwent HPD (HPD-GBC group) were compared with a control group (None-HPD-GBC group). Baseline characteristics, preoperative treatments, tumor pathologic features, operative results, and prognosis were assessed. RESULTS Thirteen patients with cholangiocarcinoma and 44 patients with GBC underwent HPD at our department. Significant postoperative complications (grade III or greater) and postoperative pancreatic fistula were observed in 24 (42.1%) and 15 (26.3%) patients, respectively. One postoperative death occurred in the present study. Overall survival (OS) was longer in patients with advanced cholangiocarcinoma than in those with GBC (median survival time [MST], 31 months vs . 11 months; P < 0.001). In the subgroup analysis of patients with advanced GBC, multivariate analysis demonstrated that T4 stage tumors ( P = 0.012), N2 tumors ( P = 0.001), and positive margin status ( P = 0.004) were independently associated with poorer OS. Patients with either one or more prognostic factors exhibited a shorter MST than patients without those prognostic factors ( P < 0.001). CONCLUSION HPD could be performed with a relatively low mortality rate and an acceptable morbidity rate in an experienced high- volume center. For patients with advanced GBC without an N2 or T4 tumor, HPD can be a preferable treatment option.
Collapse
|
4
|
Mehrabi A, Abbasi Dezfouli S, Schlösser F, Ramouz A, Khajeh E, Ali-Hasan-Al-Saegh S, Loos M, Strobel O, Müller-Stich B, Berchtold C, Mieth M, Klauss M, Chang DH, Wielpütz MO, Büchler MW, Hackert T. Validation of the ISGLS classification of bile leakage after pancreatic surgery: A rare but severe complication. Eur J Surg Oncol 2022; 48:2440-2447. [PMID: 35842371 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2022.06.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2022] [Revised: 06/17/2022] [Accepted: 06/20/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Hepaticoenterostomy is an important step of reconstruction during hepatopancreatobiliary (HPB) surgery with a subsequent bile leakage rate of up to 5%. The International Study Group of Liver Surgery (ISGLS) proposed a severity grading system for defining bile leakage after HPB surgery, which has not been validated after pancreatic surgery in a large patient cohort. The present study aimed to validate the ISGLS definition for bile leakage in pancreatic surgery and to investigate the postoperative outcomes of bile leakage after pancreatic resections. MATERIALS AND METHODS Data from the prospectively maintained database for pancreas surgery were extracted for any type of pancreatectomy with hepaticoenterostomy between 2006 and 2019. The severity of bile leakage was graded according to the ISGLS definition. The influence of our standardized hepaticoenterostomy technique and of the complexity of the surgical procedure on the rate of clinically relevant bile leakages (B and C) were assessed in three different timeframes. RESULTS Bile leakage was detected in 152 of 5,300 patients (2.9%). Clinically relevant bile leakages included seventy patients with grade B and eighty-two patients with grade C bile leakages (46.1% and 53.9%, respectively). During the study period, the overall rate of bile leakage showed to be stable (from 3.5% to 2.4%). Patients with grade C bile leakage had a higher rate of postoperative wound infection (P < 0.001) and longer ICU stays and hospital stays compared to patients with grade B bile leakage (P = 0.03 and P < 0.001 respectively). These parameters were significantly higher in patients with late grade C bile leakage but were similar between patients with grade B bile leakage and early grade C bile leakage (<5th day POD). In the whole patients' cohort, the 90-day mortality rate was 3.2% (174/5,300), with a rate of 25% in patients with bile leakage (38/152). CONCLUSION The ISGLS classification is a valid method for classifying postoperative bile leak after pancreas surgery. Standardization of our hepaticoenterostomy technique resulted in a stable rate of bile leakage. Although rare, bile leakage following pancreas surgery is a severe complication that has a major impact on patient outcomes and contributes significantly to morbidity and mortality, even in the absence of POPF.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arianeb Mehrabi
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, 69120, Germany; Liver Cancer Center Heidelberg (LCCH), Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany; European Pancreas Center, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Sepehr Abbasi Dezfouli
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, 69120, Germany
| | - Fabian Schlösser
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, 69120, Germany
| | - Ali Ramouz
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, 69120, Germany
| | - Elias Khajeh
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, 69120, Germany
| | - Sadeq Ali-Hasan-Al-Saegh
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, 69120, Germany
| | - Martin Loos
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, 69120, Germany; European Pancreas Center, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Oliver Strobel
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, 69120, Germany; European Pancreas Center, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Beat Müller-Stich
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, 69120, Germany; Liver Cancer Center Heidelberg (LCCH), Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christoph Berchtold
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, 69120, Germany
| | - Markus Mieth
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, 69120, Germany; Liver Cancer Center Heidelberg (LCCH), Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Miriam Klauss
- Liver Cancer Center Heidelberg (LCCH), Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - De-Hua Chang
- Liver Cancer Center Heidelberg (LCCH), Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Mark O Wielpütz
- Liver Cancer Center Heidelberg (LCCH), Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Markus W Büchler
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, 69120, Germany; Liver Cancer Center Heidelberg (LCCH), Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany; European Pancreas Center, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thilo Hackert
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, 69120, Germany; Liver Cancer Center Heidelberg (LCCH), Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany; European Pancreas Center, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Zhou Y, Li D, You J, Zeng S, Yu W. Hepatopancreatoduodenectomy for Locally Advanced Gallbladder Cancer: Is It Worthwhile? Indian J Surg 2022. [DOI: 10.1007/s12262-022-03471-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
|
6
|
Laparoscopic hepatopancreaticoduodenectomy for synchronous gallbladder cancer and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a case report. World J Surg Oncol 2022; 20:190. [PMID: 35681223 PMCID: PMC9178805 DOI: 10.1186/s12957-022-02628-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2021] [Accepted: 05/09/2022] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Hepatopancreaticoduodenectomy (HPD) is one of the most complex procedures, and it is very rarely reported. Laparoscopic HPD (LHPD) is even rarer. To date, there are only 3 reports of LHPD for locally advanced gallbladder cancer (GBC) or extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ECC). This is the first report of LHPD for synchronous GBC and ECC. Case presentation A 75-year-old female patient complained of jaundice for 2 weeks without fever or abdominal pain. She was diagnosed with synchronous GBC and ECC. After a comprehensive preparation, she underwent a laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy and resection of hepatic segments of IVb and V, and her digestive tract reconstruction followed Child’s methods. She was discharged on the 12th day postoperatively without pancreatic leakage, biliary leakage, or liver failure. Conclusions LHPD is safe and feasible for selected cases of GBCs or ECCs.
Collapse
|
7
|
Fancellu A, Sanna V, Deiana G, Ninniri C, Turilli D, Perra T, Porcu A. Current role of hepatopancreatoduodenectomy for the management of gallbladder cancer and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: A systematic review. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2021; 13:625-637. [PMID: 34163578 PMCID: PMC8204357 DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v13.i6.625] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2021] [Revised: 04/03/2021] [Accepted: 05/25/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hepatopancreatoduodenectomy (HPD) is the simultaneous combination of hepatic resection, pancreaticoduodenectomy, and resection of the entire extrahepatic biliary system. HPD is not a universally accepted due to high mortality and morbidity rates, as well as to controversial survival benefits.
AIM To evaluate the current role of HPD for curative treatment of gallbladder cancer (GC) or extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ECC) invading both the hepatic hilum and the intrapancreatic common bile duct.
METHODS A systematic literature search using the PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus databases was performed to identify studies reporting on HPD, using the following keywords: ‘Hepatopancreaticoduodenectomy’, ‘hepatopancreatoduodenectomy’, ‘hepatopancreatectomy’, ‘pancreaticoduodenectomy’, ‘hepatectomy’, ‘hepatic resection’, ‘liver resection’, ‘Whipple procedure’, ‘bile duct cancer’, ‘gallbladder cancer’, and ‘cholangiocarcinoma’.
RESULTS This updated systematic review, focusing on 13 papers published between 2015 and 2020, found that rates of morbidity for HPD have remained high, ranging between 37.0% and 97.4%, while liver failure and pancreatic fistula are the most serious complications. However, perioperative mortality for HPD has decreased compared to initial experiences, and varies between 0% and 26%, although in selected center it is well below 10%. Long term survival outcomes can be achieved in selected patients with R0 resection, although 5–year survival is better for ECC than GC.
CONCLUSION The present review supports the role of HPD in patients with GC and ECC with horizontal spread involving the hepatic hilum and the intrapancreatic bile duct, provided that it is performed in centers with high experience in hepatobiliary-pancreatic surgery. Extensive use of preoperative portal vein embolization, and preoperative biliary drainage in patients with obstructive jaundice, represent strategies for decreasing the occurrence and severity of postoperative complications. It is advisable to develop internationally-accepted protocols for patient selection, preoperative assessment, operative technique, and perioperative care, in order to better define which patients would benefit from HPD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandro Fancellu
- Department of Medical, Surgical and Experimental Sciences, University of Sassari, Sassari 07100, Italy
| | | | - Giulia Deiana
- Department of Medical, Surgical and Experimental Sciences, University of Sassari, Sassari 07100, Italy
| | - Chiara Ninniri
- Department of Medical, Surgical and Experimental Sciences, University of Sassari, Sassari 07100, Italy
| | | | - Teresa Perra
- Department of Medical, Surgical and Experimental Sciences, University of Sassari, Sassari 07100, Italy
| | - Alberto Porcu
- Department of Medical, Surgical and Experimental Sciences, University of Sassari, Sassari 07100, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Shimizu A, Motoyama H, Kubota K, Notake T, Fukushima K, Ikehara T, Hayashi H, Yasukawa K, Kobayashi A, Soejima Y. Safety and Oncological Benefit of Hepatopancreatoduodenectomy for Advanced Extrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma with Horizontal Tumor Spread: Shinshu University Experience. Ann Surg Oncol 2020; 28:2012-2025. [PMID: 33044629 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-020-09209-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2020] [Accepted: 09/19/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although hepatopancreatoduodenectomy (HPD) is the only means of achieving R0 resection of widespread extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, its safety and oncological benefit remain controversial because of its inherent high risk of mortality and morbidity. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to retrospectively analyze short- and long-term outcomes and evaluate the safety and oncological benefit of this advanced procedure. METHODS The study cohort comprised 37 consecutive patients who had undergone major HPD. Portal vein embolization was performed before surgery in 20 (54%) patients with future remnant liver volume < 35%. RESULTS The median operative time and blood loss were 866 min and 1000 mL, respectively. Concomitant vascular resection was performed in five patients (14%). The overall morbidity and mortality rates were 100% and 5.4% (n = 2), respectively. Nineteen patients (51%) had major (Clavien-Dindo grade III or higher) complications, the most common being intra-abdominal infection (49%) and post-hepatectomy liver failure (46%, grade B/C: 32%/5%), followed by postoperative pancreatic fistula (30%, grade B/C). R0 resection was achieved in 31 patients (84%). The 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates were 83%, 48%, and 37%, respectively. In patients with R0 resection, 5-year OS was comparable between patients who had undergone major HPD and major hepatectomy alone (41% vs. 40%, p = non-significant). CONCLUSIONS HPD is a valid treatment option for extensive cholangiocarcinoma, offering long-term survival benefit at the cost of relatively high but acceptable morbidity and mortality rates. HPD is advocated in selected patients provided that it is considered possible to achieve R0 resection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Akira Shimizu
- Division of Gastroenterological, Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic, Transplantation and Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Japan.
| | - Hiroaki Motoyama
- Division of Gastroenterological, Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic, Transplantation and Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Japan
| | - Koji Kubota
- Division of Gastroenterological, Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic, Transplantation and Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Japan
| | - Tsuyoshi Notake
- Division of Gastroenterological, Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic, Transplantation and Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Japan
| | - Kentaro Fukushima
- Division of Gastroenterological, Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic, Transplantation and Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Japan
| | - Tomohiko Ikehara
- Division of Gastroenterological, Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic, Transplantation and Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Japan
| | - Hikaru Hayashi
- Division of Gastroenterological, Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic, Transplantation and Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Japan
| | - Koya Yasukawa
- Division of Gastroenterological, Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic, Transplantation and Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Japan
| | - Akira Kobayashi
- Division of Gastroenterological, Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic, Transplantation and Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Japan
| | - Yuji Soejima
- Division of Gastroenterological, Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic, Transplantation and Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Transferability of Liver Transplantation Experience to Complex Liver Resection for Locally Advanced Hepatobiliary Malignancy - Lessons Learnt From 3 Decades of Single Center Experience. Ann Surg 2020; 275:e690-e697. [PMID: 32657940 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000004227] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To study the impact of LT experience on the outcome of CLR for locally advanced hepatobiliary malignancy SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA:: Despite evolution in LT knowledge and surgical techniques in the past decades, there is yet data to evaluate the significance of LT experience in performing CLR. METHODS Postoperative outcome after CLR between 1995 and 2019 were reviewed and correlated with LT experience in a single center with both LT and CLR service. CLR was defined as hepatectomy with vasculobiliary reconstruction, or multivisceral resection, central bisectionectomy (S4/5/8), or associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy. Spearman rank correlation and receiver operating characteristic analysis were used to define the association between CLR-related outcomes and LT experience. RESULTS With cumulative single-center experience of 1452 LT, 222 CLR were performed during the study period [hepatectomy with biliary (27.0%), or vascular (21.2%) reconstruction, with multivisceral resections (9.9%), with associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (18.5%)] mainly for hepatocellular carcinoma (53.2%), and hilar cholangiocarcinoma (14%). Median tumor size was 7.0 cm. Other features include macrovascular invasion (23.4%), and juxta-visceral invasion (14%). Major postoperative complication rate was 25.2% and mortality rate was 6.3%. CLR-complication rate was inversely associated with LT experience (R = -0.88, P < 0.005). Receiver operator characteristic analysis revealed the cutoff for LT experience to have the greatest influence on CLR was 95 with a sensitivity of 100% and Youden index of 1. Multivariable analysis showed that blood transfusion, prolonged operating time, LT experience </=95 were associated with major postoperative complications. CONCLUSION LT experience was complimentary to CLR for locally advanced hepatobiliary malignancy with improved postoperative outcome.
Collapse
|